document

12
Pacific Environment April 2010 1 www.pacificenvironment.org Health Impacts of Proposed Power Plants in Eastern Contra Costa County In September 2009, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) filed an application with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) for two new large natural gas power plants. These plants are to be sited near Antioch (called Marsh Landing) and in Oakley, both in Contra Costa County. In addition, PG&E requested that two outdated power plants 1 , scheduled to be shut down due to their use of harmful once through cooling (OTC) systems, remain open for eighteen months longer. Even if the best available technologies are used, the pollutants from these new large power plants are likely to worsen air quality‐related health problems for Contra Costa County communities. Natural gas power plants are known to emit all six “criteria pollutants” listed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), as well as many other toxic chemicals. Contra Costa County is already known for its high levels of toxic emissions, and adding more polluting industries will only increase current public health risks. PG&E’s proposed power plants are not only costly and polluting, but they are also unnecessary. PG&E already has the potential to generate over 30% more power than it supplies in a typical year, even during peak times, and projections show that this will continue to be the case even when the two existing OTC plants 2 are taken offline. Therefore, adding two new large power plants (totaling over 1,300 megawatts) is simply unnecessary. Additionally, although PG&E has promised jobs related to the construction and operation of the two proposed plants, those jobs would largely be temporary. The unemployment crisis has reached a critical point in Contra Costa County, but California is currently undergoing a “green” boom, with “green collar” jobs increasing in many Bay Area counties. Local officials should work to attract sustainable companies that will create long term jobs, such as those found in the “clean‐tech” sector—renewable energy, energy efficiency, and other related industries. This is the key to creating sustainable jobs for our local communities without adversely affecting human health. Executive Summary Photo: LA Times Natural gas power plants are known to emit all six EPA “criteria pollutants” PG&E already has the potential to generate over 30% more power than it supplies in a typical year, even during peak times

Upload: shannon-kellman

Post on 28-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

http://www.pacificenvironment.org/downloads/PacificEnvironment_PowerPlantHealthReport.pdf

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

1

www.pacificenvironment.org

Health Impacts of Proposed Power Plants in Eastern Contra Costa County

In September 2009, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E)  filed  an  application  with  the  California Public  Utilities  Commission  (CPUC)  for  two  new large natural gas power plants. These plants are to be  sited near Antioch  (called Marsh  Landing)  and in  Oakley,  both  in  Contra  Costa  County.  In addition,  PG&E  requested  that  two  outdated power plants1, scheduled to be shut down due to their  use  of  harmful  once  through  cooling  (OTC) 

systems, remain open for eighteen months longer.  Even  if  the  best  available  technologies  are  used, the pollutants from these new large power plants are  likely  to  worsen  air  quality‐related  health problems  for  Contra  Costa  County  communities. Natural gas power plants are known to emit all six “criteria  pollutants”  listed  by  the  United  States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), as well as  many  other  toxic  chemicals.  Contra  Costa County is already known for its high levels of toxic emissions,  and  adding  more  polluting  industries will only increase current public health risks.  

PG&E’s proposed power plants are not only costly and polluting, but they are also unnecessary. PG&E already  has  the  potential  to  generate  over  30% more power than it supplies in a typical year, even during peak times, and projections show that this will  continue  to  be  the  case  even  when  the  two existing  OTC  plants2  are  taken  offline.  Therefore, 

adding  two  new  large  power  plants  (totaling  over 1,300 megawatts) is simply unnecessary.  

Additionally,  although  PG&E  has  promised  jobs related to the construction and operation of the two proposed  plants,  those  jobs  would  largely  be temporary.  The  unemployment  crisis  has  reached  a critical point in Contra Costa County, but California is currently  undergoing  a  “green”  boom,  with  “green collar”  jobs  increasing  in  many  Bay  Area  counties. 

Local  officials  should  work  to  attract  sustainable companies  that  will  create  long  term  jobs,  such  as those  found  in  the  “clean‐tech”  sector—renewable energy,  energy  efficiency,  and  other  related industries. This is the key to creating sustainable jobs for our local communities without adversely affecting human health. 

