Holographic Preheating: Quasi-Normal Modes and Holographic Renormalization

Yi-Fu Cai2∗, Shu Lin1†, Junyu Liu2,3‡, Jia-Rui Sun1§

1) School of Physics and Astronomy, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China2) CAS Key Laboratory for Researches in Galaxies and Cosmology, Department of Astronomy,

University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China and3) Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics,

California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States

In the holographic description of cosmic preheating proposed in an accompanied Letter [1], theenergy transfer between the inflaton and matter field at strong coupling is suggested to be mimickedby superfluid and normal components of a superconductor on Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW)boundary in an asymptotically Anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetime. In this paper we investigated twoaspects of the scenario of holographic preheating that are not included in the accompanied work.Firstly, we study in detail the evolution of the quasi-normal modes (QNMs) surrounding a metastablehairy black hole. This analysis can quantitatively describe the preheating process of the matter fieldthat is produced continuously in the case of strong coupling. Secondly, we present a detailed analysisof the holographic renormalization for the AdS-FRW background, which allows us to extract operatorexpectation values for studying cosmological implications.

PACS numbers: 98.80.Cq, 11.25.Tq, 04.50.Gh, 04.30.Nk

I. INTRODUCTION

Our universe is believed to have experienced a periodof inflationary phase in the very early times during whichits size was enlarged by a factor of about 1080. Duringinflation all unwanted primordial relics produced fromthe Big Bang can be washed out [2–6]. Within thiscosmological paradigm, primordial density fluctuationsof quantum origin can be causally generated and thencan provide the seeds for the formation of the large-scalestructure (LSS) and the Cosmic Microwave Background(CMB) anisotropies [7]. After inflation, it is importantto dynamically release the energy stored in the potentialof the inflaton field to produce other matter fields so thatthe universe can reach thermal equilibrium. This processis dubbed as the reheating phase.

The energy transfer from the inflaton field to regularmatter was initially studied using the perturbation the-ory at first order [8–10]. Such an analysis does not takeinto account the fact that the inflaton field at the endof inflation is in a highly homogeneous condensate staterather than an assembly of free perturbative quanta. Aswas pointed out in [11, 12], during the energy transferfrom the inflaton to matter field, which are usually mod-elled by two scalar fields, there exists a sizeable parameterspace that contains the parametric resonance instabilityeven if their coupling is weak. This instability was soonapplied to realize a phase of preheating in detail in [13–15], during which the energy transfer from the inflatonto matter fields becomes very dramatic. Similar results

∗yifucai@ustc.edu.cn†linshu8@mail.sysu.edu.cn‡jliu2@caltech.edu§sunjiarui@sysu.edu.cn

were found in alternative paradigms to inflation, such asin bounce cosmology [16]. For recent reviews of cosmicpreheating, we refer to [17–19].

The key aspect of the present paradigm of cosmic pre-heating at weak coupling is that the inflaton field oscil-lations after inflation can make a periodical contributionto the effective mass term of the matter field, which isoften described the well-known Floquet theory [20]. Asa result, this weakly coupled cosmic preheating, whencombined with observations, can be applied to constraincosmological parameters of the very early universe evenif the coupling between the inflaton and matter fieldis weak. Namely, the post-inflationary background pa-rameters were studied with a perturbative treatment inRefs. [21–30]; and the evolutions of primordial fluctua-tions during preheating were investigated in Refs. [31–37]. These works have shown that the study of cosmicpreheating can play an important role in placing con-straints on the cosmology of the very early universe, suchas inflationary models.

However, very few study was to address the cosmic pre-heating at strong couplings, which was expected to occurin some early universe models at extremely high energyscales, namely, see [38]. Study of cosmic preheating atstrong coupling enables us to gain more insights on moregeneric paradigm about this process. Recently, a newdescription of cosmic preheating at strong coupling wasproposed by virtue of the holographic superconductormodel in [1]. In this mechanism, the preheating processof the inflaton strongly coupled with a class of fermionicmatter field can be mimicked by superfluid and normalcomponents of a superconductor, which is holographi-cally described by a five dimensional metastable hairyblack hole in the Anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetime. In or-der to accommodate with an expanding universe, we takethe boundary of this background to be of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) form. This scenario is mani-

arX

iv:1

612.

0439

4v2

[he

p-th

] 1

9 D

ec 2

016

2

FIG. 1: Artistic illustration of the holographic preheatingparadigm. In this paradigm, the cosmic preheating in a 4DFRW universe is holographically described by the phase tran-sition in a 5D AdS-Schwarzschild black hole, which is confor-mally mapped to a AdS-FRW background. From [1]. (creditto Mr. Yulin Hu)

festly different from many other holographic models ofcosmology in which the universe is the bulk spacetime,and accordingly, there is a dual quantum field theory onthe boundary, as were widely studied in the literature[39–47]. The bulk spacetime adopted in [1] is then aAdS-FRW and can be mapped to the well-known AdS-Schwarzschild black hole [48] (see also [49–52]) via coor-dinate transformation. A similar picture addressing thereheating through holographic thermalization was stud-ied in [53]. We refer to Fig. 1 for artistic illustration ofholographic preheating in a 4D FRW universe.

