hybrid routing for the iot

Hybrid Routing for the IoTchallenges & opportunities

Lotte Steenbrink, iNET HAW Hamburg 1

Outline☞ Roadmap

☞ What is Hybrid Routing?

☞ Existing concepts

☞ Suitability for the Internet of Things

☞ Experimental work

☞ Conclusion & Outlook


The big picture

AW1

AW2 PJ1

Overview: routing for the IoT

Specialization: Hybrid routing Experimental protocol evaluation

SEMINAR PJ2

THESIS

Towards a Hybrid routing protocol for the IoT


What is Hybrid Routing?


proactive reactive


Flashback


The time is now


Scope


route area


Architecture


Protocol Framework


Protocol☞ fine-grained optimization

• size• computation• packet overhead [p2prpl]


Protocol☞ fine-grained optimization

• size• computation• packet overhead [p2prpl]

☞ inflexible• protocol updates are hard• re-use of existing codebases is hard


Framework☞ flexible

• mix & match protocols• update protocols• re-use existing codebases




☞ less lightweight• no protocol fine-tuning




☞ less lightweight• no protocol fine-tuning

☞ semi-frameworks: one fixed, one flexible protocol [SHARP]


Suitability forthe IoT


Suitability for the IoT

ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE

protocol framework

SCOPE SCOPE

route-centered area-centered


Experimentalwork


IoT-Lab


Conclusion & Outlook


Thank You


protocol list


References

[HYMAD] J. Whitbeck and V. Conan, “HYMAD: hybrid DTN-MANET routing for dense and highly dynamic wireless networks,” CoRR, vol. abs/1006.3426, 2010.[IZRP] P. Samar, M. R. Pearlman, and Z. J. Haas, “Independent zone routing: An adaptive hybrid routing framework for ad hoc wireless networks,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 12, pp. 595–608, Aug. 2004.[NodeCentric]S. Roy and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “Node- Centric Hybrid Routing for Ad Hoc Networks,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Mobility and Wireless Access, MobiWac ’02, (Washington, DC, USA), pp. 63–, IEEE Com- puter Society, 2002.[p2prpl] E. Baccelli, M. Philipp, and M. Goyal, “The p2p-rpl routing protocol for ipv6 sensor networks: Testbed experiments,” in Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), 2011 19th International Conference on, pp. 1–6, Sept 2011.[SHARP] V. Ramasubramanian, Z. J. Haas, and E. G. Sirer, “SHARP: A Hybrid Adaptive Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,” in Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing, MobiHoc ’03, pp. 303–314, ACM, 2003.


References

[TZRP] L. Wang and S. Olariu, “A Two-Zone Hy- brid Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 15, pp. 1105–1116, Dec. 2004.[WARP] P. Sholander, A. Yankopolus, P. Coccoli, and S. Tabrizi, “Experimental comparison of hybrid and proactive MANET routing protocols,” in MILCOM 2002. Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 513– 518 vol.1, Oct 2002.[ZHLS] M. Joa-Ng and I.-T. Lu, “A peer-to-peer zone-based two-level link state routing for mobile ad hoc networks,” Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, vol. 17, pp. 1415–1425, Aug 1999.[ZRP] Z. Haas, M. Pearlman, and P. Samar, “The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks,” draft, IETF, July 2002.


Image Creditpictograms (all from the Noun Project)

Computer designed by Ji Sub Jeong, Light bulbs designed by Julien Deveaux, Lamps designed by Renee Ramsey-Passmore, Thomas Le Bas and Becca O'Shea, Rubber Duck designed by Simon Child, Rocking Horse designed by Okan Benn, Circus Elephant designed by Solène Troussé, Lego designed by Okan Benn, Lego designed by jon trillana, Game Boy designed by Simon Child, Castle designed by Road Signs.

Photos

IoT-Lab Inria ParisLotte Steenbrink, iNET HAW Hamburg 27

hybrid routing for the iot

Technology

inet haw hamburg

iot lotte steenbrink

scope lotte steenbrink

architecture lotte steenbrink

hard lotte steenbrink

flashback lotte steenbrink

protocol list lotte

iotlab lotte steenbrink