humic science & technology viii march 16-18, 2005 northeastern university boston, ma, usa...

19
Humic Science & Technology VIII March 16-18, 2005 Northeastern University Boston, MA, USA martina klučáková martina klučáková pavla žbánková pavla žbánková miloslav pekař miloslav pekař Brno University of Technology Faculty of Chemistry Institute of Physical and Applied Chemistry

Upload: hector-evans

Post on 17-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Humic Science & Technology VIII

March 16-18, 2005Northeastern University

Boston, MA, USA

martina klučákovámartina klučáková pavla žbánkovápavla žbánkovámiloslav pekařmiloslav pekař

Brno University of TechnologyFaculty of Chemistry

Institute of Physical and Applied Chemistry

2

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

interaction of metal ions with humic acids

toxicity of natural systems

carry on previous study (Cu2+)

etc.

3

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

lignite mine

4

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

lignitic humic acid

raw material: South-Moravian lignite

isolation: alkalic extraction (NaOH)

C [at. %]

H[at. %]

N[at. %]

S[at. %]

O[at. %]

COOH

[mmol/g]

total acidity[mmol/g]

40.3

41.0

1.5 0.4 16.8

3.27 4.04normalized on dry ash-free

HA

5

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

humic sols

humic gelsCo2+

Ni2+

physical & chemical interactions

0.01 - 0.20 M

0.1-1.0 g/L

17 % HA

6

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

previous results:

0.2 M (Cu2+)

1 g/dm3 (HA)

I = 0.1 M (sol)Cu2+ + HR CuR+

+ H+

2CuR+ CuR2 + Cu2+

7

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

0.2 M (Co2+)

1 g/dm3 (HA); I = 0.1 M (sol)

0.2 M (Ni2+)

8

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

conductivity and pH

increases stop in the

same moment

conductivity increases while pH-value is constant

[H+]

1×10-6 mol/L

8×10-7 mol/L

[H+]

3×10-5 mol/L

pH increasing is slower than in the case of

Co2+ & Ni2+

Cu2+

9

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

MeCl2 Me2+ + 2Cl-

HR + H2O H3O+ + R-

2H2O H3O+ + OH-

Me2+ + 4H2O Me(OH)2 + 2H3O+

Me2+ + HR + H2O MeR+ + H3O+Me2+ + R- MeR+

2MeR+ MeR2 + Me2+MeR+ + HR + H2O MeR2 +

H3O+MeR+ + R- MeR2

10

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

Ni2+ (0.01M)

0.01M Me2+– conductivity decreases (sol 0.1 – 1 g/L); I = 0.1 M

sol (0.1 g/L)

sol (1 g/L)

11

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

Ni2+ (0.01 M)

I = 0.5 M (sol 0.1 – 1 g/L) no minimum on pH-curve

sol (1 g/L)Ni2+ (0.20

M)

12

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

Co2+ (0.01 M)

gel no minimum on pH-curve conductivity only increases (Me2+: 0.01 –

0.20 M)

gel

Co2+ (0.20 M)

13

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

summary reaction: H2R + Me2+ MeR +

2H+

2nd order kinetic rate equation:

dx / dt = k (a-x) (b-x)

kt = 1 / (b-a) ln [a(b-x) / (b(a-x))]

t = 0 a b 0 ht > 0 a – x b – x x h + 2xt ∞ 0 b – a a h + 2a

14

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

apparent rate constants: sols (0.1 g/L; I = 0.1 M)

apparent rate constants: gels

c0 [mol/L]

Ni2+ Co2+ Cu2+

0.08 1.46 10-5

7.89 10-5

2.02 10-5

0.10 4.39 10-6

6.38 10-5

1.05 10-5

0.15 1.13 10-6

2.25 10-6

2.66 10-6

0.20 2.98 10-7

8.88 10-7

5.21 10-7

c0 [mol/L]

Ni2+ Co2+ Cu2+

0.08 1.12 10-4

1.78 10-4

1.67 10-4

0.10 7.41 10-5

1.64 10-4

1.56 10-4

0.15 5.23 10-5

9.29 10-5

9.13 10-5

0.20 3.69 10-5

7.92 10-5

4.48 10-5

[m3/mol.s]

[m3/mol.s]

b >> a

15

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

diffusion from constant source

t = 0

x 0; L c1 = 0

t 0

x = 0 c1 = c1,s = const.

t 0

x = L / 2

c1 / x = 0

one-dimensional diffusion T, p = const.; D D (c)

211

x

cD

t

c

Dt

cm s,12

example: Ni2+

16

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

diffusion from constant source (24 h)

Def [m2/s] Dtab [m2/s]

Ni2+ 8.18 10-

10

1.32 10-

9

Co2+ 7.98 10-

10

1.46 10-

9

Cu2+ 1.07 10-

9

1.43 10-

9 21

21

1 x

cD

t

c

1

D

Def1,1 cc im

17

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

diffusion from time-variable source example:

Co2+24 h

0.20 M

18

Humic Science & Technology VIII, March 16-18, 2005, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

complex interaction mechanism HA - metal ions

non-ideal kinetics

diffusion-affected interaction with humic gel

…….

19

thanks