One goal of the present paper is to study in detailthe evolution of the quasi-normal modes (QNMs) of ametastable hairy black hole. With this analysis, one isable to characterize the process of cosmic preheating atstrong coupling quantitatively. Among all QNMs, therealways exists one mode of which the imaginary part ofthe frequency becomes positive, and hence, can drive thecosmological background evolving from the metastablestate, which duals to the inflaton-dominant state on theboundary, to the stable state, which duals to the bound-ary state dominated by the matter field. This can be readby performing a coordinate transformation from the AdS-Schwarzschild geometry to the AdS-FRW one. Thus, thesecond goal of this paper is to provide a detailed analysisof the holographic renormalization within the AdS-FRWbackground. One can see that proper renormalization ofthe theory requires addition of a curvature term to theFRW boundary. By taking the derivatives of the renor-malized action with respect to the sources, one can obtainrelevant vacuum expectation values of the operators, oneof which represents for the evolution of the density of thematter field produced during preheating.

The rest parts of the paper are organized as follows. In

Section II we introduce the holographic superconductormodel with a flat boundary. The background geometry ofthis model is a meta-stable hairy black hole in the probelimit. Then in Section III, we proceed with the calcula-tion of QNM analysis under this background, which areconformally related to the unstable modes on the FRWboundary. Afterwards, we do the conformal transforma-tion in Section IV, and then, perform the holographicrenormalization within the AdS-FRW background. Sec-tion V is devoted to a conclusion of our analysis with adiscussion.

II. HOLOGRAPHIC MODEL OF COSMICPREHEATING

Our goal is to describe the dynamical evolution of thecosmic system in terms of an inflaton field and a sec-ond matter field at strong coupling. The initial state isdominated by the inflaton. The evolution diminishes theinflaton field and amplifies the matter field. The endmoment is expected to be a matter dominated phase.

Following the proposal of Ref. [1], we describe thescenario of cosmic preheating by adopting a holographicsuperconductor type model as follows [54–57]:

S =

∫d5x√−g[− 1

4FMNF

MN − 1

2∂MΨ∂MΨ− 1

2m2Ψ2

−Ψn (∂Mp−AM )(∂Mp−AM

) ], (1)

where we have introduced FMN ≡ ∂MAN−∂NAM , whichis the field strength of the U(1) gauge field in the bulkspacetime. In this action, a complex scalar Ψ is intro-duced as dual to the inflaton field, and, the U(1) gaugefield AM is introduced as dual to the fermionic matterfield. Accordingly, in this scenario, the inflaton field isassumed to be converted to fermionic fields only. Wenote that the building up of fermionic matter fields wouldeventually affect the expansion of the universe throughthe backreaction to the metric. We would like to exam-ine this issue by including the generation of cosmologicalfluctuations in a forthcoming work [58]. Moreover, themodel parameter m represents the mass of Ψ and n is aparameter in the coupling between the inflaton and thematter field, which is found to be related with the or-der of phase transition [1] (see also [54] for the analysesof phase transitions in case of holographic superconduc-tors).

The model is required to be embedded in the back-ground geometry with an FRW boundary, so that it canbe applied to describe the expanding universe such asours. In the probe limit, such a background with anFRW boundary can be obtained by performing a coordi-nate transformation on an AdS-Schwarzschild black hole[48]. With this process, one can significantly simplifythe calculation, since we can first study the dynamics ofΦ and AM in the AdS-Schwarzschild background, andthen, we can translate the results to the background of a

3

thermally expanding universe by performing a coordinatetransformation.

The aforementioned model is embedded in the (d+ 1)-dimensional planar AdS-Schwarzschild black hole back-ground,

ds2 = −f(r)dt2 +dr2

f(r)+r2

L2dx2

i , (2)

where the metric factor is given by f(r) = r2

L2 − Md−2

rd−2 ,and, i = 1, 2, . . . , d − 1. The vanishing condition of themetric factor yields the radius of the horizon to be

rH = M(d−2)

d L2d , (3)

and in the probe limit, the corresponding temperature isrelated with the horizon via

T =rHd

4πL2. (4)

We set the AdS radius L = 1 from now for simplicity.Note that the thermodynamics of the system is only a

function of the chemical potential (or equivalently den-sity) of matter field. In order to study thermodynamics,we turn on Ψ and At ≡ Φ, of which the dynamics can bederived by solving the background equations of motion.It is convenient to use the dimensionless radial coordinate

z =rHr, (5)

to express the equations of motion, of which the formsare given by

∂2Ψ

∂z2+

(1− d− zd)z(1− zd)

