ibuild - home - proposal template updated...
TRANSCRIPT
Pen
nnSStateThe
Joe Buyer,
eIceesisTeam
, Steve Conr
eHoPromiBUI
roe, Logan G
ockeoposILD
Gray, and Sim
eyAsal
mi Veit
Arenna
Table of
Executive
Design In
Structura
Lighting/
Mechani
Construc
Structura
Lighting/
Mechani
Construc
Measurin
Design In
Structura
Lighting/
Mechani
Construc
Structura
Lighting/
Mechani
Construc
Measurin
Design In
Structura
Lighting/
Mechani
Construc
Penn S
Joe Bu
Contents
e Summary .
ntent for Ma
al Solution M
/Electrical So
cal Solution
ction Solutio
al Tasks and
/Electrical So
cal Tasks an
ction Tasks a
ng Success fo
ntent for the
al Solution M
/Electrical So
cal Solution
ction Solutio
al Tasks and
/Electrical So
cal Tasks an
ction Tasks a
ng Success fo
ntent for the
al Solution M
/Electrical So
cal Solution
ction Solutio
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
...................
ain Arena ....
Methods ......
olution Meth
Methods ...
n Methods .
Tools .........
olution Meth
d Tools .......
nd Tools ....
or the Main
e Community
Methods ......
olution Meth
Methods ...
n Methods .
Tools .........
olution Meth
d Tools .......
nd Tools ....
or the Comm
e East Facade
Methods ......
olution Meth
Methods ...
n Methods .
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
....................
....................
....................
hods .............
....................
....................
....................
hods .............
....................
....................
Arena .........
y Rink ..........
....................
hods .............
....................
....................
....................
hods .............
....................
....................
munity Rink .
e ..................
....................
hods .............
....................
....................
age 2 of 51
nroe
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Logan
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Gray
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
posal
/2011
Veit
...... 4
...... 5
...... 6
...... 9
.... 11
.... 13
.... 15
.... 16
.... 17
.... 18
.... 19
.... 20
.... 21
.... 24
.... 25
.... 27
.... 29
.... 30
.... 31
.... 32
.... 33
.... 34
.... 36
.... 38
.... 39
.... 40
Structura
Lighting/
Mechani
Construc
Measurin
APPENDI
APPENDI
APPENDI
Referenc
Penn S
Joe Bu
al Tasks and
/Electrical Ta
cal Tasks an
ction Tasks a
ng Success fo
X A: Spring S
X C: Index o
X D: Additio
ces ..............
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
Tools .........
asks and too
d Tools .......
nd Tools ....
or the East F
Schedule ....
of Figures ....
onal Thesis R
...................
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
....................
ls .................
....................
....................
Facade .........
....................
....................
Requirement
....................
age 3 of 51
nroe
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
ts .................
....................
Logan
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Gray
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
posal
/2011
Veit
.... 42
.... 43
.... 44
.... 45
.... 46
.... 47
.... 49
.... 50
.... 51
Executive
Ththat is beihockey teopening in6000 specused primThe main events at used for asmall stafUniversitybuildings engineeriengineeriuniversity
Thevent levefacility, thday servicit is compstorage, cexperiencthe main floor plan
AiBUILD aimPenn Stat
123
Penn S
Joe Bu
e Summary
he Penn Stateing designed eams. The plan the fall of 2ctators in themarily for NCAice sheet muthe arena, wa range of serff of employeey Drive near tare mainly spng students ang solutions fy.
here are threel, hosts the the ice supportces. The secoprised of a largconcessions, ace as enjoyabkitchen, a pris have been w
s a collaboratms to evaluatte Ice Hockey
. The main a
. The comm
. The easter
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
e Ice Hockey Aso that Penn anned arena i2013. The are main arena aAA hockey eveust meet all Nhich will be itrvices from hoes. The facilitthe Bryce Jordports complexat Penn State for the projec
ee main floorstwo ice sheett plant, and mond level, the ge radial circuand restroomle as possiblevate dining swell thought‐
tive group of te and devise Arena. Thes
arena munity rink rn facade
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
Arena is a 22State can havis currently inena is currentand 300 spectents and the cCAA standardts primary puockey tournaty will be locadan Center onxes and do noUniversity, tect, while prod
s that all servets, all permanmany other spmain concouulation spacems. The patroe for the specpace, and the‐out and will
engineering sthe most effese three spac
age 4 of 51
nroe
4,000 squareve their first n the developly being desigtators in the community rids in order forpose. The cments to recrated on a 10.2n Penn State’ot have a defieam iBUILD pducing an icon
e separate puent employepaces that wilurse level, is t that surrounn oriented sptators. The te typical concbe kept as co
students, all hective designes are:
Logan
e foot, 90 feetmen’s and wopment phase ogned to hold community rink will act asor Penn State community rinreational skat2 acre lot on s University Pinitive architeplans to delivenic and nation
urposes for the offices, a call maintain thypical of mosnds the seats,paces are desop level, the course and reonsistent as p
hosting a diff solution for
Gray
t tall, and threomen’s NCAAof design, wita maximum crink. The mais the workhorto host any Nnk, on the othting and will bthe corner ofPark campus.ectural style. er the most enally recogniz
he arena. Theardio and weihe arena by rust ice hockey the press/brigned and laidclub level, co
estroom spaceossible with t
ferent area ofthree main fe
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
ee‐level buildA Division 1 th hopes of capacity of arn arena will brse of the areNCAA Divisionher hand, wilbe supportedf Curtin Road The surroun As architectuefficient zed facility fo
e lowest leveight training unning its dayarenas. Mearoadcasting bd out to makeonsists of suites. The interthe design to
f expertise, teeatures of the
posal
/2011
Veit
ding
round be ena. n 1 l be d by a and nding ural
or the
l, the
y‐to‐aning, ooth, e the es, rior date.
eam e
Design In
Inall NCAA DGiven freeto save enspace an i
Thstructure,will resolvby the despace a uof the tru
Ashaped stinvolved. order to ksoftware exported
Figure 1. A d
Penn S
Joe Bu
ntent for Ma
n order for iBUDivision 1 reqedom to use tnergy, produciconic look th
he integrated, mechanical ve the structusign of this icnique aesthetss design can
ll individuals tructural syste There will nekeep a fluid dwhich will beinto Naviswo
detail of the prom
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
ain Arena
UILD to desigquirements, wthe iBUILD arce a truly innohat will bring s
d system that ducts, electriural, mechanionic structurtic and suppon be seen in F
are affected em compriseseed to be conesign processe imported intorks in order t
oposed integratemain arena
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
n a state‐of‐twhile meetingrchitectural aovative and inspectators ba
will support cal feeders, acal, and electal system. Thort an extraorigure 1 below
by the designs the MEP sysnstant interfes. This will beto Revit (if poto run interfe
ed system used
age 5 of 51
nroe
the‐art hockeg the programnd engineerinntegrated bacack time and a
the main areand sprinkler trical loads ofhe structure wrdinary experw.
lookbe coeye. ducthiddroof radiathe rlook intenice. sightfocuscore
n that has prestems; which rence/clash de accomplisheossible), the perence checks
in the
Logan
ey arena we inm requiremenng values, theckbone for thagain.
na is exactly mains are allf the main arewill hide the orience to any
To give thk, the mechanompletely co As mentionetwork used toden in the struf loads and thant floor heatrisers. The ark by moving thnded to hangThis is being t‐line related s more on thboards.
eviously beenis a large coodetections aned with the uprogram that s.
Gray
ntend to invents outlined be main arena he space; all w
what its nam hosted in theena. All discipother systemand all inhab
he space a venical systems oncealed fromed above, theo condition thuctural frameere will be a ting system inrena will also he large scoreg directly overdone to limitproblems, ane ice rather t
described. Tordination effnd design revise of design awill host all d
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
stigate and mby the owner.will be desig
while giving th
me implies. The same frameplines are affs and will givebitants. An im
ery clean and in the space w
m the occupane mechanical he space will be that supportsupplementancorporated ikeep its cleaeboard that wr the center ot any lighting nd to keep ththan on the
The skate bladfort for all paiews performauthoring designs, and t
posal
/2011
Veit
meet ned he
he e that fected e the mage
crisp will nts’
be ts the ary into n was of the and e
de rties ed in
then
Structura Amain arenas the mawill be thrBIM technbetween available,made. Asavailable
Thtruss and of the trulaminatedthat will cnorth andpreliminaother threThere hassupport thsupported
Figure 2. Ththe truss. T
Toneed to barena. Thadded thrframes ar
Penn S
Joe Bu
al Solution M
s outlined in na. It will houain structural roughout thenologies thereall team mod will import ts a personal gin fulfilling th
he structural the frame thss will featured member actclose the V‐shd south directry rise of 14ftee discipliness been a prelihe governing d curved beam
he Picture aboveThe truss is assu
o decrease me incorporatehis will requirerusting/laterare of the typic
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
Methods
the design inuse mechanicsupport for t design procee will be consdels. The struhe SAP modegoal the structhe tasks laid o
contribution at will take the two steel wting as the wehaped truss; ations over thet to the peak, and the use minary studyloads on them with a 14ft
e illustrates prelmed to be actin
member sizes ed into the exe the gravity al force. The cal sizes: W24
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
tent, the truscal ductwork, he roof systeess for team istant checks bctural engineel into the teatural engineeout in this pro
to the designhe resultant twide flange sheb member aall can be seene main ice she, but this dimof design itery done to dete roof, as showt rise).
iminary sizes usng as a simply su
in the curvedxisting gravityand lateral frexisting struc4 girders, W24
age 6 of 51
nroe
ss will be a veelectrical conm. This in itsBUILD. Usingbeing done toeer will be moam Revit moder aims to useoposal.
n of the mainthrusts from tapes acting and shear trann in Figure 2 eet. The trussension will berations to achermine what wn beside Fig
sing the geometupported beam;
d truss over thy load and latrames at thesctural sizes, gi4 columns on
SteeW12SkatWooUsin(Ashe
OveIx = 3
Logan
ery integral annduit, and pluself shows hog integration o ensure thatodeling in SAPdel as design de as much BIM
arena will fothe pin endedas the top chonsfer mechanbelow. This ss will have a ce developed fhieve a more the member gure 2 below
tries described i; with no thrust
he main arenateral load resise framing liniven by an oun interior, and
el Section Pro2x230 Top Chte Blade (Ax=6od Section Prng 16F‐V2 Gluear = 650in2; berall Section P350000in4; A
Gray
nd integratedumbing mainsow big of a facconcurrentlyt no interferenP 2000 and, ifdecisions andM technology
ocus on the ded truss. The sords, a woodenism, and a stsystem spanscurved shapefurther with teconomical ssizes would n(considering
in the above parresisting eleme
a, thrust resisisting frames es to be desigutside source,d W18 column
operties: hords (Ax = 6767.7in2) roperties: ue‐Laminatedb=17in; d=6ft)Properties: = 205in2
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
d feature in ths; all while acctor collaboray with emerginces are occuf the link is d changes arethat is curren
esign of the mstructural poren glued‐teel bottom cs 196 feet in te with a the input fromstructural soluneed to be tothe truss a si
ragraph that expents at the suppo
sting elementof the main gned to resist, found in thens on exterio
7.7in2)
d Timber )
posal
/2011
Veit
he cting ation ng urring
e ntly
main rtion
hord he
m the ution. o mply
plains ort.
ts will
t this e r.