Executive Summary

Photo: LA Times

Natural gas power plants are known to emit all six EPA

“criteria pollutants” 

PG&E already has the potential to generate over 30% more power

than it supplies in a typical year, even during peak times

Page 2: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

2

www.pacificenvironment.org

Air Pollution in Contra Costa County: Cumulative Effects

Contra  Costa  County  already  suffers  the  highest levels  of  toxic  emissions  of  any  Bay  Area  county, and  ranks  second only  to Los Angeles  in  the state. PG&E’s  proposed  projects  will  increase  toxic emissions  in  Contra  Costa  County,  potentially leading  to  increased  health  problems  for  county residents.  Emissions  from vehicles, major  industry, and other activities are already creating unhealthful air  in Contra Costa County that  frequently exceeds the  set  standards  for  “acceptable”  air  quality.3 Therefore, when considering  the effects of PG&E’s proposed plants,  it  is  important  to  remember  that the pollution emitted by these new projects, as well as  their  related  health  effects,  will  be  in  addition (cumulative)  to  the  emissions  from  the  polluting industries already in operation.  

These new power plants are not only unnecessary, but  they are proposed  to be built  in  a  county  that already  bears more  than  its  fair  share  of  polluting industries. Natural gas power plants in the nine Bay Area counties have the capacity to generate a total of  over  10,000  Megawatts  (MW)  of  electricity, however Contra Costa on its own accounts for over half  of  that  total.4  According  to  information submitted  to  the  California  Energy  Commission (CEC),  the  two  proposed  new  plants would  emit  a combined 170.81 tons per year of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and 75.1  tons per year of particulate matter (PM).  These  are  toxic,  polluting  substances,  which would  further  impact  the  health  of  local communities.  

 

Current facts

• Contra Costa County already hosts more than a dozen power plants, five oil refineries, several chemical plants, and many other industrial facilities.

• Within an approximate six-mile radius of the proposed Marsh Landing facility near Antioch, in 2002 there were at least ten facilities on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) list of major polluting facilities.5

• The most recent Toxic Release Inventory data shows that in 2007 the Bay Area’s top four toxic emitters were in Contra Costa County.6

• The location of the proposed plants is already in the top tenth percentile in the nation for emissions of US EPA “criteria pollutants” (see pollutant chart below).7

• According to California Air Resources Board (CARB) data, Contra Costa County has five times the number of facilities that emit “criteria” air pollutants per square mile than the California average.8

• According to air samples collected in Concord, frequent violations of the Bay Area’s ozone and particulate matter standards are already occurring in the region.9

• The natural geography of the region does not allow for effective pollution dispersal. This results in elevated levels of pollutants on hot summer days or very cold winter nights.10

Page 3: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

3

www.pacificenvironment.org

Asthma  is  a  respiratory  disease  that  constricts  the lungs  and  causes  extreme  breathing  difficulties.  In most cases, prescription inhalers are necessary to help clear  the  airways  in  the  event  of  an  asthma  attack. Lack  of  medical  intervention  for  asthma  attacks  can lead  to  hospitalization,  emergency  room  visits,  and even death. 

Respiratory diseases, such as asthma, can be triggered by, and may even be caused by, exposure  to ground‐level ozone  (smog),  and particulate matter.  Emissions from the proposed projects will increase local levels of particulate  matter  and  volatile  organic  compounds (VOCs ‐ smog causing chemicals), which may lead to an increase in childhood asthma in those communities.  

Health Impacts Linked to Power Plant Emissions

According  to  Contra  Costa  Health  Services, asthma  is  the  number  one  cause  of  school absenteeism  for  children  in  the  country,  which leads  to missed  workdays  and  financial  loss  for parents.13 

The  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency  (EPA)  has  found  that  air  pollutants  emitted  from  industrial sources, such as power plants, increase the likelihood of adverse cardiovascular and respiratory impacts, as well as cause and worsen chronic health conditions,  such as asthma.11  (A detailed description of  the chemicals and their potential health effects can be found on pages 6‐8). These pollutants have also been linked to more serious health effects, such as cancer, permanent respiratory damage, and birth defects. These  health  impacts  are  made  worse  by  the  fact  that  43%  of  low‐income  residents  in  Contra  Costa County do not have health insurance.12 

ASTHMA

Some facts about asthma:

• Asthma is a potentially fatal, chronic disease responsible for over 1.8 million emergency room visits per year, over 460,000 hospitalizations and over 5,000 deaths per year.14

• Asthma in children is the cause of almost five million physician visits and more than 200,000 hospitalizations per year.15

