how the past influenced human research protection regulations

33
How the Past Influenced Human How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations Research Protection Regulations Shirley J. Hicks Shirley J. Hicks Director, Division of Education and Development Director, Division of Education and Development Office for Human Research Protections Office for Human Research Protections U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services February 14, 2007 February 14, 2007

Upload: yamin

Post on 14-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations. Shirley J. Hicks Director, Division of Education and Development Office for Human Research Protections U.S. Department of Health and Human Services February 14, 2007. Outline. Overview of Regulated Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

How the Past Influenced Human How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection RegulationsResearch Protection Regulations

Shirley J. HicksShirley J. HicksDirector, Division of Education and DevelopmentDirector, Division of Education and Development

Office for Human Research Protections Office for Human Research Protections U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesU.S. Department of Health and Human Services

February 14, 2007February 14, 2007

Page 2: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

OutlineOutline

Overview of Regulated Research

Overview of OHRP

A Few Historical Events and their

Effect on Human Research

Protections

Page 3: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

U.S. Regulated Human Subject U.S. Regulated Human Subject Research Research

Page 4: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

U.S. Regulated U.S. Regulated Research Research Research utilizing an FDA Research utilizing an FDA

regulated product (drugs, regulated product (drugs, biologics or devices)biologics or devices)

Research supported or conducted Research supported or conducted by a “Common Rule” Department by a “Common Rule” Department or Agency of the Federal or Agency of the Federal Government Government

Page 5: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Signatories to the Federal Signatories to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Policy for the Protection of

Human SubjectsHuman Subjects ““The Common Rule”The Common Rule” Adopted June 18, 1991Adopted June 18, 1991

Departments of Agriculture, Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Homeland Security, HUD, Energy, Homeland Security, HUD, Justice, Transportation, Veterans Justice, Transportation, Veterans Affairs, and Affairs, and HHSHHS. NSF, NASA, EPA, . NSF, NASA, EPA, AID, CIA, Social Security and the AID, CIA, Social Security and the Consumer Product Safety CommissionConsumer Product Safety Commission

Page 6: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

HHS Regulated Human Subject HHS Regulated Human Subject ResearchResearch

Page 7: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Research Supported or Research Supported or Conducted by HHSConducted by HHS National Institutes of Health (NIH)National Institutes of Health (NIH) Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality

(AHRQ) (AHRQ) Health Resources & Services Administration Health Resources & Services Administration

(HRSA)(HRSA) Food & Drug Administration (FDA)Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Administration on Aging (AoA)Administration on Aging (AoA) Administration for Children & Families (ACF)Administration for Children & Families (ACF) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

(CMS)(CMS) Indian Health Services (IHS)Indian Health Services (IHS)

Page 8: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

HHS RegulationsHHS Regulations

Title 45 Code of Federal Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46 (45 CFR Regulations Part 46 (45 CFR 46) 46)

Basic Policy for the Protection Basic Policy for the Protection of Human Research Subjectsof Human Research Subjects – – Subpart ASubpart A

- - Originally adopted May, 1974Originally adopted May, 1974

- Latest Revision June 23, 2005- Latest Revision June 23, 2005

Page 9: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Additional Protections Additional Protections Included in 45 CFR 46Included in 45 CFR 46

Subpart BSubpart B - Additional DHHS Protections - Additional DHHS Protections for Pregnant Women, Human Fetuses for Pregnant Women, Human Fetuses and Neonates Involved in Research and Neonates Involved in Research (revised November 13, 2001)(revised November 13, 2001)

Subpart CSubpart C - Additional DHHS Protections - Additional DHHS Protections Pertaining to Biomedical and Behavioral Pertaining to Biomedical and Behavioral Research Involving Prisoners as SubjectsResearch Involving Prisoners as Subjects

Subpart DSubpart D - Additional DHHS Protections - Additional DHHS Protections for Children Involved as Subjects in for Children Involved as Subjects in Research Research

Page 10: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Department of Health & Human Services Organizational Chart

Page 11: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Department of Health and Human Department of Health and Human Services Organizational ChartServices Organizational Chart

(Selected Portion)(Selected Portion)

The SecretaryDeputy Secretary

Assistant Secretary for Health

Office for Human Research Protections

Office of Public Health & ScienceU.S. Public Health Service

Commissioned Corp

Page 12: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

OHRP Organization ChartOHRP Organization Chart

Office of the DirectorBernard Schwetz, Director

Melody Lin, Deputy DirectorMichael Carome, Associate Director,

Regulatory Affairs

Secy’s Advisory Committee(SACHRP)

