impact of industry 4.0 on sustainability—bibliometric

sustainability

Review

Impact of Industry 4.0 onSustainability—Bibliometric Literature Review

Krzysztof Ejsmont * , Bartlomiej Gladysz and Aldona Kluczek

Faculty of Production Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland;[email protected] (B.G.); [email protected] (A.K.)* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-22-234-81-28

Received: 20 June 2020; Accepted: 11 July 2020; Published: 14 July 2020

Abstract: Nowadays, sustainability and Industry 4.0 (I4.0) are trending concepts used in the literatureon industrial processes. Industry 4.0 has been mainly addressed by the current literature froma technological perspective, overlooking sustainability challenges regarding this recent paradigm.The objective of this paper is to evaluate the state of the art of relations between sustainability and I4.0.The goal will be met by (1) mapping and summarizing existing research efforts, (2) identifying researchagendas, (3) examining gaps and opportunities for further research. Web of Science, Scopus, and a setof specific keywords were used to select peer-reviewed papers presenting evidence on the relationshipbetween sustainability and I4.0. To achieve this goal, it was decided to use a dynamic methodologycalled “systematic literature network analysis”. This methodology combines a systematic literaturereview approach with the analysis of bibliographic networks. Selected papers were used to builda reference framework formed by I4.0 technologies and sustainability issues. The paper contributesto the Sustainable Industry 4.0 reference framework with application procedures. It aims to showhow I4.0 can support ideas of sustainability. The results showed that apart from a huge contributionto both concepts, many papers do not provide an insight into realization of initiatives to introduceSustainable Industry 4.0.

Keywords: industry 4.0; sustainability; literature review; fourth industrial revolution; bibliometrics

1. Introduction

Industry 4.0 (I4.0) as a term and strategic initiative of the German government was introducedin 2011 [1,2]. Many similar transforming actions towards Industry 4.0 were taken in other developedcountries, e.g., US Advanced Manufacturing Partnership, Chinese Made in China, British SmartFactory and others [3]. I4.0 and smart manufacturing/factory (which are synonymous) are thenatural consequence of the historical developments of computer integrated manufacturing and flexiblemanufacturing systems [4] from the past decades. However, nowadays, through advanced technologiesthose ideas of CIM (Computer-integrated manufacturing) and FMS (Flexible manufacturing system)could be further developed and implemented at lower costs. Speaking of Industry 4.0, it should beconsidered as the applying of flexible automation, cyber-physical systems, (industrial) Internet of Things,sensors, collaborative and cognitive robotics, cloud computing, big data, computer modelling andsimulations, additive manufacturing (3D printing) [5]. This picture clearly shows the technology-drivennature of I4.0 on the one hand. On the other hand, businesses are expecting great benefits:

• economic, e.g., savings through more accurate planning, shorter lead times, increase ofenergy efficiency;

• environmental, e.g., increase of energy efficiency, decrease of manufacturing scrap waste, etc.;• social, e.g., increase of safety, more comfortable working environment, etc.

Sustainability 2020, 12, 5650; doi:10.3390/su12145650 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability

http://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability

http://www.mdpi.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-0878

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0619-0194

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12145650

http://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability

https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5650?type=check_update&version=2

Sustainability 2020, 12, 5650 2 of 29

Those benefits are foreseen through emerging possibilities for innovative execution of businessprocesses leading to the creation of a strategic advantage.

On the other hand, technology-driven nature combined with the relatively early phases of I4.0technologies lifecycle imply and raise several concerns:

• economic, especially the cost-intensive nature and difficulties with estimation of full financialbenefits and economic effectiveness (what could be approached with one of I4.0 technologies:computer simulation modelling);

• environmental, e.g., increase of electro-waste, increase of energy consumption;• social, e.g., human-robot interaction issues, unemployment threats, privacy issues.

It is clear that I4.0 does not only deliver benefits, but also requires careful consideration of theseconcerns. Both benefits and concerns could be clearly pictured in the triple bottom line categories:economic, environmental and social. Therefore, the general question arises of what the real impact ofI4.0 is on sustainability, both in terms of pros and cons.

Many authors researched phenomena of I4.0, its impacts on economy, society, its barriers andlimitations [6–10]. Still growing interests in Industry 4.0 as it marries advanced manufacturing andtechnology seems to be changing the way businesses function. Those changes are deployed to improvethe existing production systems by new technologies, offering a better way to organize and manageall processes within manufacturing and services with their logistics and supply chains. It representsthe ways in which all emerging capabilities such as blockchain technology, artificial intelligence(AI), robotics and cognitive technologies, augmented and virtual reality might connect with differentorganizational process assets into unified sustainable production systems [5].

Some systems and solutions combine recently emerging new technologies, e.g., cyber-physicalsystems, but none of technology could solve a problem without the integration with others. All thesetechnologies put together might give opportunities to [5]:

• realize the unique challenges of Industry 4.0;• create a sustainable industrial environment;• enhance its impact in the literature and business area.

Industry 4.0 as a contributor to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [11] builds connectivitybetween the industry and sustainability by finding a significant relation between their components.The main efforts are, therefore, related to the tools and methods used for the comprehensive analysisof these terms. Much research or state-of-the-art reviews have been already done by researchers,separately for sustainability and Industry 4.0 phenomena [12,13]. A systematic literature review ofIndustry 4.0 resulting in modelling relationships between sustainability functions and Industry 4.0was presented in [14], while [15] proposed a new concept of Sustainable Industry 4.0. As intended bythe United Nations Sustainable Development Goals [11] for 2030, technological progress is drivingthe challenge of transition from traditional technology into intelligent machines without limitingthe sustainability of the industrial economy. The combination of AI, robotics and other advancedtechnologies applied across many sectors of economy, e.g., the supply chain, distribution channels,manufacturing, provides a significant impact on the natural environment leading to reduction ofpollution, decrease in greenhouse gases emission, decrease in energy consumption and increasein profits, simultaneously. The emergence of Industry 4.0 opens the opportunity of connectivity oftechnology with resources and skills in terms of sustainability benefits (zero impact—lower cost—socialequity). Industry 4.0 can reduce the environmental impact of a product, a process, or a service basedon footprint data availability and traceable analysis [16]. Additionally, it helps to leverage a greaterefficiency of functions e.g., reduction of resource consumption. Therefore, Industry 4.0 might contributesustainability to develop digital sustainable operations allowing to meet SDGs goals. Furthermore,increasing development of smart technologies is envisaged as affecting sustainability. The potentialof Industry 4.0 is still existing with its unknown impact on other areas like socio-environmentalsustainability [14] or making opportunities for realizing Industry 4.0 through intelligent systems.


There is a growing number of reviews about the impact on and/or connection of Industry 4.0with sustainability over the last years. For comparison of fourteen identified reviews, see Table 1.This paper significantly differs from other identified reviews as those are narrowed and focusedon specific processes (e.g., maintenance), technologies (e.g., big data), industries (e.g., pharma),aspects (e.g., environmental only). There are no reviews available that tackle comprehensivelyall triple bottom line perspectives. This research delivers novelty in the developed framework tosupport decision makers seeking I4.0 impacts on sustainability. The framework is developed froma bibliometric literature review. Therefore, it is comprehensive and covering possibly the widest rangeof problems and relations. The framework is a one-of-its-kind roadmap. This map enables makingsustainability-concerned decisions on I4.0 initiatives. It identifies, refers to, and indicates paperscontaining research on links, pros, cons, convergences and discrepancies of the I4.0 toolset and differentsustainability-oriented concepts.

Table 1. Reviews about the impact on and/or connection of Industry 4.0 on sustainability.

Paper Description of the Content

[12] Focused and narrowed to the specific area of maintenance activities supported by I4.0 and its impact on sustainability

[15] Review presents I4.0 and sustainability technologies; the Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework is a combination ofIndustry 4.0 technologies, process integration and sustainable outcomes

[17] General review on smart factory with no specific focus on sustainability issues

[18]General review on green supply chain management with no focus on manufacturing and no focus on specific issues

related to I4.0 impacts on green concepts, narrowed to environmental aspects with no focus on economic andsocial concerns

[19] Review focused on social concerns with no focus on economic and environmental ones

[20] Review on sustainable supply chains with no focus on manufacturing and no focus on I4.0 support for sustainablesupply chains

[21] Review with no specific focus on sustainability of I4.0, focused on the development of a research agenda for I4.0

[22] Review with no specific focus on sustainability of I4.0, focused on the development of a research agenda for I4.0

[23] Review focused on specific technology of big data applications

[24] Review focused on energy efficiency

[25] Review focused on specific issues of digitization

[26] Narrowed to specificity of pharma industry

[27] Narrowed to digitization

[28] Narrowed to IoT and focused on supply chains with no focus on manufacturing

In this paper, a literature-based analysis will be performed to find a relationship between Industry4.0 and sustainability across many industries. In particular, a research challenge on Sustainable Industry4.0 is seen for industrial application. This relation which is still quite fuzzy lies in a comprehensivequalitative assessment based on a literature review. To address this concern, this scientific paper isfocused on systematic literature network analysis in order to find the link between Industry 4.0 andsustainability. Beside the extensive research on the Fourth Industrial Revolution direction whichwas conducted, a systematic review of literature aims to investigate the bidirectional relation ofsustainability with Industry 4.0. Therefore, this paper can provide motivation for understandingthe scale of interest and implications, while on the other hand systematizing the existing knowledgeabout separate concepts (Industry 4.0 and sustainability) and extending this knowledge about researchtowards the integration of the mentioned concepts, making a valuable theoretical contribution tothe body of scientific literature in this research field. The consequence of the studies is to developdirections for further research. It would allow scholars and other interested parties to conduct morecomplex research on the development of quantitative assessment methods combining sustainabilityand Industry 4.0, which is rarely available [29].

The advantage of the authors’ paper over another scientific articles lies in a comprehensivesystematic literature review on sustainability and Industry 4.0 by:


• rationalizing and systemizing the state-of-the-art knowledge on the considered topics using thedynamic systematic literature network analysis;

• presenting the literature analysis in terms of its three dimensions: (1) systematic review, (2) typeand application of reviewed study, and (3) bibliographic networks of literature review;

• making an attempt to deliver answers addressing research questions in the current publishedstudies on these topics;

• contributing to the existing body of research literature focused on combining the concepts.

The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the research methodology and adoptedbibliometric software. Then research questions are formulated, and results of systematic literaturenetwork analysis are described in Section 3. Section 3 also contains SLNA-based SustainableIndustry 4.0 reference framework along with its application procedure. Section 4 discusses theresults presenting answers to research questions. Directions for future research are also describedin Section 4. Conclusions are outlined in Section 5.

2. Materials and Methods

Two databases were used for literature analysis: Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)and Scopus, because those are the most common databases for conducting literature searches [30].These databases are also considered to be the two most important multidisciplinary bibliometricdatabases [31] that are used for field delineation [17]. WoSCC and Scopus are also leading databases withtheir significant scientific impacts characterized by a high level of quality of reported documents [32].The content of those databases is of high quality due to restrictive indexing procedures.

Systematic Literature Network Analysis (SLNA) [17,33] is the methodology chosen for the selectionand analysis of papers (Figure 1).

Sustainability 2020, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 31

complex research on the development of quantitative assessment methods combining sustainability and Industry 4.0, which is rarely available [29].

The advantage of the authors’ paper over another scientific articles lies in a comprehensive sys-tematic literature review on sustainability and Industry 4.0 by:

• rationalizing and systemizing the state-of-the-art knowledge on the considered topics using the dynamic systematic literature network analysis;

• presenting the literature analysis in terms of its three dimensions: (1) systematic review, (2) type and application of reviewed study, and (3) bibliographic networks of literature review;

• making an attempt to deliver answers addressing research questions in the current pub-lished studies on these topics;

• contributing to the existing body of research literature focused on combining the con-cepts.

The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the research methodology and adopted bibliometric software. Then research questions are formulated, and results of systematic literature network analysis are described in Section 3. Section 3 also contains SLNA-based Sustainable Industry 4.0 reference framework along with its application procedure. Section 4 discusses the results present-ing answers to research questions. Directions for future research are also described in Section 4. Con-clusions are outlined in Section 5.

2. Materials and Methods

Two databases were used for literature analysis: Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and Scopus, because those are the most common databases for conducting literature searches [30]. These databases are also considered to be the two most important multidisciplinary bibliometric databases [31] that are used for field delineation [17]. WoSCC and Scopus are also leading databases with their significant scientific impacts characterized by a high level of quality of reported documents [32]. The content of those databases is of high quality due to restrictive indexing procedures.

Systematic Literature Network Analysis (SLNA) [17,33] is the methodology chosen for the selec-tion and analysis of papers (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Research methodology based on SLNA.

The SLNA methodology (Figure 1) consists of two main steps. Systematic literature review (SLR) is the first step. It allows to determine the scope of research and generate studies for use as input in the next step (namely, bibliographic network analysis and visualization). The SLR approach [34,35] provides identification and selection of the most appropriate papers that will be included in further analyses of secondary data. SLR differs from other literature review methods due to its principles of transparency, inclusivity, explanatory and heuristic nature which allow for a more objective over-view of search results, and elimination of any bias and errors [36]. To formulate research questions

Figure 1. Research methodology based on SLNA.

The SLNA methodology (Figure 1) consists of two main steps. Systematic literature review (SLR)is the first step. It allows to determine the scope of research and generate studies for use as inputin the next step (namely, bibliographic network analysis and visualization). The SLR approach [34,35]provides identification and selection of the most appropriate papers that will be included in furtheranalyses of secondary data. SLR differs from other literature review methods due to its principles oftransparency, inclusivity, explanatory and heuristic nature which allow for a more objective overviewof search results, and elimination of any bias and errors [36]. To formulate research questions anddefine a scope of the analysis, Denyer and Tranfield [36] proposed the use of the Context, Intervention,Mechanism and Outcome approach (CIMO). The second step is bibliographic network analysis andvisualization (BNAV) that allows to determine the development of major existing topics and emergingresearch trends using network analyses, e.g., citation network analysis (CNA), co-occurrence ofkeywords and burst detection analysis. CNA is one of the main areas of bibliometric research thatuses various methods of citation analysis to establish relationships between authors or their studies.


It assumes that the citation network is a system of channels that transform scientific knowledge orinformation. It is possible because scientists from one organization tend to cite each other to place theirstudy in the field of previous or existing knowledge [37]. Typically, a network analysis is performed tomap the range and structure of the discipline when discovering key research clusters [18].

