idap briefing071409

8/14/2019 IDAP Briefing071409

1/101

Office of the President of the Philippines

PRESIDENTIAL ANTI-GRAFT COMMISSION

THE INTEGRITYDEVELOPMENT ACTION

PLAN


2/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP

PAGC-RDC IPARTNERSHI

P

REALITY CHECK

Corruption is a problem

No government is sparedfrom the sting of corruption

Corruption is one of the

biggest problems of thePhilippines since timeimmemorial

The Government is doing itspart in trying tosolve/eradicate this problem

The Government cannotsolve this problem overnightnor can it solve the problem


3/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

GOVERNMENTINITIATIVES TO FIGHT

GRAFT AND CORRUPTIONAdministrative Controls

and

Procedural ReformsIncreased funds for

anti-graft

Internal audit controlsand streamlining ofsystems

Procurement reforms


4/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

Ch 21: MTPDP 2004-2010

ANTI-CORRUPTIONAnti-corruption efforts

will focus on three areas of

reform: (1) Punitivemeasures that includeeffective enforcement of

anti-corruption laws; (2)

Preventive measures thatinclude the strengtheningof anti-corruption laws,

improvement of integrity

systems, conduct of


5/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

THE INTEGRITYDEVELOPMENT ACTION

PLANNational anti-corruptionframework of the ExecutiveBranch

Holistic approach infighting corruption

composed of 22 specific

anti-corruption measures(doables) clustered intothe strategies ofPrevention, Education,

Investigation andEnforcement (Deterrence),


6/101

The 22 Doables

Easy to implement

No requirements for additional budget

Do not requireamendments of related

laws


7/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

IDAP STRATEGIES

PREVENTION systems reformsto minimize opportunities forgraft and corruption

EDUCATION informing thepublic on the ills of corruptionthrough advocacy, valuesformation and educating thepublic servants on the dos and

donts of public serviceINVESTIGATION AND

ENFORCEMENT makingcorruption a high-risk, low-

reward activity


8/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

1. Strengthening of internal control

through the institutionalization ofinternal audit service

2. Conduct of Integrity DevelopmentReview

3. Adoption of e-NGAS and fasttracking of e-bidding

4. Incorporating integrity check inrecruitment and promotion ofgovernment personnel.

5. Institutionalization of a multi-stakeholder personnel andorganizational performanceevaluation system

6. Protection of meager income ofgovernment employees

REALITY


9/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

1) Strengthening of internalcontrols through theinstitutionalization of

internal audit unit

OUTCOME: Revival andstrengthening

of systems integrity in allagencies in the Executive

Department

REALITY


10/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

HOW CAN INTERNAL AUDIT

HELP PREVENT CORRUPTION?

Internal Auditors

Examine control procedure todetermine their adequacy andpropriety

Verify reliability and integrity of

financial and operatinginformation

Review the systems established

to ensure compliance withexisting policies, regulations,

REALITY


11/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

HOW CAN INTERNAL AUDIT

HELP PREVENT CORRUPTION?(2)

Internal Auditors

Review the means ofsafeguarding assets

Appraise the quality ofperformance in carrying out

assigned responsibilitiesReview operations orprograms to ascertain whetherthe operations or programs arebeing carried out as planned


12/101

INDICATORS:RATINGRATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENTLEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

55Audit findings are available to the public (except those concerningAudit findings are available to the public (except those concerning

national security)national security)

Impact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corruptImpact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corruptpractices and in assisting management in achieving more effectivepractices and in assisting management in achieving more effective

governance regularly assessedgovernance regularly assessed

44Random audits are carried out with reports and recommendationsRandom audits are carried out with reports and recommendations

for action provided to the head of the agencyfor action provided to the head of the agency

Appropriate follow-up action are taken on any findings as maybeAppropriate follow-up action are taken on any findings as maybe

necessarynecessary

33Internal Audit Unit already operationalizedInternal Audit Unit already operationalizedInternal Audit Unit has a manual of proceduresInternal Audit Unit has a manual of proceduresIAU has already complied with the International Standard for theIAU has already complied with the International Standard for the

Professional Practice of Internal Auditing and the Code of EthicsProfessional Practice of Internal Auditing and the Code of Ethics

promulgated by the Association of Government Internal Auditorspromulgated by the Association of Government Internal Auditors

(AGIA)(AGIA)

22Department Order already disseminated to the employeesDepartment Order already disseminated to the employees

Orientation and discussion on the Department Order heldOrientation and discussion on the Department Order held

Training of Internal AuditorsTraining of Internal Auditors

11Department Order creating the Internal Audit Unit, charter,Department Order creating the Internal Audit Unit, charter,

structure and function of which are in accordance withstructure and function of which are in accordance with

Administrative Order No. 70 and DBM Circular 2004-04, alreadyAdministrative Order No. 70 and DBM Circular 2004-04, already

approvedapproved

REALITY


13/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING THE IDAP

PAGC-RDCPARTNERSHIP

PREVENTION

1) Strengthening of internal control

through the institutionalization ofinternal audit unit

MILESTONES:

