ict for effective water management system: a case study on hyderabad metropolitan water board and...
DESCRIPTION
. Cities are suffering resource constraints in energy supply, road capacity, water reserve and even clean air for their citizens to breathe. New solutions are urgently required to cope with these resource challenges and technology in general and ICT in particular will play a big role in it.Mr Reddy in this presentation shares a case study on how Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Board and Sewage Management is undertaking efficient and effective steps that can be replicated by other citiesTRANSCRIPT
EFFECTIVE REVENUE BILLING AND
COLLECTION SYSTEM(PPP MODEL)
(100% cost recovery)
22nd June , 2011,
HMWSSB
-K. Ashok ReddyExecutive Director
Water Supply Sewerage
Water Works Department,Govt. of Andhra Pradesh
Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad
Hyderabad Metropolitan
Water Supply and Sewerage Board
1987
1 November 1989
Transferred with staff
HMWSSB-Evolution
Constituted on 1 Nov 1989
under the Hyderabad
Metropolitan Water Supply
& Sewerage Act 1989
HMWSSB
Services of
Hyderabad Metro Water Supply and Sewerage Board
(HMWSSB)
Supply potable drinking water
Sewage disposal & treatment
Planning, Designing and execution of water supply and sewerage works
HMWSSB
SERVICE AREA - 688.20 Sq.kms
Erstwhile MCH area - 169.30 Sq.kms
Peripheral & adj. Municipal areas - 518.90 Sq.Kms
MCH & Peripheral Areas
HMWSSB At a Glance
SNAP SHOT DETAILS OF WATER SUPPLY
Population served : 85.00 Lakhs Total Quantity Available : 340 MGD No of Connections : 7.43 Lakhs
(5.83 + 1.60) Monthly Revenue : Rs.32 Crores Total No of Employees : 5300
Length of Raw Water Mains : 84 Km
Length of Treated Water Mains : 318 Km
Length of Distribution Network/ : 3500 Km
Pipe material : RCC/CI/DI/PSC/MS
Installed Capacity of
Treatment System : 1568 Mld
HMWSSB
SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLYThe main surface sources of water supply for the city from five impoundments on the four rivers:
Osmansagar on River Musi
Himayatsagar on River Esi
Manjira Barrage & Singur Dam on River Manjira
Nagarjunasagar on River Krishna
Source Name River Year
Distance
from city
“Km”
Capacity
Drawls
( Mgd)Installed
(Mgd)
Storag
e
(TMC)
Osmansagar Musi 192015
(Gravity)
27 3.90 18
Himayatsagar Esi 19279.6
(Gravity)
18 2.967 17
Manjira –
Phase I & IIManjira
1965 &
1981
58
(Pumping)
45
(15+30)1.500
45
Manjira –
Phase III & IVManjira
1991 &
1994
80
(Pumping)
75
(37 + 38)30.00
75
Krishna Ph-I Krishna 2004/05
116
(Pumping /
Gravity)
90
1.50
90
Krishna Ph-II Krishna 2006-08
116
(Pumping /
Gravity)
90
90
Total 346 39.816 338
OSMANSAGAR
HIMAYATSAGAR
MANJIRA
SINGURKDWSP Phase-I & II
6
DEMAND Vs SUPPLY (in MGD)
78 87119 130
405430
588
650
335 335 335 335
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2009 2011 2021 2031
Horizon Years
Su
pp
ly in
MG
D
Population (Lakhs) Demand (Mgd) Supply (Mgd)
7
IT Applications Status
S.No Name of Module Status Purpose
1 Single Window Cell Working New connections Management
2 Revenue Billing System Working Revenue, Billing & Collection
3 Metro Customer Care Working Customer Complaints handling
4 Automatic Vehicle Tracing
System
Working Tracing the trips of water tanker
5 Online Billing& Collection
System
Working Billing & collection through epos