Without ican only bFigures 3 prelimina
Figure 3. Thload
Penn S
Joe Bu
nducing a thrbe downsizedand 4 that rery structural
he red frame linds applied to the
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
rust into the ad if the framesepresent whatsystem desig
es shown abovee building. The
WorkIx = 2
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
arched truss ts are used to t the system an.
e are those thatblue dots are th
king Model C00000in4; A =
196ft
age 7 of 51
nroe
the member sresist the thras a whole lo
t will be used to he locations whe
Custom Truss S125in2
196ft
t Span
14ft Rise
Logan
sizes becomerust from theooks like and s
resist thrust froere the truss wi
Section:
t Span
Gray
e extremely ue arch. Belowsome geomet
om the roof trusll be supported
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
neconomicalw are two imagtry used in th
ss and external by the frames.
posal
/2011
Veit
and ges, he
lateral
Figure 4. Tgoing to t
Inapparent ensure thlateral fraand connediaphragm
out, and sthe structschedulinadvancingerection pCM’s plancalculatiointegrated
Thdesign. Awithin thesize of dutruss becaThere hasneeds to bpanels at does occuparties, anthe Unive
Figure 5
Penn S
Joe Bu
The sizes shownthe basis for whlayout and size
n designing ththat the diapat the diaphrames. All struection considm in pink; wh
should result tural memberg, and fabricag. This includprocess, and ln to perform ans carried oud truss.
his system wiAn example ofe main arena,cts, which areause enough s also been a be done on thstrategic placur. With the un optimum soersity who wil
. Displays the dinfill
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
n are the structuich the design wes come from a
he roof structphragm will haragm load canuctural designderations. Figere the rest o
in the most crs in the arch ation considees specifyinglimiting the ca crane analyut to verify an
ill also requiref this is: the h, which directe to be housespace must bconcern as tohe equipmences in the spause of ongoinolution will bel benefit mos
iaphragm, the al beams in pink
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
ural members thwill be comparedpreliminary wor
ure and framave to be stun be adequaten standards wgure 5 below sof the structu
cost effective and supporti
erations will b enough splicrane size for tsis for the trud size of the
e constant inthigher the peatly affects theed within the be left within o how to accet within. Teaan of the trussng design revie formulated st as owner.
arched trusses, a
age 8 of 51
nroe
hat will be resistd once changes rking model tha
es that will tadied. There wely transferrewill be held forshows the arcre for the are
shear to exphardwfeaturthe CMvaluesused ilaminareviewallow f
system for thing frames. Ube taken into ce locations tothe CM. The usses used in crane needed
teraction witak of the roofe demand loatruss frame,the truss to aess mechanicaam iBUILD wils to allow forew meetingsfor the struc
and
Logan
ting the thrust frand structural s
at the structural
ake the thruswill need to bed to the trusr the diaphrached trusses,ena is shown
Using gluedtransfer in thplore the optiwoods as an are in the mainM, the structus based on thn the fabricatated memberws throughoufor constant
he glulam meUsing the CM’account whilo facilitate thstructural enthe main ared to perform
h the ME throf becomes thed for the ME’will also be aallow for the al equipmentl design the tr the equipmes and clash dectural enginee
Gray
rom the curved solutions are de engineer has d
st from the trube a comprehsses and takengm including, the infill beain green.
d‐laminated the arch allowson of using lorchitectural an arena. Woural engineere hardwood ttion process ors. Having thut the processcost compari
embers as we’s input all ere the design he most efficiengineer will aena. There withe erection
oughout the e larger the v’s mechanicaa major factormechanical st if a problemtruss to have ent to be servetection sessioer, but more s
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
roof truss. Theeveloped. Noteeveloped.
usses, it becohensive study n out through deflection chams, and the
timber as thes for team iBUocally harvestand structurarking closely w will use desigtree types beof the glued‐e CM in desigs of the designsons to be ca
ell as the rest ection, process is ent schedule,lso support thill be some process of th
process of thvolume of spal systems. Thr for sizing theystem to fit. arises and sehidden accesviced if a probons betweenspecifically, fo
posal
/2011
Veit
ey are : The
omes to h the hecks
e UILD ted l with gn eing
gn n will arried
of
, he
he
e ace he e
ervice ss blem all or
Lighting/
Inrequiremefirst systeneeds to bA.F.F. is recenter mavertical unRevit’s Eluplayers aslighting stvertically.than 3 sec
Thstill cameice showsbe broughis controllpower camthe arenasystem fo
Thbe providsource of maintenaput focus provided decks will
Siplumbing part of ouplaced on
Ththe ice anreflect therequireme
Penn S
Joe Bu
/Electrical So
n order to maents, there arem is the evenbe precise ligequired to haain camera neniformity willumtools The ds well as the atages that are In order to aconds with lit
he next systera strobes, ans the electricaht in by outsidled from the mera strobes for the porta
or all of these
hroughout thed by instantgeneral illumnce, and cleaon “Section Eby an instant be illuminate
ince the integmains; all wh
ur design, it wn a small lip o
he total designd the stands,e lighting desents.
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
olution Met
ke the main are multiple lignt lighting. Toht levels and ave 125 fc witeeds to be 75 be 2.5:1 maxdesign must aaudience meme strategicallyachieve the “bttle to no ligh
ms to considnd scoreboardal system neede tour compcontrol booths for still cameable manned elements as
he arena theret on floodlightmination (appanup. The stuE” as requestt on floodlighted by in grad
grated glulamhile acting as will be illuminan the steel bo
gn will be less, 3.01 w/sq. ftign and the p
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
thods
arena an iconghting and eleo meet NCAA uniformity bth a uniformit5 fc with a unix to min. Thisalso avoid caumbers. The 10y place in the black out scent leak.
er are the temd power loadds to have thpanies. Duringh, mounted oera photograpspotlights. Thwell as typica
e will be housts aimed at throximately 10dent section ed in the feast mounted one fixtures con
m truss that hothe main struated with a coottom cord co
s than or equat. and .43 w/spower distribu
age 9 of 51
nroe
nic integratedectrical systemDivision one oth horizontaty ratio of 1.5iformity ratios will be measusing direct a000W metal harena in ordenario” there a
mporary lightds. Since the ae capability tg the blackouon the lightingphy. There where will be aal scoreboard
se, emergenche stands fro0 to 20 fc) wilwill be brightsibility statemn the lighting nnected to th
ouses mechanuctural suppoontinuous stroordinated w
al to ASHRAE sq. ft. respectution system
Logan
d space and mms that neednational broaally and vertic5:1 max to mio of 1.5:1 maxsured either und reflected halide fixtureer to get full care shutters o
ting, theatricaarena may hoto power supt there will bg stage systemill be designaan allowance d power loads
cy, and aisle lim the platforll be used for ter (2:1 ratio)ment. The emstages. The se normal and
nical ductworort for the roorip of low voltwith the struct
90.1 2010 potively. Branchwill be mode
Gray
meet NCAA divd to be taken adcasting reqcally. The horn. The verticax to min, whilusing AGi32, 3glare and shaes are to be mcoverage horon the fixture
al effects, porold events sucplemental eqe theatrical em, along withated locationsmade in the s.
ighting. The hrms. This houspectator ar) than the resmergency lightsteps leading d emergency
rk, electrical cof system is stage LED’s. Thtural enginee
ower density h circuits, willeled in Revit t
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
vision one into account.quirements, thrizontal planeal plane for the the end cam3D Studio Maadows for themounted on izontally and es that close i
rtable spotligch as concertsquipment thateffect lightingh a series of hs in the cornepower distrib
house lightingse lighting asrival, departut of the standting will also bfrom the seapower.
conduit, and uch an integrhese LED’s shr.
requirementl be designedto meet NEC 2
posal
/2011
Veit
. The here e 3’ he mera ax or e
n less
hts s or t may g that igh ers of bution
g will s a ure, ds to be ating
ral hall be
ts for to 2011
Most cooengineer. main itemthat will sfeeders tastructuraltruss.
Penn S
Joe Bu
rdination for The location
ms that requirsupply power ake up a small engineer and
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
the lighting a of the light sre specific comto the differell compartmed mechanical
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
and electrical stages and themmunicationent lighting syent of the trusl engineer to
ge 10 of 51
nroe
design of thee total distrib. The integraystems; this wss yet still neeavoid clashin
Logan
e main arena buted weight ated truss willwill require soed to be coorng. See figure
Gray
will occur wiof the light fil enclose mosome coordinardinated using1 for a visual
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
th the structuixtures will best of the feedation as well. g BIM with thl of the integr
posal
/2011
Veit
ural e the ers The
he rated
Mechani
Themphasis the main objective.
Thdesign gosprinkler sthat they selection.sizing withfor the marequiring
comfort wchampionbetter strthe hot wefficiently
Aheating. Aboth systewhile conwhich can
Thwill be invdehumidihandling u
Figure 6. R
Penn S
Joe Bu
ical Solution
he mechanicaon collaboraarena there a. These areas
he current strals and visionsystem insidefit inside the Preliminary hin the structain arena allominimal back
while allowingnship ice. Theucture and th
water distributy transferring
comparison A cost analysiems. Structurstruction man be found in
he equipmenvestigated. Thfication proceunits for both
Raised Aluminum
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
n Methods
al systems fortion and the are a numberare listed an
ructure memn of the Penn e, hiding the estructure andcalculations itural memberowing for minkground noise
g the air over risers will behermodynamtion system aheat.
will be done s will also be ral will analyznagement wierection.
t selection whe first is twoess, and the oh rinks. A cost
m Risers by Stru
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
r the main areuniversities dr of areas thatd described i
bers for the mState Ice Areelements fromd work efficiendicate that rs. High speednimal noise due.
cwiaummt
its d
the ice to reme filled with a ic propertiesnd a product
to an all air sycompleted coe the impact ill also analyz
ill also be heao air‐handling other is a sept evaluation w
uctal
ge 11 of 51
nroe
ena will focusdesires for ant will be focusn the followin
main arena arena. It incorpom the spectatently. Care wihigher velocitd diffusing nouring peak loa
The icreates a largwould requireiBUILD’s solutanother integused in combmanufacturedmore traditiothe structura
design. Radia
main at a temsubstance to. An engineert selected to f
ystem to anaomparing up on supportine the impact
avily scrutinizunits with dearate desiccawill be done t
Logan
s on iBUILD’s NCAA Divisiosed on in ordng paragraph
re a clean, intorates the metors. Careful dill also have tties will haveozzles will be ading and alt
ntegrated rooge volume to e larger mechtion to this pgrated producbination with d by Structal.onal precast cl and constru
nt floor heati
mperature suio be determinring solution wfill the raised
lyze the prosfront cost asng members aon schedule
zed. There areesiccant wheeant wheel whto compare th
Gray
team goals won 1 ice hockeer to meet thhs.
tegrated soluechanical ducdesign of the o be taken in to be used toinvestigated ernate ice us
of structure isventilate andhanical equiproblem comect. Radiant floraised alumin. The system concrete and uction manag
ing will allow
itable for mained after invewill have to baluminum ris
s and cons of well as payband what savand any addi
e two differeels built into tich will serviche two system
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
with a heavy ey facility. Whe above
ution for the ctwork and ducts will enn the diffuser o reduce the to ensure lowe which migh
s also an archd condition wment and dues in the formoor heating wnum risers will replace tincorporate bement option
for localized
intaining estigation for be designed fosers while stil
radiant floor ack periods fings can be foitional saving
nt systems wthem for the ce all three aims. An
posal
/2011
Veit
ithin
nsure
duct w NC ht
h and hich cts.
m of will be
he both ns in
or ll
for ound s
which
r‐
investigatperiods ofeither off
iBan ice plaway to se
Penn S
Joe Bu
tion will also tf low use whior running at
BUILD also plant. Two diffet up the ice p
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
take place intile still meetint full load.
ans to get in trent companplant for the P
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
to whether orng the ventila
touch with anies will be conPenn State Ice
ge 12 of 51
nroe
r not the twoation requirem
n ice manufacntacted so the Arena.
Logan
o air‐handling ments for the
cturer to talk hat the ME ca
Gray
units can be e space so the
about differen get a bette
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
cycled duringe equipment
ent ways to ser idea of the
posal
/2011
Veit
g is
et up best
Construc
Thconstructintegratedexpertise These alteas scheduexchangeand perfo
Aconstructfor Divisioconsideraprocuremtruss and erection; of the exp
Thdifferent constructproximitycapabilitiewith that the use ofwith the rselection capabilitiepositive im
Thsystem anOff, RS Mthe informconstructdisciplinemechanicconnectio
Thdevelop a
Penn S
Joe Bu
ction Solutio
he responsibiion considerad team, the cto the table, ernate thoughule and constr throughout torming clash d
s described inion of the inton 1 hockey aations and anament, and LEEsupporting frand concludepected LEED S
he initial anamaterial optiion manager y of materials es of manufacof an investigf materials anrest of the intof these mates, acousticalmpact on the
he second annd supportingeans Buildingmation. In ordion manager s. The CM wilcal, lighting, aon requireme
he next step an understand
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
on Methods
ility of the coations througonstruction mencouraging ht processes ructability. Juthe design andetection and
n the design iegrated trussat Penn State.alyses must bD opportunitrames; an in‐de with a studySilver rating t
lysis of the coons and sourwill work cloin relation tocturers, and tgation of LEEDnd resources. tegrated desigerials will hav properties, r environment
alysis that wig frame. This g Constructionder to develowill be involvll require spend electrical nts from the
in making theding on how t
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
nstruction mhout the desimanager on tealternate thoinclude the est as well, thend constructiod solutions wi
ntent, the prs system that . In order to mbe performedies related todepth crane ay on value enghat is hoped
onstruction mces for the msely with the o the site, thethe material dD, ensuring th Throughoutgn team by cove an influencresistance to t.