Kathy Slatinshek Executive Director

Division of Education & DevelopmentShirley Hicks, Director

Division of Compliance OversightKristina Borror, Director

International ActivitiesMelody Lin, Activity Director

Division of Policy and AssurancesIrene Stith-Coleman, Director

Page 13: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Historical Events and Human Research Protections

Page 14: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

1946 Nuremberg Trial1946 Nuremberg Trial

During the Nuremberg During the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, 23 War Crimes Trials, 23 German doctors were German doctors were charged with crimes charged with crimes against humanity foragainst humanity for “performing medical “performing medical experiments upon concentration camp experiments upon concentration camp inmates and other living human subjects, inmates and other living human subjects, without their consent, in the course of which without their consent, in the course of which experiments the defendants committed the experiments the defendants committed the murders, brutalities, cruelties, tortures, murders, brutalities, cruelties, tortures, atrocities, and other inhuman acts.”atrocities, and other inhuman acts.”

Page 15: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

The Nuremberg Code The Nuremberg Code

As part of the verdict, the Court As part of the verdict, the Court enumerated some rules for "Permissible enumerated some rules for "Permissible Medical Experiments", now known as Medical Experiments", now known as the “Nuremberg Code”. These rules the “Nuremberg Code”. These rules include:include:

voluntary consentvoluntary consent benefits outweigh risksbenefits outweigh risks ability of the subject to terminate ability of the subject to terminate

participationparticipation

Page 16: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Thalidomide TragedyThalidomide Tragedy

Thousands of birth defects in EuropeThousands of birth defects in Europe FDA’s Medical Officer, Dr. Frances FDA’s Medical Officer, Dr. Frances

Kelsey, avoided approving the drugKelsey, avoided approving the drug Following the tragedy in Following the tragedy in 19621962, ,

Congress passed the Kefaufer-Harris Congress passed the Kefaufer-Harris Amendments, requiring all drugs to Amendments, requiring all drugs to prove efficacy and safety before prove efficacy and safety before approval.approval.

Page 17: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

1964- Declaration of 1964- Declaration of HelsinkiHelsinki

Recommendations Guiding Recommendations Guiding Medical Doctors in Biomedical Medical Doctors in Biomedical Research Involving Human Research Involving Human SubjectsSubjects Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, 1964.1964.

Subsequently revised over the yearsSubsequently revised over the years

““Concern for the interests of the subject must always Concern for the interests of the subject must always prevail over the interests of science and society.”prevail over the interests of science and society.”

Page 18: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

1966 – Henry Beecher’s 1966 – Henry Beecher’s ArticleArticle

““Ethics and Clinical Research”Ethics and Clinical Research”Henry K. BeecherHenry K. BeecherNew England Journal of Medicine (1966)New England Journal of Medicine (1966)

22 published medical studies presenting 22 published medical studies presenting risk to subjects without their knowledge or risk to subjects without their knowledge or approvalapproval

Published in some of the most prestigious Published in some of the most prestigious journals and conducted at some of the journals and conducted at some of the most prestigious institutionsmost prestigious institutions

Page 19: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Examples of Unethical Examples of Unethical Research Research Willowbrook School, NY– Willowbrook School, NY– deliberately infecteddeliberately infected

mentally retarded children with hepatitis virusmentally retarded children with hepatitis virus Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital, NY - Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital, NY -

Injected live cancer cells into non-consenting elderly Injected live cancer cells into non-consenting elderly patientspatients

Milgram Study, Yale University -Milgram Study, Yale University -"Behavioral study of obedience""Behavioral study of obedience"

Tea Room Trade Study, St. Louis – Tea Room Trade Study, St. Louis – Homosexual encounters in men’s rooms in pHomosexual encounters in men’s rooms in public placesublic places

Page 20: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

In In 1966 1966 the Department of the Department of Health Education and Welfare Health Education and Welfare (DHEW), Public Health Service (DHEW), Public Health Service (PHS), National Institutes of (PHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued policies for Health (NIH) issued policies for the protection of human subjects the protection of human subjects in researchin research

Public Health Service Public Health Service PolicyPolicy

Page 21: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Requirements for Public Requirements for Public Health Service Grantee Health Service Grantee InstitutionsInstitutions Three topics to be addressed by prior committee Three topics to be addressed by prior committee

review for all PHS-supported human subject review for all PHS-supported human subject research:research:– Protection of the rights and welfare of the Protection of the rights and welfare of the

subjectssubjects– Assure appropriate methods of informed Assure appropriate methods of informed

consentconsent– Determine acceptable balance of risks and Determine acceptable balance of risks and

benefitsbenefits Beginnings of the Institutional Review Board (IRB)Beginnings of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) 1971 - Institutional Guide to DHEW Policy on the 1971 - Institutional Guide to DHEW Policy on the

