imidazolium-modified clay-based abs nanocomposites: a comparison between melt-blending and...
TRANSCRIPT
POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008; 19: 1576–1583
ce.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/pat.1172
Published online 9 June 2008 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscienImidazolium-modified clay-based ABS nanocomposites:
a comparison between melt-blending and
solution-sonication processesy
M. Modesti1*, S. Besco1, A. Lorenzetti1, M. Zammarano2, V. Causin3, C. Marega3,
J. W. Gilman2, D. M. Fox4, P. C. Trulove5, H. C. De Long6 and P.H. Maupin7
1Department of Chemical Process Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy2Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA3Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padova, via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy4Department of Chemistry, American University, Washington DC 20016-8014, USA5Chemistry Department, US Naval Academy 572M Holloway Rd, Annapolis, MD 21402-5026, USA6Directorate of Chemistry and Life Sciences, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Arlington, VA 22203-1768, USA7Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585, USA
Received 21 February 2008; Revised 25 March 2008; Accepted 25 March 2008
�CorrespoEngineerE-mail: myThis artidomain iPart of thStandardAir Forcesubject toequipmenidentifiedexperimeor recommForce. Thin all its pfor all orifrom orgameasuremuncertain
Acrylonitrile--butadiene--styrene (ABS) nanocomposites containing imidazolium-modified mon-
tmorillonite have been prepared by melt-blending (MB) and solution-sonication in order to study
the effects of processing on the morphology and properties of the polymer/clay composites. The
structure-property relationships of the prepared composites have been studied by means of X-ray
diffraction (XRD), transmission electronmicroscopy (TEM),mechanical testing, dynamic-mechanical
analyses (DMA), thermal gravimetrical analyses (TGA), fluorescence probe confocal microscopy,
and fluorescence spectroscopy (FS). X-Ray and TEM show that both nanocomposites have a mixed
intercalated/exfoliated structure. Fluorescence probe confocal microscopy reveals that the sonicated
sample has a more homogeneous dispersion: this result is confirmed by the values of elongation at
break and flexural elastic modulus measured for the composites. Fluorescence spectroscopy has also
been used to investigate the distribution of clay in the composites and results indicate that clay layers
in ABS are preferentially located in the styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN) phase, independent of the
dispersion process used. Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
KEYWORDS: ABS; imidazolium salts; solution processing; melt-blending; nanocomposites; Nile Blue A; fluorescence probe
INTRODUCTION
The production of polymer/organically modified layered
silicate (OMLS or clay) nanocomposites has been accom-
plished by several routes, including in situ polymerization of
monomer/clay intercalates, solution-intercalation, and melt-
compounding.1–4
ndence to: M. Modesti, Department of Chemical Processing, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, [email protected] is a U.S. Government work and is in the publicn the U.S.A.is work was carried out by the National Institute ofs and Technology (NIST), US Naval Academy, and USagencies of the US government, and by statute is notcopyright in the United States. Certain commercialt, instruments, materials, services, or companies arein this paper in order to specify adequately the
ntal procedure. This in no way implies endorsementendation by NIST, US Naval Academy, or the US Air
e policy of NIST is to use metric units of measurementublications, and to provide statements of uncertaintyginal measurements. In this document however, datanizations outside NIST are shown, which may includeents in non-metric units or measurements withoutty statements.
Melt-blending (MB) is by far the most common because it
involves the processing operations commonly adopted for
the parent polymers and does not require the use of organic
solvents; however, the high temperature, shear stress, and
local overheating induced by the shear itself can affect the
clay through thermal degradation of the organic modifier,
phase separation of the clay, and possible reduction in the
aspect ratio of the layered silicate.5,6
Low temperature processing techniques or OMLS with
enhanced thermal stabilities have been developed in order to
avoid thermal degradation of clay’s surfactant during the
preparation of the composite. The thermal degradation of
alkyl-ammonium-salts, commonly used as surfactant for
OMLS, becomes significant above 2008C,7 thus, the use of
clays in polymers requiring higher processing temperature is
challenging. Alternative clay surfactants, like imidazolium
or phosphonium salts, have been used in order to enhance
the thermal stability of OMLS.8,9 As a different approach, a
low temperature solution-intercalation process can be used
to avoid thermal degradation of OMLS. In the solution-
intercalation procedure, a solvent capable of dissolving
the polymer and swelling the clay is selected and a
well dispersed heterogeneous three-component mixture of
Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Imidazolium-modified clay-based ABS nanocomposites 1577
appropriate composition is prepared with the help of
heating, mechanical stirring, and/or ultrasonication. The
solvent can then be removed by evaporation or by
precipitation of the polymer/clay composite in a co-solvent.
The acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) chosen in this
work is an interesting, widely used engineering thermo-
plastic owing to its desirable properties which include good
mechanical behavior and chemical resistance.10 There
are still only a few reports about the preparation of ABS/
clay nanocomposites with solution-intercalation techniques.
Pourabas et al. 10 developed a co-solvent method for
the preparation of ABS/clay nanocomposite: the polymer
nanocomposite was precipitated from an ABS-tetrahydro-
furan stirred solution containing organic-modified mon-
tmorillonite by addition of ethanol (precipitating solvent).
The final product exhibited an intercalated structure with a
uniform interlayer spacing of the silicate layers.
In the present work dimethyl-hexadecyl-imidazolium-
modifiedmontmorillonite (DMHDIM–MMT) has been chosen
for the preparation of polymer nanocomposites usingMB and
solution-intercalation techniques. The aim is to investigate the
effectiveness and influence of these two different processes on
dispersion, morphology, and properties of the ABS/clay
nanocomposites, in order to obtain a material that would
combine the excellent mechanical behavior provided by low
amounts of inorganic nanoparticles with the versatility and
easy processing characteristics of rubber-toughened thermo-
plastic.
In our previous work 11 we had studied the effect of the
clay surfactant on the properties of the nanocomposites
prepared by solution-intercalation. The results have con-
firmed the outstanding stability of DMHDIM–MMT as well
as its improved compatibility with ABS matrix with respect
to traditional ammonium salts-based surfactants.
In this work, the morphology, mechanical properties, and
thermal stability of the composites have been assessed by
X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy
(TEM), dynamic-mechanical analyses (DMA), thermal gravi-
metric analyses (TGA), and by fluorescence spectroscopy
(FS) of optical probes. The last one is an innovative technique
for the rapid evaluation of intercalation and exfoliation in
polymer-clay nanocomposites.12 Preliminary findings are
reported on probe fluorescence in polymer nanocomposites
prepared fromOMLSwith polystyrene (PS) and polyamide 6
(PA6). In particular Nile Blue A has been found to be a
sensitive probe of the local nano-environment and hence a
useful fluorescence probe when co-exchanged into clay with
traditional quaternary ammonium treatments or, high
temperature stable trialkyl-imidazolium based surfac-
tants.13,14
1% (or wt%) is used throughout this manuscript for mass %.
EXPERIMENTAL
Raw materialsThe ABS grade chosen (Magnum 3904, Dow Chemicals) had
a melt-flow index of 4.7 g/10min (2208C/10 kg, UNI-ISO
1133). Dimethyl-hexadecyl-imidazolium/Nile Bluemodified
montmorillonite (DMHDIM–MMT) was prepared by a
standard cationic-exchange procedure.12,13 Sodium mon-
tmorillonite with an ion-exchange capacity of 92meq/100 g
Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
was obtained from Southern Clay Products (Gonzales, Texas)
and exchanged in water/ethanol (1/1 volume ratio) with
1,2-dimethyl-3-hexadecylimidazolium (DMHDIM) bromide
and Nile Blue A Sulfate (Aldrich). The quantities of
DMHDIM and Nile Blue used were equal to 95 and 5% of
the exchange capacity of the layered silicate, respectively; a
20% excess of Nile Blue was used to compensate the presence
of impurities in Nile Blue (assay content about 80%).