ill be performwill be made n Cost Data, mp a cost analyved with extecific informatsystem layoustructural en
e design intenthis integrate
ge 13 of 51
nroe
anager on thign and consteam iBUILD wought processeffect of desige constructioon process byith the help o
imary investiis used to su
make this des. These analyo the former; analysis; 4D pgineering basto be achieve
manager on temembers withdesign team details and rdelivery procehat sustainabt this process,ommunicatince on each ofdecay, fabrica
med is a detailpossible thromanufacturerysis of the intnsive commution from eacut and requiregineer.
nt of the mained truss system
Logan
is project wiltruction of thwill have the ases throughogn decisions oon manager wy remaining inof the each of
gation of thepport the roosign a reality, yses include: ma detailed coplanning and sed on designed.
eam iBUILD win the integrafor material requirementsess. This analbility is a drivi, the construcng the importf the disciplination, cost, a
led cost analyough the use r’s quotes, antegrated trussunication andch of the memements, in ad
n arena a ream will be buil
Gray
l be to analyzis facility. As ability to brinout the designon cost to thewill help facilitnvolved in all f the disciplin
e main arena iof above the various constmaterial seleost estimate osequencing on decisions wi
will be to perfoated truss sysselection, ans of the fabriclysis will be ong factor, spection manageance of matees, such as stnd delivery, a
ysis of the intof Autodesk nd Microsoft s and supportd collaboratiombers of teamdition to mem
lity to the endlt. The constr
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
ze and managpart of an ng construction of the facilite project, as wtate informatdesign decisies.
is the design primary ice struction ction, of the integratof the truss ith a final ana
orm researchstem. The d then analyzcation processccur concurreecifically throer will work clerial selectiontructural as well as hav
tegrated trussQuantity TakExcel to orgating frame, thn with each om iBUILD inclumber sizes an
d user will beruction manag
posal
/2011
Veit
ge the
on ty. well tion ions
and heet
ted
alysis
h into
ze the s, the ently ough losely n. The
ving a
s ke‐nize he of the uding nd
e to ger
on team ia two parcollaboraterection, crane(s) tPrimaveraanalysis wthe seconiBUILD unto the mosequenceworkers o
ThresearchinLEED. Theas a wholachieve th
Penn S
Joe Bu
BUILD will wot analysis. Thtion with the and connectihat will be uta P6, and will will be combinnd piece of thnderstand theodeling proce in order to mon site.
he final analyng final valuee LEED analyse. In terms ofhe highest va
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
ork closely wie first will bestructural enon details. Thtilized for ereperform iterned with the ue two part ane impact of dess, the constrmake the erec
ysis that the ce engineering is will identifyf value enginelue to the ow
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
ith the integr that of perfongineer in dethe CM will dection using coations in ordeuse of 4D monalysis. The usesign decisionruction manaction process
construction mopportunitiey the final rateering, opporwner for the lo
ge 14 of 51
nroe
ated design torming an in‐dtermining theevelop a prelimonstruction scer to maximizodeling softwase of Naviswons to the scheger will have more efficien
manager on tes for the maiting that may rtunities will bowest possibl
Logan
team, specificdepth crane ae type of cranminary schedcheduling sofze the efficienare, namely Norks’ 4D modedule. By addthe ability tont, while mai
team iBUILD wn arena comb be achieved be identified le cost.
Gray
cally the strucanalysis. This e, crane loaddule and sequftware, namency of this proNavisworks, weling capabiliing the 4th Dio make iteratintaining the s
will perform ibined with a fby the designfor the main
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
ctural engineewill consist o
d requirementuence for the ely Oracle ocess. This which will servity will help temension of tiions to the crsafety of the
s identifying final analysis n of the buildarena in orde
posal
/2011
Veit
er in of ts for
ve as eam ime rane
and on
ding er to
Structura
1) Desiga) Ob) Ac) Ad) C
ofe) Pef) Og) Dh) M
i) 2) Desig
a) Cb) Wc) Rd) De) Of) Ag) Dh) M
i) i) D
i) ii)
3) Diapha) En
eb) C
Note: Stebe carried
Penn S
Joe Bu
al Tasks and
n an IntegratObtain all loadcquire maximnalyze schemrane sizing thf the CM eak height co
Obtain all memesign Top Ch
Model StructuIf Revit Lin
n review of alash Detectio
Work with MEepeat Steps cesign of Late
Obtain design nalyze 2D moesign frames
Model frames Import str
esign review Clash Dete
) Repeat ste
hragm Checksnsure the dialements onsider defle
ps 1 and 2 wid out.
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
d Tools
ed, Compositd information mum duct sizematic shape what may deter
onstraints thamber forces aord Membersre in Revit nk is availablerch on in Naviswo and CM to pc through h ural System torestraints, suodel of curvedto keep memin Revit Strucuctural modeof frame ection in Navieps b through
s phragm can a
ection limits a
ll be done co
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
te Steel and Wfor schematie from ME to with obtained rmine how m
t effect volumnd deflections, Bottom Ch
: export from
rks with ME aerform a costntil other disco Resist Thrustuch as membed truss and frmber forces bcture el into Revit S
sworks with Mh e as needed
adequately tr
nd connectio
ncurrently; th
ge 15 of 51
nroe
Wood Truss ic structural laget minimumloads and deany sections
me increase wns from schemord Members
m SAP/ETABS i
and L/E with Ct model of intciplines desigt from Curveder depth restrrames with prelow allowab
tructure, if lin
ME and L/E w
ransfer latera
on requireme
hey are just b
Logan
ayout m truss dimenesign restraintthe truss mu
with input fromatic SAP mos, and Web M
into Revit Str
CM coordinattegrated trusgns are done ad Truss rictions and aroper loads able levels
nk is available
with CM coord
al loads into th
nts for the di
broken up to s
Gray
nsions ts from ME anst be erected
om the ME odel Members base
ructure
ting the efforss and optimal d
architectural cnd geometrie
e
dinating the e
he lateral for
aphragm
show differen
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
nd CM d in, with the
ed on SAP val
rt
design achiev
considerationes used
effort
ce resisting
nt tasks that w
posal
/2011
Veit
help
lues
ved
ns
will
Lighting/
1) Desiga) Ab) Mc) Cd) See) Af) M
2) Desiga) Ab) Sec) Ad) A
3) Specifa) Ab) A
4) Desiga) Db) Dc) Md) M
Penn S
Joe Bu
/Electrical So
n Main Eventnalyze design
Model arena inoordinate lighelect possibledd to fixture
Model in Revit
n aisle lightinnalyze designelect possibledd to Revit mdd to fixture
fy theatrical edd to Revit mdd to fixture
n branch circetermine all esign panel b
Model in RevitModel conduit
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
olution Met
t Lighting Systn criteria n 3D AutoCADhting stage loe fixtures, detschedule andt
ng, general illun criteria e fixtures, detmodel and runschedule and
effects, portamodel schedule and
uits for main loads boards and sizt and coordint running thro
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
thods
tem
D ocations with termine reflecd give specific
umination, st
termine LLFsn calculationsd give specific
ble spotlights
d give specific
arena
ze branch circate with ME aough integrat
ge 16 of 51
nroe
SE ctances, detec information
udent section
with Elumtoc information
s, and still cam
c information
cuits and SE for clated truss
Logan
ermine LLFs, a to CM for co
n, and emerg
ols to CM for co
mera strobes
to CM for co
ash detection
Gray
and run calcuost
gency lighting
ost
s location
ost
n
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
lations in AG
posal
/2011
Veit
I
Mechani
1) Sizinga) Ob) Uc) Sid) Ce) Sef) M
2) Desig
a) Sei)
ii)iii
b) Di) ii)
c) Ind) C
i) ii)iii
e) C
3) Selecta) Db) Dc) Cd) D
i) ii)
e) Cf) M
4) Desig
a) C
Penn S
Joe Bu
ical Tasks an
g of the ducts Obtain the newse Trane Tracize the main bollaborate wielect a diffuseModel in Revit
n of radiant felect a suitab
Consider tpolyethyle
) Choose thei) Collaboratesign the pip
Select the ) Design pip
(1) Invest(2) Engine(3) Ensure
nvestigate camompare an al
Compare h) Compare hi) Determineollaborate wi
t air handlersetermine theetermine remompare diffeetermine uni
Design lay) Ensure tha
off, enhanollaborate wi
Model in Revit
n the ice planontact two di
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
nd Tools
in main arenw height of thce to calculatbranches andith structural er/nozzle that MEP
floor heating ble material tohe thermodyene insulatione best one atte with Structing system totype of pipin
ping layout wiigate differeneer a solutione that heat is mpus utilitiesll‐air system how use of rahow it effectse payback perith CM throug
s for the maine amount of hmaining load trent AHU (unts location anout which allat only one AHcing the life oith Structural t MEP
nt for the maiifferent ice pr
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
a he integratede the amountd offshoots usthat sufficient gives a reas
in stadium riso fill risers ynamic propen, etc.) transferring tural during seo be used in tg to be used thin the risernt ways to conn if necessaryevenly distribs vs. dedicated
adiant floorings equipment sriod for the syghout to assis
n arena heat that can that needs tonits w/desiccand configuratows for eitheHU will be runof the AHU’s aon the locati
in arena rofessionals f
ge 17 of 51
nroe
truss to calcut of CFM neesing either prent space existsonable NCT
sers
rties of sever
heat election proche risers (pex, steel, Prs nnect the diff
buted over thd equipment
g effects enerselection costystem st with value
be generatedo be coveredant wheel vs. tion er unit to feednning at full land maximiziion of the AH
for help desig
Logan
ulate the voluded in the maessure drop ots in structure
ral different m
ess for struct
VC, etc.)
ferent risers t
he entire riserin the buildin
rgy costs usints
engineering
d by the radia
units withou
d both branchoad and cycleing the efficieU
gning and sele
Gray
ume in the main arena or velocity e
materials (ligh
tural input in
to the main b
r using thermng
ng Trane Trac
ant floor
t desiccant w
hes during offe the load to ency of the un
ecting equipm
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
ain arena
htweight conc
design of rise
branch
modynamics
ce
wheel)
f‐peak timesthe AHU thatnits
ment
posal
/2011
Veit
crete,
ers
t is
Construc
1) Matea) Ab) Inc) Rd) D
i) ii)
e) Pe
2) Perfoa) Pe
i) b) U
i)
c) Ci)
3) Perfoa) Cb) D
i) c) Im
i) d) Id
SE
4) Valuea) Cb) C
i)
Penn S
Joe Bu
ction Tasks a
rial selection nalyze the sonvestigate theesearch the develop a 4D m
Schedule w) 4D model erform a LEED
rm a detailederform a qua
Quantitiesse the quantCost informmanufactu
reate detailedQuantity a
rm an in‐depollaborate wievelop prelim
Developedmport the abo
4D model dentify inefficE to reach the
e engineering onduct reseaonduct a fina
Go throug
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
and Tools
investigationource of matee proximity ofdetails and remodel to illuswill be develowill be develoD analysis of t
d cost analysisntity take‐offs will be deterities and obtamation will beurer’s quotes d cost estimaand cost infor
th crane analith SE to deteminary schedud using Oracleove schedule will be createciencies in thee optimal con
and final LEErch into final al LEED analysh LEED check
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
n erials f materials inquirements ostrate the inteoped in Microoped in Navisthe material
s of integratef of truss comrmined using ain cost informe obtained fro
ate of the intemation will b
lysis and 4D mermine crane ule and sequee Primavera Pinto 4D moded using Navie design and cnstruction sol
ED analysis value enginesis klist and deter
ge 18 of 51
nroe
relation to thof the fabricategrated truss osoft Project osworks selection and
ed truss systemmponents Autodesk Qumation om RS Means
egrated truss be combined,
modeling type and sizeence for the cP6 eling softwarsworks construction ution
eering opport
rmine LEED ra
Logan
he site tion process fabrication por Oracle Prim
d sources of t
m and suppo
uantity Take‐O
s Building Con
and supportiorganized, a
e based on loacrane(s)
re
sequence an
tunities
ating as a res
Gray
process mavera P6
hese materia
rting frame
Off and Revit
nstruction Co
ing frame nd analyzed i
ading and spl
d perform ite
sult of design
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
als
ost Data and f
in Microsoft E
ice locations
erations with
decisions
posal
/2011
Veit
from
Excel
the
Measurin ultimatelyPenn Statrecruits tocombinat
Uconstructcurved arinstallatioeffort.
Thsavings caraised alulead time,than precsmaller cr
iBthe structentire spaof having creating aminimizinto attend minimizinspectator
Penn S
Joe Bu
ng Success f
The pry produce addte something o want to comion with the e
sing building ion schedule ch. Introducion of MEP equ
hrough the sean be found tuminum can b, delivery timast concrete rane.
BUILD believeture adds conace. With cooto keep the aa better condng the effect omore events
ng the amouns.