Protection of Human SubjectsProtection of Human Subjects

Page 22: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

1972 – Report of U.S. 1972 – Report of U.S. Public Health Service Public Health Service Syphilis StudySyphilis Study

Public Health Service (PHS) Public Health Service (PHS) study conducted from study conducted from 1932 to 1972, in Macon Co., 1932 to 1972, in Macon Co., Alabama. Examined theAlabama. Examined the

natural course of untreated syphilis in natural course of untreated syphilis in African-American men. The subjects African-American men. The subjects were unknowing participants in the were unknowing participants in the study; they were not told that they had study; they were not told that they had syphilis, nor were they offered syphilis, nor were they offered effective treatment effective treatment

Page 23: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

National Research ActNational Research Act

1973 Kennedy Hearings “Quality of 1973 Kennedy Hearings “Quality of Health Care - Human Health Care - Human Experimentation”Experimentation”

1974 National Research Act1974 National Research Act– Established the “National Commission Established the “National Commission

for the Protection of Human Subjects of for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research”Biomedical and Behavioral Research”

– Required IRBs at institutions receiving Required IRBs at institutions receiving DHEW support for human subjects DHEW support for human subjects researchresearch

Page 24: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

The Belmont ReportThe Belmont Report

Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of ResearchProtection of Human Subjects of Research

The National Commission for the Protection of The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral

ResearchResearch

April 18, 1979April 18, 1979

Page 25: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

The Belmont ReportThe Belmont Report

Basic Ethical Principles:Basic Ethical Principles: Respect for PersonsRespect for Persons

– Individual autonomyIndividual autonomy– Protection of individuals with reduced Protection of individuals with reduced

autonomyautonomy BeneficenceBeneficence

– Maximize benefits and minimize harmsMaximize benefits and minimize harms JusticeJustice

– Equitable distribution of research costs and Equitable distribution of research costs and benefitsbenefits

Page 26: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

1974 - Regulations for the 1974 - Regulations for the Protection of Human Protection of Human SubjectsSubjects

HHS (formerly DHEW) issues HHS (formerly DHEW) issues

Title 45 Code of Federal Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46 (45 CFR Regulations Part 46 (45 CFR 46) 46)

the Basic Policy for the the Basic Policy for the Protection of Human Research Protection of Human Research SubjectsSubjects

Page 27: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Basic ProtectionsBasic Protections

The regulations contain three The regulations contain three basic protections for human basic protections for human subjects:subjects:

Institutional AssurancesInstitutional Assurances IRB ReviewIRB Review Informed ConsentInformed Consent

Page 28: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

An OHRP-Approved An OHRP-Approved AssuranceAssurance Institutions that “engage” in human Institutions that “engage” in human

subjects research conducted or subjects research conducted or supported by HHS must sign a supported by HHS must sign a written Assurance (Federalwide written Assurance (Federalwide Assurance) Assurance)

This documents the institution’s This documents the institution’s commitment to compliance with the commitment to compliance with the Terms of Assurance & HHS Terms of Assurance & HHS regulationsregulations

Page 29: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Institutional Review Institutional Review BoardsBoards Institutional Review Board Institutional Review Board

(IRB):(IRB): A committee charged with A committee charged with the review of human subject the review of human subject research to assure that the research to assure that the subjects’ rights and welfare are subjects’ rights and welfare are adequately protected.adequately protected.

Page 30: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Required IRB ReviewRequired IRB Review

Initial Review & Approval - prior to Initial Review & Approval - prior to the initiation of any research the initiation of any research activity activity

Prior to initiating any changes to Prior to initiating any changes to previously approved research previously approved research

Continuing Review – interval Continuing Review – interval appropriate to degree of risk, but appropriate to degree of risk, but not less than once per year not less than once per year

Page 31: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

Informed Consent Informed Consent

Key principles of obtaining informed Key principles of obtaining informed

consent consent Full disclosure of the nature of the Full disclosure of the nature of the

research and the subject's participationresearch and the subject's participation

Adequate comprehension on part of Adequate comprehension on part of

potential subjects potential subjects

Voluntary participationVoluntary participation

Page 32: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

RememberRemember

Protecting Human Protecting Human Research Subjects Research Subjects

is a is a

Shared ResponsibilityShared Responsibility

Page 33: How the Past Influenced Human Research Protection Regulations

OHRP Contact InformationOHRP Contact Information

Website: www.hhs.gov/ohrp

Regulations, Guidance Documents, Frequently

Asked Questions (FAQs)

Email: [email protected]

Toll-free phone #: 1-866-447-4777

Main phone #: 240-453-6900

Join Listserv:

http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/news/index.html