houses vs. earthquakes

12
+ Houses vs. Earthquakes Jasmine Barrow, Eli Moraru, Nadia Bangura, Jericho Desalegn/ Period 1

Upload: hank

Post on 22-Feb-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Houses vs. Earthquakes. Jasmine Barrow, Eli Moraru, Nadia Bangura, Jericho Desalegn/ Period 1. Problem/Purpose. How do different man-made or natural structures react to earthquakes?. Research. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Houses vs. Earthquakes

+

Houses vs. EarthquakesJasmine Barrow, Eli Moraru, Nadia Bangura, Jericho Desalegn/ Period 1

Page 2: Houses vs. Earthquakes

+Problem/Purpose

How do different man-made or natural structures react to earthquakes?

Page 3: Houses vs. Earthquakes

+Research

Research shows that the more flexible a structure is it will with stand an earthquake longer. For example Haiti is building more earthquake resistant buildings with more flexible materials. Over recent years many countries are changing how they make earthquake prone structures so there is less damage done. They also discovered that if you give windows space to shake so it will not break as easily. Scientist discovered that if a structure can sway it will be less likely to fall. The research helped our group make our hypothesis which is that the play-dough will last the longest because it is more flexible than our other materials.

Page 4: Houses vs. Earthquakes

+Hypothesis, Independent Variable, and Dependent Variable

The materials in the experiment are plastic Jell-O cups, cardboard and play-dough. The most flexible material will last the longest based on the research. If we change the materials of the structure then the more flexible which is the play-dough so the play-dough will last the longest. Our hypothesis is that the play-dough will last the longest.

Independent Variable: The materials used to make the structures are the independent variables.

Dependent Variable: The dependent variable is how long the structure will stay standing up.

Page 5: Houses vs. Earthquakes

+Materials

Shake table Cardboard 8 tooth picks 2 empty jello cups Elmer's glue Paper Pen/Pencil

Page 6: Houses vs. Earthquakes

+Procedures

Assemble shake table Collect materials to make structures Create structures Place structure on shake table Shake the shake table Record times Repeat for 3 trials Do same for the other structures

Page 7: Houses vs. Earthquakes

+ Data TableType of Structure

Trail # 1

Trail # 2

Trail # 3

Averages for each Trail

Play dough

1 Shake

19 Shakes

1 Shake

7 Shakes

Card board

1 Shake

4 Shakes

5Shakes

3.33Shakes

Plastic 2 Shakes

3Shakes

2 Shakes

2 Shakes

Page 9: Houses vs. Earthquakes

+ Analysis (Bar graph)

Trail 1 Trail 2 Trail 302468

101214161820

Play-DoughCard boardPlastic

shak

es

Page 10: Houses vs. Earthquakes

+ Analysis

Av-er-

ages

012345678

PlaydoughCardboardPlastic

shakes

AAVERAGES

PLAY-DOUGH

CARD BOARD

JELL-O CUP PLLASSTIC

Page 11: Houses vs. Earthquakes

+Conclusion, Part 1

If we change the materials of the structures, then the more flexible structure will hold up the longest. Our groups hypothesis was supported by the data because it held up the longest with an average of 7 shakes. Some changes we would make to our experiment would be to make the weight of all our structures the same. We would do this because the playdough structure kept on sinking in on the shake table. We would also change the shape of the structures and how they connected. We think if we would’ve made the structures connected better that we would have had different results. Some factors that might have affected our results other than the independent variable could be the weight, the type of materials we used, the shape and how they structures were connected.

Page 12: Houses vs. Earthquakes

+Conclusion Part Two

The results relate to the real world because the results can be helpful in building real earthquake resistant structures. Now that we know that more flexible structures stay up the longest. Builders should use flexible materials in structures.