impacts of running turbines in non-design modes impacts of running turbines in non-design modes...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Impacts of running Turbines
in non-design modes
Author: Mr. Steven R. Potter, Western Regional Manager/
Welding Engineer/CWI
Voith Hydro Services Inc., 2885 Olympic Street, Springfield,
OR 98478, USA. Tel: 541-743-6353
Email: [email protected]
Impacts of running turbnes in non-design modes – 2016
3
About This Presentation
• Anecdotal observation of changing operations
• Not a definitive statement on how things are
• Potential challenges to turbine equipment
• Subjective not objective
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
4
Words commonly used in this presentation
generally
possibly
sometimes
potentially
depends
varies
often
typically
could
if, but and maybe
not definitive
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
5
In This Presentation
• Type/Modes of unit operation
• Operating modes / Reasons for
• Original design intent
• Design vintage
• Effects of varying operation on turbines
• Potential impacts on equipment
• Conclusions
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
6
• Hydropower plants (typically) operate as base, intermediate,
load following or peaking power plants.
• Have (generally) the ability to start within minutes, in some
cases seconds.
• Plant operation depends heavily on its water supply.
• Many plants do not have enough water to operate at capacity
on a continuous basis.
• Plants may change their operating mode depending on the
time of year.
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
Operating modes
7
• Flood control, fish passage, water quality
• Navigation, recreation
• Irrigation
• Economics
• Grid stability /variability
• Load demand
• A lot of competing stakeholders and circumstances
• Not definitive
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
Reason for modes
8
Design Intent
• Hydro Turbine designs are (often) unique
• Designed around site and circumstances
• Head and flow determine turbine type and operating mode
capabilities
• Economics of site
• Materials and manufacturing era
• Design period tools
• Determination of best operating condition
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
11
Design Vintage
• (generally)
• Design Vintage determines the sophistication of the
engineering
• Older designs are (often) more conservative and empirical
• Newer designs use powerful computer analytics and modeling
• Older designs use heavier manufacturing gauge and cruder
alloys
• Newer designs (often) use closer tolerances
• Older are more unknown quality, newer less design margin
Presentation name | place or presenter | YYYY-MM-DD
12
Anecdotal Operation Types/Modes
(recent email)
“As of 2007 to present Unit 1 has 103 cycles and Unit 2 has
290 cycles. We follow a set hourly schedule. Worse case, we
change generator loading once per hour.”
Stated at the 2016 NWHA conference
“We are looking at power markets of 5 minute increments”
Stated at the 2016 CEATI conference
“Units are operating at 110% of nameplate rating”
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
13
Extremes of Operation Types/Modes
(recent email)
• Unit 1 has 103 cycles = Ave. 11.5 Start / Stop cycles per year
• Unit 2 has 290 cycles = Ave. 32.2 Start / Stop cycles per year
• Why are we interested in Start / Stop cycles?
• Barring Load Rejection / runaway conditions, Starts and Stops
represent the largest stresses on a machine
• Highest torque, heat loads, temperature rise, surface wear, potential
for systems failure
• More stops and starts and or constant adjustment = less life cycle
• Running very low or very high output (maybe) outside the design
intent
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
14
Typical Design Criteria
Load spectrum: (assumed load spectrum to achieve safety factor)
1.) rated operation = 105,9 rpm (+ 55% extra load for magnetic pull)
No. of starts: 17 940 (23 start/stop per month for 65 years)
2.) load rejection = 148,2 rpm (assumed ~140% of the rated speed)
No. of events: 500 (assumed)
3.) runaway = 212 rpm (max. over speed acc. to generator data)
No. of events: 5 (assumed)
• (If) Unit 1 operates at 11.5 cycles annually it (could) (maybe) have
a life cycle of 1565 years, (but) probably not
• Don’t assume this criteria applies to every machine
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
15
Design Criteria
Allowable Stresses as a Factor of Yield Strength
0.5
0.6
0.75
0.65
0.78
0.98
0.4
0.48
0.6
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Normal Operating Load
Cases
Exceptional Load Cases Extreme Load Cases
Facto
r o
f Y
ield
str
en
gth
Uniform Stress
Peak Stress
Mean value of
nominal stress
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
16
Observed Changing Operation Types/Modes
3 Cases
1. Francis units vintage 1960’s 50mW; being remotely
operated by owners power marketing group, operated to
sell on the power spot market, adjustments every ten
minutes or less, gate variance 20-55%. Original design
anticipated base / intermediate loads
2. Francis units re-runnered in 2000’s 38mW; operated as a
slave to upstream units, low output, running in or near
rough zone
3. Kaplan units vintage 1990’s 155mW; operated to fine tune
water passage, created draft tube pulses
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
18
Case 2 Francis Runner blade crown fatigue crack
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
19
-0.5
-0.3
-0.1
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80
Pre
sió
n A
bso
luta
/Hu
Tiempo (Seg)
Pulsación de PresiónEnsayo U3 - CFD
CDF SPA U3
Case 3 CFD Pressure Pulsations
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
20Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
Case 3 Kaplan Runner discharge ring fatigue
23
Static Stress and Deflection Analysis
Static Stress and Deflection Analysis Modal Analysis
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
24
Modal Analysis – Natural Frequencies
MODEFREQUENCY IN
WATER (Hz)
1 90.05
2 205.53
3 256.11
4 325.22
5 331.82
6 366.18
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016
25
Conclusions
• Hydro operations are changing due to external conditions
• Intermittent renewables are driving changes
• Most of the fleet was not designed to for new applications
• Probably expect that life cycle will be reduced
• May see increased maintenance demands
• Reduced reliability and production
• Increased costs of operation
• Refurbishments need to consider future use plans
Impacts of running turbines in non-design modes – 2016