hunter curve

38
Hunter’s Curve in the 21 st Century ACEEE Hot Water Forum Steven Buchberger November 4, 2013

Upload: sandeepan-chowdhury

Post on 06-May-2017

305 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hunter Curve

Hunter’s Curve in the 21st Century

ACEEE Hot Water Forum

Steven Buchberger

November 4, 2013

Page 2: Hunter Curve

What is Hunter’s Curve?

2

Page 3: Hunter Curve

Hunter’s Curve Predicts Peak Flow

Fixture Units

GPM

3

Page 4: Hunter Curve

4

Page 5: Hunter Curve

Life in 1940

Population = 2.3B Gas = $0.2/gal5

Page 6: Hunter Curve

Life in 2013

Population = 7.0B Gas = $4/gal6

Page 7: Hunter Curve

Hour

Flo

w (

L/m

in) Friday, May 16

0 4 8 12 16 20 24

0

20

40

60

80

100

End User Demand (21 units)

7

Page 8: Hunter Curve

t

T

q

One Fixture is a Bernoulli Trial

p = t/T = Average duration of flow

Avg time btn consecutive uses8

Page 9: Hunter Curve

t

T

q

Three Key Parameters…..

Fixture Characteristics

Human Behaviorp = t/T

9

Page 10: Hunter Curve

Many Fixtures Exist

1 2 3 n• • • k • • •

1

2

3

10

Page 11: Hunter Curve

Many Fixtures Exist

1 2 3 n• • • k • • •

1

2

3

11Overlapping pulses

Page 12: Hunter Curve

Design Problem

“Assuming that there are n (identical ) fixtures in a system, each operated once in Tseconds on the average, and that each operation is of t seconds average duration, what is the probability that k fixtures will be found operating simultaneously at any arbitrarily chosen instant of observation”?

(Roy Hunter, 1940)

12

Page 13: Hunter Curve

Many Fixtures are Binomial

1 2 3 n• • • k • • •

Pr 1

0,1,...,

k n kexactly k busy fixtures np p

out of n total fixtures k

twhere p k n

T

13

Page 14: Hunter Curve

Binomial Distribution Example

p=0.20; n=7

Binomial Distribution for Flush Tanks

Number of Busy Fixtures

pro

bability

0 2 4 6 8

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

77

Pr 0.2 0.8 0,1,...,7k kexactly k

kbusy fixtures k

14

Page 15: Hunter Curve

p=0.20; n=7

Binomial Distribution for Flush Tanks

Number of Busy Fixtures

pro

bability

0 2 4 6 8

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Design Condition is 99th Percentile

1% chance

15

99% chance

Page 16: Hunter Curve

Design Flow, One Fixture Group

n

Fixture Group A

0 10 20 30 40

0

10

20

30

40

Q(0.99)

p=t/T=0.2

(gpm)n=7; Q=16 gpm

0.99

47 4 16

gpmQ n m q fixtures gpm

fixture

16

Page 17: Hunter Curve

Design Flows, Two Fixture Groups

n

Fixture Group A

Fixture Group B

Q(0.99)

0 10 20 30 40

0

10

20

30

40

p=t/T=0.20

p=t/T=0.05(gpm)

17

Page 18: Hunter Curve

Common Currency One Curve

Fixture Units

GPM

18

Page 19: Hunter Curve

Hunter’s curve has withstood the test of time and is the basis for plumbing codes around the globe today.

Hunter’s curve went viral long before U-tube arrived; not surprising, it is clever, convenient, correct.

However, today Hunter’s curve is often faulted for giving overly conservative design….why?

Hunter’s Track Record

19

Page 20: Hunter Curve

[1] Simplicity is seductive. Hunter’s curve has been applied to many situations for which it was not intended.

[2] Times have changed. Water use fixtures (hot and cold) have become much more efficient since Hunter’s pioneering work.

Two Main Issues

20

Page 21: Hunter Curve

Hunter’s Curve in 1940

Fixture Units

GPM

21

Page 22: Hunter Curve

Hunter’s Curve in 2013

GPMLEED, NZE, HE fixtures = lower q

uncongested use = lower n, p

22

Page 23: Hunter Curve

National effort in US to update Hunter’s curve for peak water demands.

Driven by professional societies, not the US Gov’t (not Nat’l Bureau Standards).

Prevailing sentiment is to simply revise the fixture units in the code.

What would Roy Hunter do?

Old Habits Die Hard

23

Page 24: Hunter Curve

IAPMO Sub-Task Group Orders

“….work singularly to develop the probability model to predict peak residential demands based on the number of plumbing fixtures of different kinds installed in one system.”