Issuance of OP MemorandumCircular No. 89

Creation of the Committee on theInstitutionalization of Internal AuditUnits

RSP per EO 366

US$300,000 WB-IDF Grant for theStrengthening of Internal AuditUnits for Effective Procurement

Monitoring and Enforcement


14/101

US$300,000 WB-IDF Grant for theStrengthening of Internal Audit Units

for Effective Procurement Monitoringand Enforcement

Development of a Quality Assurance Program

on internal auditing functions Development of a Generic Internal Audit

Manual

Operationalization of a National Training

Program for Internal Auditors Study on Certification/Accreditation of

Internal Auditors

Development of a Procurement Monitoring


15/101

Pilot Agencies:

Department ofAgriculture

Department ofTransportation andCommunication

Department of Education Department of Finance

DBM-Procurement Service Land Bank of thePhilippines

Department of theInterior and LocalGovernment

National PowerCorporation

Department of SocialWelfare and Development

Province of Bulacan

Department of Health City of Marikina

Department of PublicWorks and Hi hwa s

Municipality of Cainta

REALITY


16/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

2) Conduct of IntegrityDevelopment Review (IDR)

OUTCOME:Institutionalization

of a structured,comprehensive,systematic, and continuousassessment andimprovementin all agencies.

REALITY


17/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

WHAT IS IDR?

A preventive measureagainst corruptionthat aims to build

institutionalfoundations toprevent corruptionbefore it occurs.

Entails a systemicdiagnosis of thecorruption resistance

in place in an agency

REALITY


18/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

OBJECTIVES OF IDR

Determines the level ofintegrity developmentwithin the agency

Identifies the agencysvulnerability tocorruption

Assesses the adequacyof agencys safeguardsto forestall corruption

Prepares a CorruptionPrevention andIntegrity EnhancementPlan

Establishesbenchmarks by which
http://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://www.hccfl.edu/pollock/images/Dilbert.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.hccfl.edu/pollock/AUnix1/DisasterRecovery.htm&h=421&w=475&sz=46&tbnid=2-EhuryxWVIJ:&tbnh=111&tbnw=126&hl=tl&start=6&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dplan%2Bcartoon%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Dtl%26lr%3D


19/101

INTEGRITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FRAMEWORK

LeadershipCode of Ethics

Gifts and

Benefits

Policy

PerformanceManagement

CorruptionRiskManagement

Individual

Environment

Organizational

Whistleblowing,Internal Reporting& Investigation

Managing Interface with

External Environment

HumanResourceDevelopment

ProcurementManagement

FinancialManagement


20/101

INDICATORSRATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

5IDR findings already presented and validated with the

management/head of agency

Agency already prepared an agency anticorruption/integritydevelopment plan (Roadmap)

Impact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corrupt

practices regularly assessed

4Corruption Vulnerability Assessment already conducted which

includes:

o Preparation of a Site Visit Plan

o Process map

o Risk Assessment

o Evaluation of controls and safeguards

3Corruption Resistance Review (CRR) already conducted which

includes:

o Integrity Development Assessment (IDA)

o Survey of Employeeso Analysis of Results

2Assessors to constitute IDR team identified and trained

IDR implementation plan for the agency already prepared

1MOA among the agency, service provider and PAGC or OMB already

signed (should include the scope of the IDR and the terms of

reference, timeframe, resource and manpower requirements for theconduct of the IDR)


21/101

Agencies covered by IDR:

DOH DENRAFP NIA

BFP LRADPWH BOCLTO DND-PVAO

BUCOR PNPDAR BIRLRTA DBM-PS

REALITY


22/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

3) Fast tracking of e-NGAS and e-biddingfor the procurementof goods services and

infrastructureprojects

OUTCOME: greatertransparency, correct,

reliable, complete andtimely recording ofgovernment financialtransactions andfinancial reports


23/101

INDICATORS *e-bidding indicators subject to theguidelines yet to be released by GPPB

RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

5

Impact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corruptpractices regularly assessed

4e-NGAS in place and operational

3Concerned personnel already trained on e-NGAS

2MOA between COA (Government Accounting and FinanceManagement Information System) and the head of agency on e-NGAS

implementation already signed

Employees already oriented on the MOA

1Agency already complied with all the E-NGAS requirements which

include:

o Server System Requirements

o Workstation requirements

o People ware requirements

o Local Area Network (LAN)

o Existing System


24/101

Milestones:

E-NGAS installed in 412agencies nationwide (250NGAs, 147 LGUs, 15 GOCCs)

REALITY


25/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

4) Incorporateintegrity check inrecruitment andpromotion ofgovernmentpersonnel

OUTCOME: greaterawareness on the role ofintegrity check in thereduction of opportunities

for abuse of discretion in

REALITY


26/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

4) Incorporate integrity check in

recruitment and promotion ofgovernment personnel

Section 27, Article II(Declaration of State Policies

and Principles), 1987ConstitutionThe state shall maintain honesty and

integrity in the public service andtake positive and effective

measures against graft andcorruption

IDAP Circular No. 01-2005The components of integrity check

shall include lifestyle check and

N f A li t P iti


27/101

Name of Applicant: Position:

1. Subject states that he has been employed with your company from ________ to _____. His lastsalary was ___________. Is this correct? _____ Yes _____ No

