i. evaluation of changes in fish assemblages through...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 5
FISH CONSERVATION STUDIES
I. Evaluation of changes in fish assemblages through comparison with
past records
Monitoring the occurrence of species and their populations has been a basis for
* assessing the effects of environmental impacts (Spellerberg 1996). Fish fauna of an area
may change for reasons such as habitat alteration, pollution and over fishing. To have an
insight into the various threats that contribute to the decline of a species or an assemblage
of species, there has to be a basic data of the distribution and abundance of the species of
an area. Such information could be the basis of evaluation of past, present or future
changes in the species composition and abundance of the fish fauna.
Inspite of a number of publications on the freshwater fishes of Kerala, there have
been no attempts to compile this information since Hora & Law (1941). In this chapter,
an attempt is made to review some of the earlier work carried out prior to the present
study. An attempt is also made to compare the present findings with some of the earlier
records so as to evaluate changes that have occurred in the fish assemblages.
Discussion
Prior to the present study, about 149 species of freshwater fishes belonging to 24
families and eight orders had been recorded from Kerala, of which 73 species were
reported after the study of Hora & Law (1941) (Table 5.1). Out of these 73 species, 24
were newly described species, of which 5 species are reported from northern Kerala .
A total of 100 species were recorded by earlier workers from the rivers of
Northern Kerala (Table 5.1). In the present study a total of 96 species of fishes were
recorded from northern Kerala (Table 2.5), 14 species recorded by earlier workers were
not recorded in the present study (missing species) (Table 5.2). Two of the 'missing
species' are 'single records', i.e., not recorded by any other worker after their first record,
either from the same or any other place. They are Pangio hashai and Glyptothorax
clevissinghi.
Two of these 'missing species' are commercially important and are exploitatively
fished for food (H.periyclrensis and Channa micropeltus). Use of various destructive
methods of fishing such as explosives or poison in the rivers may be the reason for their
disappearance. Dynamiting also destroys or alters the habitats of the fishes. It was
observed that these commercially important species were mostly found in the lowland
areas. Another threat faced by this group of fish was habitat loss by sand mining, which
disturbed and destroyed the breeding grounds. This was observed in all the major rivers.
Twelve of the 'missing species' were hill stream fishes. These species were affected
mainly due to alteration in their habitats. All these species were smaller in size and were
not commercially important. Pollution and deforestation were the other threats. Many of
the highland areas in Kerala are occupied by rubber, coffee, tea and cardamom plantation,
and pesticides and herbicides runoff from these plantation affecting the fish fauna.
In the present study 10 species that are not recorded by earlier workers are
reported. Of these 2 species are new additions to the fish fauna of Kerala, viz., Tor tor
and Esomus thermoicos, 3 species viz., Puntitis parrah, P. sophore, Barilius bendelisis
are widely distributed along the lowland waters. Dayella malabaricu was not listed by
earlier workers, but this species is included in the list due to its record from moderately
high altitudes. With the inclusion of these species to the earlier list the total number of
typical freshwater fishes recorded from Kerala is coming to 110.
New species from northern Kerala
Compared to the southern Kerala the number of new species recorded from
northern Kerala was less. Indra & Rema Devi (1981) and Rema Devi & Indra (1984)
described two new species from Silent Valley (Kunthi river), Homaloptera pillai and
Garra menoni respectively.
Shaji & Easa (1995) described another new species, H. Me~ioni, from
Indekkuthodu, a tribuatty of Bhavani river at Simvani in the Western Ghats.
Easa & Shaji (1995) recorded a new species, Pangio bashai, from the Chalickal
tributary of Chaliyar river in Nilambur. Manimekalan & Das (1998) described a new
species, qbptothorax davissinghi, from Karimpuzha of Chaliyar river basin.
Other additions from northern Kerala
Rema Devi & Indra (1986) studied the fish fauna of Silent valley National Park
and added Glyptothorux annandalei to the list of fish fauna of Kerala. Easa & Basha
(1995) added 26 species to the basic list. Of these 3 species were introduced and 2
species were migratory, excluding these 5 species, the following 21 species are included
to the basic list. They are Puntius clrola, Osteocheilus brevidorsalis. 0. Nashii, Labeo
potail, L.ariza, Esomus danricus. Brachydanio rerio, Garra mcClellandi, Clarias
dussumieri, Mystus punctatus, M.armatus. Balitora mysorensis, Poecilia reticulata,
Nemacheilus nilghiriensis, N.petrubanerescui, Nsemiarmatus, N.sinuatus, Chanda
ranga, Crossocheilus periyarensis, Schismatorhyncus deraniyagali and Homaloptera
menoni.
