[ieee 2010 32nd annual international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: [IEEE 2010 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2010) - Buenos Aires (2010.08.31-2010.09.4)] 2010 Annual International](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080505/5750abea1a28abcf0ce313ef/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Abstract—There is often a strong correlation between
elevated levels of intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma;
however, the underlying mechanisms that lead to blindness are
not well understood. The key may lie in the study of genetic
factors which determine IOP and lead to glaucoma-related
blindness. Mice are typically used for genetic research due to
their short generation time and accelerated lifespan,
manageability, the availability of established and pure lines,
and the ability to manipulate the genome. Post genetic
manipulation, IOP monitoring at regular intervals is needed
and for large scale testing, on the order of thousands of mice, it
is crucial to have at least a partially automated data collection
scheme. This work presents a fully wireless system on a chip
that measures 300 µm in its widest dimension, has a wireless
microwave-based data and power link, and is capable of
relaying digitized pressure recordings to a nearby base-station.
I. INTRODUCTION
LAUCOMA is a condition that stems from the buildup of
intraocular pressure (IOP) that causes the death of
retinal ganglion cells and degeneration of the optic nerve
which eventually leads to blindness. This disease is the
second leading cause of blindness, affects over 60 million
worldwide, and has caused bilateral blindness in over 8.4
million people [1].
Work done at Jackson Laboratory is exploring the
mechanisms behind cell death due to elevated levels of IOP
in glaucomatous subjects [2]. The mouse is the typical
animal model for genetic studies due to their quick
generation times, established lines, fully known genome, and
feasibility of genomic manipulations [3]. Furthermore, their
small size, relatively low cost, and ease of manageability
facilitates comprehensive studies requiring large matrices of
parametric variations. The genetic studies begin with the
breeding of a large matrix of genetically varied mice whose
genomes are altered through the addition of transgenes or the
variation of endogenous genes. IOP is then monitored
Manuscript received April 23, 2010. Funds are provided by a Howard
Hughes Medical Institute Collaborative Innovation Award.
E. Y. Chow was with Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
USA. He is now with Cyberonics, Inc., Houston, TX 77058 USA (phone:
719-640-5171; fax: 281-283-5522; e-mail: [email protected]).
S. W.M. John is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute
and professor at The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609 USA (e-
mail: [email protected]).
W. N. deVries is with Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609 USA.
D. Ha, T. Lin, and W. J. Chappell are with the Electrical and Computer
Engineering Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
USA (e-mail:[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]).
P. P. Irazoqui is with the Biomedical Engineering Department, Purdue
University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA (e-mail: [email protected]).
periodically for each mouse. Currently, the method for IOP
monitoring involves a manual measurement using a micro-
needle system [4]. The time and resources required for these
periodic tests are significant when performed on the
thousands of mice used in these genetic studies.
An automated approach would greatly facilitate mouse
IOP monitoring in glaucoma genetic studies and could
produce more accurate, thorough, and less costly results.
This work proposes an ultra-miniature ocular device, as
shown in Fig. 1, which is small enough for implantation
inside a mouse eye, fully wireless in terms of powering and
data transfer, and can perform periodic measurements of
IOP. The device consists of a 300 µm x 300 µm x 50 µm
application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a similarly
sized microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) pressure
sensor, and a 1 – 2 mm diameter loop antenna. The ASIC,
implemented using the Texas Instruments 130 nm CMOS
process, derives its power from a microwave-based far-field
source, captures 0.5 mmHg resolution measurements from
the MEMS sensor, amplifies and digitizes the data into an 8
bit word, and wirelessly transmits the data to the external
base-station.
II. DESIGN AND METHODS
To facilitate these glaucoma genetic studies, it is desirable
to design a pressure monitoring method that is capable of
capturing periodic IOP measurements from 7 to 8 mice per
cage and robust enough to function while the animals are
Sub-Cubic Millimeter Intraocular Pressure Monitoring Implant to
Enable Genetic Studies on Pressure-Induced Neurodegeneration Eric Y. Chow, Dohyuk Ha, Tse-Yu Lin, Wilhelmine N. deVries, Simon W.M. John, William J.
Chappell, and Pedro P. Irazoqui, Members, IEEE
G
Fig. 1. Conceptual illustration of wireless intraocular pressure
monitor implanted in the eye of a mouse
32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBSBuenos Aires, Argentina, August 31 - September 4, 2010
978-1-4244-4124-2/10/$25.00 ©2010 IEEE 6429
![Page 2: [IEEE 2010 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2010) - Buenos Aires (2010.08.31-2010.09.4)] 2010 Annual International](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080505/5750abea1a28abcf0ce313ef/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
mobile and moving about their enclosure. One IOP sensing
method is to implant a device that exhibits a change based
on pressure and whose change is detected and quantified by
an external device. Several works have achieved this passive
sensing approach through monitoring the resonance or
impedance of an implanted inductor-capacitor (LC) network
whose capacitance or inductance varies in response to
pressure [5]. Unfortunately, these passive measurement tools
all require a nearby (within a few mm) external device and
are not robust, work only in a very stable and controlled
environment, and cannot realistically deal with multiple
implanted animals [6]. This work presents an active sensing
method that captures microwave energy from a far-field
source, processes/amplifies/digitizes pressure measurements,
and wirelessly transmits the data to an external receiver.
