identification of phenotypes suitable for drug … · for both cultures, addition of 1µm mg2+...
TRANSCRIPT
Corporate Headquarters: Evotec SE, Manfred Eigen Campus, Essener Bogen 7, 22419 Hamburg, Germany Email: [email protected] Web: www.evotec.com
IDENTIFICATION OF PHENOTYPES SUITABLE FOR DRUG TESTING IN A GENETIC OR TOXIN-INDUCED MODEL OF PARKINSON'S
DISEASE USING HUMAN IPSC-DERIVED DOPAMINERGIC NEURONS.
Erika Torchio, Teresa Ferraro, Elisa Bianchini, Alessandra Toti, Andrea Kuan Cie Wong, Cristiana Griffante and Rosaria Remelli
In Vitro Pharmacology department, Aptuit (Verona) S.r.L., An Evotec Company
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by the progressive loss of midbrain
dopaminergic neurons (mDAn). Genetic mutations affecting mDA neurons account for up to 15% of PD
onsets, providing a valuable tool for studying basic pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease. One of
the most relevant mutations is the A53T mutation in the SNCA gene, which causes the production of a
misfolded form of alpha synuclein (αSyn), resulting in αSyn accumulation. It has been reported that PD
patient neurons display a ~20% reduction of mitochondrial complex I activity. Rotenone is known to
reduce mitochondrial complex I activity. Therefore testing Rotenone administration in vitro could mimic PD
effect on mDAn mitochondria functionality.
INTRODUCTION
AIM
The aim of this work is the identification of PD-relevant phenotypes for in vitro drug testing to be
applied in drug-discovery programs for Parkinson’s Disease
WT and A53T dopaminergic cultures differentiation in 384 well format
Dopaminergic neurons maturation in 384 well format: A. iPSC-derived DA-neurons maturation was confirmed by the
expression of the neuronal marker MAP2 and DA-specific markers tyrosine-hydroxylase (TH) and FOXA2. B. Bar graph
reports the % of TH-positive cells over live cells quantified by high content analysis (HCA). C. Viability of the cultures is
quantified by HCA at dd21 and 28 by measure of the number of live c/w. Bar graph represents mean ±SEM of at least 14
replicate wells.
A53TWT
TH Hoechst
FOXA2
MAP2 TH Hoechst
WTMAP2 TH Hoechst
A53T
50 µm 50 µm
A
dd21
dd28
WT A53T0
20
40
60
80
TH
+ c
ells [
%]
B DA maturation - dd21
Fold vs WT21 Nuclei # dd21-28
WT A53T WT A53T 0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Fo
ld v
s W
T d
d21 L
IVE
C Live cells count
dd21 dd28
TH Hoechst
FOXA2
Time dependent αSYN accumulation in A53T mDAn cultures: A. αSYN MSD quantifications performed at dd21 and
28 revealed time-dependent accumulation of αSYN in A53T versus WT mDAn cultures. The graph bars report the fold increase
of the αSYN MSD signal of A53T over the signal of WT at each time point. The maximum fold of 1.63 was detected at dd28. B.
αSYN MSD quantifications in four independent cultures lysates at dd28 confirmed higher αSYN MSD signal in A53T versus
WT (fold: 1.76 ±0.11, p≤0.001; t-test). Comparable GAPDH MSD signal in WT and A53T dd28 lysates (subset samples)
confirmed uniform sample loading in αSYN MSD studies. MSD assays were performed in technical duplicates.
Mesoscale assay for sensitive αSYN quantification from mDAn lysates
αSYN quantification assay set up: Mesoscale Discovery (MSD) 96-well
assay kit was employed for quantification of total αSYN from mDAns cell
lysates. Linearity test of A53T lysates (dd28) was performed with 1µg and
0.5µg of lysates from A53T mDAn. ECL signal revealed linear αSYN
detection within the linear range of the calibration curve. 0.25µg/well was
the condition selected for the following quantifications in mDAn cultures.
