impact of air pollution on public health: transportability of risk estimates jonathan m. samet, md,...

Download Impact of Air Pollution on Public Health: Transportability of Risk Estimates Jonathan M. Samet, MD, MS NERAM V October 16, 2006 Vancouver, B.C. Department

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: emery-ward

Post on 13-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1

Slide 2 Impact of Air Pollution on Public Health: Transportability of Risk Estimates Jonathan M. Samet, MD, MS NERAM V October 16, 2006 Vancouver, B.C. Department of Epidemiology Slide 3 What is transportability? The idea that risks of air pollution observed in one or more populations can be extended to other populations. AKA: generalizability or external validity Slide 4 Why transport risk estimates? Local evidence not available as basis for policy formulation. Use external evidence as framework to strengthen interpretation of locally derived evidence. To estimate burden of disease globally Slide 5 What factors influence transportability? Characteristics of the air pollution mixture in study community(ies). Population characteristics that determine susceptibility to air pollution. Methodologic issues Characteristics of exposure and outcome data Data analysis approach Publication bias Slide 6 Local vs non-local risk estimates Local estimates Motivate policy Facilitate burden estimation Accountability assessment Non-local estimates Credibility Stability and precision Bound risks Slide 7 St. Georges data base Slide 8 Time-series estimates to 2006 Daily all-cause mortality and PM 10 (n=314 ) St. Georges data base, 10/06 Slide 9 Time-series estimates to 2006 Daily cardiovascular mortality and PM 10 (n=177 ) St. Georges data base, 10/06 Slide 10 Time-series estimates to 2006 Respiratory mortality and PM 10 (n=47 ) St. Georges data base, 10/06 Slide 11 All-cause mortality: % change in number of deaths associated with 10 g/m 3 increase in daily PM 2.5 Source: Anderson HR et al. WHO 2004 Slide 12 What is responsible for heterogeneity? Publication bias? Population characteristics? Methodologic approaches? Slide 13 What is publication bias? A tendency for the publication process to differentially lead to publication of papers reporting statistically significant findings. May influence data analysis and selection of findings for publication Can it be identified? Graphical approaches Analytic approaches Slide 14 Ozone for example: a meta-analysis 144 effect estimates from 39 time-series studies Strong statistically significant association identified between ozone and mortality for total deaths and cardiovascular disease Implied relationship between ozone and respiratory disease mortality Large heterogeneity in individual study estimates Some indication of publication bias Bell et al., 2005 Slide 15 % Increase in Daily Mortality for 10 ppb in Daily O 3 Provided a single lag Provided multiple lags Publication bias? Ozone effect estimates and lags: publication bias? Slide 16 Comparison of ozone meta- analysis and multi-city results Bell et al. 2005 Slide 17 Funnel plot for estimates for respiratory mortality and ozone Source: Anderson HR et al. WHO 2004 Publication Bias Zone Slide 18 Variation in ozone effect by cause Percent increase in daily total mortality for a 10 ppb increase in daily ozone (95% PI) Total: 0.87% (0.55, 1.18%) CVD: 1.11% (0.68, 1.53%) Respiratory:0.47% (-0.51, 1.47%) Source: Bell et al. Epidemiol 2005 Slide 19 Variation in ozone effect by location Percent increase in daily total mortality for a 10 ppb increase in daily ozone (95% CI) U.S.: 0.84% (0.48, 1.20%) 11 estimates from 9 studies Non-U.S.: 0.92% (0.47, 1.38%) 20 estimates from 14 studies Heterogeneity among estimates Source: Bell et al. Epidemiol 2005 Slide 20 Variation in ozone effect by age Percent increase in daily total mortality for a 10 ppb increase in daily ozone (95% CI) All ages: 0.83% (0.53, 1.12%) 65+ or 64+: 1.27% (0.65, 1.89%) Source: Bell et al. Epidemiol 2005 Slide 21 Ranking of PM 10 estimates for all-cause mortality by annual average levels of PM 10 * *left y-axis: mean PM 10 levels in g/m 3 ; right y-axis: RR in total mortality of a 10 g/m 3 increase of PM 10 Source: Anderson HR et al. WHO 2004 Slide 22 Are all meta-analyses the same? Slide 23 Some solutions Maintained data base and periodic meta- analysis Multi-city analyses Periodic global analyses Also needed: Unbiased publication processes Transparent analytic approaches Bayesian methods for handling local data Slide 24 National Morbidity Mortality Air Pollution Study 19872000 Slide 25 City-specific and regional estimates City, Regional and National Estimates Slide 26 Sensitivity of the national average estimates of the PM 10 - mortality association to adjustment for seasonality and model choice (1987-2000) Peng, Dominici, Louis JRSS (2006) Slide 27 Sensitivity of national average estimates to model selection methods National average estimates of the % increase in mortality for a 10 g/m 3 increase in PM 10 Previously reported results appear robust to choice of model selection method Slide 28 Reproducible Research (www.biostat.jhsph.edu/MCAPS) Benefits: Verifying published findings Conducting alternative analyses of the same data Eliminating uninformed criticisms which do not match data Expediting interchange of ideas among investigators Slide 29 Overview of APHENA Air Pollution and Health: a Combined European And North American Approach (APHENA) The APHENA Group Europe: Touloumi G, Samoli E, Pipikou M, Atkinson R, Le Tertre A, Anderson R, Katsouyanni K US: Dominici F, Peng R, Schwartz J, Zanobetti A, Samet J Canada: Ramsay T, Burnett R, Krewski D. Supported by the Health Effects Institute Slide 30 Develop a common approach for first-stage analyses of mortality and admissions time-series data and assess sensitivity of findings to critical elements of the model (using simulations and real data). Comparative evaluation of different methods to identify and combine dose-response curves; Comparison of alternative methods for addressing mortality displacement, and eventual application of one or more approaches to the various databases; Development of a data base on potential effect modifiers with exploration of differences in common, core items across the involved countries; Parallel and combined analyses of the air pollution and mortality data, and air pollution and hospitalization data, including exploration of geographic heterogeneity. Objectives:Objectives: Slide 31 % increase in daily number of deaths (75+ years old), associated with 10 g/m 3 increase in PM 10 (lags 0 and 1) in 21 European and 15 U.S. cities with daily PM 10 data Slide 32 HEIs PAPA-SAN Project Slide 33 Looking Ahead Need for tracking development of risk estimates through systematic data bases Empiric evaluation of impact of local research estimates is needed Methods development needed for use of local risk estimates in context of regional and global estimates Continuation of APHENA-like approaches? Slide 34