hoap joint audit review of procurement tanzania 9th june 2006
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: HOAP Joint Audit Review of Procurement Tanzania 9th June 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071705/56649f565503460f94c7ab82/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
HOAP Joint Audit
Review of Procurement
Tanzania 9th June 2006
![Page 2: HOAP Joint Audit Review of Procurement Tanzania 9th June 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071705/56649f565503460f94c7ab82/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
BACKGROUND
• Importance of procurement
• 3 Ministries• NAO• Donors• Donor Working
Groups• PCB• PPRA• PCA• GGCU
![Page 3: HOAP Joint Audit Review of Procurement Tanzania 9th June 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071705/56649f565503460f94c7ab82/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
FRAMEWORK, INSTITUTIONS & CAPACITY
• Donor action has resulted in an improved framework
• Reforms represent clear improvement
• Lack of capacity has prevented full potential from being realised
![Page 4: HOAP Joint Audit Review of Procurement Tanzania 9th June 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071705/56649f565503460f94c7ab82/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
COMPLIANCE (1 of 2)
• Regulatory Authority and Appeals Authority created, but yet to exercise their statutory powers
• Compliance with key provisions of new procurement legislation in ministries visited appears strong
• Clear enthusiasm to comply with new legislation• Overall compliance picture is unclear• NAO recognition that procurement deserves particular
attention• PAF indicator specifically examining compliance reflects
the subject's importance
![Page 5: HOAP Joint Audit Review of Procurement Tanzania 9th June 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071705/56649f565503460f94c7ab82/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
COMPLIANCE (2 of 2)
Recommendations:
• Clarify boundaries between responsibilities of NAO and PPRA (and MoF)
• Assess work performed by the external auditors
![Page 6: HOAP Joint Audit Review of Procurement Tanzania 9th June 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071705/56649f565503460f94c7ab82/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
VALUE FOR MONEY (1 of 2)
• NAO has recently commenced detailed VFM work, although it is yet to perform any specific procurement-related VFM work
• No donor-monitored indicator concerning VFM (PEFAR recommendation that a means of measuring and enhancing VFM performance should be developed)
![Page 7: HOAP Joint Audit Review of Procurement Tanzania 9th June 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071705/56649f565503460f94c7ab82/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
VALUE FOR MONEY (2 of 2)
Recommendations
• Indicator measure progress in VFM
• Update the $300m figure
• Perception indicators in corruption
![Page 8: HOAP Joint Audit Review of Procurement Tanzania 9th June 2006](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071705/56649f565503460f94c7ab82/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
OVERALL PICTURE
• "Tremendous Progress" yet lower grade awarded in PEFAR assessment
• High level of cooperation among donors• Highly process-orientated
Recommendations:• Improve consistency between and amongst tools
used for measurement and capacity-building.• Accommodate economy, efficiency and
effectiveness considerations