DMHDIM was prepared and purified as previously
reported.12,15,16
Preparation of compositesOMLS were dispersed in ABS by ultrasonic solution
blending (US) or MB. US samples were prepared by first
dissolving and stirring ABS in refluxing acetone in a three
neck reflux flask. A dispersion of OMLS in the same solvent
was added to the solution to obtain 5wt%1 concentration of
OMLS in the polymer/clay composite after solvent removal
(ABS/DMHDIM–MMT 5wt%—US). Ultrasonic mixing
(Bransons 1510, maximum power 70W at 72 kHz) was
applied for 6 hr to disperse the OMLS in acetone and the
polymer solution after addition of the OMLS dispersion.
The solvent was then evaporated under vacuum at 508C, andthe composite was dried under vacuum at 1008C for 4 hr to
remove the solvent residue from the solid.
MB composites (ABS/DMHDIM–MMT 5wt%—MB)were
produced by mixing the molten polymer with 5wt% of
OMLS in a 50 cm3 Brabender apparatus working at 1908Cand 4.8 rad/s with a residence time of 5min. The obtained
composites were then compression molded with a Collin
P200 press at 2008C and 30 bar during a 600 sec cycle (with a
cooling rate of 0.58C/sec) to obtain specimens for morpho-
logical and mechanical characterization.
Wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD)WAXD patterns were recorded in a 2u angular range of
1.5–408 on a Philips X’Pert PRO diffractometer, working in
reflection geometry and equipped with a graphite mono-
chromator on the diffracted beam (CuKa radiation). The
uncertainty in terms of d-spacings was � 0.05 nm (2s).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)TEMmicrographs were acquired with a Philips mod. EM 208
using an acceleration voltage of 100 kV. Specimens were
microtomed using a Leica Ultracut (UCT) after being
embedded in epoxy.
Fluorescence spectroscopy (FS)Fluorescence spectra were obtained using an Ocean Optics
USB2000 spectrometer adapted for fiber optic input with
a 200mm entrance slit width. The light source was a 30W
fluorescent blacklight at 365 nm placed at about 2 cm from
the sample. A bifurcated optical fiber containing seven fibers
of 200mm (core diameter about 1 cm) above and perpen-
dicular to the sample surface was used for collection of
Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008; 19: 1576–1583
DOI: 10.1002/pat
1578 M. Modesti et al.
fluorescent signal. Integration times were 800ms and 2000ms
for ABS nanocomposites and clay-solvent mixtures, respect-
ively. All measurements were made at room temperature.
Mechanical testingsFlexural modulus and deformation at break were measured
using a universal testingmachine (Galdabini, mod. Sun 2500)
operating with a crosshead speed of 2mm/min and with
specimen dimensions according to UNI ISO 178 (bend test).
Measurements were conducted at room temperature, with
uncertainties of 0.1N and 1mm.
Dynamic-mechanical analysis (DMA)Dynamic-mechanical properties of the samples were
measured using DMA 2980 (TA Instruments). Analyses
were performed using a single-cantilever configuration
between �1008C and þ1008C with a heating rate of 58C/min, frequency of 1Hz, and amplitude of 15mm. Glass
transition temperatures were evaluated from the peaks of
loss modulus function with an uncertainty of 1.58C (2s), as
determined by running a polystyrene standard sample five
times. The maximum standard deviation calculated on
experimental data (Fig. 7) is about �0.5% for loss modulus
peak temperature and �2.5% for storage modulus evaluated
at 258C.
Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA)The thermal stability of the ABSmatrix and the polymer-clay
composites were studied on a TA Instruments Q5000
analyzer operating from ambient temperature to 8008Cat a heating rate of 208C/min under nitrogen and air
atmospheres. An uncertainty of 0.1wt% (2s) was determined
Figure 1. WAXD patterns for ABS/DMHDIM–M
blending (MB) and ultrasonic solution blending
Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
by running five replicates of a standard calcium oxalate
sample.