2. What was the nature of his / her work?____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3. How would you rate his / her job performance?__________ Very Satisfactory _________Satisfactory ________ Poor

4. Why did he / she leave? _____Laid-off _________ Resigned Reason: __________________________Terminated ____________ Others Specify : ________________

5. Would you re-hire him / her? _______ Yes ______ No I

f not, why? _______________________________________________________

6. Did he lose any time because of poor health? _______ Yes ______ No

7. Would you trust him / her with money matters? ______ Yes ______ No

8. How would you rate his / her relationship with his / her:

Superior: Co-workers:

______ Very Satisfactory ______ Very Satisfactory

______ Satisfactory ______ Satisfactory

______ Poor ______ Poor

9. What is your opinion regarding his / her:

Work Attitude: _____ Positive ____ Average ____ Poor

Character : _____ Very Good ____ Good ____ Poor

Dependability: _____ Very Dependable ____ Dependable ____ Not Dependable

10. Any additional information which you feel will help us in considering him / her for theposition? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Accomplished by: ___________________ Signature : ___________________

Position: _________________________ Company: _________________________

Telephone No.: ______________________ Date accomplished : __________________

INTE

GRITY

CHECKFORM


28/101


5

Impact as to its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corrupt

practices regularly assessedResults of the review used to enhance the recruitment andpromotion process

4Performance of the personnel selection/promotion review boardregularly reviewed

3Integrity check incorporated during the recruitment and promotion

process based on the approved guidelines

2Written guidelines for the inclusion of integrity check in therecruitment and promotion process communicated to all employees

Agency has a functioning personnel selection/promotion reviewboard

HRD personnel and members of the selection/promotion reviewboard trained in conducting integrity check

1Department Order and written guidelines for the inclusion ofintegrity check in its recruitment and promotion process inaccordance with CSC guidelines approved

REALITY


29/101

REALITYCHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

5) Institutionalizemulti-stakeholderperformance

evaluation systemOUTCOME:Establishment of a

more objectiveassessment ofindividual employee

performance


30/101

Client Rater

Subordinate

Rater

Peer Rater

Self Rater

Supervisor

Rater

CROSSRATING

Percentage

Weight

360-degree evaluation process

which involves multi-raters:

Each rater is assigned

specific percentage

weight.

Institutionalize multi-stakeholder performance evaluation systemInstitutionalize multi-stakeholder performance evaluation system


31/101


5Results of the review used to promote good behavior and

performance of employees



4System for rewarding good performance and sanctioning poor

performance in place

Multi-stakeholder performance evaluation system regularly reviewedand improved

3Multi-stakeholder performance evaluation system conducted

regularly

2Orientation of the employees on the multi-stakeholder performance

evaluation system conducted

Composition of the Performance Evaluation Review Committee(PERC) already identified

1Department Order and written guidelines to implement a multi-stakeholder performance evaluation system in accordance withCSC Memorandum Circular No. 13, s. 1999 approved and

disseminated

REALITY


32/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

6) Protection of

meager incomeof employees

OUTCOME: agency

officials are morediscerning inentertaining creditschemes offered to

employees and publicservants with enoughincome to sustain atleast their basic needs

(both food and non-food to lessen the risk

REALITY


33/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION6) Protection of meager income of

employees

IndicatorSection 40 of the GeneralAppropriations Act (GAA)

states that deductions shallnot reduce the employeesmonthly net take home pay toan amount lower than P3,000

after all authorized

deductions Milestone:Executive Order No. 462 Adopting

Measures and Safety Nets to ProtectGovernment Employees, Creating

the Committee on Protection of

REALITY


34/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

6) Protection of meager income of

employees Updates:

Signed Executive Order No.641, Authorizing theEstablishment andAdministration of ProvidentFunds in the Government(dated 25 July 2007)

For approval: Leave credits as payment for

loans

Additional Special Privilege


35/101

INDICATORS


5

Impact as to its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corruptpractices regularly assessed

4Level of implementation of the Department Order and guidelinesregularly reviewed

3Amount of take-home pay of employees in accordance with the D.O.and guidelines (D.O. operationalized)

2Orientation on the Department Order and guidelines conducted

to all employees

1Department Order and written guidelines in accordance with

GAA provision on the minimum amount of take-home pay of theemployees approved and disseminated

REALITY


36/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

PREVENTION

7) Adoption of a single IDsystem for government

officials and employees

On April 19, 2006, the PhilippineSupreme Court decided withfinality that the UM-ID System isconstitutional.

Benefits of the UM-ID :

1)streamlining and harmonizing the

various ID systems and databasescan translate to millions of savingsfor the government

2)identity theft and fraudulent

claims shall be prevented

REALITY


37/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

EDUCATION

1. Dissemination of

compendium ofanticorruption laws, rulesand regulations.

2. Preparation of agency-specific code of ethicalstandards.

3. Conduct of ethics

training, spiritual formation,and moral recovery programfor agencies andstakeholders.

