iaea international atomic energy agency national drl programmes regional meeting on the...
TRANSCRIPT
IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency
National DRL Programmes
Regional Meeting on the Establishment and Utilization of Diagnostic Reference Levels
Kampala, Uganda, 14-18 February, 2013
John Le Heron
Radiation Protection of Patients Unit
Radiation Safety and Monitoring Section
Division for Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety
IAEA
Outline
• Experiences and approaches of 2 countries• UK
• Australia
IAEA
UK approach – radiography & fluoroscopy
• Reference:• HPA – CRCE – 034 Doses to patients from
radiographic and fluoroscopic x-ray imaging procedures in the UK – 2010 review
• CT is handled separately
IAEA
UK – Obtaining the data
• UK has a National Patient Dose Database – NPDD• Set up in 1992 by NRPB (now HPA)
• A 5 year review cycle• Data collection over a 5 year period
• Supplied from hospitals• Medical physicists mainly
• Also radiographers and radiologists
IAEA
UK – What data are collected?
• Standard forms used:• Dose per radiograph
• Dose per examination
• Data on dose, patient, location, imaging equipment, and technique
• Some fields mandatory
• Many optional fields• http://www.hpa.org.uk/Topics/Radiation/UnderstandingRadiation/
UnderstandingRadiationTopics/MedicalRadiation/
DiagnosticRadiology/diag_Npdd/
IAEA
UK – More detail on data collected
• The submission of optional data was quite generally poor
Factor % of dose measurements
Patient height 44
Patient age 38
Patient gender 34
Radiographic kV 98
AEC used or not 2
Filtration 8
Image receptor used – FS, CR, DR 94
IAEA
UK – Submitting the data
• Data were accepted in any format – paper and computer files• Most were emailed
• Using a spreadsheet for the data
IAEA
UK – Quality assurance of submitted data
• One person entered the data into NPDD
• A second person checked• Statistical analysis for each set of data
• Key parameters – dose, age, patient weight, kVp, filtration, mAs
• Mean, standard deviation, sample size, and min and max were calculated
• Outliers were investigated
IAEA
UK – Selection of data for analysis
• For a given room and procedure• At least 10 patients
• Patient size• Adults
• National protocol
• Sample mean weight in range 65 to 75 kg
• Patients in range 50 to 90 kg
• Children - UK paediatric data in NPDD about 3%• Large variation in size between new born & 15 y
• Adjusting doses to 5 standard-sized children
• 0, 1, 5, 10 15 years
• Based on thickness of body part being x-rayed
IAEA
UK – Deriving national DRLs
• Derived for those exams and procedures where dose measurements on adult patients are available from a sufficiently large sample size to be representative of national practice• At least:
• 10 hospitals;
• 20 rooms; and
• 100 patients
• DRL values are based on rounded 3rd quartile values for the distributions of room mean doses for a given exam or procedure
IAEA
UK – last cycle, Jan 2006 to Dec 2010
• 320 Hospitals• ~ ¼ of hospitals and clinic with X-ray facilities
• Dose data • For single radiographs
• 165 000 ESAK values
• 185 000 KAP values
• For complete examinations• 221 000 KAP values
• 146 000 fluoroscopy times
No. of radiograph data increased significantly over previous cycle
About 96% of ESAK values were calculated, 4% using TLD
IAEA
UK – numbers of data used in updating the DRLs
Projection No. Hospitals No. Rooms No. Patients
Abdomen AP 70 167 12 000
Chest PA 95 285 43 500
Lumbar Spine AP 80 192 5 300
Pelvis AP 84 204 9000
Projection No. Hospitals No. Rooms No. Patients
Abdomen AP 78 188 17 800
Chest PA 162 433 110 500
Lumbar Spine AP 101 206 5 500
Pelvis AP 144 305 19 000
ESD data per radiograph:
KAP data per radiograph:
IAEA
UK – national DRLs
• 38 diagnostic X-ray exams on adults
• 7 types of interventional procedures on adults
• 3 types of X-ray exams on children
IAEA
Australia
• Very large country – long distances between hospitals
• Web based approach to establishing and using DRLs
• Started with CT only
IAEA
Australia – Gathering the data – Who?
• ARPANSA (Federal Regulatory Body)
• But in consultation with:• Royal Australian & New Zealand College of Radiology
• Australian Institute of Radiography
• Australasian College of Physical Scientists & Engineers in Medicine
• Australian & New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine
• Department of Health and Aging
• State and Territory radiation protection regulators
IAEA
Australia – Gathering the data – How?
• Online survey
• Accessed via ARPANSA web page• http://www.arpansa.gov.au
• Participants (CT practices) have to register online first• Contact details
• CT scanner details
• Once registered, access to data entry sections
IAEA
Australia – Gathering the data – What?
• 6 common CT examinations• CT Head
• CT Neck
• CT Chest
• CT AbdoPelvis
• CT ChestAbdoPelvis
• CT Lumbar Spine
• 3 age groups• Adults (15+ years)
• Children (5-14 years)
• Baby/infant (0-4 years)
IAEA
But what about scan differences?
• ARPANSA defined the scan margins for each examination• Facility scan had to fall within those margins to be
included in the survey
IAEA
E.g. AbdoPelvis
• Scan region is within the red lines• Above diaphragm to
below symphysis pubis
• Gives examples• Oncology, trauma,
renal colic, abdominal pain, other pathology
• Volume based vs clinical purpose??
IAEA
E.g. Chest
• Scan region is within the red lines• Lung apices to
adrenal glands
• Gives examples• Mediastinal,
pleural, pulmonary pathology, oncology
• Volume based vs clinical purpose??
• No HRCT
IAEA
Australia – Examination data
• For each examination:• Technical parameter data on protocol settings used
on the CT scanner, including:• kVp, starting mAs, pitch
• If contrast media was used
• If dose modulation was used
• Rotation time
• Number of phases
• Helical or axial acquisition
• Detector configuration
• Reconstruction slice width, Reconstruction algorithm/kernel
• Scan field of view, Beam shaping filter
• Noise index
For all parameters, online help was given, and the entered value had to be within defined limits
IAEA
Australia – Patient dose data
• Basic dose data from 20 patients on the same CT scanner• Average CTDIvol for the examination
• Total Dose Length Product (DLP) for the exam
• Patient weight (kg)
Dose metrics from the scanner console display – not measured
Help given for exams with multiple runs – separate scans, multiple phases
A survey is based on a calendar yearDose data are able to be input in several stages
IAEA
Australia – Reporting back
• For each set of data submitted to the National DRL Database• A Practice Reference Level was calculated
(median), specific to:• Examination
• Age group
• CT scanner used
• A comparison made with national DRL• Recommendation back to the CT facility
IAEA
Australia – DRLs – what has been achieved?
• ~ 800 CT scanners
• ~ 3 000 000 CT examinations per year• At the end of 2011, there were:
• 80 registered practices in NDRLD
• 51 practices contributed 255 exam surveys of ≥ 10 patients• 4700 patients
• At the end of 2012, there were:• 173 registered practices in NDRLD
• 94 practices contributed 553 exam surveys of ≥ 10 patients• 10 100 patients
IAEA
Australia – growth in participation
IAEA
Australia – DRLs
• CT national DRLs established in 2012
• 3 age groupings
• Volume based rather than exam purpose
• All patient weights used• No selection on basis of weight
IAEA
Summary
• Two approaches• UK
• Well established with good participation rate
• 4 review cycles completed
• Australia• Early days, low participation
• CT only
• Pragmatic approach on some issues
• Dosimetry
• Age groups
• Patient weight