holding the gains: a model for sustainability part...

26
Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part II Essential Hospitals Engagement Network October 15, 2014

Upload: others

Post on 03-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part II

Essential Hospitals Engagement NetworkOctober 15, 2014

Page 2: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

2

CHAT FEATURE

The chat tool is available to ask questions or comments at anytime during this event.

Page 3: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

3

RAISE YOUR HAND

• If you wish to speak telephonically, please “raise your hand”. We will call your name, when your phone line is unmuted

Page 4: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

4

ENGAGE AT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

Network with peers, learn how essential hospitals are changing livesNow live at essentialhospitals.org

Page 5: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

5

AGENDA

• Introduction• Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part II

» Lynne Maher, PhD, MBA of Ko Awatea and University of Auckland

• Q & A• Upcoming events

Page 6: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

6

SPEAKERS

Lynne Maher, PhD, MBA

Page 7: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

SustainabilitySession 2- Understanding your

Sustainability Results

Dr. Lynne MaherDirector for Innovation, Ko Awatea

Associate Honorary Professor of Nursing, The University of Auckland

Date: 8th October 2014 Created by: Dr Lynne Maher

@LynneMaher1

Page 8: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

• Provide an overview of the NHS Sustainability Model scoring systems

• Review and discuss your completed bar charts• Start to plan to improve the scores

Plan for this session

Page 9: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

“All models are wrong but some are useful”

W Deming

Page 10: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

How to use the Model

– Designed for use at the beginning and throughout your improvement project

– Designed for use at the level of a specific planned, or ongoing improvement project

– Not designed to assess whether a department with multiple projects, whole organisation or health community is likely to sustain change in general

– Can be used as a ‘diagnostic’ for the project lead

– Is much better if multiple members of the team use it

– The score is useful, the insight and ensuing conversation from the whole team scores is extremely valuable

Page 11: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Before we talk about your charts individually

• How did it feel to go through the Model?– Language

– Understanding the sub-factors

• Were you surprised at any of the individual scores?

• Were you surprised at your overall score?

Other Comments?

Other Questions ?

Page 12: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Overall Scores

• If your overall score is 55 or higher there is reason for optimism

• If your score is between 36 and 54 you have some work to do

• If your score is below 35, we usually advise that you suspend the project and concentrate on improving the likelihood that it will sustain

• For all; work on improving the two factors that have the biggest potential

• Re score in about 6-8 weeks

Page 13: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Down into the detail

• Using your graph

• Identify the two factors which are of greatest concern- where your actual score is a long way from the potential score. These are the areas that will require work.

• Identify the two factors which are the most positive – where your actual score is nearest to the potential score. These are the areas you should celebrate, maintain and learn from.

Page 14: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

The potential for performance improvement

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0Adaptability

ofimprovedprocess

Benefits beyondhelping patients

ClinicalLeadershipengagement

Credibilityof thebenefits

Effectivenessof

systems tomonitor

progress

Fit with the

org'sstrategic aimsand culture

Infrastru-cture

Seniorleadership

engagement

Staff behaviourstowardsustainingchange

Staffinvolvement

&training to

sustain theprocess

potential score

actual score©NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement 2006

weighted score system

Page 15: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Douglas Jones & Team

PI project, decreasing the no show rate for outpatient specialty clinics.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Benefits beyond helping patients

Credibility of the evidence

Adaptability of improved

process

Effectiveness of the system

to monitor progress

Staff involvement and training

to sustain the process

Staff behaviours

toward sustaining the

change

Senior leadership

engagement

Clinical leadership

engagement

Fit with the organisation's strategic aims

and culture

Infrastructure for

sustainability

4.7

6.15.2

4.9

6.3

5.1

10.4

15.0

3.4

6.4

Overall score- 67.5

Page 16: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Debra Burgess, RN, BSN, MHAQuality & Safety Nurse, UCDHS

Overall Score – 50.7

Page 17: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Thomas Holton & San Francisco Team HAPU

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Benefits beyond helping patients

Credibility of the evidence

Adaptability of improved

process

Effectiveness of the system

to monitor progress

Staff involvement and training

to sustain the process

Staff behaviours

toward sustaining the

change

Senior leadership

engagement

Clinical leadership

engagement

Fit with the organisation's strategic aims

and culture

Infrastructure for

sustainability

4.9

7.9

3.1

4.5 5.0

6.7 7.1

12.3

4.55.0

Overall score-61.0

Page 18: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Renee Kearby & Team IMMU

