icao colloquium on aviation and climate change · 4primary results based on icao fesg central...

15
ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change and Climate Change Aviation and Climate Change Aviation and Climate Change Session Two – Aviation Emissions Quantification and MRV 12 May 2010 12 May 2010 “ICAO CAEP Modelling and Databases Task Force, ICAO Goals Assessment Results” Gregg Fleming (US DoT, Volpe) – Co-Rapp Urs Ziegler (FOCA) – Co-Rapp Chris Eyers (QinetiQ) – Secretary

Upload: others

Post on 29-May-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate ChangeICAO Colloquium on Aviation 

and Climate ChangeICAO Colloquium on 

Aviation and Climate ChangeICAO Colloquium on 

Aviation and Climate Changeand Climate ChangeAviation and Climate ChangeAviation and Climate Change

Session Two –Aviation Emissions Quantification and MRV

12 May 201012 May 2010

“ICAO CAEP Modelling and Databases Task Force,ICAO Goals Assessment Results”

Gregg Fleming (US DoT, Volpe) – Co-Rapp

Urs Ziegler (FOCA) – Co-Rapp

Chris Eyers (QinetiQ) – Secretaryy (Q Q) y

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

Contents of PresentationContents of Presentation

Introduction

Background

Results• Noise (Not Shown)• NOx and PM Below 3,000 ft (Not Shown)

b f• NOx Above 3,000 ft• Fuel Burn and Commercial Aircraft System Fuel

Efficiency (CASFE) Full-Flighty ( ) g

Putting the Results in Context

Summary

February 2010 2

y

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

IntroductionIntroduction

Results present the consensus view of MODTF, and p ,are consistent across multiple models

Primary results based on ICAO FESG central forecast of aviation demand with some comparisons with of aviation demand, with some comparisons with low-demand case

Supporting reports document goals assessment pp g p gincluding modelled regional results and results for all models and various sensitivities

February 2010 3

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

BackgroundBackground

ICAO CAEP WG3 provided input on future technology p p gyimprovements and WG2 provided input on future operational improvements

2006 baseline and future 2016 2026 and 20362006 baseline and future 2016, 2026 and 2036

• NOx above 3,000 ft

• Full flight fuel burn and CASFE• Full-flight fuel burn and CASFE

Full flight fuel burn scenarios extrapolated to 2050

February 2010 4

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

GHG NO Ab 3 000 ft R lt (1)GHG: NOx Above 3,000 ft Results (1)

NOx Scenarios:NOx Scenarios:

• Scenario 1 - CAEP 7 Baseline

S i 2 M d t Ai ft T h l d • Scenario 2 - Moderate Aircraft Technology and Operational Improvement

• Scenario 3 - Advanced Aircraft Technology and • Scenario 3 - Advanced Aircraft Technology and Operational Improvement

February 2010 5

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

GHG NO Ab 3 000 ft R lt (2)GHG: NOx Above 3,000 ft Results (2)

February 2010 6

Total Global Aircraft NOx Emissions Above 3,000 ft AGL

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

GHG NO Ab 3 000 ft R lt (3)GHG: NOx Above 3,000 ft Results (3)

February 2010 7

Total Global Aircraft NOx Emissions Above 3,000 ft AGL Range of Scenarios

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

GHG: Fuel Burn and CASFE Full-Flight ResultsGHG: Fuel Burn and CASFE Full-Flight Results

Fuel Burn and CASFE Scenarios:

• Scenario 1 - CAEP 7 Baseline

• Scenario 2 - Low Aircraft Technology and Scenario 2 Low Aircraft Technology and Moderate Operational Improvement

• Scenario 3 - Moderate Aircraft Technology and Operational Improvement

• Scenario 4 - Advanced Aircraft Technology and O ti l I tOperational Improvement

• Scenario 5 - Optimistic Aircraft Technology and Advanced Operational ImprovementAdvanced Operational Improvement

Note: results were modelled for 2006, 2016, 2026, and 2036, then extrapolated to 2050

February 2010 8

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

GHG: Fuel Burn Full-Flight Results (1)GHG: Fuel Burn Full-Flight Results (1)

9

Combined International and Domestic

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

GHG: Fuel Burn Full-Flight Results (2)GHG: Fuel Burn Full-Flight Results (2)

February 2010 10

Figure 11: Total Global Aircraft Fuel Burn, Combined International and Domestic Range of Scenarios

Combined International and Domestic

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

GHG: Fuel Burn Full-Flight Results (3)GHG: Fuel Burn Full-Flight Results (3)

February 2010 11

Combined International and DomesticGreat Circle Routing Depicted

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

GHG: Fuel Burn Full-Flight Results (4)GHG: Fuel Burn Full-Flight Results (4)

February 2010 12

2006 International and Domestic Global Aircraft Fuel Burn

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

GHG: CASFE Full-Flight Results GHG: CASFE Full-Flight Results

13

Global Commercial Aircraft System Fuel Efficiency (CASFE)

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

Putting the Results in ContextPutting the Results in Context

February 2010 14

2006 Transportation-related CO2 Emissions Sources

*Percentages shown are based on the average of the 2006 IEA and UNFCCC data

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change

SummarySummary

A rich aviation noise, emissions and fuel burn ,database exists which can assist policy makers at the route, airport, regional, national and global levels

Aircraft technology and operational improvements Aircraft technology and operational improvements can go a long way toward limiting the increase in aircraft-related GHG emissions

The lack of certainty regarding aviation growth is the most substantial variable in forecasting GHG emissionso

Aircraft account for about 12 percent of the total of CO2 transportation emissions

February 2010 15