The article adopts the methodology that is consistent with the prominent review papers fromthe field [34,38,39]. The systematic review process is based on manual filtering which allows tominimize the bias of the results of the literature review. It also enables the identification, assessmentand synthesis of all relevant studies using a transparent and replicable process. This approach isalso suitable for obtaining more information and a thorough understanding of both quantitative andqualitative issues, not automatic filtering enough just for quantitative considerations. The approachis the right way to set selection criteria and ensure more rigorous methodological control. It alsoallows to provide a thorough understanding of qualitative aspects, which perfectly complement thebibliometric analysis [40]. Centobelli et al. [41] examined not only abstracts and keywords, but alsofull-text academic papers. The approach adopted is also consistent with the content analysis, which isa method enabling the development of reliable literature reviews [42,43]. Berelson [44] defines contentanalysis as “a research technique for the objective, systematic and quantitative description of themanifest content of communication”. The use of content analysis should minimize research bias andimprove the reliability and repeatability of given constructs [45].

In order to conduct analyses on selected papers, it was decided to use two software tools,i.e., VOSviewer, version 1.6.15 [46] and CiteSpace, version 5.6.R5 [47]. The VOSviewer tool [48]provides easy access to bibliometric mapping using data extracted from Web of Science and Scopus.The software is based on the Visualization of Similarities (VOS) algorithm introduced by van Eck andWaltman [49]. It allows to visualize a relationship between entities in such a way that both direct andindirect connections between them place these units closer together on the map [49]. Visualization canhave one of three forms: network, overlay or density. The size and clarity of the label of a givenelement suggests the frequency of its occurrence in the analyzed set. In turn, the proximity of thelocation of the elements indicates, more commonly than in the case of distant ones, co-occurrencein specific sets. Moreover, if a given element appears in the center of the map (the strongest cluster,color-coded in a properly prepared visualization view), it can be concluded that it is in relation toa larger and more diverse group of other elements [50]. The software, after selecting the type ofanalysis (e.g., citation, co-occurrence), unit of analysis (e.g., documents, keywords), type of counting(full, fractional), as well as providing threshold values, e.g., number documents, citations, keywords,allows to create a co-existence network. Hence, VOSviewer was used in the paper to create a citationnetwork and a co-occurrence network of authors’ keywords.

CiteSpace is a Java application for detecting, visualizing and analyzing emerging trends andtransient patterns in scientific literature [51]. It was created as a software tool for progressivevisualization of domain of knowledge [52]. CiteSpace focuses on searching for critical points for thedevelopment of a given discipline or field of knowledge, more precisely pivotal and intellectual turningpoints [51,53]. The tool is useful in the case of temporal and structural analyses of various networks(e.g., authors’ keywords) based on scientific studies. CiteSpace is equipped with a burst detectionalgorithm that allows to detect a series of keywords. The result of the algorithm execution is a list ofpopular keywords over time (topic bursts). CiteSpace was used to perform a burst detection analysis.

The primary source of input for both applications were files generated in WoSCC and/or Scopus.Basic quantitative information about the papers selected for the analysis and Global Citation ScoreAnalysis results were obtained from WoSCC and Scopus bibliometric tools. The adopted researchmethodology and selected software tools were also used to create a literature review on the concept ofLean Industry 4.0 [54].


3. Results

3.1. Systematic Literature Review

3.1.1. Research Question Formulation

Based on the available literature reviews on the relationship between “sustainability” and “Industry4.0” [12,15,55–57], the following three research questions (RQs) were formulated, which have not yetbeen fully answered on scientific grounds:

• RQ1. How applications of Industry 4.0 can contribute to sustainable development?• RQ2. How Industry 4.0 technologies and tools can be integrated into sustainability practices on

a theoretical and practical basis?• RQ3. What are the main approaches/methodologies/frameworks/tools that should be considered

for integrating Industry 4.0 with sustainable development?

In order to answer these questions and fill emerging gaps in the literature on this topic, the SLNAmethodology was applied (Figure 1). Based on the results obtained, it was possible to organizeknowledge in the above-mentioned research area and develop a reference framework to understandhow Industry 4.0 can support the triple bottom line [58], represented by the three dimensions(economic, social and environmental) of sustainable development. The developed framework alsoincludes application procedures which will facilitate its use in future research and industrial practice.

3.1.2. Locating Studies and Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

The exploration of existing literature on the links between sustainability and Industry 4.0 wasbased on the identification of available research based on specific keywords. The preliminary or trialselection of relevant papers for bibliographic research was focused on the construction of a searchquery including various terms, synonyms and abbreviations related to the words “sustainability” and“Industry 4.0”.

To identify all effective terms, synonyms and abbreviations for the above-mentioned words,the authors studied the most frequently cited literature reviews on sustainability [20,59–61] andIndustry 4.0 [15,21,22] in WoSCC and Scopus. In this case, to avoid duplication of papers, a queryexpression (Equation (1)) reflecting the keyword “sustainability” was initially explored: “(sustainab*OR triple bottom line OR TPL OR ( . . . )”. This was aimed to shed light on a scale of sustainabilityresearch activities to understand how these studies support the Sustainable Development Goals.The focus was around determining challenges in implementing SDGs in industrial practice.

The keyword “Industry 4.0” is mainly used in Europe, while in both the Americas and Asia thisparadigm is most often called smart manufacturing, smart production or smart factory [17]. The reasonfor using the different names lies in national strategies that have been developed addressing the needof national economies to increase their competitiveness in the manufacturing area. Strategies suchas: “Industry 4.0” in Germany [2], “Smart Manufacturing Plan” [62] and “Advances ManufacturingPartnership (APM)” in the United States [21], “Made in China 2025” [63], are crucial due to creatingemployment opportunities, improving innovation and advancing sustainability [64]. These initiativesbased on the foundations of the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution also provide great potential forpredicting the future of manufacturing. The core of this revolution is smart manufacturing which wasdefined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as a fully integrated, collaborativemanufacturing system that responds in real time to meet changing requirements and conditions in thefactory, in the supply chain, and the needs of customers [65]. As other names and abbreviations forthe term “Industry 4.0”are being used, the authors assumed: “4.0 Industry“, “Industrie 4.0”, “I4.0”,“I4”, ”Fourth Industrial Revolution”, “4th Industrial Revolution” [54]. In order to avoid mistakes,e.g., plural forms, wildcards are used in the following keywords “sustainab*”, “green*”, “clean*”,


“industr*”, “4*”, “manufactur*”, “factor*”, “enterpris*” [19]. Based on the keyword considerationsabove, the searching query was formulated as follows (Equation (1)):

sustainab∗ OR triple bottom line OR TPLOR [(green∗ OR clean∗) AND production]

AND

Industr∗ 4∗ OR 4∗ Industr∗ OR I4.0 OR I4 OR[(Fourth OR 4∗) AND Indsustrial Revolution] OR

[smart AND (manufactur∗ OR factor∗ OR enterpris∗)]OR enterprise∗ 4∗

(1)

In the created query (Equation (1)) the most common scientific terms/synonyms/abbreviations forIndustry 4.0 were used based on earlier studies. There are also other, less popular terms/synonyms ofIndustry 4.0 such as: Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) or Future Manufacturing. There are papersin which IIoT is actually treated as a synonym for Industry 4.0 [66], but most researchers state that IIoTis one of the main technologies of Industry 4.0 (next to CPS and big data). For this reason, it was notincluded in the query. It is also worth noting that in the vast majority of IIoT articles, the term Industry4.0 also appears in the title/abstract/keywords.

The identified query was introduced in WoSCC and Scopus including search: title, abstract andkeywords at the beginning of April 2020 (06.04.2020). The search was limited to scientific research workspublished after 2011, because in this year the term “Industry 4.0” was used for the first time and thebasic assumptions of the Fourth Industrial Revolution were defined [2]. Only articles in English fromreviewed journals (including ones in press) were considered for further analysis. There were 312 papersin WoSCC and 406 in Scopus. Only 25% of searched articles indexed in WoSCC were not indexedin Scopus. It should also be noted that the first 20 papers with the highest number of citations and thehighest average citations per year indexed in WoSCC are also found in Scopus. Therefore, the searchresults from the Scopus database were chosen for further analysis. The objective was to select studieswhich concerned the relationship between sustainability and Industry 4.0. Paper selection was limitedto the following fields: engineering, environmental science, energy, business, management andaccounting, social sciences, computer science, decision sciences, chemical engineering, economics,econometrics and finance, materials science.

162 relevant publications were selected after screening titles, abstracts and keywords of theidentified documents. Then, the full version of text was read if there was any doubt whether the paperconcerned the relationship between sustainability and Industry 4.0 and was helpful in finding answersto the formulated research questions.

3.1.3. Papers Selected for the Analysis

Figure 2 shows that the interest in the topic was not significant in the period 2012–2017. In 2018,there was a visible increase in interest in combining both concepts (36 papers). In 2019, another essentialincrease was recorded—over 100% compared to 2017 (76). Such a dynamic growth in interest in thistopic underlines its current importance and relevance. In the first 3 months of 2020, 34 articles wereidentified, so if this trend continues, it will mean another increase in the number of papers comparedto the previous year.

As shown in Figure 3, most of the papers were created in Asia (India—15%, China—9%),Europe (Italy—11%, United Kingdom—11%, Germany—8%, Spain—7%, France—6%) and North andSouth America (United States—12%, Brazil—7%). Other articles constitute a small percentage of thetotal papers. A dispersion of studies between continents and countries may show that the discussedtopic is very important and has a global significance. An additional argument is the fact that manycountries (e.g., USA, Germany, China, UK) are pursuing national strategies for the development of theFourth Industrial Revolution, of which sustainability is a very important aspect.



“green*”, “clean*”, “industr*”, “4*”, “manufactur*”, “factor*”, “enterpris*” [19]. Based on the key-word considerations above, the searching query was formulated as follows (Equation (1)): sustainab∗ OR triple bottom line OR TPL OR green∗ OR clean∗ AND production AND Industr∗ 4∗ OR 4∗ Industr∗ OR I4.0 OR I4 ORFourth OR 4∗ AND Indsustrial Revolution ORsmart AND manufactur∗ OR factor∗ OR enterpris∗OR enterprise∗ 4∗

(1)

In the created query (Equation (1)) the most common scientific terms/synonyms/abbreviations for Industry 4.0 were used based on earlier studies. There are also other, less popular terms/synonyms of Industry 4.0 such as: Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) or Future Manufacturing. There are papers in which IIoT is actually treated as a synonym for Industry 4.0 [66], but most researchers state that IIoT is one of the main technologies of Industry 4.0 (next to CPS and big data). For this reason, it was not included in the query. It is also worth noting that in the vast majority of IIoT articles, the term Industry 4.0 also appears in the title/abstract/keywords.

The identified query was introduced in WoSCC and Scopus including search: title, abstract and keywords at the beginning of April 2020 (06.04.2020). The search was limited to scientific research works published after 2011, because in this year the term “Industry 4.0” was used for the first time and the basic assumptions of the Fourth Industrial Revolution were defined [2]. Only articles in Eng-lish from reviewed journals (including ones in press) were considered for further analysis. There were 312 papers in WoSCC and 406 in Scopus. Only 25% of searched articles indexed in WoSCC were not indexed in Scopus. It should also be noted that the first 20 papers with the highest number of citations and the highest average citations per year indexed in WoSCC are also found in Scopus. Therefore, the search results from the Scopus database were chosen for further analysis. The objective was to select studies which concerned the relationship between sustainability and Industry 4.0. Paper selection was limited to the following fields: engineering, environmental science, energy, business, management and accounting, social sciences, computer science, decision sciences, chemical engineer-ing, economics, econometrics and finance, materials science.

162 relevant publications were selected after screening titles, abstracts and keywords of the iden-tified documents. Then, the full version of text was read if there was any doubt whether the paper concerned the relationship between sustainability and Industry 4.0 and was helpful in finding an-swers to the formulated research questions.

3.1.3. Papers Selected for the Analysis

Figure 2 shows that the interest in the topic was not significant in the period 2012–2017. In 2018, there was a visible increase in interest in combining both concepts (36 papers). In 2019, another es-sential increase was recorded—over 100% compared to 2017 (76). Such a dynamic growth in interest in this topic underlines its current importance and relevance. In the first 3 months of 2020, 34 articles were identified, so if this trend continues, it will mean another increase in the number of papers compared to the previous year.

Figure 2. Number of selected papers in Scopus.



As shown in Figure 3, most of the papers were created in Asia (India—15%, China—9%), Europe (Italy—11%, United Kingdom—11%, Germany—8%, Spain—7%, France—6%) and North and South America (United States—12%, Brazil—7%). Other articles constitute a small percentage of the total papers. A dispersion of studies between continents and countries may show that the discussed topic is very important and has a global significance. An additional argument is the fact that many coun-tries (e.g., USA, Germany, China, UK) are pursuing national strategies for the development of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, of which sustainability is a very important aspect.

Figure 3. Countries of selected papers.

Subject areas to which selected papers relate are presented in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Research subjects of the selected papers according to Scopus.

The selected papers are dominated by one subject area: engineering (80 articles). It proves that in most articles the authors focused on aspects related to manufacturing in which the integration of Industry 4.0 and sustainability concepts enables the creation of new engineering solutions to achieve more sustainable and green production. The next most numerous subject areas regarding the ana-lyzed topic are environmental science (59) and energy (53). This may indicate that these papers con-centrated on using Industry 4.0 technologies and tools to protect the natural environment, increase energy efficiency and achieve sustainable development goals. Next up are articles related to business, management and accounting (46), social sciences (46) and computer science (37). These articles ex-amine the impact of Industry 4.0 on business management issues based on the triple bottom line (TBL) framework. The impact can be measured using IT tools/algorithms based on Industry 4.0 tech-nologies. Other subject matters are less numerous in terms of articles and cover many different fields (although all of them are related to engineering and management), which may indicate the interdis-ciplinary nature of the issue of sustainability and I4.0.

The largest number of articles have been published in Sustainability (Figure 5) by far. It is a consequence of the thematic scope of the journal, one of the main themes of which is to improve sustainability through Industry 4.0. The number of papers in other journals is smaller, but all of them focus on the issues of cleaner/green production and manufacturing, production and operations man-agement considering environmental and sustainability research and practice. The number of selected papers was classified in terms of applications and types (Table 2).





As shown in Figure 3, most of the papers were created in Asia (India—15%, China—9%), Europe (Italy—11%, United Kingdom—11%, Germany—8%, Spain—7%, France—6%) and North and South America (United States—12%, Brazil—7%). Other articles constitute a small percentage of the total papers. A dispersion of studies between continents and countries may show that the discussed topic is very important and has a global significance. An additional argument is the fact that many coun-tries (e.g., USA, Germany, China, UK) are pursuing national strategies for the development of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, of which sustainability is a very important aspect.




