horizontal diaphragms by bart quimby, p.e., ph.d uaa civil engineering ce 434 - timber design

34
Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Upload: jevon-carpenter

Post on 16-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Horizontal Diaphragms

by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D

UAA Civil Engineering

CE 434 - Timber Design

Page 2: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Lateral Forces

• Lateral forces result from either wind loading or seismic motion.

• In either case, the diaphragms are generally loaded with distributed loads.

• The example here is more closely associated with wind loading.

Page 3: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

The Building

Page 4: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Tributary Areas

Page 5: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Loadings for Roof Diaphragm

• The upper “beam” diagram is for loading in the “2” direction.

• The lower “beam” diagram is for loading in the “1” direction.

• The distributed loads equal the pressure times the tributary height of the exposed area.

• The unit shears equal the “beam” reaction divided by the length of the edge.

Page 6: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Loadings for Floor Diaphragm

• Note that the unit shears at the ends of the diaphragm are the result of the interaction with the shear walls that are providing lateral support for the diaphragm.

• These forces are transferred to the shear walls.

Page 7: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Elements for Direction 1

Page 8: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Idealized Diagram for Dir. 1• Green arrows are unit

shears at edge of roof diaphragm.

• Yellow arrows are unit shears at edge of floor diaphragm.

• Shear in upper part of shear wall is from roof diaphragm only.

• Shear (red arrows )in lower part of shear wall includes both horizontal diaphragms.

Page 9: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Shear Wall Free Body Diagram

Page 10: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Elements for Direction 2

Page 11: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Idealized Diagram for Dir. 2• Green arrows are unit

shears at edge of roof diaphragm.

• Yellow arrows are unit shears at edge of floor diaphragm.

• Shear in upper part of shear wall is from roof diaphragm only.

• Shear (red arrows )in lower part of shear wall includes both horizontal diaphragms.

Page 12: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Shear Wall Free Body Diagram

Page 13: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Another View

Amrhein, James E“Reinforced Masonry Engineering Handbook”, 4th edition

Page 14: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Diaphragms are Beams• Like beams, diaphragms carry loads in bending.• Wood diaphragms are considered to be simply

supported.• This results in both internal bending moment and

shear.• The diaphragm can be considered to be similar to

a wide flange beam where the flanges (diaphragm chords) take all the bending and the web (the plywood sheathing) takes all the shear.

• In diaphragms, the shear force is expressed in terms of “unit shear”.

Page 15: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Beam Behavior of Diaphragms

Amrhein, James E“Reinforced Masonry Engineering Handbook”, 4th edition

Page 16: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Diaphragm Forces in Dir. 1

• Unit shear, v, equals the shear force, V, at a location along the span divided by the depth of the diaphragm at that location.

• Moment is taken by chord forces whose magnitudes equal the Moment at a particular location divided by the diaphragm depth at the same location.

M = w(L2)2/8

C = M / L1

T = M / L1

v = w(L2)/(2L1)

Page 17: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Diaphragm Forces in Dir. 2

• The diaphragm must be analyzed and designed to handle the forces in both principle directions.

v = w(L2)/(2L1)

M C = M / L2T = M / L2

Page 18: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Maximum Diaphragm Ratios2003 IBC

• IBC Table 2305.2.3 (text pg C.42) - Rules of Thumb used to control diaphragm deflections.

• If the span to width ratios are too large, then the diaphragm is not stiff enough to transfer the forces without significant deflection.

• Deflection is a function of beam bending, shear deflection, nail slip in diaphragm and slip in chord connections.

Page 19: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Shear Capacity of Horizontal Wood Diaphragms

2003 IBC• UBC Table 2306.3.1 (pgs C.45-C.47)

– Also see “Special Design Provisions for Wind & Seismic” Table A.4.2A

• Shear capacity depends on the following design variables:

– supporting member species

– plywood grade

– nail size (and penetration)

– plywood thickness (normally selected for vert. loads)

– support widths

– nail spacing

– blocking

– layup

Page 20: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Footnote “a”

• Use of supporting lumber species other than Douglas Fir or Southern Pine– (1) find specific gravity of supporting framing

(see NDS Table 11.3.2A, NDS pg 74)– For Staples: Use Structural I values multiplied

by either 0.82 or 0.65 depending on specific gravity of supporting members.

