WYIMG 29 Jan 2012

IG Toolkit Update for LCIOC/ADASSDylan Roberts / Terry Dafter

Local Public Services CIO Council

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED1 IGToolkit Project update Session objectives What and Who - What is happening and who is involved

Why - Explain the wider context and overlap

How Overview of the approach we are taking and latest progress

When and Where Next

2IGToolkit - Project OverviewCreate the right environment to converge and coalesce IG/IA of both Health and Local Government.Deliver this convergence in a sensible and pragmatic wayDeliver in phases. Phase one is focused on the here and now.NHS IG Statement of ComplianceIG Toolkit (Social Care delivery).Deliver a technical (infrastructure) solution for Health organisations as well as local authorities to use the Public Service Network (PSN).Future phases are planned across governmentThe project has national support and from a wide range of stakeholders

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED3IGToolkit - StakeholdersThe Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS)The Cabinet OfficeDepartment of HealthNHS EnglandHealth and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC)Local Chief Information Officers Council (LCIOC)

Actively supported with help and contributions fromThe PSN Programme,a wide range of local authorities groupings including the Association of Greater Manchester AuthoritiesThe West Midlands IG Forum, Yorkshire and Humber equivalent A watching brief from the ICO.

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED4A variety of drivers and other imperativesLegislation and pending legislation (Health and Social Care Act 2012, The Care Bill)Caldicott 2 RecommendationsPioneer Projects (x14): Support for development of key building blocks for Integrated Health and Social Care programmes Child Protection (Information Sharing project)To support a raft of other local initiatives as well as national strategies requiring this approach.Need for a better way to support interoperability and service integration (people, place and process levels)Combined challenges we face (austerity situation, rising demand for services, ageing population)

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED5How - Progress summary Rewrite of the IGT Social Care Delivery viewA single corporate view rather than Adult Social Care service or Public Health perspectiveRemoves some of the confusion.(some LAs have completed the Hosted Secondary Use Team Project view previously but only for Public Health). Subject to final sign-off but:-instead of LAs being subject to completing 40 requirements the number has been reduced significantly and equivalence accepted (see separate slide deck) .

Fundamental Message - Give and Take approach by all parties

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED6District CouncilsSome District Councils are now engaging with HealthFitness Services to GPsCo-location and premises sharing

Recognise DifferencesNo Caldicott GuardianAlready have PSN IA Certificate

Encouraged to look at the IG ToolkitSimplifies requirements butFurther work is ongoing to provide better fit.

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED7When and Where next New local authority view (version 12) available mid to late June 2014Detailed guidance now being createdCommitment to making this an iterative and on-going process.Open Door approach -Trust Embedded Willingness to tackle the harder considerations moving forwardTechnical project launched utilising Y+H PSN to provide an infrastructure solution Business case created (alternative approach to N3 replacement)Lobbying on-going to establish the funding stream We cannot wait 3 years for a technical solution and final IG position

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED8The AdvantagesFunctional ImprovementsSimpler to Use One compliance not manyReflects corporate rather than departmental responsibilityStrategic AdvantagesCombination with PSN IA allows Local Authority to meet NHS IA/IG requirements now.Allows use of PSN infrastructure rather than N3Prepares org for future changes in assuranceAllows for rapid developments in integration and colocation etc.Allows for sharing of expertise, experience and resourceTactical AdvantagesSupports rapid adoptionStreamlines current internal processesAvoids risks and costs of developing tactical solutions

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED9The Disadvantages of not adopting this approachJeopardises the advantages givenIncreases costs and effort of complianceMay lead to use of N3 solutions which will be retired in 2-3 yearsReduced view may prevent true integration and joint working

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED10Where NextA proposed single IG framework for governmentbeginning with local authority and the Health sectorbased on legal basis for information exchange Defined top-ups rather than compliance with a whole regime forced by one sector upon another.Phase one Identifying and working through the complex dependencies and timing issuesNHS Number Programme

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED11A Single Assurance Framework

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED12The ProposalsHSCIC Working GroupCreate a Project TeamCreate Terms of ReferenceCreate a pro forma of new modelBaseline RequirementsHealth and Local Authority Top UpsAgree process for amendment (v1.1, 1.2 etc.)By September 2014Develop V1.0 of a converged compliance by September 2014Agree communications plan Agree implementation arrangements for 04/15

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED13Stakeholder EngagementNational Informatics Board (10/06/14)To be briefed by Linda Whalley - HSCICSupport from Tim Donohoe -DoHOffice of the Govt. SIRO (20/05/14)To be briefed by Mark Pope - PSNPSAAB/IRABTo be briefed by Mark PopeLCIOC (22/05/14)To be briefed by Dylan RobertsADASS Terry Dafter

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED14

Questions .

Should be directed to Ralph McNallyralph.mcnally@leeds.gcsx.gov.uk

File classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED15