ibraheem (phd) cover, etc. - connecting repositories · 2018-01-07 · providing us seeds of rice (...
TRANSCRIPT
DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION AND REGULATION OF SUCROSE TRANSPORTERS IN RICE (Orzya sativa L. cv Nipponbare) DURING
ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS CONDITIONS
A THESIS
submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PhD) BIOCHEMISTRY
DEPARTMENT OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND MICROBIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF FORT HARE
By Omodele IBRAHEEM
SUPERVISOR: Prof. G. Bradley CO SUPERVISOR: Prof. C.E.J.Botha
March, 2011
II
ABSTRACT
Plant productivity is greatly affected by environmental stresses such as drought, salinity and
insect herbivory. Plants respond and adapt to these stresses by exhibiting physiological as well as
biochemical changes at the cellular and molecular levels in order to survive. Expression of a variety
of genes which encode numerous membrane transporters have been demonstrated to be induced by
these stresses in a variety of plants. The nutritional status of plants is controlled by these
transporters, which are regulated by the transcription of the corresponding genes.
In spite of these adverse stress effects on agricultural yield, only a few studies have focused
on gene transcriptional and translational regulation of membrane transporters during environmental
stress situations. Rice, like other plants, contains a number of sucrose transporters encoded by a
family of genes. However, detailed knowledge of their roles, localization and regulation during
environmental stress conditions is lacking.
Bioinformatic tools were used to identify putative cis-acting regulatory elements that may
be involved in the regulation of rice and Arabidopsis thaliana sucrose transporters. The possible
cis-acting regulatory elements were predicted by scanning genomic sequences 1.5 kbp upstream of
the sucrose transporter genes translational start sites, using Plant CARE, PLACE and Genomatix
Matinspector professional data bases. Several cis-acting regulatory elements that are associated
with plant development, plant hormonal regulation and stress response were identified, and were
present in varying frequencies within the 1.5 kbp of 5′ regulatory region. The putative cis-acting
regulatory elements that possibly are involved in the expression and regulation of sucrose
transporter gene families in rice and Arabidopsis thaliana during cellular development or
environmental stress conditions were identified as: A-box, RY, CAT, Pyrimidine-box, Sucrose-box,
ABRE, ARF, ERE, GARE, Me-JA, ARE, DRE, GA-motif, GATA, GT-1, MYC, MYB, W-box,
and I-box.
Expression analysis was used to elucidate the role of rice (Oryza sativa L. cv Nipponbare)
sucrose transporter (OsSUT) genes during drought and salinity treatments of three week old rice
plants ( at four leaf stage) over a 10 days. Among the five rice OsSUT genes identified, only
OsSUT2 was observed to be progressively up-regulated during drought and salinity treatments,
while OsSUT1, OsSUT4 and OsSUT5 were expressed at low levels, and OsSUT3 showed no
detectable transcript expression. Sucrose transport will be essential to meet the cellular energy
demands and also for osmoprotectant activities during drought and salinity stresses. It therefore
indicates that OsSUT2 which facilitates transport of sucrose from photosynthetic cells will be
III
essential for rice plants to cope with drought and salinity stresses, and cultivars with a higher
OsSUT2 expression should be able to tolerate these environmental stresses better.
The role of OsSUT in assimilate transport during rusty plum aphids (Hysteroneura setariae;
Thomas) infestation on the leaves of three week old rice (Orzya sativa L. cv Nipponbare) cultivar
plants, over a time-course of 1 to 10 days of treatments, was also examined by combination of gene
expression and β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene analysis.
Real Time PCR analysis of the five OsSUT genes revealed that the expression of OsSUT1
was progressively up-regulated during the course of aphid infestation. OsSUT2 and OsSUT4
expression were comparatively low in both the control and treated plants. OsSUT5 showed no clear
difference in transcript expression in both control and treated plants, while no detectable transcript
expression of OsSUT3 could be found. The up-regulation of OsSUT1 gene was verified at protein
level by western blot analysis in both the control and treated plants. OsSUT1 protein expression
was found to increase with time during aphid infestation. A similar trend was noticeable in the
control plants, however at a lower expression level. These demonstrate that the cellular expression
of OsSUT1is regulated by both developmental and environmental factors.
