how to brief a legal case
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
How to Brief a Legal Case
Valerie Lang Waldin, J.D., M.L.S.
![Page 2: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What is a case brief?A case brief is a condensed, concise outline-form summary of a court
opinion. A law student’s case brief is very different from a legal brief by an
attorney, and an undergraduate student’s case brief will differ from a law student’s.
A community college student’s case brief will differ from an that of an undergraduate depending on the course of study.
This guide is intended primarily for community college students.
![Page 3: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Basic Format for a Case Brief:• Generally, a case brief takes this form (we will address these individually):
• Facts• Issue• Holding or Ruling• Application of the law to the facts of the case (can also be called Rationale, or Reasoning)
• Bottom line: Follow your professor’s specific format instructions.
![Page 4: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
This brief format is a little more involved:
• EXAMPLE: Constitutional Law - Case Brief Format for Final Project
• Name of Case:• Citation:
• Prior Proceedings:• Facts:
• Issue(s):
• Decision (or Holding or Ruling) of Supreme Court:• Author of Majority Opinion:• Reasoning of Majority Opinion:• Summary of Other Opinions (dissenting, concurring):
![Page 5: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Keep in mind:
United States Supreme Court cases are characteristically
lengthier and more detailed than state cases.
Example: Mapp v. Ohio, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 1961 is a pivotal case in which evidence seized by an unconstitutional search was
inadmissible (under the 4th and 14th Amendments).
![Page 6: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
THIS is why we brief cases.• Mapp v. Ohio (as shown on Cornell's Legal Information Institute site)
![Page 7: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Let’s break it down piece by piece.
![Page 8: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
*Depending on your professor’s instructions…
2 ½ to 3 typed pages total (length approximations recommended below; will vary depending on case):
Facts 1 pageIssue 1 sentenceHolding or Ruling 1-2 sentencesApplication 1 – 1 ½ pages
![Page 9: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
FACTS
![Page 10: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
This is the text of of Mapp v. Ohio provided on the Cornell Legal
Information Institute site.
The FACTS of a legal case usually are stated in a few paragraphs at the
beginning of the judge’s opinion.
![Page 11: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
FACTS
![Page 12: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ISSUE
ISSUE = What is the question the parties are asking the court to resolve?
![Page 13: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Issue
End of facts (Facts of course may be referred to again in the opinion, but basically this is the end of the fact
pattern for purposes of your brief.)
The ISSUE is normally found after the fact
summary but before the court gets into legal
precedent and explaining its reasoning.
When writing the brief, you need to condense the issue into a manageable
legal question.
Here the court is starting to discuss prior court decisions (legal precedent), the Constitution, and applicable
statutes, paving the way for the HOLDING (decision) with its REASONING.
![Page 14: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
HOLDING
HOLDING (OR RULING OR DECISION) = What did the court decide?
(Affirmed, Reversed, Remanded?)
![Page 15: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
HoldingThe Holding (may also be called Ruling) is a statement of the court’s decision. It will appear at the end of the opinion.
We will come back to concurring and dissenting opinions; for now just know
that the Holding (Ruling) is stated at the end of the majority opinion, which is
the decision & reasoning of the majority of the judges of a court,
written by one judge.
Justice Clark wrote the majority opinion for the Court in Mapp v. Ohio.
![Page 16: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
APPLICATION
Application or Reasoning = Why did the court decide as it did?
![Page 17: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
APPLICATION of the law to the facts of the case
Critical part of case (APPLICATION, REASONING) as it applies the law to the facts of the case thereby setting legal precedent
![Page 18: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Let’s go back to Westlaw for a second.
![Page 19: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Headnotes
Headnotes are written by Westlaw attorney-editors.
Headnotes concisely state the points of law (or legal
concepts) in the case.
Invaluable!
“A headnote is a single sentence that reflects a point of law made by the court. Attorney-editors craft a headnote for every specific point of law covered in every published opinion, making it possible to quickly determine what the
case means and whether it is relevant.” http://blog.legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/legal-research/reference-attorney-tips/07-08-13
/
![Page 20: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
As indicated early on:
• A law student case brief is very different from a brief by an attorney, and an undergraduate student’s brief will differ from a law student’s.
• This guide to case law briefing is intended primarily for community college students.
