identification and quantification of polysorbate ... · biopharmaceuticals using advanced mass...
TRANSCRIPT
Michael Zorn
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG
Innovation Unit
Analytical Development Biologicals
Identification and Quantification of Polysorbate-degrading Host Cell Protein Impurities in Biopharmaceuticals using Advanced Mass Spectrometry-based Techniques
Outline
14 March 2019 AT Europe 2019, Dublin 2
• Introduction to process-related protein impurities
Bioprocess and host cell proteins (HCPs)
Polysorbate-degradation through lipolytic enzyme activity
• Advanced sample preparation strategies for sensitive identification and quantification of HCPs
in bulk drug substance via LC-MS
I. Quantification of target lipases in polysorbate-free drug substance
II. Hexapeptide-based HCP-enrichment and isotope dilution mass spectrometry for
relative quantification of lipases
III. Establishment of an activity-based probes (ABP) proteomic workflow for lipase profiling
• Summary
Process-related Protein Impurities
3
Bioreactor Primary recovery centrifugation
Affinity chromatography
Polishing I chromatography
Polishing II chromatography
DS/DP
Y
Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y
Y Y
HCP-
Level
~106 ppm ~103 ppm ~102 ppm <10 ppm
Upstream processing Downstream processing
Walker et al., 'A modular and adaptive mass spectrometry-based platform for support of bioprocess development toward optimal host cell protein clearance‚‚ mAbs Volume 9, 2017
14 March 2019
4
Impact of Process-related Protein Impurities
Potential to impact product quality, efficacy and patient safety
• May potentially induce immune response in patients
• Impact of API potency by blockage of mAb paratope
• Undesired API variants due to presence of catalytic activity of proteases and disulfide
reductases
• Polysorbate degradation by lipolytic enzymes
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 14 March 2019
Impact of Process-related Protein Impurities on Excipients Stability
• Polysorbates commonly used to improve
stability of API
• Present in majority of biopharmaceuticals
• Prone to degradation by hydrolysis and
auto-oxidation
• Susceptible to enzymatic cleavage of ester
bond because of structural similarity to
triglycerides
Polysorbate
Hydrolysis
FFA
+
mAb without PS20 mAb with PS20
5 14 March 2019
Siska et al., J. Pharm. Sci., 104, 447 (2015)
AT Europe 2019, Dublin
Strategy for Identification and Quantification of Process-related Protein Impurities
6
Protein A affinity chromatography
HCP Level
Dynamic Range
Downstream in-process control samples
Product pools Wash pools
Polishing chromatographies
Product pools Column regeneration pools
Bulk drug substance
Harvested cell culture fluid Target lipase profiling Application of untargeted LC-MS
methods
Identification & quantification of target lipases Single- or multi-analyte ELISA Targeted LC-MS methods
AT Europe 2019, Dublin
Targeted method development guided by theoretical and experimental input
14 March 2019
Outline
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 7
• Introduction to process-related protein impurities
Bioprocess and host cell proteins (HCPs)
Polysorbate-degradation through lipolytic enzyme activity
• Advanced sample preparation strategies for sensitive identification and quantification of HCPs
in bulk drug substance via LC-MS
I. Quantification of target lipases in polysorbate-free drug substance
II. Hexapeptide-based HCP-enrichment and isotope dilution mass spectrometry for
relative quantification of lipases
III. Establishment of an activity-based probes (ABP) proteomic workflow for lipase profiling
• Summary
14 March 2019
Quantification of Lipases in Polysorbate-free Drug Substance
8
untargeted LC-MS-analysis : Harvested cell culture fluid
Drug substance (polysorbate-free)
Assessment of analytical limits: LOD/LOQ
Targeted LC-MS/MS-analysis and quantification
HCP profile analysis
Development of targeted LC-MS/MS methods for the quantification of PLBL2, LPL and LPLA2
in polysorbate-free drug substance