• Childhood asthma rates for children ages 5-17 in Contra Costa County is 23.7%, while the national average is 14.2%.16

• As of 2005, for a child without asthma, the cost of medical expenses averages $618 per year; the annual cost of medical expenses for a child with asthma averages $1,047.17

Photo: Family Education

Page 4: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

4

www.pacificenvironment.org

Donec interdum

Pellentesque:

RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS

CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (COPD)

Like  asthma,  chronic  obstructive  pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common respiratory disease aggravated by high levels of smog pollution and poor  air  quality.  COPD encompasses  a  group of respiratory  diseases  that  includes  chronic obstructive  bronchitis  and  emphysema.  People suffering from COPD typically experience varying levels  of  airflow  obstruction  and  breathing difficulties. 

Exposure  to  smog  can not  only  aggravate  exi‐sting  conditions  (such as  asthma),  but  it  also may  increase  suscept‐ibility  to  respiratory illnesses,  such  as  pneu‐monia  and  bronchitis. 

Numerous  scientific  stu‐dies  have  linked  ground  level ozone to a variety of serious respiratory and pulmonary problems, including: 

• Airway  irritation,  coughing,  and pain when  taking  a deep breath; 

• Wheezing  and  breathing  difficulties  during  exercise or outdoor activities; and 

• Inflammation  of  the  lungs,  which  is  much  like  a sunburn on the skin.22 

Repeated exposure to certain pollutants, such as ozone, can cause permanent lung damage in some cases. 

Although  there  are  many  factors  that contribute  to  cancer  (genetics,  diet, lifestyle,  environment,  etc),  certain carcinogenic  pollutants  are  known  to contribute  to,  and  perhaps  even  cause certain  types  of  cancers.  Several  of  the compounds  emitted  by  power  plants  are known carcinogens, or have been linked to increased cancer  levels  in certain areas.  It should be mentioned that much of the air pollution‐related  cancer  risk  in  Contra Costa  County  is  from  diesel  and  other sources of mobile emissions. However, the proposed  power  plants  will  contribute additional  cancer‐causing  chemicals  to  an area  already  high  in  carcinogenic emissions.  

CANCER

According to the US EPA18:

• COPD is the fourth leading cause of death in the U.S., the leading cause of hospitalization in adults, particularly in older adults, and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and disability.19

• Air pollution may be an important contributor to COPD.20

Lung cancer has been linked to breathing polluted air, in addition to other factors. In fact, it has been shown that air pollution, mainly from vehicles, industries, and power plants, raises the chances of lung cancer and heart disease in people exposed to it long term.21

Photo: Living Well, Northern Nevada Medical Center 

Page 5: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

5

www.pacificenvironment.org

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (HEART DISEASE)

Like  cancer,  cardiovascular  disease  is caused by many  factors, most  of which are  influenced  by  the  patient  (diet, exercise,  lifestyle,  smoking,  high  stress occupation,  etc),  but  some  are  less easily controlled, such as environmental pollution.  

REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES AND BIRTH DEFECTS

Natural  gas  power  plants  are  known  to emit  pollutants  that  have  been  linked  to various  reproductive  issues,  including decreased  fertility, miscarriage,  premature birth,  low  birth‐weight,  infant  and  fetal mortality,  defective  organs,  and neurological  issues.  Risks  of  several  other common  birth  defects,  including  neural tube defects, oral clefts, and cardiovascular defects,  may  also  be  influenced  by exposure to environmental contaminants. 

• Particulate matter (PM) has been demonstrated to be a likely causal factor in both cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality.23

• Studies suggest short-term exposures to particulate matter may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and hospital admissions or emergency department visits for cardiovascular symptoms.24

• Each year, heart disease kills more Americans than cancer.25

• Low birth-weight and preterm birth are important risk factors for infant mortality and birth defects. Low birth-weight infants have a significantly increased risk of infant death, and those who survive are more likely to experience long-term developmental disabilities.26

• Increased levels of ozone and carbon monoxide have been shown to elevated the risk of having a child with serious heart defects.27

• Recent studies report significant associations between particulate matter concentration and the risk of intra-uterine growth reduction and low birth-weight.28

• Growing evidence shows correlations between maternal exposures to air pollutants (e.g., sulfur dioxide and particulates) and preterm birth.29

