impact of reductions in reserves in the euro area€¦ · 2015-q1 2015-q2 2015-q3 2015-q4 2016-q1...
TRANSCRIPT
Impact of Reductions in Reserves in the euro area
Monetary Policy Implementation Workshop New York, 28 September 2018
Cornelia Holthausen European Central Bank
ECB-PUBLIC
The views expressed in this presentation are the authors’ and may not necessarily coincide with those of the ECB or the Eurosystem.
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Bank reserves are still increasing in the euro area
Eurosystem balance sheet and excess liquidity
2
Note: Selected items from the assets (+) and (net) liabilities (-). Source: ECB.
Eurosystem balance sheet items Excess liquidity
Note: excess liquidity is defined as the daily reserve surplus (i.e. holdings above reserve requirements) plus deposit facility holdings and minus reliance on the marginal lending facility. Source: ECB.
ECB-PUBLIC
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
EONIA very close to the deposit facility rate
Short term money market rates are flat
Impact of Reductions in Reserves 3
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Overview
4
1
2
3
Interaction with regulation
Interaction with market segmentation
Interaction with HQLA supply and demand
ECB-PUBLIC
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Large LCR buffers and a large supply of high quality liquid securities
Note: 25th and 75th percentiles, median and weighted average LCR. Source: EBA Risk Dashboard for 190 banks.
Notes: total of high quality liquid securities supplied by governments and private entities, market value after LCR haircuts and before ECB operations, as of 2017-Q3. Source: Eurosystem calculations.
LCR compliance and HQLA supply
5
ECB-PUBLIC
Liquidity coverage ratio of EU banks Stock of HQL securities
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
EUR
bn
Level 2
Level 1 Covered Bond
Level 1 Government
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
Sep-
16
Nov
-16
Jan-
17
Mar
-17
May
-17
Jul-1
7
Sep-
17
Nov
-17
Jan-
18
Mar
-18
Interquartile range
Median
Weighted average
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
0500
1,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,000
2015
-Q1
2015
-Q2
2015
-Q3
2015
-Q4
2016
-Q1
2016
-Q2
2016
-Q3
2016
-Q4
2017
-Q1
2017
-Q2
2017
-Q3
2017
-Q4
2018
-Q1
EUR
bn
L1 government (domestic) L1 government (other) L1 covered bondsL2a corporate bonds L2a covered bonds L2a governmentL2b ABS L2b corporate bonds L2b covered bondsExcess liquidity
Euro area banks will want to replace part of the current reserve holdings with securities
Euro area banks’ HQLA holdings by type of HQLA
6
Note: see also forthcoming ECB Occasional Paper. Source: Eurosystem.
ECB-PUBLIC
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Redistribution of HQLA probably more relevant than the reduction • Exit from unconventional policy has a fairly neutral effect on HQLA
supply: – The maturity of the ECB securities portfolio and new bond issuance exchange
L1-HQLA mainly for L1-HQLA – The maturity of TLTROs does not reduce the liquidity transformation
opportunity for banks as long as the full allotment procedure applies
• Any upward pressure on government bond yields following the end of QE gets partly dampened if banks compete to hold more bonds
• Funding rates may experience upward pressure if banks see less liquidity inflows and compete for deposits and issue more
• HQLA demand could spill over to ECB refinancing operations
ECB’s impact on HQLA supply and demand
7
ECB-PUBLIC
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Overview
8
1
2
3
Interaction with regulation
Interaction with market segmentation
Interaction with HQLA supply and demand
ECB-PUBLIC
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu © 9
Notes: The sample period is 2013-2018, when new regulatory initiatives became relevant. The y-axis represents a stylised monetary policy corridor with MLF=1, MRO=0, DFR=-1. The vertical line indicates the excess liquidity level at which the expected market rate equals the MRO rate. Source: EMMI, ECB, ECB calculations.
Historic relation between EONIA and excess liquidity
A structural demand for excess liquidity may be present
ECB-PUBLIC
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu © 10
Unsecured money market unlikely to recover owing to regulation
Money market turnover
Notes: Sample of 38 banks reporting in both the Euro Money Market Survey until Q2 2015 and under the Money Market Statistical Reporting from Q3 2016 onwards. Source: ECB.
Interbank cash lending and borrowing of 38 banks (quarterly total transaction volumes)
ECB-PUBLIC
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2003
Q2
2004
Q2
2005
Q2
2006
Q2
2007
Q2
2008
Q2
2009
Q2
2010
Q2
2011
Q2
2012
Q2
2013
Q2
2014
Q2
2015
Q2
2016
Q3
2016
Q4
2017
Q1
2017
Q2
2017
Q3
2017
Q4
2018
Q1
2018
Q2
EUR
tn
OIS FX swaps Secured Unsecured
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu © 11
A return of cash management driven repo, and rate spikes on reporting dates?
