iana – plan b dr willie black 25 march 2003. the problem icann/iana not responsive to requests...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: IANA – Plan B Dr Willie Black 25 March 2003. The Problem ICANN/IANA not responsive to requests from non- contracted ccTLDs ICANN/IANA has not agreed operational](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649f055503460f94c19f31/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
IANA – Plan B
Dr Willie Black
25 March 2003
![Page 2: IANA – Plan B Dr Willie Black 25 March 2003. The Problem ICANN/IANA not responsive to requests from non- contracted ccTLDs ICANN/IANA has not agreed operational](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649f055503460f94c19f31/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Problem• ICANN/IANA not responsive to requests from
non-contracted ccTLDs
• ICANN/IANA has not agreed operational procedures with those who need the service
• ICANN/IANA mixing policy with operations
• ICANN/IANA not costing operation clearly
![Page 3: IANA – Plan B Dr Willie Black 25 March 2003. The Problem ICANN/IANA not responsive to requests from non- contracted ccTLDs ICANN/IANA has not agreed operational](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649f055503460f94c19f31/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Current Contracts Situation • Doc – Verisign to propagate the root zone
file
• Doc – ICANN/IANA to maintain database
• ccTLDs – IANA ???
![Page 4: IANA – Plan B Dr Willie Black 25 March 2003. The Problem ICANN/IANA not responsive to requests from non- contracted ccTLDs ICANN/IANA has not agreed operational](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649f055503460f94c19f31/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ccIANA ftom Shanghai• Technical
– Schema, Authentication, Process• Legal
– Very lightweight contract (call it an MoU!) – Authority to operator to put into root– Authority to remove temporarily in extremis– Payment of costs
• Regionally distributed• Political
– Acceptance by DoC– Support of regional governments
![Page 5: IANA – Plan B Dr Willie Black 25 March 2003. The Problem ICANN/IANA not responsive to requests from non- contracted ccTLDs ICANN/IANA has not agreed operational](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649f055503460f94c19f31/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Reality• USG has renewed with ICANN (6 months+)
• USG probably not willing to distribute IANA function or have outside US
• Possibility that USG will open a tender if ICANN/IANA fails to address community needs?
![Page 6: IANA – Plan B Dr Willie Black 25 March 2003. The Problem ICANN/IANA not responsive to requests from non- contracted ccTLDs ICANN/IANA has not agreed operational](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649f055503460f94c19f31/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Possible Criteria for IANA• No interference in national policy-making
• No subjectivity judgments by IANA???
• Ring-fenced funding & Not-for-profit regime
• Separate contracts ONLY for IANA part
• Specification and Management of operating policies only by the TLD managers and IANA
• Well-defined procedures and SLAs
![Page 7: IANA – Plan B Dr Willie Black 25 March 2003. The Problem ICANN/IANA not responsive to requests from non- contracted ccTLDs ICANN/IANA has not agreed operational](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649f055503460f94c19f31/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Questions• Agree criteria with changes?
• Publish in communiqué?
• Agree technical spec? Who? How?
• Should we have dialogue with ICANN? How?
• Dialogue with other parties? Who? How?