Rema Devi et al. (1996) extended the distribution of Pangio goaenszs (Tilak) to
Kerala, and collected this species from Chaliyar river. Lal Mohan & Rema Devi (1998)
listed Chela fasciata as new addition to the fish fauna of northern Kerala. Aorichthys aor
and Heteropneustes microps are the new additions made by Amnachalam et al. (1998)
from Chaliyar riber, and they also extended the distribution of Hypselobarbus
periyarensis to northern Kerala. Shaji et al. (1995) recorded P.denisonii for the first time
from northern Kerala from Aralam Wildlife Sanctuary. Gopi (1997) extended the
distribution of Silurus wynadensis to northern Kerala, reported this species from
Chandragiri river, Kasargod.
Introduced or exotic species
Gopinath (1942) gave an account of the introduction and acclimatization of exotic
fish in the state, commencing in 1906, with the introduction of trout by the Munnar Game
Association in the Vnnan Devan Hills, lying at the north-eastem extremity of southern
Kerala. Brown trouts were introduced from Scotland between 1906-1916, while eggs of
the Rainbow Trout were obtained from the Government hatchery in Ootacamund (Ootty)
in 1918. In 1940, definite proof of the breeding of trout in the Eravikulam stream in
Hamilton's plateau was obtained (Gopinath 1942). A trout hatchery has been functioning
at Rajamalai since 1941. In 1943, Dr. Freeman transplanted Rainbow Trout fingerlingsin
the Konalar streams, near Valparai, Tamil Nadu from the Munnar High Range Zone,
Kerala (Jhingran & Sehgal 1978). In 1938, Gambusia affinis was successfully introduced
and reared in the rearing ponds near Neyyattinkara - for the purpose of malaria control
(Gopinath 1942).
Of the 30 reservoirs in Kerala, fishing, as an organised activity is being carried
out in 13 reservoirs by the Department of Fisheries, Government of Kerala. There was no
mention of the presence of any introduced species in the list of freshwater fishes of
Travancore by Hora and Law (1941). After Hora & Law (1941), some workers recorded
introduced species from the different parts of Kerala. Catla catla and Chanos chanos
were first introduced into the Periyar lake in 1946 and 1947 respectively. Catla catla was
brought from the Godavari river, while Chanos chanos from Krusadai island, Gulf of
Mannar (Chacko 1948). Subsequent studies by Zacharias et a[. (1996) and Arun et a1
(lC'96) were not able to record the two above mentioned introduced species from the
Periyar lake, but hey recorded two other exotic species Cyprinus carpio communis and
Oreochromis mossambica. Easa & Basha (1995) reported four introduced species from
the Kerala part of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve. A recent study by Thomas & Azis (1999)
reported five introduced species from Peppara Reservoir, constructed over Kararnana
river, Thiruvananthapuram District.
The present study recorded nine introduced species, of which 3 were not of Indian
origin. Cyprinus carpio communis, Catla cutla and Labeo rohita were abundant in many
reservoirs, and were also recorded in the lowland areas during the monsoon, after the
shutters of dams were opened. Oreochromis mossambica was widely distributed and
were noticed even in the hill streams, but were not recorded from the very steep streams
with high current velocity. Poecilia (Lebistes) reticulata, an aquarium fish, was also
recorded from the Periyar river. Rainbow trout (Salmo gairdnerii) was recorded from the
high altitude areas of Eravikulam National Park, Chinnar WLS and Konalar streams,
Grass Hills, Valparai. These results shows that the population of local species is showing
an alarming decrease in their number. Absence of natural enemies of the introduced
species may be the major cause for their increased survival. -
106
Table 5.1: Compiled list of freshwater fishes recorded from Northern Kerala
1 Family - Notopteridae 1 1 Notoptems notoptems (Pallas)
First record
3 1 A. bicolor bicolor McClelland + I Hora &Law (1941)
