I'

I .

I

-- - -~------------------------.

Gi ologica l Survey Repor t

Geothermal Development Activiti es

(Exploration Phase)

Kilauea Middl e East Rift Zone

Estate of James Campbell Propel"ty TI~K 1-2-10:3

True/Mid-Pacific Geot hermal Venture

January, 1989

Appendix ELetter to DLNRDATED: _

II~

I

I

Attached is a report of a biological survey of the land areas to be

impacted by clearing and grading for an access road and drilling

site within the geothermal project site. The area surveyed was two

to five times larger than the dimensions of the areas to be cleared

for project activities. As indicated in the report, no endangered

species were sighted along the access road and around the first

drilling site. However, based on the survey's sighting of two

trees being considered for listing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service as endangered species (Bobea timonioides and Tetraplasandra)

along -or adjacent to the access road, the road will be deviated east

of survey stakes #48 and #58 (Figure I-A) to avoid these trees. In

addition, the drill site, AI, will be relocated east of the

originally designated site by 300 feet to avoid clearing an area of

IOhi'a a-(2) forest which contains a resident population of a native

bird (not endangered), the Hawaili 'elepaio.

Biological surveys will also be conducted in all other project sites

to be used as those sites are selected. These surveyed areas

establish a baseline of biological data for monitoring future

impacts that are the result of project activity. While numerous

exotic plants are evident along the access route and around the

first drill site periodic biological monitoring surveys will be

conducted in these areas with particular emphasis along roads and

clearings to assess the introduction or spread of existing exotic

I~I

plants in and adjacent to the cleared areas and to provide the basis

for determi ni ng the need for control measures to 1inrit further

spread of such plants. The results of the periodic follow-up

surveys and proposed methods for control of exotic plants adjacent

to areas cleared for project operations will be submitted to . DLNR

for review and approval.

During the continuation and expansion of project activities, any

areas encountered that are determined to be appropriate for

desigQ~tion as botanical sanctuaries will be reported to the land

owner as a basis for discussion with DLNR.

Water Analysis.

The D &0 also required that water samples be collected for analysis

prior to initiating drilling of th~ first well in each development

area, and after completion of well testing . A licenced water

quality testing laboratory will collect samples of water from

laboratory catchment containers for analysis in the nearest

residential area which is in a prevailing downwind direction from

the drilling site. Results will be submitted to DLNR, the Health

Department, and the County of Hawaii.

APPENDIX ELtr. to DLNRdtd-----

I,f

!

I

,

BIOLOGICAL SURVEY

OF THE

PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD

AND

WELL SITE 1

BLNR DESIGNATED GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE SUBZONE

MIDDLE EAST RIFT ZONE OF KILAUEA

PUNA DISTRICT, ISLAND OF HAWAI'I

November 14, 1987

by

Charles H: Lamoureux

Winona P. Char

Paul Higashino

Maile S. Kjargaard

PREPARED FOR:

TRUE/MID PACIFIC GEOTHERMAL VENTURE

- 1 -

INTRODUCTION

On 14 November 1987 a biological baseline survey was

conduc~ed of ~he proposed access road and well si~e 1. The road

and well si~e had recen~ly been survey d and s~aked; reference is

made ~hroughou~ ~his repor~ ~o -s~ake # __-, ~he surveyor's s~akes

placed a~ irregul r in~ervals along ~he access road.

loca~ions are indic ~ed on FIG. 1.

METHODOLOGY

ThQ s~udy cov.red ~h ar as be~ween s~ake # 48 (jus~

ou~side, or eas~ of, ~h. conserva~ion dis~ric~ boundary) and

s~ake # 67 (a~ well 8i~e 1). The orni~hologis~ proceed d in

advance of ~h. bo~ani.~s, ~o void unduQ dis~urb.nce ~o birds,

and a~ each s~ak she conduc~ed a .~andard 8-minu~. census of all

birds seen or heard.

The bo~ani.~s surv yed an area of 75 ~o 100 fee~ in wid~h

wi~h i~s cen~ r line along ~he cen~er line of ~h road alignmen~.