∂Ψ

∂z=

m2Ψ

z2(1− zd)− nΦ2Ψn−1

r2H(1− zd)2

,

∂2Φ

∂z2+

(3− d)

z

∂Φ

∂z=

2ΨnΦ

z2(1− zd). (6)

If one solve the above equations near the AdS boundarywith z = ε→ 0 (where ε is the cutoff which is related tothe ultra-violate cutoff of the dual field theory), Ψ andΦ can be expressed in the following asymptotic forms 1

Ψ = Ψ+ε∆+r

−∆+

H + Ψ−ε∆−r

−∆−H + · · · ,

Φ = µ− ρ

rd−2H

εd−2 + · · · , (7)

where

∆± =d±√d2 + 4m2

2. (8)

As was reported in [1], for the purpose of cosmic pre-heating in a realistic universe, the dimension parameter

1 We note that, for d = 4, the expansions contain additional loga-rithmic terms.

d is taken to be d = 4. Also one can choose m2 = −3(which satisfies the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound in theAdS5 spacetime) such that ∆+ = 3 and ∆− = 1. In thiscase, both Ψ+ and Ψ− are normalizable modes, whichcorrespond to the vev and the source of the inflaton field,respectively. Moreover, the value of Φ on the boundaryyields the chemical potential µ for the fermionic matterfield. Thus, one can learn from the study of holographicsuperconductors [54] that, a phase transition is present ata critical value for the chemical potential at µc for a giventemperature. The phase above µc is an AdS hairy blackhole with Ψ condensation, which is dual to inflaton dom-inated phase. The phase below µc is AdS-Schwarzschildblack hole with no Ψ condensation, thus is dual to thematter dominated phase with a vanishing vev of the in-flaton. The order of this phase transition depends on thevalue of n which appeared in the last term of the action(1), and in our case with n = 3, the phase transition isof first order. This implies that the inflaton dominatedphase extends to the region below µc, where the phasebecomes metastable.

In the following we will use such a metastable phase asthe initial state of cosmic preheating, which is thermody-namically unstable. As we will see from the analysis, suchan instability can drive the evolution of the backgroundsystem under consideration from the inflaton-dominantphase towards a phase dominated by the matter field.

III. QUASI-NORMAL MODES OF THEMETASTABLE STATE

In this section, we will focus on the properties of theQNMs generated during the initial stage of the back-ground evolution. The full analysis of the late time evolu-tion should also include the back-reactions, and we wouldlike to address this part in our forthcoming work [58].

Now we are ready to study the QNMs of the metastablephase. The procedure is standard [59, 60] (see also ex-amples for QNMs in metastable phase [61, 62]). First ofall, we turn on the following perturbations:

Ψ→ Ψ(r) + σ(t, x) , p→ η(r, t, x)

Ψ(r),

At → Φ(r) + at(r, t, x) , Ax → ax(r, t, x) . (9)

The first three modes, which are: σ, η and at, can com-pose of a minimum set for analyzing the dynamical sys-tem of the inflaton and matter field.

Here we have chosen the axial gauge: Ar = 0. It is alsopossible to eliminate p in favor of Ar. Without loss ofgenerality, we include the dependence on x1 ≡ x in orderto study the effect of spatial inhomogeneity, which re-quires that one to include Ax in the perturbation modes.It is straightforward to write down the background equa-

4

tions of motion as follows,

∂M (√−g∂MΨ)/

√−g = m2Ψ + 3Ψ2(∂Np−AN )(∂Np−AN ) ,

∂[√−gΨ3(∂Np−AN )] = 0 ,

∂M (√−gFMN )/

√−g = 2Ψ3(∂Np−AN ) , (10)

in order to derive the perturbation equations.Afterwards, we insert the perturbation modes intro-

duced in Eq. (9) into the above equations, and then,perform the Fourier transformation by taking the forme−iωt+ikx. As a result, we can obtain the perturbationequations list in the following,

ω2ηΨ2 − k2r−2fηΨ2 − 3iωσΦΨ2 − iωΨ3at

− ikr−2fΨ3ax + 3r−1f2Ψ2∂rη + fΨ2∂rf∂rη

− 3r−1f2ηΨ∂rΨ− fηΨ∂rf∂rΨ + f2Ψ∂rη∂rΨ

− f2η (∂rΨ)2

+ f2Ψ2∂2rη − f2ηΨ∂2

rΨ = 0 , (11)

ω2σ − k2r−2fσ −m2fσ + 6iωηΦΨ + 6σΦ2Ψ

+ 6ΦΨ2at + 3r−1f2∂rσ + f∂rf∂rσ + f2∂2rσ = 0 , (12)