Northern Kerala
S. No.
2
Species
Order: Osteoglossiformes
~ u c h . ) I
6 H. kurali Menon & Rema Devi + Menon & Rema Devi
Order: Anguilliformes Family - Anguillidae Anguilla bengalensis
4
H & L = Species listed by Hora & Law (1941); * =Additions to Hora & Law's list ; +=Range extensions to southern or Northern Kerala
+
order: Cypriniformes Family - Cyprinidae Sub-family: Cyprininae Hypselobarbus curmuca (Ham.-
Chacko (1948)
+ Hora & Law (1941) 1
I
S. No. 62
63 64
65 66 67 68 69 70
71
72
-
+ G. hughi Silas G. gotyla stenorhynchus (Jerdon) G. jerdoni (Day) G. surendranathanii Shaji et al. Crossocheilus ~eriyarensis Menon
Family - Balitoridae I Sub-family: Balitorinae
Species
Horadandia atukorali britlani Rerna Devi & Menon Sub-family: Garrinae Garra mcClellandi (Jerdon) G. menoni Rema Devi & Indra
. . & Jacob C. latius Iatius (Ham.- Buch.) Sub-family: Schizothoracinae Lepidopygopsis typus Raj
74 75
76 77 78 79
80 81 82
1 83 I N. evezardi Dav I + IHora&Law(1941) 1
Hora & Law (1941) - Silas (1954) Zacharias el al. (1996) Hora &Law (1941) Shaji et a[. (1996)
i
36 N. monilis Hora - 87 Easa & Basha (1995) 88 N. petrubanerescui (Menon) t Easa & Basha (1 995) 89 N. semiarmatus Day * Easa & Basha (1995)
Northern Kerala
* a
I
t
H. monfana Herre H. pilIai Indra & Rema Devi
Bhavania australis (Jerdon) Balitora mysorensis Hora Travancoria jonesi Hora T. elongata Pethiyagoda & Kottelat
Sub-family: Nemacheilinae Nemacheilus botia (Ham.- Buch.) N. denisoni denisoni Day N. denisoni pambarensis Rema
1 Devi & Indra
I 1 90 1 N. striatus Day
First record
Rema Devi & Menon (1992)
Easa & Basha (1995) Rema Devi & Indra
Menon & Jacob 1 (1996) Easa & Basha (1995)
Raj (1941b)
( (1984)
+ *
+ *
1
Herre (1945) Indra & Rema Devi
Hora & Law (1941) Easa & Basha (1995) Hora & Law (1941) Pethiyagoda & Kottelat (1994)
Hora & Law (1941) +
Rema Devi & Indra
1 S. 1 Species 1 First record No. 119 120
12 1
122 123
I I 1 1 Order: Svngnathiformes I
-
GIyptothorax anamalaiensis Silas G. annandalei Hora
124
125
" - 1 Family - Syngnathidae
G. devissinghi Manimekalan & Das
G. housei Herre G. madraspatanus (Day) Order: Cyprinodontiformes
Kerala + *
Family - Belonidae Xenentodon cancila (Ham.- Buch.) Family - Aplochcilidae Aplocheilus lineatus (Val.)
Silas (1 95 1) Rema Devi & Indra
*
+
127 - 128 129 130
(1986) Manimekalan & Das (1998) Herre ( 1942) Hora & Law (1941)
+
+
Sub-family Sicydiaphinae
Hora & Law (1941)
Hora &Law (1941)
Order: Perciformes Family - Ambassidae Parambassis dayi (Bleeker)
Parambassis thomassi (Day) Ambassis nalua (Ham.- Buch.) Pseudambassis ranga (Ham.-
139
.
+ *
Hora & Law (194 1
Family - Anabantidae Anabas testudineus (Bloch) Family - Belontidae
Hora &Law (1941)
Hora & Law (1941) Hora &Law (1941) Easa & Basha (1995)
- + p
H & L - Species listed by Hora and Law (1941); (*) - Additions to the Hora and Law's
list after 1941; (+) - Range extensions to southern or northern Kerala
----- 149 ~ & ~ d o n travancoricus Hora & + 1941)
Table 5.2. Species recorded by earlier workers, but not recorded during this
study (Missing species), from northern Kerala
Nair 1 Total 100
11. Ecologically sensitive areas for long tern1 monitoring and
conservation
Due to pollution, loss of habitat, disturbance and changes in land use are the main
reasons for the decline in the populations but their cause and effect cannot easily be
demonstrated without data from monitoring and surveillance studies. For without long-
term studies it is difficult to distinguish between natural changes and those changes
caused directly or indirectly by pollution and other impacts (Spellerberg 1993).
The selection of ecologically sensitive or index areas is equally important for a long-
term monitoring programme. These areas must be the areas with outstanding natural
value for hydrological, geological and biological resoursces that should be carefully
managed (Mc Neely ef al. 1990). The first stage in the selection of ecologically sensitive
areas for long-term monitoring is the development of criteria which will satisfy the
coservational needs of the natural populations and habitats existing in that areas. In the
present study the following criteria were adopted for long term studies.
a) The selected site should have maximum diversity in fish fauna, especially threatened
species.
b) The site should have an essential habitat for the survival of one or more globally or
nationally threatened species.
C) The site must have land-scapes of outstanding value or unique habitat types preferred
by a group of fishes.
d) The site must be relatively free from disturbances that destroys the natural habitats of
fishes like pollution, deforestation, large scale illegal fi shing, sand mining.
The followir_" sites of different river systems in Kerala were selected for long term
monitoring and conservation,
1. Bharathapuzha river (Fig. 5.1)
Site: Kunthi river, subtributary of Bharathapuzha river
Location: Silent Valley National Park.
