high throughput protein, protein-protein interaction, c.ymcdn.com/sites/ · pdf filehigh...
TRANSCRIPT
High Throughput Protein, Protein-Protein Interaction, and Metabolite Assays CE
Claire Ouimet, Jing Nie, Erik Guetschow,
Shuwen Sun & Shi Jin
Collaborators: David Lombard, Jason Gestwicki
High-speed Electrophoresis
Jacobson. Anal Chem 1998, 70, 3476 Moore. Anal Chem 1993, 65, 3550
Tao. Anal Chem 1998, 70, 4015
-High E
-Short Distance
-Control Joule Heat (dimensions,
conductivity)
-Narrow injection
-Sensitive detection
Applications of Fast Electrophoresis
• Western blot
• High Throughput
Screening
• Non-covalent
interactions
• “Sensing”
• 2-D Separations
8 10 12 14 16 180
1
2
3
4
Time (s)
*
* UNC Ramsey Group Website
Western Blotting: Most Used Affinity Separation
Affinity and size information
Ubiquitous (> 50,000 citations)
Reliable
- Slow, manual operation
- Difficult for multiple proteins
- Lack of Chip or CE equivalent
Towbin, H., et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1979, 76 (9), 4350-4354.
Burnette, W. N., Anal. Biochem. 1981, 112 (2), 195-203.
http://www.cellsignal.com/products/9946.html
Traditional Western Blot WorkflowSeparate SDS-protein
complexes (~1-3 hours)
Target proteins
Antibody
specific
for target
Target proteins
Blocking proteins
Block (30 min)Detection
Immunoreaction
(hours)
Membrane
Blot (30-60 min)
Gel Filter
paper
Recent Micro Western Developments
O'Neill, R. A, et al. PNAS. 2006, 103 (44), 16153-16158.
Photo X-link
Electrode array
Hughs, A. J.; Herr, A. E. PNAS, 2012, 109, 21450–21455
Fast Sieving Separations Possible in Chips with Entangled Polymer Media
Bousse, L., Mouradian, S., Minalla, A., Yee, H., Williams,
K., Dubrow, R., Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 1207–1212.
Chip Based Western Blot Separation field: 460 V/cm
Separation time: 2 min
Necessary to maintain
stable current
Contains MeOH:
Promote
adsorption
70
100
130
160
Gra
y V
alu
e
30 s
4 mm
Resolution of ERK1/2 (42/44kDa) from Cell Lysate on Membrane
On-column
In sheath
On membrane
Analysis of Multiple Proteins: “Stripping Analysis” in Conventional
Western• After 1st Westernremove antibody
• Apply 2nd Antibody
• Limited because of protein loss and time
www.piercenet.com
Multiple Separation Tracks on One Membrane (processed in parallel)
-Use repeated injection
from 1 sample: multi-
protein analysis
-Inject and deposit from
multiple samples
-Process all
immunoassays at 1 time
MEK1/2
Inj 1 Inj 2
ERK1/2
Inj 1 Inj 2
P-STAT3 STAT3
Inj 1 Inj 1
P-ERK1/2Inj 1 Inj 2
5 mm
11 kDa
21 kDa
32 kDa
40 kDa
65 kDa
9 proteins, n = 2800 nL sample
B-tubulin P-akt Akt P-MEK1/2
Inj 1 Inj 2 Inj 1 Inj 2 Inj 1 Inj 2Inj 1
11 kDa
21 kDa
32 kDa
40 kDa
65 kDa
Multiplexed Assay
Microfluidic Western Blot Summary:High Throughput, High Content
Ladder
Egg white
INS-1
10 kDa
40 kDa65 kDa
Ladder Lysozyme AMPK
Sloan-Kettering Institute, www.mskcc.org
High Throughput Screening (HTS)
• 100,000 to 2,000,000 candidates for one target
• High density well plates / Robots / Optical Readout
Problems:
-Assay development
-False Signals
-Reagent use:
Cost: $50k/screen
(50 mL7.5 L for 150,000 samples)
Difficult to express targets
Electrophoresis for Screening: Fast Assays
• -Enzyme Assays