2iωηΨ2 + 6σΦΨ2 − k2r−2at + 2Ψ3at − kr−2ωax

+ 3r−1f∂rat + f∂2rat = 0 , (13)

2ikrfηΨ2 − krωat − rω2ax − 2rfΨ3ax − f2∂2rax

− rf∂rf∂rax − rf2∂2rax = 0 , (14)

2fΨ2∂rη − 2fηΨ∂rΨ + iω∂rat + ikr−2f∂rax = 0 .(15)

It is convenient to rewrite the perturbation equationsin terms of the dimensionless coordinate z defined in Eq.(5). Then, to solve the dynamics of QNMs, we impose theingoing wave condition on the horizon z = 1. This leadsto the asymptotic solutions near the horizon as follows,

η = (1− z)−iω

4rH [η0 + η1(1− z) + · · · ] ,

σ = (1− z)−iω

4rH [σ0 + σ1(1− z) + · · · ] ,

at = (1− z)1− iω4rH [at0 + at1(1− z) + · · · ] ,

ax = (1− z)−iω

4rH [ax0 + ax1(1− z) + · · · ] . (16)

Note that, there are only three free parameters in (16).We can parameterize the solutions by η0, σ0 and ax0, withthe remaining parameters determined from Eq. (11), andthese three parameters can lead to three independent so-lutions. In the following, we label the corresponding so-lutions by the subscripts I, II and III, which are givenby:

ηI0 = 1 , σI0 = 0 , aIx0 = 0 ,

ηII0 = 0 , σII0 = 1 , aIIx0 = 0 ,

ηIII0 = 0 , σIII0 = 0 , aIIIx0 = 1 , (17)

respectively. Moreover, there remains a pure gauge solu-tion, which can be generated from the gauge transforma-tion on a trivial solution as follows,

ηIV = iλΨ , σIV = 0 , aIVt = ωλ , aIVx = −kλ , (18)

and has been labeled by the subscript IV .For a generic solution constructed from linear combi-

nation of the above four basis solutions, the asymptoticexpansions of the QNMs near the boundary then takethe forms to be

η = ηbz + · · · , σ = σbz3 + · · · ,

at = atb + · · · , ax = axb + · · · , (19)

The leading coefficients are dual to sources to the corre-sponding fields on the Minkowski boundary. The condi-tions of QNMs require that the modes live without ex-ternal sources, and thus, all leading coefficients shouldvanish. This can be formulated as the condition on theabove basis solutions as follows,∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣

ηIb ηIIb ηIIIb ηIVbσIb σIIb σIIIb σIVbaItb aIItb aIIItb aIVtbaIxb aIIxb aIIIxb aIVxb

∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣ = 0. (20)

Note that Eq. (20) is independent of the normaliza-tion of solutions, and hence, we can set λ = 1 in the puregauge solution (18). The condition allows us to determinethe QNMs for a fixed wave number k. The QNMs withthe positive imaginary part correspond to the existenceof an instability for the metastable state, which can beclearly read by inserting this imaginary part into the ex-ponent factor e−iωt+ikx. The real part of QNMs indicatethat there also exist oscillations during the amplificationof matter field.

The dependencies of QNMs on the wave number k andthe vev of the inflaton are numerically shown in Fig. 2.From the upper panel of Fig. 2, one can see that at thesmall k regime, the amplification of matter field is themost efficient, which corresponds to the most dramaticregime during the preheating process. This property isvery similar to the case of cosmic preheating at weakcoupling in which the exponential growth can be realizedwhen the coupling satisfies the requirement of parametricresonance, except that the growth in the strong couplingcase is steady continuous without additional requirementon the couplings. Moreover, at the large k regime, theoscillations become more and more important to describethe evolutions of these QNMs. According to the curvein the lower panel of the figure, we also learn that alarger value of the inflaton’s vev tends to trigger a fasterconversion to the matter field, with the imaginary partof the frequency being an approximately linear functionin the vev of the inflaton.

IV. HOLOGRAPHIC RENORMALIZATION INA ADS-FRW BACKGROUND

In the previous section we have investigated the QNMsof the metastable state in the AdS-Schwarzschild blackhole background. After that, we need to map our re-sults to the FRW-AdS background. Note that, The

5

0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 00 . 0

0 . 2

0 . 4

0 . 6

k / ( πT )

1 0 0 × R e [ ω/ ( πT ) ] I m [ ω/ ( πT ) ]

2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 40 . 4

0 . 5

0 . 6

0 . 7

Im[ω/

(πT)]

Ψ + / ( πT ) 3

FIG. 2: Upper: The real and imaginary parts of the frequencyof QNMs at T = 0.2 as functions of the wave number k for

a fixed inflaton’s vevΨ+

(πT )3= 19.5. We see that the most

unstable QNM (one with the largest imaginary part) occursat k = 0, where the real part vanishes. Lower: The imaginarypart of the most unstable mode as a function of dimensionless

vev of the inflatonΨ+

(πT )3with k = 0. Note that the phase

transition is of first order, so the order parameter Ψ+ doesnot extend to zero at the critical point.