The selected papers are dominated by one subject area: engineering (80 articles). It proves that in most articles the authors focused on aspects related to manufacturing in which the integration of Industry 4.0 and sustainability concepts enables the creation of new engineering solutions to achieve more sustainable and green production. The next most numerous subject areas regarding the ana-lyzed topic are environmental science (59) and energy (53). This may indicate that these papers con-centrated on using Industry 4.0 technologies and tools to protect the natural environment, increase energy efficiency and achieve sustainable development goals. Next up are articles related to business, management and accounting (46), social sciences (46) and computer science (37). These articles ex-amine the impact of Industry 4.0 on business management issues based on the triple bottom line (TBL) framework. The impact can be measured using IT tools/algorithms based on Industry 4.0 tech-nologies. Other subject matters are less numerous in terms of articles and cover many different fields (although all of them are related to engineering and management), which may indicate the interdis-ciplinary nature of the issue of sustainability and I4.0.

The largest number of articles have been published in Sustainability (Figure 5) by far. It is a consequence of the thematic scope of the journal, one of the main themes of which is to improve sustainability through Industry 4.0. The number of papers in other journals is smaller, but all of them focus on the issues of cleaner/green production and manufacturing, production and operations man-agement considering environmental and sustainability research and practice. The number of selected papers was classified in terms of applications and types (Table 2).


The selected papers are dominated by one subject area: engineering (80 articles). It proves thatin most articles the authors focused on aspects related to manufacturing in which the integrationof Industry 4.0 and sustainability concepts enables the creation of new engineering solutions toachieve more sustainable and green production. The next most numerous subject areas regarding theanalyzed topic are environmental science (59) and energy (53). This may indicate that these papersconcentrated on using Industry 4.0 technologies and tools to protect the natural environment, increaseenergy efficiency and achieve sustainable development goals. Next up are articles related to business,management and accounting (46), social sciences (46) and computer science (37). These articles examinethe impact of Industry 4.0 on business management issues based on the triple bottom line (TBL)framework. The impact can be measured using IT tools/algorithms based on Industry 4.0 technologies.Other subject matters are less numerous in terms of articles and cover many different fields (althoughall of them are related to engineering and management), which may indicate the interdisciplinarynature of the issue of sustainability and I4.0.

The largest number of articles have been published in Sustainability (Figure 5) by far. It isa consequence of the thematic scope of the journal, one of the main themes of which is to improvesustainability through Industry 4.0. The number of papers in other journals is smaller, but all ofthem focus on the issues of cleaner/green production and manufacturing, production and operations


management considering environmental and sustainability research and practice. The number ofselected papers was classified in terms of applications and types (Table 2).Sustainability 2020, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 31

Figure 5. Journals of selected papers.

Table 2. Number of according due to their application and type.

Application Paper

Academic Industrial Academic & Industrial

Conceptual 28 7 49 Literature review 15 0 10

Case study 5 3 8 Empirical research 3 2 13

Survey 13 0 6

The results depicted that according to the paper types, conceptual studies dominated (84) over literature reviews (25) and surveys (19). Slightly less represented than the abovementioned paper types are empirical research (18) and case studies (16). This indicates a visible advantage of theoretical papers over practical ones. When it comes to applications, most of the articles are academic and in-dustrial (86). These papers develop scientific issues and contain references to their applications in industry. It can also be seen that academic applications (64) significantly outweigh industrial ones (12). This confirms the advantage of theoretical works over practical ones.

3.2. Bibliographic Network Analysis

3.2.1. Citation Network Analysis

Citation network analysis (CNA) is a method of network analysis in which papers are presented in the form of nodes and citations are depicted as links between them. Thanks to the CNA, it is pos-sible to track the citation network which allows for a better understanding of the impact of previous studies on subsequent works and observation of knowledge flow. Papers that are not cited are ex-cluded from the analysis. The consequence of the exclusion is the isolation of clusters (smaller net-works) that includes documents in which everyone must have at least one connection with another within the cluster. It allows, among others, for easier definition of the thematic cluster scope (Table 3).

Figure 6 outlines a citations network of selected papers (overlay view). As a result, it became possible to determine which publications have the largest number of citations in others (weights) in the entire created network. The total number of citations in the Scopus database was presented using a color scale.

Figure 5. Journals of selected papers.

Table 2. Number of according due to their application and type.

PaperApplication

Academic Industrial Academic & Industrial

Conceptual 28 7 49

Literature review 15 0 10

Case study 5 3 8

Empirical research 3 2 13

Survey 13 0 6

The results depicted that according to the paper types, conceptual studies dominated (84) overliterature reviews (25) and surveys (19). Slightly less represented than the abovementioned paper typesare empirical research (18) and case studies (16). This indicates a visible advantage of theoretical papersover practical ones. When it comes to applications, most of the articles are academic and industrial (86).These papers develop scientific issues and contain references to their applications in industry. It canalso be seen that academic applications (64) significantly outweigh industrial ones (12). This confirmsthe advantage of theoretical works over practical ones.

3.2. Bibliographic Network Analysis

3.2.1. Citation Network Analysis

Citation network analysis (CNA) is a method of network analysis in which papers are presentedin the form of nodes and citations are depicted as links between them. Thanks to the CNA, it is possibleto track the citation network which allows for a better understanding of the impact of previous studieson subsequent works and observation of knowledge flow. Papers that are not cited are excluded fromthe analysis. The consequence of the exclusion is the isolation of clusters (smaller networks) thatincludes documents in which everyone must have at least one connection with another within thecluster. It allows, among others, for easier definition of the thematic cluster scope (Table 3).

Figure 6 outlines a citations network of selected papers (overlay view). As a result, it becamepossible to determine which publications have the largest number of citations in others (weights) in theentire created network. The total number of citations in the Scopus database was presented usinga color scale.

Sustainability 2020, 12, 5650 10 of 29Sustainability 2020, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 31

Figure 6. Citation network.

The network built in this way consists of 88 nodes and 166 links (Figure 6). It is assumed that the CNA gives the best results when clusters consist of many nodes because the amount of information that can be obtained from them is much larger than information from small clusters [67]. Based on this assumption, it presented the 7 (out of 17) largest clusters created by VOSviewer with the most important information associated with them (Table 3).

Table 3. Research topics based on the largest clusters in citation network.

Clus-ter Nodes

Links Main Research Topics

Most Cited Papers in Scopus

(Minimum 20 Cita-tions)

Time Range

Size in the Citation Net-work (i.e., 88 Connected

Nodes) (100%)

1 9 10

product lifecycle manage-ment, performance of smart manufacturing systems, sus-tainable smart manufactur-

ing

[23,68,69] 2012–2020 10%

2 8 10 critical factors of implement-ing I4.0, (Industrial) IoT sup-

porting sustainability [70,71] 2017–

2020 9%

3 7 6 smart manufacturing [65] 2018–2020 8%

4 7 6 circular economy, production

planning and control [72] 2018–2019 8%

5 6 6 circular economy, assessment of I4.0 based on TBL [29,55] 2018–

2019 7%

6 6 7 sustainable supply chain, sustainable I4.0 [15,73] 2018–

2020 7%

Figure 6. Citation network.

The network built in this way consists of 88 nodes and 166 links (Figure 6). It is assumed that theCNA gives the best results when clusters consist of many nodes because the amount of informationthat can be obtained from them is much larger than information from small clusters [67]. Based onthis assumption, it presented the 7 (out of 17) largest clusters created by VOSviewer with the mostimportant information associated with them (Table 3).

Table 3. Research topics based on the largest clusters in citation network.

Cluster Nodes Links Main Research Topics Most Cited Papers in Scopus(Minimum 20 Citations) Time Range Size in the Citation Network (i.e.,

88 Connected Nodes) (100%)

1 9 10

product lifecycle management,performance of smart manufacturing

systems, sustainable smartmanufacturing

[23,68,69] 2012–2020 10%

2 8 10critical factors of implementing I4.0,

(Industrial) IoT supportingsustainability

[70,71] 2017–2020 9%

3 7 6 smart manufacturing [65] 2018–2020 8%

4 7 6 circular economy, productionplanning and control [72] 2018–2019 8%

5 6 6 circular economy, assessment of I4.0based on TBL [29,55] 2018–2019 7%

6 6 7 sustainable supply chain, sustainableI4.0 [15,73] 2018–2020 7%

7 6 5 business models for I4.0, I4.0 in thepharmaceutical sector [74] 2015–2019 7%

To identify the main research topics of clusters, the main references were analyzed, i.e., the paperswith the largest number of citations (Table 3). It should be considered that it is not always necessaryfor all papers assigned to a given cluster to be closely related to its main topic, because the authorssometimes cite works that practically do not relate to the main topic discussed in the article. This mayalso be the case for review papers.

The CNA shows that research related to the integration of sustainability and Industry 4.0 isfragmented and multidisciplinary. The identified research topics were initiated in countries that runprograms related to the Fourth Industrial Revolution: the USA, China, Germany, the United Kingdom,emphasizing their leading role in creating the basis for research on the integration of the concepts ofsustainability and Industry 4.0. As a result of the CNA, seven clusters were outlined.


Cluster 1 presents how smart technologies can help manage a sustainable product life cycle [75].An example of using Big Data Analytics (BDA) in this process is given in [23]. The term sustainablesmart manufacturing (SSM) is also defined and a conceptual framework of BDA in SSM is proposedfrom the lifecycle BDA perspective [23]. The rationale for making decisions based on big data setsin sustainable smart manufacturing is sketched in [24]. This paper also includes state-of-the-artsustainable and smart manufacturing. The studies [68,76,77] discussed the issue of performanceof smart manufacturing systems and proposed possible assessment approaches. In both articlesthe importance of sustainability is emphasized as one of the elements of smart manufacturingassessment. The requirements, platform architecture, functionalities, challenges and opportunities ofsmart manufacturing are presented in [69].

Cluster 2 raises the issue of critical factors for the implementation of Industry 4.0 and emphasizesthe role of IoT in achieving sustainability. An integrative framework for understanding the synergiesbetween I4.0 and environmentally sustainable manufacturing through critical success factors ispresented in [70]. The analysis of factors that enables the realization of sustainable development bycreating knowledge through digitalization is described in [78]. In the paper [56], factors of the influenceof I4.0 on sustainability are included and a model of the structural equation with six hypothesesis proposed. This model is used to quantitatively measure the effects of Lean Manufacturing andIndustry 4.0 in the field of sustainable development. The article [71] states that Smart ProductionSystems (SPS) will integrate the virtual and physical world on IoT platforms to ensure flexibilityand resource efficiency. It also presents sustainability impacts on SPS. Three main potential benefits(transparency, resource efficiency, sustainable energy) for the use of Industrial IoT (IIoT) supportingsustainable development goals are discussed and the results of empirical verification are presentedin the article [79].

Cluster 3 focuses on the issue of smart manufacturing. The general concept of a smart manufacturingenterprise, pillars of smart manufacturing and its possible integration with the supply and distributionchain are presented in [65]. Key drivers of I4.0 and their impact on sustainable supply chain aredescribed in [80]. The possibility of reducing manufacturing conversion costs using real-time datadigitization is outlined in [81]. The importance of modern ICT technologies and digitization of entirevalue chains in Industry 4.0 is highlighted in [82,83]. Business strategy based on the lean-digitizedmanufacturing system in I4.0 era is characterized in [83].

Cluster 4 explains the relationship between Industry 4.0 and circular economy (CE). Paper [72]contains a pioneering roadmap to enhance the application of CE principles in organizations dueto I4.0 approaches. Possibilities of CE support through digital technologies are presented in [25].The article [84] presents an eco-project related to the use of Internet of Things (IoT) and I4.0 technologiesas an effective methodological approach for developing products compatible with the principles ofthe CE. The opportunities of I4.0 support for remanufacturing and CE acceleration are describedin [85]. The cluster also discussed the issues of production planning and control based on Industry 4.0technologies. A mathematical programming model [86] with activity-based costing (ABC) and theoryof constraints (TOC) maximizing profit and reducing carbon dioxide emissions, energy recycling andreuse of waste simultaneously was developed. This model using I4.0 techniques was empiricallyverified in the paper industry [87] and textile industry [88].

Cluster 5 concerns the assessment of the potential of Industry 4.0 to achieve the goals of sustainabledevelopment and to be compliant with the TBL. The results of the qualitative assessment of the potentialI4.0 in the ecological and social perspective are included in the paper [29]. In turn, the paper [89]contains quantitative results of the I4.0 assessment in the context of improving quality managementdue to using the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model. Another article [55] presentsthe risk framework in the context of Industry 4.0 implementation that is related to TBL. The issueof smart and sustainable eMaintenance and the associated TBL-based benefits are discussed in [90].The cluster also includes papers on the topic of the circular economy which emphasize the importanceof this topic (it was also mentioned in Cluster 4). Hence, the conceptual framework for the transition to


a circular economy for Sustainable Supply Chain 4.0 for the healthcare industry is reported in [91].The procedure for introducing the principles of sustainable development in a production environmentby designing a new circular business model (CBM) is described in [92]. This procedure was tested andapproved in an Italian company producing ceramic tiles using the digitization of production processesin the Industry 4.0 environment.

Cluster 6 addresses issues related to the use of Industry 4.0 to achieve a sustainable supply chain(SSC). In paper [73] 18 challenges for I4.0 initiatives regarding SSC were identified and ranked by theAHP method according to their priority. An empirical analysis was made in emerging economies onthe Indian market. The paper [93] continues the previous research [73] identifying 28 challenges relatedto sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) and 22 measures for Industry 4.0 and the circulareconomy. This case study was also carried out in the Indian automotive industry. The combinationof Industry 4.0 and cyber-physical holon [94] enabled researchers to develop the concept of adaptiveand integrated sustainable supply chain management (AISSCM) in emerging economies. The holonicframework allows for integrating smart social metabolism into the natural environment in order toenable co-evolution of the supply chain in the environment. In the article of [95] the term “Supply Chain4.0” is defined for the application of Industry 4.0 technologies in the supply chain aimed at planningwith greater efficiency and better meeting demand. To achieve supply chain 4.0, autonomous vehiclesand equipment were proposed. In the paper [15] which is based on a systematic literature reviewconcerning Industry 4.0, sustainability was indicated as one of the five main research categories in theSustainable Industry 4.0 framework. The impact of I4.0 on sustainable organizational performancein Indian manufacturing companies through lean manufacturing practices is described in [96].