SYN CRC
1 10 100 1000 10000 10000010
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
pg/mL
EC
L s
ign
al
0.5µg A53T
1µg A53T
αSYN GAPDH
A BαSYN time course MSD analysis dd28
αSYN accumulation in A53T DaN cultures
WT A53T0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0WT
A53T
-SYN MSD
***
-S
YN
fo
ld v
s W
T
WT A53T0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5WT
A53T
GAPDH MSD
GA
PD
H f
old
vs W
T
cultura #9
dd21 dd280
20000
40000
60000
80000WT
A53T
EC
L s
ign
al
A B
Cal 520
Different pattern of spontaneous Calcium oscillations in WT and A53T mDAn
Comparable Ionomycin responseIono addition
WT A53T0
5100 5
1100 6
2100 6
WT
IONO: initial phase representedmobilization of intracellular stores andthe sustained component representedCa2+ influx
A53T
AU
C
0 200 400 600 8000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
E7
E18
Time (s)
RF
U
+Mg2+
RL
UR
LU
WT
A53T +Mg2+
1200 sec
A53T
WTWT
A53T
Increased frequency of Calcium oscillations in A53T DaNs compared to WT detected with FLIPR
measurements in 384 well-format: Calcium oscillations with increased frequency were detected with FLIPR
measurements in A53T cultures compared to WT at dd21 and dd28. A. Representative Calcium traces detected in WT and
A53T mDAn. For both cultures, addition of 1µM Mg2+ inhibited spontaneous oscillations. Comparable cultures viability was
confirmed by Cal520 staining and evaluation of the response to addition of 1µM Ionomycin (B).
C. Peak analysis revealed peak frequency (BMP) 1.61 fold higher in A53T versus WT (p≤0.001; t-test), 0.57 fold reduced peak
spacing (p≤0.001; t-test) and comparable peak amplitude. FLIPR tests performed in 4 different cultures under comparable cell
viability revealed average increase of peak frequency of A53T versus WT of 1.52 ±0.1 and variable peak amplitude (fold A53T
versus WT: 1.26 ±0.26).
C Peak frequency Peak spacing Peak amplitudePeak Amplitude
WT A53T0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500WT
A53T
Avera
ge P
eak a
mp
litu
de
Peak Frequency
WT A53T0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8WT
A53T
BM
P
CDI d28_TMRE peripheral mitochondria
WT A53T0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2 ***
TM
RE
peri
f. m
ito
ch
on
dri
a
Inte
nsit
y (
fold
vs W
T)
Peak Spacing
WT A53T0
100
200
300WT
A53T
Avera
ge P
eak S
PA
CIN
G
CDI d28_TMRE peripheral mitochondria
WT A53T0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2 ***
TM
RE
peri
f. m
ito
ch
on
dri
a
Inte
nsit
y (
fold
vs W
T)
BM
P
Avg
. p
eak s
pacin
g (
sec)
Avg
. p
eak a
mp
litu
de
In this study, an extensive phenotypic characterization of iPSC-derived mDAn cultures carrying a PD-
relevant mutation (A53T) was performed in parallel to isogenic healthy control cultures (WT). Moreover,
acute and chronic Rotenone administration on WT mDAn was used to induce mitochondrial stress.
Key cellular features related to PD pathogenesis were explored:
mDAn differentiated in 384 well plates express neuronal marker MAP2 and DA-specific markers
tyrosine-hydroxylase (TH) and FOXA2
Compared to WT mDAn, an accumulation of αSYN was detected in A53T cells after 28 days in culture
A53T mDAn display a different pattern of spontaneous Calcium oscillations compared to WT cells,
potentially revealing a dysregulation of intracellular Calcium homeostasis (FLIPR 384-well assay)
A reduced mitochondrial membrane potential was detected in A53T mDAn compared to WT cells
A53T mDAn show higher basal respiration compared to WT in Seahorse XF metabolic assay
Rotenone administration results in reduction of cell viability and MMP (acute treatment), as well as in
reduction of mitochondrial respiration (chronic treatment). Inhibition of Complex I was compensated by
induction of other mitochondrial complexes and of glycolysis.