FRW-AdS background can be obtained from the AdS-Schwarzschild black hole via a coordinate transforma-tion [48], and its application to holographic preheatinghas been performed in [1]. In this section, we presentthe holographic renormalization in the AdS-FRW back-ground to ensure that the cosmological implications de-rived in Ref. [1] are reliable.

By adopting the Fefferman-Graham coordinates, the5-dimensional AdS-FRW spacetime can be expressed as

ds2 =1

ξ2

[dξ2 −N (τ, ξ)2dτ2 +A(τ, ξ)2d~x2

]. (21)

with d~x2 ≡ dx21 + dx2

2 + dx23. Its boundary is located at

ξ → 0, which corresponds to a 4-dimensional FRW uni-verse with N → 1 and A → a. Here, a is the scale factorof the universe living on the boundary. The expressions

of N and A are give by,

A2 = a2 − a2

2ξ2 +

a4 + 4r4H

16a2ξ4 ,

N =Aa, (22)

where the dot represents derivative with respect to τ .The AdS-Schwarzschild metric and the AdS-FRW one

are related through a set of coordinate transformations,which maps (t, r) to (τ, ξ) through the following rela-tions,

r =Aξ, t = −Ar

′

fa, t′ = − a

ξf, (23)

and here, the prime denotes the derivative with respectto ξ. The explicit form of t(τ, ξ) can be obtained byperform an integral on (23). The coordinate transforma-tions reduce to the conformal transformation on the AdSboundary, and it relates the stress tensor in the FRWbackground to that in the Minkowski [48].

We have chosen m2 = −3 such that the indices of Ψtake values in (8). Then, we work in the axial gaugeAξ = 0. It follows from the equations of motion (10)that the asymptotic expansions of the fields are given by

Aτ = aτ0 + aτ1ξ + aτ2ξ2 + aτhξ

2 ln ξ + · · · ,Ax = ax0 + ax1ξ + ax2ξ

2 + axhξ2 ln ξ + · · · ,

Ψ = Ψ1ξ + Ψ2ξ2 + Ψ3ξ

3 + Ψhξ3 ln ξ + · · · ,

p = p0 + p1ξ + p2ξ2 + phξ

2 ln ξ + · · · . (24)

Note that, the coefficients in (24) are not all indepen-dent. Applying the equations of motion and the followingasymptotic expansions for N and A (see [48]):

N = 1 +a2 − 2aa

4a2ξ2 − 3r4

H

8a4ξ4 + · · · ,

A = a− a2

4aξ2 +

r4H

8a3ξ4 + · · · , (25)

we can determine aτ1 = 0, ax1 = 0 and Ψ2 = 0. Further-more, aτh, axh, Ψh and ph can be expressed in terms ofaτ0, ax0, Ψ1 and a. We will not show explicit expressionshere. The undetermined coefficients will need further in-formation from the bulk.

Afterwards, we wish to show that these coefficients giverise to the vev of the corresponding operators. We pro-ceed by calculating the on-shell action as shown below

S =

∫∂

−1

2

√−gF ξNAN +

∫1

2∂M

(√−gFMN

)AN

+

∫∂

−1

2

√−g∂ξΨΨ +

∫1

2∂M

(√−g∂Mψ

)Ψ

−∫m2

2

√−gΨ2 −

∫∂

√−gΨ3∂ξp · p

+

∫∂M

(√−gΨ3

(∂Mp−AM

))p

+

∫Ψ3√−gAM

(∂Mp−AM

). (26)

6

Here we has used the short hand notations:∫

=∫d5x,∫

∂=∫d4x, and keep the boundary terms only on the

AdS boundary. By using the background equations ofmotion again, we find the on-shell action as

Sos =

∫∂

−1

2

√−g(F ξNAN + ∂ξΨΨ−Ψ3∂ξp · p

)+

∫3

2Ψ3√−g

(∂Mp−AM

)(∂Mp−AM

). (27)

We note that last term is a bulk term. It is known thatthis term could lead to the finite scheme-dependent con-tribution to the on-shell action [63]. We will drop thebulk term in the following.