OsSUT1-promoter:::GUS reporter gene expression was observed within the vascular
parenchyma and/or companion cells associated with phloem sieve elements of the large and small
bundles in the phloem tissues of the flag leaf blade regions where feeding aphids were confined,
which progressively increased with time of infestation. It is suggested that OsSUT1 may primarily
play an essential role in phloem transport of assimilate to wounded tissues from adjacent health
tissues or may be involved in the retrieval of assimilate back into the phloem to minimize loss
caused by the infestation. Some OsSUT1-promoter:::GUS expression was also found in the
metaxylem at 10 days after infestation, which could signify a recovery system in which sucrose lost
into the xylem as a result of aphids feeding are retrieved back into the phloem through the vascular
parenchyma. This was supported by the exposure of cut ends of matured OsSUT1-promoter:::GUS
rice plant leaf to 2% sucrose solution. OsSUT1-promoter:::GUS expression was observed within the
protoxylem, xylem and phloem parenchyma tissues. This indicates that sucrose translocating within
the xylem tissues are retrieved into the phloem via the OsSUT1 localized within the parenchyma
tissues.
In conclusion, the differential expression and regulation of rice (Orzya sativa L. cv
Nipponbare) sucrose transporters as reported here suggest that OsSUT2 and OsSUT1 were
constitutively expressed compared to other rice sucrose transporters during drought and salinity,
and rusty plum aphids (Hysteroneura setariae; Thomas) infestation stresses respectively. Thus, the
expression and regulation of the sucrose transporters could be related to the physiological and
IV
nutritional requirements of the cells during plant developmental or environmental stress state that
allows their differential expression.
V
DECLARATION
I, Omodele IBRAHEEM do hereby declear that this thesis entitled “Differential expression
and regulation of sucrose transporters in rice (Orzya sativa L. cv Nipponbare) during environmental
stress conditions” submitted for the award of the degree PhD (Biochemistry) at the University of
Fort Hare, is my own original work and has not been submitted for any degree or examination at
any other university. I further declear that all sources of my information have been quoted as
indicated in the text and/or reference list.
Omodele IBRAHEEM
VI
DEDICATION
This work is dedicated to him that controls the beginning and the end of all things, the Almighty God, and to my family.
VII
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
To God be the glory for been my alpha and omega, given me the strength and wisdom to
start and to finish this race. His name is praised forever. Amen.
I greatly appreciated the invaluable love, help and advice given to me by my supervisor,
Prof. Graeme Bradley. I will forever be grateful for the opportunity he gave me to join his research
group for my doctoral study and for the bank of knowledge which he had impacted unto me from
his years of scholastic and intellectual endeavour. I appreciate you sir and I say a very big thank
you.
I’m also grateful for the love, support and accommodation given to me by my co-supervisor,
Prof C.E.J. Botha, for the inestimable instructions that he dropped onto my ears from his well of
wisdom and of course the absolute free access to his well-stocked and equipped laboratory. Thank
you so much sir.
I’m very grateful for the assistance and accommodation given to me by Prof. Saartjie Roux
and Dr. Gill Dealtry of Department of Biochemistry & Microbiology, Nelson Mandela
Metropolitan University, South Africa, while working in their Laboratory. Thank you so much, God
bless you two.
I greatly appreciate the assistance and attention of Mr Mahboob Jimoh throughout the
course of my work. Thank you so much, God will reward you. Amen
I acknowledge the Plant Stress Response Group members; both present and past. They have
been a source of encouragement to me at all times. I pray God reward them abundantly. Amen
I acknowledge the efforts of Drs O.A. Aiyegoro and E.O Igbinosa, Department of
Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Fort Hare, for introducing me to Prof. Graeme
Bradley and processing my admission. God will reward both of you. Amen
I also will like to thank the academic members of Department of Biochemistry and
Microbiology, University of Fort Hare, and all the postgraduate students. Thank you all.