In ~hree places where ~he proposed road alignmen~ devia~ed ~o ~he

sou~h of ~h. surveyor'. lin. ~o avoid 9 ological hazards,

(be~w.en s~ak.s 48 and 50, wi~h • d.via~ion of 50 fee~ a~ s~ake

49; be~we n 8~ kes S5 and 57, wi~h a devia~ion of 50 fee~ a~

.~ak. 56; be~w en .~ak.s 58 and 60, wi~h a devia~ion of 150 fee~

a~ s~ake 59), ~he cen~er line of ~h. survey area followed ~he

proposed road alignmen~ ra~her ~han ~he surveyor's ~ine. A~ well

si~e 1 an area of abou~ 500 fee~ square was surveyed, cen~ered on

- 2 -

encountered were recorded, and notes made o£ their abundance.

Observations o£ vegetation tructure w~re made, including

stake 67, i.e., an area about twice as great as the proposed area

I.

I II

r

to be c~eared £or we~~ site 1. A~~ vascu~ar p~ant species

'i n£ or ma t i o n on size and condition o£ dominant tr e species,

extent o£ canopy cover, and nature and extent o£ th~ subcanopy

and understory.

RESULTS

1. FLORA

A~~ species o£ vascular plants observed are listed in

TABLE I. A total o£ 103 species and varieti~s were £ound, o£

~hich 68 were native, (51 endemic to the Hawaii n is~ands, 17

indigenous, native in Hawai'i and el ewhere), and 35 were species

introduced to Hawai'i by humans (3 by the Po~ynesian s tt~ re, 32

since European contact).

Two species were encountered which are being considered

£or listing by the U. S. Fi.h and Wildli£e Service (1980) as

endangered sp ci•• 1 Bobe. timonioides (Hook. £.) Hillebr.

and Tetrap~.s ndra hawaiiensis Gray var. hswsiiensis.

Bobea timonioides is a Category 1 species, one £or

which the Service had u££icient in£ormation to support th~

biologic 1 .ppropriatenes o£ listing, but £or which d ta still

needed to b. collected concerning the environmental and economic

impacts o£ listing and designation o£ Critical Habitat. It has

been £ound in many places in the Puna District in recent years.

- 3 -

Tetraplasandra hawaiiensis var. hawaiiensis is

a Category 2 sp cies, ~or which the Servic& had in~ormation to

support the probable appropriateness o~ listing as endangered or

threat ned, but ~or which su~~icient in~ormation was not yet

vailable to biologically support a proposed rule. It is not

currently considered a high priority item for listing since its

range has been shown to be more extensive than previously

believed.

2. VEGETATION

The vegetation o~ the Puna Geoth rmal Area had previously

been described nd m pped (Char and Lamoureux, 1985a, 1985b)

Most o~ the road and the well ite are in forest

described in earli&r reports •• Wet 'ohi'a fore t with nativ

pecie. and xotic shrubs, and delimited on the vegetation maps

in Char and Lamoureux, (1985.) a. ·ohia-a(2)·.

domin ted by 'ohi'a-lehua (three varieties o~ Metrosideros

collina), yhich ~orm8 the canopy layer. Trees are mature,

ranging ~rom 20 to 60 ~eet in height. In .ome place. the canopy

is clo.ed (>60X cover) yith most or all trees healthy, in other

places more open and many o~ the trees are dead.

ther are patches o~ 'ohi'a dieback in the ~orest.

In other yords

The more

com on subcanopy tr.e. include both nativ sp ci s, (kopiko -

Psychotri. hayaiiensis, kay.'u - Ilex anomala, and hame

- Antidesm platyphyllum), and introduced species, (guav

Psidium guajava and straYberry guava - Psidium

- 4 -

cattleianum). Tree £erns (hapu'u - Cibotium glaucum and

h pu'u 'i'i - Cibotium chamissoi) are common. The dominant

shrub throughout the area is the introduced Yeedy Malabar

melastome (Melastoma malabathricum), but some native shrubs

re rel tively common, including kanayao (Broussaisia

arguta), mamaki (Pipturus haYaiiensis), 'ohelo

(Vaccinium calycinum), Clermontia parvi£lora, and

Cyrtandra p ludosa, along yith th introduced thimbleberry

(Rubus rosae£olius). tn mor closed parts o£ the £orest the

trees, tre £er~s, and shrubs support dense masses o£ epiphytes,

including many ~ern. (listed in Table I), mosses and liveryorts.