The above mentioned assays provide a panel of readouts suitable for testing potential therapeutics acting
on different PD pathophysiological mechanisms.
METHODS
mDAn cultures: iCell® DopaNeurons (WT) and MyCell® DopaNeurons (A53T) were seeded according to vendor’s instruction in
iCell Neural medium (Fujfilm Cellular Dynamics) on PDL/PLO/Laminin coated plates. Cells were seeded at the density of 65,000
(WT) and 50,000 (A53T) c/w for imaging studies (384w plates); at 130,000 (WT) or 100,000 (A53T) c/w (96w plates) for FLIPR
and Seahorse studies. Culture medium was replaced with BrainPhys™ Neuronal Medium (StemCell Technology) after 3 days in
culture and maintained for up to dd21 or dd28 with half medium volume exchange twice/week.
Immunofluorescence and Imaging: Cells were fixed in paraformaldehyde, permeabilized and incubated with primary
antibodies, followed by fluorescent secondary antibodies. Primary antibodies: Ms-anti-αSYN BD-610786; Ch-anti-TH (Abcam
ab76442), Rb-anti-FOXA2 (Cell Signalling 8186), Ms-anti-MAP2 (Abcam ab32454). All images were captured with InCell Analyzer
2200 and analyzed with Columbus Image Analysis System (PerkinElmer).
Mesoscale Immunoassay: Mesoscale Discovery (MSD) 96-well assay kit U-PLEX human αSYN K151WKK and GAPDH-
K151PWD were used according to manufacturer instructions. For testing αSYN, 0.25µg/well was used, for GAPDH 0.125µg/well.
FLIPR Ca2+ assay: Cells were stained with 10µM Cal520 calcium indicator (Abcam) in Tyrode’s buffer without Mg2+.
Measurements were carried out for 20 minutes. FLIPR Screenworks® Peak Pro™ Software was used for Peak analysis.
TMRE assay: cells were incubated with 30nM TMRE (Invitrogen) for 30 minutes in culture media without phenol-red, followed by
5 minutes of incubation with HOECHST for nuclei staining.
Seahorse XF assay: Cells were pre-incubated for 1h with assay buffer before the experiment (Agilent Seahorse XF DMEM, 25mM
Glucose, 2mM Glutamine, 1mM Na-Pyruvate). All stimuli were prepared as 10x solutions and added automatically by Seahorse XF
instrument. 3 measurements were taken for baseline and 4 measurement were taken after every stimulus.
REFERENCES: (1) Kweon et al. 2004, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M407336200. (2) Zheng et al. 2016, DOI: 10.7554/eLife.13374
Reduced mitochondrial membrane potential in A53T vs WT mDAn cultures
A TMRE staining Image analysis
20 µm
A53TWTTMRE Hoechst
SOMATIC TMRE PERIPHERAL TMRE
TMRE intensity quantifications performed in the cell soma and in the peripheral mitochondria showed lower
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential (MMP) in A53T cultures versus WT: A. TMRE assay was performed on WT and
A53T cultures at dd21 and dd28 and HCA was employed for analysis. Nuclear masks were identified based on Hoechst staining
and cell masks were segmented on the TMRE signal. For peripheral mitochondria identification, TMRE spot masks were
identified in the area surrounding the cells. B. Average data for each time-point from two independent cultures of WT and
A53T mDAn are reported. Comparable cell area was quantified in live WT and A53T cells. TMRE intensity quantified in the cell
soma of A53T displayed significantly lower signal at both time points (fold A53T vs WT: dd21, 0.87±0.01, p≤0.001; dd28
0.88±0.02, p≤0.01; t-test). Additionally, lower TMRE average intensity was detected in peripheral mitochondria (fold A53T vs
WT: dd21, 0.84±0.01, p≤0.001; dd28, 0.87±0.02, p≤0.001; t-test ).
