human resources management
DESCRIPTION
Human Resources Management. HRM Questions To Consider. Why is HRM not just “personnel” anymore? Should you “promote from within” or look for “new blood?” What tools will best help you select a job candidate? What are the keys to running a good interview? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Human Resources Management
![Page 2: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
HRM Questions To Consider
Why is HRM not just “personnel” anymore? Should you “promote from within” or look for
“new blood?” What tools will best help you select a job
candidate? What are the keys to running a good interview? Should you measure employee performance
using objective or subjective measures? How do you give feedback effectively?
![Page 3: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Human resource management and competitive advantage
Big trend in the past two decades to link human resource practices, strategy and performance
“Strategic” HRM: managing the HRM system to support the organization’s strategy and goals
– Work closely with the “line” organization to improve efficiency, quality, innovation, and responsiveness.
– Support high performance work practices E.g., Cross-functional and self-managed work teams, TQM,
employee involvement, training, information sharing– Contrast with HRM as “personnel” – administering policies
![Page 4: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
HRM Systems and Market Value
$250,000
$270,000
$290,000
$310,000
$330,000
$350,000
$370,000
$390,000
$410,000
Market Market ValueValue
in in Dollars Dollars
per per EmployeeEmployee
Quality of the HRM SystemQuality of the HRM System
TopQuintile
LowestQuintile
MiddleQuintile
Firms with excellent HRM Systems have greater market value per employee
![Page 5: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The HRM Process
Compensationand
Benefits
CareerDevelopment
PerformanceManagement
HumanResourcePlanning
Recruitment
Derecruitment
SelectionIdentification and selection
of competent employees
Orientation TrainingAdapted and competent
employees with up-to-dateskills and knowledge
Competent employees whoare capable of sustaining high
performance over the long term
Environment
Environment
![Page 6: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Recruitment: A dizzying variety of methods
![Page 7: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Internal vs. External RecruitmentPros & Cons
External Recruiting – seeking outside the firm– Pro: Brings in new skills and ideas– Con: Outsider’s actual capabilities and fit (e.g., with
organizational culture) are relatively unknown Internal Recruiting – moving people in the firm
– Pro: Job candidates and qualifications are relatively better known
– Pro: “Promotion from within” motivates employees– Con: Often costly if job skills must be learned on the job
A balance is typically most effective
![Page 8: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Selection: The prediction exercise
Selection: Assessing applicant’s qualifications in order to hire the most appropriate candidates
Tools for selection: – Resumes– Interviews– Tests and Simulations
Key issue:– Validity of tools varies
![Page 9: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Each selection tool has strengths and weaknesses
Standard Tools:– Resumes and application forms – initial screening– Interviews – almost universal, reasonably valid– Written tests - measure intelligence, ability, personality,
interest, etc. – popular; validity varies– Reference checks – tough to get negative information
Performance-simulation tests– Work sampling - perform key tasks (non-managerial jobs)– Assessment center - simulate challenges of managerial jobs– Most valid – Most expensive
![Page 10: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Suggestions For Interviewing
Structure the interview to maximize validity of information:
– Structured (job-related questions) interviews in preference to unstructured (conversational) interviews
– Use multiple interviews rather than just a single one– Get detailed answers about actual job behaviors rather than
generalities about job responsibilities– Take notes during the interview – things blend together!– Avoid over-talking; practice active listening– Watch cognitive biases (stereotyping; same-as-me; halo)– Ask appropriate questions
![Page 11: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Training and Development
Training (individual performers and managers): Helping employees be effective performers in their current jobs:
– Example: Learn technical, interpersonal, problem-solving skills.
Development (usually managers or professionals): Enabling employees to take on new challenges:
– Example: Varied job experience is key developmentally
![Page 12: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Employee Performance Management
Performance appraisals are often done poorly– They are put off because of “today’s crisis”– Managers often don’t deliver negative feedback well
High-performing organizations put enormous attention on “fixing” these problems with performance management – Through systems and through training
![Page 13: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Doing performance appraisal well
What basis to evaluate performance on?– Subjectively (manager’s perceptions)
Rich information Potential for favoritism of certain employees Potential for inconsistency across managers Potential for biased perceptions (think cognitive biases)
– Objectively (measurable results) (Apparently) less bias Information not as rich
– Recommendation: Incorporate both types of evaluation
![Page 14: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Doing performance appraisal well
To use subjective evaluation effectively:– Evaluate behaviors rather than traits– Describe specific, important job-related behaviors
rather than making overall judgments or citing outlying incidents.
To use objective evaluation effectively: – Work with employees to set goals– Consider degree to which employee efforts controls
goal achievement
![Page 15: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Example of subject evaluation:Graphic Rating Scale
Evaluates poorly by the subjective evaluation criteria
![Page 16: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Better subjective evaluation:Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale
![Page 17: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Additional evaluation techniques: Forced Rankings
The Problem: Every employee gets rated as high-performing, so it is not possible to differentiate between employees.
Potential Solution: Forced ranking– Each manager is required to categorize employees using a pre-set, fixed
scheme Example: Managers must rate 10% as excellent; 20% as exceeds requirements; 50%
meets requirements; 20% below requirements Sometimes coupled with additional rules (two consecutive below requirement ratings =
dismissal required). Pros:
– Better differentiation of high and low performers – Deters retention of low performers
Cons: – Assumes each department has equal # of high / low performers– Employees feel they are in competition with each other– Labels often leave good employees uncomfortable (“I’m average?”)
![Page 18: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Delivering Feedback Effectively
The recommended imagery is joint problem-solving rather than chewing someone out.
– What: Be specific and focus on correctable behavior. – How: Focus on problem-solving / improvement, not criticism.– When: Set a timetable for agreed changes.– Treat subordinates with respect.– Express confidence in worker’s ability to improve.– Use both formal and informal feedback opportunities.
Obviously, chewing someone out has its uses, at times.
![Page 19: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Compensation And Benefits
Compensation trends are following the move towards flat, flexible, responsive organizations:
– Reduce number of pay levels – “bands” not levels– Skill-based pay– Pay for performance
Benefits– Legally required: social security, workers’ compensation– Voluntary: health insurance, retirement, day care– Cafeteria-style benefits plans
![Page 20: Human Resources Management](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813527550346895d9c8feb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Pay for performance
Traditional model:– Salary with (permanent) increases based on individual performance
Pay-for-performance: Variable compensation based on individual, group and/or organization performance.
– For example, commissions; bonuses; employee stock options Benefits of pay-for-performance:
– Increased motivational leverage Large changes (tied to current performance) rather than small Encourage focus on team or organizational goals
– Flexible Allows costs to naturally vary with firm success Reduced need for downsizing or salary “cuts”.