impact assessment agency of canada - canada.ca€¦ · soils technical data report appendix a: soil...

60
Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-1 Appendix A Soil Landscape Models

Upload: others

Post on 12-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models

2010 Page A-1

Appendix A Soil Landscape Models

Page 2: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape
Page 3: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models

2010 Page A-3

Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape models derived in five physiographic regions of the project effects assessment area (PEAA):

• Southern Alberta Uplands • Alberta Plateau • Rocky Mountains • Interior Plateau • Coast Mountains

Eastern Alberta Plains was not modelled because soil inspection intensity is about one inspection per 400 m. The data sources used include the Alliance Pipeline Environmental Impact Assessment (Alliance Pipeline Limited Partnership 1997) in addition to an intensive soil field program run in 2005 and 2006.

A.1 Southern Alberta Uplands The designation of soil type by terrain combination is based on a thorough review and summation of the Wapiti and Iosegun Soil Reports (Twardy and Corns 1980; Knapik and Lindsay 1983). In this physiographic region, the following general relationships have been identified:

• Moraine: In this region, based on provincial soil surveys, the Edson till is dominant and is described as moderately fine to fine-textured and moderately calcareous. Soils developed on Edson till are dominated by Orthic Gray Luvisols and Brunisolic Gray Luvisols, with major inclusions of Gleysols and Organics in low-lying areas.

• Glaciolacustrine: Moderately fine to very fine-textured glaciolacustrine. The Donnelly soil series on glaciolacustrine in the Wapiti report is an imperfectly drained, Gleyed Solonetzic Gray Luvisol. The Donnelly series is very common in the eastern half of the Wapiti sheet. Poorly drained soils are identified as Orthic Luvic Gleysols in the Wapiti report (Twardy and Corns 1980).

• Glaciofluvial: Glaciofluvial sediments range from coarse to moderately coarse in the Wapiti map sheet. In some cases, the glaciofluvial sediments overlie either till or glaciolacustrine deposits (i.e., veneers of glaciofluvial overlying finer-textured sediments). The glaciofluvial veneers are associated with the Lodge series, which consists of Brunisolic and Orthic Gray Luvisols. The deeper glaciofluvial sediments are associated with the Blackmud series, consisting of Brunisolic Gray Luvisols and Eutric Brunisols.

• Fluvial (active and areas of inactive): A variety of materials (coarse to medium-textured materials) associated with recent fluvial activity occur in the Wapiti sheet. These sediments are associated with active fluvial stream channels. In general, Cumulic Regosols and Orthic or Humic Gleysols occur on the recent or active floodplains.

• Recent Lacustrine: Recent lacustrine materials generally are medium to very-fine textured sediments associated with the margins of lakes. Soils are dominantly Orthic and Rego-Gleysols.

• Colluvium: Colluvial sediments consist of actively eroding sediments on steep slopes where Regosolic soils have formed. Colluvial sediments associated with fans and cones are more stable and therefore Brunisols, and in some cases Luvisols, have had sufficient time to develop. Colluvial sediments are commonly mapped as “Rough Broken” in the soil reports.

Page 4: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-4 2010

• Eolian: Veneers of wind-blown, coarse to moderately coarse sediments occur in the area. These sediments support the development of Brunisols on rapid and well-drained sites. Brunisolic Gray Luvisols are expected to occur on moderately well and imperfectly drained sites.

• Organic: Very poorly drained sites are associated with peat accumulation. Organic deposits are dominated by Mesisols with substantial amounts of Fibrisols. The depth to underlying mineral sediments is expected to vary, such that Typic and Terric subgroups will occur.

The information contained in the Wapiti and Iosegun Soil Reports (identifying soil-parent material associations) was used to develop a soil landscape model. The following matrix (see Table A-1) outlines the criteria applied in the soil landscape model applied to the PEAA in the Southern Alberta Uplands physiographic region.

Table A-1 Soil Model Matrix for the Southern Alberta Uplands

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Soil Classification by Drainage Regime1

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Till All -- O.GL1 GL. GL O.LG -- Glaciolacustrine All -- O.GL GL.GL O.LG -- Glaciofluvial All except v, vb

and bv E.EB O.EB GL.EB O.G. --

Glaciofluvial v, vb and bv E.EB E.EB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G. -- Fluvial All active except

FAp SC --

FAp CU.R GLCU.R R.G. -- All inactive O.EB O.LG R.HG

Lacustrine All -- -- O.GL GL.GL O.LG -- Colluvium k, s, ks, sk, v,

bv, vb, b O.R O.R -- -- --

Colluvium f, c -- -- E.EB GLE.EB R.G. -- Eolian v, vx, vb E.EB E.EB E.EB GLE.EB O.G. -- Organic v,vb,bv -- -- -- -- -- T. M Organic b,p,pj TY.M Anthropogenic -- DL N (water) -- ZWA

NOTES: 1 Parent material types, soil classification abbreviations and drainage regime classes defined in Soil Classification

Working Group (1998). 2 Surface expression symbols defined in Howes and Kenk (1997) and the Glossary.

Page 5: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models

2010 Page A-5

A.2 Alberta Plateau The Alberta Plateau, situated along the British Columbia–Alberta boundary, contains similar topography to the western portions of the Southern Alberta Uplands physiographic region. The soil–terrain relationships in this region are based on the modelling of the Boreal White and Black Spruce (BWBS) biogeoclimatic zone as this climatic zone occupies most of the physiographic region. The common soil-terrain relationships identified in this region include:

• Colluvium: Brunisols (including Eluviated Dystric Brunisol and Eluviated Eutric Brunisol) are common on non-calcareous sedimentary rock. Eluviated Eutric Brunisols are common on calcareous sedimentary rock. Reduced leaching tends to occur on warmer aspects (e.g., southern exposures) with the development of Orthic Dystric Brunisols, Orthic Eutric Brunisols or Orthic Regosols commonly occurring.

• Fluvial (active): For most soil associations occurring in active fluvial materials, the modal classification is a Cumulic Regosol, although Orthic Regosols and associated gleyed subgroups are also common.

• Fluvial (inactive): Soil development on well or moderately well-drained fluvial deposits has resulted in the formation of Eluviated Dystric Brunisols and Brunisolic Gray Luvisols. Imperfectly drained fluvial deposits tend to develop into Gleyed Brunisolic Gray Luvisols. Poorly drained areas develop into Orthic Gleysols or Orthic Humic Gleysols.

• Glaciofluvial: In most mapped soil associations in this region, rapidly drained variants tend to be Orthic Dystric Brunisols or Orthic Eutric Brunisols. Common well-drained variants include Brunisolic Gray Luvisols, Eluviated Dystric Brunisols and Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzols, whereas moderately well-drained deposits tend to develop into Brunisolic Gray Luvisols. Imperfectly drained soils are generally Gleyed Brunisolic Gray Luvisols. Orthic Gleysols and Orthic Humic Gleysols make up most of the poorly drained glaciofluvial sediments.

• Lacustrine and Glaciolacustrine: Brunisolic Gray Luvisols are the most commonly found soil in moderately well-drained sites; Orthic Gray Luvisols or Dark Gray Luvisols may occasionally be present. Imperfectly drained soil may have Brunisolic Gray Luvisols or Orthic Gray Luvisols. Poorly drained locations tend to develop Orthic Luvic Gleysols, Orthic Gleysols or Orthic Humic Gleysols.

• Till (Morainal): Modal till soils are typically Brunisolic Gray Luvisols. In general, Orthic Gray Luvisolic and Eluviated Eutric Brunisolic soils overlie calcareous sandstone and shale whereas Eluviated Dystric Brunisols are commonly noted on non-calcareous sandstone and shale. Poorly drained soils are mainly Orthic Gleysols or Orthic Humic Gleysols.

• Organic: Organic deposits are classified as either Mesisols or Fibrisols, depending on the level of decomposition and depth of organic accumulation. Additional Organic soils were defined using a wetland classification system based on vegetation and terrain type. This classification also accounted for wet mineral soils, mineral soils with peat accumulation and Cumulic Regosols formed on floodplains (see Table A-11).

For the criteria applied in the soil landscape model applied to the PEAA in the Alberta Plateau physiographic region, see Table A-2.

Page 6: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-6 2010

Table A-2 Soil Model Matrix for the Boreal White and Black Spruce Zone – Alberta Plateau

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Geology

Active Process2

Soil Classification by Drainage Regime1

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly (v)

Colluvium (C,C1) x, xv N/A N/A O.R 1 -- -- -- -- -- all other pH>5.5 N/A E.EB O.EB GL.EB O.G --

pH<5.5 or conglomerate

N/A E.DYB O.DYB GL.DYB O.G --

Fluvial (F) any N/A A O.R CU.R GLCU.R R.G -- any N/A not A E.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

Glaciofluvial (FG) f, k, ka, kj, r, rm, rt, ru

N/A N/A O.DYB GL.DYB -- --

all other N/A N/A E.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G -- Lacustrine (L) any N/A Any -- BR.GL GLBR.GL O.LG -- Glaciolacustrine (LG)

any N/A Any BR.GL O.GL O.LG --

Till (Morainal) (M) d, h, hj, hu, jh, uh pH>5.5 N/A -- O.EB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G -- pH<5.5 N/A -- O.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

k, bk, kb, vx pH>5.5 N/A E.EB O.EB GL.EB -- -- pH<5.5 N/A E.DYB O.DYB GL.DYB -- --

all other pH>5.5 N/A E.EB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G pH<5.5 N/A E.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

Page 7: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-7

Table A-2 Soil Model Matrix for the Boreal White and Black Spruce Zone – Alberta Plateau (cont’d)

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Geology

Active Process2

Soil Classification by Drainage Regime1

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly (v)

Organic (O) v, vb, bv N/A N/A -- -- -- -- -- T.F b, p N/A N/A -- -- -- -- -- TY.F

Anthropogenic N/A N/A N/A DL Water N/A N/A N/A ZWA Bedrock N/A N/A N/A R

NOTES: 1 Parent material types, soil classification abbreviations, and drainage regime classes defined in Soil Classification Working Group (1998). 2 Surface expression and active processes symbols defined in Howes and Kenk (1997) and the Glossary. N/A – not applicable

Page 8: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-8 2010

A.3 Rocky Mountains A soil landscape model for this physiographic region was developed by subdividing the region into two climatic and elevation subregions. This subdivision followed the British Columbia biogeoclimatic ecological classification (BEC) of Sub-boreal Spruce (SBS) and Engelmann Spruce Subalpine Fir (ESSF) zones, which occur at different elevations and have been used to identify different soil-forming characteristics. The PEAA was divided by sub-zone and two separate model criteria were applied. The common soil–terrain relationships are outlined below.