Confocal microscopyA laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM510 Carl Zeiss
Inc.) was used to image the samples. The samples were
hot-pressed prior to analysis. A blue laser (l¼ 488 nm) was
used as the coherent light and images were taken with a
505 nm high-band-pass filter at 20� magnification (scan size
461� 461mm). For each sample, 60 single images were taken
bymoving the focal plane (200 nm thick) and were combined
by overlapping, to build up a two-dimensional intensity
projection.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
WAXD patterns of the composites and the imidazolium clay
are shown in Fig. 1. The OMLS has a d-spacing of 1.7 nm. By
WAXS the structure of the materials produced by solution-
sonication seems to be very similar to that of the analogous
materials produced by melt-compounding; an intense
reflection peak related to a d-spacing of 2.9 nm is present
in the composite’s spectra, suggesting the formation of
intercalated nanocomposites independent of the processing
conditions. Up to three orders of basal reflections can be
detected, indicating the presence of ordered systems of
stacked clay layers. However, X-ray diffraction is not a
reliable method for estimating the extent of exfoliation and
the presence of intercalated tactoids does not exclude
exfoliation.17
Representative TEM micrographs in Fig. 2 show that both
samples have a mixed intercalated/exfoliated morphology.
At low magnification (Fig. 2a and b), the sample ABS/
MT 5wt% composites obtained with melt-
(US). Solid line indicates pristine OMLS.
Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008; 19: 1576–1583
DOI: 10.1002/pat
Figure 2. TEM micrographs for ABS/DMHDIM–MMT 5wt% composites obtained
with melt-blending (a, c) and ultrasonic solution blending (b, d) at different mag-
nifications.
Figure 3. Fluorescence spectra for ABS/DMHDIM–NB–
MMT 5wt% composites obtained with melt-blending (MB)
and ultrasonic solution blending (US). Solid line indicates
pristine OMLS.
Imidazolium-modified clay-based ABS nanocomposites 1579
DMHDIM–MMT 5wt%–MB shows tactoids containing a
larger number of lamellae and, at high magnification
(Fig. 2c and d), clay layers with higher planar dimension.
This suggests that ultrasonication, as compared to MB,
promotes not only a higher extent of exfoliation but also a
more severe reduction in the size of clay platelets due to
fragile fracture.5,6 The previous considerations are deduced
from a limited number of TEM micrographs, where only a
minuscule volume is illuminated, and therefore, it is not
assured that this description represents the bulk of the
samples’ morphology.
Spectroscopy data (Fig. 3) reveal the presence of fluor-
escence (denoted by an intense peak at 610 nm and a weak
one at 480 nm) in the nanocomposites, but no fluorescence in
the OMLS itself due to quenching effects between the dye
molecules.18 Fluorescence has been used for monitoring the
intercalation/exfoliation of the clay.12 It has been shown that
for PA6/DMHDIM–MMT/Nile Blue nanocomposites, the
spectroscopic emission at about 560 nm can be related to
intercalation, while fluorescence effects at 610 nm are
indicative of mixed intercalation/exfoliation structures.
The nature of the emission around 495–500nm is less clear
and could be explained with the desorption of Nile Blue into
the polymer matrix or with the presence of unquenched
higher order aggregates on the clay.12 Emission wavelengths
depend on the nano-confinement of the optical probe and on
the polar character of local environment; thus, fluorescence
spectra can also be used to investigate the preferential
localization of clay in one of the phases composing the
polymer structure (i.e. styrene-acrylonitrile and butadiene).
Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Modified dyed clay has been dispersed in three different
solvents at a concentration of 5wt%. Each solvent is chosen to
mimic the polarity of a different ABS phase: heptane for
butadiene, acetonitrile for acrylonitrile, and toluene for
styrene. In Fig. 4 the fluorescence spectra for the composite
and the clay in the solvents are shown. The fluorescent
spectra for the ABS/OMLS composites reveal two peaks at
Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008; 19: 1576–1583
DOI: 10.1002/pat
Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra for ABS/DMHDIM–NB–
MMT 5wt% composite obtained with solution-intercalation
and for OMLS solutions using representative solvents.
1580 M. Modesti et al.
about 600 and 480 nm (Fig. 3) which appear to be the
combination of the peaks obtained with toluene and
acetonitrile: this observation suggests that clay resides in
the styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN) rigid phase, as previously
observed by Stretz et al. 19
Images collected by confocal microscope (Fig. 5) show
dark areas due to quenching generated by micrometer
aggregates of clay tactoids. The clay will not fluoresce until
the effective distance between fluorophores is at least 3–5 nm.12 The dyed molecules in the intercalated tactoids are most
likely quenched because, as shown by the XRD, the
d-spacing is about 2.9 nm; thus, we assume that the
fluorescence in the sample is mostly generated by dyed
molecules on the external surface of well dispersed clay
tactoids, or on exfoliated layers.