A. Sensor Interface
A custom designed liquid-crystal-polymer (LCP) based
MEMS capacitive sensor is used to convert pressure
readings into capacitance value [7]. This device is connected
to the first stage of the sensor interface consisting of two
matched 1 µA current sources, shown in Fig. 2, which feed
the MEMS pressure sensor and a reference capacitor. Upon
the start of a measurement cycle, the two current sources
charge up the capacitors until the reference capacitor reaches
a voltage set by a Schmitt trigger based threshold detector.
Once the threshold detector is triggered, a control signal is
set to turn the current sources off, after which the voltages
on the two capacitors will remain steady. Since the charging
rate of the capacitors is proportional to its size, the voltage
on the MEMS capacitor, at the time the reference capacitor
voltage crosses the threshold, will depend on its capacitance
and therefore the pressure it is sensing. Now the reference
capacitor is set to the capacitance of the MEMS sensor at
atmospheric pressure. Thus, the difference between two
voltages at the top plate of the capacitors will correspond to
the pressure above atmospheric pressure that is sensed.
These voltages, or signals, are then fed through a
transmission gate, which allows the signal to pass once the
current sources have stopped, and then through a custom
sized source follower to remove the dc offset. This signal is
then amplified through a difference amplifier whose gain is
set to 51.25 which amplifies the voltage range,
corresponding to a pressure range of 50 mmHg, to the full
output swing of the amplifier, 0 V to 900 mV. Following
amplification, the signal is fed into a single-slope integrator-
based analog-to-digital convertor where it is digitized into an
8-bit word.
B. Wireless Powering, Charge Storage, and Regulation
An active implant has significant advantages in terms of
on-board signal processing, robustness, and overall
functionality; however, it does require a power supply. For
the target application, a power storage unit, such as a battery,
is not an option due to the size constraints, so wireless
powering schemes are explored. Inductive powering is a
commonly used technique; however, since it requires perfect
alignment and close proximity, it is only useful in stationary
situations [8]. To accommodate the situation of several
mobile mice in an enclosure, microwave-based far-field
powering is used to achieve a method that delivers sufficient
power over a distance of several 10s of centimeters and is
relatively orientation independent [9].
The radio-frequency (RF) energy is radiated from an
external source and picked up by the implant’s nitinol-based
loop antenna. The high frequency ac wave is then rectified
into a dc supply using a Cockcroft-Walton-based ac-to-dc
converter topology [10]. Schottky diodes are used in the
circuit due to their high frequency performance, which is a
result of their metal-on-semiconductor nature. Furthermore,
their typically low turn-on voltages enable to rectifier to
achieve much higher efficiencies than with other diode
types. This particular Cockcroft-Walton-based multiplier-
type topology is chosen because even for low input power
levels, the rectifier is still able to achieve a high enough
voltage to sufficiently bias the CMOS node. This ability
greatly enhances the robustness of the wireless powering
link; however, this operation is only achieved if the system
that this rectifier feeds is designed to consume relatively low
levels of power.
To minimize the average power consumption of the
system, a sleep-wake cycle is utilized. The system is
designed to take a measurement and transmit the data once
every 0.5 seconds; however, it only requires a couple 100 µs
for a measurement cycle, which includes capturing the
MEMS pressure sensor reading, amplifying, digitizing the
data, and wirelessly transmitting out the serial bit stream.
Therefore, the system is put into “sleep” mode between the
measurement cycles and a nanowatt timer is used to track
the slee-time and “wake” the system back up. The timer is is
achieved by first using the drain-to-soruce leakage current of
a transistor to source an on-chip capacitor. A threshold
detector is placed on the capacitor node such that when the
capacitor is charged to a specified level, the timer triggers
the wake-up of the system. The transistor and capacitor are
both sized such that the time it takes to charge the capacitor
Fig. 2. Simplified block diagram of sensor interface
6430
![Page 3: [IEEE 2010 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2010) - Buenos Aires (2010.08.31-2010.09.4)] 2010 Annual International](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080505/5750abea1a28abcf0ce313ef/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
up to the threshold is designed to be about 0.5 seconds.