• Colluvium: Soils developing over limestone or calcareous sedimentary bedrock are typically Eluviated Eutric Brunisols (Sheba Mountain, Suprenant and Wendt Mountain associations) with local inclusions of Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzols (Hedrick Association). The Misinchinka Association (Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzol) includes soil developed on fine-grained metamorphic parent materials. Fans, lower slopes and avalanche tracks tend to be mapped as Orthic Regosols, Sombric Ferro-Humic Podzols and gleyed subgroups.

• Weathered Bedrock: Soils developed on this parent material are likely at early stages, shown by weak horizon development. They are modelled as Eluviated Eutric Brunisols over basic bedrock and as Eluviated Dystric Brunisols over acidic bedrock. Minor inclusions of Orthic Regosols were also noted.

• Fluvial (active): The most common imperfectly drained soil occurring on fluvial material is a Gleyed Cumulic Regosol (Monkman Creek Association). Rego-Gleysols are most common on poorly drained sites. Moderately to well-drained soils are typically Cumulic Regosols, but Orthic Regosols also occur.

• Fluvial (inactive): Brunisolic Gray Luvisols and Eluviated Dystric Brunisols occur on finer-textured materials. Coarse or wet-climate variants tend to be mapped as Podzolic Gray Luvisols. Podzolic Gray Luvisols may occasionally develop on fluvial veneers over moraine.

• Glaciofluvial: Well to rapidly drained soils may develop Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzols, Eluviated Eutric Brunisols, or Eluviated Dystric Brunisols. Well to moderately well-drained soils include Brunisolic Gray Luvisols, Eluviated Dystric Brunisols, Eluviated Eutric Brunisols, with limited Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzols.

• Till (Morainal): A large variety of soils develop on till deposits. These include Brunisolic Gray Luvisols, Podzolic Gray Luvisols, Luvisolic Humo-Ferric Podzols and Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzols. Dystric and Eutric Brunisols are also found on this parent material. Orthic Regosols are often found in areas of shallow surficial material. Thin deposits of basal till over bedrock found on steep slopes (eroded or otherwise unstable) would have arrested development and would tend toward Brunisols rather than Luvisols. Poorly drained sites are generally Orthic Gleysols or Orthic Humic Gleysols.

Page 9: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-9

• Organic: Most modal organic soil associations in the literature are described as Mesisols. However, ground sites along the PEAA were generally classified as Fibrisols (Typic and Terric). At high elevation, some Terric Fibrisols are formed, which develop on sphagnum material. Some Typic Fibrisol has formed on sedge peat dominated organic parent materials. Additional Organic soils were defined using a wetland classification system based on vegetation and terrain type. This classification also accounted for wet mineral soils, mineral soils with peat accumulation and Cumulic Regosols formed on floodplains (see Table A-11). The use of this additional soil model allowed the diversity of wetland soil types to be further defined as the associated vegetation type was accounted for, which often is an indirect qualifier of water table depths and fluctuations, flooding and other soil-forming factors.

For the criteria applied in the two soil landscape models applied to the PEAA in the Rocky Mountains physiographic region, see Tables A-3 and A-4.

Page 10: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-10 2010

Table A-3 Soil Model Matrix for the Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir Zone – Rocky Mountains

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Geology

Active

Process2

Soil Classification by Drainage Regime1

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Colluvium (C,C1) x, xv N/A N/A O.R 1 -- -- -- -- --

c, k, ka pH>5.5 N/A O.EB -- -- --

pH<5.5 N/A O.DYB -- -- --

all other conglomerate N/A E.DYB GL.DYB O.G --

pH>5.5 N/A O.R E.EB GL.MB O.G --

pH<5.5 N/A O.HFP GL.HFP O.G --

Decaying Bedrock (D)

Any pH<5.5 N/A E.DYB -- -- -- --

pH>5.5 N/A E.EB -- -- -- --

Fluvial (F) Any N/A A O.R CU.R GLCU.R R.G --

Any N/A I (not A) O.HFP BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

Glaciofluvial (FG) k, ka, kj, r, rm, rt, ru

N/A N/A O.DYB GL.DYB -- --

all other N/A N/A O.HFP BR.GL GLBR.GL -- --

Lacustrine (L), Glaciolacustrine (LG)

Any N/A N/A -- BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

Till (Morainal) (M) bv, vb, v, vx pH>5.5 N/A E.EB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G -- -

pH<5.5 N/A E.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.HG -- -

all other any N/A O.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

Page 11: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-11

Table A-3 Soil Model Matrix for the Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir Zone – Rocky Mountains (cont’d)

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Geology

Active

Process2

Soil Classification by Drainage Regime1

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Organic (O) v, vb, bv N/A N/A -- -- -- -- -- T.F

b, p N/A N/A -- -- -- -- -- TY.F

Anthropogenic N/A N/A N/A DL

Water N/A N/A N/A ZWA

Bedrock N/A N/A N/A R

NOTES: 1 Parent material types, soil classification abbreviations and drainage regime classes defined in Soil Classification Working Group (1998). 2 Surface expression and active processes symbols defined in Howes and Kenk (1997) and the Glossary. N/A – not applicable

Page 12: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-12 2010

Table A-4 Soil Model Matrix for the Sub-Boreal Spruce Zone – Rocky Mountains

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Geology

Active

Process2

Soil Classification by Drainage Regime1

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Colluvium (C,C1) x, xv any N/A O.R 1 -- -- -- -- --

all other pH>5.5 N/A O.EB GL.EB O.G --

pH<5.5 N/A E.DYB GL.DYB O.G --

Fluvial (F) Any N/A A O.R GL.R R.G --

Any N/A I (not A) O.DYB O.GL GL.GL R.G --

Glaciofluvial (FG) f, k, ka, kj, r, rm, rt, ru

N/A N/A O.DYB GL.DYB -- --

all other N/A N/A E.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

Lacustrine (L) Any N/A A -- O.R GL.R R.G --

Lacustrine (L), Glacio-lacustrine (LG)

any N/A I (not A) O.DYB O.GL GL.GL O.HG --

Till (Morainal) (M) d, h, hj, hu, jh, uh pH>5.5 N/A -- O.EB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

pH<5.5 N/A -- O.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

k, bk, kb, v, vx pH>5.5 N/A E.EB O.EB GL.EB O.G --

pH<5.5 N/A E.DYB O.DYB GL.DYB O.G --

b, bj, bm, br, bv, vb

N/A N/A E.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.HG --

all other N/A N/A O.DYB O.GL GL.GL O.HG --

Page 13: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-13

Table A-4 Soil Model Matrix for the Sub-Boreal Spruce Zone – Rocky Mountains (cont’d)

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Geology

Active

Process2

Soil Classification by Drainage Regime1

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Organic (O) v, vb, bv N/A N/A -- -- -- -- -- T.F

b, p N/A N/A -- -- -- -- -- TY.F

Anthropogenic N/A N/A N/A DL

Water N/A N/A N/A ZWA

Bedrock N/A N/A N/A R

NOTES: 1 Parent material types, soil classification abbreviations and drainage regime classes defined in Soil Classification Working Group (1998). 2 Surface expression and active processes symbols defined in Howes and Kenk (1997) and the Glossary. N/A – not applicable

Page 14: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-14 2010

A.4 Interior Plateau The Interior Plateau physiographic region encompasses two biogeoclimatic zones. As in the Rocky Mountains physiographic region, the Sub-Boreal Spruce (SBS) and Engelmann Spruce Subalpine Fir (ESSF) zone are present. The soil development processes are similar; however, in many instances climatic conditions favour more advanced soil development. Common soil–terrain relationships include:

• Colluvium: Colluvial materials tend to occur on steep and unstable slopes. Where slopes have been stable for a long enough period, Brunisols dominate. The most common previously mapped Brunisolic soil associations occurring along the RoW include Orthic Dystric Brunisols, and Orthic Eutric Brunisols. The Eutric Brunisols overly basic bedrock and occur on the route along a stretch between Fort St. James and Great Beaver Lake (Dawson 1989). On less stable slopes, those with rapid mass movement or slopes over 70%, Orthic Regosols are likely to occur. Colluvial soils over acidic or unspecified bedrock are typically Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzols or Eluviated Dystric Brunisols. On herb-dominated warm aspects (south to southwest facing slopes greater than 20%), Orthic Sombric Brunisols or Orthic Melanic Brunisols are occasionally found.

• Fluvial (active): Because of frequent flooding in these areas, soil development is maintained at an early stage. The common soil series are Gleyed Regosols. Associated soil subgroups possess drainage conditions that differ from modal. Ground sites at lower elevations in the Interior Plateau are often found to have Orthic rather than Cumulic Regosols.

• Fluvial (inactive): Soil reports show that recent deposits of finer fluvial material result in Orthic Gray Luvisols. Gravelly fluvial materials, such as valley train deposits, tend to be dominated by Orthic Dystric Brunisols. Fluvial fans generally are Orthic Dystric Brunisols or Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzols.

• Glaciofluvial: West of Fort St. James, glaciofluvial soil is common on sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial valley train and pitted outwash deposits. Additional soils formed on coarse-textured glaciofluvial valley train deposits are Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzols and Eluviated Dystric Brunisols, which develop in rapidly drained conditions, and Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzol and Gleyed Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzol, which develop under well to imperfectly drained conditions. Eluviated Dystric Brunisols are common west of Fort St. James. Between Bear Lake and Great Beaver Lake are finer deposits also forming Eluviated Dystric Brunisols. Eluviated Dystric Brunisols on sandy eskers are found just south of the pipeline route and a short distance west of Bear Lake.

• Lacustrine (active): Orthic Regosols formed on existing beaches are mapped by Cotic (1974).

• Lacustrine and Glaciolacustrine (inactive): Inactive lacustrine and glaciolacustrine deposits differ from the active lacustrine as greater soil development has occurred in these soils due to time. In addition beyond the edges of glacio-lakes deposits are finer-textured soils resulting in the development of Luvisols.

Page 15: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-15

• In this model, lacustrine deposits are assumed to have similar characteristics to soil developed on glaciolacustrine deposits. Rapidly drained deposits at each edge of the large glacial lake near Fort St. James consisting of sandy pebbly form Eluviated Dystric Brunisols. Well drained deposits, and moderately well-drained deposits, are dominated by Orthic Gray Luvisols. Gleyed versions were found east of the Fort St. James airport during detailed sampling in the Agricultural Land Reserve. Lacustrine deposits along the Salmon River are also likely Orthic Gray Luvisols.

• Till (ablation): Ablation till soils for this area include Orthic Dystric Brunisols and Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzols. Ground sites uncovered less Podzolic development than had been mapped in the region (see British Columbia Soil Report 22 and 23). Soils mapped on fine-textured deposits generally were found to be Dystric Brunisols or Brunisolic Gray Luvisols in the field survey. Thin deposits of till overlying bedrock found on steep slopes (eroded or otherwise unstable) would have arrested development and tend towards Brunisols rather than Luvisols. Examples include Orthic Dystric Brunisols and Orthic Eutric Brunisols. Eroded but otherwise stable slopes can also form Orthic Gray Luvisols.

• Till (basal): Basal till tends to be very compacted below 0.3 m from the surface. Cigar-shaped hills, whether controlled by sediment (drumlins) or by bedrock (drumlinoid), are diagnostic landforms, as is the absence of pitting. Orthic Gray Luvisols form in drier climates, usually with gentle relief, whereas Brunisolic Gray Luvisols develop under wetter conditions, often with high relief or with a high degree of bedrock control. Luvisolic Humo-Ferric Podzol occur at higher elevations, usually with a high incidence of bedrock control. Ground survey sites from Dominion association landscapes found soil to be less developed Brunisolic Gray Luvisols, but these sites were at the low end of the elevation range.

• Organic: Mesic Fibrisols and Typic Fibrisols can be classified based on the presence or absence of trees, respectively. Most of the organic soils inspected were either Terric Fibrisols or Typic Fibrisol, but were further refined by the wetland model. The wetland classification model was based on vegetation and terrain type. This classification also accounted for wet mineral soils, mineral soils with peat accumulation and Cumulic Regosols formed on floodplains (see Table A-11).

For the criteria applied in the two soil landscape models applied to the PEAA in the Interior Plateau physiographic region, see Tables A-5 and A-6.

Page 16: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-16 2010

Table A-5 Soil Model Matrix for the Sub-Boreal Spruce Zone – Interior Plateau

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Geology

Active

Process2

Soil Classification by Drainage Regime1

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Colluvium (C,C1) x, xv, vx any N/A O.R -- -- -- -- --

all other pH>5.5 N/A O.EB GL.EB O.G --

pH<5.5 N/A E.DYB GL.DYB O.G --

Fluvial (F) any N/A A O.R GL.R R.G --

any N/A I (not A) O.DYB O.GL GL.GL R.G --

Glaciofluvial (FG) f, k, ka, kj, r, rm, rt, ru

N/A N/A O.DYB GL.DYB -- --

all other N/A N/A E.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

Lacustrine (L) any N/A A -- O.R GL.R R.G --

Lacustrine (L), Glacio-lacustrine (LG)

any N/A I (not A) O.DYB O.GL GL.GL O.HG --

Till (Morainal) (M) d, h, hj, hu, jh, uh pH>5.5 N/A -- O.EB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

pH<5.5 N/A -- O.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

k, bk, kb, v, vx pH>5.5 N/A E.EB O.EB GL.EB O.G --

pH<5.5 N/A E.DYB O.DYB GL.DYB O.G --

b, bj, bm, br, bv, vb N/A N/A E.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.HG --

all other N/A N/A O.DYB O.GL GL.GL O.HG --

Page 17: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-17

Table A-5 Soil Model Matrix for the Sub-Boreal Spruce Zone – Interior Plateau

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Geology

Active

Process2

Soil Classification by Drainage Regime1

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Organic (O) v, vb, bv N/A N/A -- -- -- -- -- T.F

b, p N/A N/A -- -- -- -- -- TY.F

Anthropogenic N/A N/A N/A DL

Water N/A N/A N/A ZWA

Bedrock N/A N/A N/A R

NOTES: 1 Parent material types, soil classification abbreviations and drainage regime classes defined in Soil Classification Working Group (1998). 2 Surface expression and active processes symbols defined in Howes and Kenk (1997) and the Glossary. N/A – not applicable

Page 18: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-18 2010

Table A-6 Soil Model Matrix for the Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir Zone – Interior Plateau

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Geology

Active

Process2

Soil Classification by Drainage Regime1

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Colluvium (C,C1) x, xv N/A N/A O.R 1 -- -- -- -- --

c, k, ka pH>5.5 N/A O.EB -- -- --

pH<5.5 N/A O.DYB -- -- --

all other conglomerate N/A E.DYB GL.DYB O.G --

pH>5.5 N/A E.EB GL.MB O.G --

pH<5.5 N/A O.HFP GL.HFP O.G --

Weathered Bedrock (D)

any pH<5.5 N/A E.DYB -- -- -- --

pH>5.5 N/A E.EB -- -- -- --

Fluvial (F) any N/A A O.R CU.R GLCU.R R.G --

any N/A I (not A) O.HFP BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

Glaciofluvial (FG) k, ka, kj, r, rm, rt, ru

N/A N/A O.DYB GL.DYB -- --

all other N/A N/A O.HFP BR.GL GLBR.GL -- --

Lacustrine (L), Glacio-Lacustrine (LG)

any N/A N/A -- BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

Till (Morainal) (M) bv, vb, v, vx pH>5.5 N/A -- E.EB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

pH<5.5 N/A -- E.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.HG --

all other any N/A O.DYB BR.GL GLBR.GL O.G --

Page 19: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-19

Table A-6 Soil Model Matrix for the Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir Zone – Interior Plateau (cont’d)

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Geology

Active

Process2

Soil Classification by Drainage Regime1

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Organic (O) v, vb, bv N/A N/A -- -- -- -- -- T.F

b, p N/A N/A -- -- -- -- -- TY.F

Anthropogenic (A)

-- N/A N/A DL

Water (N) -- N/A N/A ZWA

Bedrock (R) -- N/A N/A R

NOTES: 1 Parent material types, soil classification abbreviations, and drainage regime classes defined in Soil Classification Working Group (1998). 2 Surface expression and active processes symbols defined in Howes and Kenk (1997) and the Glossary. N/A – not applicable

Page 20: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-20 2010

A.5 Coast Mountains The Coast Mountains physiographic region is subdivided into four biogeoclimatic (BGC) zones to accurately model the soil conditions. This region is occupied by high-relief mountainous topography, as well as coastal valley topography. These two diverse regions support substantially different climatic conditions and, therefore, soil forming processes. The Coast Mountains region includes the Coastal Western Hemlock (CWH), Mountain Hemlock (MH), Engelmann Spruce Subalpine Fir (ESSF), and Coastal Mountain Heather (CMH) BGC zones. In this physiographic region, climatic conditions vary geographically and are generally wetter and milder on the coast, grading to drier and cooler conditions across the divide toward the interior of the province (Ecological Stratification Working Group 1996). The parent materials of this region, in addition to the influences of bedrock geology and climate, have a major influence on the soil types found in the Coast Mountains. Soil types associated with each deposit can generally be categorized according to material type and thickness and soil moisture regime in each biogeoclimatic unit. The common soil–terrain relationships include:

• Colluvial: Thin to very thin colluvial parent materials generally contain Regosolic soils. Humo-Ferric Podzols and weakly developed Dystric Brunisols are commonly found on thin to thick colluvium throughout the region. Ferro-Humic Podzols constitute minor inclusions, generally developing under krummholz and dwarf evergreen scrub vegetation. Poorly to very poorly drained Gleysolic soils or gleyed and peaty variants have formed on thin to thick colluvium in lower slope positions. Folisols, composed entirely of upland (folic) materials, are commonly associated with mid to upper slopes of steep, rocky terrain that is well to imperfectly drained.

• Fluvial (active): Poorly to very poorly drained Gleysolic soils and peaty variants have formed on thin to thick fluvial materials on lower slope to depressional topographic positions with imperfect to poor drainage. Regosolics are rapidly to imperfectly drained and have formed on moderately thick to thick active fluvial deposits.

• Fluvial (inactive): Gleysolic, as well as gleyed and peaty variants of mineral soils, have developed on lower slope positions with imperfect to poor drainage. Gravelly fluvial materials tend to be dominated by Orthic Dystric Brunisols.

• Glaciofluvial: Humo-Ferric Podzols, Ferro-Humic Podzols and weakly developed Dystric Brunisols have developed on medium to thick glaciofluvial deposits. In general, glaciofluvial sediments are well drained, although localized gleyed variants of soil associations may occur.

• Glaciomarine: Humo-Ferric Podzols and weakly developed Dystric Brunisols have developed on medium to thick fine-textured glaciomarine sediments. Ferro-Humic Podzols and, to a lesser extent Dystric Brunisols, are associated with the deposition of coarse-textured (deltaic) glaciomarine sediments. Poorly to very poorly drained Gleysolic soils and peaty variants have formed on lower-slope position glaciomarine parent materials.

• Marine: Humo-Ferric Podzols and weakly developed Dystric Brunisols have developed on medium to thick marine sediments. Poorly to very poorly drained Gleysolic soils and peaty variants have formed on marine sediments in lower-slope topographic positions with imperfect to poor drainage. Imperfectly to poorly drained gleyed variants of Regosols are more commonly associated with active marine sediments.

