ihe / rsna image sharing project - ihe colombia workshop (12/2014) module 5b

44
IHE: INTEROPERABILITY AT WORK THE USA PILOT RADIOLOGY NATIONAL IMAGE - SHARING PROGRAM Based on presentation at the Radiological Society of North America Annual meeting in Chicago, December 2013 Written by: David S. Mendelson, M.D. Professor of Radiology The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Senior Associate - Clinical Informatics The Mount Sinai Medical Center Co-chair IHE International Board Adapted and presented for the IHE Colombia IHE Workshop by: Elliot B. Sloane, PhD, CCE, FHIMSS Co-chair IHE International Board President, Center for Healthcare Information Research and Policy (CHIRP)

Upload: ihe-brasil

Post on 18-Jul-2015

140 views

Category:

Healthcare


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

IHE: INTEROPERABILITY AT WORK THE USA PILOT RADIOLOGY

NATIONAL IMAGE-SHARING PROGRAM

Based on presentation at the Radiological Society of North America Annual meeting in Chicago, December 2013

Written by: David S. Mendelson, M.D.

Professor of Radiology

The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Senior Associate - Clinical Informatics

The Mount Sinai Medical Center

Co-chair IHE International Board

Adapted and presented for the IHE Colombia IHE Workshop by:

Elliot B. Sloane, PhD, CCE, FHIMSS

Co-chair IHE International Board

President, Center for Healthcare Information Research and Policy

(CHIRP)

Image sharing- Why?

Benefit of historical exam during interpretation

Rapidly growing cost of healthcare especially growing utilization of imaging

Overutilization- Inappropriate Utilization

Prevent duplicate exam because a recent exam is inaccessible

Radiation exposure- reduction

Quality

Expedites clinical care through easy availability of imaging examination

Sharing Healthcare Information in the Cloud

Hospital

Imaging Center

Primary Doctor

Consultant

PatientPatient

Surrogate

2nd

Radiologist

2nd

Hospital

Clinical Trial

Challenges to exchange

Who pays for an exchange infrastructure

What is the persistence of the information in the exchange

Are images different from other forms of healthcare data

Easy secure access is good for the patient Does it endanger the provider?- is this an impediment?

Economic adjustments and evolution are likely to occur Balance of cost control vs. Quality

Reduction in Radiation exposure

Not all patients agree

Development - IHE Domains

• Anatomic Pathology

• Cardiology

• Dental

• Eye Care

• IT Infrastructure (ITI)

• Laboratory

• Patient Care Coordination

• Patient Care Devices

• Pharmacy

• Quality, Research and Public Health

• Radiation Oncology

• Radiology• Mammography

www.ihe.net

Ihe.wiki.net

ITI Profiles

XDS, XDS- I Cross Enterprise Document Sharing

XCA, XCA-I Cross Community Access

XDR, XDR-I Cross-Enterprise Document Reliable Interchange Document sharing in the absence of a registry and repository

XDM Cross-enterprise Document Media Interchange

XUA Cross Enterprise User Assertion Integration Profile

XDS-SD Cross-Enterprise Sharing of Scanned Documents

BPPC Basic Patient Privacy Consents

ATNA Audit Trail and Node Authentication

ITI- Trial implementation

Cross-Community Fetch (XCF) - Published 2011-08-19

Cross-Community Patient Discovery (XCPD) -Revised 2012-08-31

Cross-Enterprise Document Workflow (XDW) - Revised 2013-09-20

Interoperability Profiles-Radiology specific

PDI Portable Documents for Imaging IRWF Import Reconciliation Workflow TCE Teaching File and Clinical Trial Export

Trial Implementation IOCM Imaging Object Change Management MIMA Multiple Image Manager/Archive IID Invoke Image Display

Development Mobile Access to Health Documents - Imaging

IHE-XDS(Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing)

XDS-I.b

XCA-I

Importing an Exam

Establish a standard viewing environment for clinicians for outside exams.

Allow them to designate exams for import from this environment

Import into local PACS

IHE solutions [PDI] Portable Data for Imaging provides reliable interchange of

image data and diagnostic reports on CDs for importing, printing, or optionally, displaying in a browser.

[IRWF] Import Reconciliation Workflow manages importing images from CDs, hardcopy, etc. and reconciling identifiers to match local values.

