how well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

24
How to spot a quality screening measure Frances Page Glascoe www.pedstest.com www.forepath.org

Upload: dinhcong

Post on 04-Jan-2017

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

How to spot a quality screening measure

Frances Page Glascoewww.pedstest.comwww.forepath.org

Page 2: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?
Page 3: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

STANDARDIZATION

Children with disabilities ( 16% - 18% of total)

Naturalistic sample

Large, nationally representativeProportionate Demographics: minorities, parents’ level of education, broad geographic locations, Spanish speakers, etc.

Page 4: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?
Page 5: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?
Page 6: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

Inter-rater--at least 85%

Test-retest--at least 85%

Internal consistency > .80

RELIABILITY

Page 7: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?
Page 8: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

How well does a screen actually measure what

the authors claim?

Page 9: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

Good

Poor

Good

Poor

SCREEN DX TEST

Page 10: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

?

?

DX TESTGood

Poor

SCREEN

Page 11: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

VALIDITYConcurrent: battery should sample same domains as screen Discriminant: information on how well various kinds of problems are detectedPredictive: optional but helpful for showing that items sample enduring aspects of development

Page 12: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

Criterion Measure/Gold Standard

SCREEN

Page 13: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY

=

ACCURACY

Page 14: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?
Page 15: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

Screening sorts those who probably have

problems from those who probably don’t

Page 16: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

ACCURACYSPECIFICITY = % of children without problems correctly detected (e.g., by passing, above cutoffs scores)SENSITIVITY = % of children with problems correctly detected70% to 80% is the standard

Page 17: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?
Page 18: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

SPECIFICITY

Page 19: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

SENSITIVITY

Page 20: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

Accuracy of the Denver-II

Denver-II PASS 86

FAIL 27

69 8

Specificity = 69/86 = 80%

17 10

86 18

Developmental DX

NO YES

Sensitivity = 10/18 = 56%

Page 21: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

ACCURACY:ACROSS AGE RANGES

AGE SENSITIVITY SPECIFICITY

N % N %0 - 18 mos 3/4 75 66/82 8018 mos - 3 yrs 27/34 79 117/149 793 - 4 1/2 yrs 26/35 74 118/165 724 1/2 - 8 yrs 42/57 74 172/245 70TOTAL 98/130 75 473/641 74

Page 22: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

Rigorously Peer-reviewed

Page 23: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

Because of the enormous expense involved in standardization, reliabilty and validity research and accuracy studies, tests are expensive to create, keep current, provide translations, and to ensure that users and researchers have support and guidance. For these reasons, tests costs money and it is why few measures can be photocopied. The money, however small, you spend when purchasing measures goes to their continued development.

Page 24: How well does a screen actually measure what the authors claim?

Detection rates WITH Screening Tests

70% to 80% of children with developmental disabilities correctly identified

Squires et al, JDBP. 1996;17:420 - 427

80% to 90% of children with mental health problems correctly identified

Sturner, JDBP . 1991; 12: 51-64

Most over-referrals on standardized screens are children with below average development and psychosocial risk factors

Glascoe, APAM. 2001; 155:54-59. -