Page 21: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-21

• Till (Morainal): Humo-Ferric Podzols and weakly developed Dystric Brunisols have developed on variable depth of till as bedrock is often near the surface in areas. Ferro-Humic Podzols constitute minor inclusions, generally developing under higher-elevation krummholz and dwarf evergreen scrub vegetation. Gleyed or gleyed and peaty variants of mineral soils have developed on lower slope and depressional topographic positions with imperfect to poor drainage. Eutric Brunisols occur infrequently, and often as gleyed subgroups on lower slopes in areas with nutrient-rich seepage or in localized riparian areas. Folisols, composed entirely of upland (folic) materials, are commonly associated with mid- to upper slopes of steep, rocky terrain that is well to imperfectly drained.

• Organic: Typic and Terric subgroups of the Fibrisol and Mesisol Great Groups are the most commonly occurring Organic soil and are found along poorly to very poorly drained margins of open wetlands, in lake or pond basins and other (localized) depressional areas in the landscape. Humisols or Humic subgroups of Mesisols also occur, but are limited in extent and typical of deep, poorly to very poorly drained sedge wetlands. Terric Mesisols, which are the most dominant Organic soils at higher elevations, are found in poorly to very poorly drained (localized) wetlands, along the margins of pond basins and depressions in the bedrock surface. Folisols were commonly found in the Coastal Western Hemlock zone and were often located over a lithic contact or fragmental rock material. These soils often supported mature forests. Additional Organic soils were defined using a wetland classification system based on vegetation and terrain type due to the diversity in the landscape from the varied topography. This classification also accounted for wet mineral soils, mineral soils with peat accumulation and Cumulic Regosols formed on floodplains (see Table A-11). The wetland vegetation varies in this area and is often bedrock controlled. This additional modelling allows the diversity of soil types to be identified by taking into account vegetation types specific to this biogeoclimatic zone which can often indicate water table depths, seepage areas and other soil forming processes.

• Weathered Bedrock: Regosolic soils are dominant in areas of exposed bedrock or very thin to thin weathered bedrock. Where soil development does occur, it is generally at an early stage, as shown by weak horizon development. These soils are modelled as Eluviated Eutric Brunisols over basic bedrock and as Eluviated Dystric Brunisols over acidic bedrock.

For the criteria applied in the two soil landscape models applied to the PEAA in the Coast Mountains physiographic region, see Tables A-7 to A-10.

Page 22: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-22 2010

Table A-7 Soil Model Matrix for the Coastal Western Hemlock Zone – Coast Mountains

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Subgroup Classification by Drainage Regime1 Very

Rapidly (x)

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfect (i)

Poor (p)

Very Poor (v)

Anthropogenic (A) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any combination)

DL

Colluvium (C) p,j,a,,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any combination)

O.HFP O.HFP O.FHP O.G --

k,s, ks, sk, ck O.R. O.R -- -- -- b,w,bv O.FHP O.HFP O.FHP O.G -- v,vb, vx O.HFP O.HFP GLE.DYB O.G -- x, xv O.R O.R -- -- -- v,vb,vx, x,xv and forest structural stage 4, 5 or 6

HE.FO

Weathered Bedrock (D) v,vb,vx -- O.R O.R GLE.DYB -- x, xv -- O.R O.R -- -- --

v,vb,vx, x,xv and forest structural stage 4, 5 or 6

HE.FO

Glaciofluvial (FG) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d, t (any combination)

O.HFP O.HFP GLE.DYB O.G --

b,w,bv -- -- O.HFP GL.HFP O.G -- v,vb,vx -- -- O.DYB GL.DYB O.G --

Fluvial (F) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any combination)

E.DYB O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G --

b,w,bv -- -- O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G -- v,vb,vx -- -- O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G --

Page 23: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-23

Table A-7 Soil Model Matrix for the Coastal Western Hemlock Zone – Coast Mountains (cont’d)

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Subgroup Classification by Drainage Regime1 Very

Rapidly (x)

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfect (i)

Poor (p)

Very Poor (v)

Active Fluvial (FA) p, m, t -- -- CU.R GLCU.R R.G -- Till (Morainal) (M) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any

combination) O.HFP O.HFP GL.HFP O.G --

b,w,bv -- -- O.HFP GL.HFP O.G -- v,vb,vx E.DYB O.HFP GLE.DYB O.G -- x, xv O.DYB O.HFP -- -- --

Organic (O) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any combination)

-- -- -- -- -- TY.M3 TY.M

b,w,bv -- -- -- -- -- T.M T.M v,vb,vx -- -- -- -- -- T.M T.M

Rock (R) Lithic R Water (N) -- ZWA Marine (W) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any

combination) -- -- PZ.GL GLPZ.GL O.G --

b,w,bv -- -- PZ.GL GLPZ.GL -- -- v,vb,vx -- -- PZ.GL -- -- --

Marine (WA) J -- -- -- O.R GL.R -- --

Page 24: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-24 2010

Table A-7 Soil Model Matrix for the Coastal Western Hemlock Zone – Coast Mountains (cont’d)

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Subgroup Classification by Drainage Regime1 Very

Rapidly (x)

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfect (i)

Poor (p)

Very Poor (v)

Glaciomarine (WG) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d, t (any combination)

-- E.DYB O.HFP GL.HFP O.G --

b,w,bv -- -- O.HFP GL.HFP O.G -- v,vb,vx O.DYB O.HFP GL.HFP O.G -- x, xv -- -- O.DYB -- -- --

Undifferentiated (U) p -- E.DYB -- -- -- -- --

NOTES: 1 Parent material types, soil classification abbreviations and drainage regime classes defined in Soil Classification Working Group (1998). 2 Surface expression symbols defined in Howes and Kenk (1997) and the Glossary. 3 Poorly drained organic soils are uncommon in the PEAA and are generally thin organic soil over mineral materials.

Page 25: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-25

Table A-8 Soil Model Matrix for the Mountain Hemlock Zone – Coast Mountains

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Subgroup Classification by Drainage Regime1 Very

Rapidly (x)

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Colluvium (C) p,j,a,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any

combination) O.DYB a O.HFP GL.HFP O.G --

k,s, O.R O.R -- -- -- b,w,bv O.DYB O.HFP GL.HFP O.G -- v,vb,vx O.DYB O.HFP GL.HFP O.G -- x, xv O.R E.DYB -- -- --

Weathered Bedrock (D) v,vb,vx -- -- O.DYB GLE.DYB -- x, xv -- -- O.DYB -- -- --

Fluvial (F) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d, t (any combination)

E.DYB O.EB GLE.EB O.G --

b,w,bv -- -- O.EB GLE.EB O.G -- v,vb,vx -- -- O.EB GLE.EB O.G --

Till (Morainal) (M) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any combination)

E.DYB O.HFP GL.HFP O.G --

b,w,bv -- -- O.HFP GL.HFP O.G -- v,vb,vx E.DYB O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G -- x, xv E.DYB O.DYB -- -- --

Page 26: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-26 2010

Table A-8 Soil Model Matrix for the Mountain Hemlock Zone – Coast Mountains (cont’d)

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Subgroup Classification by Drainage Regime1 Very

Rapidly (x)

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Organic (O) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any

combination) -- -- -- -- -- TY.M3 TY.M

b,w,bv -- -- -- -- -- T.M T.M v,vb,vx -- -- -- -- T.M T.M

Rock (R) Lithic R

NOTES: 1 Parent material types, soil classification abbreviations and drainage regime classes defined in Soil Classification Working Group (1998). 2 Surface expression symbols defined in Howes and Kenk (1997) and the Glossary. 3 Poorly drained organic soils are uncommon in the PEAA and are generally thin organic soil over mineral materials.

Page 27: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-27

Table A-9 Soil Model Matrix for Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir Zone – Coast Mountains

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Subgroup Classification by Drainage Regime1 Very

Rapidly (x)

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Anthropogenic (A) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any

combination) DL

Colluvium (C) p,j,a,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any combination)

O.DYB1 O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G --

k,s, ak O.R O.R -- O.G b,w,bv O.DYB O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G -- v,vb,vx O.DYB O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G -- x, xv O.R O.DYB -- -- --

Weathered Bedrock (D)

v,vb,vx -- -- O.DYB GLE.DYB x, xv -- -- O.DYB -- -- --

Fluvial (F) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d, t (any combination)

E.DYB O.DYB GLE.EB O.G --

b,w,bv -- -- O.DYB GLE.EB O.G -- v,vb,vx -- -- O.DYB GLE.EB O.G --

Fluvial (FA) p, t -- -- CU.R GLCU.R R.G Glaciofluvial (FG) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d, t (any

combination) -- O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G --

b,w,bv -- -- O.DYB -- -- -- v,vb,vx -- -- O.DYB -- -- --

Lacustrine (L) P -- -- -- O.EB GL.EB O.G -- Glaciolacustrine (LG) Any O.EB

Page 28: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-28 2010

Table A-9 Soil Model Matrix for Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir Zone – Coast Mountains (cont’d)

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Subgroup Classification by Drainage Regime1 Very

Rapidly (x)

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(v) Till (Morainal) (M) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any

combination) O.DYB O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G --

b,w,bv -- -- O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G -- v,vb,vx O.DYB O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G -- x, xv O.DYB O.DYB -- -- --

Organic (O) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any combination)

-- -- -- -- -- TY.M3 TY.M

b,w,bv -- -- -- -- -- T.M T.M v,vb,v -- -- -- -- T.M T.M

Rock (R) Lithic R Water (N) -- ZWA

NOTES: 1 Parent material types, soil classification abbreviations, and drainage regime classes defined in Soil Classification Working Group (1998). 2 Surface expression symbols defined in Howes and Kenk (1997) and the Glossary. 3 Poorly drained organic soils are uncommon in the PEAA and are generally thin organic soil over mineral materials.

Page 29: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-29

Table A-10 Soil Model Matrix for Coastal Mountain Heather Zone – Coast Mountains

Material Type1

Surface Expression2

Subgroup Classification by Drainage Regime1 Very

Rapidly (x)

Rapidly (r)

Well (w)

Moderately Well (m)

Imperfectly (i)

Poorly (p)

Very Poorly

(p) Colluvium (C) p,j,a,u,h,m,r,c,f,d

(any combination) O.DYB1 O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G --

k,s O.R O.R -- -- -- b,w,bv O.DYB O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G -- v,vb,vx O.DYB O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G -- x, xv O.R O.DYB -- -- --

Weathered Bedrock (D) v,vb,vx -- -- O.DYB GLE.DYB O.G -- x, xv -- -- O.DYB -- -- --

Till (Morainal) (M) p,j,a,k,s,u,h,m,r,c,f,d (any combination)

O.DYB O.DYB GLE.DYB O.HG --

b,w,bv -- -- O.DYB GLE.DYB O.HG -- v,vb,vx O.DYB O.DYB GLE.DYB O.HG -- x, xv O.R O.DYB -- -- --

Rock I Lithic R

NOTES: 1 Parent material types, soil classification abbreviations and drainage regime classes defined in Soil Classification Working Group (1998). 2 Surface expression symbols defined in Howes and Kenk (1997) and the Glossary.

