icao adrep 2007
DESCRIPTION
ICAO ADREP 2007. Focus on Incident reporting Jarmo Korhonen AIG Section Air Navigation Bureau. Overview. Vision ADREP SMS ICAO Annex 13 Reporting ECCAIRS Benefits of using an ADREP compatible system Road Map. Related Performance Indicators. ICAO – Performance Review Accident Rate - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ICAO ADREP2007
ICAO ADREP2007
Focus on Incident reporting
Jarmo Korhonen
AIG Section
Air Navigation Bureau
Focus on Incident reporting
Jarmo Korhonen
AIG Section
Air Navigation Bureau
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 2
Overview
Vision ADREP SMS ICAO Annex 13 Reporting ECCAIRS Benefits of using an ADREP compatible
system Road Map
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 3
Related Performance Indicators
ICAO – Performance Review
Accident Rate Level of mandatory reporting of the States
– Official Annex 13 reporting of contracting States vs. Media and other sources
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 4
Data Analysis
AIG Divisional Meeting (1999) Recommendation 2/1 – ADREP Data Analysis
– That ICAO develop a data analysis programme that will allow the effective analysis of ADREP data. The programme should enable the categorization of accidents, the development of appropriate safety indicators and the systematic and rapid identification and dissemination of safety issues. . . . .
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 5
Vision
To provide access to safety data and information required to meet and monitor levels of safety
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 6
How to Achieve This
Integrated Systems Compatible Taxonomies
ADREP ECCAIRS safety management tool
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 7
ADREP
A System for Providing Feedback of Safety Lessons Learned:
From States to ICAO
and
From ICAO back to States
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 8
ADREP Taxonomy
Effective analysis of ADREP data Definitions, Taxonomies, etc. ECCAIRS common frame work
Safety indicators Categorisation of accidents Identification and dissemination of safety
issues
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 9
ICAO – ADREP
ADREP – Accident Incident Data Reporting System A database of accidents and serious incidents
reported to ICAO by States Maintained in the AIG Section Contains occurrences from 1970 to today 35 892 Occurrences (07 NOV 07)
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 10
Safety Programme (States)
- An integrated set of regulations and activities aimed at improving safety
Safety Management System
- A systematic approach to managing safety, including the necessary organizational structures, accountabilities, policies and procedures
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 11
States shall require, as part of their safety programme, that an [operator, maintenance organization, ATS provider, certified aerodrome operator] implements a safety management system accepted by the State that, as a minimum:
Identifies safety hazards Ensures that remedial action necessary to maintain an
acceptable level of safety is implemented Provides for continuous monitoring and regular assessment of
the safety level achieved Aims to make continuous improvement to the overall level of
safety
ICAO Annexesas of 23 November 2006
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 12
New Approach & Future Focus
Must be guided by hazards identified through Safety Information shared and problems addressed by cooperative approach (Includes routine collection)
Effectiveness metrics System monitoring for emerging risks Combined Data sources (beyond current scope) and
sharing (Safety issues) Analysis
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 13
ACCIDENTS
SERIOUS INCIDENTS
OTHER SAFETY RELATED OCCURRENCES / HAZARDS
Investigatio
nPrevention
Aviation Safety Pyramid
3000
300
1
15
INCIDENTS
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 14
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 15
ADREP Reporting RequirementsAnnex 13 – Chapter 7
States investigate and report to ICAO: Accidents to aircraft over 2 250 kg (para.7.1, 7.5) Investigated incidents to aircraft over 5 700 kg (para.