Special thanks to Mrs Leane Smith; Manager, School of Environmental and Biological
Sciences and Mrs Abimbola Badmus of the Phytomedicine Group, University of Fort Hare, for their
motherly attention and assistance at all times. God bless you and families. Amen.
VIII
In will like to thank Govan Mbeki Research and Development Centre (GMRDC) University
of Fort Hare, for their unflinching financial support; the award of a three years bursary to me and
funding of our research. Thank you very much.
I will also like to thank Bells University of Technology for granting me a study leave.
Thank you.
I will like to use this medium to express my sincere appreciation to Dr E. Obuotor and Dr
(Mrs) A. Kuku, both of Department of Biochemistry Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria, for the
fatherly and motherly role they played while preparing to come to South Africa. God in his
abundant greatness will reward both of you. Amen.
Thanks Rapheal, though we seldomly communicate while I was here, but am sure your kind
heart is always with me. God bless you and your family.
I’m also thanking the entire staff members of Department of Biochemistry, Obafemi
Awolowo University, Nigeria, for their impact in one way or the other. Surely, it was the
background training which I have gained from them all that carries me to this day. Most
importantly is Prof. Adeyinka Afolayan. Thank you sir, will forever remember and be grateful to
you.
Special thanks to Dr. R. Furbank, CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra, ACT2601, Australia for
providing us seeds of rice (Orzya sativa L. cv Nipponbare) as well as the OsSUT1 promoter::GUS
transgenic rice seeds.
I thank Lloyd E. Adams, Professor Emeritus (deceased) and Department of Entomology,
The Pennsylvania State University for allowing me to use their aphid diagram in this thesis (Figure
5.1: Characteristic feature of aphids). Thank you.
With genuineness of heart and deep sense of appreciation, I acknowledge the efforts of my
parents, Chief and Mrs R.A. Ibraheem. From my day one on earth to this day, they have been my
mirrors and gold. My prayer is for them to live long, see my good works and eat the fruits thereof
with good days of life in Jesus name. Amen.
My three delectable and gorgeous sisters: Omosalewa, Omowunmi, and Omobosinuola are
treasure in my course of life. They have all made great contribution in my life, God bless and
multiply you all in Jesus name. Amen.
Finally, all glory and adoration be to Almighty God for being with me throughout the course
of my study.
IX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………. II
DECLARATION……………………………………………………………………….. V
DEDICATION…………………………………………………………………………. VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………… VII
TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………………. IX
LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………………. XV
LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………….. XVII
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………. XVIII
BRIEF CHAPTER SYNOPSIS………………………………………………………….. XXI
CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………… 1
1.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 2
1.2 Structural Analysis……………………………………………………………… 5
1.3 Expressional Analysis…………………………………………………………… 11
1.4 Mechanism of Action…………………………………………………………….. 12
1.5 Substrate Specificity……………………………………………………………… 14
1.6 Regulation of Action…………………………………………………………….... 17
1.7 References…………………………………………………………………………. 20
CHAPTER 2: RESEARCH MOTIVATION AND HYPOTHESIS………………….. 26
2.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………. 27
2.2 Problem Statements………………………………………………………………. 27
2.2.1 Drought and Salinity……………………………………………………… 27
2.2.2 Aphid Infestation…………………………………………………………… 27
X
2.3 Hypotheses………………………………………………………………………… 28
2.4 Aim …………………………………………………………………………………. 28
2.5 Specific Objectives………………………………………………………………….. 28
2.6 Significance of Research……………………………………………………………. 29
2.7 References…………………………………………………………………………… 30