Page 30: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-30 2010

Table A-11 Soil Model Matrix for British Columbia Wetlands Biogeoclimatic

Zone Subzone Variant Site Series Map Code Wetland

Code Wetland

Type Terrain material

Terrain expression Drainage

Soil Subgroup

ESSF wc 3 00 SU NC1 floodplain F any CU.M

SBS mc 2 00 WS Ws04 swamp i,p, vp CU.M

SBS mk 1 00 WH Ws04 swamp i,p, vp CU.M

BWBS mw 1 00 AH Fl01 floodplain F any CU.R

BWBS mw 1 00 DB Fl05 floodplain F any CU.R

BWBS wk 1 00 DB Fl05 floodplain F any CU.R

ESSF mc 00 MH Fl01 floodplain F any CU.R

ESSF mk 00 DB Fl05 floodplain F any CU.R

ESSF mk 00 MH Fl01 floodplain F any CU.R

SBS dk 00 DB Fl05 floodplain F any CU.R

SBS dw 3 00 DB Fl05 floodplain F any CU.R

SBS mc 2 00 DB Fl01 floodplain F any CU.R

SBS dw 3 00 CS Fm02 floodplain F any GLCU.R

SBS vk 00 DR Fl05 floodplain F any GLCU.R

SBS wk 1 00 WD Fl04 floodplain F any GLCU.R

SBS wk 2 00 WB Fl05 floodplain F any GLCU.R

BWBS wk 1 00 KC Sc01 shrub-carr i,p, vp GL.DYB

CWH vm 1 11 CW Fl04 low floodplain

F any GL.HR

ESSF mk 00 CS Fm02 floodplain F any GLCU.R

ESSF wk 2 00 WC Sc03 shrub-carr Any Any if seepage (L) present

GL.DYB

Page 31: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-31

Table A-11 Soil Model Matrix for British Columbia Wetlands (cont’d) Biogeoclimatic

Zone Subzone Variant Site Series Map Code Wetland

Code Wetland

Type Terrain material

Terrain expression Drainage

Soil Subgroup

SBS vk 00 SP Wb12 bog O any HY.F

SBS dk 10 SS Wb08 bog O any LM.M

ESSF mc 10 FH Ws08 swamp i,p, vp O.G

ESSF mc 09 HG Ws08 swamp i,p, vp O.G

ESSF mk 06 FH Ws08 swamp i,p, vp O.G

ESSF mv 2 06 FH NC swamp i,p, vp O.G

ESSF wc 3 03 FG NC swamp i,p, vp O.G

BWBS wk 1 06 SH Ws07 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

ESSF wk 2 06 FH Ws07 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

SBS dk 07 SH Ws07 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

SBS dw 3 09 SH Ws07 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

SBS mc 2 10 SH Ws07 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

SBS mk 1 00 AS Ws01 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

SBS mk 1 09 SH Ws07 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

SBS vk 00 AS Ws01 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

SBS vk 06 SH Ws07 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

SBS wk 1 00 AS Ws01 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

SBS wk 1 09 SH Ws07 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

SBS wk 2 06 SH Ws07 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

CWH vm 1 14 RC Ws54 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

CWH ws 1 11 RC Ws54 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

CWH ws 2 11 RC Ws54 swamp i,p, vp O.HG

Page 32: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-32 2010

Table A-11 Soil Model Matrix for British Columbia Wetlands (cont’d) Biogeoclimatic

Zone Subzone Variant Site Series Map Code Wetland

Code Wetland

Type Terrain material

Terrain expression Drainage

Soil Subgroup

CWH ws 1 09 CW Fl04 low bench floodplain

F any R.G

BWBS mw 1 00 DS Ws04 swamp i,p, vp R.G

BWBS mw 1 07 SH swamp i,p, vp R.G

BWBS mw 1 00 WF Fl03 floodplain F any R.G

SBS dk 00 WF Ws02 swamp i,p, vp R.G

SBS dk 00 WS Ws04 swamp i,p, vp R.G

SBS mc 2 00 CS Fm02 floodplain F any R.G

SBS wk 1 00 WS Ws06 swamp R.G

CWH vm 1 10 CD Fl51 med floodplain

F any R.G

CWH ws 1 08 CD Fl51 mid bench floodplain

F any R.G

CWH ws 2 08 CD Fl51 mid bench floodplain

F any R.G

CWH ws 2 09 CW Fl04 low bench floodplain

F any R.G

CWH ws 2 07 SS Fm50 high bench floodplain

F any R.G

BWBS mw 1 00 WM Wm01 marsh i,p, vp R.HG

BWBS wk 1 00 BS Ws03 swamp i,p, vp R.HG

BWBS wk 1 00 MB Ws05 swamp i,p, vp R.HG

BWBS wk 1 00 WM Wm01 marsh i,p, vp R.HG

ESSF mk 00 BK Wm01 marsh i,p, vp R.HG

Page 33: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-33

Table A-11 Soil Model Matrix for British Columbia Wetlands (cont’d) Biogeoclimatic

Zone Subzone Variant Site Series Map Code Wetland

Code Wetland

Type Terrain material

Terrain expression Drainage

Soil Subgroup

ESSF mv 1 05 FH NC swamp i,p, vp R.HG

SBS dk 00 TB Ws03 swamp i,p, vp R.HG

SBS dw 3 00 BK Wm01 marsh i,p, vp R.HG

SBS dw 3 00 TB Ws03 swamp i,p, vp R.HG

SBS mc 2 00 BB Ws03 swamp i,p, vp R.HG

SBS mc 2 00 BK Wm01 marsh i,p, vp R.HG

SBS mk 1 00 MA Wm01 marsh i,p, vp R.HG

SBS mk 1 00 WB Ws03 swamp i,p, vp R.HG

SBS wk 1 00 MA Wm01 marsh i,p, vp R.HG

SBS wk 1 00 WB Ws03 swamp i,p, vp R.HG

SBS wk 2 00 SM Wm01 marsh i,p, vp R.HG

CWH vm 1 09 SS Fm50 high bench floodplain

F any R.HG

CWH ws 1 07 SS Fm50 high bench floodplain

F any R.HG

BWBS mw 1 11 BH Wb09 bog O v, vb,bv T.F

BWBS mw 1 11 BH Wb09 bog O b, p TY.F

BWBS wk 1 07 BH Wb09 bog O v, vb,bv T.F

BWBS wk 1 07 BH Wb09 bog O b, p TY.F

SBS mk 1 00 BS Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv TFI. M

SBS mk 1 00 BS Wf02 fen O b, p FI. M

SBS vk 00 BB Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv TFI. M

SBS vk 00 BB Wf02 fen O b, p FI. M

Page 34: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-34 2010

Table A-11 Soil Model Matrix for British Columbia Wetlands (cont’d) Biogeoclimatic

Zone Subzone Variant Site Series Map Code Wetland

Code Wetland

Type Terrain material

Terrain expression Drainage

Soil Subgroup

CWH ws 1 10 LS Wb51 bog O v, vb,bv TFI. M

CWH ws 1 10 LS Wb51 bog O b, p FI. M

ESSF wk 2 00 OT NC bog O v, vb,bv T.M

ESSF wk 2 00 OT NC bog O b, p TY. M

SBS mc 2 00 LS Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS mc 2 00 LS Wf02 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS vk 00 WB NC fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS vk 00 WB NC fen O b, p TY. M

SBS vk 00 WF Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS vk 00 WF Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

CWH ws 1 00 SF Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

CWH ws 1 00 SF Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

CWH ws 1 00 SH Wf52 fen/marsh O v, vb,bv T.H

CWH ws 1 00 SH Wf52 fen/marsh O b, p T.M

CWH ws 2 00 SF Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

CWH ws 2 00 SF Wf01 fen O b, p T.M

CWH vm 1 13 LS Wb51 bog O v, vb,bv TFI.M

CWH vm 1 13 LS Wb51 bog O b, p FI.M

BWBS mw 1 00 OS Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

BWBS mw 1 00 OS Wf02 fen O b, p TY. M

BWBS wk 1 00 FH Wf09 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

BWBS wk 1 00 FH Wf09 fen O b, p TY. M

Page 35: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-35

Table A-11 Soil Model Matrix for British Columbia Wetlands (cont’d) Biogeoclimatic

Zone Subzone Variant Site Series Map Code Wetland

Code Wetland

Type Terrain material

Terrain expression Drainage

Soil Subgroup

ESSF mc 00 WP Wf03 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

ESSF mc 00 WP Wf03 fen O b, p TY. M

ESSF wk 2 00 SG NC fen O v, vb,bv T.M

ESSF wk 2 00 SG NC fen O b, p TY. M

ESSF wk 2 00 WS Wf03 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

ESSF wk 2 00 WS Wf03 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS dk 00 FS Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS dk 00 FS Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS mc 2 00 FS Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS mc 2 00 FS Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS wk 2 00 OS Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS wk 2 00 OS Wf02 fen O b, p TY. M

BWBS wk 1 00 BB Wb11 bog O v, vb,bv TME.F

BWBS wk 1 00 BB Wb11 bog O b, p ME.F

BWBS wk 1 00 BT Wb03 bog O v, vb,bv T.F

BWBS wk 1 00 BT Wb03 bog O b, p TY.F

SBS vk 08 BS Wb02 bog O v, vb,bv T.F

SBS vk 08 BS Wb02 bog O b, p TY.F

BWBS mw 1 00 SE Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

BWBS mw 1 00 SE Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

BWBS mw 1 10 TS Wb06 bog O v, vb,bv T.M

BWBS mw 1 10 TS Wb06 bog O b, p TY. M

Page 36: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-36 2010

Table A-11 Soil Model Matrix for British Columbia Wetlands (cont’d) Biogeoclimatic