In the composite images (Fig. 5) (generated by super-
imposing 20 individual confocal images) aggregates of
intercalated tactoids with a maximum dimension of about
50mm are observed for the MB sample, these aggregates are
Figure 5. Composite images from the con
NB–MMT 5wt% composites produced by
solution blending. This figure is available
wiley.com/journal/pat
Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
much smaller in the US composites. This result further
supports a more homogeneous dispersion for US sample as
observed on the mesoscale and is consistent with the
indications discussed above from the TEM data (on the
nanoscale). Thus, the combination of the confocal micro-
scopy, XRD, and TEM data indicate that OMLS has a mixed
intercalated/exfoliated structure and a non-homogeneous
dispersion with the MB samples exhibiting greater hetero-
geneity.
The dispersion differences between the composites
obtained with the two processing conditions are confirmed
by mechanical testings results (Fig. 6). An increase of about
30% in flexural modulus, from about 1.5GPa (pristine
polymer) to about 2.0GPa, has been measured for ABS/
DMHDIM–US composite. This is an indication of the
reinforcing effect exerted by the filler particles, limiting
the mobility of the macromolecules. The smaller increase in
flexural modulus for the MB composite (1850GPa, 17%
increase) suggests a superior dispersion in the US sample as
compared to the MB sample because, as is well known, the
elastic modulus is strongly influenced by the actual degree of
dispersion achieved in the nanocomposite.19
A strong reduction of deformation at break (about 75%)
has been measured for all the composites, which might
suggest that the clay aggregates are acting as micro-sized
defects in the composites that initiate the crack propagation.
The materials were also compared using DMA (Fig. 7). The
storage modulus (E’) increases in all nanocomposites as
compared to the neat polymer, over the entire temperature
range. Again, as already evidenced by mechanical testings,
the reinforcing effect is influenced by the filler dispersion: a
34% and 17% increase in E’ at 258C as compared to the
neat polymer (E’¼ 1690MPa) is observed for ABS/
DMHDIM–US (E’¼ 2280MPa) and ABS/DMHDIM–MB
(E’¼ 1990MPa), respectively. The peaks in the loss modulus
plot identify two glass transition temperatures (Fig. 7): a
lower one, typical of the butadiene rubbery phase
(Tg1��908C) and the higher (Tg2� 1108C), typical of the
rigid SAN phase. These parameters are not affected by the
presence of OMLS, as observed also in previous studies.11,19
focal microscope of: ABS/DMHDIM–
(a) melt-blending and (b) ultrasonic
in colour online at www.interscience.
Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008; 19: 1576–1583
DOI: 10.1002/pat
Figure 6. Results of flexural strength testing for ABS/
DMHDIM–MMT 5wt% composites obtained with melt-
blending (MB) and ultrasonic solution blending (US). Para-
meters have been normalized with respect to the properties
measured for pure ABS (matrix). Reported uncertainty is
�2s. Uncertainties, calculated for the normalized values,
are obtained combining individual standard uncertainty
according to the law of propagation of uncertainty.