A Standards Based Solution

NIBIB/RSNA Image Sharing Project

2009-2012

2012-2016

Image Share: Rationale

Medical imaging is a high-value, high-cost, rapidly expanding medical service

Current method of sharing via CDs is beset with inefficiencies and frustration

Studies show significant rates of redundant imaging procedures due to inaccessible priors

Patient empowerment is a key goal of current federal initiatives

16

NIBIB/RSNA Image Sharing Project

Consumer controls the flow of information –Patient Engagement Diminishes the need for BAAs

between enterprises Imaging Site to Clearinghouse Clearinghouse to PHR

Bootstrap an IHE based network IHE generally has not focused on

consumer driven solutions but rather on institutional and enterprise workflow

Primary emphasis is Consumer Control through PHRs

Can be extended to other forms of sharing HIE

Security and Confidentiality are drivers

Replacement / Alternative to CD

5 Academic Institutions

Develop a solution for all Radiology Sites

Establish a clearinghouse

Engage PHRs

A Standards Based Solution

Participants

18

Industry Participants

Clearinghouse

EdgeServer- in progress

lifeIMAGE

Dell

DICOMGRID

eHealthTechnologies

19

• PHRs

itMD

Image Sharing/Elements of Solution

Edge Server Register a patient Listens to a Radiology Information System (RIS)- looking for a complete

exam Retrieves Image set from PACS and Report from RIS Send both to clearinghouse

PHI hidden; an RSNA ID and 2nd factor security token are used to identify the patient

Clearinghouse (XDS-I) – functions as a secure router Transiently hold encrypted patient data

PHR Consumer controls upload and future access

Must have RSNA ID available and know answer to 2nd factor question

Develop web based viewers Download full DICOM data set

Misc Consumers

Image Sharing Systems Overview

22

Radiology Dept

Image Enabled PHR- DELL

Report

Patient PHR view

Patient and Dr. PHR view

Patient account permits sharing

Advantages of Approach

Push model No Query of PACS from outside the firewall

Full DICOM data set is available Web viewers Download and Import to PACS

Report is available Historical exams can be sent simultaneously Consumer controls flow of information

Affords the patient the ability to select what information to share Is this good?

RSNA Image Share- Current State 4 Academic sites are live

Mount Sinai, UCSF, University of Maryland, Mayo Clinic

Last sites are navigating local issues and hope to be live within a few months

3 Community practices are live- Oct 2013

Active discussions with approximately 15 additional sites An additional 15-20 under preliminary discussion

Version 2.1; version 3.0 just released

RSNA Image Share- Initial Patient experience Patients enrolled in production environment-

6400

Nov 23, 2013

Approximately 30% have closed the loop and used the PHR

Patient Responses

Love it!

Its about time

This is great

My doctor was really pleased to have access to my images

Problems

Couldn’t access my images

Got my images- but difficult

My doctor couldn’t see my images

Edge Server Release 3.0

New Features in Edge Server 3.0 (compared to prior version 2.1)

Site-to-site Transfer of Images for Clinical Use - Previous versions of the Edge Server support transfer of image studies only from the originating site to the Clearinghouse for retrieval into a patient’s PHR. Edge Server 3.0 adds support for retrieval of the Clearinghouse, enabling site-to-site transfer of images for clinical care.

Clinical Trials Support - Edge Server 3.0 enables anonymization of research imaging data set at field centers, which are then sent to the Clearinghouse for retrieval by a primary investigation site.

Edge Server 3.0 incorporates a unified GUI appearance for all three functional modules: system administration, clinical administration, and research administration.

Edge Server Release 3.1

More flexible sending function to address a broader range of clinical use cases

Release 3.1 adds options for sending patient information- flexible send time: Normally, after the radiologist report is final, with a delay for communication with the patient

that is configurable and set to 72 hours by default Urgently, as soon as the report is final Immediately, without waiting for the radiologist's report

Improved user convenience for patients Enables the use of patient email in place of system-generated security token Enables the reuse of a submission set ID for subsequent records of the same patient Sets password requirements at a minimum of eight characters, allowing any combination of

letters and symbols

Improved user convenience and system reliability for site personnel and administrators Provides automated resending of failed submissions Provides the option to include canceled exams in patient search results for troubleshooting

and exception resolution

Next steps - New NIBIB (NIH) contract New Funding awarded by NIH for 2 years + 2 option

years Expansion of network

Vendor Adoption of Edge Server (Open Source) Vendor migration to XDS for all services New use cases

Leverage XDS infrastructure/ network PHR HIE XDR

Edge Server as a platform QA, Comparative Effectiveness, CDS…..

Office of Civil Rights (OCR) HIPAA discussion about Privacy and Security -8/21/13

General Flow of Information is correctly implemented

OCR uggested the Clearinghouse vendor disclose dual role to patients

Validated use of email as a logon ID

Next steps and Future Direction - New NIBIB (NIH) contract

DICOM evolution Restful services Separation of Metadata from pixel data

Enables discovery Viewer

Refine Workflow Initial workflow is to replace a CD Exam updates Download DICOM data and archive in a local PACS EHR Integration

Edge server as a platform Radiation Monitoring Peer Review Quality Metrics