Lipase quantification
14 March 2019
9
LOD and LOQ Assessment for LPL, PLBL2, and LPLA2
Sample preparation:
recombinant PLBL2, LPLA2 and LPL proteins were spiked
into polysorbate-free drug substance at 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1,
2, 5, 10, and 20 ppm
Native digestion* and removal of incompletely digested
mAb by heating and centrifugation
LC-MS instrumental setup and data processing
Waters Acquity Arc HPLC (85 min gradient-run) coupled to
Thermo Q Exactive Plus
Parallel reaction monitoring data analysis software:
Skyline 4.1
*Huang, et. Al. Anal. Chem., 2017, 89 (10), pp 5436–5444
9
+
Peptide mixture
Spiking of recombinant lipases
14 March 2019
10
0
25
50
75
100
125
0 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.5 ppm 1 ppm 2 ppm 5 ppm 10 ppm 20 ppm
%C
V
Spiked-in Concentration
LPL precision for each peptide
LVAALYK
VFHYQVK
y = 389076x - 14284 R² = 0.9771
0.00E+00
1.00E+06
2.00E+06
3.00E+06
4.00E+06
5.00E+06
6.00E+06
7.00E+06
8.00E+06
9.00E+06
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Tota
l Pea
k A
rea
mixed-in ppm
Calibration curve
LVAALYK
Limit of Quantification Assessment for LPL
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 14 March 2019
11
Limit of Quantification Assessment for LPL
AT Europe 2019, Dublin
LPL can be confidently detected at 5 ppm spiking level. The recovery was determined by comparing the theoretical spiking level and the readout from the standard curve by peptide LVAALYK. The LOQ for LPL is determined as 10 ppm.
14 March 2019
Readout from standard curve (ppm)
LVAALYK - - - - 0.2 1.2 5.8 11.7 19.1
Spiked-in value 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 20.0
Spiked-in recovery [%]
- - - - 23.1 60.3 115.7 117.1 95.3
Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantification for PLBL2, LPL and LPLA2
12
Lipase Limit of detection Limit of quantification
PLBL2* <2 ppm <2 ppm
LPLA2 1 ppm 1 ppm
LPL 5 ppm 10 ppm
*PLBL2 exists in the respective drug substance.
LOD determination criteria: The MS2 detectible level
LOQ determination criteria: Spiked-in recovery= 75-125%, and precision CV% for each peptide measurement ≤25%
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 14 March 2019
Outline
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 13
• Introduction to process-related protein impurities
Bioprocess and host cell proteins (HCPs)
Polysorbate-degradation through lipolytic enzyme activity
• Advanced sample preparation strategies for sensitive identification and quantification of HCPs
in bulk drug substance via LC-MS
I. Quantification of target lipases in polysorbate-free drug substance
II. Hexapeptide-based HCP-enrichment and isotope dilution mass spectrometry for
relative quantification of lipases
III. Establishment of an activity-based probes (ABP) proteomic workflow for lipase profiling
• Summary
14 March 2019
Mechanism of HCP Enrichment by ProteoMinerTM Kit
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 14
Elution of HCPs with MS- compatible solvents
LC-MS analysis
Load
Eluate
Combinatorial hexapeptide library – highly complex and a binding partner should exist for every protein
Majority of highly abundant API is depleted while low abundant HCPs are retained
14 March 2019
Relative Quantification of Lipase Level in Drug Substance via Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry
15
Untargeted LC-MS-analysis of harvested cell culture fluid
Hexapeptide-based enrichment of HCPs from bulk drug substance
Tryptic digestion and spiking of stable isotope labeled synthetic (SIS)-peptides
LC-MS/MS-analysis
Investigation of HCP profile
Targeted LC-MS/MS- analysis
Relative quantification of lipases
+
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 14 March 2019
16
Bulk drug substance batch I II
Lipase I level 100% 98%
Lipase II level 100% 467%
Observation of PS20 degradation - +
Relative Quantification of Lipase Level in Drug Substance via Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry
Relative quantification of lipase levels in BDS indicates Lipase II as