Photo: The Mothering Coach

Page 6: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

6

www.pacificenvironment.org

Natural Gas Power Plants Emit Dangerous Pollutants

Although natural gas  is often promoted as a “clean”  fossil  fuel, power plants  that generate electricity from  natural  gas  also  create  emissions  that  can  lead  to  adverse  environmental  impacts,  as  well  as exacerbate  health  problems  for  local  communities.  According  to  the  US  EPA,  air  pollutants  are considered “toxic” when they have the potential to cause serious adverse health effects. The following toxic  compounds are  commonly  found  in natural  gas power plant emissions and have been  linked  to various  health  impacts,  including  asthma,  cancer,  stroke,  lung  disease,  and  birth  defects.  These compounds are already present in East Contra Costa County’s air; adding more would only elevate the threat to public health.  

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Description:

• The most harmful NOx is nitrogen dioxide (NO2).

• NOx react with ammonia, moisture, and other compounds to form small particles that penetrate deeply into the lungs.

• NOx is a primary ingredient in the creation of ozone (smog).

• NOx are listed as a “criteria pollutant” by the US EPA.30

Health Effects:

Lung irritation, aggravates asthma or chronic bronchitis, bronchitis and emphysema-like conditions, increases susceptibility to respiratory infections.

Description

• Gas made up of three oxygen atoms (O3).

• Ozone is not emitted directly from power plants, but rather is formed by other emitted pollutants (NOx and VOCs) in the presence of sunlight.

• Ozone is the primary component in smog.

• More visible in summer when hot weather makes ozone levels worse.

• According to US EPA, ozone can be dangerous even at low levels.

• Ozone is listed as a “criteria pollutant” by the US EPA.31

Health Effects:

Coughing, chest pain, shortness of breath, eye, nose, and throat irritation; aggravates asthma, bronchitis, emphysema, and heart disease.

Ground Level Ozone (smog)

Page 7: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

7

www.pacificenvironment.org

Description

• Colorless, odorless gas.

• Created when carbon dioxide (CO2) is not burned completely.

• The highest levels of CO in the outside air typically occur during the colder months of the year when inversion conditions are more frequent, and air pollution becomes trapped near the ground beneath a layer of warm air.

• Carbon Monoxide is listed as a “criteria pollutant” by the US EPA.32

Health Effects:

At high levels, causes death. At low levels, fetal exposure results in underweight birth. Low birth-weight is linked to lifelong health effects like obesity and diabetes.

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

Description

• Made up of a number of components, including acids, organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles.

• Can be formed in the atmosphere from sulfur dioxides (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx).

• Particles can get deep into lungs, and even the bloodstream.

• Particulate matter is listed as a “criteria pollutant” by the US EPA.33

Health Effects:

Premature death, chronic irritation that can trigger asthma attacks. Known to aggravate other lung diseases, cause lung cancer, interfere with blood gas exchange, and increase risk of death from heart disease.

Particulate Matter (PM)

Description

• Important greenhouse gas.

• Widely known as a pollutant responsible for global warming.

• New research suggests that CO2 forms “domes” over areas of mass pollution. These concentrated pockets elevate local levels of CO2, creating warming conditions that increase ozone formation.34

• CO2 domes thus worsen the effects of localized air pollution (pollution from ozone or particulates).

Health Effects:

Most of the effects from CO2 pollution are global, but localized CO2 domes worsen air quality in urban areas, causing respiratory problems, increasing rates of cancer, asthma, respiratory disease, hospitalizations, ER visit, and premature death in those areas.

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Page 8: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

8

www.pacificenvironment.org

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC)

Description

• Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is one of a group of highly reactive gases known as “oxides of sulfur” (SOx).

• The largest sources of SO2 emissions are from power plant fossil fuel combustion.

• SO2 is one of the causes of localized “acid rain”.

• SO2 can react with other compounds in the atmosphere to form small particles which are easily inhaled.

• Sulfur Dioxide is listed as a “criteria pollutant” by the US EPA.36

Health Effects:

Constriction of the airways (more severe in people with asthma); bronchitis-like conditions from chronic exposure.

Particles created by SO2 emissions can cause or worsen respiratory disease, such as emphysema and bronchitis. They can also aggravate existing heart disease, leading to increased hospital admissions and premature death.