In more open places there are ext nsive patches o£ uluh £erns

(Dicranopteris emargin ta nd D. linearis) 3 to 8 £eet deep.

BetYeen takes 64 and 66 is an area yhere the 'ohi'a

tre s re very yid ly scatt red and the uluhe £ern is

particularly den••• This area was described s 'Ohi's

Yoodl nd with uluhe. and designat d as ·ohia - uluhe· on

vegetation maps in our earlier report (Char snd Lamoureux, 1985a).

At Yell site one the 'ohi'a £or at was composed o£ £airly

small trees, 2~ to 30 ~eet tall, yith an open canopy. There vas

a dense understory o~ Malabar mel stom (about 60~ cover). This

area may have been used by humans in the past, since th only

kukui tree (Aleurites moluccana) and 'awapuhi ginger

(Zingiber 2erumbet) ye £ound were at this site.

We noted signs o£ £eral pig activity throughout the area,

and encountered one sow with young during our survey.

- 5 -

In places

•yhere pigs h Ve roo~ed, and in small open Yet areas yhere they

have YalloYed, are a number o£ introduced yeeds yhich are usually

not ~ound in undisturbed £orest. These include a £ern

(Athyriopsis japonica), broomsedge (Andropogon

virginicus), Cali~orniagras (Brachiaria mutica), Hilograss

(Paspalum conjugatum), a .edge (CyDerus haspan),

Yaterpurselane (LudYigia palustris), St.Johnsyort

(Hypericum mutilum), drymaria (Drym ria cord ta), and

~ireYeed (Erechtites valerianae£olia). A £ey mall taro

plants (Colocasia esculenta) yere ~ound in some old yalloys.

3. AVIFAUNA

See s p rate report by Kjarg~ard attached a. APPENDIX I.

ENDANGERED SPECIES

1. Bobea timonioides: Tyo tree. o£ t~is Category 1

plant Yere encounter d. One va. ju.t at the conservation

di.trict bound ry, and about 5 ~eet north o£ the surveyor's

line. At this point the road is planned to v••r southYard, and

i£ the curve to the .ou~h begins perhaps 50 £e.t outside the

conserv tion di.tric~ line, instead o~ right on the line, this

tree can be avoided. The second tree i. about 50 £eet east o£

s~ake 58 and bou~ ~ ~ee~ nor~h o£ ~h surveyor' line. The road

is planned to veer south starting at stake 58. I£ the curve to

the south yere to begin perhaps 100 ~eet east o~ stake S8 this

tree can be avoided.

- 6 -

I:2. Tetraplasandra hawaiiensisz About half a dozen trees

of this Category 2 species were found. All but one was more than

[ ~20 feet from the centerline of the proposed road should not be

damaged by road construction. The one exception is close to the

first Bobea tr e, right at th conservation district

boundary, but about 10 feet south of the surveyor's line. At

this point the road is supposed to veer southward. If, as

suggested in th paragraph above, the southward curve were to

begin 's l i g h t l y outsid the conservation district , instead of

just at th boundary, this tree could be avoided too•.

3. Ad nophoru8 periensz A special search was made for

this Category 1 pl nt. W did not ~ind any. This rea is b~low

the elevation the elevation wh re this fern is known to occur in

Puna. Also, mo t of the 'ohi'a trees in th~ area re

characterized by h ving bark that pe.ls o~f in large strips.

Since the•• trees sh d their bark regularly, they do not develop

the dense coating o~ mosses and liverworts on their bark which

forms the substrate on which A. p.riens grows.

4. Buteo solit rius: The Haw iian hawk, or 'I'o, was not

encountered during our .urvey, although it undoubtedly occurs in

the area. The proposed construction would b unlikely to have

signi~icant adverse .~~ects on th hawk population, unless nests

wer to b de.troyed. w. did not find any nests long the

proposed road or at the well site.