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
for the Main
rimary designded revenue to be proud ome play hockeepic space to
information by producinging this prefauipment, whi
election of tho offset the cbe found in the, and deliveand are easie
es that savingsnsiderable vololer temperatair temperatuition for the ion the ice. Ws, which meant of energy b
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
n Arena
intent for thfor the facilitof and a reasoey at the univ boast a com
modeling teag a 4D simulatbrication proch otherwise
e raised alumcost of the strhe constructiories can be cuer and faster t
s can also be ume, substanures over theure around 58ce. Radiant flith greater lons greater reveing used du
ge 19 of 51
nroe
e main arenaty. This spaceon to return. versity which petitive divisi
am iBUILD aimtion of the prcess will elime would have
minum risers aructure. Manyon and schedut substantiato assemble.
found througntial energy ce ice this will a8 degrees, temloor heating wcal comfort iBvenue. In addring times wh
Logan
a is producinge will give stu The space wwill give the ion 1 caliber t
ms to offset crefabrication minate time intaken a large
and radiant fly of the cost ule. When colly. The risersThey will req
gh the use of can be saved also minimizemperatures liwill allow for BUILD believeition, the syshen the main
Gray
g an iconic spadents, facultywill give addeteam the taleteam.
osts by savingapproach forn the field relae amount of t
loor heating asavings in theompared to ps also weigh cquire less skill
radiant floorby not havinge the loads onike 52 and lowbetter localizes that more stem can be t arena is not
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
ace that will y, and alumnied interest forent needed in
g time in the r the integratated to the ime and labo
additional cose selection ofrecast concreconsiderably lled labor and
r heating. Becg to conditionn the ice. Instwer can be uszed comfort wfans will be wurned on andbeing filled w
posal
/2011
Veit
i of r n
ed
r
st f ete, less a
cause n this tead sed while willing d off with
Design In
Kmake it anmain arento tastefuto keep thThere willvery user
Kmust use roof of thclosely to must firstplaced thearchitectunot the usa more st
Penn S
Joe Bu
ntent for the
nowing that tn aestheticallna. Using a boully integrate he use of gluel be requiremfriendly spac
nowing the roa creative soe communityformulate a figure out there, then theural ideals of se of the intereamlined de
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
e Communit
the communiy pleasing anowstring roofdaylighting ste‐laminated luments that muce, and they w
oof would malution to fit ay arena elsewsolution for the total amoustructural enteam iBUILD grated proceesign and con
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
ty Rink
ty rink will acnd iconic spacf truss there itrategies intoumber and stust be establiswill be discuss
ake a great loll mechanical
where. The methis design to unt of space ongineer can laand Penn Stass in combinastruction pro
ge 20 of 51
nroe
ct as the workce while compis an opportuo the design otructural steeshed and uphsed in the sol
ocation to plal equipment techanical andbe efficiently
on the roof neayout the struate Universityation with buocess.
Logan
khorse for theplementing dunity to incorpof the space. el consistent bheld in order tution method
ce mechanicathat has beend structural ey carried out.eeded to houuctural systemy. This will beilding inform
Gray
e arena teamesign principporate offsets There is alsobetween the tto make the cds sections th
al equipmentn designed toengineers mus The mechanse whatever m; all while ree a true test pation modeli
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
m iBUILD wantles used in ths into the rooo the opportutwo ice sheetcommunity rihat follow.
t, team iBUILD sit on the flast work very nical engineerequipment wespecting theproving whethng helps facil
posal
/2011
Veit
ts to he of line unity ts. ink a
D at
r will be her or litate
Structura
ThbowstringThere willand the mand layou
ThThe truss tension camuch smaand peak effective g(preliminamodel wilthe most intent. Asmodeling leading to
Thenough wwill be a cchanging Figure 7 busing daystructuralcompleteand L/E.
Penn S
Joe Bu
al Solution M
he structural g truss and thl be a considemechanical anut for the spac
he bowstringwill consist oable will effecaller section theight; the pgeometries, cary geometriell be built andeconomical ss the design asoftware into
o a much mor
Figure 7. Th
he lighting/elwindow and clconstant collaelevations wibelow. It sholighting and tl solutions cand by holding
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
Methods
contribution e design of flerable amounnd lighting/elece.
truss spans iof a curved gluctively take mto be used redpreliminary peconsidering aes are given id analyzed. Ssolution for thadvances a sto Revit (if posre fluid design
e dimensions in t
lectrical desiglerestory areaaborative effoill cause additould be emphthat the L/E wn be fully devnumerous we
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
to the designat roof framint of coordinaectrical engin
n the East‐Wued‐laminatemost of the mducing cost foeak height is 1ll disciplines, n Figure 6 betructural soluhe desired truructural modssible). This n process.
he picture above
gner’s input wa in the spaceort to producetional snow dasized that thwill need to developed. Thiseekly design r
1
ge 21 of 51
nroe
n of the commng to supportation and colleers in order
West direction d top chord aoment out ofor the system17 feet from twill be deterlow). Once tutions will comuss type; all wel will be buiwill allow for
will act as the bas
will be referree to meet dese the most nadrifts and winhe main intenetermine the s requires a trreviews and h
17ft
110ft Span
Logan
munity rink wt mechanical aboration ber to come up w
and is approand a tensionf the glulam tm. The truss wthe bottom ormined with inhese values ame in an iterawhile staying wlt in Revit or r consistent in
sis for which a sch
ed to frequensired daylightaturally lit spand loading on nt for this spa amount of gruly integratehaving consta
Gray
will focus on thequipment p
etween the stwith the mos
ximately 110n cable bottomtop chord, thuwill have a radof the king ponput from theare determineative process within iBUILDexported fromnterference c
hematic design wi
tly in order toting contributace while conthe structureace is to provilazing requireed design procant communi
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
he design of aplaced above.ructural engist effective de
0 feet in lengtm chord. Theus allowing fodius of curvatost. The moste CM and L/Eed a structuraand will lead
D’s integratedm the structuhecks to be m
ll be made.
o incorporatetion levels. Thnsidering howe (as shown inide cost savined before thecess and will cation betwe
posal
/2011
Veit
a . neer esign
h. e or a ture t E al d to d ural made;
e here w n the ngs e be een SE
Uto the tenkeep the aarena. Ustoward thThe structbe transpstructuralsystem. C
Khost mechmechanicgrid line XiBUILD is that residpenthous10 gives tcurrently
Dstructuralstructure part of thneeded, w
Proposelocationsby offs
stru
Penn S
Joe Bu
Figure 8. The
sing such a unth fold. The architectural sing glulam mhe wood typetural engineeorted and hol engineer in oCalculations a
nowing that thanical systemcal systems thX3 as designedproposing to e on that colue can be seenhe reader an reside.
ue to the heal engineer wilfor the addede design. Thewhich will allo
ed window s facilitated et of roof ucture
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
image above illu
nique structuuse of regionand sustaina
made of hardws found and fer must work ow it will be eorder for the and all other i
the roof over ms, team iBUhat could haved there wouldmove the scrumn line. Thn in Figure 8 bidea as to wh
avy weight ofll have to word weight of the ME can placow for the str
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
ustrates team iB
ural system canal hardwoodble strategieswoods will reqforested in thclosely with trected once oCM to compnput asked fo
the communILD will have e been placedd have been creen wall to ce existing plabelow, and iBhere the ice s
f the mechanirk meticuloushese systemsce all mechanructural engin
ge 22 of 51
nroe
BUILD’s propose
auses the strud glulam mems of the main quire the usehe productionthe CM whenon site. Somelete his craneor by the CM
nity rink, if flato look for crd on this roofcolumns on tcolumn line X4n for the comBUILD’s proposheet lies with
ical systems tsly with the Cs. The use of nical equipmeneer to easily
Logan
ed design intent
uctural enginmbers will mos arena consis of design van of the glulamn considering e assistance we analysis of twill be provi
at, would servreative solutif. If the screehe communit4 in order to mmunity rink osed solution hin the struct
that will be hoCM and ME toBIM technoloent on the rooimport these
Gray
t for the commu
eer to considst likely be usstent throughlues specificam members thow the bowwill be requirethe communitded by the st
ve as an approons as to wheen wall wouldty ice sheet. take advantaroof and meccan be seen tural grid and
oused on theo design the sogy will be heof in a host Be components
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
unity rink
er constructased in order thout the rest oally tailored o be designe
wstring truss wed of the ty rink’s roof tructural engi
opriate spaceere to put thed have been leTherefore, teage of the colchanical in Figure 9. F where colum
roof the upporting eavily used in IM model as s and coordin
posal
/2011
Veit
ability to of the
d. will
neer.
e to e eft on eam umns
Figure mns
this
nate
where thesupportinmechanic
Penn S
Joe Bu
ey lie in the stng structure lacal ductwork a
CommunRink witFlat Roo
Figure 9. ExEquipment
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
tructural gridaid out, clash and the struc
nity th of
X3
isting Rooftop Mand Screen Wal
Figure 11. resides on structure c
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
of the structdetection of tural system.
Mechanical ll Locations
Shows the ice sthe roof(X3), ancan be easily loc
ge 23 of 51
nroe
tural model. the plenum s
Existing Screen Wall Location
Existing Mechanical Equipment Locations
Possibrelocaequipmsuppo
mu
110ft Span
sheet, where thend where suppoated(X4)
Logan
Once the struspace can be
ble location for ted mechanical ment, and whereorting structure ust be added
S
Fi
Co
e screen wall cuort locations for
Gray
uctural engincarried out b
CommRink w
Curved
e
Relocated Screen Wall Location
Column Locations
igure 10. Team iEquipment an
ommunity Ice Sheet
urrently the roof
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
eer has the between the
X3 X4
14’‐8”
munity with d Roof
iBUILD Proposednd Screen Wall
posal
/2011
Veit
d Mechanical Locations
Lighting/
Thachieve sothe mechpotential we will us
Adaylight acontrolled
Hdimmer –to determThese reqhave max
Tha class 3 ilighting derequirememechanicdesigningloads and
Penn S
Joe Bu
/Electrical So
he communitome energy sanical enginewhile still keese fiberglass s
daylight studand the cost sd by strategic
igh‐bay comp– photosensormine the light quirements cox to min ratio
he total desigce hockey areesign and theents. The eleccal equipment the electrica educated as
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
olution Met
ty rink is a gresavings with deer, we will deeping the spasandwich pan
dy using Dayssavings by havcally placed ph
pact fluorescer system in orlevels and unonsist of meeof 2.5 to 1.
gn will be lessena, which is e power districtric room mat, which will bl room we wisumptions fo
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
thods
eat opportunidaylight harveetermine the ace manageabnels to diffuse
sim will be useving dimmablhotosensors.
ents will be urder to preveniformity to mting 30 horizo
s than or equa1.2 w/sq. ft. Tibution systemay need to bebe coordinateill perform a por typical load
ge 24 of 51
nroe
ity where iBUesting. By coosize of the wble to conditioe the light.
ed on the spale electric ligh
niformly laid nt abrupt chameet IES requontal footcan
al to ASHRAE The branch cm will be mode reconfigureed with the mprotective deds from the ot
Logan
UILD can take ordinating witwindows to maon. In order t
ace to determhting. The ele
out within thanges in illumuirements for ndles 3’ A.F.F.
90.1 2010 poircuits will bedeled in Revitd to adjust to
mechanical enevice coordinather spaces.