Cluster 7 refers to the development of new business models and organizational structuresusing I4.0 technologies. In [19,74] new organizational approaches to sustainable developmentwere highlighted. An example of a new organizational model is the comprehensive structure“Customer-Product-Process-Resource (CPPR) 4.0” represented by the cycle of creating valuepropositions for the I4.0 environment [97]. The cluster also includes examples of using I4.0 toachieve a sustainable supply chain in the pharmaceutical sector (so-called “Pharma Industry 4.0”or “Pharma 4.0”) [26,98]. The pharmaceutical industry is crucial due to potential benefits of I4.0identified in the empirical research of Thai companies [99]. For this sector, an interesting model,a cyber-physical-based Process Analytical Technology framework (called “CPbPAT”) for implementingsmart manufacturing systems in the pharmaceutical industry was developed [98].

3.2.2. Global Citation Score Analysis

Global Citation Score (GCS) analysis can be used to detect groundbreaking publications. The GCSindicator informs about the total number of citations obtained in the entire database (e.g., Scopus).Studies with a high GCS value are considered groundbreaking or have a significant impact on theassociated field [100]. In other words, GCS allows to identify papers that form the basis of a givenknowledge area and are often used by other authors to develop their studies. It should be noticedthat a high GCS value does not always indicate that the paper has a significant impact and promisingscientific contribution to a given field [54].

The normalized GCS was used to deepen the analyses and detect promising, perspective papersin the field. Its value was determined in two ways: (1) the ratio of cumulative citations in Scopusuntil 2019 to the total number of years since they were published [101]; (2) the ratio of the latestyearly GCS (i.e., for 2019) to the total number of years since it was published [17]. In fact, thisprocess “weighs” cumulative citations or citations received in a given year based on the “lifespan” ofpapers. By normalizing the GCS, it is possible to identify groundbreaking publications that could havea potentially large impact and promising scientific input in the analyzed topic. Groundbreaking papersare not always characterized by high GCS (i.e., the total number of citations in Scopus), although theyare currently attractive to the scientific community. Table 4 contains the twelve most frequently citedpapers ranked by normalized GCS.


Table 4. Ranking of top 12 cited papers in Scopus according to normalized GCS.

Rank Paper Year GCS Appear in the SevenBiggest Citation Clusters

Cumulative GCS up to2019/years Since Publication

GCS in 2019/yearsSince Publication

1 [65] 2018 141 yes 49 38.5

2 [102] 2018 110 no 46.5 35.5

3 [15] 2018 80 yes 28.5 26

4 [72] 2018 84 yes 28.5 24.5

5 [23] 2019 44 yes 24 24

6 [70] 2018 78 yes 28.5 21

7 [55] 2019 23 yes 17 17

8 [73] 2018 52 yes 18.5 15.5

9 [103] 2018 44 no 17.5 14.5

10 [29] 2018 41 yes 16 14.5

11 [13] 2018 37 no 15.5 14.5

12 [104] 2017 70 no 20 12.33

Based on Table 4, it can be concluded that 8 out of 12 papers with the highest normalized GCSbelong to the seven largest clusters identified during the analysis of the co-occurrence of citations(Table 3). This proves that groundbreaking studies do not always have to be included in the maincitation coexistence networks. But it is worth noting that the normalized GCS rankings calculatedin two different ways would differ very slightly. However, there are papers with relatively low GCS(e.g., [55]) and high value of normalized GCS which confirm the correctness of the adopted approach.

Particularly noteworthy are the papers [23,55] which despite their publication in 2019 haverelatively large number of citations. In addition, the first article belongs to the largest citation cluster.Usually, papers get more citations in the years immediately following their publication. In thiscase, it may mean that these papers are breakthrough studies setting out further research directions.The paper [23] is an ordering of existing knowledge related to the use of BDA in sustainable smartmanufacturing (SSM). The article contains a conceptual framework of BDA in SSM from the perspectiveof product lifecycle. The paper also discusses the potential applications and key benefits of BDAin SSM and sets challenges and future research directions for this area. The paper [55] is also treatedas a conceptual article which proposes the framework of risks for implementing Industry 4.0 in thecontext of the triple bottom line. Based on a literature review and interviews with experts, a list ofrisks in five categories (ecological, social, environmental, technical/IT, legal/political) was developedand discussed.

Most of the studies in Table 4 are reviews or conceptual papers. They were described in theCNA analysis. Kusiak [65] pointed to sustainability as one of the pillars of smart manufacturing.Paper [13] presented 4 scenarios regarding the challenges of Industry 4.0 as well as their impact onsustainability. One of the scenarios concerned the integration and compliance of Industry 4.0 with thegoals of sustainable development.

Table 4 also contains papers in which a literature review or conceptual framework was supportedby expert interviews, case studies or empirical analysis. The work [29] provided a qualitative assessmentof the potential for sustainable value creation in Industry 4.0 on a macro and micro scale based ona literature review and expert interviews. The paper [103] presented a case study of a companyimplementing an individualized business model based on the IoT, big data, and analytics. Eight specificfunctionalities, which enable use these technologies regarding CE and sustainability, were identified.The article [104] contains a comprehensive and structured picture of Industrial IoT related to TBLbenefits and challenges based on semi-structured expert interviews driven from German manufacturingcompanies. The work [102] contains a research model on the opportunities and challenges of Industry4.0 as a driver of its implementation in the context of sustainability. To validate this model, a partialleast square structural equation modeling was used for a sample of German manufacturing companies.


3.2.3. Co-Occurrence Network of Authors’ Keywords

Authors’ keywords analysis can be helpful in detecting research trends covering informationcontained in all articles [105]. The following research covers the authors’ keywords of the entire set ofselected papers. This will complement the results obtained from the CNA analysis. Analysis of thecitation network is important because it allows to identify articles and group them into clusters basedon citations. However, the main disadvantage of CNA is that it does not include important papers thatare not associated with any citation (this may be the case especially for new studies). Therefore, thereis a need to support CNA analysis using the authors’ keyword network analysis.

To analyze the authors’ keywords, a co-occurrence (or co-word) network was built [106]. In thisnetwork, the nodes correspond to the authors’ keywords, and the link weights provide informationon how many times the words appear together in the same articles. The basic assumption of theco-occurrence analysis is that the authors’ keywords present an appropriate description of the contentor relations contained in the paper. The existence of many co-occurrences of the same word or pair ofwords may correspond to the research topic and reveal patterns and trends in a discipline [105].

Conducting an analysis of co-occurrence in VOSviewer is possible thanks to three steps:(1) extracting the authors’ keywords from 162 papers selected after screening abstracts in theScopus database, (2) “cleaning” data, i.e., merging synonyms, merging abbreviations with fullterms, and correcting spelling differences, (3) the cleaned data is a batch file used by VOSviewer togenerate a map presenting the authors’ keywords network. The network was created in a way thatkeyword has appear in at least 5 papers to be included in the analysis. The impact of this parametervalue on the network size and number of clusters is described in [54]. Five as the minimum number ofoccurrences of the keyword was proposed in [17,101].

VOSviewer generated 15 nodes which were grouped into 5 clusters (Figure 7). There were 47 linksin the co-occurrence network, and the total link strength was 176. The total link strength was expressedby a positive value that indicates the number of documents where the keywords appear together.The higher this value, the more often a given keyword coexists with others and is more relevant to thenetwork. The nodes were grouped into clusters that do not overlap (i.e., a given keyword can belongto only one cluster). The larger and more transparent a node, the higher the frequency of the keywordin the analyzed set. In turn, the proximity of the location of nodes indicates more frequent than in thecase of distant coexistence in specific sets.Sustainability 2020, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 15 of 31

Figure 7. Co-occurrence network of authors’ keywords.

Detailed information on keywords and clusters is provided in Table 5. The extracted clusters reflect 5 different research topics. Then, research topics are ordered based on the co-occurrence of keywords (i.e., the frequency of keywords appearing in the data set).

Table 5. Research topics in clusters based on authors’ keywords.

Cluster Authors’ Keywords Total Link

Strength Occurrences Main Research Topics

1

smart manufacturing sustainable manufacturing

internet of things big data

cyber-physical systems

24 16 25 22 7

14 14 11 10 7

application of I4.0 technolo-gies (IoT, big data, CPS) to enhance smart and sustain-

able manufacturing

2

industry 4.0 industrial internet of

things sustainable development

digital transformation

107 11 10 12

101 7 7 6

digital transformation and IIoT as the core for sustain-able solutions for industrial systems, I4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development

3 sustainability smart factory digitalization

64 14 6

45 8 5

impact of digitalization on sustainability, sustainabil-ity as a pillar of smart fac-

tory

4 circular economy sustainable supply chain

21 8

15 5

integrating I4.0 with CE and SSC

5 supply chain 5 5 green supply chain, ship-building 4.0 supply chain

Figure 7. Co-occurrence network of authors’ keywords.

Detailed information on keywords and clusters is provided in Table 5. The extracted clustersreflect 5 different research topics. Then, research topics are ordered based on the co-occurrence ofkeywords (i.e., the frequency of keywords appearing in the data set).


Table 5. Research topics in clusters based on authors’ keywords.

Cluster Authors’ Keywords Total Link Strength Occurrences Main Research Topics

1

smart manufacturingsustainable manufacturing

internet of thingsbig data

cyber-physical systems

241625227

141411107

application of I4.0 technologies (IoT, big data, CPS)to enhance smart and sustainable manufacturing

2

industry 4.0industrial internet of things

sustainable developmentdigital transformation

107111012

101776

digital transformation and IIoT as the core forsustainable solutions for industrial systems, I4.0 as

enabler for a sustainable development

3sustainabilitysmart factorydigitalization

64146

4585

impact of digitalization on sustainability,sustainability as a pillar of smart factory

4 circular economysustainable supply chain

218

155 integrating I4.0 with CE and SSC

5 supply chain 5 5 green supply chain, shipbuilding 4.0 supply chain

Cluster 1 focuses on research related to the application of major I4.0 technologies to achievesustainable manufacturing. The paper [107] presents a mathematical model of municipal wastecollection routing using I4.0 technologies (big data, CPS, cloud computing, RFID) which allowsoptimization of the waste collection process. The article [108] presents how industries can use a smartmanagement system (SMgS) that is based on IoT and big data and will allow achieving lean andsustainable systems with less effort than traditional approaches. The study [109] contains a smartfactory framework in which CPS and IoT are indicated as the key elements of I4.0. The developedmodel was validated in a cement plant and the key environmental performance indicators wereimproved. The work [110] depicts a case study of the sensing system of gripping forces which isan IoT-based robotic application and allows considering numerous environmental and social factors.The work [111] describes the development and specification of industrial cyber-physical systems(ICPS). It presents also a service-oriented ICPS model that enables to provide sustainable industrialsystem and more environmentally friendly businesses. The reference framework for the sensing,smart and sustainable product development (S3-Product) based on the Integrated Product, Process,and Manufacturing System Development Reference Model (IPPMD) is presented in [112]. Using theproposed reference framework, Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPSs) can be developed which,in turn it allow sustainability to be improved. The use of one of the concepts of I4.0—Digital Twin toimprove leather cutting efficiency and leather sustainability in the automotive industry is presentedin [113]. The article [114] presents the smart end-of-life (EOL) management framework togetherwith the major procedures of smart recovery decision-making. The model considering economic andenvironmental sustainability has been validated on a belt lifter case study. Another paper [115] dealswith smart manufacturing in the semiconductor industry, in which sustainability is one of the mostcommon topics.

Cluster 2 presents how Industry 4.0 and related issues (digital transformation, IIoT) allow forachieving sustainable environment. In the study [116], collaboration networks were presented as a pillarof I4.0 and digital transformation that enable sustainable solutions and entire business ecosystems.In [27] it was found that digital transformation of manufacturing is synonymous with the concepts of I4.0or smart manufacturing and it was pointed out that one of the advantages of digital manufacturing isthe sustainability improvement. An analysis of intergovernmental organizations documents containedin [117] shows that I4.0 is strongly linked to energy efficiency potentials that could lead to climatechange mitigation and more sustainable energy consumption in the industrial sector. In the paper [118]it was stated that the I4.0 paradigm is aimed at integrating digital technologies with business processesto increase the level of efficiency and develop new business models. The paper discusses the use ofdigital technologies in the field of precision agriculture. Research conducted on German and ChineseSMEs confirms that IIoT provides benefits in the three dimensions of TBL [119]. In [120] a cyber physicalenergy system was developed increasing the energy efficiency of the dyeing process by collecting andanalyzing manufacturing big data through IIoT devices. The work [121] presents the human-machine


interfaces platform, which due to the use of IIoT reduces energy consumption and the entire factorycan be more efficient and sustainable in accordance with the I4.0 paradigm. The study [28] presentsthe concept of SSC Eco System with I4.0 in which digital connection plays a very important rolebecause of IoT. In addition, the presented SSCM assessment framework for I4.0 included a sustainabledevelopment perspective. The issues of achieving the SDGs through I4.0 functions, mainly carbonfootprint (CO2) reduction, were described in [122,123].

Cluster 3 raises issues related to sustainability as one of the main elements of a smart factory andemphasizes the importance of digitization in implementing sustainable development policy. The resultsof surveys among enterprises from Germany and China [124] indicate that the digitalization of industrycreates an opportunity for an ecological dimension of sustainable development. The respondents arealso of the opinion that due to digitalization the assumed improvement of resource efficiency can beachieved, and it may contribute to the increased use of renewable energy. A literature review andthe results of surveys confirming the important role of industrial digitalization in sustainability canbe found in [79]. This research states that better transparency provided by digitalization with IIoTenabled throughout the entire supply chain can lead to better environmental management of companies.For this reason, digitalization is the core of the concept for eMaintenance enabling an increase in theenvironmental sustainability and reduction of natural resources consumption [90]. In turn, in thepaper [125] it was stated in that sustainability is one of the drivers of I4.0 that transforms traditionalfactories into smart factories through digitalization. The study also includes a discussion on the impactof I4.0 on TBL and the interactions between the TBL dimensions. The study [24] found that duringdesigning and implementing smart factories, sustainability and energy efficiency should be importantgoals. Based on the literature review, the issue of energy efficiency and enhancing sustainabilityin smart factories was investigated. In [126], it was stated that a smart factory is usually associatedwith sustainability and presents an integrated architecture for implementing extended producerresponsibility programs using I4.0. A new Enterprise 4.0 framework was presented in paper [19]in which sustainability plays an emerging feature in business models.