- 7 -

- -- -- - --- - - - - - -

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. No listed endangered species were encountered during our

survey, but three trees were £ound which could be damaged by road

construction. We recommend that, in the two places speci£ied above, the

planned southward deviation o£ the road £rom the surveyor's line

should begin a £ew £eet east o£ the places indicated on the

surveyor'. plan, thus avoiding these trees.

2. The rea now contains a large population o£ introduced

woody shrubs and tr s, particularly Malabar melastom ,

strawberry guava, and guava. It is unlikely that construction

activities will have much ££ect on their abundance or

distribution. However, ther are . sev ral other weeds that could

increase in numbers and become more wid ly distributed as a

consequenc o£ opening up the £orest as construction occurs.

These are the species currently associated with pig-di turbed

reas, such s brooms dge, Cali£orniagrass, Hilograss,

Cyperus haspan, and £ir.weed. Other we de, not now in the

area, could also enter. To void this we recommend that:

a. road construction methods should be planned to

involve a little di turbance as possible beyond the edge o£ the

road. This might include using soil and rocks £rom high points

to fill in low .s po t s rather than bulldozing them into ridges at

the sides o£ the road.

b. the well site and road margins be monitored £or weeds,

and that appropriate weed control methods b used on all cleared

- 8 -

I

Ii.I.

arltas.

~-~ -- ------------ ~----------------,

(Appropriate methods might include both mechanical

methods and judicious use o~ approved herbicides such as weed oil

or Roundup).

3. Our observations elsewh re suggest that unpaved road

margins and open roadsides are prime sites ~or weed colonization.

Most weedy species require high light intensities to grow well,I

r and such sit•• are open to ~ull sunlight. I~ such areas are kept

shaded they are less likely to be colonized by weeds. Thus as

~ew trees as possible should b. be removed ~rom roadsides.

During construction i~ tree. are simply bulldozed aside and, with

other vegetation, rocks, and soil are piled up into windrows,

these rubble pil•• will soon be covered with weeds.

construction process many 'ohi'a trees will be cut.

In the

The wood

they produce may constitute a resource valu ble enough to make it

worth selling nd trucking the logs o~~ the site, which would

signi~icantly reduce the volume o~ rubble pil•••

that you look into the ~.asibility o~ this.

We recommend

4. A lot o~ good quality tree ~ern (hapu'u and hapu'u-'i'i)

will also have to be removed during construction. The £ern logs

should b. marketable to orchid growers or nurseries, and should

more than repay the cost o~ hauling them o£~ the site. Howltver,

the top£oot or two o~ each £ern stem, containing the apical bud,

should be retained and replanted on th This would meet

the .t te requirement that any landscaping be don with native

species. Mor. importantly, it would provide a qu~ck source o~

shade on rubble piles and road margins, which should reduce the

- 9 -

. __.__ .._-- ..._ ------------------- ---- --,

we d problem.

5. We hav~ looked t the area around the proposed well sit to

see i~ there are nearby areas where clearing the site would have

d~~~erent env~ronmental impacts. Th& s~te now des~gnated is

an area o~ 'oh~' a-(2) £orest, but just to the east is a

more open 'oh~'a - uluhe woodland. Select~ng a well site in

the woodland would involve cutt~ng fewer trees than in the

£orest. How v r, the £orest at the de ignated s~te ~s

botan~cally degraded, w~th • v ry d nse understory o~ Malabar

melastome. Th uluh& £ern in th& woodland is a native Hawa~ian

sp c~ s, wh~ch re ults ~n the percentage o~ cover o£ native

spec~es being h~gher ~n the woodland than in this particular

p tch o£ forest. No rare spe~~es were ~ound in .~ther s~te.

Thus, from a botan~c 1 standpo~nt the currently de ~gnat dwell

.~te seems appropriate. On the other hand, there is a resident

population o£ a nat~v b~rd, the Haw.~'i 'elep ~o in the ~or st

site but not in the woodland. While birds are able to move to

avo~d construction ctivit~e., the 'elepa~o t nds to be

terr~tor~al in its habits and may not move as easily as som&

It wa. rare along the propos d roadway, and the

largest populat~on ncountered was at the well s~te. The

'el pa~o ~. not l~.ted as an ndangered .pec~ s. Tak~ng all th~s

into account, there is no compelling environmental reason to

shi£t the well sit a ~ew hundr d feet eastward, but you may want

to consider th~s opt~on i£ the geology o£ the s~te is as

£avorable as that at the currently designated site.