Gray
advantage oth the structuaximize the dto avoid direc
mine the amoectric light zon
he space and mination. The a category 3 , 10 vertical f
ower density e designed to t to meet NECo the movemengineer using ation study b
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
f daylighting ural engineerdaylighting ct glare on the
unt of usablenes will be
controlled byL/E will use Aice hockey arfootcandles a
requirementreflect the C 2011 ent of the Revit. Whileased on desig
posal
/2011
Veit
and and
e ice,
e
y a AGi32 rena. and
ts for
gn
Mechani
Wignore theunique felighting/e
Throofs endthe air‐harink. To alThis will riBUILD. Solocation; h
Alocation sto undersincorporalocation closses due
ComRinFla
FigureEquip
Penn S
Joe Bu
ical Solution
With the prome community el and wow flectrical, and
he column lin in the commandling units illow for simpequire a greaome room wihowever, ma
n investigatiohould have mstand how theate all membecan be closer e to distance.
mmunity nk with at Roof
e 12. Existing Ropment and Scree
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
n Methods
minence beingrink. The bowactor. This is mechanical e
ne and the roomunity rink, this on this coluler constructiat deal of collall remain whiny of the unit
on will be donminimal impace new locatioers and requirto many of th.
ooftop Mechanicen Wall Location
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
g displayed inw‐string trussgoing to requengineers.
of structure dhe line would umn line betwion and strucaboration betch will allow ts will have to
ne to find a nect on the strun for these ure a good deahe zones that
ExistinScreen WLocatio
ExistinMechanEquipmLocatio
Porelequsu
cal ns
ge 25 of 51
nroe
the structures will be used uire a great d
do not line upfall on the ice
ween the rooftural design, tween the strsome of the o be moved t
ew location foucture and benits will impaal of collabora the units han
ng Wall on
ng nical ment ons
ossible location flocated mechanuipment, and whupporting structumust be added
Logan
e of the main in the commeal of collabo
p. If a columne sheet. The cfs of the mainthe units willructural and munits to remato a new locat
or these air‐he easily accessact the architeation. iBUILD ndle reducing
for nical here ure d
RelocatedScreen WalLocation
C
C
Figure 13. TeamEquipment
Gray
n arena, iBUILmunity rink to oration betwe
line were to current plannn arena and tl be moved tomechanical coain in the currtion.
handling unitssible. A studyecture of the would like tog the amount
l
Community Rink with urved Roof
m iBUILD Propot and Screen Wa
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
LD did not wagive it its oween the struc
be placed at ned location fhe communito a new locatomponents orent planned
s. The new y will also be dbuilding. Thi
o see if the t of duct work
osed Mechanicaall Locations
posal
/2011
Veit
nt to wn tural,
the for all ty ion. of
done s will
k and
l
Dthe buildiclosely to thermal lomeasured
Aheating wheating penergy usquestionsradiantly (electricit
iBset up an the best w
Penn S
Joe Bu
aylighting is bng and for LEselect a glassoads on the icd by photosen
comparison will be used inanels (RHP). Tse while still hs that will be aheat both riny vs. gas vs. c
BUILD would aice plant. Twway to set up
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
being used inEED accreditats type that wce plant and mnsors, which w
will be done the main areThe mechanichaving a reasoanswered areks, how conscampus utiliti
also like to gewo different cothe ice plant
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
the communtion. Mechanill allow diffusmechanical ewill dim the li
on the heatinena, iBUILD wcal and CM wonable returne: will the mestructible are es).
et in touch wiompanies wilt for the Penn
ge 26 of 51
nroe
nity rink to lownical and lightsed daylight tquipment. Thights when ap
ng system in twill compare rwill work closen on investmechanical equithe two optio
ith an ice manl be contacten State Ice Are
Logan
wer some of ting/electricato enter the she daylight coppropriate.
the communiradiant floor hely to select aent and paybaipment need ons, and wha
nufacturer toed so that theena.
Gray
the energy real engineers wspace while moming into th
ity rink. Sinceheating to ova system that ack period. Soto be signific
at fuel type w
o talk about d ME can get a
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
equirements will work veryminimizing thee rink will als
e radiant floorerhead radiawill maximizeome of the cantly bigger twill be used
ifferent waysa better idea
posal
/2011
Veit
on y e so be
r nt e
to
s to of
Construc Thcrucial forinformatioiBUILD in design of same tact
Acommunittruss. Thecommunitexperiencby offsettspace. Teadevise solwill be useinvestigatwas originequipmenmechanicthe roof rfor plan v
Inconsideraprocuremwood andtruss erecthe equip
Fiand sourcwood usecommunitthat of usarena. Simconduct rbest sourcof the maclosely wi
Penn S
Joe Bu
ction Solutio
he constructir the communon exchange the design ofthe main aretics to differe
s described inty rink. The fie reason for thty rink was thce the naturating the trusseam iBUILD halutions to thised and will eltion of the conally located ont must be a pcal units curreesting on coliews of the d
n order to maations and anament, and LEEd steel, bow‐sction; and conment from th
irstly, the conces for the meed for the intety rink as weling wood andmilar to the fiesearch into ce of these mnufacturers, ith the structu
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
on Methods
on manager’snity rink as it throughout tf the communna will also bnt structural,
n the design iirst investigathe selection ohat it gave teal daylight in tes at differenas recognizeds design challliminate the pmmunity rinkon the roof aprimary area ently reside inumn line X4 resign challen
ke the designalyses must bD opportunitstring truss synclude with ahe roof.
nstruction maembers withiegrated truss ll. This has bed steel as strurst constructithe most eco
materials, the and the mateural engineer
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
s contributionis for the mathe team and nity rink. Manbe applied to t lighting/elec
ntent, team ition will be a of the bow‐stam iBUILD anhe space whit elevations t the consequenge. The useproblem of glk will be a focbove the comof focus due n the design drather than X3ge.
n changes of tbe performedies related toystem; an in‐d mechanical s
anager from tn the compossystem in theeen an importuctural materion analysis toonomical matdetails and reerial delivery r to analyze a
ge 27 of 51
nroe
n to the desigin arena. Thewill work intny of the samthe communictrical, and m
iBUILD will pefocus on the tring truss sold the end usele in use. Teato create cleaence of daylige of a fiberglaare and direccus on the relmmunity rink.to the reductdocuments. T3 as mention
the communi. These analyo the former; depth crane asystem life‐cy
eam iBUILD msite bow‐strine main arena tant design inrials in order to the main arerial selectionequirements process. The nd design spl
Logan
gn of the come constructiontensively withme constructioity rink. The dechanical sol
erform two pcomposite, wution to supper of the facilam iBUILD is warstories in wght on the iceass sandwich ct sun on the ocation of th. The relocatiotion of space his reductioned previously
ity rink possibyses include: ma detailed coanalysis; 4D pycle cost anal
must conductng truss. It is lwill be used
ntent of teamto complimenrena, the conn for the bowof the fabricaconstructionice locations
Gray
mmunity rink wn manager wih the fellow mon solution mdifference wilutions for the
rimary investwood and steport the roof lity to incorpoworking to achich light cane and has alrepanel that diice surface. Te mechanicaon of the meon the roof w
n of space hasy. Reference
ble, various comaterial seleost estimate olanning and sysis due to th
t research intlikely that theas the wood
m iBUILD fromnt the architestruction maw‐string truss,ation processn manager wiof the truss t
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
will be just asill again facilitmembers of temethods from ll be applyinge space.
tigations for tel, bow‐stringabove the orate and chieve this soln filter into theady begun toiffuses direct The second l equipment tchanical where the s occurred duFigures 5, 6, a
onstruction ction, of the compossequencing ofhe relocation
o material ope same type omembers for the beginninecture in the mnager will aga, the analyze s, the capabilill need to woto increase
posal
/2011
Veit
s tate eam the
g the
the g
lution e o light
that
ue to and 7
site, f the of
ptions of r the ng; main ain the ities rk
erection etruss will
Seteam iBUIearly stagOff, RS MorganizatiBUILD in
Therection sconstructserve as apossible pcoordinatthe size abe made programsopportunengineer wand its erebe addres
Thmechanicroof abovof the reloThis has bcost savinevaluate e
Penn S
Joe Bu
efficiency andplay a major
econd, the coILD to undersges if necessaeans Buildingion of data. Juorder to obta
he analyses tsequence in oed. The purpoanother form product to thetion and colland type of crapossible thro will allow thities for imprwill be used tection. Also, ssed before p
he final analycal system lifeve the commuocation of thebeen determings as a resultenergy saving
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
d decrease crarole in the de
onstruction mstand the costry. This, againg Constructionust as well, thain all necessa
hat follow wiorder to deveose of this stuof design reve owner for tboration withane required ugh the use oe design and ovement in tto identify anproblems androblem arises
ysis of the cone‐cycle cost anunity rink. Thie equipment ned to be an t of this changgs as well as l
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
ane requiremesign of the tr
manager will nt impact of den, will be madn Cost Data, mhis study will ary design inf
ll include a colop an undersudy is to recoview for the uhe lowest cosh the structuras well as coof BIM technoconstructionhe constructid resolve cond risks associas in the field.
nstruction manalysis due tois will requirein order to acessential rolege. The CM aong term cos
ge 28 of 51
nroe
ments. Just as russ because
need to develesign decisionde possible thmanufacturerneed to be a formation to
ombination ostanding of hognize weakneuse of team iBst. These anaral engineer onnection andologies includ team to visuion process. Cnstructability ated with the
anager for theo the relocatioe the mechanchieve the mae for the consnd the ME wist savings.
Logan
well, the wooof its specific
op a detailedns and make hrough the usr’s quotes, ancollaborativeproduce an a
of an in‐depthow this aspecesses and opBUILD, while alyses will reqon team iBUILd support conding Autodeskualize inefficieContinual inteissues with ree erection pro
e community on of the mecical engineer aximum efficstruction manill need to wo
Gray
od selection fc structural p
d cost estimatchanges to thse of Autodesnd Microsoft e effort on thaccurate cost
h crane analysct of the facilportunities inattempting touire a great dLD in an attemnditions for thk Revit and Nencies in the deraction withegard to the ocess can be i
rink will be tchanical equito have comiency of the snager in ordeork together t
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
for the bow‐sroperties.
te in order fohe design in tsk Quantity TaExcel for the e part of teamestimate.
sis and 4D truity will be n the design ao develop thedeal of mpt to determhe truss. This avisworks. Thdesign and the structuracomposite trdentified and
to perform a ipment from pleted the stsystem overar to documento understand
posal
/2011
Veit
string
r the ake‐
m
uss
and e best
mine will hese
al uss d can
the udy ll. nt the d and
Structura
1) Desiga) W
bb) Wc) D
i) d) He) Of) A
i) g) Dh) M
i) i) Hj) Pe
i) k) R
2) Desig
a) Wi)
b) Oi)
c) Ci)
d) Di)
e) Hf) Pe
Penn S
Joe Bu
al Tasks and
n a BowstringWork with MEest be located
Work with L/E esign a schem
Include in old a design r
Obtain all loadnalyze 2D mo
Obtain meesign top cho
Model design Or Import
old design reerform Clash
Use Naviswepeat steps b
n of Roof StruWork with ME
Use ME’s BObtain all addi
Weights ofreate and An
Input strucstructural
esign Roof StExport bac
old Design reerform Clash
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
d Tools
g Truss to Sup to establish d to establish matic structurRevit Model review to mads needed forodel of bowstember forces ord and bottoin Revit from Structu
eview to makeDetections bworks b through j as
ucture to Sup to determineBIM model anitional loads nf mechanical alyze 3D modcture geometdesign softwatructure and Sck to Revit, if eview Detection be
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
pport the Roohow much m
how many cleral geometry
ke sure roof schematic detring truss in Sand deflectioom tension m
ral Model if le sure design between L/E, S
s needed
pport Mechane exact mechnd link into stneeded for scequipment adel in SAP or Rtries and mecare, if link is aSupporting StLink is Availa
etween ME an
ge 29 of 51
nroe
of over the Coechanical spa
erestories wiland layout b
line modeledesign SAP/STAAD ons based on ember
ink is availabmeets idealsSE, and ME
nical Equipmeanical equipmtructural BIM chematic desis specified byRAM chanical equipavailable tructure ble
nd SE using N
Logan
ommunity Rinace is needed
ll be used andased on steps
d in step c refl
structural mo
le s of all memb
ent on Roof ment size, we model to detign y ME and CM
pment locatio
Navisworks
Gray
nk d on roof and
d schematic ds a and b
lects design in
odel and sche
ers in team iB
eight, and loctermine locat
M
ons from Revi
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
where it wou
dimensions
ntent
ematic sizes
BUILD
ations tions
it Model into
posal
/2011
Veit
uld
Lighting/
1) Dayliga) R
i) b) A
i) c) Zod) A
2) Desiga) Ab) Mc) Sed) Ae) M
3) Desiga) Db) Fic) M
4) Coorda) D
i) b) Dc) Cd) Ce) M
Penn S
Joe Bu
/Electrical So
ght Analysis un 3D AutoCA
Select glasnalyze Daylig
Work withone electric linalyze results
n Electrical Linalyze design
Model in 3D Aelect possibledd to fixture
Model in Revit
n Branch Circetermine all ill out panel bModel in Revit
dinating Electesign and size
Make typicesign and sizeoordinate witonduct prote
Model in Revit
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
