ideal spectator approach lecture 2 “the hypothesis which we embrace is plain. it maintains that...
TRANSCRIPT
Ideal spectator approachLecture 2
“The hypothesis which we embrace is plain. It maintains that morality is determined by sentiment. It defines virtue to be whatever mental action or quality gives to a spectator the pleasing sentiment of approbation; and vice the contrary.” --Hume, Appendix I
Topics today:
Hume’s view of moral judgment His critique of the rationalist
position
Sec. 5: Why utility pleases Why do we morally admire those
qualities that are socially useful? Can’t just be a result of education.
There must be a basis in human nature.
2 possibilities: self-regard or humanitarian concern
Self-regard or concern for others? Moral sentiment can oppose our self-interest Can concern matters that don’t affect our self-
interest far away in space or time fictional
Concern for self and moral concern feel different
Moral sentiment cannot be a form of self-regard
Must be a concern for others
Universal benevolence
Rooted in an innate human capacity for sympathy
Sympathy can take the form of a sentiment of benevolence toward all, a humanitarian concern.
This concern is what drives our moral judgments
Objection
Sympathy leads to more concern for those close to us
Our moral judgments do not vary in this way
Reply
Unequal concern arises from a biased point of view
An impartial consideration of the situation channels benevolence equally toward all
Correct moral judgments express the attitudes of an impartial, sympathetic observer
Role of reason in morality Reason ascertains facts about
what promotes or diminishes pleasure and happiness
So reason plays a role But reason does not make the
moral judgment Moral judgment expresses a
sentiment evoked by consideration of the facts revealed by reason.
1st argument against rationalism
Reason: inductive or demonstrative Inductive: infers facts from observation Demonstrative: works with abstract
mathematical and logical relations. Moral judgments don’t pick out such
facts or relations Hence they are not made by reason
Example: the “crime” of ingratitude
Observable fact: ill will or indifference in the mind of the ungrateful person
This is not a moral fact because it is not always wrong
Abstract relation: contrariety of attitude
Again, this is not always wrong
2nd argument
Reason operates to infer NEW facts and relations
A moral judgment must be based on all the facts of a situation
Hence moral judgments are not made by reason
3rd argument Moral judgments are like
judgments of beauty Beauty is not a quality or feature
we discover in the object Rather, a judgment of beauty is an
expression of a favorable sentiment toward the object
Moral judgments express a similar kind of sentiment
4th argument
Non-human objects can manifest all the relations that obtain in a moral situation.
But we don’t apply morality to the non-human world
Hence morality is not a matter of relations.
5th argument
Reason alone is never a motive to action
Moral judgments can move us to action
Hence reason by itself cannot give us morality