- 10 -

LITERATURE CITED

CHAR, W. P. and C. H. LAMOUREUX. 1985a. Puna Geothermal Area

Biotic Asse sment, Puna District, County o£ Hawai'i. Prepared

£or Hawaii State Department o£ Planning and Economic

Development. April 1985. 126 pp. plus appendices.

CHAR, W. P. and C. H. LAMOUREUX. 1985b. Botanical Survey o£ the

Potential Geothermal Areas in State-Owned Land in the Middle

East Ri£t Zone o£ Kilauea, Puna District, Island o£ Hawai'i.

Prep red £or True/Mid Paci£ic G othermal Venture. 41 pp.

U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1980. End ngered and

Threatened Wildli£e and Plants. Review o£ Plant Taxa £or

Listing as Endangered or Threatened. Federal Register

45(242):82480-82569.

- 11 -

TABLE 1. PLANT SPECIES CHECKLIST· -

. ... . . ':...

Families are arranged alphabetically within each of

three groups: Ferns and Fern Allies, Monocotyledons, and

Dicotyledons. Taxonomy and nomenclature ' of the 'Ferns and

Fern Allies follow Lamoureux's unpublished checklist of

Hawaiian ferns; taxonomy and nomenclature of the flowering

plants (Monocotyledons and Dicotyledons) follow St. John

(1973) except where more commonly accepted names are listed.

Hawaiian names used in the checklist are in accordance with

Porter (1972} or St. John (1973).

For each species the following information is provided:

1. Scientific name with author citation.

2. Common English or Hawaiian name, when known.

3. Biogeographic status of the species . The following

symbols are used:

E = endemic = native to the Hawaiian Islands only,

not occurring naturally elsewhere .

I indigenous = .na t i ve to . the Hawaiian Islands and

also to one or more other geographic

areas .

P = Polynesian = plants of Polynesian introduction;

all those plants brought by the

Polynesian immigrants prior to contact

with the ~estern world.

X = exotic or introduced = not native to the Hawaiian

Islands; brought hereint~ntially or

accidentally by man after Western contact.

,-, .

TABLE I.

Page 1

STATUS

ASPLENIOCEAEI Aspleniu. lobulatu. Mett.I Aspleniu. nidus L.

__ PlM GEOTHElOOl. AREA.,. D£a<L1ST: OCCESS fml) ~ I.ELl. SIIE '

pi'ipi'i-lau-aanaaana,'anali'i'ekaha

ATHYRIOCEAEX Athyriopsis japonica (Thunb.) ChingE Diplaziu. sandwic:hianu. (Presll Diels

BlEOMCEAEX Blechnu. occidentale L.

D8fETAEDTIOCEAEI Microlepia strigoY (Thi1nb.) Presl

DICK!DHOCEAEE Cibotiu. chillissoi Kaul f.E Cibotiua glauc\lll (J. SL) Hook. & Am..

~

E EliJiloglossu. alatua Gaud. var. pil'Visq~ (Skottsb.) Ands. & CrosbyE ElaP!oglossua crassifoliUII (Gaud.) And. & CrosbyE Elaphoglossua hirtua ISM.) C. Chr. var••kans (Mett.) C. Chr.E EliP!oglossUil pellucidua Gaud.E El~ogloss\lll wawrae ILuerss.) C. Chr.

IUIO£NI~

E Dicranopteris l!IU1'9inita IBrack.) Rob.I Dicranopteris linearis (BurL) Und,"",.

