hungry water: managing sediment in rivers

43
Presentation to the MRC Sediment Workshop October 2008 Matt Kondolf, University of California Berkeley Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Upload: others

Post on 23-Oct-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Presentation to the MRC Sediment Workshop October 2008Matt Kondolf, University of California Berkeley

Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Page 2: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

What is Hungry Water?Hungry water is river flowwith excess transport capacity

It has more stream power to transport than available sediment.

As a result, it tends to erode its bed and banks to compensate.

When the longitudinal continuity of sediment transportis interrupted (e.g., from dams), hungry water results.

Page 3: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Longitudinal Continuity of Sediment Transport

Transport Zone:Bars may reappear yearafter year - form is stablebut the gravel particles may be replaced annually

Page 4: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

The transport zone like a conveyor belt: on geological time scale the sediment is in motion, with only temporary storage in bars, floodplains, etc..

Page 5: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Dams interrupt the natural continuity of sediment transport in rivers, resulting in reservoir sedimentation and reduced sediment supply downstream. (trap 100% bedload)

The Carmel River above San Clemente Dam (now full of sediment)

Page 6: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

If not managed, reservoirs can fill completelywith sediment, creating dangerous and expensive problems for the future (near or far)

San Clemente Reservoir, Carmel River: $83 million to stabilize

Carmel RiverSanClemente Ck

-- dam

Page 7: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

05,000

10,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,00045,00050,000

1850

1860

1870

1880

1890

1900

1910

1920

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

year

Cum

ulat

ive

rese

rvoi

r sto

rage

ca

paci

ty (M

illio

n m

3)

0102030405060708090100

Num

ber o

f dam

s bu

ilt p

er

year

Cumulative reservoir storage capacityNumber of dams built per year

How serious a problem in the future?In California, most dams already built, but many newdams planned for Mekong region.

Cumulative reservoir capacity, California

Page 8: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Downstream of dams: Hungry WaterDams release sediment-starved water with excess energyResult: erosion of bed and banks- channel incision, often down to bedrock

Bed coarsens as smaller,easily transported grainsare washed downstream

Page 9: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Colorado Riverdownstream of Glen Canyon Dam:

hungry water has eroded beaches neededfor camping and wildlife

Page 10: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Stony Creekdownstream of

Black Butte Dam(built 1963)

Channel incised 2 m,converted from braided

to meandering pattern

Page 11: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

How to manage/mitigate for reservoir sedimentationand for hungry water downstream?Sediment pass-through:Pass sediment through the dam during floods,Need large, low-level outletsNot practical for large reservoirs with year-to-year storage

Gravel/sediment augmentationMechanically add sediment to channel downstreamMost examples for fish habitatRhine River - to protect infrastructure downstream

Mine reservoir deposits for aggregateMiddle American River, Calif, sediment added downstreamShikma Reservoir, Israel - maintain capacity by extraction

Page 12: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Sediment Pass-ThroughSediment transported through outlets of dam

Example: Jensanpei Reservoir (Taiwan Sugar Co)Sluice gates (low-level outlets) left open for the first part of the rainy season to allow accumulated sediment to flush out. Reservoir stores water again half-way through the rainy season.Carry-over storage not needed (power needed only to process sugar).

Page 13: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

After sluicing started, sedimentation of the reservoir stabilized. As Taiwan Sugar changed from sugar to development, a resort was developed around the reservoir, by 1999, annual drawdown was no longer acceptable. By 2008, the managers had resumed drawdownto sustain reservoir capacity.

JenSen Pei Reservoir sedimentation over time

Page 14: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Shikma Reservoir, Israel had filled, lost capacity.Upstream dredged, sand & gravel used for aggregate.Downstream dredged, clay used for bricks & pottery.Middle portion left vegetated, to filter silts.

Maintaining reservoir capacity by mechanical removal

Page 15: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Gravel Augmentation Below DamsArtificially adding gravel below dams to compensatefor sediment starvation

Goals: - salmonid habitat enhancement, - protect infrastructure from incision,- restore coarse sediment load

Two approaches:1.Build artificial riffles(restore form)

2.inject gravel forredistribution by flows(restore process)

Page 16: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Formerly, the Sacramento Riverwas a highly connected system,with exchanges of water, sediment,nutrients, and organisms

Page 17: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Now:Longitudinal and lateralconnectivity reduced,

Flow dynamics reduced

Page 18: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers
Page 19: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Consider Catchment ContextReduced sediment supply – “Hungry Water”Dams cut off all bedload, some suspGravel mining – gravel sinksBank protection Channelization/dredging legacy effectsAccount for tributary inputs

Changed sediment transport capacityDecreased xport capacity below damsSediment transport capacity changes with additionof sediment due to changed supply, grain size

Counteracting: narrower channel, higher shear?

Many uncertainties, so must manage adaptively

Page 20: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Over 500,000 m3gravel added torivers below damsin northern California,all to improve salmonspawning habitat

Page 21: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000

Sacramento RiverClear Creek

Middle Fork American RiverTrinity River

Tuolumne RiverStanislaus River

Mokelumne RiverAmerican River

Feather RiverMerced River

Payne's CreekMill Creek

Battle CreekDry Creek

Middle CreekPutah Creek

Hamilton BranchHelms Creek

Big Chico CreekHat Creek

Granite Creek

Volume of Gravel Added (m3)

Page 22: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Fi

Artificial riffles designed to create spawning habitatby creating the forms

Page 23: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Gravel injection below Keswick Dam

Page 24: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

5 DAMS

1931 - 1968

Gravel Augmentationon the Ain River, France

On a reach sediment-starvedfrom upstream dams

Piegay, Rollet, LejotCNRS Lyon

Page 25: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Gravel extracted from a former channel was addedto the sediment-starvedmain channel

Page 26: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Gravel excavated fromsecondary channel placed in main channelof Ain River

Page 27: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

0 50 meters

Before 2 months after 6 months after

While substantial, the amount of gravel added tothe river was less than 2 years deficitThe added gravel was quickly mobilized downstream

Page 28: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Juillet 2005 Juin 2006

J. Lejot, PhD, 2008

Detailed bathymetric analysis shows erosion of added gravel

Page 29: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

The French-German Rhine

Series of hydroelectric damsbuilt progressing downstream

Below Iffezheim, adding gravelto compensate sediment deficit

The largest gravel augmentation project is not for habitatbut infrastructure on

Page 30: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers
Page 31: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers
Page 32: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers
Page 33: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers
Page 34: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers
Page 35: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers
Page 36: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers
Page 37: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers
Page 38: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Gravel and sand mining from river channelsA large but often under-appreciated problem

Page 39: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Virtually all sand and gravel mined in California and many regions comes from alluvial deposits

Page 40: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Gravel extraction from channels is easier in rivers withhighly variable flow regimes. In Mediterranean California, can operate heavy equipment in channel in summer.

Page 41: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Effect of instreamgravel mining:Incision upstream due to headcutting,and downstream dueto sediment starvation

Page 42: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Cache Creek 1992

Page 43: Hungry Water: Managing Sediment in Rivers

Kaoping River Bridge, Taiwan. Failed from mining-induced incision

Tujunga Wash, Los Angeles

washing out the Foothill

Blvd bridge in 1969