hyphenating convergence chromatography with uv and ms detection for compositional, impurity and...

31
©2014 Waters Corporation 1 Hyphenating Convergence Chromatography with UV and MS Detection for Compositional, Impurity and Degradation Analysis of High Performance Electronic Materials Jane Cooper Tue 20 th May, 2014 [Click Here] - Link to Poster

Upload: waters-corporation-chemical-materials

Post on 15-Jul-2015

199 views

Category:

Science


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

©2014 Waters Corporation 1

Hyphenating Convergence Chromatography with UV and MS Detection for Compositional, Impurity and Degradation Analysis of High

Performance Electronic Materials

Jane Cooper Tue 20th May, 2014

[Click Here] - Link to Poster

©2014 Waters Corporation 2

Introduction

Background information about Liquid Crystals

Current Analytical Methods

Convergence Chromatography (UPC2)

Examples:

o Impurity and degradation analysis o Compositional analysis

Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection

©2014 Waters Corporation 3

Background - Liquid Crystals

Properties: o Some properties of liquids:

• Flow, pour like liquids and take the shape of containers o Some optical properties of solids:

• Birefringence • Optical activity

o React predictably to an electric current, enabling the control of light passage

Liquid crystal intermediates: o Building block compounds used to prepare liquid crystals

• Used in mixtures (10 to 20 singles used in a typical mixture)

©2014 Waters Corporation 4

Background - Liquid Crystals

A twisted nematic cell In the “off” state, in the absence of an electric field, the assembly is transparent to light. In the “on” state, an applied field destroys the twist of the nematic, rendering the assembly opaque. Credit: Encyclopedia Britannica. Inc.

©2014 Waters Corporation 5

Background - Liquid Crystals

Uses: o Electronic displays:

• Watches, calculators, notebooks, mobile phones, projectors, desktops monitors / TVs, viewfinders on cameras / camcorders…..

©2014 Waters Corporation 6

Current Analytical Methods

Existing methods used to characterize liquid crystal intermediate compounds:

• Differential Scanning Calorimetry • Fourier Transform Infrared • Raman Spectroscopy • Ultraviolet Absorption Spectrophotometry • Optical Microscopy

– For the impurity profiling and compositional analysis typically a

chromatographic technique would be used: • HPLC with UV detection • HPLC with MS detection • GC with MS detection

©2014 Waters Corporation 7

Current Analytical Methods

– These techniques have some limitations:

• The compounds might not be thermally stable and / or volatile

• Limited sample availability

• The sample solubility might be incompatible with the solvent required for the technique • Therefore requiring additional sample preparation stages

• Long analysis times with insufficient selectivity and sensitivity

©2014 Waters Corporation 9

Convergence Chromatography (UPC2)

Many liquid crystal intermediate compounds:

– Are not very stable at high temperatures – Have low volatility – Have similar UV spectra

Therefore, utilizing the separation powers of UPC2 with CO2 as the mobile phase is an ideal alternative to both HPLC and GC analysis

©2014 Waters Corporation 10

UPC2 Examples

Impurity Profiling Analysis

– Impurities can be present due to many factors, including contamination, as by-products, or as degradation products

– Purity is critical to ensure the optimum quality, performance and lifetime of the electronic display device

Compositional Analysis

– Composition is critical to ensure physical properties and

characteristic of the liquid crystal. o Even just small changes can have pronounced effects

©2014 Waters Corporation 11

Liquid Crystal Intermediate Compounds

4-(Octyloxy)benzoic acid

4-Butoxybenzoic acid

4-Cyanobenzoic acid

4,4′-Azoxyanisole-d14

(internal standard)

