Homework: OL 23.1 for Friday

FrontPage: Have your OL on your desk.

Federalism

The “Tug-of-War” between Washington and the states

Understanding Federalism

What is federalism? Why is federalism a good system for the

United States? Is it mentioned in the Constitution?

How was it established?

Examples of types of powers: Expressed (and inherent), implied, denied,

reserved

Two Perspectives

What is the difference between the states’ rights position and the nationalist position with regard to the powers of government?

When it comes to the “tug-of-war” between states and the national government, what names do we give to the “fans” of the 2 “competing sides”?

Monitoring the environment

Does the Constitution mention the environment in any way? Which level of government should retain this

power, then?

Does the federal government involve itself in environmental issues in any way?

How might it justify those actions?

Providing for and overseeing Public Education

Does the Constitution mention this power? Who retains this power, then?

Does the federal government involve itself in education in any way?

How might it justify those actions when necessary?

Determining whether marijuana should be available for medical use?

Does the Constitution mention the regulation of drugs? Which level of government should retain this power?

Does the federal government regulate drugs?

How might it justify this action?

Should states be able to make their own laws with regard to medical marijuana? What might be the negative consequences of allowing this

freedom?

Federalism and Immigration

Recently, the state of Arizona enacted a very controversial immigration law. This law enables police, with reasonable suspicion, to question suspected illegal

immigrants and request proof that they are here legally. Proponents (supporters) of the law argue it is necessary to fight illegal immigration in

Arizona.

Which level of government does the Constitution say has the job of protecting the borders and making immigration policy (state or federal)?

Do you believe that Arizona has acted appropriately in this situation? Why or why not?

What might be the negative consequences if states were able to take action like this?

If you were a Supreme Court Justice hearing this controversy, how would you rule? In favor of the states’ right to make this law, OR That only the federal government has the power to make laws regarding immigration?