Cluster 4 discusses the issue of using Industry 4.0 in the concepts of CE and SSC. In the paper [127]some barriers of Industry 4.0, which hinder the achievement of CE, are discussed. In turn, the paper [128]presents the theoretical framework for the integration of Industry 4.0 and CE. This study includesan analysis of how integration of I4.0 with CE business models will allow to be compliant with CEprinciples. The work [129] emphasizes the potential of Industry 4.0 for the sharing economy, which isone of CE’s business models. It was found that I4.0 can play an important role in unlocking the sharingeconomy. Research findings in [91] prove that the relationships between TBL, I4.0 and corporate socialresponsibility allow to make the transition from a linear model to a circular model and can improve thehealthcare sustainable supply chain 4.0. The paper [94] contains a conceptual framework presentingthe relationship between social metabolism (flows of materials and energy that occur between natureand society, between different societies, and within societies), SSC, CE, and enablers from I4.0 and theholonic paradigm. The significance of the proposed conceptual framework lies in the integration ofSSC with I4.0, CE and the sustainability pillars. The study [93] presents a framework to overcomethe challenges of SSCM through I4.0 and solutions based on the CE which was validated in theautomotive organization.

Cluster 5 addresses the issue of I4.0 impact on the green supply chain. Paper [130] presents theframework for green supply chain management in existence of I4.0, which was verified in 2 companies.The article [131] outlines a conceptual model of the supply chain for the shipbuilding industry based onthe supply chain paradigms (Lean, Agile, Resilience, Green—LARG) and I4.0. Since the shipbuildingindustry has a special interest in adapting to the changes proposed by I4.0, the term “Shipbuilding 4.0”appeared in [132]. A special index based on LARG paradigm was developed in [132] which allows toadapt quicker and more efficiently the supply chain to Industry 4.0.


3.2.4. Burst Detection Analysis

A burst detection is based on Kleinberg’s Burst Detection algorithm [133]. The algorithm enablesto detect the evolution of literature in the field. It may be seen as a series of appearing topics thatare developed for a certain span of time, and then disappear [133]. This algorithm thus ensurestime ordering by identifying the increasing and decreasing visibility of individual research topics.More precisely, Kleinberg’s approach for detecting series is based on modeling the stream of generatedkeywords that reflect research topics. The appearance of a given keyword in the paper stream issignaled by the “burst of activity”. When the term becomes common, it is no longer considered tobe bursting [134]. This is the key difference between the series detection measure and the simplermeasure of the frequency of keywords over time.

Burst detection gives an insight into the popularity of authors’ keywords over time which isan extension of the co-occurrence network of authors’ keywords. This makes it easier to determinefuture research directions. Burst detection was implemented to normalized authors’ keywords thatappeared in the selected papers. Normalization included adapting all word tokens to lowercaseletters, not including stop words, removing plurals and deleted dots from initialisms or acronyms.The CiteSpace software was used and the results of the algorithm application are shown in Figure 8.


Figure 8. Burst detection results for normalized authors’ keywords from 2012–2019.

CiteSpace detected 9 keywords characterized by bursts of activity (Figure 8). The bursts of flow control and manufacture in 2015 and their strength confirm the great interest of research in manufac-turing, industrial engineering and logistics. It is worth noting that in research done between 2015 and 2017 regarding the relation between Industry 4.0 and sustainability, some keywords were very pop-ular: agility of manufacturing systems [76,77], economics [69,104,112,135,136], decision making [69,135,137,138].

The interest in specific industrial research and themes of industrial production emerged later, in 2017. According to [29,125] the increase in the appearance of the keyword industrial research in the years 2016–2019 confirms researchers’ interest in overcoming the lack of empirical research, case studies and industrial applications. Referring to the latest research, there is a great focus in Industry 4.0 and digitalization [78,80,103,124,139,140] paradigms. The main burst is related to Industry 4.0 (2017–2019, strength: 1.5285). This means that the research interest in this topic has increased in recent years. The results are consistent with the results obtained from GCS analyses and the main research topics identified by VOS clustering. In fact, Industry 4.0 allows the use of many modern technologies that help achieve the SDGs meeting the TBL.

Burst detection confirmed (e.g., highlighting manufacturing and industrial production as the main areas of research, paying attention to the lack of empirical research, case studies and industrial applications, economics as an important reference point) and complemented earlier analyses (e.g., indication of relevant studies related to agility and decision making in the context of Industry 4.0 and sustainability). So, burst analysis also helped to more easily identify the differences between CNA, GCS and co-occurrence network of authors’ keywords. For example, only co-occurrence network of authors’ keywords indicated digitalization as an emerging topic. In summary, the results of the burst detection analysis deepen further and consolidate the findings arising from the previously used bib-liometric tools.

It was also decided to use burst detection algorithm for the top-cited articles among the selected papers. The results are presented in Figure 9.

Figure 9. Burst detection results for cited journals from 2012–2019.

Two articles are characterized by burst of activity: “Smart manufacturing” [69] and “Sustaina-bility in manufacturing, and factories of the future” [141]. Both papers raise issues related to the de-velopment of manufacturing. The work [69] states that smart manufacturing will meet the expecta-tions related to environmental sustainability. The paper [141] presents the holistic understanding of a factory of the future, one of whose essential elements is sustainability in manufacturing. It was not


CiteSpace detected 9 keywords characterized by bursts of activity (Figure 8). The burstsof flow control and manufacture in 2015 and their strength confirm the great interest of researchin manufacturing, industrial engineering and logistics. It is worth noting that in research donebetween 2015 and 2017 regarding the relation between Industry 4.0 and sustainability, somekeywords were very popular: agility of manufacturing systems [76,77], economics [69,104,112,135,136],decision making [69,135,137,138].

The interest in specific industrial research and themes of industrial production emerged later, in 2017.According to [29,125] the increase in the appearance of the keyword industrial research in the years2016–2019 confirms researchers’ interest in overcoming the lack of empirical research, case studiesand industrial applications. Referring to the latest research, there is a great focus in Industry 4.0 anddigitalization [78,80,103,124,139,140] paradigms. The main burst is related to Industry 4.0 (2017–2019,strength: 1.5285). This means that the research interest in this topic has increased in recent years.The results are consistent with the results obtained from GCS analyses and the main research topicsidentified by VOS clustering. In fact, Industry 4.0 allows the use of many modern technologies thathelp achieve the SDGs meeting the TBL.

Burst detection confirmed (e.g., highlighting manufacturing and industrial production asthe main areas of research, paying attention to the lack of empirical research, case studies andindustrial applications, economics as an important reference point) and complemented earlier analyses(e.g., indication of relevant studies related to agility and decision making in the context of Industry 4.0and sustainability). So, burst analysis also helped to more easily identify the differences between CNA,GCS and co-occurrence network of authors’ keywords. For example, only co-occurrence networkof authors’ keywords indicated digitalization as an emerging topic. In summary, the results of the


burst detection analysis deepen further and consolidate the findings arising from the previously usedbibliometric tools.

It was also decided to use burst detection algorithm for the top-cited articles among the selectedpapers. The results are presented in Figure 9.



CiteSpace detected 9 keywords characterized by bursts of activity (Figure 8). The bursts of flow control and manufacture in 2015 and their strength confirm the great interest of research in manufac-turing, industrial engineering and logistics. It is worth noting that in research done between 2015 and 2017 regarding the relation between Industry 4.0 and sustainability, some keywords were very pop-ular: agility of manufacturing systems [76,77], economics [69,104,112,135,136], decision making [69,135,137,138].

The interest in specific industrial research and themes of industrial production emerged later, in 2017. According to [29,125] the increase in the appearance of the keyword industrial research in the years 2016–2019 confirms researchers’ interest in overcoming the lack of empirical research, case studies and industrial applications. Referring to the latest research, there is a great focus in Industry 4.0 and digitalization [78,80,103,124,139,140] paradigms. The main burst is related to Industry 4.0 (2017–2019, strength: 1.5285). This means that the research interest in this topic has increased in recent years. The results are consistent with the results obtained from GCS analyses and the main research topics identified by VOS clustering. In fact, Industry 4.0 allows the use of many modern technologies that help achieve the SDGs meeting the TBL.

Burst detection confirmed (e.g., highlighting manufacturing and industrial production as the main areas of research, paying attention to the lack of empirical research, case studies and industrial applications, economics as an important reference point) and complemented earlier analyses (e.g., indication of relevant studies related to agility and decision making in the context of Industry 4.0 and sustainability). So, burst analysis also helped to more easily identify the differences between CNA, GCS and co-occurrence network of authors’ keywords. For example, only co-occurrence network of authors’ keywords indicated digitalization as an emerging topic. In summary, the results of the burst detection analysis deepen further and consolidate the findings arising from the previously used bib-liometric tools.

It was also decided to use burst detection algorithm for the top-cited articles among the selected papers. The results are presented in Figure 9.


Two articles are characterized by burst of activity: “Smart manufacturing” [69] and “Sustaina-bility in manufacturing, and factories of the future” [141]. Both papers raise issues related to the de-velopment of manufacturing. The work [69] states that smart manufacturing will meet the expecta-tions related to environmental sustainability. The paper [141] presents the holistic understanding of a factory of the future, one of whose essential elements is sustainability in manufacturing. It was not


Two articles are characterized by burst of activity: “Smart manufacturing” [69] and “Sustainabilityin manufacturing, and factories of the future” [141]. Both papers raise issues related to the developmentof manufacturing. The work [69] states that smart manufacturing will meet the expectations relatedto environmental sustainability. The paper [141] presents the holistic understanding of a factory ofthe future, one of whose essential elements is sustainability in manufacturing. It was not includedin selected papers and, therefore, was not the subject of previous analyses. This confirms the advantagesof using a burst detection algorithm, as well as its complementarity with other bibliometric tools.

3.3. Reference Framework “Sustainable Industry 4.0”

Grounding on cluster analysis depicted in previous chapters, the reference framework wasconstructed (Figure 10).


included in selected papers and, therefore, was not the subject of previous analyses. This confirms the advantages of using a burst detection algorithm, as well as its complementarity with other bibli-ometric tools.

3.3. Reference Framework “Sustainable Industry 4.0”

Grounding on cluster analysis depicted in previous chapters, the reference framework was con-structed (Figure 10).

Figure 10. Sustainable Industry 4.0 reference framework based on SLNA from 2012–2019.

The goal of this framework is to serve as a kind of manual and guideline for Industry 4.0 appli-cations supporting sustainability principles. The use of framework is based on selection of which sustainability issues are planned to be addressed or defined as critical by an organization. Then,

Figure 10. Sustainable Industry 4.0 reference framework based on SLNA from 2012–2019.

The goal of this framework is to serve as a kind of manual and guideline for Industry 4.0applications supporting sustainability principles. The use of framework is based on selection ofwhich sustainability issues are planned to be addressed or defined as critical by an organization.


Then, search term is to be found in the framework and next, one may find which I4.0 topics and theirrelations with the selected sustainability issue were discussed in the literature. There is reference givento the clusters where more details, case studies, best practices could be found. The reverse procedure isapplied if one is seeking for possible impacts of planned I4.0 applications on sustainability (Figure 11).After finding the cluster with the topics of interest, one may use GCS values to seek for the mostprominent papers in the cluster and start own research from this point. In Figure 10, papers with thehighest GCS are listed in bold.


search term is to be found in the framework and next, one may find which I4.0 topics and their rela-tions with the selected sustainability issue were discussed in the literature. There is reference given to the clusters where more details, case studies, best practices could be found. The reverse procedure is applied if one is seeking for possible impacts of planned I4.0 applications on sustainability (Figure 11). After finding the cluster with the topics of interest, one may use GCS values to seek for the most prominent papers in the cluster and start own research from this point. In Figure 10, papers with the highest GCS are listed in bold.

Figure 11. Sustainable Industry 4.0 reference framework—application procedures.

The implication of the framework may result from the industrial use of emerging technologies distributing the sustainable value propositions in an Industry 4.0 environment. The Sustainable In-dustry 4.0 reference framework is divided into two separate application procedures which depict a logical order of activities of:

• how I4.0 implements selected ideas of sustainability; • how sustainability principles are supported by planned I4.0 application.

The first procedure starts with finding out sustainability issues of interest and I4.0 related topics in the framework. Using the search, a network composed of linked clusters and articles can be re-ceived. In the second procedure a similar sequence of activities was applied. A group of related pa-pers and related clusters that explore how principles are supported by planned I4.0 application may be found using browse.

The application of the sustainable Industry 4.0 reference framework needs to support the devel-opment of real-time data-based functions or systems addressing the specific industrial domain sec-tors. The interrelated elements of the framework provide synergy where processes, Industry 4.0 prin-ciples, digital platforms must be interfaced.

The presented framework is of a general nature, therefore it is applicable in a wide variety of organizations. Its strengths are simplicity, clarity and ease of use. However, for specific cases one may need to extend the framework and include details on a lower level, such as guidelines for par-ticular I4.0 technologies or sustainability issues.

4. Discussion and Future Research Directions

When analyzing the framework (Figure 10), one may notice that relations are unidirectional, i.e., I4.0 supports implementation of sustainability concepts. There are no papers reporting research on reverse relations, i.e., how selected sustainability concepts could support implementation of selected I4.0 technologies.

The research discovered a gap in the literature. There was lack of research approaching issues of sustainability and Industry 4.0 in a comprehensive way. There are frameworks existing and find-ings on barriers, success factors, the state of the art of I4.0 implementation in selected economies,

Figure 11. Sustainable Industry 4.0 reference framework—application procedures.

The implication of the framework may result from the industrial use of emerging technologiesdistributing the sustainable value propositions in an Industry 4.0 environment. The SustainableIndustry 4.0 reference framework is divided into two separate application procedures which depicta logical order of activities of:

• how I4.0 implements selected ideas of sustainability;• how sustainability principles are supported by planned I4.0 application.

The first procedure starts with finding out sustainability issues of interest and I4.0 related topicsin the framework. Using the search, a network composed of linked clusters and articles can be received.In the second procedure a similar sequence of activities was applied. A group of related papers andrelated clusters that explore how principles are supported by planned I4.0 application may be foundusing browse.

The application of the sustainable Industry 4.0 reference framework needs to support thedevelopment of real-time data-based functions or systems addressing the specific industrial domainsectors. The interrelated elements of the framework provide synergy where processes, Industry 4.0principles, digital platforms must be interfaced.

The presented framework is of a general nature, therefore it is applicable in a wide variety oforganizations. Its strengths are simplicity, clarity and ease of use. However, for specific cases one mayneed to extend the framework and include details on a lower level, such as guidelines for particularI4.0 technologies or sustainability issues.