4-Butylbenzoic acid

4-Octylbenzoic acid

©2014 Waters Corporation 12

Methods

UPC2 conditions CCM back pressure: 2000 psi Sample temp.: 20 oC Column temp.: 50 oC Injection volume: 1 µL Column: ACQUITY UPC2 CSH Fluoro-phenyl, 3.0 mm x 100 mm, 1.7 µm Mobile phase A: CO2 Mobile phase B: Methanol (2% Formic Acid + 15 mM ammonium acetate) PDA conditions UV system: ACQUITY UPC2 PDA Detector Range : 210 to 450 nm Resolution: 1.2 nm Sampling rate: 20 pts/sec Filter time constant: Slow (0.2 sec)

©2014 Waters Corporation 13

Liquid Crystal Intermediate Compounds

Chemical Substance CAS

Number

Retention time

(minutes)

UV optimum absorbance

(nm)

4,4′-Azoxyanisole-d14 39750-11-3 0.69 346

4-Butylbenzoic acid 20651-71-2 1.39 235

4-Octylbenzoic acid 3575-31-3 1.62 235

4-Cyanobenzoic acid 3575-31-3 1.75 252

4-Butoxybenzoic acid 1498-96-0 1.90 252

4-(Octyloxy)benzoic acid 2493-84-7 2.09 235

©2014 Waters Corporation 14

Calibration Curve

©2014 Waters Corporation 15

UV Chromatograms and UV Spectra

©2014 Waters Corporation 16

252 nm

235 nm

346 nm

4-Cyanobenzoic acid (0.001 mg/mL)

4-Butylbenzoic acid (1 mg/mL)

4,4′-Azoxyanisole-d14 (internal standard)

4-(Octyloxy) benzoic acid (0.001 mg/mL)

4-Butoxybenzoic acid (0.001 mg/mL)

Impurity Profiling

©2014 Waters Corporation 17

Liquid Crystal Intermediate Compounds Merck E7 (liquid crystal intermediate compounds)

4-cyano-4'-n-pentyl-biphenyl

4-cyano-4'-n-heptyl-biphenyl

C18H19N C20H23N

4-cyano-4'-n-oxyoctyl-biphenyl

4-cyano-4''-n-pentyl-p-terphenyl C21H25NO

C24H23N

©2014 Waters Corporation 18

Methods

UPC2 conditions CCM back pressure: 1800 psi Sample temp.: 20 oC Column temp.: 60 oC Injection volume: 1 µL Column: ACQUITY UPC2 BEH 2-EP, 3.0 mm x 100 mm, 1.7 µm Mobile phase A: CO2 Mobile phase B: Acetonitrile PDA conditions UV system: ACQUITY UPC2 PDA Detector Range : 190 to 450 nm Resolution: 1.2 nm Sampling rate: 20 pts/sec Filter time constant: Slow (0.2 sec)

©2014 Waters Corporation 19

Liquid Crystal Intermediate Compounds

Chemical Substance CAS

Number Retention time

(minutes) UV optimum

absorbance (nm)

4-cyano-4'-n-puntyl-biphenyl 5CB 40817-08-1 0.889 269

4-cyano-4'-n-heptyl-biphenyl 7CB 41122-71-8 1.012 269

4-cyano-4'-n-oxyoctyl-biphenyl 8OCB 52364-73-5 1.469 287

4-cyano-4''-n-pentyl-p-terphenyl 5CT 54211-46-0 1.742 292

©2014 Waters Corporation 20

Calibration Curve

©2014 Waters Corporation 21

UV Chromatograms and UV Spectra

4-cyano-4'-n-heptyl-biphenyl

4-cyano-4'-n-oxyoctyl-biphenyl

4-cyano-4'-n-puntyl-biphenyl

4-cyano-4''-n-pentyl-p-terphenyl

©2014 Waters Corporation 22

Compositional Analysis

blank

Correct ratio

Incorrect ratio

51%25% 16% 8%

40%25% 23% 12%

Chemical Substance Correct ratio Incorrect ratio

Prepared %

Calculated %

Prepared %

Calculated %

4-cyano-4'-n-puntyl-biphenyl 5CB 51.0 51.3 40.0 40.4

4-cyano-4'-n-heptyl-biphenyl 7CB 25.0 24.9 25.0 24.9

4-cyano-4'-n-oxyoctyl-biphenyl 8OCB 16.0 15.9 23.0 22.7

4-cyano-4''-n-pentyl-p-terphenyl 5CT 8.0 8.0 12.0 12.1

©2014 Waters Corporation 23

Compositional Analysis

Correct ratioIncorrect ratio

©2014 Waters Corporation 24

Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection

MS splitter

From the Column manager or PDA

From the makeup pump

To the convergence Manager

To the MS

Waters ACQUITY UPC2 configured with PDA and MS detection (here illustrated with an SQD), including MS splitter and a makeup pump