A regulator is needed to provide a stable voltage supply to
the rest of the circuitry to ensure reliable operation. The
regulator’s primary goal is to maintain a constant voltage
independent of the varying current consumption of the
system. In this application, the regulator also has to tolerate
large variations in its input source since it is fed by the
rectifier whose dc output varies as a function of the RF
energy it sees at its input. In this work, a negative feedback
low-dropout regulator topology is used with a self-
compensating voltage reference to enable stable supply
regulation over a wide dc input swing.
C. Wireless Transmitter and Antenna
An np complementary cross-coupled LC voltage-
controlled-oscillator (VCO) is used to modulate the digital
data onto a 2.45 GHz RF carrier for wireless transmission.
The symmetry and bandpass characteristic of this LC
negative resistance oscillator gives it the lowest phase-noise
for a given power consumption [11]. A fully symmetric
inductor is designed to take advantage of the architecture’s
symmetry and optimize the overall phase noise. The signal is
modulated via on-off-keying (OOK), which is chosen for its
minimal complexity and low power consumption. The
digital data is fed into a switch which controls the bias
current supply for the oscillator switching it between on and
off states. The start time for the oscillator is significantly
shorter than a bit-duration and thus will have a negligible
effect on the data transfer and bit-error-rate. The transmitter
output is then fed to the nitinol-based loop antenna.
A loop antenna is chosen for this implantable device
because its closed form feature reduces the risk of damaging
the surrounding tissue and it also holds a relatively fixed
position inside the eye. To conform to the available space of
the mouse anterior chamber, the maximum diameter of the
loop antenna should not exceed 2 mm. To minimize damage,
the surgical incision length must be less than 1 mm,
therefore, to take full advantage of the available area within
the anterior chamber, a material with a self-expandable
characteristic is desired for the antenna. Our antenna utilizes
nitinol, a material comprised of half nickel and half titanium,
that has the property of shape memory and reverts back to its
original shape after deformation. Therefore after a surgeon
collapses the antenna for the insertion process, the loop will
expand back to its original shape after it is released in the
anterior chamber.
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
An assembled conceptual prototype is shown in Fig. 3,
which consists of a 300 x 300 x 300 µm3 silicon substrate,
representing the size of the final ASIC bonded with the
MEMS sensor, integrated with a 2 mm diameter nitinol loop
antenna.
The fabricated MEMS sensor has a sensitivity of 0.75
fF/mmHg and is currently 500 × 500 × 160 µm3; however,
work is being done to maintain this sensitivity and reduce
this length and width down to under 300 µm to meet the
surgical requirements [7]. At atmospheric pressure (760
mmHg), the sensor has a capacitance of 1.1765 pF, and at 60
mmHg above atmosphere, the capacitance is about 1.214 pF.
Therefore, the sensitivity of the MEMS device is about 0.75
fF/mmHg.
The MEMS capacitive sensor is integrated with the ASIC,
layout shown in Fig. 4, using a flip-chip-like bonding
method with anisotropic conductive adhesive [12]. The
sensor interface circuit consists of 1 µA current sources
which charge up the MEMS and reference capacitors to the
450 mV threshold in approximately 530 ns, depending on
the actual MEMS capacitance value. The charging time
difference is then converted to analog voltages and for a 0.75
fF change, the voltage difference is about 287.05 µV. These
voltages are then fed through a difference amplifier to
improve the signal integrity for the following digitization.
The pressure range of interest is 0 – 60 mmHg above
atmosphere and analytical calculations are used to determine
gain of 51.25 to utilize the full rail-to-rail output swing of 0
V to 900 mV. Post-amplification, the voltage value
corresponding to a 0.75 fF change is 14.711 mV. This
amplified signal is then sent to an 8-bit analog-to-digital
converter (ADC). The final result is an 8 bit digital word
representing pressures in the range of 0 – 60 mmHg above
atmosphere where each step size corresponds to a resolution
of 0.25 mmHg.
The digital data is then sent to the wireless transmitter for
modulation on the 2.45 GHz carrier frequency. The parallel
bits are first serialized through a switched multiplexer that
steps through each bit at a rate of 100 kbps. For error
correction and synchronization, 4 start and 4 end bits are
concatenated onto the 8-bit word. This 16-bit stream is then
fed into the 2.45 GHz transmitter. The phase noise of the
transmitter is simulated as -81.73 dBc/Hz at 100 KHz offset
and -102.52 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset. The simulated output
power is about 5.919 µW (-22 dBm). The transmitter
consumes a peak power of 585.1 µW; however, since OOK
Fig. 3. Conceptual prototype consisting of a 300 x 300 x 300 µm3
silicon substrate integrated with a 2 mm diameter nitinol loop antenna
6431
![Page 4: [IEEE 2010 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2010) - Buenos Aires (2010.08.31-2010.09.4)] 2010 Annual International](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080505/5750abea1a28abcf0ce313ef/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
modulation is used, the average power consumption is half
the peak value. The transmitter startup times between the on-
off switching are less than 100 ns which are low enough to
cause negligible interference with the 100 kbps data transfer.
