How do data driven decisions affect student achievement?

Four Basic Questions for Instructional Decision-Making

What do I want my students to know and be able to do?

How will I know they know it and can do it?

How do I account for the students’ performance?

What am I going to do for the students who don’t get it? (...and those who do get it?)

AccountabilitySince we are more accountable today than in the past, how must we proceed?

What must be done with the content we teach and the methods used by teachers?

AccountabilityNew education initiatives and calls for

increased accountability have raised the demands on schools to develop more effective, integrated methods for assessing student achievement.

Districts are now being pressured to align those methods not only within the school system itself, but also with state and district standards, and local curriculum and instructional practices.

Problematic IssuesWhat are some problematic issues associated with district-wide and student-based assessments?

Problematic IssuesRecent waves of new or expanded state-

mandated assessments have added to the already lengthy list of student assessments used by schools. (Many Assessments)

Many schools work diligently integrating a multitude of assessments. They must blend the resulting information into an overall picture of student achievement (Interpreting Results)

Problematic IssuesThe task is a difficult one that calls

for additional time, attention, and energy. (Time Constraints)

The array of available information contributes to the task of effectively analyzing and applying assessment results to decisions about instruction, the curriculum, or educational programs. (Applying the Information Collected)

Common Results

What are some common results that occur after assessments have been completed and the data has been received?

Common ResultsOftentimes, reams of computer-

generated data about student performance may rest untouched on shelves.

Performance data being generated by students, may be logged into teacher grade books with no attempt to find common trends within classrooms or among various student demographic groups.

Assessment as the Centerpiece of ReformMost states have made student

assessment the focus of their school reform and improvement efforts. Consider the following: States have implemented a state student assessment

system. States have implemented assessments that measure

student achievement relative to specified content and performance standards in core subjects such as reading, math, and science.

Barriers to Implementing DDDM

What are some barriers to implementing Data Driven Decision Making?

Barriers to Implementing DDDMNeither teachers nor administrators

routinely receive formal training on how to assess students.

Neither teachers nor administrators routinely receive formal training on how to apply assessment information to instruction.

Barriers to Implementing DDDMSome administrators have difficulty

making sense of reports from state assessments, instead relying heavily on traditional classroom quizzes, tests, and teacher observations for guidance.

Some administrators have teachers discuss student progress in various subject areas according to standardized rubrics, but they have not begun to analyze or use the data to enhance instruction.

Limit assessments to those with a specific purpose and those that contribute to a common “vision” for

student achievement.

Limit AssessmentsEffective school-based student assessments

consist of an organized set of assessment tools that are used for a clearly articulated purpose. (Why are we collecting this data?)

Ensure that time and resources are not wasted by “over-assessing” students or gathering redundant information that does not align with goals for student achievement.

Provide each stakeholder group, with the best information possible to make the decisions they need to make.

Align assessment, standards, curriculum, and instruction

Assessment DevelopmentThird Grade Math Anchors & Related

ContentScope and SequenceBench Mark Assessment Grade 3 Quarter

1Compass ReportsResource DatabaseLaptop Project1st Quarter Results 6th grade

M3.A.1.1 Apply place-value concepts and numeration to counting, ordering, grouping and equivalency.

M3.A.1.1.1 Match the word name with the appropriate whole number (up through 9,999).

M3.A.1.1.2 Differentiate between an even and odd number.

M3.A.1.1.3 Compare two whole numbers using greater than (>), less than (<) or equal to (=) (up through 9,999).

M3.A.1.1.4 Order a set of whole numbers from least to greatest or greatest to least (up through 9,999; limit sets to no more than four numbers).

M3.A.1.1.5 Match a symbolic representation of numbers to appropriate whole numbers (e.g., place value blocks, 7 hundreds, 4 tens and 8 ones, etc).

Align assessment, standards, curriculum, and instruction Alignment here refers to the degree of

match between what students are expected to know and what information is gathered about what they do know (Webb, 1997).

When assessments are aligned with each other, the curriculum, or the standards prescribed by the state or district, there is a sense that they are working together to provide an overall picture of student achievement.

Define the purpose of assessment data.

Why Bother with Assessment DataData leads to a teacher being able to:

Reflect on own practicesGenerate new strategies to reach studentsMake practical educational decisionsMeet the needs of individual student’s learning stylesDetermine and reevaluate previous decisions for

effectivenessUltimately, be a more engaged, effective, productive,

confident, and happy educatorData is only meaningful when it is linked to

decisions about teaching.Data is used to make decisions about

individuals.

How Do We Use the Data?What is the student’s current level?What is the student ready for next?How can I support this?Will I design an activity, have an

interaction, offer a strategy, adapt the environment?

Data is used to make decisions about groups of students.

Planning is essential!