olution Met
AD model in Dss with ME ght Autonomyh SE and ME tight and places and revise if
ight for Commn criteria utoCAD e fixtures, detschedule andt
cuits for Commloads boards and sizt and coordin
rical Room e main distribcal assumptioe double endth ME for locection device t
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
thods
Daysim
y results o adjust winde photosensof necessary
munity Rink Ic
termine reflecd give specific
munity Rink
ze branch circate with ME a
bution panelons about unked substationation of equipcoordination
ge 30 of 51
nroe
dow size to mor
ce
ctances, detec information
cuits and SE for cla
known loadsn pment study
Logan
maximize dayli
ermine LLFs, a to CM for co
ash detection
Gray
ighting poten
and run calcuost
n
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
ntial
lations in AG
posal
/2011
Veit
I
Mechani
1) Investa) Db) C
i) ii)iii
c) Cd) M
2) Daylig
a) Cb) Sec) D
3) Move
a) Ci) ii)
b) Dc) C
i) ii)
d) Di) ii)
e) M
4) Desiga) C
Penn S
Joe Bu
ical Tasks an
tigate heatingetermine theompare over
Select a fu) Compare ei) Select a syollaborate wi
Model in Revit
ghting investiollaborate anelect a glass tetermine the
e AHU’s from ollaborate wi
Determine) Decide whecide on locaollaborate wi
Consider a) Select newetermine the
Accessibili) Possible saModel in Revit
n the ice planontact two di
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
nd Tools
g system for te loads on thehead RHP witel type for thenergy use ofystem and conith the CM tot MEP
gation nd review daytype, minimize effect glass s
current locatith structural e if AHU’s canhich units shoations for AHUith iBUILD to architectural iw locations if e impact new ty for mainteavings in short MEP
nt for the maiifferent ice pr
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
the communie space suitabth radiant flohe RHP and sizf the two systntinue with fu help with va
ylighting resuzing the effectselection has
tion to new loto determine
n be split into uld be groupeU’s review the neimpact of locanecessary locations hav
enance rter duct runs
in arena rofessionals f
ge 31 of 51
nroe
ty arena ble for maintaor heating ze additional tems urther designlue engineeri
lts with L/E ts on the spac on loads
ocations e possible locdifferent locaed
ew location oations
ve on AHU’s
s
for help desig
Logan
aining champ
equipment f
n of the systeming
ce and ice loa
cations for AHations
of AHU’s
gning and sele
Gray
pionship ice
or the radian
m
ads as well as
HU’s
ecting equipm
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
t floor system
s glare
ment
posal
/2011
Veit
m
Construc
1) Matea) Ab) Inc) Rd) Pe
2) Perfo
a) Pei)
b) Ui)
c) Ci)
3) Perfoa) Cb) D
i) c) Im
i) d) Id
SE
4) Perfoa) R
ei)
b) C
Penn S
Joe Bu
ction Tasks a
rial selection nalyze the sonvestigate theesearch the derform a LEED
rm a detailederform a qua
Quantitiesse the quantCost informmanufactu
reate detailedQuantity a
rm an in‐depollaborate wievelop prelim
Developedmport the abo
4D model dentify inefficE to reach the
rm a life‐cycleequires ME tongineering so
ME and CM(1) Navisw
ollaborate wi
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
and Tools
investigationource of matee proximity ofdetails and reD analysis of t
d cost analysisntity take‐offs will be deteities and obtamation will beurer’s quotes d cost estimaand cost infor
th crane analith SE to deteminary schedud using Oracleove schedule will be createciencies in thee optimal con
e cost analysio finalize the olutions M will work toworks will be ith ME to per
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
n erials f materials inquirements othe material
s of compositf of truss comermined usingain cost informe obtained fro
ate of the intemation will b
lysis and 4D mermine crane ule and sequee Primavera Pinto 4D moded using Navie design and cnstruction sol
is due to mecstudy of the
ogether to acused to perfoform a mech
ge 32 of 51
nroe
relation to thof the fabricatselection and
te truss systemmponents g Autodesk Qumation om RS Means
egrated truss be combined,
modeling type and sizeence for the cP6 eling softwarsworks construction ution
chanical equipmechanical e
chieve goals uorm clash detanical system
Logan
he site tion processd sources of t
m
uantity Take‐
s Building Con
and supportiorganized, a
e based on loacrane(s)
re
sequence an
pment relocaequipment re
using BIM tectection and dm life‐cycle co
Gray
hese materia
‐Off and Revit
nstruction Co
ing frame nd analyzed i
ading and spl
d perform ite
ation elocation to o
hnology esign iteratioost analysis
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
als
t
ost Data and f
in Microsoft E
ice locations
erations with
ptimize
ons
posal
/2011
Veit
from
Excel
the
Measurin Thprovides afeatures omaterials including proud to w
Tedaylightinlight the sof it will b
Mtogether tthat couldproviding to meet a
Penn S
Joe Bu
ng Success f
he design intea memorableof the commuand shapes ua facility manwork at.
eam iBUILD ang strategies ispace and a cbe carried out
Mechanical eqto develop and come from the creative ccepted light
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
for the Comm
ent for the coe experience funity rink willused in the denager and tea
aims to providin the commuomprehensivt.
quipment relon acceptable aless ductworksolution in a t level, condit
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
munity Rink
ommunity rinfor regular an complementesign of the stam iBUILD has
de accepted liunity rink. Thve cost compa
ocation is a laand creative k and electricrationalized ftioning, and s
ge 33 of 51
nroe
k
k is to producnd first time vt the main aretructure. Thes the full inte
ight level stanhe use of daylarison of usin
rge coordinatsolution. Teacal line lengthfashion that wtructural req
Logan
ce an aesthetvisitors of the ena. Meanine rink will be nt to provide
ndards on theighting will dg this strateg
tion challengam iBUILD wihs. A successfwill provide auirements.
Gray
tically pleasin rink. The arcg, there will brun by a full te them a spac
e ice by takineter costs othgy versus not
e that brings ll look into mful solution wall requiremen
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
ng space that chitectural be similar time staff ce that they a
g advantage herwise needtaking advan
all options material cost swill also be nts for the sp
posal
/2011
Veit
re
of ded to tage
aving
pace
Design In
Thdone to gvisually enbuilding isconcoursethe floor pof the mothis east fBecause tdependinunder budthis view twill be pre
Penn S
Joe Bu
ntent for the
he east façadive an eye canjoyable spacs the Mount Ne level and hoplan can be sost eye catchifacing façade the wall is mag on the seasdget we plan to the mountesented once
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
e East Facad
de of the buildtching entrance to anyone Nittany Roomosts the curtaeen in figure ng features oand open it u
ade up primarson; if it is notto limit the atain range. We all design pa
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
de
ding will be mnce to the areon the inside
m. This space ain wall as its 11 below. Its
of the area, Mup for the occrily of glass tht properly deamount of curWith apt archiarties are con
ge 34 of 51
nroe
made up primaena from the e of the buildiis located in southern ands’ intent is to
Mount Nittanycupants whilehere will be a signed. Also,rtain wall spatectural and sidered in the
Figure 14. TNittany r
Logan
arily of a curtexterior as wng. One of tthe south‐ead eastern facepossess a stu
y. One primare keeping englarge in‐flux , in order to kace on the easengineering je design of th
he image to theroom resides on
Gray
tain wall systewell as a large the main focast corner of tes; its locatiounning view fry goal of teamgineering valuof heat lost okeep the projestern façade wjudgment, a phe space.
e left shows when the main conco
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
em. This is beopen and a
al points of ththe main n in relation tfor patrons tom iBUILD is toues in mind. or gained ect on time awhile maintaproper solutio
ere the Mount ourse level.
posal
/2011
Veit
eing
he
to o one o take
and ining on
Thnoticeableaccomplisusing resusaving enechanges cprogramssoftware involved. support thplatform tspecific mthree systCM, to en
Thfull advancost compand iBUILbelieves t
Penn S
Joe Bu
he ME and L/e energy savished with theults from releergy. There wcan be made i, which is a mplatforms the It will be thehe curtain wato ensure tha
models will eittems will all bnsure that no
he measure ontage to the vparison of all D’s alternate hat a stunnin
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
/E will be worngs while note use of advanvant softwarewill be changein Revit and tmajor advantaey can be made job of the Sall system andat what is desther be imporbe in close quinterferences
of a successfuviews of Mounsystem costsdesign. Usin
ng east facing
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
rking togethet taking anythnced lighting e packages toes made consthen the geomage of using Bde once and eE to ensure td the roof ovesigned meets rted into Reviarters and clas/clashes occ
ul design will bnt Nittany. W and some enng engineerinfaçade and i
ge 35 of 51
nroe
r concurrentlhing away froand energy mo evaluate hostantly as prometries can bBIM. Instead exported, whhat there is aer the space. the architectit (if possible)ash detectionur throughou
be an iconic eWith the help nergy saving cng judgment anterior conco
Logan
y to design a om the currenmodeling softow effective toblems are foe imported inof making thehich saves timan adequate s Also, Revit wtural ideals of) or modeled n software wiut the process
entrance and of all design comparisons and architectourse space w
Gray
space that wnt design. Thitware. The L/heir design sound and addrnto most appe changes in
me and moneystructural systwill be used af team iBUILDin Revit indell be used, wis of the desig
east facing faparties, the Cbased on thetural ideals tewill be achieve
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
will produce is will be /E and ME wilolutions are iressed. Thesepropriate modeach of the y for everyontem in place s the architecD. All design pendently. Tith the help ogn.
açade that taCM will perfore original desieam iBUILD ed.
posal
/2011
Veit
ll be n e deling
e to ctural
These of the
kes rm a ign
Structura Cinput intothe structwall syste
Figure
Thdesign. Ifaffected bwithin thecreative swill be thechanging locations unobtrusi
Instructuralcould be sby compamembersstructuralintent for
Itnot design
Penn S
Joe Bu
al Solution M
ollaborating io how the systtural engineeem. iBUILD’s
e 15. The image
he structural f needed, the by the changee curtain wallolutions incoe structural eof architectuand it is the jive as possibl
n changing thl member lensome structuaring costs for can be donel engineer and team iBUILD
is the sole rened to be sup
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
Methods
in the design tem will workr will overseepreliminary p
e above represen
engineer willSE will look ie. There are i system; this rporated as tengineer’s oblre could leadob of the strue.
e geometriesgth or total rre added. Wr the design‐tusing Revit pd CM. This wD.
esponsibility opported in a m
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
of the curtaink and why it ie and facilitatproposed des
nts team iBUILD
l take part in nto alternativintentions of will need to the design proligation to en to the additiuctural engin
s and dimensiemoval of soorking with tto‐date versuproducing a mwill be done w
of the structumanner what
ge 36 of 51
nroe
n wall systems being desige an adequatign intent can
D’s proposed des
all design chave systems anchanging thebe monitoredogresses and sure that theion of supporeer to facilita
on of the easme membershe CM the strs team iBUILDmuch more strwith the use o
ural engineer will hinder th
Logan
m, the structugned as is. In te structural sn be seen in F
sign intent for t
arrettes held nd their impae roof height ad by the strucif the curtain
e proposed sorting structureate an econom
st façade thers, and there isructural enginD’s redesign. reamlined coof proper BIM
to ensure thahe structural
Gray
ral engineer wworking withsupport systeFigure 12 belo
the east façade o
concerning tact on all struand geometrctural engineen wall systemolution is posse or changes mical solution
re may be a rs the possibilneer will eval Quantity tak
ost comparisoM modeling w
at the curtainperformance
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
will have morh the L/E and em for the curow.
of the ice arena
he curtain wactural systemies in the spaer. There cou does changesible. The in support n while being
eduction in ity that thereluate new deskeoffs of strucon for the hich is a majo
n wall system e of adjacent
posal
/2011
Veit
re ME rtain
.
all ms ace uld be e it
as
e signs ctural
or
is
systems athe reade
Figure 17. Thlocations tha
Penn S
Joe Bu
and supports.er better unde
e image on the leat support the roo
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
The followinerstand the to
ft shows existing f and eastern faça
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
ng page is como‐date design
column ade.
ge 37 of 51
nroe
mprised of son; not done by
Existing CurtaiWall ColumnLocations
Figure 16. The 3D
Figure 18
Logan
ome graphics y iBUILD.
in
D perspective abov
. The 3D perspect
Gray
(figure 13‐15
ve shows the exist
tive above shows
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
5) that may he
ting framing layou
the existing arch
posal
/2011
Veit
elp
ut for the east faç
itectural design.
ade
Lighting/
AState ice hroom thatside of thethe façade
iBtransmittaviews. In oelectric aminvestigat
Thwalk into uniform liThere willand LED sThese mo
Ththe Bryceis a game “wooden”grazed wilights to plighting warch will b
ThMax. The interior lo(.15w/sq. vertical fc
Penn S
Joe Bu
/Electrical So
s discussed inhockey arenat has views toe building is oe, there is a h
BUILD’s L/E wance but a loworder to achiembient lightinte the dayligh
he main lobbthe building, ighting with al be a glowingstrips in the cooving lights ac
he exterior ligJordan Centeand when th” arch that stth color chanprovide safetywill be a bit sube illuminated
he total desigdesign will beobby (.9 w/sqft.) as well as
c 5' A.F.F.).
