immunoinformatics in diabetes

Upload: mio-caguicla

Post on 07-Aug-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/20/2019 Immunoinformatics in Diabetes

    1/8

    [Draft 1] Diabetes — Immunology 

    of1 8

      Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is a T cell mediated autoimmune disease in which the

    insulin-producing pancreatic islet beta-cells in the pancreas of genetically susceptible are

    selectively eliminated. Such destruction within the pancreas leads to insuling deficiency, and

    eventually hyperglycemia—an excess of glucose in the body (Scott et al. 2010). Studies inmice and men in recent studies show that autoreactive CD8 T cells in humans are involved in

    both the initiation of the disease and the destruction of beta-cells (Unger et al. 2011). Although

    CD4 and CD8 cells are requried for disease development, the latter plays an important role in

    the initiation of tissue damage and promotion of diabetes progression by directly targeting

    beta-cells. They also target, aside from insulin, different autoantigens in the ß-cells such as

    islet specific glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit related protein (IGRP), dystrophia

    myotonica kinase (DMK), and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD). Among these, insulin is the

    autoantigens detected in mice, leading to the suggestion that removing or regulating insuling-

    reactive CD8 T cells may protect against diabetes (Scott et al. 2010). T cells that react to islet

    beta cells can contribute to the autoimmune response in diabetic patients and also play a part

    in self-tolerance in healthy individuals. The rarity of these cells and inadequate technology

    has impaired the examination of this paradigm; thus, the mechanism for the development of

    T1DM are not fully understood.

    This gap in our knowledge is a result of many constraints on such studies. Most

    importantly, islet-infiltrating T cells from patients with diabetes are very rarely available for

    expansion and cloning to examine their CTL potential, while the search for such cells

    trafficking in the peripheral blood requires prior knowledge of the autoantigens targeted and

    the epitopes and HLA-presenting molecules involved. To address these requirements, a study

    was conducted by Skowera et al. (2008) created surrogate !  cells expressing a single

    autoantigen and HLA class I molecule and investigated their naturally displayed peptide

    repertoire. This uncovered the signal peptide (SP) as a source of preproinsulin (PPI) epitopes

  • 8/20/2019 Immunoinformatics in Diabetes

    2/8

    [Draft 1] Diabetes — Immunology 

    of2 8

    that constitute major targets of CD8+ T cell responses in HLA-A2+ patients with type 1

    diabetes. (Skowera et al. 2008).

    Epitopes have through the process referred to as “reverse” immunology requiring the

    immunization of HLA-A2 transgenic mice. Although, this strategy may introduce false-positiveresults as the majority of epitopes identified display at least one amino acid difference with the

    endogenous murine sequence, rendering them xeno-antigens to the HLA-A2 transgenic mice.

    Nonetheless, several of these epitopes are recognized by CD8 T-cells of type 1 diabetic

    patients. Alternatively, islet-specific autoreactive CD8 T-cell reactivity has been detected

    against an insulin epitope identified by high HLA-binding affinity using HLA-A2 tetramers and

    cytokine secretion assays. An epitope that lies in the signal peptide (i.e., PPI15-24) was

    identified as a major target of CD8 T-cell responses in HLA-A2" T1D patients (Unger 2011).

    To examine the functional properties of PPI SP–reactive CD8+ T cells, short-term

    CD8+ T cell lines from HLA-A2+ patients with type 1 diabetes who showed appropriate

    ELISPOT reactivity were established; focusing on the PPI15–24

    epitope because of its

    relative immunodominance. From these lines, cells staining with PPI15-24-loaded HLA-A2

    tetramers (PPI15–24 –Tmr) were sorted by flow cytometry and expanded, yielding 5 PPI15–

    24 –Tmr +CD8+ T cell clones from a single patient. Clones showed HLA-A2–restricted

    responses to PPI15–24, either when PPI15–24 peptide was presented after pulsing of HLA-

     A2-autologous antigen-presenting cells or when it was presented naturally by K562-PPI-A2

    cells. These results indicate that circulating autoreactive CD8+ T cells in patients with type 1

    diabetes recognize ! cell–specific targets and have cytotoxic capability (Skowera et al. 2008).