CDI d28_Cytoplasm area
WT A53T0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
Cell A
rea
(fo
ld v
s W
T)
CDI d28_TMRE peripheral mitochondria
WT A53T0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2 ***
TM
RE
peri
f. m
ito
ch
on
dri
a
Inte
nsit
y (
fold
vs W
T)
CDI d28_TMRE soma cytoplasm
WT A53T0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2 **
TM
RE
Cell In
ten
sit
y
(fo
ld v
s W
T)
CDI d21_Cytoplasm area
WT A53T0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
Cell A
rea
(fo
ld v
s W
T)
CDI d21_TMRE peripheral mitochondria
WT A53T0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
***T
MR
E p
eri
f. m
ito
ch
on
dri
a
Inte
nsit
y (
fold
vs W
T)
CDI d21_TMRE soma cytoplasm
WT A53T0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
***
TM
RE
Cell In
ten
sit
y
(fo
ld v
s W
T)
BCell area
dd
21
dd
28
Somatic
mitochondria intensity
Peripheral
mitochondria intensity
Higher basal mitochondrial respiration in A53T mDAn compared to WT Chronic Rotenone administration reduces basal mitochondrial respiration
NT Rot. 1nM Rot. 5nM Rot. 10nM
0
200
400
600
800
Cell count
NT
Rot. 1nM
Rot. 5nM
Cell n
um
ber
NT Rot. 1nM Rot. 5nM Rot. 10nM
0
20
40
60
80
Total OCR Capacity
OC
R %
Acute administration of Rotenone reduces cell viability and MMP in WT mDAn
WT mDAn viability and MMP is reduced upon acute administration of Rotenone: Rotenone was administered on
WT mDAn for 24, 48 or 72h. A. Rotenone reduced the cell viability in a time-dependent manner with EC50 2.3nM at both 24
and 48h, but with a maximal effect at 48h. To assess cell viability, RT-Glo luminescence were measured using CLARIOstar
(BMG LABTECH) B. TMRE assay was performed on cells treated with Rotenone dilution curve after 48h of treatment.
Rotenone reduced the MMP with an EC50 of 9.5nM.
Metabolic analysis of Mitochondrial functionality of A53T and WT mDAn at dd21 and dd28 by Seahorse XF
Analyzer (Agilent). A. OCR traces at dd21 and dd28 and Seahorse protocol. B. Quantification of variation of OCR (OCR %)
induced by applied stimuli. Live cell number quantified by HCA (HOECHST) was used to normalize basal levels of respiration
and glycolysis. Dot plot graph represents mean ±SEM.
• A53T cells have higher basal respiration compared to WT mDAn (i).
• Both lines have similar response to OligomycinA (ii) and similar maximum respiratory capacity (iii), suggesting similar
functionality of mitochondria in WT and A53T cells. Further studies will be performed to investigate whether the difference
in basal respiration is due to differences in mitochondrial number.
• Complex I (iv) is more used than Complex III (v), which is inactive in both WT and A53T mDAn.
• Comparing dd21 with dd28, In both lines there is an increase in basal respiration (i), an increased utilization of respiratory
capacity (~50% at dd21, ~100% at dd28) (iii), and a loss of glycolytic spare capacity (iii ECAR), suggesting metabolic
maturation at dd28.
WT d
d21
WT d
d28
A53
T dd21
A53
T dd28
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Cell number
Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test
WT dd21 vs WT dd28 8
WT dd21 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
WT dd28 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd28 vs A53T dd28 8
A53T dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
Mean Diff.
209.0
-102.0
129.8
-311.0
-79.19
231.8
t
6.213
3.034
4.026
8.649
2.286
6.690
Significant? P < 0.05?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Summary
***
*
**
***
ns
***
95% CI of diff
111.9 to 306.0
-199.1 to -4.965
36.74 to 222.8
-414.8 to -207.2
-179.2 to 20.81
131.8 to 331.8
***
***
Cell n
um
ber
WT d
d21
WT d
d28
A53
T dd21
A53
T dd28
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Normalized Basal Respiration
Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test
WT dd21 vs WT dd28 8
WT dd21 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
WT dd28 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd28 vs A53T dd28 8
A53T dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
Mean Diff.
