i n s t r u m e n t e s t r u c t u r a l e i n r o m a n i a managing structural funds the demand...

19
I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter Heil, Ph.D. Vice President National Development Agency Bucharest, December 2006

Upload: tamsyn-evans

Post on 04-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Managing Structural FundsThe Demand for Change

The case of HungaryLessons & Changes

Peter Heil, Ph.D.Vice President

National Development AgencyBucharest, December 2006

Page 2: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Topics

• Hungary - a success story?• The demand for change…

– Programming Framework– Institutions

• Lessons summarised…

Page 3: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Hungary- a Success Story?

Page 4: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

NDP 1 - Financial Performance2 683

2 467

1 100

762

0

400

800

1 200

1 600

2 000

2 400

2 800

2004.12. 2005.03. 2005.06. 2005.09. 2005.12. 2006.03. 2006.06. 2006.09.

m €

Approved by MA Contracted

Payment total Payment based on invoices

2004-2006 Framework (without local)

Page 5: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

NDP 1 – The N+2 rule1996

814

147

510

755

983

1747

587

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2004

2005

03.2

006

06.2

006

09.2

006

12.2

006

03.2

007

06.2

007

09.2

007

12.2

007

03.2

008

06.2

008

09.2

008

12.2

008

m €

n+2 targetCertified Community contributionCSF MA n+2 payment plan - Community partPayment to beneficiaries based on invoices - Community part

Page 6: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Overall Balance Sheet

• Major step towards strategic development policy

• Good overall financial performance

• Reaching all regions and social groups

• Increasing number of real success stories

• Little information on actual impact

• Excessive focus on „regularity”

• Very lengthy procedures• Lack of customer focus

++ --

Page 7: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

The demand for change

Programming Framework

Page 8: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Strengthening regional and

local potential

NDP2004-2006

Long-term objective

Improving the quality of lifeImproving the quality of life

Reducing the income gap relative to EU averageReducing the income gap relative to EU average

More economic competitiveness

Improving the use of human

resources

Better environment and more balanced

regional development

Economic Competitiveness

OP

Improving the competitiveness of

the productive sector

Increasing employment and the

development of human resources

Providing better infrastructure and

cleaner environment

Priorities

Operational Programmes

Specific objective

Technical Assistance

Agricultural and Rural

Development OP

Development of Human Resources

OP

Environment Protection and Infrastructure

OP

Regional Development OP

NDP I objectives

Page 9: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Support Schemes2004-2006

• Non-refundable grants– Key projects without competition– Open competition

Page 10: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Objectives 2007-2013

• Increased employment– Employability and activity of workers– Job creation– Improved functioning of labour market mechanisms

• Sustainable growth– Competitiveness – Lisbon– Territorial cohesion– Improved framework (legal, administrative)

• Horizontal objectives– Sustainability (environment, economic & social balance)– Equal opportunities (cohesion, social justice)

Page 11: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Support Schemes2007-2013

• Non-refundable grants– Key projects without competition– Restricted competition– Open competition– Normative support schemes

• Refundable grants

• Guarantee Funds

• Risk Capital Funds

Page 12: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Comparison - Programming

• Complex structure of objectives

• Small number of complex Ops

• Simple toolbox – varied procedures

• More straightforward set of objectives

• More OPs, but simpler• Regions on the march• Richer toolbox – standard

procedures

2004-20062004-2006 2007-20132007-2013

Page 13: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

The demand for change

Institutions

Page 14: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Institutions(2004-2006)

Managing Managing AuthorityAuthority

Managing Managing AuthorityAuthority

Managing Managing AuthorityAuthority

Managing Managing AuthorityAuthority

Managing Managing AuthorityAuthority

CSF CSF AuthorityAuthority

Paying Paying AuthorityAuthority

GOVERNMENTGOVERNMENT(Ministers)(Ministers)

IBIB IBIB IBIB IBIB

IBIB IBIB

IBIB IBIB

IBIB IBIB IBIB

Page 15: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Institutions(2007-2013)

Managing Managing AuthorityAuthority

Managing Managing AuthorityAuthority

Managing Managing AuthorityAuthority

Managing Managing AuthorityAuthority

Managing Managing AuthorityAuthority

CSF CSF AuthorityAuthority

CertifyingCertifyingAuthorityAuthority

GOVERNMENTGOVERNMENT(Ministers)(Ministers)

IBIB IBIB IBIB IBIB IBIB IBIBIBIB

AuditAuditAuthorityAuthoritySteering Comm. f.D.P.Steering Comm. f.D.P.

National Council f.D.P.National Council f.D.P.

National Development AgencyNational Development Agency

Page 16: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Comparison - Institutions

• Focus on OP level• Independence of

ministries• MAs with both strategic

and implementation tasks• Complex MA – IB

relations• Reluctance to address

wider legal environment

• Priority of government strategy

• Focus on co-ordination• MAs focussing on

strategy – IBs with more autonomy

• Standardisation of implementation

• Focus on performance• State reform

2004-20062004-2006 2007-20132007-2013

Page 17: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Lessons at a Glance

Page 18: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Lessons at a glance• Need for strong co-ordination

– … starts with planning (akciótervek)– … requires clear management relationships

• „Responsibility” and tasks to be well defined– Towards the EU Member State– Strategic, programme level Managing Authority– Financial grant manager Provide for performanc-based incentives !!!

• Simplify & Standardise! – Common management rules– Standard types for support schemes– Think of the beneficiary– Decentralise management– Do not forget the wider legal environment

Page 19: I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A Managing Structural Funds The Demand for Change The case of Hungary Lessons & Changes Peter

I N S T R U M E N T E S T R U C T U R A L E I N R O M A N I A

Thank you for your attention!

And Good Luck!