the potential lipolytic enzyme causing PS20-degradation
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 14 March 2019
Outline
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 17
• Introduction to process-related protein impurities
Bioprocess and host cell proteins (HCPs)
Polysorbate-degradation upon lipolytic enzyme activity
• Advanced sample preparation strategies for sensitive identification and quantification of HCPs
via LC-MS in bulk drug substance
I. Quantification of target lipases in polysorbate-free drug substance
II. Hexapeptide-based HCP-enrichment and isotope dilution mass spectrometry for
relative quantification of lipases
III. Establishment of an activity-based probes (ABP) proteomic workflow for lipase profiling
• Summary
14 March 2019
Activity-based Probes for Profiling lipolytic Enzymes
18
Product with lipolytic activity
Addition of activity- based probe (ABP)
Residual lipase activity testing
Affinity capture of enzyme-inhibitor complexes
Proteolytic digestion
LC-MS-analysis
m/z
Rel
. In
ten
sity
[%]
Protein identification
Incubation
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 14 March 2019
Bioorg Med Chem. 2000 Mar;8(3):507-13. 19
Activity-based Probes for Profiling lipolytic Enzymes
Biotin - affinity tag Reductive cleavage site 4-nitrophenyl activated phosphonate
14 March 2019
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 20
• PS20 stability testing in DS/DP material in
presence of lipase-inhibitor
• Incubation for several days at 25°C
• LC-MS-monitoring of intact Polysorbate-esters
e. g. isosorbide C12
• LC-MS-monitoring of free fatty acids
e. g. lauric acid
Screening for effective Lipase-Inhibitors
+ ABP
DS/DP material
LC-MS-detection of POE and FFA
Hydrolysis
FFA
+
POE
Inhibited lipases
14 March 2019
AT Europe 2019, Dublin 21
Activity-based Probes for Profiling lipolytic Enzymes
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
rela
tive
In
ten
sity
[%
]
Incubation time [days]
Isosorbide C12 Placebo
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
rela
tive
In
ten
sity
[%
]
Incubation time [days]
Isosorbide C12 Drug Substance
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n [
ng/
mL]
Incubation time [days]
Lauric Acid Placebo
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n [
ng/
mL]
Incubation time [days]
Lauric Acid Drug Substance
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
rela
tive
In
ten
sity
[%
]
Incubation time [days]
Isosorbide C12 Inhibitor I
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
rela
tive
In
ten
sity
[%
]
Incubation time [days]
Isosorbide C12 Inhibitor II
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n [
ng/
mL]
Incubation time [days]
Lauric Acid Inhibitor I
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n [
ng/
mL]
Incubation time [days]
Lauric Acid Inhibitor II
LC-MS-analysis of FFA content
LC-MS-analysis of POE content
14 March 2019
22
Summary
AT Europe 2019, Dublin
Strategy for the identification & quantififcation of polysorbate-degrading enzymes
in biopharmaceutical products
Native digestion and LC-MS-analysis of polysorbate-free drug substance allows
quantification of LPL, PLBL2 and LPLA2 ≤ 10 ppm
Hexapeptide-based HCP-enrichment and isotope-dilution mass spectrometry are
advantageous for relative lipase quantification in bulk drug substance material
Establishment of activity-based probes for profiling of lipolytically active enzymes
14 March 2019
23
Acknowledgement
AT Europe 2019, Dublin
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG
DEV ADB & RES MedChem, Biberach
Bernd Reisinger
Andreas Feigler
Corinna Ruedi
Kathrin Fischer
Marianne Scheffold
Florian Binder
BP BPAD, Fremont
Yuan Gao
Guifeng Jiang
Sara Wright
Min Zhu
14 March 2019
Thank you for your Attention
24 AT Europe 2019, Dublin
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG
DEV ADB & RES MedChem, Biberach
Bernd Reisinger
Andreas Feigler
Corinna Ruedi
Kathrin Fischer
Marianne Scheffold
Florian Binder
BP BPAD, Fremont
Yuan Gao
Guifeng Jiang
Sara Wright
Min Zhu
14 March 2019