District: Palakkad
The Silent Valley National Park is entirely drained by the river Kunthi and its
tributaries. The river has unpolluted water with undisturbed riparian vegetation having
high canopy value (20.95%) except at Patharakadavu (10%) and Sirendri (10%). The
river passes through evergreen vegetation throughout its course. Bedrock, gavel,
boulders and pebbles are the most dominant substrate in most of the study sites (Easa &
Basha 1995).
A total of 12 species were reported from this area (Easa & Basha 1995 and Rema
Devi & Indra 1986). The important species recorded were; Homaloptera montana
(Nationally Important and Endangered species); Glyptothorax annandalei (Endangered
species), only known from Silent Valley and Muvattupuzha river in Kerala; Garra
menoni (Globally Important, Endemic and Endangered species), only known from
Kerala; and Homaloptera pillai (Globally Important, Endemic and Endangered species),
entirely restricted in its distribution to the Silent Valley. In the present study 18 species
were collected. Of these the following 12 species are considered as the new additions to
the fish fauna of Silent Valley; and they are as follows, Mystus armatus, M.oculatus,
Glyptothorax anamaliensis, G.madraspatanus, Nemacheilus evezardi, Bhavania
australis, Garra mcClellandi, R.daniconius, Barilius bakeri, Hypselobarbus joshuai,
Zkhudree and Osteochilus brevidorsalis. While the following three species viz, Channa
gachua, Anguilla bengalensis and Glyptothorax annandalei recorded by earlier workers
were not recorded in the present study.
The main reason for selecting this area for long-term monitoring and conservation is
the presence of rwo globally important and endemic species. Even though the stream
flows through a national park, the river should be declared as fish sanctuary to stress the
importance for the need to conserve its rare fish fauna.
2. Bharathapuzha river (Fig.5.2)
Site: Punchola, tributary of Nellipuzha
Location: 40 kms away from Palakkad
District: Palakkad
'A total of 18 species were recorded from Punchola tributary, which include,
Bhavania australis, Barilius bendelisis, Tor khudree (all are Vulnerable) and
Glyptothorax madraspatanum (Endangered). This is a typical habitat for hill stream
fishes. Major substrates are gravel, sand, pebbles and cobbles. Land use pattern is human
settlements with agricultural lands. The fish fauna of Punchola stream is under threat due
to the use of pesticides and fungicides in agricultural lands, exploitative fishing by the
locals, and the reduced bank vegetation due to large scale clearing of the riparian habitat.
Presently this area is not protected.
3. Bhavani river (Fig. 5.3)
Site: Main river and connected streams
Location: Part of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve
District: Palakkad
This area includes the main river and connected streams of the Nilgiri Biosphere
Reserve (NBR). Present and past studies have shown the richness of the fish fauna of this
area. Easa & Basha ( 1 995) conducted a survey in the Kerala part of NBR, in which they
reported 24 species from this tract. In the present study 19 species were collected. The
important species collected from this area include Garra rnenoni (Globally Important,
Endemic and Endangered species), only known from Kerala; Homaloptera menoni
(Globally Important and Endemic species, distributed only in the Pattiyar tributary of this
regi~n in the world); Balitora mysorensis (Critically Endangered species, only known
from two rivers in Kerala); Nemacheilus monilis (Critically Endangered species of
Kerala, known only from two rivers); Nemacheilus semiarmatus (Endangered species)
and also Osteochilichthys nashii, Garra gotyla stenorhynrus and Bhavania australis (all
are Vulnerable species). The areas out of the reserve forest are highly disturbed.
Pig.5.3. Nellipuzha tributary of Bharathapuzha river
4
I 1- r"' I
I'OT1'ASSEILI - rn I K M
1 -.
76" 35' Fig. 5.2. Bhavani river, Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve
4. Vytiri river (Fig. 5.4)
River: Kabini
Location: Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve
Disnict: Wayanad
Diversity of fish fauna is very high, 19 species were recorded from this area.
Major species recorded are O.nashii, Tkhudree and B.australis. A unique habitat for
1a1-ge hill stream fishes belonging to the family Cyprinidae, as this area is with heavy
water column and also with deep rocky pools with very low temperature.
The four areas mentioned above need special attention to protect not only the fish
fauna but also other aquatic organisms and their habitats from human activities. These
sites should be declared as 'fish sanctuaries'. The following are some of the
recommendations for long-term monitoring studies in these areas:-
1. The population density, distribution, habitat preference and biology of the threatened
species should be studied on a long term basis.
2. Water quality and other hydrological parameters like surface runoff, stream flows and
silt load should be regularly monitored.
3. The impact of exotic species on the native fish stock should be assessed.
4. The impact of dams on the natural spawning migration of fishes should be assessed.
5. The impact of human settlement and change in land use pattern and habitat alterations
on the fish fauna should be assessed.