Imidazolium-modified clay-based ABS nanocomposites 1581
The TGA plots for ABS and polymer/clay composites,
acquired in air and nitrogen at a rate of 208C/min, are shown
in Figs. 8 and 9, respectively. In Fig. 8, two main steps in the
degradation pathway of ABS and its clay composites are
observed. The major mass loss occurs in the first step
between 350 and 4508C: it is attributed to the evolution of
volatiles produced by the decomposition of butadiene
immediately followed by the aromatics of the styrenic
fraction.20 The second step occurs above 4508C, and it is
assigned to the degradation of the carbonaceous products
formed during the first step. No significant increase in
thermal and thermo-oxidative stability is observed for the
nanocomposites as compared to the neat ABS for either
production process. At temperatures higher than 6008C the
experimental residue is equal to the calculated inorganic
Figure 7. Dynamic-mechanical behavior of
obtained with melt-blending (MB) and ultrason
Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
content of the OMLS. In oxidative environments, the onset of
thermal degradation occurs at a slightly lower temperature
in the presence of OMLS. It might be argued that the decrease
in the onset is due to the partial degradation of the clay
surfactant. This phenomenon has been extensively discussed
in a previouswork 11 and it has been shown that themass loss
does not increase proportionally with the OMLS loading
level and, thus, it cannot be due only to the decomposition of
the organic surfactant. Instead, it is believed that OMLS
exerts a catalytic effect on the polymer degradation. Similar
results have been previously reported when the onset of
thermal degradation for the polymer is higher than the onset
of decomposition for the ammonium-based OMLS.11,21
CONCLUSIONS
ABS/clay nanocomposites containing an imidazolium-
salt-modified montmorillonite were prepared by two
different processing methods: the classic melt-intercalation
and a low-temperature solution process. WAXD and TEM
show that with both MB and solution processes, a mixed
intercalated/exfoliated structures is obtained; however,
confocal microscopy, which provides a bulk micrometer
scale characterization, shows that the clay is not homo-
geneously dispersed and that micrometer aggregates of clay
tactoids are present. The sonication process reduces the size
of these aggregates as compared to MB and improves the
degree of dispersion. As expected, the reinforcing action of
the nanofiller in terms of elastic modulus measured by
DMA increases with the extent of dispersion. A strong
reduction in deformation at break has been measured and it
is attributed to the presence of clay aggregates that act as
micro defects in the composites, which may initiate the crack
propagation. Fluorescence spectroscopy suggests the pre-
ferential localization of clay in the rigid SAN phase. No
significant variation in thermal and thermo-oxidative
degradation was observed between the nanocomposites
ABS/DMHDIM–MMT 5wt% composites
ic solution blending (US).
Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008; 19: 1576–1583
DOI: 10.1002/pat
Figure 8. Thermal stability measurements for pure polymer and ABS/DMHDIM–MMT
5wt% composites obtained with melt-blending (MB) and ultrasonic solution blending
(US) (air—208C/min).
Figure 9. Thermal stability measurements for pure polymer and ABS/DMHDIM–MMT
5wt% composites obtained with melt-blending (MB) and ultrasonic solution blending
(US) (nitrogen—208C/min).
1582 M. Modesti et al.
prepared by sonication and MB or between the nanocompo-
sites and the neat polymer. All these data clearly show that,
for the system studied in this work, solution-intercalation is
more effective at dispersing and improving mechanical
properties than MB, and that fluorescence spectroscopy and
confocal microscopy using fluorescence-probe modified clay
are complimentary characterization techniques when used
with WAXS and TEM.
AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Marcus T. Cicerone, Polymers Division,
NIST, for allowing use of their confocal microscope.
Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
1. Giannelis EP, Krishnamoorti R, Manias E. Polymer-silicatenanocomposites: model systems for confined polymers andpolymer brushes. Adv. Polym. Sci. 1999; 138: 107–147.
2. Alexandre M, Dubois P. Polymer-layered silicate nanocom-posites: preparation, properties and uses of a new class ofmaterials. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2000; 28: 1–63.
3. Sinha Ray S, Okamoto M. Polymer/layered silicate nano-composites: a review from preparation to processing. Prog.Polym. Sci. 2003; 28: 1539–1641.
4. Ahmadi SJ, Huang YD, Li W. Synthetic routes, propertiesand future applications of polymer-layered silicate nano-composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2004; 39: 1919–1925.
5. Dennis HR, Hunter DL, Chang D, Kim S, White S, White JL,Cho JW, Paul DR. Effect of melt processing conditions on the
Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008; 19: 1576–1583
DOI: 10.1002/pat
Imidazolium-modified clay-based ABS nanocomposites 1583
extent of exfoliation in organoclay-based nanocomposites.Polymer 2001; 42: 9513–9522.