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

Description

• VOCs are a large class of carbon-containing chemicals that evaporate readily into the air. Some VOCs, referred to as “Reactive Organic Gases,” are a primary ingredient in the creation of ozone (smog).

• Some VOCs are toxic, some are carcinogenic, and some are both toxic and carcinogenic.

• Toxic Air Contaminants is a class of chemicals that includes toxic VOCs and other kinds of toxic air pollutants.

Examples of Toxic Air Contaminants emitted from natural gas power plants include:

Ammonia, cyanide, arsenic, formaldehyde, chlorine, lead, mercury, cadmium, and benzene.35

Health Effects:

Toxic Air Contaminants can cause a variety of health problems, including organ damage, genetic mutations, reproductive problems, and cancer.

*Note: Information and data taken from the EPA website (unless otherwise noted). More information can be found at http://www.epa.gov.   

Page 9: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

9

www.pacificenvironment.org

Don’t Become a Statistic: Protect Your Community

It  has  been  shown  that  there  are  links between  socio‐economic  factors  (ex:  edu‐cation,  income,  occupation)  and  people’s health. This may be due to the fact that,  in general, people with lower incomes tend to live in more environmentally polluted areas, have  reduced access  to health  care,  and  in some  cases,  suffer  a  language  barrier  that puts  them  at  a  disadvantage  for  receiving services.  In  Contra  Costa  County,  working class  communities  of  color,  in  particular, bear a disproportionate share of health risk 

due to environmental factors. Increased health risks may include elevated instances of cancer, asthma, heart attacks and other serious health problems related to higher exposures to toxic air contaminants. 

Here are some statistics:

• According to Contra Costa Health Services, the hospitalization rate for asthma in African American children in Contra Costa County is four times higher than that for Caucasian children.37

• Residents of Bay Point can expect on average to die 11 years sooner than those living in Orinda.38

• Chronic diseases like asthma, heart disease, and diabetes have become the leading causes of death and disability, disproportionately impacting low-income and minority communities.39

• In a recent UCLA study, women who live in areas with the highest levels of air pollutants have three times the risk of having babies with birth defects than those living in areas with the cleanest air.40

• Estimated toxic air pollution related cancer risk in the Antioch area is 30-60 times higher than the level commonly deemed acceptable in California (assuming lifetime exposure).41

• The incidence of stroke and cancer related deaths in Contra Costa County are both significantly higher than the state average.42

• Rates of breast cancer are more disproportionate for women in Contra Costa County over other women in the state, and especially amongst African-American women.43

Phot

o: U

nive

rsit

y of

Pit

tsbu

rg

The bottom line is that Contra Costa County residents are already exposed to some of the highest levels of  toxic  emissions  in  the  entire  state  of  California,  and  often  suffer  poor  air  quality  as  a  result.  In addition, although only one out of nine Bay Area counties, Contra Costa  is forced to bear over half of the electricity generation, along with the associated environmental and health effects.  

Page 10: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

10

www.pacificenvironment.org

Take Action  Today!  Everyone has  the  right  to  breathe  clean  air,  and now  is  the  time  for  Contra  Costa  County  residents  to  demand  this right.  Good  jobs  do  not  have  to  come  at  the  price  of  your  family’s health;  there  is  another  way  to  create  jobs  in  the  energy  sector without relying on polluting fossil fuels.  

According  to  a  recent  study,  while  overall  employment  fell  by  one percent  in  California  from 2007  to  2008,  growth  in  green  businesses grew by 5 percent,  and  the Bay Area  led  the  rest of  the State  in  the creation of clean energy jobs.44 This is an emerging field that promises future  growth,  as  we  are  inevitably  heading  towards  a  renewable energy  future,  and  California’s  utilities will  be  forced  to  comply with 

the State’s renewable portfolio standard (33% of the State’s energy must be renewable by 2020). In order to  provide  quality  “green”  jobs  for  Contra  Costa  County  community  members,  local  leaders  should  be working to attract the type of “clean tech” companies that are currently being created in California. 

Contact your  state and  federal  representatives!  Tell  them you oppose  these  two new  facilities  in Contra Costa County, and that you want to see incentives to attract green businesses to Contra Costa County: 

Assemblywoman Joan Buchanan: 916‐319‐2015 (Oakley) 

Assemblyman Tom Torlakson: 916‐319‐2011 (Antioch) 

Senator Mark De Saulnier: 916‐651‐4007 

Congressman John Garamendi: 202‐225‐1880 

Phot

o: R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Cen

ter

Glossary of Terms

Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD): Regional agency charged with planning, regulatory authority and enforcement to achieve air quality standards in the nine‐county Bay Area. 

