Imagining Evil: Witchcraft Beliefs and Accusations in Contemporary Africa by Gerrie terHaarReview by: Jean La FontaineAfrican Studies Review, Vol. 51, No. 1 (Apr., 2008), pp. 137-138Published by: African Studies AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27667298 .Accessed: 18/01/2012 14:56

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

African Studies Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to AfricanStudies Review.

http://www.jstor.org

Book Reviews 137

Gerrie ter Haar, ed. Imagining Evil: Witchcraft Beliefs and Accusations in Con

temporary Africa. Trenton N.J.: Africa World Press, 2007. Religion in Contemporary Africa series, vi + 348 pp. Tables. Figures. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $29.95. Paper.

In the course of her comprehensive introduction, Gerrie ter Haar empha

sizes that the majority of the contributors to the book are Africans. Her as

sertion that they know more of witchcraft since they have "lived experience"

of it is debatable. These African contributors are also teachers of religious studies and theology, and most of their contributions clearly reflect this.

The most valuable articles in this collection are based not on experience but on research using the methods of social science.

The bulk of the book consists of descriptions, varying in quality, of

witchcraft from various parts of Africa. It is startling that so few contributors

are concerned with the major changes witchcraft beliefs have undergone, even in the last decades; they write almost as if present-day beliefs were

merely survivals from the past. Stephen Nyoka Nyaga's account (Tanzania) stands out for its meticulous field research and its recognition of the in

terplay of past and present. He is also the only one to consider another

religion spreading in Africa, Islam, thus shedding some comparative light on the problem.

Stephen Ellis aims to describe the influence of stories of the European witch hunts on historians and anthropologists, but his chapter is hampered

by his incomplete knowledge of social anthropology and its contributions

to more recent historical understanding of the witch hunts. The editor's ar

ticle, "Ghanaian Witchcraft Beliefs: A View from the Netherlands," also dis

appoints, but for a different reason: it focuses on one pastor, his views and

career rather than on Ghanaian beliefs in the diaspora, as the title seems

to promise. Some suggestions for dealing with the problem represented

by witchcraft accusations (it is not beliefs in witchcraft but actions taken

against alleged witches that cause suffering,

a distinction that deserves

greater emphasis) are mooted. An interesting and rare instance in which

such ideas have actually been tried out, in Zambia, is described by Hugo Hinfelaar, a Catholic missionary. While few of these contributions consider

the extremes to which retribution against supposed witches has been taken

recently, they are concerned with solving problems,

a difference marking

this book out from others in the field.

The most interesting?and controversial?article is the last in the book,

in which Walter van Beek argues that anthropologists have been prevented

by their relativist stance from investigating or

understanding an

important

aspect of the subject of witchcraft. Intra- and intersociety variability in the

consequences to those accused of witchcraft has been described but not ex

plained. Understanding why violence does or does not ensue is essential if

its modern manifestations are to be halted, but the failure to analyze if, how,

and why a

suspicion may be transmuted into action and what sort of action

may result is also an analytical flaw. It prevents

not only the development

138 African Studies Review

of counteractive measures but also full understanding of the phenomenon.

His tilt at relativism will provoke debate, but his chapter does demonstrate

significant gaps in our knowledge. The second part of van Beek's article is devoted to demonstrating a

comparative method that recalls Mead or Benedict. "Six variables" which

"seem to form a logical chain... of

increasing witchcraft violence" (303) are used to compare seven cultures, including historical Europe. This focus

on the differences among societies rather than within them and on what

encourages violence rather than what inhibits it is less practically oriented than it might have been. But van Beek nonetheless suggests a new field for research and one that might provide

some solutions to the problems raised,

as well as analytical insights.

All in all, this is a mixed bag but not without interest for students of witchcraft in contemporary Africa.

Jean La Fontaine

London School of Economics

London, U.K.