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
olution Met
n the design ia. The space ro the mountaoriented on thhuge opportu
ill be workingw solar heat geve some eneng. The spaceht autonomy a
y on the nortso the “WOW
a strong emphg color changoncrete that ct as guide for
ghting ay nigher, which is acere is not a gretches acrosnging LED’s any lighting as wbtler and onld. An astrono
gn will be mode less than or. ft.) and the s meet IES gu
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
thods
ntent, the eaight along thein range. Thehe site facingnity for daylig
g very closelygain to preveergy savings, e will be modeand potential
th side of the W factor” muhasis on periping cove arouchase themser circulation a
ht needs to bcross the stregame. When tss the façade nd name of thwell as create y the essentiaomical clock w
deled in Revitr equal to ASHexterior entruidelines for lo
ge 38 of 51
nroe
stern façade e façade conte large glass fag northeast. Dght harvestin
with the ME ent increased the space wieled in 3D Aul energy savin
façade is thest be extraorpherals and hund the arenaelves as if a paround the co
e very impreseet. The exterthere is a gamwill be highlighe building wa focus for thals such as thwill control th
t and potentiHRAE 90.1 20ance (30 w/lobby and con
Logan
is a huge arctains the mainaçade that wDue to the oring.
for a choosincooling loadsll contain phoutoCAD and thngs.
e first place thdinary. This whighlighting dia, accenting oplayer is skatinoncourse as w
ssive and excrior is going tme, the majorghted. The faill be flood lithe entrance. he entrance, this non‐game
ially rendered010 power deinear foot of ncourse areas
Gray
hitectural fean lobby and traps around tentation and
ng glass that hs while still emotosensors thhen run in Da
he fans experwill be achievifferent archiof signage andng through thwell.
iting; it must o have two scr architecturaascia of the ovt. The entrancWhen there the building nlighting.
d and animatensity requiredoor width) s (5 ‐ 10 horiz
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
ature for the the Mount Nithe east and construction
has a high vismbracing thehat control thaysim to
ience when ted by non‐tectural featud advertisemhe concourse
also complemcenes, when al feature, theverhangs willce will have dis not a gamename, and the
ed in 3D Studments for theand façade ontal fc and 3
posal
/2011
Veit
Penn ttany south n of
sible e e
hey
ures. ents, .
ment there e be down e, the e
dio e
3
Mechani
Thmost visibmain arendifferent o
Thmaximumbecome vmost efficpaned, anwhile mai
ThTogether envelope factor in t
ACM and Mfor the excost. The facilities t
iBoriginal desee a consmechanicdone on t
Penn S
Joe Bu
ical Solution
he Eastern fable portion anna and commoptions as th
he ME will wom visible light very importancient type of gnd triple paneintaining iBUI
he structural the two will lwith minimathe building e
n investigatioME will work txterior. Differegoal will be tto see differe
BUILD has decesign and iBUsiderable deccal equipmentthe space to c
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
n Methods
çade of the Pnd iBUILD wanunity rink. The other areas
ork very closeinto the spacnt. Together wglass. iBUILD ed. As a team,LD’s team go
and mechanilook at the bel to no infiltraenclosure. Thi
on will be dontogether to coent types of io compare iBnt constructio
cided to loweUILD’s to showcrease in spact supplying thcompare ener
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
Penn State Icents to make ithe façade wills of focus.
ely with the Lce while limitiwith the CM, will look at se, a glass type oals.
ical engineersest way to supation. Maintais will allow fo
ne into the insome up with nsulation wilBUILD’s designon savings an
er the roof of w the difference load on thehe zones affecrgy savings iB
ge 39 of 51
nroe
e Arena is thet just as iconi require just
/E in a dayligng the effectan investigateveral differewill be select
s will work clopport the curaining the buior the best po
sulation and the most pral be comparen with a tradind energy sav
the eastern fnt advantagese mechanical cted by the roBUILD expects
Logan
e face of the bic and appealas much colla
hting study. its on the spacion will be doent types of gted that meet
osely in the srtain wall whildings vapor ossible condit
construction ctical construed for their thitional wall covings.
façade. The Ms of the loweside. This wiloof drop. Furs to achieve in
Gray
building. It is ging as the straboration bet
iBUILD wouldce load. Glassone into the mlass to includts Penn State
election of a ile maintaininbarrier will betions on the i
of the buildinuction and mahermal propeonstruction u
ME will do a stred roofline. ll allow the Mther load calcn this space.
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
going to be thructure of bottween the
d like to allows selection wimost economde fritted, doue’s design guid
support typeng a tight buile an importaice.
ng exterior. Taterial selectirties and for tsed on ice
tudy of both tiBUILD expec
ME to resize thculations will
posal
/2011
Veit
he th the
w ll
mical, uble de
e. ding nt
The ion their
the cts to he be
Construc
Thbe criticaldesign. Thcost compthe best sand The P
Ddevelop acomposesviews to Mthe visionimportantwill work various de
Cteam meewill serve address cthe space
Thmaterials feedback team iBUIof the easexample gto conditifor the strthe buildi
Indevelop vperformaprocess indesign deoriginally cost of th
Penn S
Joe Bu
ction Solutio
he responsibil to understanhe constructioparisons to vasolution with Pennsylvania
etailed in theand analyze ds the eastern Mount Nittann a team iBUILt role in the stoward achieesign solution
onstant collaetings, which as an excelleoncerns that s within the b
he first task tfor the façadand will needILD. The matest façade dueglass, this in ton the spaceructural enginng and will ne
n order to assvalue engineence and cost n order to idecisions from tdesign locatie façade syst
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
on Methods
ility of the conding the impon manager warious design regards to enState Univers
e design intenifferent desigfaçade of the
ny and be aestLD and the easelection of meving an optimns for the ben
boration amowill be facilit
ent forum in wwill affect thbuilding that
he constructide system. In d to consider erial selectionto the differiturn will effec based on theneer to develeed to be add
ist in the seleering opportuof the façade
entify the bestthe collaboraon resulted inem. Table 1 b
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
nstruction mportance of cowill be an intesolutions devngineering ansity.
nt for the eastgn geometriese ice hockey fthetically pleaastern façadematerials usedmal design, annefit of team
ong the teamtated by the cwhich the teae team and faare being inv
ion manager order to condand work clon process is ining material pct daylightinge efficiency ofop. Material dressed at the
ection of matenities for the e system. Thist solutions foation team iBUn a 37.2% redbelow illustra
ge 40 of 51
nroe
anager for teontinual desigegral part of tveloped by thalysis as well
t façade, the s and materiafacility. At theasing and ico come to fruid, as well as, dnd finally by piBUILD and th
members of construction mm members acility as a whvestigated by
will perform duct this reseosely with eacntegral to theproperties. Decapabilities wf the enclosuselection wille beginning o
erials, the condesign team s analysis willr each of the UILD to drop duction in glastes the result
Logan
eam iBUILD’s gn iterations team iBUILD ihe team. Then as the archit
primary inveal selections fe same time, nic feature oftion, the condeveloping vaproducing coshe end user.
iBUILD will omanager. Thecan brainstorhole. These mthe team.
is an in‐depthearch, the CMch of the discie entire team’epending on within the spare, as well asl be extremelof the design
nstruction ma to consider tl serve as a to building systthe roof line ss, which willt of this desig
Gray
analysis of thin order to oin this respecn, as a team, tectural inten
stigation of tfor the large cthe end goal f the facility. struction maalue engineerst estimates t
occur as a resuese scheduledrm design solmeetings will o
h analysis of tM will require iplines that a’s approach tthe selectionace, differings differing supy important fprocess.
anager will rethat will ultimool in the mattems. For exaof the east fal likely lead togn decision.
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
he east façadebtain the optct by providiniBUILD will se
nts of team iB
he main arencurtain wall tof preservingIn order to mnager will plaring solutionsto compare
ult of schedud team meetiutions and occur for eac
the selection constant re representeo the investign of materials,g mechanical pport conditiofor this aspec
esearch and mately balancterial selectiomple, prelimaçade from ito a decrease i
posal
/2011
Veit
e will timal g elect UILD
na is hat g the make ay an s that
led ngs
ch of
of
ed in gation , for loads ons ct of
e on inary ts in
The cost eteam to dincrease r
Table 1. Predesign solu
Penn S
Joe Bu
estimate will develop an icorevenue for th
eliminary glazinution
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
serve as a tooonic building fhe owner.
g comparison p
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
ol to narrow afaçade that w
ertaining to iBU
ge 41 of 51
nroe
and eventualwill attract ind
UILD's proposed
Logan
manacost eeach will ramonteamcost erepreconst
ly finalize desdividuals to th
Gray
Finally, thager will perfoestimate andof the designequire close cng each of them iBUILD in ordestimate thatesent the destruction of thsign decisionshe facility and
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
e constructioorm a detaile comparison n solutions. Thcollaboratione members oder to create t will accurateign and e façade systs, allowing thd ultimately
posal
/2011
Veit
on ed of his n of a ely
tem. e
Structura
1) Strenga) Ab) Gc) Cd) Lae) Lof) Ag) Ph) M
i) i) R
i) j) R
Penn S
Joe Bu
al Tasks and
gth Design ofs a team, devather all loadollaborate wiayout schemaook at suppornalyze and deropose struct
Model structuImport/Lin
un Clash DeteLink all dis
epeat steps e
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
d Tools
f Façade Curtavelop initial geds that may goith L/E and Matic solution frt conditions esign structurtural supportiral system in nk into Revit Aection with Ccipline modee through I as
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
ain Wall Suppeometries forovern the des
ME to develop for curtain waand evaluatere in STAAD oing system deRevit StructuArchitectureM, L/E, and Mls together necessary
ge 42 of 51
nroe
porting Structr the curtain wsign of the cuschematic faall support sye most feasiblor SAP with apesign to L/E aure
ME
Logan
ture wall systemurtain wall sysaçade designystem le solution ppropriate lond ME
Gray
stem and sup
oads
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
pports
posal
/2011
Veit
Lighting/
1) Analya) M
i) b) Wc) Rd) A
2) Desiga) Ab) Sec) Md) Ae) R
3) Desig
a) Ab) Sec) Md) Ae) Ex
Penn S
Joe Bu
/Electrical Ta
yze DaylightinModel simple
Choose glaWork closely wun in Daysim nalyze daylig
n Lobby Lightnalyze designelect possibleModel in Revitdd to fixture ender space
n Exterior Lignalyze designelect possibleModel in Revitdd to fixture xport to 3D S
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
asks and too
g geometry in 3ass with ME and C
ht and poten
ting n criteria e fixtures, dett and run calcschedule and
ghting n criteria e fixtures, dett and run calcschedule andtudio Max to
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
ols
3D AutoCAD
CM for glass p
tial energy sa
termine LLFs culations withd give specific
termine LLFs culations withd give specific render and a
ge 43 of 51
nroe
properties an
avings once e
and reflectanh Elumtools c information
and reflectanh Elumtools c informationanimate
Logan
nd cost
lectric light is
nces
to CM for co
nces
to CM for co
Gray
s designed
ost
ost
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
posal
/2011
Veit
Mechani
1) Selecta) C
i) ii)
b) Ci) ii)
c) Sed) Fu
2) Select
a) Cb) Enc) Ind) M
3) Invest
a) Ci) ii)
b) Cco
c) Di) ii)iii
4) Investa) Mb) Mc) C
i) ii)
Penn S
Joe Bu
ical Tasks an
t a type of glaompare diffe
Compare t) Investigateollaborate wi
Compare i) Compare eelect the mosurther investi
t support typollaborate winsure selectionvestigate imModel in Revit
tigate alternaompare tradi
Select diffe) Compare aollaborate wiost etermine the
Model in T) Compare ri) Determine
tigate impactModel originalModel iBUILD’ompare and d
Resize equ) Show the e
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
nd Tools
ass for the façrent types ofthe effects dife architecturaith CM to comnitial costs energy savingst economicaigate impact
e ith structural on is a tight cpact of selectt
ative insulatioitional exterioerent types oand organize ith CM to ass
e effect it will Trane Trace results with tre cost savings
t of lowering rl design in Tras solution in Tdetermine enuipment if neeenergy saving
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
çade f glass using Tfferent glass tal impact of gmpare costs
gs of the diffel selection has
in support tyonstruction ution on archit
on types or wall constrof insulation aresults ist with value
have on the
raditional exts and payback
roof ane Trace Trane Tracenergy savingseded gs in terms of
ge 44 of 51
nroe
Trane Trace antypes have onglass selection
erent types
on loads
ype using H.A.M. Ttecture
ruction with aand model the
e engineering
exterior zone
terior k period if nec
f BTU’s and m
Logan
nd thermodyn the space lon
Toolbox
alternatives em in H.A.M.
and selectio
es
cessary
money
Gray
ynamics oad
Toolbox
n based on co
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
onstructabilit
posal
/2011
Veit
ty and
Construc
1) Matea) Ab) Inc) Rd) Pe
2) Valuea) Cb) Wc) Cd) 3
i)
3) Perfoa) W
cob) U
Penn S
Joe Bu
ction Tasks a
rial selection nalyze the sonvestigate theesearch the derform a LEEDe engineering onduct resea
Will occur conM to collaborD clash detec
3D clash dNaviswork
rm a detailedWill require coost estimate tse cost estim
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
and Tools
investigationource of matee proximity ofdetails and reD analysis of tanalysis rch into final currently witrate with ME,ction and modetection will ks d cost estimatonstant collabthat will accu
mate and com
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
n (collaboratioerials f materials inquirements othe material
value engineh material se, L/E, and SE ideling will occoccur as a res
te and compaboration amourately represparisons to o
ge 45 of 51
nroe
on among all
relation to thof the fabricatselection and
eering opportlection investin order to decur throughosult of model
arison of eachng all of teamsent design anptimize desig
Logan
members of
he site tion processd sources of t
tunities tigation etermine optiout the aboveling in Revit a
h of the desigm iBUILD’s mend constructign solutions
Gray
iBUILD)
hese materia
imal design s processes amand importing
gn solutions embers in ordon of façade
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
als
olutions mong team iBg Revit model
der to create system
posal
/2011
Veit
BUILD l into
a
Measurin Ohas also bresides alpreserve atalking.