4. Integration of anti-

REALITYEDUCATION


38/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

EDUCATION

1) Disseminatecompendium ofanti-corruptionlaws, rules and

regulationsOUTCOME:increasedawareness of anti-corruption laws,rules andregulations amonggovernmentemployees


39/101


5



4All computers in the agency have anti-corruption laws, rules and

regulations that could be downloaded and printed

Anti-corruption laws, rules and regulations displayed in conspicuousplaces

3Orientation on anti-corruption laws, rules and regulations with the

employees conducted

2

Department Order for the compilation of anti-corruption laws,

rules and regulations (applicable to the agency) approved anddisseminated

1Research, compilation and coordination with an anti-corruption

agency like PAGC or Ombudsman done

Compiled anti-corruption laws, rules and regulations approved fordissemination

REALITYEDUCATION


40/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

EDUCATION

2) Prepare agency-

specific code ofethicalstandards/guideli

nes for adoptionOUTCOME: strictadherence of

employees to anagency-specificcode of ethicalstandards

REALITYEDUCATION


41/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

EDUCATION

Promoting the Formulation andEnforcement of Code of Conductby Government Agencies in thePhilippines (July November 2008)

aims to promote the developmentand implementation of codes ofconduct in the Philippines to

improve the integrity of the publicsector.

intended outcome is to reduce theincidence of corruption at the

department/ agency/ bureau/

PAGC PROJECT ON THE CODE OFCONDUCT

Agencies covered by the


42/101

Agencies covered by theproject:ASSESSMENT &

IMPROVEMENT OF

EXISTING CODES OFCONDUCT

DEVELOPMENT OFAGENCY CODE OF

CONDUCT

BOC DA

DPWH DENR

DOH PDEA

BI DepED

NLRC DILG

DSWD NIA

DFA

PAGC


43/101

What should be consideredin the code?A. Policy Environment

1. Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA 3019), Approved on

17 August 1960

2. Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials

and Employees (R.A. 6713), Approved on 20 February 19893. Article XI Accountability of Public Officers, Sections 1 and 2,

The 1987 Constitution

A. The Code of Conduct

a. Purpose and Scope

b. Elements and Featuresc. Form, Style, and Content

d. Drafting the Code


44/101


45/101

What should be consideredin the code?E. Head of Agency

1. Chief Executive Job Description

2. Chief Executive Performance Evaluation Policy

3. Executive Compensation Policy

4. Executive Transition Policy

F. Finance and Investments

1. Budgeting Policy

2. Capital Expenditures Policy

3. Financial Controls Policy

4. Investments Policy

5. Financial Audits Policy

6. Risk Management Policy

G. Customer Relations

1. Gift Acceptance Policy

2. Complaints Handling Policy


46/101

What should be consideredin the code?H. Personnel

1. Responsibility for Human Resource Policy

2. Equal Employment Opportunity Policy

3. Nepotism Policy

4. Sexual Harassment Policy5. Workplace Environment Policy

6. Complaints Policy

7. Performance Review Policy

I. Communications

1. Media Relations Policy2. Crisis Communications Policy

3. Electronic Media Policy

4. Political Activity Policy


47/101

What should be consideredin the code?

J. Committees

1. Governance Committee Policy

2. Financial Committees: Finance, Auditand Investment Policy

3. Development Committee Policy

4. Executive Committee Policy

5. Management Committee Policy

INDICATORS


48/101


5The agency code of ethical standards regularly reviewed for

effectiveness in specifying and promoting desired behavior of

employees

The code of ethical standards integrated in all operating systems ofthe agency (e.g. human resource management, procurement)

Impact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corruptpractices regularly assessed

4Employees record of adherence to or violation of the agency code of

ethical standards used as one of the considerations for promotion

Rewards given to officials and employees who consistently exhibit

behavior consistent with the agency code of ethical standards

3Agency-specific code of ethical standards consistently enforced, with

managers having clear tasks of promoting and monitoringcompliance

Applicable provisions of the code of ethical standards included in

contracts with external parties (e.g. suppliers)

2Agency-specific code of ethical standards and reward and sanctionguidelines approved and disseminated

Employees oriented and made to sign a sworn commitment tocomply with the code of ethical standards

1Department Order creating an agency-specific code of ethical

standards consistent with RA 6713 approved and disseminated

REALITYCHECK EDUCATION


49/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

EDUCATION

3) Provide ethicstraining, spiritualformation, moral

recovery program

OUTCOME:Government

employees withrenewed sense ofidealism


50/101

REALITYCHECK EDUCATION


51/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

EDUCATION

4) Mandate

integration of anti-corruption inelementary andsecondaryeducation modules

- For DepEd only

Corruption PreventionTeaching Exemplars

Affirm theindispensability ofvalues educationprograms that focus on

building personal

REALITYCHECK INVESTIGATION AND


52/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

INVESTIGATION ANDENFORCEMENT1. Development of agency Internal

Complaint Unit.

2. Setting up/strengthening ofagency Internal Affairs Unit.

3. Publication of blacklistedoffenders and on-line databasefor public access.

4. Holding superiors accountablefor corrupt activities ofsubordinates.

5. Advocacy for the submission of

Income Tax Returns asattachment to the SALN.