– For Nails: Use values from table for actual grade of plywood used multiplied by min[(.5+S.G),1]

Page 21: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Footnote “b”

• Field nailing requirement

• Spacing of fasteners along intermediate framing to be 12” O.C. unless supporting member spacing equals 48” or more, then use 6” O.C. nail spacing.

Page 22: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Use With Wind Loads

• IBC-03 2306.3.1 states:

“The allowable shear capacities in Table 2306.3.1 for horizontal wood structural panel diaphragms shall be increased 40

percent for wind design”

Page 23: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Some Definitions

• Nailing:– Boundary nailing: Nailing at all intersections

with shear walls. (parallel to direction of force.)– Edge nailing: nailing along any other

supported plywood edge.– Field nailing: nailing along supports but not at

a plywood edge.

• Layup cases (See IBC Table 2306.3.1)

Page 24: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Nailing Definitions

Page 25: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Chord Design• The chords are axial force

members that generally have full lateral support in both principle directions.

• The top plates of the supporting walls are generally used as the chord members.

• Due to the reversing nature of the loads being resisted, the chord forces are considered to be both tension and compression.

• Design as an axial force member.

Page 26: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Typical Chord

• Roof Chord Member

Page 27: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Example

• Consider the building introduced in the lecture on structural behavior:

We spent some time determining forces in the horizontal and vertical diaphragms (shear walls) in an earlier lecture.

Page 28: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Applied Forces: WindDirection #1Roof = 12,000 # = 200 plf2nd flr = 6,300 # = 105 plf

Direction #2Roof = 5,200 # = 60 plf to 200 plf2nd flr = 4,200 # = 105 plf

Page 29: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Roof Diaphragm: Direction 1

• Parameters:– ½” C-DX plywood – 2x Hem Fir Framing

– Vmax = 150 plf

– Case I layup

• Design nailing for the diaphragm (IBC)– Unblocked, 8d nails

• Vallow = 1.4*240 *(1-(.5-.43))

• Vallow = 313 plf > Vmax

Page 30: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Roof Diaphragm: Direction 2• Parameters:

– ½” C-DX plywood

– 2x Hem Fir Framing

– Vmax = 43.3 plf

– Case 3 layup

• Design nailing for the diaphragm– Unblocked, 8d nails

• Vallow = 1.4*180*(1-(.5-.43))

• Vallow = 234 plf > Vmax

Page 31: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Roof Diaphragm Sheathing Summary

• After determining the needs in each direction the design of the roof can be specified.

• Result:– ½” C-DX plywood– Unblocked– 8d @ 6” O.C. Edge

and Boundary nailing

– 8d @ 12” O.C. Field nailing

Page 32: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Roof Diaphragm Chords: Direction 1

• Moment = 90 ft-k

• Depth = 40 ft

• Chord Force = + 2.25 k

Page 33: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Roof Diaphragm Chords: Direction 2

• Moment = 82.7 ft-k

• Depth = 60 ft

• Chord Force = + 1.38 k

Page 34: Horizontal Diaphragms by Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D UAA Civil Engineering CE 434 - Timber Design

Chord DesignHem Fir #2

• Try (1) 2x4

• Check Tension:– F’t = (525 psi)(1.6)(1.5)

– F’t = 1260 psi

– ft = 2250 # / 5.25 in2

– ft = 429 psi < F’t

• Try (1) 2x4

• Check Compression:– F’c = (1300 psi)(1.6)(1.15)

– F’c = 2392 psi

– fc = 2250 # / 5.25 in2

– fc = 429 psi < F’c

(1) 2x4 is adequate in both directions