higher school of economics, moscow, 2011 logics of justification for state regulation in russia (a...
TRANSCRIPT
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011
www.hse.ru
Logics of Justification for State Regulationin Russia (A Case of the Trade Law)
Maxim Markin
Laboratory for Studies in Economic SociologyHigher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
11 Annual Aleksanteri Conference“The Dragon and the Bear: Strategic Choices of China and Russia”
11 November 2011
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011
Process of Passing the Trade Law
Until 2006: the relationships of retailers and their suppliers had been taking place without any state interference
The end of 2006: public discussions about the necessity of the state regulation of Russian retail industry began
The middle of 2008: the idea of passing the trade law was put to the back burner
The beginning of 2009: the introduction of the trade law became an agenda item again
The middle of 2009: the process of passing the trade law started
The end of 2009: the trade law was passed
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011
Research Problem
Until 2006 retailers and their suppliers had been solving the problem of coordination without any state interference
After 2006 the process became public and in 2009 the trade law was passed
But the problem was not solved
It is quite difficult to understand why the market actors who really wanted to come to an agreement could not do it
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011
Main Hypothesis
While justifying their opinions business partners used different logics of justification and it was an obstacle for them to come to an agreement
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011
Theoretical Basis
Market Industrial Civic
Mode of evaluation
(worth)Price Productivity efficiency Collective interest
Format of relevant
informationMonetary
Measurable criteria,
statisticsFormal, official
Elementary relation Exchange Functional link Solidarity
Human qualificationDesire, purchasing
power
Professional
competency and
expertise
Equality
Worlds of justification(L. Boltanski, L. Thevenot)
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011
Logics of Justification for State Regulation
Market Industrial Civic
What is important? Competition Stability Equality
Who are
market actors?Competitors Business Partners Citizens
What do support?
and
What is supported?
Competition –
Effective companies
Stability –
Investments
Equality –
Solidarity
What do develop
the economy?Effective Companies Investments Solidarity
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011
Methodology
The empirical data which include:
1. Mass Media publications (71 articles in 15 the most popular Russian journals, magazines and newspapers)
2. Transcripts of the discussions in the Russian Parliament (the first reading, the second reading and the final reading)
3. Seven interviews with market actors
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011
Logics of Justification for State Regulation of the Trade Industry in Russia (1)
Market Industrial Civic
Aim 1to defend the
competition
to defend the
competitors
to defend the
consumers
Example of Arguments
It is necessary to defend
the market mechanism
of price making
It is necessary to defend
small Russian
agricultural producers
It is necessary to defend
poor Russian consumers
Aim 2to ensure the normal
functioning of markets
to ensure the stable
functioning of
enterprises
to ensure the equal
rights of market actors
Example of ArgumentsIt is necessary to ensure
the make-out of retailing
It is necessary to ensure
the investments in
innovations by
enterprises
It is necessary to settle
the conflict between
retailers and their
suppliers
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011
Logics of Justification for State Regulation of the Trade Industry in Russia (2)
Market Industrial Civic
Aim 3 - -to ensure the food
security of the country
Example of
Arguments- -
It is necessary to
decrease the
dependence on the food
import in Russia
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011
Logic of Justification for State Regulation of Market Actors
Retailers were against the trade law and they justified their opinion basing on the market logic
Suppliers being the main opponents to retailers supported the trade law and they justified their opinion basing on the industrial logic
The state had the most sophisticated opinion because different ministries and departments used arguments basing on different combinations of civic and other logics
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011
Conclusion
The problem of coordination in Russian retail industry has appeared because retailers and their suppliers could not come to an agreement about some details in their relationships
They started to justify their opinions about the enactment of the trade law
The winners based on the sophisticated combination of the industrial logic and the civic logic
Thank you for your attention!