California Air Resources Board (CARB):  is  the "clean air agency" of the California State Government, and part of the California Environmental  Protection  Agency.  Goals  include  attaining  and  maintaining  healthy  air  quality,  protecting  the  public  from exposure to toxic air contaminants; and providing innovative approaches for complying with air pollution rules and regulations. 

California  Energy  Commission  (CEC):  California’s  primary  energy  policy  and  planning  agency,  responsible  for  deciding  future energy needs, promoting energy efficiency, and supporting renewable energy technologies. 

California  Public  Utilities  Commission  (CPUC  or  PUC):  commission  that  regulates  privately‐owned  utilities  in  the  state  of California including electric power, telecommunication, natural gas, and water companies. Headquarters are in San Francisco. 

Criteria pollutant  (criteria  air  contaminant):  air  pollutants  listed by  the US  EPA as  especially  harmful  to  air  quality,  and must adhere to national regulation standards for air quality. These compounds are known to cause smog, acid rain, and human and environmental health hazards. 

Megawatt (MW): Measurement for energy production. A megawatt is equal to 1000 watts.  

Once through cooling (OTC): System of cooling industrial facilities, such as power plants. Pulls water directly from a water source (river,  lake,  ocean),  runs  it  though  the  facility,  and  ejects  it  back  where  it  came  from.  Thermal  pollution  from  OTC  causes environmental effects, such as changes in habitat, loss of biodiversity, and other ecological impacts. 

Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) list: Available from the US EPA, the TRI is a publicly available database containing information on toxic releases and other waste management activities in the United States. 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA, or EPA): Federal government agency responsible for the protection of human health and the environment. Writes and enforces regulations based on laws passed by Congress. 

Page 11: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

11

www.pacificenvironment.org

Endnotes:

1. The power plants referred to here are Contra Costa 6 & 7. 2. The two existing OTC plants, Contra Costa 6 &7, ran less than four percent of the time in 2006 according to the California Energy Commission.

http://www.energy.ca.gov/siting/documents/2008-05-20_CHAIRMAN_SWRCB.PDF 3. See: www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cd/transportation/cleanairplan.pdf 4. http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/powerplants/POWER_PLANTS.XLS 5. For more information, visit http://www.scorecard.org/env-releases/county.tcl?fips_county_code=06013#maps.) 6. See: http://www.epa.gov/region09/toxic/tri/report/07/tri-ca.html 7. Scorecard: The Pollution Information Website, Criteria Air Pollutant Report for Contra Costa County, available at http://www.scorecard.org/env-

releases/cap/county.tcl?fips_county_code=06013 8. See Air Resources Board, Facility Search Engine, available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/ei/disclaim.htm 9. See www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cd/transportation/cleanairplan.pdf 10. Ibid. 11. See, e.g., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cleaning Up Common Pollutants, available at http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/peg/cleanup.html;

California Air Resources Board, Asthma and Air Pollution, available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/asthma/asthma.htm 12. “Low income” is here defined as earning less than 200% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). In 2005, 200% of the FPL was around 19K/year for

individuals and 32K for a family of three. See Community Health Indicator for Contra Costa County, Community Health Assessment, Planning and Evaluation Group Executive Report (June 2007), available at http://cchealth.org/health_data/hospital_council_2007

13. See Contra Costa Health Services, Blueprint for Asthma Action: A Report for Awareness and Advocacy in Contra Costa County, available at www.cchealth.org/topics/asthma/pdf/blueprint_for_asthma_cover.pdf)

14. See Department of Health and Human Services, 2002 15. Ibid 16. See Contra Costa Asthma Coalition, available at http://www.calendow.org/uploadedFiles/CAFA3_CCscreen.pdf 17. http://www.pediatricasthma.org/about/asthma_burden, citing Wang LY, Zhong Y, Wheeler L. “Direct and Indirect Costs of Asthma in School-Age

Children.” Preventing Chronic Disease , 2(1): [serial online], January 2005 18. See EPA report of the environment- human disease and condition:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/eroe/index.cfm?fuseaction=list.listBySubTopic&lv=list.listByChapter&ch=49&s=381 19. American Lung Association. 2008. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) fact sheet. Accessed February 2009.

http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=9oICLOOxGrF&b=1541153 20. EPA report of the environment- human disease and condition:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/eroe/index.cfm?fuseaction=list.listBySubTopic&lv=list.listByChapter&ch=49&s=381 21. Lung Cancer, Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and Long-term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution, Journal of the American Medical Association (Vol.