4. Discussion and Future Research Directions

When analyzing the framework (Figure 10), one may notice that relations are unidirectional,i.e., I4.0 supports implementation of sustainability concepts. There are no papers reporting research onreverse relations, i.e., how selected sustainability concepts could support implementation of selectedI4.0 technologies.

The research discovered a gap in the literature. There was lack of research approaching issues ofsustainability and Industry 4.0 in a comprehensive way. There are frameworks existing and findingson barriers, success factors, the state of the art of I4.0 implementation in selected economies, industries,research directions presented by researchers [142,143]. However, this research did not aim to extendexisting frameworks or detail them. It was aimed to cover the above-mentioned gap by mapping


I4.0 technologies and sustainability concepts through description of their relations evidenced fromliterature review. Findings from the literature review presented in this paper lead to a recommendationto put more focus on sustainability issues when implementing I4.0 as these problems have not gainedproper attention. Even though some research papers tackling I4.0 and sustainability together werefound, they were not complex, i.e., focused on specific sustainability concept, dimension or specificI4.0 technology. This shortcoming of the existing literature made impossible a holistic approach to theassessment of I4.0 applications on all triple bottom line dimensions of sustainability. The frameworkdeveloped in this paper covers this gap as it forms signposts for decision makers, where they can findevidence on possible impacts of I4.0 on sustainability.

To develop the roadmap to Industry 4.0 the bibliometric analysis of the selected papers was usedinstead of the citation method (the most popular in systematic reviews), aiming to minimize anymistakes regarding the accuracy of the information. It prevented the exclusion of essential papers,information and strengthen the results due to use of wide scientific research databases. In the futureresearch, the authors will validate this target sample using the citation method to select relevant papersby searching using query keywords. The advantage of the cross-search tool is to retrieve any importantpapers cited in the body of literature compared to the previous method relying on the use of theselected academic databases and search terms. The decision of how the method will be applied in theliterature research is a hot spot of arguments. The application of large research databases allows to dothe exhaustive analysis, on one hand, but on the other hand may lead to misinterpretation of findings.

The bibliometric analysis showed that the topic is very vivid and motivates future researchin an investigation of how the technology portfolio of Industry 4.0 could allow to achieve the 17 majorgoals of sustainable development. Among many challenges and opportunities which are already beingexamined are understanding of the SDG goals and translating them into unification of indicators/targetsacross industries in terms of specific functions. It requires to set normative values and then thresholdlevels for material, energy consumption, etc. It seems that Industry 4.0 has been developing in manyindustries considering holistic paradigm. Therefore, more focus on separate research on the connectivityof sustainability and Industry 4.0 with benefits from their integration in the fields of interest is needed.In addition, application of the current sustainability assessment tools such as LCA, LCC, SLCAembodied in an advanced IT framework might provide added value.

On the other hand, the development of smart technologies is still growing and leading to dramaticenvironmental burdens. First, traditional methods for measuring harmful impact are unable toestimate such impact. Second, assessment of the contribution of I4.0 in supporting sustainability isstill missing [29]. That is why a research gap appears between the sustainability assessment field andtechnologies represented by a specific sector. A new potential for strengthening this research directionis seen in modelling decision-making mechanisms.

The benefits of combining sustainability with I4.0 could be found. In particular, the paper sketcheschallenges for Industry 4.0 and its potential in the context of sustainability. By combining sustainabilityto findings of research on I4.0 which have not been done yet, this current study stream has beencomplemented. It leads to the development of a new concept of sustainable Industry 4.0 leveraginga greater efficiency of functions or actions through using IT-based technologies (connectivity oftechnologies with resources, organizational structures, skills, employee empowerment, etc.) A mutualcollaboration between efforts of I4.0 and sustainability issues can achieve advantages at the same time:bringing knowledge, economies of scale, fair distribution of cost, experts’ experiences, industry-specificdata exchange and storage. This high coordination of efforts allows for creating a sustainability-drivenbusiness model in a (eco)system. The advantages of this interrelation might be strengthened if theemerging technologies could be compared and assessed considering sustainability dimensions.

For further study, another point could be highlighted to incorporate expert knowledge, experience,and sustainability assessment methods and map them into the Sustainable Industry 4.0 referenceframework to provide a synergistic effect.

Based on the research done by the authors answers to each research question were provided:


• RQ1. How applications of Industry 4.0 can contribute to sustainable development?

It enables achieving circular economy paradigms (see clusters: 4 and 5 co-citation, 4 co-occurrenceof keywords).

It enables sustainable supply chains and value chains (see clusters: 3 and 6 co-citation, 4 and 5co-occurrence of keywords).

It enables new sustainable business models (see Cluster 7 co-citation).It enables monitoring of the full product life cycle (see Cluster 1 co-citation).Answering this question, synergy exists between I4.0 and sustainability due to digital technology.

By using I4.0-technology affecting sustainability through the responsible, effective use of resources,circular economy can be reached. The concept lying on decentralization of manufacturing whichembodied in an IT technology framework was the response to the pressure on changing conventionalbusiness models in order to develop new sustainable business models (circular business model).An indispensable way to achieve CE is based on technologies which are often successful whencombined with IoT. Industry 4.0 can act as a driver of redesign of traditional supply chains aiming atresource efficiency and circularity.

The I4.0 technologies, e.g., sensors deployed in many machines enable the tracking of productionperformance and product data over the full product life cycle. In consequence, an analysis of collecteddata results in productivity improvements.

• RQ2. How Industry 4.0 technologies and tools can be integrated into sustainability practices ona theoretical and practical basis?

Mainly IoT, digitization, sensors and big data could be employed to monitor sustainability.The study confirms that IIoT is an important element of Industry 4.0 and has an impact on

sustainability. In future studies, the authors will undoubtedly pay more attention to the importance ofIIoT in the context of Sustainable Industry 4.0.

Smart technologies of Big Data Analytics, sensors, etc. displaced conventional computer-aidedmanufacturing industry to deliver tremendous business values or outcomes. On one hand, it providessocio-economic values, on the other hand, it creates challenges for doing scientific research on thereal-time speed of manufacturing data and data storage.

The application of Industry 4.0 technologies and tools in an efficient way should give opportunitiesto manage big data (acquisition, extraction, transmission, storage).

The I4.0 technologies can help to reduce both machine operational time and waste thanks to moreeffective machine and resources utilization consequently ensuring cost-effective operation. Sensors usedin production allow to gather a machine’s status data to analyze load of machines, reducing downtimeand protecting products against unexpected failures which have a great impact on product quality.

• RQ3. What are the main approaches/methodologies/frameworks/tools that should be consideredfor integrating Industry 4.0 with sustainable development?

Critical success factors were discussed in the literature (see Cluster 2—co-citation). Regarding thethird question, coalesced with the second one, the paper addressed some of the critical success factorsfor the use of IoT, e.g., transparency, resource efficiency, creating knowledge through digitalizationthat impacts the achievement of sustainability. The identified factors, which interact with IoT system,sensors, etc., contribute to SDGs. It would also support Sustainable Industry 4.0 reference frameworkimplementation in manufacturing. On the other hand, some factors might hinder the readiness toimplement 4.0 technology. By incorporation of digitalization as a binder of the factors, sustainabilityperformance in the production environment could be measured and monitored, tracking data in realtime. In this sense, it leads to an increase in resource efficiency, reducing inefficient work, revealing coststreated as inefficient when using the latest technology. Thanks to the capturing of massive data,production can be now deeply analyzed and reliable information about production efficiency is stillavailable and up-to-date.


Effective use of critical success factors and approaches pertaining to Industry 4.0 allow the fosteringof sustainability in smart data-driven manufacturing.

5. Conclusions

The depicted research introduced contributions in literature review based on SLNA methodology.This bibliometric analysis and the reference framework constitute the novelty delivered in this article.The combination of SLR and BNAV allowed to place an emphasis on the relation between sustainabilityand Industry 4.0 which presents new challenges in many sectors. This study was clustered basedon relevant journals, keywords or specific thematic fields. The results demonstrated the relationshipbetween sustainability and Industry 4.0 across different sectors or specific functions. It may helpresearchers and practitioners to understand the scale of interest and implications, while on the otherhand contributing theoretically to the development of the topic.

The article was aimed at rationalizing and systematizing the existing body of scientific literaturefocused on combining the concepts of sustainability and Industry 4.0. To achieve the aim, variousquantitative bibliometric analyses were conducted based on algorithms and software tools whichresulted in a dynamic presentation of research progress on the interaction of both concepts overtime. In this way, a broad picture of the theoretical and practical combination of sustainability andIndustry 4.0 was presented, and the main research trends were identified, and future research directionswere proposed.

In terms of theoretical implications, this study is an extension of knowledge about the integrationof the concepts of sustainability and Industry 4.0. It makes a valuable contribution to current knowledgein this area by analyzing the development of this issue, presenting trends and emerging topics that havenot been sufficiently developed and require further research. The application of SLNA methodology toa relatively new research area should be considered an additional theoretical implication that mayfacilitate the use of SLNA in other fields. The adopted methodology allowed to obtain a full pictureof the field due to the use of a citation network and an authors’ keywords network. The separatedclusters allowed to identify and discuss the most important research topics, as well as to identifykey publications. Moreover, the presented methodology could be tailored to specific industry-basedtechnology showing an impact on environmental, economic and social sustainability simultaneously.

The obtained results were confirmed and enriched using GCS and a burst detection algorithm,which complemented the analyses in the adopted methodology. The article may form the basis forfurther development of knowledge in the considered area by identifying key issues and problems,emerging trends and trajectories of evolution.

The article also has implications for practitioners and academia. It is the first comprehensive studyon the integration of the concept of sustainability and Industry 4.0. The comprehensive study presentsinformation on the current state of knowledge and sets out future research directions. As stated at thebeginning of the paper, investigation regarding opportunities for the integration of the concepts ofsustainability and Industry 4.0 was missing. The use of bibliometric analyses to identify the possibilitiesof supporting the implementation of SDGs and TBL through Industry 4.0 should be considered asa valuable investigation tool for assessing the current state of knowledge. Thanks to the presentedresearch results, information was also provided on what the scientific and industrial communitiesshould focus on to enable the effective interaction of sustainability and Industry 4.0. The resultswould mean an input to realize sustainability in Industry 4.0 for these companies, which have notyet implemented any form of intervention measure. In a future perspective this action might allowto gather data to benchmark and convert information into smart data which really needed to befully digitalized.

The bibliometric analysis provides a visualization of scientific research output in finding linksbetween Industry 4.0 and sustainability to draw a roadmap to Sustainable Industry 4.0. It was aimedat helping to explicate and describe the reference framework through determination of these links,promoting the kind of patterns of an IT-based business model and impact of sustainable Industry 4.0.


It is not the intention of the article to look for deep convergences from previous studies in Industry4.0, but rather to cover new ground by examining the recent literature in this field to discoverrelationships between Industry 4.0 and sustainability, thus promoting sustainable I4.0 that can beundertaken by policy makers. In this context, the convergence or inclusion of the emerging I4.0technologies with sustainable goals requires supportive measures and specific policies to ensure thecompetitiveness of local actors suggesting that the development of technological capabilities thatcan contribute to operational competitiveness, firm reputation and the sustainable performance offirms. In the area of practical implication, the proposed integrated framework is expected to driveopportunities to act proactively by decision makers through embodying the I4.0 technologies on ITplatforms to ensure the sustainability of the 4P (performance, product, process, people). The engagementof policy makers at the beginning stage of the inclusion of sophisticated IT-based production systemsin sustainability could help them to anticipate the nature of technology impacts, and, as a consequence,to reshape Industry 4.0. The results outlined that beside a huge theoretical contribution to Industry4.0 and sustainability, many papers do not provide an insight into practical implications to introduceSustainable Industry 4.0.

The analyses carried out also have some limitations. Literature reviews using bibliometric toolsmay ignore important details of studies despite providing a clear summary and ordering of existingpapers. The main disadvantage is the inclusion of citations or keywords that do not always fully reflectthe real contribution of the articles for a given area of knowledge. Researchers very often cite worksthat already have many citations (the so-called “Matthew effect”). This is mainly because such articlesare considered reliable sources of information due to their reputation or popularity. Keywords do notalways accurately reflect the content of the article, and some keywords may be omitted when buildingthe network, because they do not meet the conditions of coexistence. Another disadvantage is theapplication for bibliometric analyses of data collected from one database only—Scopus, which, althoughcomprehensive and prestigious, contains only a small fraction of all scientific publications. The researchwas limited only to articles from peer-reviewed journals, and thus omitted, e.g., conference papers orbook chapters, which may also be a valuable source of information.

Author Contributions: K.E. worked on the table of content, research design and methodology, the assessmentof data using bibliometric software, wrote Materials and Methods, Results, Conclusions and prepared the firstdraft. B.G. supported Materials and Methods (especially with illustration of the methodology), conducted burstdetection analysis, worked on Reference Framework, Discussion and Conclusions, was responsible for preparingfigures and revised the final draft. A.K. worked on the Introduction, Discussion, Conclusions and revised the finaldraft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding: This research is partially funded by a grant for employees of the Warsaw University of Technology,“The synergy and anergy effects of Industry 4.0, sustainable development and lean management”.

Acknowledgments: We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments that allowed to furtherenhance the outcome of this research.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Kagermann, H.; Lukas, W.; Wahlster, W. Industrie 4.0–Mitdem Internet er Dinge auf dem Wegzur 4.Industriellen Revolution [Industry 4.0: With the Internet of Things towards 4th Industrial Revolution].VDI nachrichten, 2011, 13–2011. Available online: https://www.dfki.de/fileadmin/user_upload/DFKI/Medien/News_Media/Presse/Presse-Highlights/vdinach2011a13-ind4.0-Internet-Dinge.pdf (accessed on19 June 2020).

2. Kagermann, H.; Wahlster, W.; Helbig, J. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie4.0: Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. National Academy of Science and Engineering. 2013.Available online: https://www.din.de/blob/76902/e8cac883f42bf28536e7e8165993f1fd/recommendations-for-implementing-industry-4-0-data.pdf (accessed on 30 March 2020).