Thgoing to bEnergy sateam iBUIbe sized tDaysim wless surfac
ThiBUILD aimto see it a
Penn S
Joe Bu
ng Success f
One of the mabeen a large eong the easteall intents of
he existing debe eliminatedvings from loILD aims at elo maximize o
when investigace area to cov
he façade is tms to make aand this justifi
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
for the East
in architectuemphasis put ern façade. Tthe Mt. Nitta
esign of the e by lowering
owering the roliminating theour potential fating daylightver with glass
the face of th facility so icoies the entire
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
Facade
ral focal poinon preservinTeam iBUILD any room and
eastern façadethe roof and oof will be mee chance of evfor useful dayt harvesting fos, in turn crea
e building anonic and imprety of the faça
ge 46 of 51
nroe
ts for the areg the views inaims to enha offer a lighti
e has a considreducing theeasured usingver having glaylight. Electricor the space. ating a less ex
d in turn the ressive that thade design.
Logan
ena is the eastn the design oance the east ng feature th
derable amoue amount of sg Trance Tracare problemsc energy saviAlso by decrexpensive desi
face of the Phe arena will
Gray
t façade and of the Mt. Nitfaçade and inhat will have a
unt of wastedpace that muce. Also by lows on the ice. Tngs will be measing the vogn solution.
enn State icebring people
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
entrance. Thettany room wn doing so wiall of Penn Sta
d volume thatust be conditiwering the roThe overhangmeasured usinolume there w
e hockey proge to the arena
posal
/2011
Veit
ere which ll ate
t is oned. oof g will ng will be
gram. a just
APPENDI
Joe BuyerSteven ConroeLogan GrayAdrienne VeitTeam Member
Stev
en C
onro
e - C
onst
ruct
ion
Man
agem
ent
Log
an G
ray
- Str
uctu
ral
Joe
Buy
er -
Mec
hani
cal
iBUILD
Adr
ienn
e V
eit -
Lig
htin
g /
Ele
ctri
cal
Penn S
Joe Bu
IX A: Spring
AAAA
8-Jan-12 15-Jan-12
MechanicalConstruction
StructuralLighting/Electrical
Radiant Floor H
Load Info. for Schematic Roo
Truss Loads
Design All Electric Lig
Design All Electric Lig
S
Heating System S
Research materials & procur
Research materials & procur
Research materials & procur
LEED Opportunities
Finish Architectural Des
Schematic F
Desig
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
Schedule
Advisor: Moses LingAdvisor: John MessnerAdvisor: Andres LepageAdvisor: Richard Mistrick
22-Jan-12 29-Jan-12Heating Analysis
Lateral Frame Design & Analy
Milestone 127-Jan-12
Value Engineering Options
of Design
Mechanical Equipme
s and Sizing
Glass Selection Investigation
ght
ght
Crane AnalySchematic Roof Design
election in Stands
Support Type and Location
rement
rement
rement
Truss Detailed Estimate
Truss and Frame Detailed Estima
Glass Selection & Daylighting Stu
sign
Daylighting & Load Analysis
Crane Analy
Façade Design
Daylight Analysis & Energy Savings
gn All Electric Light
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
5-Feb-12 12-Feb-12 19-F
Design Roofs & Mech. E
Mech. Equip. Reloc
4D Truss
4D Truss
sis
13-Feb-12Milestone 2
Team iBUILD Spring Janu
Loads and
Load Analysis
Analyze & Desig
ent Selection
Clash, Modeling, Design Review
Exterior Lig
Diaphram
Electric Loads and Branch C
Electric Loads and Branch C
ysis
ate
udy
ysis
Crane Analysis
Crane Analysis
ge 47 of 51
nroe
Feb-12 26-Feb-12 4-Mar-12
Equip. Supporting Structure
cation
s Erection
s Erection
2-Mar-12Milestone 3
Semester Schedule (Proposed)uary - May 2012
Façade Detailed Estimate
Duct Sizing
s
Spri
ng B
reak
gn Facade System
ghting Design
Modeling in Revit
m Analysis
Circuit Design
Circuit Design
Logan
2 11-Mar-12 18-Mar-12 25
Modeling & Design Reviews
VE and LEED Analysis
Ice Plant Research and AnalysR
Design ReviewsR
Ice Plant Research and AnalysR
R
Electrical Equip. AnalysisR
Revisions and Renderings
Revisions and ModelingR
Protective Device Coord.
Milestone 426-Mar-12
R
Value Engineering Options
Cost Impact of Mech. Equip. RelocR
Final Collaborations a
R
Revisions and Renderings
Gray
-Mar-12 1-Apr-12 8-Apr-12
Sc
sisReport and Presentation
Facu
lty J
ury
Pres
enta
tions
: Apr
il 9
- 13
Report and Presentation
sisReport and Presentation
Report and Presentation
Report and Presentation
Report and Presentation
4
Report and PresentationcationReport and Presentation
nd Review
Report and Presentation
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
15-Apr-12 22-Apr-11
hedule LegendMain Arena
Practice ArenaEast Façade
AB
ET
Eva
luat
ions
& C
PEP
Fina
lizat
ions
: Apr
il 16
- 20
Invi
ted
Jury
Pre
sent
atio
ns /
Seni
or B
anqu
et: A
pril
27
posal
/2011
Veit
APPENDI
Penn S
Joe Bu
IX B: BIM Go
Priority (1‐3) G1‐ Most Important Va
1In(S
2 In
2Idpl
1 Re
2 As
2 El
1 Id
2 Id
2 In
1Prm
2 Re
3Inba
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
oals
oal Description
alue added objec
ncrease effectivenStructural, Mecha
ncrease effectiven
dentify concerns alanning during co
eview architectur
ssess cost involve
imate conflicts in
dentify Energy Us
dentify concerns a
ncrease effectiven
rovide an accuratmaintenance
eview Design Pro
ncrease efficiencyased on actual m
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
ctives
ness and efficiencanical, Lighting/El
ness of Sustainab
and increase efficonstruction
ral design feature
ed with design ch
n field among disc
age / Requireme
associated with s
ness of Site Utiliza
te 3D record mod
ogress
y of mechanical aeasured values
ge 48 of 51
nroe
cy of Design ectrical)
bility approaches
ciency for phase
es
hanges
ciplines
nts
ite throughout de
ation Planning
del for operation
nd electrical syst
Logan
Potential B
Design AutControl an
EngineerinEvaluation
Phase Plan
Cost Estim
Cost Estim
3D clash decoordinatioLighting / EAnalysis
esign Existing Co
Site Utiliza
andRecord Mo
Design Rev
ems Intelligent Monitoring
Gray
BIM Uses
thoring, Design Red Planning
g Analysis, LEED , Cost Estimation
nning (4D Modelin
ation, Design Rev
ation, Design Rev
etection / visualizonEnergy / Mechan
onditions Modelin
tion Planning
odeling
views
Building and/or Sg/Controls
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
eviews, 3D
n
ng)
views
views
zation /
ical
ng
System
posal
/2011
Veit
APPENDI
Figure 1: AFigure 2: PFigure 3: Dlateral loaFigure 4: Troof trussFigure 5: DFigure 6: RFigure 7: SFigure 8: iFigure 9: EFigure 10Figure 11support loFigure 12Figure 13Figure 14Figure 15Figure 16Figure 17Figure 18Table 1: F
Penn S
Joe Bu
IX C: Index o
A detail of thePreliminary sDescription oads applied toThe preliminas……………………Displays the mRaised AlumiSchematic ImiBUILD’s propExisting Rooft: Team iBUILD: Shows the icocations for t: Same as figu: Same as figu: The location: Team iBUILD: The 3D pers: The image s: Same as figuFaçade glazing
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
of Figures
e proposed inizes using theof frame lines o the buildingary size of the……………………main arena dnum Risers by
mage of bow‐sposed design top MechanicD Proposed Mce sheet, whehe roof structure 9……………ure 10…………n of the MounD’s proposed spective of thehows existingure 16…………g comparison
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
ntegrated syse described gethat will be u
g as well as we structural m……………………iaphragm, arcy Structal……string truss……intent for thecal EquipmenMechanical Eqere the screenture can be e
……………………………………………nt Nittany roodesign intente existing frag column loca…………………………………………
ge 49 of 51
nroe
stem used in teometries thaused to resisthere the trusmembers that……………………ched trusses,…………………………………………e community nt and Screenquipment andn wall currenteasily located……………………………………………om on the mat for the east ming layout fations that su……………………………………………
Logan
the main arenat explains tht thrust from tss will be suppt will be resist……………………, and infill bea……………………………………………rink…………… Wall Locatiod Screen Walltly resides on(X4)……………
……………………………………………ain concoursefaçade of thefor the east faupport the roo…………………………………………
Gray
na…………………he integrated the roof trussported by theting the thrus……………………ams………………………………………………………………………………ons………………l Locations……n the roof (X3……………………………………………………………………e level…………e ice arena……açade……………of and easter……………………………………………
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
……………………truss……………s and externae frames………st from the cu………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3), and where…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………rn façade…………………………………………………
posal
/2011
Veit
……….5 ……..6 al ……….7 urved ………7 ……….8 ……11……21 ……22 …….23 …..23 …..23 ……25 …….25 …….34 ……..36…….37 ……37 …….37 …….41
APPENDIStructura
ThMAE electBuilding Sallow for accepted factors, e
UResistant thrust indloads. Thin AE 538
Fiarena andinto the aappropria
Penn S
Joe Bu
IX D: Additiol MAE Requir
he structural tives previouStructures) wiaccurate simumodeling tecnd releases, t
sing methodsDesign of Bu
duced at the bere may be awill also be u
inally, in orded community nalysis and date limit state
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
onal Thesis Rrements
MAE requiresly taken. Knill be used extulation of struchniques and tension/comp
s of analysis fildings) the labase of the ar combinationused when de
er to accuraterink, knowledesign of the ses and criteria
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
Requiremen
ments will benowledge gaintensively in ouctural buildiassumptionspression limit
for lateral loaateral systemrch(and the ton of lateral loaesigning the la
ely design thedge from BE 4structural sysa will be satisf
ge 50 of 51
nroe
nts
e carried out ned in AE 597order to modeng performans including prots, as well as a
ding outlineds can be desigops of the fraad resisting syateral thrust a
e wooden glue462 (Design otems. Propefied.
Logan
with the use 7A (Advancedel the gravity nce. The mooperty modifany other ass
d in AE 597A agned in the mames) combinystems used;and lateral lo
ed‐laminatedof Wood Strucr adjustment
Gray
of material led Computer Mand lateral sydel will use pfiers, end offssignments nee
and AE 538 (Emain arena toned with wind; therefore, poad resisting s
d members usctures) will bet factors will b
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
earned in threModeling of ystems. Thisproper and sets, rigid‐endeded.
Earthquake o support the d and seismicrinciples outlsystems.
sed in the mae incorporatebe used and
posal
/2011
Veit
ee
s will
d
ined
ain ed
ReferencDiLaura, DApplicatio
Penn S
Joe Bu
ces David L., Kevinon. New York,
State Ice Hock
IPD/BIM The
uyer
n Houser, and, NY: Illumina
key Arena
esis
Pa
Steve Co
d Richard G. Mting Engineer
ge 51 of 51
nroe
Mistrick. The ring Society o
Logan
Lighting Hanof North Ame
Gray
dbook: Referrica, 2011. Pr
Thesis Pro
12/13/
Simi
rence & rint.
posal
/2011
Veit