6. Effective use of existing agencyadministrative disciplinarymachinery and publication of

results

REALITYCHECK INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT


53/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT

1) Develop agencyInternalComplaint Unit(including

protection ofwhistleblowers)

\

OUTCOME:Increase number ofinformants willingto come out and

expose graft and



54/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT

1) Develop agency Internal Complaint

Unit (including protection ofwhistleblowers)

Internal Complaints

Unit receive all complaints accountable for ensuring

that proper documentation

is effected, sources areprotected and initialscreening is done

acts on complaints involving

violation/s of the

INDICATORS


55/101

INDICATORS


5

The agency regularly assesses whether the internal reporting system being used

is an effective mechanism to prevent corrupt practicesResults of the assessment used to improve and enhance the internal reportingprocess

4The agency protects and rewards employees who report corrupt behavior

3The agency has an internal reporting system which follows a standard processing

time and specifies roles and responsibilities for accepting reports and givingadvice to employees who want to report corruption

The agency records steps taken on complaints and provide feedback tocomplainants

Coordination with Internal Affairs Unit on-going

2

Employees oriented on the procedures for reporting corrupt incidents

Relevant personnel trained on the handling of complaints and reports ofcorruption

1Department Order creating ICU and guidelines (which specify what

constitutes corrupt and unethical behavior and the responsibilities forreporting) approved and disseminated



56/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

2) Set-up/strengtheninternal affairs

unit

OUTCOME:Stronger

investigativecapability withinthe agency and

faster resolution



57/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

2) Set-up/strengthen internal affairs unit

Internal Affairs Unit

Act and investigate

complaints involvingviolations of the Code ofConduct and Anti-Graft

Law May conduct motu

proprio investigation

INDICATORS


58/101


5

The agency regularly assesses whether the investigation system

being used is an effective mechanism to prevent corrupt practicesResults of the assessment used to improve and enhance the

investigation process

4Coordination with other anti-corruption body (e.g. PAGC and OMB)on-going

The agency imposes appropriate sanctions to erring employees andofficials

3The agency has an investigation system which follows a standard

processing time and specifies roles and responsibilities forconducting investigations

2The agency regularly disseminates information on the disposition of

cases

Relevant personnel trained on investigation

1Department Order creating IAU and guidelines approved and

disseminated



59/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

3) Publish blacklistedoffenders andmaintain on-line

central databaseOUTCOME:Greater

perception ofcorruption being ahigh-risk, low-reward activity



60/101

CHECK

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

IDAP CIRCULAR NO. 01 2005

For blacklisting: A supplier who violatedthe Procurement Law

Employees who are foundguilty of violations andwhose sanction involvesdismissal with perpetual

disqualification frompublic office

this measure shall onlyapply to cases whose

decisions are final and

INDICATORS


61/101

INDICATORS


5Impact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corrupt

practices regularly assessedResults of the assessment used to improve or modify the measure

4Policies on blacklisting regularly reviewed and improved

3Blacklisted offenders published in agency publication, in the website

and made available to the public

2

Employee orientation on the publishing of blacklisted offenders held

1Department Order and guidelines (with consideration on thelegal implications) directing the publish of blacklisted offendersapproved and disseminated


62/101


63/101

PAGC(no. of officials ordered to be penalized)

500+%

75

538%


64/101

Undersecretary (DPWH), Dep Dir Gen (TESDA), Asst Secretaries (OP,ATO, DND, DSWD, DOST), Chairman of the Board (LWUA), BoardMembers (NTA, PEA, NBDB), Presidents (State University, PNOC, PADC),Chairman (PEA, KWF, PHILRACOM, PRC), Commissioners (BI, PCUP,NLRC), Asst Commissioner (SEC), Administrators (NTA, NIA, CDA, IA,

FIDA, NDA, MWSS, LWUA, NIA), Dep Administrator (NTA), Gen Managers(PEA, DFP, LLDA), Asst Gen Manager (PEA), Dep Gen Manger (PEA),Regional Directors (DECS, TESDA, DA, LTO, BIR, DPWH, NCIP, DPWH,DSWD, NBI, BIR, CHED), Executive Directors (DOF, OSCC, LCP, NWRB),Deputy Executive Directors (CHED, TESDA), Directors (CHED, DA, DBM,PHILVOCS, DOST, DOH, NCC, DPWH, NPO, OPA, EMB, TESDA, DSWD),Deputy Director (DOST), Regional Directors (BLGF, DOLE, DAR, DEPED,DTI), Assistant Regional Directors (DA, DSWD, DTI), Provincial Director(DTI), Customs Collector, Prosecutors, Regional Adjudicators, AssistantProsecutors, Labor Arbiter (NLRC), Senior Corporate Attorney (PEA),Attorney (POEA, TESDA), Chief Administrative Officer (TESDA),

Accountant II (CHED), Schools Division Superintendent

34 presidential appointees:



65/101

THE FIGHTAGAINSTGRAFT AND

CORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING THE IDAP

PAGC-RDC IPARTNERSHIP

4) Hold superiorsaccountable forcorrupt activitiesof subordinates

OUTCOME:Superiors areconscientious inpreventing corruptactivities of theirsubordinates



66/101

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

4) Hold superiors accountable for corrupt activities ofsubordinates

IDAP Circular No. 02-2006, re: Legal baseson Command Responsibility

The rules governing the liability of public officersin general as laid down in Sec. 38, Chapter 9,Book I of the Administrative Code of 1987,to wit;

A public officer shall not be civilly liable foracts done in the performance of his officialduties unless there is a clear showing of badfaith, malice or gross negligence.