Zone Subzone Variant Site Series Map Code Wetland

Code Wetland

Type Terrain material

Terrain expression Drainage

Soil Subgroup

BWBS wk 1 00 OS Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

BWBS wk 1 00 OS Wf02 fen O b, p TY. M

BWBS wk 1 00 SE Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

BWBS wk 1 00 SE Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

BWBS wk 1 09 TS Wb06 bog O v, vb,bv T.M

BWBS wk 1 09 TS Wb06 bog O b, p TY. M

ESSF mc 00 SE Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

ESSF mc 00 SE Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

ESSF mc 00 WS Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

ESSF mc 00 WS Wf02 fen O b, p TY. M

ESSF mv 1 00 WS Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

ESSF mv 1 00 WS Wf02 fen O b, p TY. M

ESSF mv 2 00 TS Wb06 bog O v, vb,bv T.M

ESSF mv 2 00 TS Wb06 bog O b, p TY. M

ESSF mv 2 00 WS Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

ESSF mv 2 00 WS Wf02 fen O b, p TY. M

ESSF wk 2 00 BB Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

ESSF wk 2 00 BB Wf02 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS dw 3 00 BP Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS dw 3 00 BP Wf02 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS dw 3 10 BS Wb08 bog O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS dw 3 10 BS Wb08 bog O b, p TY. M

Page 37: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-37

Table A-11 Soil Model Matrix for British Columbia Wetlands (cont’d) Biogeoclimatic

Zone Subzone Variant Site Series Map Code Wetland

Code Wetland

Type Terrain material

Terrain expression Drainage

Soil Subgroup

SBS dw 3 00 FS Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS dw 3 00 FS Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS dw 3 00 SF Wf06 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS dw 3 00 SF Wf06 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS mk 1 00 WS Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS mk 1 00 WS Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS wk 1 00 BS Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS wk 1 00 BS Wf02 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS wk 1 00 WF Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS wk 1 00 WF Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS wk 2 00 BB Wb05 bog O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS wk 2 00 BB Wb05 bog O b, p TY. M

SBS wk 2 00 FE Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS wk 2 00 FE Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

SBS wk 2 00 TF Wb06 bog O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS wk 2 00 TF Wb06 bog O b, p TY. M

CWH vm 1 00 FS Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

CWH vm 1 00 FS Wf01 fen O b, p TY. M

CWH vm 1 00 HF Wf52 fen O v, vb,bv T.M

CWH vm 1 00 HF Wf52 fen O b, p TY. M

BWBS wk 1 08 BW NC bog O v, vb,bv T.F

BWBS wk 1 08 BW NC bog O b, p ME.F

Page 38: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

Page A-38 2010

Table A-11 Soil Model Matrix for British Columbia Wetlands (cont’d) Biogeoclimatic

Zone Subzone Variant Site Series Map Code Wetland

Code Wetland

Type Terrain material

Terrain expression Drainage

Soil Subgroup

ESSF mc 00 BH Wb09 bog O v, vb,bv T.F

ESSF mc 00 BH Wb09 bog O b, p ME.F

ESSF mk 00 BH Wb09 bog O v, vb,bv T.F

ESSF mk 00 BH Wb09 bog O b, p ME.F

ESSF mv 2 00 OT Wb09 bog O v, vb,bv T.F

ESSF mv 2 00 OT Wb09 bog O b, p ME.F

BWBS mw 1 08 BT Wb03 bog O v, vb,bv T.F

BWBS mw 1 08 BT Wb03 bog O b, p ME.F

ESSF mc 00 SB Wf08 fen O v, vb,bv T.F

ESSF mc 00 SB Wf08 fen O b, p TY.F

ESSF mk 00 SE Wf01 fen O v, vb,bv TFI.M

ESSF mk 00 SE Wf01 fen O b, p FI.M

ESSF mc 00 NS Wf13 fen O v, vb,bv TFI.M

ESSF mc 00 NS Wf13 fen O b, p FI.M

ESSF mk 00 NS Wf13 fen O v, vb,bv TFI.M

ESSF mk 00 NS Wf13 fen O b, p FI.M

ESSF wc 3 00 SS NC fen O v, vb,bv T.M

ESSF wc 3 00 SS NC fen O b, p TY.M

SBS mc 2 12 SS Wb05 bog O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS mc 2 12 SS Wb05 bog O b, p TY.M

SBS mk 1 10 BB Wb05 bog O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS mk 1 10 BB Wb05 bog O b, p TY.M

Page 39: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Section 4: References

2010 Page A-39

Table A-11 Soil Model Matrix for British Columbia Wetlands (cont’d) Biogeoclimatic

Zone Subzone Variant Site Series Map Code Wetland

Code Wetland

Type Terrain material

Terrain expression Drainage

Soil Subgroup

SBS wk 1 11 BB Wb05 bog O v, vb,bv T.M

SBS wk 1 11 BB Wb05 bog O b, p TY.M

ESSF mk 00 TS Wf11 fen O v, vb,bv T.F

ESSF mk 00 TS Wf11 fen O b, p ME.F

OW NC shallow open water

ZWA

PD NC pond ZWA

LA NC lake ZWA

ESSF mk 00 WS Wf02 fen O v, vb,bv T.M ESSF mk 00 WS Wf02 fen O b, p TY.M SBS dk 09 BS Wb01 bog O v, vb,bv T.F SBS dk 09 BS Wb01 bog O b, p TY.F SBS dk 08 CD NC floodplain F any CU.R SBS wk 2 00 AH Fl01 floodplain F any CU.R CWH vm 1 00 BK NC fen O v, vb,bv TFI.M CWH vm 1 00 BK NC fen O b, p FI.M CWH vm 1 12 YG NC bog i,p GL.HFP CWH vm 1 12 YG NC bog vp HI.FO

NOTES: 1 NC – No Code Definitions for abbreviations for Biogeoclimatic (BGC) zone, subzone, site series and map code are defined in the Vegetation TDR.

Page 40: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models

Page A-40 2010

A.6 References Howes, D.E. and E. Kenk. 1997. Terrain Classification System for British Columbia. Version 2. A system

for the classification of surficial materials, landforms and geological processes of British Columbia.

Knapik, L.J. and J.D. Lindsay. 1983. Reconnaissance Soil Survey of the Iosegun Lake Area, Alberta. Bulletin 43. Alberta Research Council, Edmonton, AB.

Soil Classification Working Group. 1998. The Canadian System of Soil Classification. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Publication 1646. 3rd Edition (revised).

Twardy, A.G. and I.G.W. Corns. 1980. Soil Survey and Interpretation of the Wapiti Map Area, Alberta. Report No. 39. Alberta Research Council, Edmonton, AB.

Page 41: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

2010 Page B-1

Appendix B Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

Page 42: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape
Page 43: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

2010 Page B-3

Appendix B presents the agricultural land capability classes, water erosion risk classes, wind erosion risk classes, and compaction and puddling risk classes associated with each soil type identified in the PEAA. Water erosion risks, wind erosion risks, and compaction and puddling risks are presented separately for agricultural and non-agricultural lands.

This appendix also presents a summary of the agricultural land capability class, water erosion risk, wind erosion risk, and compaction and puddling risk for each soil map unit identified in the PEAA in agricultural lands in Alberta.

B.1 Land Capability Classification for Agriculture This section presents the land capability classes and subclasses associated with dominant soil types for different slope classes on agricultural lands in Alberta and British Columbia. Soil capability for agriculture was determined according to the Canada Land Inventory (CLI) classification system in Alberta and according to a modified CLI system in British Columbia. Definitions of the CLI ratings, composed of CLI classes and subclasses, are in Section 2.7 of this report.

In British Columbia, Gleysolic and Luvisolic soil were identified in agricultural lands. Luvisols were assigned an agricultural land capability class of 5D, whereas Gleysols are rated Class 6W.

For the CLI land capability ratings for each combination of soil series and slope class identified in agricultural lands in Alberta in the PEAA, see Table B-1.

Table B-1 Land Capability Ratings for Agricultural Lands in Alberta

Soil Series Symbol1

Canada Land Inventory Rating Slope Class 1-32 Slope Class 4 Slope Class 5 Slope Class 6-8

AGS 1 2T 3T 4T AGSer 2E 3ET 4ET 5ET AGSgl 2W AGSsa 3N 3NT 4NT 5NT AGSsc 2N 3NT 4NT 5NT AGSst 2P 3PT 4PT 5PT ARM 4D 4DT 4DT 5DT CMHM 3M 3MT 4MT 5MT CMHO 3W BLB 3D 3DT 4DT 5DT BMY 4W BMYpt 5W BOB 3W BVH 1 3T 4T 5T CCB 1 3T 4T

Page 44: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

Page B-4 2010

Table B-1 Land Capability Ratings for Agricultural Lands in Alberta (cont’d)

Soil Series Symbol1

Canada Land Inventory Rating Slope Class 1-32 Slope Class 4 Slope Class 5 Slope Class 6-8

CMO 2D 3DT 4DT 5DT CMOgl 3W CMOglxp 3W CMOsa 4N 4NT 4NT 5NT CMOst 3P 3PT 4PT 5PT COA 3D 3DT 4DT 5DT COAer 4E 4ET 4ET 5ET COAst 4P 4PT 4PT 5PT COD 6W CODpt 6W CSNaa 5M 5M 5MT 5MT DEV O DEVxc O DEVyc O DMY 6W DMYcrsa 6WN DNT 4D 4DT 4DT 5DT DUG 3D 3DT 4DT 5DT DUGgl 4W DUGglxt 4W DUGxp 4X 4XT 4XT 5XT ELL 1 3T 4T ELP 4M 4MT 4MT 5MT FTH 5MP 5MP 5TM 5TM GOY 3D 3DT 4DT 5DT GRZ 2M 3MT 4MT 5MT GRZcagl 3W GRZgl 3W GSP O HAT 4 4 5T 5T HBM 1 3T 4T HBMsa 3N 3NT 4NT HBMsc 2N 3NT 4NT HDR 3D 3DT 4DT 5DT