3. Kumar, S.; Suhaib, M.; Asjad, M. Industry 4.0: Complex, disruptive, but inevitable. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev.2020, 11, 43–51. [CrossRef]

https://www.dfki.de/fileadmin/user_upload/DFKI/Medien/News_Media/Presse/Presse-Highlights/vdinach2011a13-ind4.0-Internet-Dinge.pdf

https://www.dfki.de/fileadmin/user_upload/DFKI/Medien/News_Media/Presse/Presse-Highlights/vdinach2011a13-ind4.0-Internet-Dinge.pdf

https://www.din.de/blob/76902/e8cac883f42bf28536e7e8165993f1fd/recommendations-for-implementing-industry-4-0-data.pdf

https://www.din.de/blob/76902/e8cac883f42bf28536e7e8165993f1fd/recommendations-for-implementing-industry-4-0-data.pdf

http://dx.doi.org/10.24425/mper.2020.132942


4. Scheer, A.W. CIM Computer Integrated Manufacturing: Towards the Factory of the Future; Springer-Verlag:Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012.

5. Xu, L.D.; Xu, E.L.; Li, L. Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 2941–2962.[CrossRef]

6. Adamik, A.; Nowicki, M. Preparedness of Companies for Digital Transformation and Creating a CompetitiveAdvantage in the Age of Industry 4.0. Proc. Int. Conf. Bus. Excell. 2018, 12, 10–24. [CrossRef]

7. Adamik, A. SMEs on the way to SMART World of Industry 4.0. In Eurasian Business Perspectives, Proceedings ofthe 25th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference; Huseyin Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Ucal, M.S.,Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 139–156. [CrossRef]

8. Basl, J. Pilot study of readiness of czech companies to implement the principles of Industry 4.0. Manag. Prod.Eng. Rev. 2017, 8, 3–8. [CrossRef]

9. Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Sharma, R. Analysis of the driving and dependence power of barriers toadopt industry 4.0 in Indian manufacturing industry. Comput Ind. 2018, 101, 107–119. [CrossRef]

10. Lee, S.M.; Trimi, S. Innovation for creating a smart future. J. Innov. Knowl. 2018, 3, 1–8. [CrossRef]11. United Nations. A/RES/70/1 Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Available online: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2020).

12. Franciosi, C.; Iung, B.; Miranda, S.; Riemma, S. Maintenance for sustainability in the Industry 4.0 context:A scoping literature review. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 903–908. [CrossRef]

13. Bonilla, S.H.; Silva, H.R.O.; da Silva, M.T.; Gonçalves, R.F.; Sacomano, J.B. Industry 4.0 and sustainabilityimplications: A scenario-based analysis of the impacts and challenges. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3740. [CrossRef]

14. Ghobakhloo, M. The future of manufacturing industry: A strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. J. Manuf.Technol. Manag. 2018, 29, 910–936. [CrossRef]

15. Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Gawankar, S.A. Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literaturereview identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 117, 408–425.[CrossRef]

16. Peukert, B.; Benecke, S.; Clavell, J.; Neugebauer, S.; Nissen, N.F.; Uhlmann, E.; Finkbeiner, M. Addressingsustainability and flexibility in manufacturing via smart modular machine tools frames to support sustainablevalue creation. Procedia CIRP 2015, 29, 514–519. [CrossRef]

17. Strozzi, F.; Colicchia, C.; Creazza, A.; Noè, C. Literature review on the ‘Smart Factory’ concept usingbibliometric tools. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 6572–6591. [CrossRef]

18. Fahimnia, B.; Sarkis, J.; Davarzani, H. Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis.Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 162, 101–114. [CrossRef]

19. Tirabeni, L.; De Bernardi, P.; Forliano, C.; Franco, M. How can organisations and business models lead toa more sustainable society? A framework from a systematic review of the Industry 4.0. Sustainability 2019,11, 6363. [CrossRef]

20. Seuring, S.; Müller, M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chainmanagement. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1699–1710. [CrossRef]

21. Liao, Y.; Deschamps, F.; de Freitas Rocha Loures, E.; Ramos, L.F.P. Past, present and future of industry 4.0-asystematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 3609–3629. [CrossRef]

22. Pereira, A.C.; Romero, F. A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept.Procedia Manuf. 2017, 13, 1206–1214. [CrossRef]

23. Ren, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sakao, T.; Huisingh, D.; Almeida, C.M.V.B. A comprehensive review of big dataanalytics throughout product lifecycle to support sustainable smart manufacturing: A framework, challengesand future research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 210, 1343–1365. [CrossRef]

24. Meng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Chung, H.; Lee, P.-H.; Shao, C. Enhancing sustainability and energy efficiency in smartfactories: A review. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4779. [CrossRef]

25. Okorie, O.; Salonitis, K.; Charnley, F.; Moreno, M.; Turner, C.; Tiwari, A. Digitisation and the circular economy:A review of current research and future trends. Energies 2018, 11, 3009. [CrossRef]

26. Ding, B. Pharma Industry 4.0: Literature review and research opportunities in sustainable pharmaceuticalsupply chains. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 119, 115–130. [CrossRef]

27. Savastano, M.; Amendola, C.; Bellini, B.; D’Ascenzo, F. Contextual impacts on industrial processes broughtby the digital transformation of manufacturing: A systematic review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 891. [CrossRef]

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806

http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0003

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35051-2_10

http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mper-2017-0012

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.06.004

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.11.001

https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf

https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.459

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10103740

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.181

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1326643

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11226363

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.032


http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10124779

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en11113009


http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11030891


28. Manavalan, E.; Jayakrishna, K. A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain forindustry 4.0 requirements. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 127, 925–953. [CrossRef]

29. Stock, T.; Obenaus, M.; Kunz, S.; Kohl, H. Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitativeassessment of its ecological and social potential. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 118, 254–267. [CrossRef]

30. Joshi, A. Comparison between Scopus and ISI Web of Science. J. Glob. Values 2016, 7, 1–11.31. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus. In Proceedings of the 16th

International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Wuhan, China,16–20 October 2017; pp. 1087–1092.

32. Powell, K.; Peterson, S.R. Coverage and Quality: A comparison of Web of Science and Scopus databases forreporting faculty nursing publication metrics. Nurs. Outlook 2017, 65, 572–578. [CrossRef]

33. Colicchia, C.; Strozzi, F. Supply chain risk management: A new methodology for a systematic literaturereview. Supply Chain Manag. 2012, 17, 403–418. [CrossRef]

34. Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed managementknowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [CrossRef]

35. Rousseau, D.M.; Manning, J.; Denyer, D. Evidence in management and organizational science: Assemblingthe field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2008, 2, 475–515.[CrossRef]

36. Denyer, D.; Tranfield, D. Producing a systematic review. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational ResearchMethods; Buchanan, D., Bryman, A., Eds.; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2009; pp. 671–689.

37. Hummon, N.P.; Doreian, P. Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Soc. Netw.1989, 11, 39–63. [CrossRef]

38. Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Esposito, E. Knowledge management in startups: Systematic literature reviewand future research agenda. Sustainability 2017, 9, 361. [CrossRef]

39. Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Chiaroni, D.; Del Vecchio, P.; Urbinati, A. Designing business models in circulareconomy: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Bus Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 1734–1749.[CrossRef]

40. Shashi, S.; Cerchione, R.; Singh, R.; Centobelli, P.; Shabani, A. Food cold chain management: From a structuredliterature review to a conceptual framework and research agenda. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2018, 29, 792–821.[CrossRef]

41. Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Esposito, E. Environmental sustainability in the service industry of transportationand logistics service providers: Systematic literature review and research directions. Transp. Res. Part DTransp. Environ. 2017, 53, 454–470. [CrossRef]

42. Mayring, P. Qualitative Inhaltanalyse—Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative Content Analysis]; Beltz: Weinheim,Germany, 2008.

43. Seuring, S.; Gold, S. Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management.Supply Chain Manag. 2012, 17, 544–555. [CrossRef]

44. Berelson, B. Content Analysis in Communication Research; The Free Press: Glencoe, The Scottish, UK, 1952.[CrossRef]

45. Yawar, S.A.; Seuring, S. Management of Social Issues in Supply Chains: A Literature Review ExploringSocial Issues, Actions and Performance Outcomes. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 141, 621–643. [CrossRef]

46. VOSviewer-Visualizing Scientific Landscapes. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/ (accessed on31 March 2020).

47. CiteSpace: Visualizing Patterns and Trends in Scientific Literature. Available online: http://cluster.cis.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/ (accessed on 31 March 2020).

48. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.Scientometrics 2009, 84, 523–538. [CrossRef]

49. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. In Advancesin Data Analysis; Decker, R., Lenz, H.-J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 299–306.[CrossRef]

50. Waaijer, C.J.F.; van Bochove, C.A.; van Eck, N.J. On the map: Nature and science editorials. Scientometrics2011, 86, 99–112. [CrossRef]

51. Chen, C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature.J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec. 2006, 57, 359–377. [CrossRef]

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.030


http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.03.004

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598541211246558

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211651

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(89)90017-8

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9030361

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2466

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2017-0007

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.032

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258609

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000271625228300135

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2719-9

https://www.vosviewer.com/

http://cluster.cis.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/

http://cluster.cis.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70981-7_34

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0205-9

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317


52. Chen, C. Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 5303–5310. [CrossRef]

53. Chen, C.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.; Hou, J. The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters:A multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec. 2010, 61, 1386–1409. [CrossRef]

54. Ejsmont, K.; Gladysz, B.; Corti, D.; Castaño, F.; Mohammed, W.M.; Martinez Lastra, J.L. Towards ‘LeanIndustry 4.0′–current trends and future perspectives. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2020, 7, 1781995. [CrossRef]

55. Birkel, H.S.; Veile, J.W.; Müller, J.M.; Hartmann, E.; Voigt, K.-I. Development of a risk framework for Industry4.0 in the context of sustainability for established manufacturers. Sustainability 2019, 11, 384. [CrossRef]

56. Varela, L.; Araújo, A.; Ávila, P.; Castro, H.; Putnik, G. Evaluation of the relation between lean manufacturing,Industry 4.0, and sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1439. [CrossRef]

57. Machado, C.G.; Winroth, M.P.; Ribeiro da Silva, E.H.D. Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0:An emerging research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 1462–1484. [CrossRef]

58. Elkington, J. Accounting for the triple bottom line. Meas. Bus. Excell. 1998, 2, 18–22. [CrossRef]59. Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Hultink, E.J. The circular economy–A new sustainability

paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768. [CrossRef]60. Boons, F.; Luedeke-Freund, F. Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards

a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 45, 9–19. [CrossRef]61. Markard, J.; Raven, R.; Truffer, B. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects.

Res. Policy 2012, 41, 955–967. [CrossRef]62. Smart Manufacturing Leadership Coalition. Implementing 21st Century Smart Manufacturing. Washington,

DC: Workshop Summary Report. 2011. Available online: https://www.controlglobal.com/assets/11WPpdf/110621_SMLC-smart-manufacturing.pdf (accessed on 30 March 2020).

63. Wübbeke, J.; Meissner, M.; Zenglein, M.J.; Ives, J.; Conrad, B. Made in China 2020. The Making of a High-TechSuperpower and Consequences for Industrial Countries; MERICS: Berlin, Germany, 2016; pp. 1–76.

64. De Treville, S.; Ketokivi, M.; Singhal, V. Competitive manufacturing in a high-cost environment: Introductionto the special issue. J. Oper. Manag. 2017, 49–51, 1–5. [CrossRef]

65. Kusiak, A. Smart manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 508–517. [CrossRef]66. Munirathinam, S. Chapter Six-Industry 4.0: Industrial Internet of Things (IIOT). Adv. Comput. 2020, 117,

129–164. [CrossRef]67. Strozzi, F.; Bono, F.; Gutierrez, E. Bibliometric and citation network analysis: Percolation and graph spectral

analysis in the framework of wireless sensor network technology. In EUR Scientific and Technical ResearchSeries: JRC92443; The European Commission: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2014.

68. Davis, J.; Edgar, T.; Porter, J.; Bernaden, J.; Sarli, M. Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence anddemand-dynamic performance. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2012, 47, 145–156. [CrossRef]

69. Davis, J.; Edgar, T.; Graybill, R.; Korambath, P.; Schott, B.; Swink, D.; Wang, J.; Wetzel, J. Smart Manufacturing.Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2015, 6, 141–160. [CrossRef]

70. De Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Foropon, C.; Filho, M.G. When titans meet–Can Industry 4.0revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors.Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 132, 18–25. [CrossRef]

71. Waibel, M.W.; Steenkamp, L.P.; Moloko, N.; Oosthuizen, G.A. Investigating the effects of smart productionsystems on sustainability elements. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 8, 731–737. [CrossRef]

72. De Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Filho, M.G.; Roubaud, D. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy:A proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations. Ann. Oper. Res. 2018, 270,273–286. [CrossRef]

73. Luthra, S.; Mangla, S.K. Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainabilityin emerging economies. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 117, 168–179. [CrossRef]

74. Prause, G. Sustainable business models and structures for industry 4.0. J. Secur. Sustain. Issues 2015, 5,159–169. [CrossRef]

75. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, S.; Yang, M.; Wang, Y.; Huisingh, D. How can smart technologies contribute tosustainable product lifecycle management? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 249, 119423. [CrossRef]

76. Lee, Y.T.; Kumaraguru, S.; Jain, S.; Robinson, S.; Helu, M.; Hatim, Q.Y.; Rachuri, S.; Dornfeld, D.; Saldana, C.J.;Kumara, S. A classification scheme for smart manufacturing systems’ performance metrics. Smart Sustain.Manuf. Syst. 2017, 1, 52–74. [CrossRef]

http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307513100

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1781995

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11020384

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11051439

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1652777

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb025539



http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013

https://www.controlglobal.com/assets/11WPpdf/110621_SMLC-smart-manufacturing.pdf

https://www.controlglobal.com/assets/11WPpdf/110621_SMLC-smart-manufacturing.pdf

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2017.02.001

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.adcom.2019.10.010

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.037

http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061114-123255

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.017

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.094

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8


http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.5.2(3)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119423

http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/SSMS20160012


77. Kibira, D.; Morris, K.C.; Kumaraguru, S. Methods and tools for performance assurance of smart manufacturingsystems. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 2016, 121, 282–313. [CrossRef]

78. Ordieres-Meré, J.; Remón, T.P.; Rubio, J. Digitalization: An opportunity for contributing to sustainabilityfrom knowledge creation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1460. [CrossRef]

79. Beier, G.; Niehoff, S.; Xue, B. More sustainability in industry through Industrial Internet of Things? Appl. Sci.2018, 8, 219. [CrossRef]

80. Luthra, S.; Kumar, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Mangla, S.K.; Garza-Reyes, J.A. Industry 4.0 as an enabler ofsustainability diffusion in supply chain: An analysis of influential strength of drivers in an emergingeconomy. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 1505–1521. [CrossRef]