Any public officer who, without just cause,neglects to perform a duty within a fixed

period by law or regulation, or within areasonable period if none is fixed, shall beliable for damages to the private partyconcerned without prejudice to such otherliability as may be prescribed by law.

A head of a department or a superior officershall not be civilly liable for the wrongful acts,

omissions of duty, negligence, or misfeasanceof his subordinates, unless he has actually



67/101

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

4) Hold superiors accountable for corruptactivities of subordinates

Mechem (Cruz, Liability of PublicOfficers 2003 Edition) noted severalexceptions and suggests that thesuperior officer may be held liable: where, being charged with the duty of

employing or retaining his subordinates,

he negligently or willfully employs orretains unfit or improper persons;

where, being charged with the duty tosee that they are appointed and qualifiedin a proper manner, he negligently orwillfully fails to require of them the due

conformity to the prescribed regulations; where he so carelessly or negligently

oversees, conducts or carries on thebusiness of his office as to furnish theopportunity for the default; and,

a fortiori where he has directed,authorized or cooperated in the wrong.

INDICATORS


68/101

INDICATORS


5Guidelines and rules of procedures regularly reviewed and

improvedImpact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corrupt


Results of the assessment used to improve or enhance the measure

4

Superiors are held accountable/sanctioned for corrupt activities oftheir subordinates in accordance with the guidelines

3System in holding superiors accountable for corrupt activitiesof subordinates in place and operational

2Employees and heads oriented on the doctrine of command

responsibility

1Department Order holding superiors accountable for corruptactivities of subordinates and guidelines in accordance withE.O. 292 approved and disseminated



69/101

THE FIGHTAGAINST

GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

5) Advocate for the

submission ofITR asattachment tothe SALN

OUTCOME:increasedtransparency of

the income andnet worth ofgovernmentemployees

INDICATORS


70/101

INDICATORS


5

Copies of the ITRs as attachment to the SALN of presidentialappointees submitted for PAGC datebase



4The agency rewards employees who attached their ITR to their SALN

3ITRs of personnel with other sources of income attached to their

SALN

2Employee orientation on the relevance of attaching the ITR to

the SALN held

1Department Order advocating submission of ITR as attachment to the

SALN



71/101

THE FIGHTAGAINSTGRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

6) Use effectivelyexisting agencyadministrativedisciplinary

machinery andpublish results

OUTCOME: Greater

adherence to and amore proactiveimplementation ofthe administrative

disciplinary

INDICATORS


72/101

INDICATORS


5Impact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corrupt


4Existing agency administrative disciplinary machinery regularly

reviewed and improved

3Reports on the implementation of existing agencyadministrative disciplinary machinery regularly submitted to theagency head

2

Orientation/reorientation of employees on existing agency

administrative disciplinary machinery conducted

1Department Order reinforcing the use of existing agency

administrative disciplinary machinery approved anddisseminated


73/101

REALITYCHECK ANTI-CORRUPTION SCORECARD


74/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTINGTHE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP

PAGC-PMAPARTNERSHIP

ANTI-CORRUPTION SCORECARD(ACS)

aims to assess the impact or

effectiveness of existing anti-corruption reforms, with specialfocus on the IDAP (results-focused).

adopts a holistic approach inassessment that includes thefollowing assessors/respondents:

Accountable persons (persons in-charge of implementing the IDAPmeasures)

Select rank and file employees of theagency being assessed

Stakeholders (Government and Non-

REALITYCHECK STRATEGIC


75/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

STRATEGICPARTNERSHIP

1. Linking of databases of

complementary agenciesand sharing of information.

2. Enhancement of the privatesector and civil societyparticipation in variousareas of governance.

3. Tapping of international

development agencies andprivate sector for support.

4. Institutionalization of theparticipation of

stakeholders in agency

REALITYCHECK STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP


76/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORINGTHE IDAP


P

1) Linking ofexistingdatabases ofcomplementaryagencies andsharing of

informationOUTCOME: Greatersharing ofinformation and

increasedevidences ofcollaborativeundertakingsamong agencies in

education,

INDICATORS


77/101

INDICATORS


5Impact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corruptpractices regularly assessed

4Report on the utilization of the information shared

Linking of existing databases to complementary agencies regularly

reviewed and improved

3Sharing of databases and information between/among agencies on-

going

2Employee orientation on sharing of information with otheragencies conducted

1Department Order and guidelines on sharing of information

approved and disseminated



78/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P

2) Enlist or

enhanceparticipation ofprivate sector

and civil societyin various areasof governance

OUTCOME: Greatervigilance andstrategicinvestments in

various forms by

INDICATORS


79/101


5

Regular review and study of the involvement of private sector

and civil society conductedResults of the review used to improve partnership

Impact regularly assessed if it is an effective mechanism toprevent corrupt practices

4Operational process where inputs from private sector and civilsociety are taken into consideration--in place

3Private sector and civil society involved in various agency-

activities related to the promotion of good governance

2Employee orientation on the signed MOA conducted

1MOA (with guidelines specifying the extent of participation)formalizing private sector and civil society participationsigned/approved and disseminated



80/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P

3) Tap internationaldevelopmentagencies andprivate sector for

support

OUTCOME: Greaterexternal resources

mobilized andimproved perceptionon the resolve tofight graft and

INDICATORS


81/101


5Partnerships with various partner agencies and the private sector

assessed as regards effectiveness in attaining agency goals.