Page 45: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

2010 Page B-5

Table B-1 Land Capability Ratings for Agricultural Lands in Alberta (cont’d)

Soil Series Symbol1

Canada Land Inventory Rating Slope Class 1-32 Slope Class 4 Slope Class 5 Slope Class 6-8

HGT 6W HGTpt 6W HGTxt 6W HRL* 6WN HRLxt 6WN HUB 4D 4DT 4DT 5DT HUBgl 5W HUBst 5P 5PT 5PT 5PT HUBxp 5X 5XT 5XT 5XT JFF 2W KVG 4D 4DT 4DT 5DT KWO 4D 4DT 4DT 5DT LNN 2C 3T 4T 5T LOM 2C 3T 4T 5T MAK 6W MCO 2C 3T 4T 5T MCOgl 2C 3T 4T 5T MDR 4M 4MT 4MT 5MT MLA 3D 3DT 4DT 5DT MLAgl 4W MLAglxt 4W MLAxt 3D 3DT 4DT 5DT MLS 3D 3DT 4DT 5DT MMO 1 3T 4T MMOxt 1 3T 4T MNT O MVL 2X 3XT 4XT MVLgl 2W MYW 4D 4DT 4DT 5DT MYWgl 4W NKU 3D 4DT 4DT 5DT NTN O NVR 2W NVRsa 4WS

Page 46: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

Page B-6 2010

Table B-1 Land Capability Ratings for Agricultural Lands in Alberta (cont’d)

Soil Series Symbol1

Canada Land Inventory Rating Slope Class 1-32 Slope Class 4 Slope Class 5 Slope Class 6-8

NVRsc 3WS NVRscxt 3WS NVRxt 2W ONW 6W ONWpt 6W PHS 2M 3MT 4MT 5MT PHSgl 2W PHSglxc 2W POK 1 3T 4T POKgl 2W POKsa 3N 3NT 4NT POKsc 2N 3NT 4NT POKst 2P 3PT 4PT POKxc 1 3T 4T POKxp 2X 3XT 4XT PRM 5M 5M 5MT 5MT RDW 3M 3MT 4MT 5MT RDWcaxt 3M 3MT 4MT 5MT RDWer 4ME 4MT 4MT 5MT RDWgr 4M 4MT 4MT 5MT RDWsa 4MN 5NT 5NT 5NT RDWxt 3M 3MT 4MT 5MT RLV 2C 3T 4T 5T RLVgl 3W RMY 2C 3T 4T 5T RMYca 2C 3T 4T 5T RMYgl 3W RMYxc 2C 3T 4T 5T RMYxt 2C 3T 4T 5T RVN 6W RVNpt 6W RVNxt 6W TBY 3D 3DT 4DT 5DT TBYgl 4W

Page 47: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

2010 Page B-7

Table B-1 Land Capability Ratings for Agricultural Lands in Alberta (cont’d)

Soil Series Symbol1

Canada Land Inventory Rating Slope Class 1-32 Slope Class 4 Slope Class 5 Slope Class 6-8

TGL 4M 4MT 4MT 5MT TGLxczb 4M 4MT 4MT 5MT TGLzb 4M 4MT 4MT 5MT UCS 2C 3T 4T 5T UCSst 3P 3PT 4PT 5PT WHF 4D 4DT 4DT 5DT WKN 3D 3DT 4DT 5DT WKNgl 4w - - - WSR 3D 3DT 4DT 5DT WTB 2C 3T 4T 5T WTBgl 3W - - -

NOTES: 1 Soil series symbols are defined in Table 2-5. 2 Slope classes are associated with the following slope gradients: 1–3: 0%-5%; 4: 5%–10%; 5: 10%–15%; 6–8: 15%–

70% - indicates that soil series are unlikely to be found on these slope classes

B.2 Water Erosion Risk Classes This section presents the water erosion risk classes associated with dominant soil series in the PEAA. Methodology for assessment of water erosion risk is outlined in Section 2.8.2.

For the water erosion risk classes for each combination of soil series and slope class identified in agricultural lands in Alberta in the PEAA, see Table B-2.

Table B-2 Water Erosion Risk Classes for Agricultural Lands Soil

Series Symbol1

Water Erosion Risk Class

Slope Class 12

Slope Class 2

Slope Class 3

Slope Class 4

Slope Class 5

Slope Class 6

Slope Class 7

Slope Class 8

Slope Class 9

AGS L L L L M H H H H AGSgl L L L L M H H H H ARM L NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR BITxt L L L L L L L L L CMO L L L M H H H H H BLB L M NR NR NR NR NR NR NR CMOgl L L L M H H H H H COA L L L M H H H H H

Page 48: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

Page B-8 2010

Table B-2 Water Erosion Risk Classes for Agricultural Lands (cont’d) Soil

Series Symbol1

Water Erosion Risk Class

Slope Class 12

Slope Class 2

Slope Class 3

Slope Class 4

Slope Class 5

Slope Class 6

Slope Class 7

Slope Class 8

Slope Class 9

COAgl L L L M H H H H H DEV L L L L L L L L L DEVyc L L L L L L L L L DKN NR L L M NR NR NR NR NR DMY L L L H H H H H H DNT L L L M H H H H H DUG L L L M H H H H H DUGgl L L L M H H H H H DUGglxt L L L M H H H H H ELP L L L M H H H H H FKE L L L L L L L L L GOY M M M M H H H H H GRZ L L L M H H H H H GRZaa L L L M H H H H H GRZaagl L L L M H H H H H GRZgl L L L M H H H H H GSP L L L L L L L L L HAT M M NR NR NR NR NR NR NR HGT L L L L L H H H H HGTpt L L L L L H H H H HGTxt L L L L L H H H H HRL L L L H H H H H H HRLxt L L L H H H H H H HUB L L L M H H H H H HUBaa L L L M H H H H H HUBgl L L L M H H H H H JIFF NR L L NR NR NR NR NR NR JVE NR L L M H H NR NR NR KNZaa L L L L L L L L L KVG L L L M H H H H H MAK H H H H H H H H H MCO L L L L M H H H H MCOgl L L L L M H H H H MJU NR L L M NR NR NR NR NR

Page 49: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

2010 Page B-9

Table B-2 Water Erosion Risk Classes for Agricultural Lands (cont’d) Soil

Series Symbol1

Water Erosion Risk Class

Slope Class 12

Slope Class 2

Slope Class 3

Slope Class 4

Slope Class 5

Slope Class 6

Slope Class 7

Slope Class 8

Slope Class 9

MLA L L L M H H H H H MLAgl L L L M H H H H H MLAglxt L L L M H H H H H MLAxt L L L M H H H H H MLT NR L L L NR NR NR NR NR MLY NRN NR NR M NR NR NR NR NR MMO L L L L M H H H H MNTaa L L L L NR NR NR NR NR MYW M M M M H H H H H MYWgl M M M M H H H H H MYWxt M M M M H H H H H NKU NR L L M NR NR NR NR NR NVR L L L L M H H H H NVRxt L L L L M H H H H ONW L L L M M H H H H ONWpt L L L M M H H H H POK NR L L M M H H NR NR PRM L L L L M H NR NR NR PRS L L L L M H H H H PRSgl L L L L M H H H H PTO M M M M H H H H H PTOaa M M M M H H H H H PTOaagl M M M M H H H H H RB H H H H H H H H H RLV L L L M H H H H H RLVgl L L L M H H H H H RVN L L L L L H H H H RVNpt L L L L L H H H H RVNxt L L L L L H H H H TBY L L L M H H H H H TBYgl L L L M H H H H H TGL NR NR NR M M NR NR NR NR WAB L L L M NR NR NR NR NR WKN L L L L M H H H H

Page 50: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

Page B-10 2010

Table B-2 Water Erosion Risk Classes for Agricultural Lands (cont’d) Soil

Series Symbol1

Water Erosion Risk Class

Slope Class 12

Slope Class 2

Slope Class 3

Slope Class 4

Slope Class 5

Slope Class 6

Slope Class 7

Slope Class 8

Slope Class 9

WKNgl L L L L M H H H H WSN M M M M H H H H H WSNgl M M M M H H H H H ZAV L L L L M H H H H ZDL NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR ZGW NR L NR H NR NR NR NR NR ZRB NR NR NR L M H H H H ZUN L L L M H H H H H ZWA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

NOTES: 1 Soil series symbols are defined in Table 2-5. 2 Slope classes are associated with the following slope gradients: 1: 0%-0.5%; 2: 0.5%-2%; 3: 2%-5%; 4: 5%-10%; 5: 10%-15%; 6: 15%-30%; 7: 30%-45%; 8: 45%-70%; 9: 70%-100% N/A – not applicable NR – not rated

For the water erosion risk classes identified for each combination of material type, biogeoclimatic (BGC) zone or Soil Correlation Area (SCA), and slope class in non-agricultural lands in Alberta and all lands in British Columbia in the PEAA, see Table B-3.