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Benefits beyond helping patients

Credibility of the evidence

Adaptability of improved

process

Effectiveness of the system

to monitor progress

Staff involvement and training

to sustain the process

Staff behaviours

toward sustaining the

change

Senior leadership

engagement

Clinical leadership

engagement

Fit with the organisation's strategic aims

and culture

Infrastructure for

sustainability

4.0

6.3

3.4

6.5 4.9

0.0

6.25.5

7.0

3.3

Overall score- 47.1

Page 19: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

• Share your graph sheets.• Explore who has a high score for a factor that you have a low

score?• Make a time to meet and chat about what they have done to

achieve that score. • Share with them any areas of your good practice too• Review the material in the Sustainability Guide• Plan to improve two areas where you have the highest

potential for improvement

Learning from each other

Page 20: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

What did you learn and what are you going to do?

Sustainability Factor Factor score Learning from colleagues /other sources

How will I use the learning?

Page 21: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Questions/ Comments?

Page 22: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

22

UPCOMING EVENTS

• WebinarsREAL eLearning ModuleNov 18 | 1 pm EST

Maternal HealthNov 20 | 2pm EST

Leadership for Safety – Responding to Patient Safety DisastersDec 4 | 12pm EST

• In Person Event:Summit on Harm Reduction - Sustaining Progress, Building on Success Nov 10 | Chicago

Page 23: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

23

THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING

• Evaluation: When you close out of WebEx following the webinar, an evaluation will open in your browser. Please take a moment to complete. We greatly appreciate your feedback!

• Check out the new EHEN Leadership for Safety Program website: http://essentialhospitals.org/institute/ehen-leadership-safety-program/

Visit http://essentialhospitals.org/groups/ehen/ to collaborate today.

Page 24: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Sustainability:recommended reading

• Berwick D (1989) Continuous Improvement as an Ideal in Health Care. New England Journal of Medicine. 320: 53-6

• Bridges W (2003) Managing Transitions: Making the Most of Change. London. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

• Buchanan D. Ketley D, Gollop R, Jones JL, Lamont SS, Sharpe A, Whitby E. (2002) No Going Back: a review of the literature on sustaining strategic change. NHS Modernisation Agency.

• Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Macfarlane F, Peacock R. (2004) How to spread good ideas. A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation. NHS Service Delivery Organisation. London

• Kotter J (1995) Leading Change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review.

Page 25: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Sustainability-recommended reading• Ovretveit J, Bate P, Cleary P, Cretin S, Gustafsen D, McInnes K, McLeod H,

Molfenter T, Plsek P, Robert G, Shortell S, Wilson T (2002) Quality Collaboratives: lessons from research. Quality and Safety in Health Care; 11:345-351.

• Ovretveit J (2003) Making Temporary Quality Improvements continuous: a review of the research relevant to the sustainability of quality improvement in health care. Second Report of the ‘Improving Improvement Action Evaluation Project’. Unpublished.

• Oxtoby B, McGuiness T, Morgan R. (2002) Developing Organisational Change Capability. European Management Journal Vol 20, No 3. pp 310-320

• Langley G, Nolan K, Nolan T, Norman C, Provost L. (1996) The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organisational Performance.Jossey Bass. San Francisco.

• Maher L, Penny J (2004) Service Improvement in Peck E (ed) Organisational Development in Healthcare: approaches, innovations, achievements. Oxon. Radcliffe.

Page 26: Holding the Gains: A Model for Sustainability Part IIessentialhospitals.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/...A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability

Sustainability-recommended reading• Paton R A McCalman J (2000) Change Management: A Guide to

effective Implementation. London. Sage• Plsek P, Greenhalgh T. (2001) The Challenge of Complexity in

Health care BMJ: 323 625-62• Plsek P, Wilson T. (2001) Complexity, Leadership and

Management in healthcare Organisations. BMJ. 323: 746-749• Research into Practice (2002) From Scepticism to support- what

are the influencing factors? • Stacey R. (2001) Complex Responsive Processes in

Organisations: Learning and Knowledge Creation. London. Routledge.

• Strubel P (1996). Why do employees resist change? Harvard Business Review. 71:95-101