![Page 22: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
So what does a finished
BRIEF look like?
![Page 23: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Westlaw briefs are sophisticated legal briefs submitted by licensed attorneys practicing before the United States Supreme Court.
![Page 24: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
If you select “Brief It” when printing a case in Westlaw, you will only get the case
Headnotes! Headnotes are the legal points of law in the
case, but do not include sufficient facts, articulation of the issue, or detailed
application of the law to the facts of the case.
![Page 25: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The Point:You need to write your own brief based on assignment instructions, and it should look
something like this:
![Page 26: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Mapp v. Ohio 81 S.Ct.1684
• Facts: Three Cleveland police officers arrived at the petitioner’s residence on a tip that a bombing suspect was hiding out there and that paraphernalia regarding the bombing was hidden there. The officers knocked and asked to enter, but the petitioner refused to admit them without a search warrant after speaking with her attorney. The officers left and returned approximately three hours later with what seemed to be a search warrant. When the petitioner failed to answer the door, the officers forcibly entered the residence. The petitioner’s attorney arrived and was not permitted to see the petitioner or to enter the residence. The petitioner demanded to see the search warrant and when presented, she grabbed it and placed it in her shirt. Police struggled with the petitioner and eventually recovered the warrant. The petitioner was then placed under arrest for being belligerent and taken to her bedroom on the second floor of the residence. The officers then conducted a widespread search of the residence and found obscene materials in a trunk in the basement. The petitioner was ultimately convicted of possessing these materials. The petitioner/defendant was convicted in an Ohio Common Pleas Court and on appeal the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the conviction. Petitioner/defendant appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
• Issue: Is evidence discovered during a search and seizure conducted in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution admissible in a state court?
Your NameCourseProfessor
![Page 27: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Mapp v. Ohio81 S.Ct.1684• Held. In a 6-3 decision, the Court overturned the petitioner’s conviction, and held that the states
were bound to exclude evidence seized in violation of the 4th Amendment.
• Application. In the majority opinion, Justice Tom Clark wrote for the Court that all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution is inadmissible in a state court. Justice Clark went on to say, “ Were it otherwise…the assurance against unreasonable…searches and seizures would be meaningless.” The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter illegally obtaining evidence and to compel respect for the constitutional guarantee in the only effective manner. The Court thus ensured that in either state or federal court, no individual is to be convicted on unconstitutional evidence. The 4th Amendment sets the standards for searches and seizures by law enforcement officials in the United States, the Court noted, and the 14th Amendment requires judges to uphold those standards in every state. Evidence gained by an illegal search became inadmissible in state courts as a result of the Mapp decision. The Court developed the exclusionary rule for illegal evidence, and drew on the Weeks case, 1914, and Elkins, 1960, culminated with the decision reached in Mapp, 1961.
![Page 28: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
If your brief assignment is more
detailed……it’s really not that much more complicated.
![Page 29: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
EXAMPLE: Constitutional Law - Case Brief Format for Final Project
• Name of Case:• Citation:
• Prior Proceedings:• Facts:
• Issue(s):
• Decision (or Holding or Ruling) of Supreme Court:• Author of Majority Opinion:• Reasoning of Majority Opinion:• Summary of Other Opinions (dissenting, concurring):
![Page 30: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Name of Case: Mapp v. Ohio
Citation: 392 U.S. 188 or S.Ct. 1868
Prior Proceedings: The petitioner/defendant was convicted in an Ohio Common Pleas Court and on appeal the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the conviction (16 O.O.2d 384). Petitioner/defendant appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Citations are the volume number, reporter, and page number. These are
called parallel citations because they bring you to same case. It’s like a journal article
being published in multiple journals.
Lower court decision and law reviews (not the U.S. Supreme Court case)
![Page 31: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Summary of Other Opinions
(dissenting, concurring):
![Page 32: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Summary of Other Opinions
(dissenting, concurring):
Dissenting (disagreeing) opinions
are usually found after
the concurring (supporting)
opinion.
![Page 33: How to Brief a Legal Case](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/589efde31a28ab06368b5c77/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
And that is case briefing in a nutshell.
Questions? Contact Valerie Lang Waldin, J.D., M.L.S. in the Marvin Library 141 or visit the HVCC Law Research Genius.