• -GPCR activation
(Anal Chem, 2007,
79:1158)
• -Protein-Protein Interaction
(Anal Chem 2013,
85:9824)
*LRRASLG *LRRApSLGPKA
ATP
Fast Sample Introduction: Caliper High Throughput “Sipper Chip”
• Reads 384 Well Plate in 80 minutes
• Vacuum flow through channel is compromise
R R R R RR R R R R
S S S S S S S S S S
P P P P P
PP P P
P
Compound A5 Compound A6
Droplet MCE Screen: Sirt5 against Prestwick Library
• 384 samples
• 7 injections each
• 12 min
Comparison to LabChip SystemCaliper LabChip (1 sample x 1 injection)
Droplet-CE (75 samples x 8 replicates = 600 injections)
DyeProduct Substrate
Miniaturization of Screening
Assays in 96, 384, and 1536 well plates
Higher density have lower volume and use less reagent (saves costs for large scale screens)
Going smaller than 1536 (1 uL) is difficult: evaporation, liquid handling
Protein Protein Interaction as Drug Targets
Long believed to be
“undruggable”
Large number of
emerging targets
Small molecule
modulators
identified recently
• Protein–Protein Interactions as New Drug Targets, Enno Klussmann, John Scott,
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
• Aloy P, Russell RB, FEBS Lett. 2005 Mar 21;579(8):1854-8.
Part of human interactome
Protein-Protein Interaction Assays and Screens
• Surface Plasmon Resonance
• FRET
• Fluorescence Polarization
• Isothermal Calorimetry
• Bead & surface binding assays
Ideal: Fast, low sample consumption, label free,
easy to adapt to new proteins, multi-protein
complexes
Free* Complex
Affinity Probe CE(Noncompetitive Affinity Assay)
time
Antibody-Antigen
Aptamer-target
Protein-peptide
Ligand-receptor
DNA-protein
Drug-apoenzyme
Chaperone Protein-Protein Interactions
Hsp70-Bag
Hsp90 dimer
HOP
Hsp90 dimer
Hsp70
substrate
• Chaperone
interactions modulate
client protein binding
• Proteostasis
• Cancer/Protein
folding diseases
M. P. Mayer and B. Bukau, CMLS, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. Vol. 62, 2005
Current Standard Screen: Flow Cytometry Protein Interaction Assay
Hsp70
Bag3
Biotinylated Hsp70
Streptavidin/Biotin linkage
AF488 label
Bead Associated
Fluorescence
Measured by
Flow Cytometer
David L. Roman, et al, Mol Pharmacol 71:169–175, 2007
Streptavidin
Bead
Comparison of CE and Bead Assay
3,443 Compounds
Screened at 20 mM
118 Hits (3.4%)
69% confirmed 50% confirmed
100% reconfirm on FPCIA 50% reconfirm on CE
BeadCE
48 Hits (1.4%)
Dose-Response
Curve
Cross Platform
Test
Initial Screen
Conclusion: CE is More Selective
Why is CE More Selective?
Polymer
Bead Hsp70
Bag3
AF488 label
Bead Assay
CE Assay
Hsp70
Bag3
Hsp70
0 1 2 3
0
200
400
Time (min)
0
2
4
6
RF
U
0
30
60
Complex
Free
Calcein
Protein signal
gone
particles
Free
Complex
Fluorescent
compound
Aggregation
agent
Normal
compound
Hsp70
0 1 2 30
50
100
time (min)
RF
U
+ Bag3- Bag3
free Hsp70
?
Challenges for PPI Analysis by CE
Complex dissociation
Rauch, J.N., et al., Anal. Chem. 2013.
dissociationbridge
free
complex
30time (min)
RFU
Simultaneous: separations and interactions
Adsorption to Capillary
0 5 10
0
200
400
time (min)
RF
U
free
complex
free
complex
Protein Cross-linking Capillary Electrophoresis (PXCE)
quench
and
denature
+
gel electrophoresis
Protein Cross-linking CE
Chen, X. et al, J. Chromatogr. B. 2009.