  • 8/20/2019 Immunoinformatics in Diabetes

    3/8

    [Draft 1] Diabetes — Immunology 

    of3 8

      In recent years, it has become apparent that in some patients, there is a considerable

    overlap between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. A small subset of patients with type 2 diabetes

    (10%) in the course of disease development produce autoantibodies characteristic of type 1

    diabetes: antibodies to insulin, GAD, and IA-2 (McDevitt 2005). Autoantibodies are created by the immune system when it fails to distinguish between

    “self” and “non-self”. As mentioned above, A small subset of patients with type 2 diabetes

    (10%) in the course of disease development produce autoantibodies characteristic of type 1

    diabetes: antibodies to insulin, GAD, and IA-2.

    It has been reported that approximately 50% of the genetic risk for T1DM can be

    attributed to the HLA region. The highest risk HLA-DR3/4 DQ8 genotype has been shown to

    be highly associated with beta-cell autoimmunity. The first antibodies described in association

    with the development of T1DM were islet cell autoantibodies (ICA). Subsequently, antibodies

    to insulin (IAA), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAA or GAD) and protein tyrosine phosphatase

    (IA2 or ICA512) have all been defined. The number of antibodies, rather than the individual

    antibody, is thought to be most predictive of progression to overt diabetes (Taplin & Barker,

    2008).

    Antibodies to Insulin 

    The fact that 10% of patients with type 2 diabetes are found to have autoantibodies

    characteristic of type 1 diabetes and to have lower C-peptide levels suggests that this is not a

    case of a simple coincidence of two relatively common diseases. This result is because of the

    known incidence of type 1 diabetes in the general population. In the general population, 20%

    lack aspartic acid at DQ 57 on both chromosomes. Thus, at HLA, 20% of the population could

    be said to be potentially susceptible to type 1 diabetes. Despite this, only 0.5–0.8% of the

    population develop type 1 diabetes. Assuming that there is no association between HLA and

  • 8/20/2019 Immunoinformatics in Diabetes

    4/8

    [Draft 1] Diabetes — Immunology 

    of4 8

    type 2 diabetes (which has been shown in several early studies),  the existence in 10% of type

    2 diabetic patients of autoantibody characteristics of type 1 diabetes suggests that the

    additional stress produced on islet cells by the necessity to produce more than usual amounts

    of insulin can, in individuals who are susceptible at the HLA region, lead to the developmentof autoantibodies, insulitis, and exhaustion of the insulin-producing cells, with a corresponding

    decrease in C-peptide and a distinctly different phenotype (McDevitt 2005).

    When IgM and IgG antibodies against insulin, the body reacts as if the insulin is

    foreign. This makes insulin less effective, or not effective at all. This process results to

    hyperglycemia, eventually progressing to T1DM (Eisenbarth 2011).

    Regardless of purity and origin, therapeutic insulins continue to be immunogenic in

    humans. However, severe immunological complications occur rarely, and less severe events

    affect a small minority of patients. Insulin autoantibodies (IAAs) may be detectable in insulin-

    naive individuals who have a high likelihood of developing type 1 diabetes or in patients who

    have had viral disorders, have been treated with various drugs, or have autoimmune

    disorders or paraneoplastic syndromes. This suggests that under certain circumstances,

    immune tolerance to insulin can be overcome. Factors that can lead to more or less

    susceptibility to humoral responses to exogenous insulin include the recipient’s immune

    response genes, age, the presence of sufficient circulating autologous insulin, and the site of

    insulin delivery. Little proof exists, however, that the development of insulin antibodies (IAs) to

    exogenous insulin therapy affects integrated glucose control, insulin dose requirements, and

    incidence of hypoglycemia, or contributes to !-cell failure or to long-term complications of

    diabetes. (Fineberg et al. 2013).

    Past epitope analysis of IAA have utilized naturally occurring isoforms of insulin. In two

    studies, human, bovine and porcine insulin were used to reveal differences in the binding

    characteristics of IAA and anti-bodies to exogenous administered insulin (IA), locating the

  • 8/20/2019 Immunoinformatics in Diabetes

    5/8

    [Draft 1] Diabetes — Immunology 

    of5 8

    major binding site of IA to the A-chain, while type 1 diabetes-associated IAA recognize a

    conformational epitope requiring both the A- and B-chain. Differences in epitope specificities

    of IAA and IA were also detected using random peptide phage display. Monoclonal antibodies

    and their Fab are being used successfully in the epitope analysis of other autoantibodies intype 1 diabetes. This method is particularly useful in the study of conformational epitopes as

    the structure of the antigen remains intact (Padoa et al. 2005).