-0.06485
-0.04984
-0.1784
0.01501
-0.1135
-0.1285
t
7.287
5.327
20.88
1.442
11.72
12.72
Significant? P < 0.05?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Summary
***
***
***
ns
***
***
95% CI of diff
-0.09005 to -0.03965
-0.07633 to -0.02335
-0.2025 to -0.1542
-0.01447 to 0.04449
-0.1409 to -0.08608
-0.1571 to -0.09990
***
***
# # #
OC
R/c
ell n
um
ber
WT d
d21
WT d
d28
A53
T dd21
A53
T dd28
0
20
40
60
80
100
ATPase Activity
OC
R %
WT d
d21
WT d
d28
A53
T dd21
A53
T dd28
-50
0
50
100
Maximum Respiratory Capacity
Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test
WT dd21 vs WT dd28 8
WT dd21 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
WT dd28 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd28 vs A53T dd28 8
A53T dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
Mean Diff.
48.09
9.280
73.87
-38.81
25.78
64.59
t
10.19
2.030
15.65
8.489
5.461
14.13
Significant? P < 0.05?
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Summary
***
ns
***
***
***
***
95% CI of diff
34.56 to 61.61
-3.816 to 22.38
60.34 to 87.40
-51.90 to -25.71
12.26 to 39.31
51.49 to 77.69
***
# # #
***
OC
R %
Live cell count
Normalized
Basal Respiration
ATP Synthase
Activity
Maximum
Respiratory Capacity
dd21 dd28
WT
dd21 dd28
A53T
dd21 dd28
WT
dd21 dd28
A53T
dd21 dd28
WT
dd21dd28
A53T
dd21 dd28
WT
dd21 dd28
A53T
B
i ii iii
WT d
d21
WT d
d28
A53
T dd21
A53
T dd28
0
20
40
60
80
100
Complex I Activity
Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test
WT dd21 vs WT dd28 8
WT dd21 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
WT dd28 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd28 vs A53T dd28 8
A53T dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
Mean Diff.
-36.88
3.153
-45.24
40.03
-8.358
-48.39
t
12.99
1.156
16.58
13.18
2.751
16.49
Significant? P < 0.05?
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Summary
***
ns
***
***
ns
***
95% CI of diff
-44.90 to -28.86
-4.552 to 10.86
-52.94 to -37.53
31.45 to 48.61
-16.94 to 0.2246
-56.68 to -40.10
******
OC
R %
WT d
d21
WT d
d28
A53
T dd21
A53
T dd28
0
2
4
6
8
10
Complex II Activity
OC
R %
WT d
d21
WT d
d28
A53
T dd21
A53
T dd28
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
Basal Glycolysis
Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test
WT dd21 vs WT dd28 8
WT dd21 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
WT dd28 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd28 vs A53T dd28 8
A53T dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
Mean Diff.
-0.01280
-0.003609
-0.02415
0.009188
-0.01136
-0.02054
t
6.504
1.733
13.32
4.064
5.633
9.653
Significant? P < 0.05?
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Summary
***
ns
***
**
***
***
95% CI of diff
-0.01845 to -0.007140
-0.009596 to 0.002378
-0.02937 to -0.01894
0.002689 to 0.01569
-0.01715 to -0.005560
-0.02666 to -0.01443
***
# # #
***
EC
AR
/cell n
um
ber
WT d
d21
WT d
d28
A53
T dd21
A53
T dd28
-50
0
50
100
150
Maximum Glycolytic Capacity
Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test
WT dd21 vs WT dd28 8
WT dd21 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
WT dd28 vs A53T dd21 1
WT dd28 vs A53T dd28 8
A53T dd21 vs A53T dd28 8
Mean Diff.