Secured money market rates and volumes in the presence of excess liquidity
Note: volumes as executed on the Brokertec and MTS platforms (top panel); RepoFunds index and STOXX GC Pooling ON index (bottom panel). Source: Bloomberg, Brokertec, ECB, MTS.
Short-term repo and excess liquidity conditions
ECB-PUBLIC
-
300
600
900
1,200
1,500
1,800
2,100
-2.50
-2.00
-1.50
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
EUR
bn%Excess Liquidity (RHS) RepoFunds euro GC Pooling ECB deposit facility rate
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
EUR
bn
General Collateral Specific collateral
Cash driven repo rate
Collateral driven repo rate
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Overview
12
1
2
3
Interaction with regulation
Interaction with market segmentation
Interaction with HQLA supply and demand
ECB-PUBLIC
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
MP3 12 MP11 14 MP4 17 MP5 17 MP6 17 MP7 17 MP8 17 MP1 18 MP2 18
EUR
bn
Others
ES
IT
AT
BE
LU
FI
NL
FR
DE
Reserve reduction will concentrate on certain euro area countries
Excess liquidity concentration across euro area countries
13
Excess liquidity held with national central banks (averages of reserve maintenance periods)
ECB-PUBLIC
Notes: excess liquidity covers recourse to the deposit facility and current account holdings in excess of minimum reserve requirements. See also Baldo et al. (2017): “The distribution of excess liquidity in the euro area”, ECB Occasional Paper, 200. Source: ECB.
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Excess liquidity driven deposit flows to become less dominant
14
Flows in the unsecured interbank market (direction, volume and pricing) ECB-PUBLIC
→ Excess liquidity holding countries → Non excess liquidity holding countries → Non euro area
Notes: the lines represent clockwise from-to flows, with the thickness representing average volume and the colour the destination country group. The size of nodes represents the net inflow into a banking system, with blue nodes indicating excess liquidity holding banking systems. Sample period: July 2016 to April 2018. Source: ECB, ECB calculations.
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu © 15
Repo rates against various euro area collateral
Note: repo rates against German, French, Italian and Spanish collateral. Source: Brokertec, ECB, MTS.
Repo rate dispersion is likely to decline, leaving only differences in perceived creditworthiness
ECB-PUBLIC
-
300
600
900
1,200
1,500
1,800
2,100
2,400
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
EUR
bn%Excess Liquidity (RHS) DE FR IT ES ECB deposit facility rate
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu © 16
Repo spreads against size of monetary policy portfolio and excess liquidity
Note: spread on repo against French, German and Italian non general collateral below the ECB’s deposit facility rate (DFR) versus the size of the asset purchase programme. Source: Brokertec, ECB, MTS and ECB calculations.
Repo rate dispersion contained owing to sec lending and adjusted bank behaviour
ECB-PUBLIC
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
250 750 1,250 1,750 2,250 2,750
Exce
ss L
iqui
dity
EUR
bn
Repo
Spr
ead
to D
FR (p
p)
Monetary Policy Portfolio EUR bn
Excess liquidity (rhs) DE non-GC FR non-GC IT non-GC
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Conclusion
• LCR over-compliance and the large stock of HQL securities predict limited frictions from the reduction in reserves
• Euro area banks will want to replace a contained but sizeable share of the reserves with bonds, implying a redistribution of HQLA and competition with non-banks.
• The demand for HQLA will interact with other parts of the monetary policy framework: possible spillover to refinancing operations, dependence on the size of the corridor, etc.
• Cash driven market activity is expected to rise, but unlikely that the unsecured interbank segment reaches pre-crisis levels.
• The concentration of reserves in certain countries may involve frictions, but effects are likely to remain contained post-crisis.
17
ECB-PUBLIC
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Background
Impact of Reductions in Reserves 18
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
EONIA und ESTER - Volumes
(15 March 2017 – 31 July 2018; EUR billion )
Quellen: ECB and EMMI.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
03/2017 05/2017 07/2017 09/2017 11/2017 01/2018 03/2018 05/2018 07/2018
EONIAPre-ESTER
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
EONIA und ESTER – Spread and volatility
(15 March 2017 – 31 July 2018; per cent)
Quellen: ECB and EMMI.
-0.50
-0.45
-0.40
-0.35
-0.30
-0.25
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
03/2017 07/2017 11/2017 04/2018
EONIAPre-ESTER