6~ITOCEAE

E~ hy.-noPlylloidll5 lKaulf.) Hook. & Grev.E Ad~us pil'lNtifidus Gaud.E Adenophorus taariscinus (Kaul f.) Hook. & Grev. var. tuariscinusE Ad~ tripinnatifidus Gaud.E Sra.itis tenella Kaulf.

ffflEJ«IlHYLl.E Callistopteris baldwinii l~ton) Copel.I EioncconIus.inutus IBllllle) v. d. BoschE Mecodiu. recurvu. lGaud.) Copel.E S~aerocioniUli lanceolatu. lHook. & Arn.) Copel.E S~aerocioniu. obtusu. (Hook. & Am.) Copel.

ho'i'o

blechnllll fern

pl1ai, palapalai

hapu'u-'i'ihapu'u

'ekaha-ula, hoe-a~ui

'ekaha-ula, hoe-a-Maui'ekaha-ula, hoe-~ui

'ekaha-ula, hoe-a-Maui'ekaha-ula, hoe-a~ui

uluhttuluhe

pai, ~lai-huna

kolokolo, llihini-Iua

'chi' a-ku~lai-hinahina

Palai-Iau-li'i

Page 2

STATUS OOT~ICIi. tA£E Vandenboschia cyrtotheca IHillebr.) Copel.E Vandenboschia davallioides lSaud.) Copel.

LI~

I SjilenoEris chinensis (L.) Maxon

LYaJlOl)I~

E LycopodiWl ~yllanthUII Hook. I Am.

MARAnI~

E Marattia douglasii (Presl) Baker

t£PHRa..EPI~

I NePtrolepis cordifolia 1L.) PreslI Ne~rolepis exaltab (L.) SchottX Nephrolepis lultiflOl"a lRoxb.) Jarrett ex Morton

(J)HI!B.OSSOCEAEE ~ioglosSWI pendulWl L. ssp. falcatUII (Presl) Clausen

Pa.YPODI~

I Pleopeltis th~iani Kaulf.

PSILOT~

I Psilot UII cc.planitUII s...I PsilotUII ea-planatUII XnudUIII PsilotWl nudWl 1L.) Beauv.

~I~

E Slli!lil'lllla arbuscula (Kaulf.) Spring

Tl£l..YPTERI~X Clristella d.nbb (Forsk.) Brownsey I JenyX Clristella parasitiCi (L.) levI.X Macrothelypteris torresiana (Saud.) ClingE PneuIIatopteris sandtdcensis (BriCk.) Holtt.

ARACEAEP Colocasia esculenh (L.) Schott .

X Cyperus haspan L.X Kyllingia brevifolia RoUb.I ~ina Ic1riscoides (Saud.) Kern ssp. Eyenii IKunth) Koyilllil

palai-hihi

pala'a, palapala'a

...ae-'iol.

pala, kapua' i hoki

ni' ani' au, kupukupu,' okupukupuni' ani' au, kupukupu, puohohairy SMOrd fern

, ekiha-' akolea, pakahakaha

.c>a, pipihybrid !lOa

lOa, pipi

daNny MOOdfernMOOdfern, oakfern

kalo, taro

kili'o'opu, kyllingia'uki, 'aha-niu

Page 3

STATUS IllTANIOl. IA£E Rhynchosporil lavaru. Gaud.

6RAMlrGEX Andropogon virginicus L.X Axonopus affinis ChaseX BrilChiaria .utica lFOl"5k.) StapfX OpliSEnUS hirtellus lL.) BeilUV.X PiISpiIIWl conjugatWi Berg.X PiSpillWi orbiculare FOl"5t. f.X. Sacciolepis indicil lL.) Chase

LILIOCBEE SIIiliIX s.m1Nicensis Kunth

ORCHlDOCBlEX Arundini baIIbus.1efolia lRoxb.) Lindl.X Spathoglottis plicilta Bl.

~

E Freycinetiil arboreil Gilud.

ZIMJI~

P Zingiber zl!l"\Ut lL.) Roscoe

I¥lOCYlRElEE Alyxia olivaeforlis Gilud.

OOUIF(LIOCBEE Hex ilnoAlii Hook. & Am.

E Tetraplasandra lwNit!l'l5is Gray Vi'/'. haNiit!l'l5is

CARYIJlHYl.LOCBEX DryEria cordata u.i "iUd. IX R. & S.

aJIJOSITAEI Adenoste.a lavenii lL.) Ktze.X AgeratUi conyzoides L.X AgeriltWi houstonianul Mill.