287, No. 9: 1132-1141) 22. EPA report of the environment- human disease and condition:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/eroe/index.cfm?fuseaction=list.listBySubTopic&lv=list.listByChapter&ch=49&s=381 23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Air quality criteria for particulate matter. Volumes I (EPA/600/P-99/002aF) and II (EPA/600/P-

99/002bF). National Center for Environmental Assessment—RTP Office, Office of Research and Development. 24. University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Public Health and the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program (CBCMP)

http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/155/1/17.pdf 25. United States (1999). “Chronic Disease Overview” US Government. http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/overview_text.htm. 26. National Center for Health Statistics. 2001. Healthy people 2000 final review. Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service. p. 208.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hp2000/hp2k01-acc.pdf 27. University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Public Health and the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program

(CBCMP)http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/155/1/17.pdf 28. Behrman, R.E., and A. Stith Butler, eds. 2007. Preterm birth: Causes, consequences, and prevention. Committee on Understanding Premature Birth

and Assuring Healthy Outcomes. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Washington, DC: National Academic Press. 29. University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Public Health and the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program (CBCMP)

http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/155/1/17.pdf 30. For more information on the health effects of Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), see http://www.epa.gov/air/nitrogenoxides/health.html 31. For more information on the dangers and health effects of ozone, see “Smog - Who Does it Hurt?”, downloadable at

http://www.epa.gov/air/ozonepollution/health.html 32. For more information on the health effects of Carbon Monoxide (CO), see http://www.epa.gov/air/urbanair/co/hlth1.html 33. For more information on health effects from particulate matter pollution, see http://www.epa.gov/air/particlepollution/health.html 34. For more information on CO2 domes, see Mark Jacobson’s research “Enhancement of local air pollution by urban CO2 domes”

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es903018m?cookieSet=1&journalCode=esthag 35. To see exactly which Toxic Air Contaminants are coming out of industries in your area, please refer to the Bay Area Air Quality Management

District’s reports on Toxic Air Contaminant inventories: http://www.baaqmd.gov/Divisions/Engineering/Air-Toxics/Toxic-Air-Contaminant-Control-Program-Annual-Report.aspx

36. For more information on the health effects of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), see http://www.epa.gov/air/sulfurdioxide/health.html 37. Contra Costa Health Services, Health Disparities in Contra Costa, available at http://cchealth.org/groups/rhdi/pdf/health_disparities_in_cc.pdf 38. Community Health Indicators for Contra Costa County, 2007. Prepared by the Community Health Assessment, Planning and Evaluation Group

(CHAPE), Public Health Division, Contra Costa Health Services. 39. Contra Costa Health Services, Health Disparities in Contra Costa, available at http://cchealth.org/groups/rhdi/pdf/health_disparities_in_cc.pdf 40. University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Public Health and the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program (CBCMP)

http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/155/1/17.pdf 41. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Regional Toxics Modeling and Cancer Risk Evaluation, CARE Task Force Meeting, Staff Power Point Presentation (Sept. 17, 2008). See U.S. EPA, Cleaning Up Common Pollutants, available at http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/peg/cleanup.html 42 & 43 Ibid 44. http://www.nextten.org/next10/pdf/NT_state_Release_FINAL.pdf

Page 12: Document

Pacific Environment April 2010

12

www.pacificenvironment.org

Written by: Andrea Barnetche, Pacific Environment

Andrea is currently a volunteer with the California Energy Program at Pacific Environment. She has a Masters Degree in Environmental Management from the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, and a B.S. in Evolution, Ecology, and Biodiversity from the University of California, Davis.

Edited by: Rory Cox, California Energy Program Director, Pacific Environment

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENT protects the living environment of the Pacific Rim by promoting grassroots activism, strengthening communities, and reforming international policies.

Pacific Environment 251 Kearny Street, Second Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 Ph: 415.399.8850 [email protected]