6 Water Quality Monitoring
System
Working Pollution samples entry and monitoring
7 SCADA System Working Water audit, accountability and monitoring
reservoir levels, flow and chlorine levels
8 SMS alerts to customers Working Bill, collection, Payment reminder SMS
alerts to Customers
9 Inventory management
System
working Stores management
10 Tankers collection
automation
working Tankers accountability
11. Pay Role working Pay role for all employees
CASE STUDY OF HMWSSB
100 % Cost Recovery
Initiation
Demand Vs Collection
167.1
8
200.9
7
225.9
271.7
4
326.4
4
393.1
1
410
378.6
338.27
240.31
231.45
215.96
171.33
161.4
7
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Finincial Year
Rs
in
Cro
res
Demand Collection
Collection
167.18
200.97
225.9
271.74
326.44
393.11
161.47
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Finincial Year
Rs in
Cro
res
Collection
2010-11
Financial Year Average
Monthly
Demand
Average
Monthly
Collection
2005-06 20.25 18.70
2006-07 23.91 20.85
2007-08 26.60 24.21
2008-09 28.84 23.29
2009-10 31.92 27.23
2010-11 34.86 31.00
Average Demand Vs Collection in the Year 2005 to Mar 2011
Docket Wise - Quality of Billing
D
iv Sec Docket Meter Reader
CAN
s
Bille
d
UnBille
d
Non-
working
(from last
month)
Non-
workin
g (New)
Mete
r
Fixed
Metere
d
Hous
e
Lock
ed
Un-
metered
6 611 0611-D01 M. Dhan Singh 1887 1879 8 340 3 0 0 1 1535
6 611 0611-D02 Bhavani & Co 1413 1344 69 37 1 0 0 89 1217
6 611 0611-D03 K.Srinivas 816 773 43 136 40 1 352 230 14
6 611 0611-D04 Hema Reddy 1454 1172 282 230 18 0 444 470 10
6 611 0611-D05 Bhavani & Co 1190 1103 87 88 11 6 610 386 2
6 611 0611-D06 Bhavani & Co 934 924 10 110 46 2 434 329 3
6 611 0611-D07 Bhavani & Co 993 960 33 121 15 0 335 486 3
6 611 0611-D08 Bhavani & Co 1039 844 195 159 25 6 465 170 19
9726 8999 727 1221 159 15 2640 2161 2803
Pipe Size and Meter Status Wise Billing Analysis
DIV SECTION SECT Pipe Size (mm)
METER
STATUS No of CANs
Average Charged
Qnty (KL)
6 JUBILEE HILLS 0611 15 L 1437 51.28
6 JUBILEE HILLS 0611 15 M 2573 96.90
6 JUBILEE HILLS 0611 15 R 1386 28.22
6 JUBILEE HILLS 0611 15 U 2938 13.91
6 JUBILEE HILLS 0611 20 L 208 114.46
6 JUBILEE HILLS 0611 20 M 694 162.08
6 JUBILEE HILLS 0611 20 R 207 60.83
6 JUBILEE HILLS 0611 20 U 12 36.42
6 JUBILEE HILLS 0611 25 M 62 110.74
6 JUBILEE HILLS 0611 25 R 15 46.53
Revenue Billing system
• Historical Background – Erstwhile Water
Works Department.
• Deficiencies in the Old System.
• Introduction of New System i.e. ERP –
Impact and improvements.
Erstwhile Water Works Department
• Tariff determined by the Government and heavily subsidized.
• No relevance to cost recovery.
• Deficits financed by the Government through non-plan grants.
• No setting of targets for raising demands and collection.
• No monitoring of demands and collections.
Cont…
• No performance evaluation of Meter Readers
• Manual maintenance of customer ledgers, issuing of Bills and receipts
• Tampering of records and delayed action on misappropriations/manipulations
• No follow up of arrears
• No analysis of any data for taking corrective action
Cont…
• Periodical review of arrears and matter
taken up with Government for additional
budgetary allocation to various.
• departments for clearing the dues.
• Drastic improvement in the collection
efficiency.