New donors support agency activities

4Process of implementation of each project reviewed and evaluated

for improvement

Monitoring system in place and operational

3Employees oriented on the agreement/s with partner agenciesApproval and implementation of the project

2Project proposal submitted for approval

Official communication from partner agencies and private sector

signifying approval of request for support for particularprojects/activities released (e.g. Grant or CooperativeAgreements)

1Areas requiring support and possible providers of the support fromthe international community identified



82/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P

4) Institutionalizestakeholderparticipation

OUTCOME:Greaterinvolvement by

thestakeholdersguided by the

principles of

INDICATORS


83/101


5Regular review and study of the involvement of stakeholder

conductedResults of the review used to improve partnership

4Feed back mechanism where stakeholder inputs are taken into

consideration in place and operational

3Stakeholder participates in various agency-activities

2Employee orientation on the signed MOA conducted

1MOA (with guidelines specifying the extent of participation)formalizing stakeholder participation signed/approved anddisseminated (e.g. Employees Union)

REALITYCHECK

IMPLEMENTING THE IDAP


84/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P

IMPLEMENTING THE IDAP

There are 156 IDAP-covered governmentAgencies in the Executive Branch

DepartmentsBureausAttached Agencies

Regional OfficesGOCCGFI

What is the goal of PAGC?Ensure that ALL agenciesin the Executive Branch areimplementing the IDAP

REALITYCHECK

5 STEPS IN IMPLEMENTING THE


85/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P

5 STEPS IN IMPLEMENTING THEIDAP

Step 1. Create an IDAP

CommitteeIdentify

the Head,the

members

Values?

Integrity?

Commitment?

Dedication?

Proactive?

Definefunctions,

responsibilities,accountabilities

clear?

specific?

doable?

Make itofficial

To getcommitment ofagency head

Toinstitutionalize

itTo streamlinetheimplementationof all anti-corruptionprograms

REALITYCHECK



86/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P


Step 2. Prepare your IDAPplan of action

What are the measures

already in place?

That can be set upimmediately?

That need intensive staffwork beforeimplementation?

* Based on the IDAP indicators

REALITYCHECK



87/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P


Step 3. Prepare your IDAPwork program

Set targets

Plan specific activities vis--vis accountable person

Identify assistanceneeded

(if any)

IDAP WORK PROGRAM FORM


88/101

IDAP WORK PROGRAM FORM

IDAPMEASURE

ACTIVITIES OUTPUT/MOV TARGETDATE ACCOUNTABLE

PERSON

ISSUES/CONCERN/PROBLEM

DESCRIPTION

ACTIONTO BETAKEN

REALITYCHECK



89/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P

IDAPStep 4. Regularly monitor

and assess yourimplementation

Regular meeting of IDAPCommittee members

- What are the next steps?

Regular evaluation- are activities done asscheduled?

- are the strategies forimplementation effective?- are the accomplishmentsindicators of efficiency or

effectiveness?

REALITYCHECK



90/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P

IDAP

Step 5. Reportaccomplishments

Agency Head

PAGC

Media

REALITYCHECK MONITORING AND REPORTING THE


91/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P

IDAP

IDAP Progress Report

Measures (Doables)

Action taken

Means of Verification

Remarks

IDAP PROGRESS REPORT FORMIDAP PROGRESS REPORT FORM

PreventionPrevention


92/101

AGENCY NAME:AGENCY NAME:

IDAP PROGRESS REPORTIDAP PROGRESS REPORT

As of ____________ 2007As of ____________ 2007

IDAP MEASURE IDAP MEASURE PREVENTIONPREVENTION

STATUS / ACTION TAKEN AS OFSTATUS / ACTION TAKEN AS OFABOVE DATEABOVE DATE

MEANS OFMEANS OFVERIFICATIONVERIFICATION

REMARKS*REMARKS*

11 Strengthen internal controlStrengthen internal controlthroughthroughinstitutionalization ofinstitutionalization ofInternal Audit UnitInternal Audit Unit

22 Conduct of IntegrityConduct of IntegrityDevelopment ReviewDevelopment Review

33 Fast-tract e-NGAS and e-Fast-tract e-NGAS and e-bidding for thebidding for theprocurement of goodsprocurement of goods& services& services

Prepared by:Prepared by:

Reviewed by:Reviewed by: Approved by:Approved by:

REALITYCHECK MONITORING AND REPORTING THE


93/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P

IDAP

IDAP Rating Report

Measures (Doables)

Agency self-assessment

Remember:1) Use the set of IDAP

indicators (5-pt level ofachievement) as basis.