24

Page 25: Hunter Curve

Aquacraft Data Sets

• 2011 California Single Family Home Water Use Efficiency Study (n=750)

• 2011 Albuquerque Retrofit Study

o Pre-retrofit (n=240)

o Post-retrofit (n=29)

• 2010 EPA Standard New Homes (n=302)

• 2010 EPA High Efficiency New Homes (n=25)

[1,346 homes ….. >15,000 home days]

25

Page 26: Hunter Curve

Data Base Queries

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

home unique ID

range of home IDs

Aquacraft data set(s)

age of home

retrofit status of home (Y/N)

geographic location of home

fixture performance (NLF, LF, ULF )

fixture group

26

Page 27: Hunter Curve

Data Base Queries

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

home unique ID

range of home IDs

Aquacraft data set(s)

age of home

retrofit status of home (Y/N)

geographic location of home

fixture performance (NLF, LF, ULF )

fixture group

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

indoor water use

outdoor water use

weekday water use

weekend water use

AM or PM use

hot or cold water use *

per capita daily water use

total annual household water use

27

Page 28: Hunter Curve

Data Base Queries

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

home unique ID

range of home IDs

Aquacraft data set(s)

age of home

retrofit status of home (Y/N)

geographic location of home

fixture performance (NLF, LF, ULF )

fixture group

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

indoor water use

outdoor water use

weekday water use

weekend water use

AM or PM use

hot or cold water use

per capita daily water use

total annual household water use

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

home square footage

yard square footage

number of bedrooms

number of bathrooms

number of occupants

age of occupants

water meter size

? _____________

28

Page 29: Hunter Curve

29

Six Types of Residential Fixtures

[1] Toilets (3 efficiency levels)

[2] Showers

[3] Bathtubs

[4] Faucets (all sinks)

[5] Dishwasher (energy star ratings)

[6] Clothes Washer (energy star ratings)

Page 30: Hunter Curve

30

Three Characteristics of Fixtures

[1] Pulse Intensity (q)

[2] Pulse Duration (t)

[3] Pulse Frequency (T)

t

q

T

Page 31: Hunter Curve

Water Pulse Characteristics

Fixture Group

No of Fixtures

Typical MinimumWater Pulse

Average (Nominal) Water Pulse

Typical MaximumWater Pulse

Standard Deviation Water Pulse

Sample Size

Terms and Units Water Pulse

n q t v=qt q t v=qt q t v=qt q t v N q t v

FG 1 100 1.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.50 5.00 0.25 0.25 1.00 774

FG 2 100 1.50 3.50 5.25 3.00 8.00 24.00 3.50 10.00 35.00 0.50 1.50 6.00 191 gpm min gal

FG 4 50 1.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1040.3

Average (Nominal) Water Pulse

q t v=qt1.50 2.00 3.003.00 8.00 24.001.00 0.50 0.50

(gpm) (min) (gal)

Fixture Group

FG 1FG 2FG 4

(example, N=50 homes)

31

Page 32: Hunter Curve

Peak Flow (99th percentile)

Fixture Group

FG 1, n=100FG 2, n=100FG 4, n=50

7 am 8 am0.026 0.0410.103 0.051

0.028 0.019

Probability of Fixture Use

p=t/T

(example, N=50 homes)

Hour ending 7 amFixtures Flow (gpm)

mean var mean var2.6 2.5 3.9 5.7

10.3 9.2 30.9 83.21.4 1.4 1.4 1.4

14.3 13.1 36.2 90.3

58.3 gpmQ(0.99)=

per Wistort 199432

Page 33: Hunter Curve

Normal approximation (Wistort, 1994)

Computer simulation: SIMDEUM or PRPsym

Full enumeration of CDF (WDSA 2012)

Merge w/ Bldg Information Modeling (BIM)

“There’s an app for that!”

Tantalizing Possibilities

+ =+ +33

Page 34: Hunter Curve

[email protected]

University of Cincinnati

Questions?

34

Page 35: Hunter Curve

Phones to Faucets Analogy

“Arrival Rates”

Poisson Model Erlang 1918

“Time Between Uses”

Binomial Model Hunter 1940

35

Page 36: Hunter Curve

Shutterstock.com

End User Examples - 1

Schools

Hospitals

36

Page 37: Hunter Curve

Shutterstock.com

End User Examples - 2

Opera Houses

Bus/Rail Stations

37

Page 38: Hunter Curve

Shutterstock.com

End User Examples – 3…

Hotels, CBD

Sports Stadiums

38