89.46
-34.49
86.97
-123.9
-2.488
121.5
t
18.91
7.545
19.02
26.20
0.5259
26.57
Significant? P < 0.05?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Summary
***
***
***
***
ns
***
95% CI of diff
75.99 to 102.9
-47.51 to -21.48
73.95 to 99.98
-137.4 to -110.5
-15.96 to 10.98
108.4 to 134.5
***
# # #
***EC
AR
%
Complex I Activity Complex III ActivityNormalized
Basal Glycolysis
Maximum
Glycolytic Capacity
dd21 dd28
WT
dd21 dd28
A53T
dd21 dd28
WT
dd21 dd28
A53T
dd21 dd28
WT
dd21 dd28
A53T
dd21 dd28
WT
dd21 dd28
A53T
iv v i ECAR iii ECAR Metabolic analysis of Mitochondrial functionality of WT mDAn after chronic Rotenone treatment. WT mDAn
were treated with Rotenone from dd3 to dd21 to simulate chronic inhibition of Complex I.
5 and 10nM of chronic Rotenone treatment reduced cell viability and basal respiration (i) but had no effect on ATP Synthase
activity (ii). 10nM Rotenone stimulus was used to reduce Complex I activity by 20%, revealing increased cell vulnerability of
cells chronically pre-treated with Rotenone (iv). To compensate chronic reduction of Complex I, mDAn adopted two strategies:
induction of other mitochondrial complexes (v) and induction of glycolysis (i ECAR). Dot plot graph represents mean ±SEM,
**=p ≤0.01, ***=p≤0.001, ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test.
Maximum
Respiratory Capacity
Live cell count
iii
***
***
NT Rot. 1nM Rot. 5nM Rot. 10nM
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Normalized Basal Respiration
NT
Rot. 1nM
Rot. 5nM
OC
R/c
ell n
um
ber
NT Rot. 1nM Rot. 5nM Rot. 10nM
0
20
40
60
80
ATPase Activity
OC
R %
i
Normalized
Basal Respiration
ATP Synthase
Activityii
***
***
***
***
***
NT Rot. 1nM Rot. 5nM Rot. 10nM
0
20
40
60
Partial Inhibition of Complex I
OC
R %
NT Rot. 1 nM Rot. 5 nM Rot. 10 nM
-10
0
10
20
Spare Respiratory Capacity
NT
Rot. 1 nM
Rot. 5 nM
Rot. 10 nM
OC
R %
20% Inhibition
Complex I
Spare
Respiratory Capacityiv v**
**
CONCLUSIONS
Normalized
Basal Glycolysis
BASAL
ii
iv
v
i
iii
Oligomycin A
1µM
FCCP
1µM
Rotenone
10nM
Rotenone
0.5µM
● NT=Not Treated
● Rot 1nM
● Rot 5nM
● Rot 10nM
A
dd21 dd28
i
ii
iii
iv v
● WT
● A53T
● WT
● A53T
Oligomycin A
1µM
FCCP
1µM
Rotenone
0.5µM
Antimycin A
0.5µM
Oligomycin A
1µM
FCCP
1µM
Rotenone
0.5µM
Antimycin A
0.5µM
RESULTS
OCR (pmol/min) = oxygen consumption rate ECAR (mpH/min) = extracellular acidification rate
ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test*** = p<0.001 (dd21 vs dd28)### = p<0.001 (WT vs A53T)
48h
-12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -40
20
40
60
80
100
12024h
48h
72h
Rotenone log [M]%
of
CT
RL
-11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -40
20
40
60
80
100
120
Oligomycin log [M]
% o
f C
TR
L
-12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -40
20
40
60
80
100
12024h
48h
72h
Rotenone log [M]%
of
CT
RL
Cell viability Mitochondrial Membrane Potential
-12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -50
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Rotenone log [M]
TM
RE
sig
nal in
ten
sit
y
A B
NT Rot. 1nM Rot. 5nM Rot. 10nM
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
0.045
Normalized Basal Glycolysis
EC
AR
/cell n
um
ber
NT Rot. 1nM Rot. 5nM Rot. 10nM
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
0.045
Normalized Basal Glycolysis
EC
AR
/cell n
um
ber
i ECAR