Table B-3 Water Erosion Risk Classes for Non-agricultural Lands in Alberta and All Lands in British Columbia

Material Type

BEC Zone or SCA1

Assumptions

Water Erosion Risk Class Slope Class 1-32

Slope Class 4

Slope Class 5

Slope Class 6-10

Anthropogenic (A) All zones N/A N/A N/A N/A Colluvium (C) Weathered Bedrock (D)

CWH, MH Stones, boulders, gravel; with coarse-textured matrix in places; slopes 200 m; mostly inclined

M H H H

CMH As above L M H H

Page 51: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

2010 Page B-11

Table B-3 Water Erosion Risk Classes for Non-agricultural Lands in Alberta and All Lands in British Columbia (cont’d)

Material Type

BEC Zone or SCA1

Assumptions

Water Erosion Risk Class Slope Class 1-32

Slope Class 4

Slope Class 5

Slope Class 6-10

Till (Morainal) (M) SBS, ESSF, BWBS, SCA 13, SCA 17

Medium texture Slopes length 200 m; mostly inclined

L M H H

CWH, MH Coarse texture; gravelly, stony, bouldery; slopes 100 m; inclined, undulating, hummocky

M H H H

CMH, SBS, ESSF

As above L M H H

Glaciofluvial (FG) Fluvial (F), Fluvial (FA)

Eolian (E)

BWBS, SCA 13, SCA 17

Medium texture; slopes <100 m; mostly undulating, hummocky

L L M H

CWH, MH Very coarse texture; slopes <100 m; mostly undulating

L M H H

CMH, SBS, ESSF

L L H H

Glaciolacustrine (LG) Lacustrine (L) Marine (W)

BWBS, SCA 13, SCA 17

L L L H

CWH, MH Moderately fine texture; slopes 100 m; mostly undulating

H H H H

CMH As above M H H H SBS, ESSF As above M M H H BWBS, SCA 13, SCA 17

As above L M H H

Glaciomarine (WG) CWH, MH Medium to moderately coarse texture; slopes 1200 m.a.s.l.; undulating, inclined

H H H H

SBS, ESSF, CMH

M H H H

Page 52: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

Page B-12 2010

Table B-3 Water Erosion Risk Classes for Non-agricultural Lands in Alberta and All Lands in British Columbia (cont’d)

Material Type

BEC Zone or SCA1

Assumptions

Water Erosion Risk Class Organic (O) All Zones L L L L Rock (R) All N/A N/A N/A N/A Water (N) All N/A N/A N/A N/A

NOTES: 1 Abbreviations: BEC – biogeoclimatic; SCA – soil correlation area; CMH – Coastal Mountain Heather; CWH – Coastal

Western Hemlock; MH – Mountain Hemlock; BWBS – Boreal White and Black Spruce; ESSF – Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir; SBS – Sub-Boreal Spruce, N/A – not applicable

2 Slope classes are associated with the following slope gradients: 1–3: 0%–5%; 4: 5%–10%; 5: 10%–15%; 6–8: 15%–100%

B.3 Wind Erosion Risk Classes This section presents the wind erosion risk classes associated with dominant soil series in the PEAA. The method used for assessing wind erosion risk is outlined in Section 2.8.1.

For the wind erosion risk classes for each soil series identified in agricultural lands in Alberta in the PEAA, see Table B-4.

Table B-4 Wind Erosion Risk Classes for Soil Series in Agricultural Lands of Alberta

Soil Series Symbol1 Wind Erosion Risk Class AGS L AGSgl L ARM L BITxt L BLB L CMO L CMOgl L COA L COAgl L DEV L DEVyc L DKN L DMY L DNT L DUG L DUGgl L

Page 53: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

2010 Page B-13

Table B-4 Wind Erosion Risk Classes for Soil Series in Agricultural Lands of Alberta (cont’d)

Soil Series Symbol1 Wind Erosion Risk Class DUGglxt L ELP H FKE L GOY L GRZ L GRZaa L GRZaagl L GRZgl L GSP L HAT M HGT L HGTpt L HGTxt L HRL L HRLxt L HUB L HUBaa L HUBgl L JIFF L JVE L KNZaa L KVG L MAK L MCO M MCOgl M MJU L MLA L MLAgl L MLAglxt L MLAxt L MLT L MLY L MMO L MNTaa L MYW L MYWgl L

Page 54: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

Page B-14 2010

Table B-4 Wind Erosion Risk Classes for Soil Series in Agricultural Lands of Alberta (cont’d)

Soil Series Symbol1 Wind Erosion Risk Class MYWxt L NKU L NVR L NVRxt L ONW L ONWpt L POK L PRM L,H PRS M PRSgl M PTO M PTOaa M PTOaagl M RB L RLV L RLVgl L RVN L RVNpt L RVNxt L TBY L TBYgl L TGL L WAB L,M WKN L WKNgl L WSN L WSNgl L ZAV L ZDL NR ZGW L ZRB L ZUN L ZWA N/A 2

NOTE: 1 Soil series symbols are defined in Table 2-5. 2 N/A - not applicable

Page 55: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

2010 Page B-15

For the wind erosion risk classes identified for each combination of material type, biogeoclimatic (BEC) zone or Soil Correlation Area (SCA), and slope class in non-agricultural lands in Alberta and all lands in British Columbia in the PEAA, see Table B-5.

Table B-5 Wind Erosion Risk Classes for Non-agricultural Lands in Alberta and All Lands in British Columbia

Material Type

BEC Zone, SCA1

Assumptions

Drainage Class2

Wind Erosion Risk Class

Anthropogenic (A) All N/A N/A N/A Colluvium (C) Till (Morainal) (M)

CWH, MH, CMH, ESSF Colluvium - Stones, boulders, gravel; with coarse textured matrix in places Till - Coarse texture, high coarse fragments

VR, R, W, MW M

BWBS, SBS, SCA 13, SCA 17

Medium texture VR, R, W, MW L

Weathered Bedrock (D) All Medium to coarse texture; high coarse fragments

VR, R, W, MW M

Glaciofluvial (FG), Fluvial (F, FA), Eolian

All Very coarse texture VR, R, W, MW H

Glaciolacustrine (LG) Lacustrine (L) Marine (W)

All Moderately fine texture VR, R, W, MW L

Rock (R) All N/A Water (N) All N/A Glaciomarine (WG) All Medium to moderately

coarse texture VR, R, W, MW M

All All All I, P, VP L

NOTES: 1 Abbreviations: BEC – biogeoclimatic; SCA – soil correlation area; CMH – Coastal Mountain Heather;

CWH – Coastal Western Hemlock; MH – Mountain Hemlock; BWBS – Boreal White and Black Spruce; ESSF – Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir; SBS – Sub-Boreal Spruce

2 Drainage classes: VR – very rapid; R – rapid; W – well; MW – moderately well. Drainage classes are defined in Soil Classification Working Group (1998).

N/A - not applicable

B.4 Compaction and Puddling Risk Classes This section presents compaction and puddling risk classes associated with dominant soil series in the PEAA. Methodology for assessment of compaction and puddling risk is outlined in Section 2.9.

For the compaction and puddling risk classes for each combination of soil series and slope class identified in agricultural lands in Alberta in the PEAA, see Table B-6.

Page 56: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

Page B-16 2010

Table B-6 Compaction and Puddling Risk Classes for Soil Series in Agricultural Lands in Alberta

Soil Series Symbol1 Compaction and Puddling Risk Class AGS M AGSgl M ARM M BITxt H BLB M

CMO M CMOgl M COA M COAgl M DEV H DEVyc H DKN H DMY H DNT M DUG M DUGgl H DUGglxt H EBG M ELP M FKE H GOY L GRZ M GRZaa M GRZaagl H GRZgl H GSP M HAT LM HGT H HGTpt H HGTxt H HRL H HRLxt H

HUB M HUBaa M HUBgl M

Page 57: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

2010 Page B-17

Table B-6 Compaction and Puddling Risk Classes for Soil Series in Agricultural Lands in Alberta (cont’d)

Soil Series Symbol1 Compaction and Puddling Risk Class

JIFF M, MH JVE M, MH, H KNZaa H KVG M MAK H MCO M MCOgl H MJU M MLA H MLAgl H MLAglxt H MLAxt M MLT H MLY M MMO M MNTaa H MYW M MYWgl H MYWxt M NKU MH NVR H NVRxt H ONW H ONWpt H POK M,MH PRM L,LH PRS L PRSgl L PTO L PTOaa L PTOaagl L RB M RLV M

Page 58: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

Page B-18 2010

Table B-6 Compaction and Puddling Risk Classes for Soil Series in Agricultural Lands in Alberta (cont’d)

Soil Series Symbol1 Compaction and Puddling Risk Class RLVgl M RVN H RVNpt H RVNxt H TBY M TBYgl M TGL M WAB M,MH,H WKN M WKNgl M WSN M WSNgl M ZAV M,MH ZDL NR ZGW M ZRB M,L ZUN L,M ZWA N/A NOTES: 1 Soil series symbols are defined in Table 2-5. N/A - not applicable

For the compaction and puddling risk classes for each combination of material type, BEC zone or SCA, and drainage class identified in non-agricultural lands in Alberta and all lands in British Columbia in the PEAA, see Table B-7.

Table B-7 Compaction and Puddling Risk Classes for Non-agricultural Lands in Alberta and for All Lands in British Columbia

Material Type BEC Zone, SCA1 Assumptions Drainage

Class2 Risk Class Anthropogenic (A) All N/A N/A N/A Colluvium (C) Till (Morainal) (M)

CWH, MH, CMH, ESSF Colluvium - Stones, boulders, gravel; with coarse textured matrix in places

VR, R, W, MW, I

L

Till - Coarse texture, high coarse fragments

P, VP M

BWBS, SBS, SCA 13, SCA 17

Medium texture VR, R, W, MW, I

M

P, VP H

Page 59: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape

Soils Technical Data Report Appendix B: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture, Water Erosion, Wind Erosion and Compaction Ratings for Soil Types in the PEAA

2010 Page B-19

Table B-7 Compaction and Puddling Risk Classes for Non-agricultural Lands in Alberta and for All Lands in British Columbia

Material Type BEC Zone, SCA1 Assumptions Drainage

Class2 Risk Class Weathered Bedrock (D) All Medium to coarse

texture; high coarse fragments

VR, R, W, MW, I

L

P, VP M Glaciofluvial (FG), Fluvial (F, FA), Eolian (E)

All Very coarse texture VR, R, W, MW, I

L

P, VP M Glaciolacustrine (LG) Lacustrine (L) Marine (W)

All Moderately fine texture VR, R, W, MW, I, P, VP

H

Rock (R) All N/A Water (N) All N/A Glaciomarine (WG) All Medium to moderately

coarse texture VR, R, W, MW, I

M

P, VP H Organic All P, VP H

NOTES: 1 Abbreviations: BEC – biogeoclimatic; SCA – soil correlation area; CMH – Coastal Mountain Heather;

CWH – Coastal Western Hemlock; MH – Mountain Hemlock; BWBS – Boreal White and Black Spruce; ESSF – Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir; SBS – Sub Boreal Spruce

2 Drainage classes: VR – very rapidly; R – rapidly; W – well; MW - moderately well. Drainage classes are defined in Soil Classification Working Group (1998).

N/A – not applicable

Page 60: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada - Canada.ca€¦ · Soils Technical Data Report Appendix A: Soil Landscape Models 2010 Page A-3 Appendix A provides an overview of the soil landscape