The on-shell action contains the divergences in theform of

Sos = −a3Ψ2

1

2ξ2+ (· · ·) ln ξ + finite terms. (28)

We could add to it the following counter terms

SΨ2 =

∫∂

1

2

√−γΨ2 ,

SDΨ2 =

∫∂

1

2

√−γ (DΨ)

2,

Sf2 =

∫−1

4

√−γf2 , (29)

where we have used γ to denote the induced metric ona cutoff surface close to the AdS boundary and D is thecovariant derivative compatible with γ. f is the inducedfield strength on the cutoff surface. We find that the 1

ξ2

term can be canceled by the contribution of SΨ2 , and theln ξ divergence can be partially canceled by the termsSDΨ2 and Sf2 . We note that the regular forms for SDΨ2

and Sf2 provided below are not enough to cancel all di-vergences

Sf2 =a

2

[2(∂xaτ0)(∂τax0)− (∂xaτ0)2 − (∂τax0)2

]+O(ξ) ,

SDΨ2 =a

2

[(∂xΨ1)2 − a2(∂τΨ1)2

]+O(ξ) . (30)

This is because that there remains one extra contributionnot yet taken into account in the above study, whichis the boundary term due to the curvature of an FRWmetric as shown below,

SR =1

24

∫∂

√−γRγ . (31)

In order to further simplify the on-shell action, we alsoadd finite counter terms 1

2SDΨ2 and 12Sf2 . The inclusion

of these terms corresponds to a specific choice for thescheme. To combine all the above terms together, wefinally obtain the renormalized on-shell effective actionas follows,

Sren =

∫∂

[− aax0ax2 + a3aτ0aτ2 − a3Ψ1Ψ3

+ p0(3a2aaτ2 − a∂xax2 + a3∂τaτ2)]. (32)

Taking derivative with respect to source terms, we even-tually obtain the corresponding vev for all relevant fields,which are given by,

jτ = limξ→0− δSren√−γδaτ0

= aτ2 ,

jx = limξ→0− δSren√−γδax0

=ax2

a2,

O = limξ→0− δSren√−γδΨ1

= Ψ3 . (33)

Interestingly we note that, the first term in (33) ex-actly describes the growth of the matter field density inthe FRW universe during holographic preheating. Its re-sult has already been reported in the end of [1]. Thesecond term in (33) is associated with the inhomogeneityof the produced matter field, which is of interest for cos-mological perturbations, but we would like to leave it forfuture study [58]. The third term in (33) describes theevolution of the inflaton field, which in our case exhibitsa damping effect.

V. CONCLUSION

Holographic preheating is a newly proposed scenariothat addressed the energy transfer from the primordialinflaton field to other matter fields in the situation ofstrong coupling. This could be in analogy with some par-ticle physics phenomenon, such as, heavy ion collisions[64], which may also occur in the early universe whenthe universe reaches thermal equilibrium [65, 66]. It hasbeen found in [1] that, such a process may be mimickedby a model of holographic superconductor with interact-ing superfluid and normal components.

In this paper, we have studied two aspects of the holo-graphic preheating paradigm, which are the QNM anal-ysis of a metastable hairy black hole and the holographicrenormalization in AdS-FRW background, respectively.For the first part of the study, the QNMs surround-ing the hairy AdS-Schwarzschild black hole are relatedto dynamics on the boundary, which correspond to theexponential matter creations in Minkowski space. Byanalyzing the QNMs, we can learn the detailed processof cosmic preheating at strong coupling quantitatively.Among all QNMs, there always exists one mode of whichthe imaginary part of the frequency becomes positive andhence drive the background to evolve from the metastablephase, which is dual to the boundary state dominated bythe inflaton, to the stable phase, which is dual to theboundary state dominated by the matter.

In order to grasp the cosmological information cor-rectly, one needs to map the results in Minkowski spaceto the counterpart in FRW space by conformal transfor-mation. This can be done by a coordinate transformationfrom the AdS-Schwarzschild geometry to the AdS-FRWone. To translate the results in AdS-FRW to the cos-mic system, we need a holographic renormalization pro-

7

cedure. Thus, the second goal of the present paper is toprovide a detailed analysis of the holographic renormal-ization within the AdS-FRW background. One can seefrom the calculation that, the consistency condition re-quires addition of a curvature term into the FRW bound-ary that consists the effective field description of our uni-verse during the holographic preheating. Moreover, bytaking the derivatives of the renormalized effective actionwith respect to the sources, one can obtain the relevantvacuum expectation values of the operators, two of whichrepresent for the growth of the matter field density andthe damping of the inflaton field during preheating.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Robert Brandenberger, Sean Car-roll, Hong Lu, Antonino Marciano, Rong-Xin Miao, Wen-Yu Wen and Yi Yang for valuable scientific communica-tions, while Yulin Hu and Rui Niu for valuable artis-tic communications on the figure. S.L. thanks the Uni-

