how to describe an archaeological object
TRANSCRIPT
Principles of object description
1. An audio description for a blind person
2. Replacing the object with a record
3. The PAS’s ‘shop window’
Relationship between text and images
If we’ve got an image, why do we need all this text?
• Searching image labels is a very blunt tool giving imprecise results
• The wrong image may be attached or the image may become detached
• It makes the identifier look very closely and analytically at the object
Relationship between text and images
If we’ve got an image, why do we need all this text?
• Searching image labels is a very blunt tool giving imprecise results
• The wrong image may be attached or the image may become detached
• It makes the identifier look very closely and analytically at the object
Audiences and searchers
There are many users of our data – HER officers, planners, finds specialists, students, finders, the general public
Will all of the people interested in this object be able to find it again?
These will make records unfindable
• Spelling and typing mistakes, e.g. broach, boarder, chaffing dish, seal matirx, etc.
• The wrong object term being used, e.g. ‘strap fitting’ for a stirrup-strap mount
• The wrong classification being used, e.g. ‘cruciform’ for a cross-shaped brooch or ‘equal-armed’ for an ansate brooch
• Several terms used for the same concept, e.g. pierced, perforated, holed
These will make records unintelligible!
• Information scattered about the record in a random order
• Ambiguity in words or phrasing
• Abbreviations and writing in note form
• Too much jargon
KENT4547
FAHG-123AB4
LON-B3C3C1
SUSS-0DF748
These will make records unintelligible!
• Information scattered about the record in a random order
• Ambiguity in words or phrasing
• Abbreviations and writing in note form
• Too much jargon
These are all ‘round’ but all must be described differently
Buns More buns
Bun-shaped… … or bun shaped objects on the PAS database
ESS-581F82
back
reverse
YORYM-1716A4
The first section is circular in section, but the second section has a rectangular section and the last section is triangular in section.
Too many sections
LON-B3C3C1
LANCUM-593AA1
SWYOR-C16415
‘thin’
‘narrow’
“two rows of small triangular indentations run along both longitudinal edges”
- there are two rows, but not along both edges!
These will make records unintelligible!
• Information scattered about the record in a random order
• Ambiguity in words or phrasing
• Abbreviations and writing in note form
• Too much jargon
Don’t copy something like this (NMS736):
EPM Ae sword chape, double-concave attachment edge between central projection front and back, trefoils on sides pierced for attachment, traces of engraved linear decoration, knop at terminal, 42 x 30mm. Cf. de Reuck, no. 231.
Short descriptions for objects that exist in museum collections
from Middle Harling, Norfolk (East Anglian Archaeology 74)
• Measurements can need supporting information (e.g. ‘Surviving length 42.4 mm, original length c. 60 mm; or 8.5 mm wide in the centre, tapering to 6.8 mm wide at either end)
• Dates can need argument to back them up (e.g. ‘this object type is most common in the 14th century, but the use of niello inlaid in a criss-cross pattern suggests a late 15th- if not early 16th-century date for this particular example’ or ‘Margeson (1993, no. 258) illustrates a similar object from a 17th-century context in Norwich’)
• Completeness – it helps to know whether the break is fresh (showing possible recent agricultural damage) or worn (possibly broken in antiquity or showing long-term agricultural damage).
• Material – for a copper-alloy and iron item, which parts are copper alloy and which parts iron?
‘Oval shaped’ = oval‘Oval shaped in form’ = oval‘Triangular shaped’ = triangular, etc etc etc
A medieval copper-alloy buckle. The buckle has a frame and plate. The buckle’s frame is oval. The oval frame has a straight bar. The straight bar is square in cross-section. On the straight bar is a copper-alloy pin. The pin has an open loop.
etc etc etc ad nauseam!
Avoid unnecessary words
SF-B236E4
LANCUM-3DF1F3
Anglo-Scandinavian stirrup terminal, NMS-364F65
Post-medieval book clasp, SF6153
Modern objects
1. The finder is desperate to get something on the database and you want to be kind
2. A good example of a difficult object, although not in itself intrinsically interesting
3. It has research potential
GLO-6A97F0
BERK-600AC6
The usual cut-off date is c. 1700 AD, but there are exceptions:
SF-083C15
LVPL-0B5F41
correct
not correct!
LVPL-340D82