      IA responses consisting of virtually all Ig classes and IgG subclasses have been

    reported. Insulin-specific antibodies are primarily composed of IgG1–4 antibodies, but IgM,

    IgA, and IgE have been reported. Anti-insulin IgM has been detected during early insulin

    treatment. Also reported are the presence of that class in patients with immunological insulin

    resistance. IgA have been detected in patients and were associated IgA with allergic reactions

    in patients with diabetes (Fineberg et al. 2013)

    These autoantibodies to insulin and their corresponding epitopes have not been well

    characterized until a study by Padoa et al. (2005) cloned and characterized the recombinant

    Fab of the insulin-specific monoclonal anti-body CG7C7. In an effort to identify the epitope

    recognized by CG7C7, competition assays with insulin-specific monoclonal anti-bodies mAb 1

    and mAb 125 were performed. Both antibodies have well-defined epitopes, binding of mAb 1

    is strictly dependent on amino acid residue B30, binding of mAb 125 is directed predominantly

    to the A-chain loop.

    Antibodies to Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase (IA2 or ICA512)

    Islet antigen-2 (IA-2), previously known also as ICA-512, is a major target of islet cell

    autoantibodies. The protein is found in neural tissue and cells of the pancreatic islets, and its

    gene has been localized to chromosome 2q35. The cDNA encodes a 979 amino acid

  • 8/20/2019 Immunoinformatics in Diabetes

    6/8

    [Draft 1] Diabetes — Immunology 

    of6 8

    transmembrane protein which is enzymatically inactive, and a related PTP-like molecule

    termed IA-2!  or phogrin is also a major islet autoantigen whose location and intracellular

    domain are 74% identical to IA-2. Autoantibodies to IA-2 are present in up to 80% of children

    and adolescents at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes.

    IA-2 could be a primary target of the immune process which is believed to destroy the

    insulin-secreting islet cells. Alternatively, IA-2A might develop as a consequence of this

    destructive process, releasing the sequestered antigen IA-2 and thus inducing the immune

    response (Decochez 2014).

    Antibodies to GAD

     Antibodies to the 64,000 M r , proteins are the earliest and most reliable predictive

    marker of IDDM in humans and are also present in the two animal models for IDDM, the non-

    obese diabetic (NOD) mouse and the Bio-breeding rat (Kaufman et al. 1992).

    Baekkeskov et al. (1990) reported that the 64,000 M r  islet cell auto-antigen is a form of

    glutamate decarboxylase (GAD; E.C.4.1.1.15), the enzyme responsible for the synthesis of y-

    aminobutyric acid (GABA) in brain, peripheral neurons, pancreas, and other organs. It is

    shown that the brain contains two forms of GAD, which are encoded by two separate genes.

    The two GADs (GAD65 and GAD67) differ in molecular size (with M r s = 65,000 and 67,000)

    and amino acid sequence (with ~30% sequence divergence), as well as in their intracellular

    distributions and interactions with the GAD cofactor pyridoxal phosphate (Erlander et al.

    1991).

    Both GAD67 and GAD65 are targets of autoantibodies in people who later develop type

    1 diabetes mellitus or latent autoimmune diabetes. Lethagen et al. (2001) screened 441

  • 8/20/2019 Immunoinformatics in Diabetes

    7/8

    [Draft 1] Diabetes — Immunology 

    of7 8

    nondiabetic patients with autoimmune thyroiditis (AT) for GADab to study whether antibodies

    to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADab) are associated with subclinical !-cell damage and

    impaired insulin secretion.

    Islet Cell Antibodies

    The pancreatic islets or islets of Langerhans are the regions of the pancreas that

    contain its endocrine (i.e., hormone-producing) cells. The beta cells of the pancreatic islets

    secrete insulin, and so play a significant role in diabetes. It is thought that they are destroyed

    by immune assaults. However, there are also indications that beta cells have not been

    destroyed but have only become non-functional.

    In an experiement conducted by Bottazzo et al. (1974), Antibodies to pancreatic islet

    cells were found by immunofluorescence in the sera of 13 patients with multiendocrine

    deficiencies associated with organ-specific autoimmunity. 10 of these patients were diabetic.