versity of Science and Technology of China (USTC) forproviding a stimulating environment during the EastAsia Joint Workshop on Fields and Strings and 2016CfA@USTC Junior Symposium on Gravitation and Cos-mology. J.L. thanks the hospitality from Sun Yat-SenUniversity (SYSU) during his visit in the summer of 2016.Y.F.C. is supported in part by the Chinese NationalYouth Thousand Talents Program (No. KJ2030220006),by the USTC start-up (No. KY2030000049) and byNSFC (Nos. 11421303, 11653002). S.L. is supported inpart by the Chinese National Youth Thousand TalentsProgram and by the SYSU Junior Faculty Fund. J.L. issupported in part by the physics department at Caltechand by the Fund for Fostering Talents in Basic Scienceof NSFC (No. J1310021). J.R.S. is supported in partby NSFC (No. 11205058), the Fundamental ResearchFunds for Central Universities and by the Open ProjectProgram of State Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physicsat CAS (No. Y5KF161CJ1). Part of numerical simula-tions are operated on the computer cluster LINDA in theparticle cosmology group at USTC.

[1] Y. F. Cai, S. Lin, J. Liu and J. R. Sun, arXiv:1612.04377[hep-th].

[2] A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981).[3] R. Brout, F. Englert and E. Gunzig, Annals Phys. 115,

78 (1978).[4] A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. 91B, 99 (1980).[5] K. Sato, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 195, 467 (1981).[6] L. Z. Fang, Phys. Lett. 95B, 154 (1980).[7] V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman and R. H. Branden-

berger, Phys. Rept. 215, 203 (1992).[8] L. F. Abbott, E. Farhi and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. 117B,

29 (1982).[9] A. D. Dolgov and A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. 116B, 329

(1982).[10] A. Albrecht, P. J. Steinhardt, M. S. Turner and

F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1437 (1982).[11] A. D. Dolgov and D. P. Kirilova, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51,

172 (1990).[12] J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D

42, 2491 (1990).[13] L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys.

Rev. Lett. 73, 3195 (1994) [hep-th/9405187].[14] Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger,

Phys. Rev. D 51, 5438 (1995) [hep-ph/9407247].[15] L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys.

Rev. D 56, 3258 (1997) [hep-ph/9704452].[16] Y. F. Cai, R. Brandenberger and X. Zhang, Phys. Lett.

B 703, 25 (2011) [arXiv:1105.4286 [hep-th]].[17] B. A. Bassett, S. Tsujikawa and D. Wands, Rev. Mod.

Phys. 78, 537 (2006) [astro-ph/0507632].[18] R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F. Y. Cyr-Racine and

A. Mazumdar, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 27 (2010)[arXiv:1001.2600 [hep-th]].

[19] M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser andJ. Karouby, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1530003 (2014)[arXiv:1410.3808 [hep-ph]].

[20] N. McLachlan, “Theory and Applications of MathieuFunctions” (Oxford Univ. Press, Clarendon, 1947).

[21] D. I. Podolsky, G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and M. Peloso,Phys. Rev. D 73, 023501 (2006) [hep-ph/0507096].

[22] J. Martin and C. Ringeval, Phys. Rev. D 82, 023511(2010) [arXiv:1004.5525 [astro-ph.CO]].

[23] P. Adshead, R. Easther, J. Pritchard and A. Loeb, JCAP1102, 021 (2011) [arXiv:1007.3748 [astro-ph.CO]].

[24] J. Mielczarek, Phys. Rev. D 83, 023502 (2011)[arXiv:1009.2359 [astro-ph.CO]].

[25] R. Easther and H. V. Peiris, Phys. Rev. D 85, 103533(2012) [arXiv:1112.0326 [astro-ph.CO]].

[26] L. Dai, M. Kamionkowski and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 041302 (2014) [arXiv:1404.6704 [astro-ph.CO]].

[27] J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin, Phys. Rev.Lett. 114, no. 8, 081303 (2015) [arXiv:1410.7958 [astro-ph.CO]].

[28] J. L. Cook, E. Dimastrogiovanni, D. A. Easson andL. M. Krauss, JCAP 1504, 047 (2015) [arXiv:1502.04673[astro-ph.CO]].

[29] J. B. Munoz and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D 91,no. 4, 043521 (2015) [arXiv:1412.0656 [astro-ph.CO]].

[30] R. G. Cai, Z. K. Guo and S. J. Wang, Phys. Rev.D 92, 063506 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.063506[arXiv:1501.07743 [gr-qc]].

[31] F. Finelli and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D 62,083502 (2000) [hep-ph/0003172].

[32] B. A. Bassett and F. Viniegra, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043507(2000) [hep-ph/9909353].

[33] R. H. Brandenberger, A. R. Frey and L. C. Lorenz, Int. J.Mod. Phys. A 24, 4327 (2009) [arXiv:0712.2178 [hep-th]].