RF
U
time (s) 480
400
mAb monomer
dimer
Therapeutic mAb
aggregation
0 5 100
150
300
time (min)
RF
U
free
Hsp70Hsp70-Bag3
6 8 10
0
9
18
time (min)
RF
U
free
Hsp90Hsp90
dimer
0 2 40
1000
2000
time (min)
RF
U
free
lysozyme
lysozyme-mab
6 9 120
5
10
time (min)
RF
U
free Hsp90
Hsp90
dimer2Hsp90-
FKBP52
Complexes Analyzed by PXCE
Bag
Hsp70
Effect of Hsp70-Bag3 Binding Site Mutants Detected by PXCE
Sondermann, H., et al. Science. 2001.
-10 -8 -6 -4
0
50
100
log(Hsp70 conc.)
perc
en
t in
hib
itio
n (
%)
WT
Hsp70 R,R 258,262, A,AHsp70 E,D 283,292 A,A
-9.0 -8.0 -7.0 -6.0 -5.0-9.0
-8.0
-7.0
-6.0
-5.0
log(Ki) by FCPIA
lo
g(K
i) b
y P
XC
E
Wild-Type
E,D 283,292 A,A
R,R 258,262 A,A
-10 -8 -6 -4
0
50
100
log(Hsp70 conc.)
perc
en
t in
hib
itio
n (
%)
WT
Hsp70 R,R 258,262, A,AHsp70 E,D 283,292 A,A
-9.0 -8.0 -7.0 -6.0 -5.0-9.0
-8.0
-7.0
-6.0
-5.0
log(Ki) by FCPIA
lo
g(K
i) b
y P
XC
E
Wild-Type
E,D 283,292 A,A
R,R 258,262 A,A
Competitive Inhibition by PXCE: Hsp70-Bag3 mutants
Quantification of Small Molecule Inhibition by PXCE
-10 -8 -6 -4
0
50
100
log(compound)
perc
en
t in
hib
itio
n (
%)
JG-231JG-98JG-311
JG-3
11
JG-9
8
JG-2
314
5
6
7
8
-lo
g(I
C50)
PXCE
FCPIA
Fast CE for “Sensing”
Fast CE
Aliquot Processing
Sampling Probe
Sample: Rxn, In vivo, Tissue
Time Resolved
Chemical
Information
“Sensing” Metabolites in the Living Brain:Identify chemical signals in behavior, learning, pharmacology,
pathophysiology
Rapid chemical changes Spatially heterogeneous
Delicate tissue
>100 neurotransmitters+ metabolites
Freely moving animals
Challenges:
aCSF
Pump Fractions
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
20151050
Microdialysis Sampling for In Vivo Monitoring
Microdialysis Probe
Sample transfer
tubing
-Highly Versatile but…
-Low Temporal Resolution
when coupled to HPLC
because of large sample
requirements (10 min)
aCSF
4 cm
PDMS Headpiece
Volume ~2 nL
On-line analysis
Pump
Collection Tubing
Off-line Analysis
Droplet Fraction Collection
MS
Enzyme
CE
MS
Enzyme
CE
-collect seconds (nL) fractions
-analyze on-line or off-line
-minimal distortion due to flow
-CE compatible
On-Board Droplet Generator for Awake Animal Experiments with Reagent Addition
Dialysis
Probe
Droplet
Generator
0.36
0.32
0.28
0.24
0.20
0.16
0.12
RF
U6005004003002001000
Relative Time (s)
100 s*
Monitoring by Fast CE
0.24
0.20
0.16
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.00
RF
U
50403020100Migration Time (s)
Electrophoresis Trace
* Time of analysis, in vivo time = 20 s
Applications
Effect of drugs on the brain
Changes in transmitters
with diseases
Changes in transmitters
with behavior
Changes in transmitters
with learning and memory
Huntington’s Disease
“CAG Repeat” disease
Neurodegenerative
Cognitive and motor
impairment
Death within 15 years
~30k cases in USA
Little treatment available
Recovery of Normal Glu Uptake in HD Mice with Cef
40
100
160
220
Perc
en
t Basal (
Glu
)
Series1
Series2
Series3
WT HD HD + Cef
80 s
Summary
Fast, Multiplexed Western
Droplet samples for high throughput
Nanoliter lab
PPI by CE gives high selectivity
PXCE for troublesome proteins
Fast CE for “sensing” in complex
environments
Acknowledgements