7.7) Means of reporting:
Reporting forms, Electronic reporting
Guidance: Accident Incident Reporting Manual
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 16
ICAO Reporting standard for StatesAnnex 13 - Chapter 7, Attachment B
Initial Notification Preliminary Report Data Report Final Report
ADREP REPORTING
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 17
Accident/Incident Reporting to ICAO
Occurrence
Investigation
Data
Analysis
Data entry
Initial Notification
Prelim
report
Data
report
Final
report
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 18
Global Reporting CulturePercentage of Open Files
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
10%
~30%
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 19
Global Reporting Culture
58 States notify ICAO between 25 and 75% of the time
58 States notify ICAO less than 25% of the time
51 States notify ICAO more than 75% of the time
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 20
Accident Prevention Measures Annex 13 - Chapter 8
Incident reporting system A State shall establish an accident and
incident reporting systems (8.1 & 8.2)
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 21
Database systems Recommendation - A State should
establish a database to facilitate effective analysis of information obtained from incident reporting systems (8.4)
Recommendation – The database systems should use standardized formats (8.5)
Accident Prevention Measures Annex 13 - Chapter 8
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 22
Reporting flow
AIB ICAOADREP using ECCAIRS
database software
CAA
StateData Base
StateRegional Body
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 23
Analysis of data – Preventive actions A State shall analyse the information
contained in its database to determine any preventive actions required (8.6)
Recommendation. – If a State identifies safety matters considered to be of interest to other States, that State should forward such safety information to them as soon as possible (8.7)
Accident Prevention Measures Annex 13 - Chapter 8
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 24
Example
DATAFORMAT FILE
AVIATION SAFETY OFFICER
BROWSER
ECCAIRS DATABASE
EDF
Queries and Reports
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 25
Exchange of safety information Recommendation. – States should
promote the establishment of safety information sharing networks and should facilitate the free exchange of information on potential safety deficiencies (8.9)
Accident Prevention Measures Annex 13 - Chapter 8
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 26
Service Providers
ATNS, Aerodromes, Air Operators
Contracting States
ICAO
RO
Reporting to ICAO as per Annex 13 provisions
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 27
ECCAIRS view
Not reported to ICAO = Media Source
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 28
Level of practical usage
NEWHazard
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 29
Occurrence = sequence of events
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 30
Example of Output
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 31
Distribution of Type of Occurrence
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
1997-2001
2002-2006
Accidents
Serious Incidents
Incidents
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 32
Distribution of Type of Occurrence
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
SI
ACC
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 33
Regional Distribution (% to total Fatal Accidents) by
major Occurrence Categories for 2002-2006
20.7%
10.0%
16.7%
5.9%
9.1%
12.3%
17.2%
5.0%
5.6%
5.9%
9.1%
18.2%
10.4%
3.4%
30.0%
22.2%
29.4%
9.1%
9.1%
17.0%
13.8%
15.0%
16.7%
5.9%
9.1%
9.1%
12.3%
3.4%
11.8%
2.8%
6.9%
5.0%
5.6%
11.8%
18.2%
7.6%
3.4%
27.3%
3.8%
6.9%
5.0%
11.1%
9.1%
18.2%
7.6%
LOC-I SCF-PP CFIT F-POST ADRM RE EVAC SCF-NP
WORLD
NA
ME
LA
EUR
AP
AFR
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 34
Probability (%) of Accident rate exceeding twice the mean accident rate
-10.0%0.0%
10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%
100.0%
AF AP EU LA ME NA
Probability(%) - Accidentrate
Departureshare
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 35
Reactive versus Proactive Safety
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 36
Benefits using ADREP ECCAIRS
Implements comprehensive SMS principles
ICAO ADREP taxonomy compatible Designed for data sharing Family of tools and common framework
(multi modal) Free for all ICAO Contracting States Very stable system Available in English and French
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 37
Why not to choose ADREP ECCAIRS ?
Not a solution to solve all problems of aviation, only a data storage (should be seen as part of safety management systems)
No reasoning because ICAO needs or recommendation for ADREP compatible systems
No reasoning because of ICAO Audits No reasoning because of somebody’s request,
but rather because of commitment to safety and professionalism
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 38
Options
States with well established safety data systems: No need to convert to ICAO taxonomies Needs to map native system to ICAO
taxonomies to send data
States with a low level of aviation activity Evaluate the possibility of participating in a
sub-regional system
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 39
Options (cont.)
All other States ADREP ECCAIRS
Note – even if you do not implement ADREP ECCAIRS through-out your Civil Aviation system, you may still consider putting it on one work station so that you can share data with other who do use ADREP ECCAIRS
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 40
Next Steps
1) Define Focal Point of the State for the safety information and reporting systems (as part of the Safety Program of the State)
2) Define safety data and safety information system requirements
3) Select appropriate solution
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 41
For those who choose to implement ADREP ECCAIRS
Software will be provided by the EU through ICAO at no charge
Training is available on demand to ICAO HQ (not EU/JRC; participants and/or hosts to cover expenses)
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 42
Biggest Risk and Safety Culture
Biggest risk lay in the absence of reporting and standards
Safety culture must exist
Evaluation by safety performance (indicators & factors)
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 43
Aviation Safety System
Safety Policy Safety Information and Reporting
mandatory & voluntary reporting ADREP
Accident Prevention Programme Investigation of incidents and accidents Education and training
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 44
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 45
Questions?
ADREP ECCAIRS 2007, slide 46
THANK YOU