From Where Do I Get the DataInformal Assessments

Teacher observations, conversationsAnecdotal records, portfolios

Formal Standardized TestingTerra Nova results from last year, Screening Assessment

Formal Classroom TestingReading program generated testsTeacher-generated testsRunning Records

Formal and Informal Student Surveys Student Interest SurveysClassroom discussionsLearning ProfilesTeacher-child interviews

Looking at the data helps the teacher with…Small Group Instruction

• Determining groups

• Determining needs

• Determining interests

• Determining support

Using Data to Assign Flexible GroupsAchievement

Use performance on a reading measure. Students with similar scores are placed in the same group.

Mixed AchievementStudents with various scores are placed in the same group.

InterestThis group is based on interest inventories, student interviews, or attitude surveys. Assign students to a group based on interest or topic.

Skill or Instructional NeedStudents lacking in a skill or strategy are grouped together.

Scenario #1• While the students are in centers, Ms. Smith takes an

anecdotal record on William. She notices that William is recognizing the names of some upper and lower case letters and can locate his own name. As she continues to observe, she also notes that William often incorrectly names letters that are easily reversed. She decides to have a group of four students meet so she can review the letters b, d, and p. What type of assessment was used?

What grouping technique did she use?

Informal

Skill or Instructional Need

Scenario #2• While administering the district screening

assessment, Ms. Cappello notices that four of her kindergarten students scored below the benchmark for identifying rhyming words. She decides to bring this group together to play several rhyming games. She thinks out loud for the students, and then encourages them to match pictures of rhyming words.

What type of assessment was used?

What grouping technique did she use?

Formal

Skill or Instructional Need

Scenario #3• In September, Mr. Jones uses the big book Mr.

Grump during a shared reading experience conducted with the whole class. During this time, he notices that some readers seem to need additional instruction to strengthen their concepts about print, especially directionality and voice-print match. He decides to group these students together to provide this instruction

What type of assessment was used?

What grouping technique did she use?

Informal

Skill or Instructional Need

Scenario #4Running records have enabled Mrs. Harris to see that her twenty-two first graders have diverse literacy needs. Six of the students read at the same level. She pulls the group together and selects six copies of a book that is at their instructional reading level as determined by the running records. She facilitates a discussion of the book’s main character. What type of assessment was used?

What grouping technique did she use?

Formal

Achievement

Scenario #5Mr. Doman has taken a close look at the students’ ability to activate background knowledge and monitor comprehension. He observes that they all have a pretty good handle on this, but he wants to introduce a new strategy. He models the strategy for a group of mixed ability students who have indicated an interest in sea-life. He chooses a non-fiction text on sharks. He then asks the students to choose a book from a stack of multi-leveled books on sea-life. The students are then given time to apply the new strategy and read their books. He includes the two students who are in another group and reading at the lowest level in the class. Mr. Doman assists as needed.

What type of assessment was used?

What grouping technique did she use?

Informal

Interest and Mixed Achievement

Scenario #6When Mrs. Anderson was working with her class on the story, “The Olympic Games: Where Heroes are Made,” she noticed some interesting behaviors by four of her students. While most of the class was able to find facts presented in the story, Javier, Julie, Drew, and Robin had difficulty finding facts they were asked to locate. For example, when Mrs. Anderson asked the class how many countries competed in the first modern Olympics, hands flew up, but Javier, Julie, Drew, and Robin kept flipping pages without finding the information. Mrs. Anderson has decided to take these students as a group and model how to locate information in a factual textbook format. What type of assessment was used?

What grouping technique did she use?

Informal

Skill

Scenario #7When reading “Saguaro Cactus,” Mrs. Phillips noticed that Mary read the word “spiny” as “spinny.” When Mrs. Phillips asked what the word meant, Mary explained that it was when things spin really fast. Other students looked confused at Mary’s answer, but Joey and Adele shook their heads in agreement. Mrs. Phillips decided to review all of the vocabulary words for this story with this group. She made a game to help the students review the words, their pronunciation, and their meanings. What type of assessment was used?

What grouping technique did she use?

Informal

Skill

Monitor Student ProgressAssessments that are administered and analyzed more frequently have been shown to be more effective in gauging student progress.

Continuous monitoring of student progress means using data obtained from multiple sources—formal and/or informal—in ways that lead to sound decisions about how to flexibly tailor instruction to meet individual students’ needs.

Identify TrendsSchools committed to measuring the rate of

learning for individual students assess and analyze these data over long periods of time to begin to see trends.

These trends identify which children are learning, falling behind, or ready to move on to more challenging curricula. These trends help teachers individualize their instruction according to the different needs of their students and facilitate flexible groupings within classes based on students’ skills

Conclusion

Assessment is a valuable tool in the education process and is often the first place reformers look to make changes.

High-quality school-based assessments let educators know what students have learned and what they have not, and what is being taught effectively and what needs to be taught better.

No real change can be made without an accurate, definitive picture of where the changes need to be made.