·X Eredhtites valeriinilefolia lWolf) DC.X EllpitoriWi ripariWi Regel

ERlCOCEAEE VacciniWl calycinWi ~

C(JIIO IA£kuolohia, pu'uko' iI

brOOEedgen;arrow-leaved carpetgrass~liforniagrass

honohono-kukui, basketgrassIIilU' u-Hilo, Hilo grasslIilu'u-liliki, ricegrass61lnMOOdgrass

hoi-klWliNi

buboo orchidPhilippine ground orchid

'MipUhi ku. hiNi

lIilill

kMi'u

'on.

dryIIaria, pipili

kaJlil\ilJlilnii1gll"atWI, iiiile-hohonoilgeT'iltUifirt!NeedHuaku. pallikani

'ohelo-kilu-la' au

Page ~

STAllS

ElJlK]RBI~

P Aleurites IOlua:ana (L.) Wi11d.E Antidesaa platyphyllWi Mann

GESt£RI~

E Cyrtandra paludosa Gaud. Vir'. integrifolia Hi11ebr.E Cyrtandra paludosa Gaud. Vir'. il'TOStrab St.Jdln

sunlFERAEX HypericWi lutilUII L.

LOBEl.I~

E Clerwontia hawaiiensis (Hillebr.l RockE CIl!l"8Oflt ia parviflora Gaud. ex Gray

LYTHRACBl£x CIqilN carthagenensis (Jacq.) MacbridlP

II£l.ASTtMlT~

X MelastOlli IilabathriCUII L. .

IffRSlfRE£E Myrsine lessertiana A. DC.

MYRT~

kukuihDl

St. JdlnsMOrt

'd1a-kepau

c:uPlH, puakuoli

E M1tl"OSideros co11ina (J. R. I Go Forst.) Gray var. glaberrili (levI.) Rock 'd1i' a-IehuaE Metrosideros collina (J. R. I Go Forst.) Gray var. incana (levi.) Rock 'd1i' a-1ehuaE Met\"05idRr'OS collina (J.R. 16. Font.) Gray Vir'. IiCrOphyllil Rock 'd1i'a-1ehUilX Psidilll cilttleianUII Sibil'll foru cilttleiilllUll str.c.rry guava, waiawi-, UlUilX PsidiWi cattllianuJI Sibil'll foru 1ucidWl DIg. yt11c. strawberry guava, waiawiX PsidiUII guajava L. gUilVa, kUilMi

NYCTAGlt«EAEI Pisonia Wlbe11iftra (J. R. I Go Forst.) SteL

I Ludwigia octivalvis (Jacq.) RaVInX Ludwigiil palustris (L.) Ell.

kDo11, pri III"OSe .. i 11c.water purselane

PlPERACBl£E Pe~ia cookiana C. Dc.E Pepertwia hypo1euca Miq• . var. hypollucaE PeperoIia latifolia Miq.

'ala' ala-wai-nui'ala'ala-wai-nui'ala' ala-wai-nui

Page 5 •SIATIJS OOI~ICJl. tfK

I Peperalia tetraJilylla (Forst. f.) Hook. & Am. var. tetraJilylla

X Rubus rosaefoli us SL

E Bobea tiDlioides (Hook. f.) Hillebr.E Coproga ochracea Oliver var. rockiana OliverE Souldia teninalis (Hook. & Am..) Hillelr.X Piederia foetida L.

E Psychotria haMaiiensis (Gray) Fosb. var. haMiiiensis

aJI04 tfK'ala'ala-.ai-nui

thillbleberry

, ahakeapilo, kopaIIinono

uill pilaukopiko

RUT~

E Pelea clusiaefolia Gray var. cuneata St. John &Hull

S&lXIFmmEE Broossaisia arguta ~ud. _.

lJlInllFERAEX Cantella asiatica (L.) Urban

URTlCOCEAEE Pipturus ha.aiensis l.Ivl.

alani

Asiatic pennyNOl"t, pohekula

Bliki