hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

39
http://mediaeducationlab.com/ copyright

Upload: renee-hobbs

Post on 06-May-2015

836 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

http://mediaeducationlab.com/copyright

Page 2: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

Critical Thinking, Reflection & EthicsCritical Thinking,

Reflection & EthicsUsing Technology

Tools WellUsing Technology

Tools Well

Self-Expression & Creativity

Self-Expression & Creativity

Teamwork & CollaborationTeamwork & Collaboration

Media Literacy

Critical thinking about media & technology+

Composing using media & technology

For what purpose? To build critical thinking and communication

skills

Media Literacy

Critical thinking about media & technology+

Composing using media & technology

For what purpose? To build critical thinking and communication

skills

Page 3: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity
Page 4: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity
Page 5: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

To promote creativity, innovation and the spread of knowledge

Article 1 Section 8U.S. Constitution

Page 6: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

Use and share

Copy

Modify & Repurpose

Excerpt & Quote From

Distribute

Page 7: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

Restrict

Limit

Charge high fees

Discourage use

Use scare tactics

Page 8: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

See no Evil Close the Door Hyper-Comply

Page 9: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

NEGOTIATED AGREEMENTS BETWEEN MEDIA COMPANIES AND EDUCATIONAL GROUPS

Agreement on Guidelines for Classroom Copying in Not-for-Profit Educational Institutions

Fair Use Guidelines for Educational Multimedia

Guidelines for the Educational Use of Music

Educational Use Guidelines are Confusing!

Page 10: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

The documents created by these negotiated agreements give them “the appearance of positive law. These qualities are merely illusory, and consequently the guidelines have had a seriously detrimental effect. They interfere with an actual understanding of the law and erode confidence in the law as created by Congress and the courts”

--Kenneth Crews, 2001

Page 11: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

withaccurate knowledge

Page 12: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

EVERYTHING IS COPYRIGHTED

…BUT THERE ARE EXEMPTIONS

Page 13: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

--Section 107Copyright Act of 1976

For purposes such as criticism, comment,

news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use),

scholarship or research

For purposes such as criticism, comment,

news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use),

scholarship or research

Page 14: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

“It not only allows but encourages socially beneficial uses of copyrighted works such as teaching, learning, and scholarship. Without fair use, those beneficial uses— quoting from copyrighted works, providing multiple copies to students in class, creating new knowledge based on previously published knowledge—would be infringements. Fair use is the means for assuring a robust and vigorous exchange of copyrighted information.”

--Carrie Russell, American Library Association

Page 15: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity
Page 16: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

Bill Graham Archives vs. Dorling Kindersley, Ltd. (2006)

Page 17: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

An Example of Transformative Use

The purpose of the original: To generate publicity for a concert.

The purpose of the new work: To document and illustrate the concert events in historical context.

Page 18: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

1. Did the unlicensed use “transform” the material taken from the copyrighted work by using it for a different purpose than that of the original, or did it just repeat the work for the same intent and value as the original?

2. Was the material taken appropriate in kind and amount, considering the nature of the copyrighted work and of the use?

Page 19: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity
Page 20: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity
Page 21: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity
Page 22: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity
Page 23: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

Educators can:

1. make copies of newspaper articles, TV shows, and other copyrighted works and use them and keep them for educational use

2. create curriculum materials and scholarship with copyrighted materials embedded

3. share, sell and distribute curriculum materials with copyrighted materials embedded

Learners can:

4. use copyrighted works in creating new material

5. distribute their works digitally if they meet the transformativeness standard

Page 24: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

Organizations Supporting the Code of Best Practices

Action Coalition for Media Education (ACME)

National Association for Media Literacy Education (NAMLE)

National Council of Teachers Of English (NCTE)

Visual Studies DivisionInternational Communication

Association (ICA)

Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL)

Page 25: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) has adopted the “Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Media Literacy Education” as its official policy on fair use

Page 26: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

Elementary School Case Study: P.S. 124 The Silas B. Dutcher SchoolBrooklyn, NY

High School Case Study: Upper Merion Area High School King of Prussia, PA

College Case Study: Project Look Sharp at Ithaca CollegeIthaca, NY

Page 27: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity
Page 28: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

The Code of Best Practices Helps

• To educate educators themselves about how fair use applies to their work

• To persuade gatekeepers, including school leaders, librarians, and publishers, to accept well-founded assertions of fair use

• To promote revisions to school policies regarding the use of copyrighted materials that are used in education

• To discourage copyright owners from threatening or bringing lawsuits

• In the unlikely event that such suits were brought, to provide the defendant with a basis on which to show that her or his uses were both objectively reasonable and undertaken in good faith.

Page 29: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

Communities of Practice Assert Their Fair Use Rights

Page 30: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

1.RIPPING. Criminalizes the use of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent digital rights management (DRM) software that controls access to copyrighted works. 2.ONLINE TAKEDOWNS. Protects Internet Service Providers against copyright liability if they promptly block access to allegedly infringing material (or remove such material from their systems) if notified by copyright holder; offers a counter-notification provision if use is exempted under fair use

Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998

Page 31: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity
Page 32: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

The Results of our Advocacy

Users may unlock DVDs protected by the Content Scrambling System when circumvention is for the purpose of criticism or comment using short sections, for educational, documentary or non-profit use.

Page 33: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

SHARE THE GOOD NEWS! SHARE THE GOOD NEWS!

Page 34: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

http://mediaeducationlab.com

Page 35: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity
Page 36: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

Copyright? What’s Copyright?

Users’ Rights, Section 107

Page 37: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

Flexible Licensing Schemes:

Some Rights Reserved

Creative Communities

Develop Codes of Best Practices for

Fair Use

Open Source Business Models Make Copyright

Obsolete

Page 38: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity
Page 39: Hobbs namle 2011 copyright clarity

Contact:

Renee HobbsTemple UniversityMedia Education LabPhiladelphia PA

Email: [email protected]: (215) 204-3255Twitter: reneehobbsWeb: http://mediaeducationlab.com