CHAPTER 3: A COMPARATIVE IN-SILICO ANALYSIS OF CIS-ACTING REGULATORY ELEMENTS IN PROMOTER REGIONS OF SUCROSE TRANSPORTER GENE FAMILIES IN RICE (Oryza sativa JAPONICA) AND ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA…………………… 32
3.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………… 33
3.2 Promoter Prediction……………………………………………………………….. 34
3.3 Core Promoter Elements…………………………………………………………... 36
3.4 Identification of Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements and Composite
Transcription Factor Modules…………………………………………………….. 37
3.5 Stress Induced/Regulated Genes…………………………………………………... 37
3.6 Specific Objective…………………………………………………………………… 38
3.7 Method……………………………………………………………………………….. 39
3.7.1 Identification of the 5́UTR of Sucrose Transporter Genes………………… 39
3.7.2 Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements Analysis…………………………………. 39
3.8 Results………………………………………………………………………………. 40
3.9 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………… 55
3.9.1 Cellular Development Associated Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements……..…. 57
3.9.2 Hormonal Regulation Associated Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements…………. 59
3.9.3 Stress Response Associated Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements…..…………… 62
3.10 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….. 67
3.11 References…………………………………………………………………………… 68
XI
CHAPTER 4: EFFECT OF DROUGHT AND SALINITY ON THE EXPRESSIONAL LEVELS OF SUCROSE TRANSPORTERS IN RICE (Oryza sativa L. cv NIPPONBARE). ………………………. 83
4.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………. 84
4.2 Specific Objective………………………………………………………………….. 85
4.3 Method……………………………………………………………………………... 86
4.3.1 Cultivation of Plant Materials and Treatment ……………………………… 86
4.3.1.1 Cultivation of rice (Orzya sativa L. cv Nipponbare) at optimum
conditions…………………………………………………………… 86
4.3.1.2 Treatment of rice (Orzya Sativa L. cv Nipponbare) ……………….. 86
4.3.1.2.1 Drought treatment………………………………………………….. 86
4.3.1.2.2 Salinity treatment…………………………………………………… 87
4.3.2 Analysis of Differentially Expressed Sucrose Transporter………………….. 88
4.3.2.1 Isolation of total RNA from controls and treated rice plants……...… 88
4.3.2.2 Amplification of sucrose transporters (SUT) genes by reverse
transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) ……………........ 89
4.3.2.3 Relative quantification of amplified SUT genes by Real-Time
PCR…………………………………………………………………… 90
4.4 Results………………………………………………………………………………….. 91
4.4.1 Effect of Treatment on Rice Plants…………………………………………… 91
4.4.2 Total RNA Extraction and OsSUTs’ Primer Pairs Confirmation…………… 92
4.4.3 Quantitative Real-Time PCR………………………………………………… 93
4.5 Discussion……………………………………………………………………………. 96
4.6 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………… 98
4.7 References…………………………………………………………………………… 99
XII
CHAPTER 5: EFFECT OF RUSTY PLUM (Hysteroneura setariae; Thomas) APHIDS
INFESTATION ON THE EXPRESSIONAL LEVELS OF SUCROSE
TRANSPORTERS IN RICE (Oryza sativa L. cv NIPPONBARE)………. 102
5.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 103
5.2 Specific Objective……………………………………………………………………… 105
5.3 Method………………………………………………………………………………..... 106
5.3.1 Cultivation of Plant Materials and Treatment ………………………………..... 106
5.3.1.1 Cultivation of rice (Orzya Sativa L. cv Nipponbare) at optimum
conditions……………………………………………………………….. 106
5.3.1.2 Maintenance of rusty plum aphids (Hysteroneura setariae; Thomas)
Colonies…. ……………………………………………………………... 107
5.3.1.3 Aphids infestation on rice (Orzya Sativa L. cv Nipponbare) ……............ 107
5.3.2 Analysis of Differentially Expressed Sucrose Transporter Genes …………….... 108
5.3.2.1 Isolation of total RNA from controls and treated rice plants……..…....... 108
5.3.2.2 Amplification of sucrose transporters (SUT) genes by reverse
transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) …………....……...... 108
5.3.2.3 Relative quantification of amplified SUT genes by Real-Time
PCR…………………………………………………………………........ 109
5.3.2.4 Isolation of total proteins from control and treated rice plants….............. 109