[34] R. H. Brandenberger, K. Dasgupta and A. C. Davis,Phys. Rev. D 78, 083502 (2008) [arXiv:0801.3674 [hep-th]].

[35] H. Bazrafshan Moghaddam, R. H. Brandenberger,Y. F. Cai and E. G. M. Ferreira, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24,

8

no. 11, 1550082 (2015) [arXiv:1409.1784 [astro-ph.CO]].[36] J. O. Gong, S. Pi and G. Leung, JCAP 1505, no. 05, 027

(2015) [arXiv:1501.03604 [hep-ph]].[37] E. McDonough, H. Bazrafshan Moghaddam and

R. H. Brandenberger, JCAP 1605, no. 05, 012 (2016)[arXiv:1601.07749 [hep-th]].

[38] J. Garcia-Bellido, Phys. Lett. B 418, 252 (1998) [hep-th/9707059].

[39] C. S. Chu and P. M. Ho, JHEP 0604, 013 (2006) [hep-th/0602054].

[40] S. R. Das, J. Michelson, K. Narayan and S. P. Trivedi,Phys. Rev. D 74, 026002 (2006) [hep-th/0602107].

[41] S. R. Das, J. Michelson, K. Narayan and S. P. Trivedi,Phys. Rev. D 75, 026002 (2007) [hep-th/0610053].

[42] A. Awad, S. R. Das, A. Ghosh, J. H. Oh and S. P. Trivedi,Phys. Rev. D 80, 126011 (2009) [arXiv:0906.3275 [hep-th]].

[43] T. Hertog and G. T. Horowitz, JHEP 0504, 005 (2005)[hep-th/0503071].

[44] B. Craps, T. Hertog and N. Turok, Phys. Rev. D 86,043513 (2012) [arXiv:0712.4180 [hep-th]].

[45] P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Phys. Rev. D 81, 021301(2010) [arXiv:0907.5542 [hep-th]].

[46] R. H. Brandenberger, E. G. M. Ferreira, I. A. Morrison,Y. F. Cai, S. R. Das and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 94, no.8, 083508 (2016) [arXiv:1601.00231 [hep-th]].

[47] E. G. M. Ferreira and R. Brandenberger, JCAP 1607,no. 07, 030 (2016) [arXiv:1602.08152 [hep-th]].

[48] P. S. Apostolopoulos, G. Siopsis and N. Tetradis, Phys.Rev. Lett. 102, 151301 (2009) [arXiv:0809.3505 [hep-th]].

[49] N. Lamprou, S. Nonis and N. Tetradis, Class. Quant.Grav. 29, 025002 (2012) [arXiv:1106.1533 [gr-qc]].

[50] N. Tetradis, JHEP 1003, 040 (2010) [arXiv:0905.2763[hep-th]].

[51] S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and S. Ogushi, Int. J. Mod.Phys. A 17, 4809 (2002) [hep-th/0205187].

[52] G. Camilo, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, no. 12, 682 (2016)[arXiv:1609.07116 [hep-th]].

[53] S. Kawai and Y. Nakayama, Phys. Lett. B 759, 546(2016) [arXiv:1509.04661 [hep-th]].

[54] S. Franco, A. Garcia-Garcia and D. Rodriguez-Gomez,JHEP 1004, 092 (2010) [arXiv:0906.1214 [hep-th]].

[55] S. S. Gubser, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065034 (2008)[arXiv:0801.2977 [hep-th]].

[56] S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog and G. T. Horowitz, JHEP0812, 015 (2008) [arXiv:0810.1563 [hep-th]].

[57] S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog and G. T. Horowitz, Phys.Rev. Lett. 101, 031601 (2008) [arXiv:0803.3295 [hep-th]].

[58] Y.-F. Cai, S. Lin, and J. Sun, “Evolution of fluctuationsduring holographic preheating,” in preparation.

[59] I. Amado, M. Kaminski and K. Landsteiner, JHEP 0905,021 (2009) [arXiv:0903.2209 [hep-th]].

[60] P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. D 72,086009 (2005) [hep-th/0506184].

[61] U. Gursoy, S. Lin and E. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. D 88, no.10, 105021 (2013) [arXiv:1309.0789 [hep-th]].

[62] R. A. Janik, J. Jankowski and H. Soltanpanahi, JHEP1606, 047 (2016) [arXiv:1603.05950 [hep-th]].

[63] A. Karch, A. O’Bannon and K. Skenderis, JHEP 0604,015 (2006) [hep-th/0512125].

[64] J. Berges, Nucl. Phys. A 820, 65C (2009)[arXiv:0811.4401 [hep-ph]].

[65] R. Micha and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043538(2004) [hep-ph/0403101].

[66] R. Micha and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 121301(2003) [hep-ph/0210202].