2) Lower level indicators arepre-requisites of higher levelindicators

3) All the requirements of a

particular level should be

SAMPLE SET OF INDICATORS, re: Code ofConductRATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT


94/101

ConductRATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

5The agency code of ethical standards regularly reviewed foreffectiveness in specifying and promoting desired behavior of

employees

The code of ethical standards integrated in all operating systems of theagency (e.g. human resource management, procurement)



4Employees record of adherence to or violation of the agency code ofethical standards used as one of the considerations for promotion

Rewards given to officials and employees who consistently exhibitbehavior consistent with the agency code of ethical standards

3Agency-specific code of ethical standards consistently enforced, with

managers having clear tasks of promoting and monitoring compliance

Applicable provisions of the code of ethical standards included in

contracts with external parties (e.g. suppliers)

2

Agency-specific code of ethical standards and reward and sanctionguidelines approved and disseminated

Employees oriented and made to sign a sworn commitment to complywith the code of ethical standards

1Department Order creating an agency-specific code of ethical

standards consistent with RA 6713 approved and disseminated

AGENCY NAMEAGENCY NAME


95/101

IDAP RATING REPORTIDAP RATING REPORTAS OF ________________________AS OF ________________________

IDAP MEASURE - PREVENTIONIDAP MEASURE - PREVENTION RATINRATINGG

IDAP MEASURE - DETERRENCEIDAP MEASURE - DETERRENCE RATINRATINGG

11Strengthen internal control throughStrengthen internal control throughinstitutionalization of Internal Audit Unitinstitutionalization of Internal Audit Unit

11Develop agency internal complaint unitDevelop agency internal complaint unit(including protection of internal(including protection of internalwhistleblowers)whistleblowers)

22Conduct of Integrity Development ReviewConduct of Integrity Development Review 22Set-up/strengthen agency internal affairs unitSet-up/strengthen agency internal affairs unit

(cooperate w/ PAGC &OMB in the proactive(cooperate w/ PAGC &OMB in the proactiveconduct of lifestyle checks)conduct of lifestyle checks)

33Fast-track e-NNGAS and e-bidding for theFast-track e-NNGAS and e-bidding for theprocurement of goods & servicesprocurement of goods & services

33Publish blacklisted offenders & maintain on-Publish blacklisted offenders & maintain on-line central database for public accessline central database for public access

44Incorporate integrity check in recruitment &Incorporate integrity check in recruitment &promotion of government personnelpromotion of government personnel

44Hold superiors accountable for corruptHold superiors accountable for corruptactivities of subordinatesactivities of subordinates

55Institutionalize multi-stakeholder personnel &Institutionalize multi-stakeholder personnel &organizational performance evaluation systemorganizational performance evaluation system 55Advocate for the submission of ITR asAdvocate for the submission of ITR asattachment to the SALNattachment to the SALN

66Protect the meager income of governmentProtect the meager income of governmentemployeesemployees

66Use effectively existing agency administrativeUse effectively existing agency administrativedisciplinary machinery and publish resultsdisciplinary machinery and publish results

77Adopt single ID system for governmentAdopt single ID system for governmentofficials & employeesofficials & employees

77PAGC to carry out independent survey toPAGC to carry out independent survey tocheck anti-graft and corruption programcheck anti-graft and corruption programeffectivenesseffectiveness

REALITYCHECK HOW TO GET THE AVERAGE


96/101


THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P

RATING?P1 n/a

+ P2 3P3 2

P4 3

P5 4

P6 3

P7 2________

= 17 = 2.83(average

6rating for

Prevention)

Prevention (P) 2.83

+ Deterrence (D) 3.00Education (E) 4.20

Strategic

Partnership (SP) 3.00

= 13.03

4

= 3.26

(average rating

of the agency)

PAGC COMMITMENTS

REALITYCHECK


97/101

PAGC COMMITMENTSTHE FIGHTAGAINSTGRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTINGTHE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP

PAGC-RDC IPARTNERSHIP

Mentor LocalGovernment Units ofRegion I in IDAP

implementation

Ensure that all concerns

related to the promotionof good governanceraised by the Local

Government Units of

PAGC REQUESTSREALITYCHECK


98/101

PAGC REQUESTSTHE FIGHTAGAINSTGRAFT ANDCORRUPTION

THE IDAP

IMPLEMENTIN

G THE IDAP

MONITORING

THE IDAP


P

Adoption of the IDAP byLocal Government Unitsof Region I

Reporting of observedirregularities

Support to all anti-corruptionactivities

IDAP IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOUTO


99/101

TO

Be able to WALK THE TALK

Be an ACTIVE PARTICIPANT rather thana mere spectator of a positive revolution

Start making a DIFFERENCE rather thanexpecting others to take the lead

Serve like CANDLES in the dark


100/101

POLITICAL WILL

For our fightagainst

corruption - thehardest battle of

our lives...May we get

inspiration from

the story ofDavid andGoliath


101/101

PRESIDENTIAL ANTI-GRAFT COMMISSION

ADDRESS: SAAC Building Commonwealth AvenueDiliman, Quezon City

TEL. NO.: 924 1311/ 924 1312FAX NO.: 925 8928

SMS NO.: 0917 TXT PAGC898 7242

E-MAIL: [email protected]

WEBSITE: www.pagc.gov.ph

idap briefing071409

Documents