©2014 Waters Corporation 25

Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection

Electrospray Ionization (ESI) – An electrically charged field is used to generate charged droplets,

then analyte ions are formed by evaporation prior to MS analysis – The addition of a protonation source such as formic acid to the

makeup solvent can be used to enhance ionization and increase sensitivity

Atmospheric Pressure Photo Ionization (APPI) – Ultraviolet light produced from a krypton lamp ionizes gas phase

analytes and dopants leading to gas-phase reactions – Therefore, the addition of a dopant such as toluene to the makeup

solvent can enable and enhance ionization

Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization (APCI) – The solvent present, from both the co-solvent and the makeup

solvents, acts as chemical ionization reagent gas in order to ionize the sample

©2014 Waters Corporation 26

Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection

MS conditions

Mass Spectrometer Xevo TQD

Ionization mode APCI APPI ESI

Corona 3.0 µA N/A N/A

Capillary N/A N/A 5.00 kV

APCI probe temp. 300 oC 300 oC N/A

Source temp. 150 oC

Repeller N/A 0.50 kV N/A

Desolvation gas 800 oC 600 oC 600 oC

Cone gas 0 L/hr

Acquisition Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM)

MS splitter conditions

Makeup pump Waters 515

Solvent Methanol Methanol + 10% toluene Methanol + 1% formic acid

Flow 0.4 mL/min

©2014 Waters Corporation 27

Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection

Tuning: – 2 ppm standards in methanol – The compounds were tuned in APCI – MRM, transitions, cone and collision energy values optimized using Xevo TQD fluidics

only:

Compound CAS Mol formula Molecular weight

APCI (+/-)

Cone Voltage (V)

MRM Transition

(m/z)

Collision energy

4-(Octyloxy)benzoic acid 2493-84-7 C15H22O3 250.33 + 40 251.2 > 121.0* 20

251.2 > 139.0 20

4,4′-Azoxyanisole-d14 39750-11-3 C14H13DN2O3 272.36 + 30 273.2 > 114.1* 25

273.2 > 142.1 20

4-Butoxybenzoic acid 1498-96-0 C11H14O3 194.23 + 30 195.0 > 95.0* 20

195.0 > 121.0 20

4-Butylbenzoic acid 20651-71-2 C11H14O2 178.23 + 30 179.1 > 123.0 10

179.1 > 161.0* 15

4-Cyanobenzoic acid 619-65-8 C8H5NO2 147.13 - 25 146 > 102.0* 15

4-Octylbenzoic acid 3575-31-3 C15H22O2 234.33 + 35 235.0 > 123.0* 15

235.0 > 217.0 20

*refers to the quantification transition

©2014 Waters Corporation 28

Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

3

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

APCI APPI ESI

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

1

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

3

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

%

0

4-Octylbenzoic acid

4-(Octyloxy)benzoic acid

4-Butoxybenzoic acid

4-Butylbenzoic acid

4-Cyanobenzoic acid

4,4′-Azoxyanisole-d14

©2014 Waters Corporation 29

Conclusion

Separation by UPC2 is an ideal alternative to both HPLC and GC analysis

UPC2 with PDA detection offers a cost effective and efficient impurity profiling and compositional analysis

UPC2 with MS detection: – greater selectivity and specificity – orthogonal technique

Many business and analytical benefits, when compared

HPLC for the analysis of liquid crystal intermediate compounds

©2014 Waters Corporation 31