ifta/irp joint session encouraging cooperation between irp and ifta processes joy prenger, missouri...
TRANSCRIPT
IFTA/IRP Joint Session Encouraging Cooperation Between IRP
and IFTA Processes
Joy Prenger, Missouri
Mary Jo Pointer, Missouri
Introduction
As administrators, we are constantly looking for ways to save time, energy, and resources
One means of doing this is to foster greater cooperation between IFTA and IRP processes, which are similar in nature including other motor carrier programs.
Missouri
Executive Order – March 19,2001– Develop a common registration process among
the four state agencies– Provide an Internet registration application to be
accessible through the common process developed by the agencies
– Develop a plan toward the ultimate consolidation of the state agencies
– Develop a single motor carrier services office in Jefferson City
Missouri
July 11, 2002• Missouri Highway Reciprocity Commission• Division of Motor Carrier and Railroad Safety• Overdimension and Overweight Permit Section• Hazardous Waste Transporter and Waste Tire
Programto
Missouri Department of Transportation – Motor Carrier Services Division
Statutory Authority
Missouri RSMo 226.008 – August 28,2003
Highway and Transportation Commission shall have
responsibility over:– Licensing, supervising and regulating motor carriers
Transportation of passengers, household goods, housemovers and other property
Transporting hazardous waste and permitting waste tire haulers
Compliance by motor carriers with applicable requirements relating to safety
– Safety Audits, Compliance Reviews, New Entrant, Educational Contacts
Statutory Authority cont.
– International Registration Plan– International Fuel Tax Agreement– Permitting of Overdimension/overweight vehicles
Further:– Transferred employees
Highway Reciprocity Division of Motor Carrier and Railroad Safety
Memorandom of Understanding
Department of Revenue– IRP and IFTA audits
DOR conducts required compliance audits as mandated DOR has access to HRC mainframe
– General Registration System access
Department of Economic Development– Mainframe support– Assistance in data conversion to new system
Department of Natural Resources– Hazardous Waste Transporter License– Waste Tire Transporter License
Fees collected transmitted to DNR
Motor Carrier Services Organizational Chart
B a rba ra H ag ueS p e c ia l P ro je c ts C o o rd in a to r
T ra nsp orta tio n E n fo rce m e n t In ves tiga to r22
S e n io r T ra n sp o rta t io n E n fo rcem e nt In ve s tiga to r13
T ra nsp o rta tion E n fo rcem e nt In ve s tiga tion s S u p e rv iso r8
S e n io r M o to r Ca rrie r S p e c ia list2
T ra n sp o rta tio n P rog ra m M a na g er3
B e n G oo d inE n fo rce m e n t A d m in ista to r
P e rm it A g e n t5
In te rm ed ia te P e rm it A ge n t21
S e n io r P erm it A g e n t3
M o to r C a rrie r C o m p lian ce S up e rv iso r3
M a ry Jo P o in terM o to r C a rrie r M a n a g er
M o to r C a rrie r S erv ice s A ss is ta n t5
S e n io r M o to r C arrie r S erv ice s A ss is ta n t3
M o to r C a rrie r A cco un t T e ch n ic ian3
In te rm e d ia te R e so u rce M an a ge m en t A n a lys t - 1T ra n sp o rta tio n C o m p lia nce S up p ort S u pe rv iso r - 1
A ccou n ting S erv ices S u pe rv iso r - 1
Ja ck D a ytonM o to r C a rrie r M a n a g er
J an S koubyD ire c to r
Missouri – Current Business
IRP and IFTA exist separately in a single mainframe system
IRP and IFTA audits are performed from information downloaded to D B software. Audited data re-entered into mainframe system
Operating Authority and OD/OW reside in separate mainframe systems
Accounting functionality is a mixture of mainframe and office application process
Missouri – Consolidation Implementation
One Facility- February 7, 2005 Class Room Cross Training Hands On Training Revising Rules and Regulations
– MCS Advisory Committee– OD/OW Task Force
Missouri – Additional Projects
Single web-based system for all programs with a common carrier account
Internet Protocol Phone system installed– Future integration with the web-based system
Industry Education
Beyond Cooperation between IRP and IFTA
Encourage jurisdictions to look beyond these two programs– Public protection– Increased compliance– Safer trucking transportation– Reduces burdens/better customer service– Increase revenue– Increase partner relationship
Advantages for the Motor Carrier
Assured compliance in all areas Elimination of duplicated information Training in all programs Ability to deal with one office One payment for all programs
California
• IFTA is administered by the Board of Equalization (BOE)
• IRP is administered by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
California
People of theState of California
Executive Director
State Board of Equalization
Chief Fuel Taxes Division
Motor Carrier Section
Deputy DirectorSpecial Taxes
Fuel Industry Section
Diesel, Gasoline, andAlternative Fuels Tax
Administration
IFTAIFTA Enforcement
California
• The California Commercial Vehicle Operations Strategic Business Plan (1999) recommended investigation of the reorganization and/or consolidation of organizational responsibilities
• No action was taken on the recommendation• The California Performance Review under
Governor Schwarzenegger did not recommend consolidation of BOE with any other agency
California
• DMV and BOE maintain separate databases• BOE participates in the Regional Processing
Center• The California Highway Patrol enforces IRP• BOE enforces IFTA• BOE is a revenue agency• Tax laws administered by BOE have extensive
language on audits, assessments and appeals
California
• California’s Motor Vehicle Code does not have extensive language on audits, assessments and appeals
• DMV handles many aspects of interstate carrier operations in addition to IRP (CDLs, insurance, medical cards, etc.)
• Notwithstanding, DMV and BOE are working cooperatively to find common ground in the audit of carriers and registration of carriers