81. Shivajee, V.; Singh, R.K.; Rastogi, S. Manufacturing conversion cost reduction using quality control tools anddigitization of real-time data. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117678. [CrossRef]

82. Nhamo, G.; Nhemachena, C.; Nhamo, S. Using ICT indicators to measure readiness of countries to implementIndustry 4.0 and the SDGs. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 2020, 22, 315–337. [CrossRef]

83. Ghobakhloo, M.; Fathi, M. Corporate survival in Industry 4.0 era: The enabling role of lean-digitizedmanufacturing. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2020, 31, 1–30. [CrossRef]

84. Garcia-Muiña, F.E.; González-Sánchez, R.; Ferrari, A.M.; Volpi, L.; Pini, M.; Siligardi, C.; Settembre-Blundo, D.Identifying the equilibrium point between sustainability goals and circular economy practices in an Industry4.0 manufacturing context using eco-design. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 241. [CrossRef]

85. Yang, S.; Raghavendra, M.R.A.; Kaminski, J.; Pepin, H. Opportunities for industry 4.0 to supportremanufacturing. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1177. [CrossRef]

86. Tsai, W.-H.; Lu, Y.-H. A framework of production planning and control with carbon tax under industry 4.0.Sustainability 2018, 10, 3221. [CrossRef]

87. Tsai, W.-H.; Lai, S.-Y. Green production planning and control model with ABC under industry 4.0 for thepaper industry. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2932. [CrossRef]

88. Tsai, W.-H. Green production planning and control for the textile industry by using mathematicalprogramming and industry 4.0 techniques. Energies 2018, 11, 2072. [CrossRef]

89. Müller, J.M. Contributions of Industry 4.0 to quality management-A SCOR perspective. IFAC-PapersOnLine2019, 52, 1236–1241. [CrossRef]

90. Johansson, N.; Roth, E.; Reim, W. Smart and sustainable emaintenance: Capabilities for digitalization ofmaintenance. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3553. [CrossRef]

91. Daú, G.; Scavarda, A.; Scavarda, L.F.; Portugal, V.J.T. The healthcare sustainable supply chain 4.0: The circulareconomy transition conceptual framework with the corporate social responsibility mirror. Sustainability 2019,11, 3259. [CrossRef]

92. Garcia-Muiña, F.E.; González-Sánchez, R.; Ferrari, A.M.; Settembre-Blundo, D. The paradigms of Industry4.0 and circular economy as enabling drivers for the competitiveness of businesses and territories: The caseof an Italian ceramic tiles manufacturing company. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 255. [CrossRef]

93. Yadav, G.; Luthra, S.; Jakhar, S.K.; Mangla, S.K.; Rai, D.P. A framework to overcome sustainable supplychain challenges through solution measures of industry 4.0 and circular economy: An automotive case.J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120112. [CrossRef]

94. Martín-Gómez, A.; Aguayo-González, F.; Luque, A. A holonic framework for managing the sustainablesupply chain in emerging economies with smart connected metabolism. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 141,219–232. [CrossRef]

95. Perussi, J.B.; Gressler, F.; Seleme, R. Supply chain 4.0: Autonomous vehicles and equipment to meet demand.Int. J. Sup. Chain. Mgt. 2019, 8, 33–41.

96. Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Dhone, N.C. Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainableorganisational performance in Indian manufacturing companies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 1319–1337.[CrossRef]

97. Martínez-Olvera, C.; Mora-Vargas, J. A comprehensive framework for the analysis of Industry 4.0 valuedomains. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2960. [CrossRef]

98. Barenji, R.V.; Akdag, Y.; Yet, B.; Oner, L. Cyber-physical-based PAT (CPbPAT) framework for Pharma 4.0.Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 567, 118445. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.121.013

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12041460

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app8020219

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1660828


http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10018-019-00259-1

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-11-2018-0417

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/socsci8080241


http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10093221

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10082932

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en11082072


http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11133553

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11123259

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/socsci7120255


http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.035

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1630772

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11102960

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.06.036

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226474


99. Sutduean, C.; Sutduean, J.; Arsert, K.J. Can strategic, operational, and environmental opportunities enhanceeconomic aspects of sustainability performance in Thailand’s pharmaceuticals sector: Role of industry 4.0implementation? Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2019, 10, 362–371. [CrossRef]

100. Knoke, D.; Yang, S. Social Network Analysis, 2nd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008.101. Khitous, F.; Strozzi, F.; Urbinati, A.; Alberti, F. A systematic literature network analysis of existing themes

and emerging research trends in circular economy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1633. [CrossRef]102. Müller, J.M.; Kiel, D.; Voigt, K.-I. What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The role of opportunities

and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 247. [CrossRef]103. Bressanelli, G.; Adrodegari, F.; Perona, M.; Saccani, N. Exploring how usage-focused business models enable

circular economy through digital technologies. Sustainability 2018, 10, 639. [CrossRef]104. Kiel, D.; Müller, J.M.; Arnold, C.; Voigt, K.-I. Sustainable industrial value creation: Benefits and challenges of

Industry 4.0. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2017, 21, 1740015. [CrossRef]105. Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.G.; Foo, S. Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using

co-word analysis. Inf. Process. Manag. 2001, 37, 817–842. [CrossRef]106. Callon, M.; Courtial, J.P.; Laville, F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions

between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics 1991, 22, 155–205.[CrossRef]

107. Bányai, T.; Tamás, P.; Illés, B.; Stankeviciute, Ž.; Bányai, Á. Optimization of municipal waste collectionrouting: Impact of industry 4.0 technologies on environmental awareness and sustainability. Int. J. Environ.Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 634. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

108. Roy, M.; Roy, A. Nexus of Internet of Things (IoT) and Big Data: Roadmap for Smart Management Systems(SMgS). IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 2019, 47, 53–65. [CrossRef]

109. Jena, M.C.; Mishra, S.K.; Moharana, H.S. Application of Industry 4.0 to enhance sustainable manufacturing.Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2020, 39, 13360. [CrossRef]

110. Bi, Z.; Liu, Y.; Krider, J.; Buckland, J.; Whiteman, A.; Beachy, D.; Smith, J. Real-time force monitoring of smartgrippers for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2018, 11, 19–28. [CrossRef]

111. Yue, X.; Cai, H.; Yan, H.; Zou, C.; Zhou, K. Cloud-assisted industrial cyber-physical systems: An insight.Microprocess. Microsyst. 2015, 39, 1262–1270. [CrossRef]

112. Miranda, J.; Pérez-Rodríguez, R.; Borja, V.; Wright, P.K.; Molina, A. Integrated product, process andmanufacturing system development reference model to develop cyber-physical production systems-thesensing, smart and sustainable microfactory case study. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2017, 50, 13065–13071. [CrossRef]

113. Horváthová, M.; Lacko, R.; Hajduová, Z. Using industry 4.0 concept–digital twin–to improve the efficiencyof leather cutting in automotive industry. Qual. Innov. Prosper. 2019, 23, 1–12. [CrossRef]

114. Meng, K.; Qian, X.; Lou, P.; Zhang, J. Smart recovery decision-making of used industrial equipment forsustainable manufacturing: Belt lifter case study. J. Intell. Manuf. 2020, 31, 183–197. [CrossRef]

115. Khakifirooz, M.; Fathi, M.; Wu, K. Development of Smart Semiconductor Manufacturing: OperationsResearch and Data Science Perspectives. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 108419–108430. [CrossRef]

116. Camarinha-Matos, L.M.; Fornasiero, R.; Ramezani, J.; Ferrada, F. Collaborative networks: A pillar of digitaltransformation. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5431. [CrossRef]

117. Fritzsche, K.; Niehoff, S.; Beier, G. Industry 4.0 and climate change-exploring the science-policy gap.Sustainability 2018, 10, 4511. [CrossRef]

118. Trivelli, L.; Apicella, A.; Chiarello, F.; Rana, R.; Fantoni, G.; Tarabella, A. From precision agriculture toIndustry 4.0: Unveiling technological connections in the agrifood sector. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 1730–1743.[CrossRef]

119. Müller, J.M.; Voigt, K.-I. Sustainable industrial value creation in SMEs: A comparison between Industry 4.0and Made in China 2025. Int. J. Pr. Eng. Man.–G.T. 2018, 5, 659–670. [CrossRef]

120. Park, K.T.; Kang, Y.T.; Yang, S.G.; Zhao, W.B.; Kang, Y.-S.; Im, S.J.; Kim, D.H.; Choi, S.Y.; Do Noh, S. Cyberphysical energy system for saving energy of the dyeing process with industrial internet of things andmanufacturing big data. Int. J. Pr. Eng. Man.–G.T. 2020, 7, 219–238. [CrossRef]

121. Ardanza, A.; Moreno, A.; Segura, Á.; de la Cruz, M.; Aguinaga, D. Sustainable and flexible industrial humanmachine interfaces to support adaptable applications in the Industry 4.0 paradigm. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57,4045–4059. [CrossRef]

http://dx.doi.org/10.5530/srp.2019.2.47

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12041633

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10010247

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10030639

http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617400151

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00051-0

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040634

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30795548

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2019.2915961

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ep.13360

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2018.02.004

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2015.08.013


http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/qip.v23i2.1211

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1439-2

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2933167


http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10124511

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2018-0747

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0056-z

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00084-7

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1572932


122. Munodawafa, R.T.; Johl, S.K. Big data analytics capabilities and eco-innovation: A study of energy companies.Sustainability 2019, 11, 4254. [CrossRef]

123. Sutthichaimethee, P.; Chatchorfa, A.; Suyaprom, S. A forecasting model for economic growth and CO2

emission based on industry 4.0 political policy under the government power: Adapting a second-orderautoregressive-SEM. J. Open Innovat. Technol. Market Complexity 2019, 5, 69. [CrossRef]

124. Beier, G.; Niehoff, S.; Ziems, T.; Xue, B. Sustainability aspects of a digitalized industry–A comparative studyfrom China and Germany. Int. J. Pr. Eng. Man.–G.T. 2017, 4, 227–234. [CrossRef]

125. Braccini, A.M.; Margherita, E.G. Exploring organizational sustainability of Industry 4.0 under the triplebottom line: The case of a manufacturing company. Sustainability 2018, 11, 36. [CrossRef]

126. Gu, F.; Guo, J.; Hall, P.; Gu, X. An integrated architecture for implementing extended producer responsibilityin the context of Industry 4.0. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 1458–1477. [CrossRef]

127. Rajput, S.; Singh, S.P. Industry 4.0−challenges to implement circular economy. Benchmarking 2019. [CrossRef]128. Chauhan, C.; Sharma, A.; Singh, A. A SAP-LAP linkages framework for integrating Industry 4.0 and circular

economy. Benchmarking 2019. [CrossRef]129. Jabbour, C.J.C.; de Camargo Fiorini, P.; Wong, C.W.Y.; Jugend, D.; de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L.; Roman Pais

Seles, B.M.; Paula Pinheiro, M.A.; Ribeiro da Silva, H.M. First-mover firms in the transition towards thesharing economy in metallic natural resource-intensive industries: Implications for the circular economyand emerging industry 4.0 technologies. Resour. Policy 2020, 66, 101596. [CrossRef]

130. Sutawijaya, A.H.; Nawangsari, L.C. What is the impact of Industry 4.0 to green supply chain? J. Environ.Treat. Tech. 2020, 8, 207–213.

131. Ramirez-Peña, M.; Sánchez Sotano, A.J.; Pérez-Fernandez, V.; Abad, F.J.; Batista, M. Achieving a sustainableshipbuilding supply chain under I4.0 perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118789. [CrossRef]

132. Ramirez-Peña, M.; Fraga, F.J.A.; Sánchez Sotano, A.J.; Batista, M. Shipbuilding 4.0 index approaching supplychain. Materials 2019, 12, 4129. [CrossRef]

133. Kleinberg, J. Burst and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2003, 7, 373–397. [CrossRef]134. Pollack, J.; Adler, D. Emergent trends and passing fads in project management research: A scientometric

analysis of changes in the field. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2015, 33, 236–248. [CrossRef]135. Strandhagen, J.O.; Vallandingham, L.R.; Fragapane, G.; Strandhagen, J.W.; Stangeland, A.B.H.; Sharma, N.

Logistics 4.0 and emerging sustainable business models. Adv. Manuf. 2017, 5, 359–369. [CrossRef]136. Kobza, N.; Schuster, A. Building a responsible Europe-the value of circular economy. IFAC-PapersOnLine

2016, 49, 111–116. [CrossRef]137. Peruzzini, M.; Gregori, F.; Luzi, A.; Mengarelli, M.; Germani, M. A social life cycle assessment methodology

for smart manufacturing: The case of study of a kitchen sink. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2017, 7, 24–32. [CrossRef]138. Weichhart, G.; Molina, A.; Chen, D.; Whitman, L.E.; Vernadat, F. Challenges and current developments for

sensing, smart and sustainable enterprise systems. Comput. Ind. 2016, 79, 34–46. [CrossRef]139. Scharl, S.; Praktiknjo, A. The role of a digital Industry 4.0 in a renewable energy system. Int. J. Energy Res.

2019, 43, 3891–3904. [CrossRef]140. Balogun, A.-L.; Marks, D.; Sharma, R.; Shekhar, H.; Balmes, C.; Maheng, D.; Arshad, A.; Salehi, P. Assessing the

potentials of digitalization as a tool for climate change adaptation and sustainable development in urbancentres. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 53, 101888. [CrossRef]

141. Herrmann, C.; Schmidt, C.; Kurle, D.; Blume, S.; Thiede, S. Sustainability in manufacturing and factories ofthe future. Int. J. Pr. Eng. Man.–G.T. 2014, 1, 283–292. [CrossRef]

142. Adamik, A.; Nowicki, M. Barriers of creating competitive advantage in the age of Industry 4.0-conclusionsfrom international experience. In Contemporary Challenges in Cooperation and Coopetition in the Age of Industry4.0; Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A., Staniec, I., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2020;pp. 3–43. [CrossRef]

143. Młody, M.; Weinert, A. Industry 4.0 in Poland: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions.In Contemporary Challenges in Cooperation and Coopetition in the Age of Industry 4.0; Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A.,Staniec, I., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 43–73. [CrossRef]

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11154254

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030069

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40684-017-0028-8

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11010036

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1489161

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0430

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2018-0310

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101596


http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244129

http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024940629314

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.011

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40436-017-0198-1


http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.001

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.002

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.4462

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101888

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40684-014-0034-z

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30549-9_1

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30549-9_2

http://creativecommons.org/

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

impact of industry 4.0 on sustainability—bibliometric

Documents