6. Yalcin B, CakmakM. The role of plasticizer on the exfoliationand dispersion and fracture behavior of clay particles in PVCmatrix: a comprehensivemorphological study. Polymer 2004;45: 6623–6638.
7. Xie W, Gao Z, Pan WP, Hunter D, Singh A, Vaia S. Thermaldegradation chemistry of alkyl quaternary ammoniummon-tmorillonite. Chem. Mater. 2001; 13: 2979–2990.
8. Hartwig A, Putz D, Schartel B, Bartholmai M, Wendschuh-Josties M. Combustion behaviour of epoxide based nano-composites with ammonium and phosphonium bentonites.Macrom. Chem. Phys. 2003; 204: 2247–2257.
9. Awad WH, Gilman JW, Nyden M, Harris RH Jr, Sutto TE,Callahan J, Trulove PC, DeLong HC, Fox DM. Thermaldegradation studies of alkyl-imidazolium salts and theirapplication in nanocomposites. Thermochim. Acta 2004;409: 3–11.
10. Pourabas B, Raeesi V. Preparation of ABS/montmorillonitenanocomposite using a solvent/non-solvent method. Poly-mer 2005; 46: 5533–5540.
11. Modesti M, Besco S, Lorenzetti A, Causin V, Marega C,Gilman JW, Fox DM, Trulove PC, DeLong HC, ZammaranoM. ABS/clay nanocomposites obtained by solution tech-nique: influence of clays’ organic modifiers. Pol. Deg. Stab.2007; 92: 2206–2213.
12. Maupin PH, Gilman JW, Harris RH Jr, Bellayer S, Bur AJ,Roth SC, Murariu M, Morgan AB, Harris JD. Optical probesfor monitoring intercalation and exfoliation in melt-processed polymer nanocomposites. Macromol. RapidCommun. 2004; 25: 788–792.
13. Gilman JW, Awad WH, Davis RD, Shields J, Kashiwagi T,VanderHart DL, Harris RH Jr, Davis C, Morgan AB, Sutto
Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
TE, Callahan J, Truelove PC, Delong HC. Polymer/layeredsilicate nanocomposites from thermally stable trialkylimi-dazolium-treated montmorillonite. Chem. Mater. 2002; 14:3776–3785.
14. Bottino FA, Fabbri E, Fragala LI, Malandrino G, Orestano A,Pilati F, Pollicino A. Polystyrene-clay nanocomposites pre-pared with polymerizable imidazolium surfactants. Macro-mol. Rapid Commun. 2003; 24: 1079–1084.
15. Vaia RA, Teukolsky RK, Giannelis EP. Interlayer structureand molecular environment of alkylammonium layeredsilicates. Chem. Mater. 1994; 6: 1017–1022.
16. Zhong-Zhen Y, Mingshu Y, Qingxin Z, Chungui Z,Yiu-Wing M. Dispersion and distribution of organicallymodified montmorillonite in nylon-66 matrix. J. Polym.Sci. Part B, Polym Phys. 2003; 41: 1234–1243.
17. Vaia RA, Liu W. X-ray powder diffraction of polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: model and practice.J. Polym. Sci. Part B, Polym Phys. 2002; 40: 1590–1600.
18. Baumann R, Ferrante C, Deeg FW, Brauchle C. Solvationdynamics of nile blue in ethanol confined in porous sol–gelglasses. J. Chem. Phys. 2001; 114: 5781–5791.
19. Stretz HA, Paul DR, Cassidy PE. poly(styrene-co-acryloni-trile)/montmorillonite organoclay mixtures: amodelsystem for ABS nanocomposites. Polymer 2005; 46: 3818–3830.
20. Shaofeng W, Yuan H, Lei S, Zhengzhou W, Zuyao C,Weicheng F. Preparation and thermal properties of ABS/montmorillonite nanocomposite. Pol. Deg. Stab. 2002; 77:423–426.
21. Zammarano M. Thermoset fire retardant nanocomposites.In Morgan A, Wilkie CA (eds), Flame Retardant PolymerNanocomposites, Morgan A, Wilkie CA (eds). John Wiley &Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey, 2007; 235–284.
Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008; 19: 1576–1583
DOI: 10.1002/pat