Innovative Initiative steps taken by HMWSSB
as a part of Management Development
concepts
Significant achievements are as follows:
• Restructured the Organization staffing
pattern on scientific basis
• Rationalization and simplification of tariff
structure
Cont…
• Identified training needs for all levels of
personnel and drawn a comprehensive
training action plan.
– Orientation module implemented for all
categories of employees including literacy
programme.
– Core Module partly implemented, balance
underway.
Reasons for poor cost recovery
Poor database maintenance.
Poor willingness to charge
Poor willingness to pay.
No scientific analysis.
No monitoring between supply of water and
revenue generation.
Can we afford to have the status quo?
Increasing pressure on infrastructure
Service demands of growing population
Deteriorating financial position
Need to tap capital markets for funds
Insufficient resource mobilization / utilization
Lack of information access /evaluation
Self-reliance & self-governance
Revenue MIS
Analysis of nearly 725 thousand customer accounts is possible and is beingdone
Gives the management information on which division/section is slacking in
Bill generation
Collection
Never paid cases
No of customers paying and
A host of other information which otherwise is not possible obtain manually
Meter reader performance (every transaction) online & offline
Performance Reports
www.hyderabadwater.gov.in
Introducing of AMR (Automatic Meter Reading)
www.hyderabadwater.gov.in
Upgradation and Introduction of ERP
computerized Revenue Billing System
• Consultants appointed for ERP software
development including advise on hardware
configuration.
• All collection counters are fully on-line (46
counters)
• By creating dockets, monitoring becomes
simple and effective at meter reader level.
Cont…
• The new Computerized billing system focuses
on MIS for taking corrective steps for eg.
– Meter Reader performance : to review coverage
and working meters in the areas covered by each
Meter Reader
– Water consumption : based on consumption
recorded in the bill; this would be reconciled with
bulk meters once linking is complete.
Cont…
– Based on water reconciliation facilitates
identification of areas of maximum UFW
– Meter status : working & non-working meter
analysis
– Collection efficiency & analysis of outstanding
– Billing and collection pattern
– Both billing & collection with the same
machine( Off-line & On-line)
Extent of Non-revenue
Water
Quantity of Water Billed
MonthBilled
Can‟s
Daily
Consumed
Qty. (LKL)
Daily
Consumed
Qty (MGD)
Daily
Charged Qty
(LKL)
Daily Qty
(MGD)
November – 2010 722967 6.1269 134.79 6.90 151.86
December - 2010 721511 6.20 136.57 6.85 150.52
January - 2011 724622 6.58 144.70 7.28 160.36
Let us take up strategies
Why should we have a strategy
To have clarity of thought
To have clarity on process
To have clarity on goals
To have clarity on outcomes
What are the strategies
Balancing Income Vs Expenditure
Mobilize resources for Capital works
Mobilize resources for ageing assets
Tap capital markets
Improve credit worthiness
Improve service levels
Balancing Income Vs Expenditure
Income
Increase resource base ( No. of people
paying tax)
Identifying additional avenues of income
Levy of full user charges
Periodical increase in tariff to meet
incremental expenditure
Improve service levels
Ensure reliability of service
Ensure quality of service
Ensure value for money
Create demand
Set-up bench marks
Adopt best practices
….. all these lead to higher willingness to pay
Planning for a better billing system )
Sound Metering system
Replace unused & inaccurate meters
100% metering
Bulk flow meters for reconciliation
Computerization
Procurement of Hardware and software
Conversion of manual ledgers to
computer media
Operational training
Planning for a better billing system
Resource Planning
Organize meter readers and inspectors
Meter Reader‟s Plan, built in checks for
readings
MIS
Continuous monitoring using statistical
data
Interventions
Computerized Revenue MIS
Daily Reviews
Section / Docket wise Targets for revenueCollection
Never paid cases – incentives
OTS & VDCS
„Pajaa vani‟ Program
Conclusions - specific to billing
• Fix quality meters for accurate reading -increase consumer confidence
• Provide built in checks with the system for cross verification of readings
• Reduce or eliminate collusion
• Use statistical data for analysis and diagnose the problematic areas