5.3.2.5 Monitoring the expression levels of OsSUT1 proteins by western
blot analysis and its relative quantification…………………………… 110
5.3.3 Analysis of OsSUT1:::GUS Activity Localization............................................. 111
5.3.3.1 Construction of OsSUT1:::GUS gene and transformation into rice
plant …................................................................................................... 111
5.3.3.2 Cultivation of OsSUT1:::GUS transgenic rice plants and aphid
treatment …........................................................................................... 112
XIII
5.3.3.3 Exposure of cut ends of OsSUT1:::GUS transgenic rice plant to 2%
sucrose solution……………………………….….................................. 112
5.3.3.4 Staining of transgenic rice for GUS expression ….................................. 112
5.4 Results…………………………………………………………………………………. 113
5.4.1 Total RNA Extraction and OsSUTs’ Primer Pairs Confirmation……………… 113
5.4.2 Quantitative Real-Time PCR…………………………………………………… 114
5.4.3 Western Blot Analysis and Relative Quantification of OsSUT1 Protein………. 116
5.4.4 OsSUT1:::GUS Activity Localization ………………………………………… 118
5.5 Discussion……………………………………………………………………………… 121
5.6 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………….. 124
5.7 References……………………………………………………………………………… 125
CHAPTER 6: FUTURE PROSPECT…………………………………….……………....... 130
LIST OF ARTICLES EXTRACTED FROM THESIS……………………………………… 134
APPENDICES ………………………………………………………………………………… 136 Appendix A RNA Quantification Protocol…………………………………………… 137
Appendix B OsSUTs cDNA Sequences……………………………………………… 137
Appendix C RC/DC Protein Assay Protocol. ………………………………………… 143
Appendix D OsSUTs Protein Sequences…………………………………………….. 144
Appendix E Sodium Docecyl Sulphate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
(SDSPAGE) Analysis…..……………………………………………….. 146
Appendix F 1% Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of Total RNA Extracts from Control and Stressed Rice Plants ……………………………………….. 148
Appendix G Melt Curve Analysis of OsSUTs’ Genes………………………………… 149
XIV
Appendix H Clustal W Multiple Sequence Alignment of OsSUT2, AtSUT4 and
HvSUT2…………………………………………………………..……. 150
Appendix I Copyright of Aphid Diagram Used in Thesis.……………………..….. 151
XV
LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER 1 Page Number
Figure 1.1 The path of sucrose from source to sink. …………………………………. 4
Figure 1.2 Phylogenetic tree for 48 confirmed sucrose transporter protein sequences from publicly accessible databases……………….………………………… 6
Figure 1.3 Two dimensional models of sucrose transporters for the different
subgroups. …………………………………………………………………… 10
CHAPTER 3
Figure 3.1 Map of the promoter regions of rice (Oryza sativa Japonica cultiva-group) sucrose transporter gene family………………………………………………... 44
Figure 3.2 Map of the promoter regions of Arabidopsis thaliana sucrose transporter gene family…………………………………………………………………….. 45
Figure 3.3 Illustration of the frequencies of the cis-acting regulatory elements identified in the promoter sequences of rice (Oryza sativa Japonica cultiva-group) sucrose transporter gene family……………………………………………………….. 48
Figure 3.4 Illustration of the frequencies of the cis-acting regulatory elements identified
in the promoter sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana sucrose transporter gene
family………………………………………………………………………… 49
Figure 3.5 Representation of the summation of cis-acting regulatory elements associated
with cellular development, Plant hormone, abiotic and biotic stresses in each
rice (Oryza sativa Japonica cultiva-group) and Arabidopsis thaliana sucrose
transporter gene families……………………………………………………… 57
CHAPTER 4
Figure 4.1 Greenhouse set-up of rice plants for drought experiment…………………… 87
Figure 4.2 Greenhouse set-up of rice plants for salinity experiment…………………… 88
Figure 4.3 Effect of drought and salinity on two week old rice plants, at 10 days
post treatment………………………………………………………………… 91
Figure 4.4 Representative sample of 1% agarose gel electrophoresis of total RNA extracts of (A) drought experiment (B) salinity experiment………..…………………. 92