    The antibodies were complement fixing and of IgG class; titres varied from 1 to 160 and were

    independent of insulin treatment. The presence of organ-specific pancreatic antibodies

    supports the hypothesis of an autoimmune form of diabetes mellitus put forward to explain the

    histological " insulitis " found in selected cases of this disease. This new marker allows the

    segregation of a homogeneous group of insulin-dependent diabetics who may well prove to

    have a different metabolic pattern from that in other forms of inherited diabetes mellitus.

  • 8/20/2019 Immunoinformatics in Diabetes

    8/8

    [Draft 1] Diabetes — Immunology 

    of8 8

    References

    Baekkesko S, Aanstoot S, Christgau A,Reetz M, Solimena M.Cascalho F, Foli H ,Richter-Olesen and DeCamilli P. (1990).Identification of the 64K autoantigen ininsulin-dependent diabetes as theGABA-

      synthesizing enzyme glutamic aciddecarboxylase. Nature(London.).347:151-156.

    Bottazzo GF, Florin-Christensen A,Doniach D 1974 Islet-cell antibodies indiabetes mellitus with autoimmunepolyendocrine deficiencies. Lancet 2:1279–

      1283

    Decochez, Katelijn. IA-2 antibodies[internet]. 2014 Aug 13; Diapedia21042821251 rev. no. 14. Availablefrom:http://dx.doi.org/10.14496/dia.21042821251.14

    Eisenbarth GS, Buse JB. (2011). Type 1diabetes mellitus. In: Melmed S,Polonsky KS, Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM,eds. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology.12th ed. Philadelphia, PA: SaundersElsevier; chap 32.

    Taplin C & Barker J. 2008. Autoantibodies in type1 diabetes. Autoimmunity. Vol. 4 1 ( 1 ) . p p11-18 DOI:10.1080/08916930701619169

    Erlander MG, Tillakaratne S, Feldblum N,Patel and Tobin AJ. (1991)Two genesencode distinct glutamate decarboxylaseswith different responses to pyridoxalphosphate. Neuron. 7:91-100.

    Fineberg, E., Kawabata, T., Finco-Kent, D.,Fountaine, R., Finch, G., & Krasner, A.(2007). Immunological responses toexogenous insulin. Endocrine SocietyJournals and Publications, 28(6).

    Kaufman DL, Erlander MG, Clare-Salzler M, Atkinson MA, Maclaren NK, Tobin AJ

    (1992). "Autoimmunity to two forms ofglutamate decarboxylase in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus". J. Clin.Invest. 89 (1): 283–92.doi:10.1172/JCI115573. PMC 442846.PMID 1370298.

    Lethagen, Å., Erricson, U., Hallengren, B.,Groop, L., & Tuomi, T. (2001).Glumatic acid decarboxylaseantibody positivity is associated with animpaired insulin response to glucose and

    arginine in nondiabetic patients withautoimmune thyroditis. Journal of ClinicalEndrocrinology and Metabolism, 87(3).

    McDevitt, H. (2006). Characteristics ofautoimmunity in type 1 diabetes and type1.5 overlap with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes, 54(2), 4-10.

    Pihoker, C., Gilliam, L., Hampe, C., & Lernmark, Å.(2005). Antibodies in diabetes. Diabetes,54(2), 52-61.

    Scott, G., Fishman, S., Khai Siew, L.,

    Margalit, A., Chapman, S., Chervonsky, A.,# Wong, S. (2010). Immunotargeting ofinsulin reactive CD8 T cells to preventDiabetes. Journal of Autoimmunity, 35,390-397.

    Skowera, A., Ellis, R., Varela-Calviño, R., Arif, S.,Huang, G., Van Krinks, C., #Peakman, M.(2008). CTLs are targeted to kill beta-cells inpatients with type 1 diabetes throughrecognition of a glucose-regulatedpreproinsulin epitope. The Journal ofClinical Investigation, 118(10), 3390-3401.

    Unger, W., Velthuis, J., Abreu, J., Sandra, S.,Quinten, E., Kester, M., #Roep, B.(2011).Discovery of low-affinity preproinsulinepitopes and detection of autoreactive CD8T-cells using combinatorial MHC multimers.Journal of Autoimmunity, 37, 151-159.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1370298https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubMed_Identifierhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC442846https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubMed_Centralhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14496/dia