This 292.55 µW average transmitter power is only
consumed for the 160 µS of time it takes to transmit out the
16-bits of data at 100 kbps.
A summary of the specifications including timings and
power consumptions are tabulated in Table I.
IV. CONCLUSION
There is a need for an automated testing method to
facilitate large-scale genetic testing of mice to determine the
root causes of glaucoma. In this work, we proposed a
miniature device which surgeons can implant into the mouse
eye to continuously monitor intraocular pressure. This active
device is remotely powered, amplifies and digitizes pressure
readings, wirelessly transmits the data to an external base
station. The ASIC captures pressure measurements with a
resolution down to 0.25 mmHg in a range of 0 to 60 mmHg
above atmosphere, digitizes the data into an 8-bit word,
periodically samples twice a second, and consumes less than
136 nW of average power. The far-field microwave-based
wireless techniques used to power and retrieve data provide
this implant with the robustness necessary to operate in a
cage with multiple mobile mice.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank Texas Instruments for
their design help and fabrication services.
REFERENCES
[1] H. A. Quigley and A. T. Broman, "The number of people with
glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020." vol. 90, 2006, pp. 262-
267.
[2] S. W. John, R. S. Smith, O. V. Savinova, N. L. Hawes, B. Chang,
D. Turnbull, M. Davisson, T. H. Roderick, and J. R. Heckenlively,
"Essential iris atrophy, pigment dispersion, and glaucoma in
DBA/2J mice," Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, vol. 39, pp. 951-962,
1998.
[3] K. Paigen, "A miracle enough: the power of mice," Nat Med, vol. 1,
pp. 215-220, 1995.
[4] S. W. John, J. R. Hagaman, T. E. MacTaggart, L. Peng, and O.
Smithes, "Intraocular pressure in inbred mouse strains." vol. 38,
1997, pp. 249-253.
[5] C. Po-Jui, D. C. Rodger, S. Saati, M. S. Humayun, and T. Yu-
Chong, "Microfabricated Implantable Parylene-Based Wireless
Passive Intraocular Pressure Sensors," Microelectromechanical
Systems, Journal of, vol. 17, pp. 1342-1351, 2008.
[6] U. Schnakenberg, P. Walter, G. vom Bögel, C. Krüger, H. C.
Lüdtke-Handjery, H. A. Richter, W. Specht, P. Ruokonen, and W.
Mokwa, "Initial investigations on systems for measuring
intraocular pressure," Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 85,
pp. 287-291, 2000.
[7] D. Ha, K. Musick, P. P. Irazoqui, and W. J. Chappell, "Parylene on
LCP Flexible Capacitive Pressure Sensor for Intraocular Pressure
Sensor," (Unpublished Work).
[8] N. Donaldson and T. Perkins, "Analysis of resonant coupled coils
in the design of radio frequency transcutaneous links," Medical and
Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 21, pp. 612-627, 1983.
[9] W. C. Brown, "The History of Power Transmission by Radio
Waves," Microwave Theory and Techniques, IEEE Transactions
on, vol. 32, pp. 1230-1242, 1984.
[10] E. Edgar and P. Lorrain, "The Cockcroft-Walton Voltage
Multiplying Circuit," Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 24, p. 6,
1953.
[11] A. Hajimiri and T. H. Lee, "Design issues in CMOS differential LC
oscillators," IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, 1999.
[12] E. Y. Chow, Y. Chin-Lung, A. Chlebowski, M. Sungwook, W. J.
Chappell, and P. P. Irazoqui, "Implantable Wireless Telemetry
Boards for In Vivo Transocular Transmission," Microwave Theory
and Techniques, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 56, pp. 3200-3208,
2008.
Fig. 4. Layout of 300 µm x 300 µm ASIC with sensor interface, voltage
regulator (Vreg), timer (Tim), wireless transmitter (TX), and RF
rectifier
TABLE I
ASIC SPECIFICATIONS
Specification Simulated Value Units
Sensor interface power
consumption
32.4 µW
Single-slope 8-bit ADC power
consumption
27 µW
Sensor interface
measurement time
500 ns
Digitization time 0 – 256 µs
Sleep time 0.5 s
Sampling rate 2 Hz
Average sleep power
consumption
26.78 nW
TX frequency 2.45 GHz
TX data-rate 100 kbps
TX output power -22 dBm
TX phase noise -81.728 @ 100 KHz
-102.524 @ 1 MHz
dBc/Hz
TX startup time < 100 ns
TX Power Consumption 585.1 (peak)
292.55 (average)
µW
Average total power
consumption
120.401 to 135.710 nW
6432