Figure 4.5 Confirmation of RT-PCR amplification bythe various primer pairs on 1% agarose gel...…………………………………………………………………… 92
XVI
Figure 4.6 OsSUT1 melt curve analysis; a representative sample …..…………………. 93
Figure 4.7 Quantitative PCR analysis of OsSUT1, OsSUT2, OsSUT4 and OsSUT5 genes during drought treatment of rice (Orzya sativa L. cv Nipponbare) cultivar plants.………………………………………………………………... 94
Figure 4.8 Quantitative PCR analysis of OsSUT1, OsSUT2, OsSUT4 and OsSUT5 genes during salinity treatment of rice (Orzya sativa L. cv Nipponbare) cultivar plants. …………………………………………………….……….... 95
CHAPTER 5
Figure 5.1 Characteristic features of aphids ……….…………………………………….. 104
Figure 5.2 Rusty plum aphid (Hysteroneura setariae)………………………………….. 105
Figure 5.7 (A) Rusty plum aphids (Hysteroneura setariae; Thomas) maintained in insect
cage………………………………………...……………………………..... 107
(B) Rusty plum aphids (Hysteroneura setariae; Thomas) on rice leaf………… 107
Figure 5.4 Conviron set-up of rice plants for Rusty plum aphids (Hysteroneura setariae;
Thomas) infestation experiment……………………………………………… 108
Figure 5.5 Representation of OsSUT1:::GUS gene fusion construct…..………………… 111
Figure 5.6 Representative sample of 1% agarose gel electrophoresis of total RNA extracts….…...................................................................................................... 113
Figure 5.7 Confirmation of RT-PCR amplification by the various primer pairs on 1% agarose gel ……………………………………………………………………. 114
Figure 5.8 OsSUT1 melt curve analysis; a representative sample ….……………………. 114
Figure 5.9 Quantitative PCR analysis of OsSUT1, OsSUT2 and OsSUT4 genes during Rusty plum aphids (Hysteroneura setariae; Thomas) infestation on rice (Orzya sativa L. cv Nipponbare) cultivar plants …..………………………….. 115
Figure 5.10: Western blotting analysis and relative quantification of OsSUT1protein in rice (Orzya sativa L. cv Nipponbare) cultivar plants. ………………………… 117
Figure 5.11: (A – I) Cross-sections through the mid portions of mature of rice leaf blade tissues, counterstained with ImaGene Green(TM) for the cellular localization of OsSUT1- Promoter:::GUS expression during aphid infestation…………… 119
Figure 5.12 : ( A-B) Show the effect of exposure of the cut ends of mature leaves to a 2% sucrose solution…………………………………………………………… 120
XVII
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER 1 Page Number
Table 1.1 Sucrose transporters affinity for sucrose ………………………………... 16
CHAPTER 3
Table 3.1 The BLASTN result of rice (Oryza sativa Japonica cultiva-group) and
Arabidopsis sucrose transporter gene families. …………………………… 41
Table 3.2: Location of the mRNA and CDS sequences of rice (Oryza sativa Japonica cultiva-group) and Arabidopsis thaliana sucrose transporter gene families as they appear in the different chromosomes, indicating the positions of all exons and introns…………………………………………………………….. 42
Table 3.3 Putative cis-acting regulatory elements identified in the promoter regions
of rice (Oryza sativa Japonica cultiva-group) and Arabidopsis thaliana sucrose transporter gene families……………………………………………. 46
Table 3.4 Percentage composition of cis-acting regulatory elements per 300 base pair
up-stream of 5́UTR of rice (Oryza Sativa) and Arabidopsis thaliana sucrose transporter genes……………………………………………………………….. 52
Table 3.5 The clustal-W multiple sequence alignment of rice (Oryza sativa Japonica
cultiva-group) and Arabidopsis thaliana sucrose transporter gene families.…… 53 Table 3.6: The clustal-W multiple sequence alignment of rice (Oryza sativa Japonica
cultiva-group) sucrose transporter protein sequences …………………………… 54 Table 3.7: The clustal-W multiple sequence alignment of Arabidopsis thaliana sucrose
transporter protein sequences ……………………………………………………. 54
CHAPTER 4
Table 4.1 Rice sucrose transporter primer pairs………………………………………….. 89
XVIII
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ABA Abscisic acid
APS Ammonium persulphate
AU Arbitrary Unit
BLAST Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
Bp Base Pairs
CC Companion Cell
cDNA Complementary Deoxyribonucleic Acid
