how much investment can financial markets cope with? a personal perspective financial...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
219 views
TRANSCRIPT
How much investment can financial markets cope with?
A personal perspective Financial correlations:
Why are stocks correlated? [structure/exogenous]Why are correlations time dependent? [dynamics/endogenous]
Impact of investment strategies:portfolio theorya simple dynamical modeldynamic instability of financial marketsfitting real market data
Conclusions
M. Marsili (ICTP) + G. Raffaelli (SISSA)
A personal perspective
External driving or to internal dynamics?
Interacting agents(Caldarelli et al, Lux Marchesi, …)
Minority gamesmarket ~ system close to phase transition(also in other models, e.g. Langevin, Lux, …)
∞ susceptibility
response perturbation
Price taking behavior(the basis of all financial math!)
Traders (perturbation) are negligible (~1/N) with respect to the market
What if =∞
The Market
Example:a minority game experiment
Find the best strategy on historical data of a Minority Game
(virtual) gain = 0.87 Rewind and inject the
strategy in the game The price process
changes a lot (real) gain = -0.0034!
The covariance matrix
T
tii
iii
t kkt ii
t kkiiki
txT
x
tptptx
xtxxtx
xtxxtxC
1
22,
)(1
)1()(log)(
)()(
)()(
t = days
Eigenvalue distributionrandom matrix theoryand SVD(Laloux et al./Gopikrishnan et al. …)
Structure → economic sectors: Minimal Spanning Tree (Mantegna …) data clustering (Giada …)
Facts: There is a non-trivial cluster structure
Facts: Economic networks(Battiston et al., Kogut, …)
Shareholding Board of directors
Does this has an effect on financial correlations?
Board of directors: yesItalian companies (with G. Caldarelli & co)
Rank of ci,j witha link in the boardof directors wrt all ci,j
Key issue: feedback in the financial component
Behavioral: people buy when the market goes up (Airoldi ~ Cont-Bouchaud-Wyart)
Portfolio investment …
ˆˆˆˆˆ CFBC
Preliminaries: portfolio theory Problem: Invest |z with fixed
return = r|z = R and wealth = 1|z = W so as to minimize risk
Solution:
No impact on market. But unique solution. All will invest this way!
WzRrzzzz
z1
2
1minarg
,,
C
A phenomenological model: |x(t+1) = |x(t) + |b + |(t)+[+(t)]|z(t)
|b = bare return |(t) = bare noise E[|(t) (t)|] = B bare correlation +(t) = portfolio investment rate E[(t)2]=
Where
Average return and correlation matrix ( ~ 1/Taverage)
|r(t+1) = (1-) |r(t) + [|x(t)-|x(t-1)] C(t+1) = (1-) C(t) + |x(t)x(t)| |x(t)=|x(t)-|x(t-1)-|r(t)
WzRtrzztztz
z1)()(
2
1minarg)(
,,
C
Note:
Linear impact of investment Impact through |z(t) not |z(t) Many agents |zk(t) with (Rk, k, Dk)
→ one agent |z(t) with (R, , D) Only a single time scale 1/ A simple attempt to a self-consistent problem
ˆˆˆˆˆ CCBC
Phase transition!
market mode parellel to |q (B=BI)
Critical point:
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
W
Fitting real market data Linear model +
Gaussian hypothesis→ compute likelihood (analytical)
Find the parameters which maximize the (log)likelihood
Conclusions
Feedback of portfolio strategies on correlations
There is a limit to how much investment can a market deal with before becoming unstable
Markets close to a phase transition Large response (change in C) to small
investment → “dynamic impact risk”