ESTs Expressed Sequence Tags
ET Ethylene
GUS β-Glucuronidase
HR Hypersensitive Response
IPG Immobilised pH Gradient
JA Jasmonic Acid
kDa Kilodalton
Km Michaelis Constant
mA Milliampere
MC Mesophyll Cell
mRNA Messenger Ribonucleic Acid
NCBI National Centre For Biotechnology Information
OA Okadaic Acid
PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction
PD Plasmodesmata
PEG Polyethylene Glycol
XIX
pI Isoelectric Point
PMF Proton Motive Force
PPU Pore Plasmodesmata Unit
PR Pathogenesis Related Proteins
R gene Resistance Gene
RNA Pol II Ribonucleic acid Polymerase II
ROS Reactive Oxygen Species
RT-PCR Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
SA Salicylic Acid
SAR Systemic Acquired Resistance
SC Sink Cell
SDS Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate
SDS-PAGE Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
SE Sieve Elements
SUC Sucrose Carrier
SUT Sucrose Transporter
TEMED N,N,N’N’ tetramethylethylenediamine
TFBs Transcription Factor Binding Site
TFs Transcription Factor
TRIS Tris Hydroxyl Methyl Amino Methane
TSS Transcription Start Site
ULD Unloading Domain
Vac Vacuole
X-Gluc 5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indolyl-β-D-Glucuronide
XX
∆ψ Electrical Gradient
∆H pH Gradient
5′-UTR 5′-Untranslated Region
XXI
BRIEF CHAPTER
SYNOPSIS
XXII
CHAPTER 1:
This chapter discusses a concise but comprehensive literature review of sucrose transporters
(SUT’s) in plants in general. The structural and expressional analysis, mechanism of action,
substrate specificities and regulation of SUT’s action are discussed.
CHAPTER 2:
The overall rationale and motivation for the present study are discussed in this chapter,
followed by the hypothesis and specific objectives which this study seeks to actualize.
CHAPTER 3:
Discussed here is an inclusive comparative analysis of cis-acting regulatory elements
present within the 5́- untranslated region (5΄-UTR) of the sucrose transporter gene families in rice
(Oryza sativa Japonica cultivar - group) and Arabidopsis thaliana, using available bioinformatics
tools. The cis-acting regulatory elements were predicted by scanning 1500 base pairs upstream of
the translational start sites (ATG), using Plant CARE, PLACE and Genomatix Matinspector
professional data bases. It is assumed that these cis-acting regulatory elements may serve as target
binding sites for functional promoters for the expression and regulation of these genes.
CHAPTER 4:
Drought and salinity stresses are two major adverse abiotic stresses that pose a great
challenge to survive of plants, most especially commercial crops such as rice. In this chapter, RT-
PCR and Real- Time quantitative analyses were carried out to determine the differential expression
of individual OsSUT genes, induced by these stress treatments on 3 week 4 leaf rice (Orzya sativa
L. cv Nipponbare) plants.
CHAPTER 5:
Among plant insect pests, aphids (Hemiptera, Aphidoidae) have been reported to cause
significant damage to valuable economic cereal crops including rice, wheat, barley and oats. This
XXIII
chapter is focused on RT-PCR and Real-Time quantitative analyses of the differential expression of
individual OsSUT genes, in relation to rusty plum aphid (Hysteroneura setariae; Thomas)
infestation on 3 week 4 leaf rice (Orzya sativa L. cv Nipponbare) plants. Western blotting analysis
was used to confirm that the up-regulated OsSUT1 gene is translated into full functional protein.
Furthermore, β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene expressional analysis was used to confirm in-vivo, the
up-regulated OsSUT1 gene expression during rusty plum aphid (Hysteroneura setariae; Thomas)
infestation on 3 week, 4 leaf rice (Orzya sativa L. cv Nipponbare) plants, and also to determine the
sub-cellular localization of expression during this stress period.
CHAPTER 6:
This chapter briefly discusses future research that should be carried out in order to provide
further insight into the role of SUTs during environmental stress conditions, thus providing
information that may aid in general crop improvement.