high incidence of recurrence and hematologic events following liver transplantation for...
TRANSCRIPT
High incidence of recurrence andhematologic events following livertransplantation for Budd–Chiari syndrome
Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS) is characterized byhepatic venous outflow obstruction involving thehepatic vein, inferior vena cava (IVC) or both. Thepresentation of BCS may be acute or chronic,typically associated with signs and symptoms ofportal hypertension (1). Hepatic congestion result-ing from outflow obstruction leads to hepaticnecrosis and ischemic injury, with progressivecentrilobular fibrosis and eventual cirrhosis (1).Most cases of BCS in the Western hemisphere areassociated with underlying myeloproliferative dis-ease (MPD) or other hematologic disorders with
inherent thrombogenic propensity (1–5). Treatmentof BCS consists of medical and surgical interven-tions (1–3). Medical management includes treatingthe underlying hematologic disorder, anticoagula-tion and the use of diuretics for control of ascites(1, 5, 6). Percutaneous balloon angioplasty, stentingand thrombolytic therapy may be beneficial inselected cases with acute presentation (1, 7, 8).Porto-systemic shunting converts the portal veininto an outflow tract for the liver, thus relievinghepatic congestion and necrosis (2, 9). Recently,transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
Cruz E, Ascher NL, Roberts JP, Bass NM, Yao FY. High incidence ofrecurrence and hematologic events following liver transplantation forBudd–Chiari syndrome.Clin Transplant 2005: 19: 501–506. ª Blackwell Munksgaard, 2005
Abstract: Background: Most cases of Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS) inWestern countries are related to underlying hematologic diseases withinherent thrombogenic propensity. We evaluated the long-term outcome,risks for recurrent disease, and other hematologic complications followingorthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for BCS.Methods: Clinical data from 11 consecutive patients with BCS whounderwent OLT were retrospectively reviewed. Four patients had a priortransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and one had a surgical shuntprocedure. All patients were started on intravenous heparin within the first24 h following OLT. All except one patient who had protein C deficiencywere maintained on long-term oral anticoagulation.Results: The Kaplan–Meier survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 yr were 81, 65and 65%, respectively. Three patients developed BCS recurrence, inclu-ding two who died as a consequence of rapid graft failure within daysafter OLT. Three patients developed other thrombotic events, includingsplenic vein thrombosis associated with gastric variceal hemorrhagerequiring splenectomy, portal vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.Four patients experienced severe bleeding complications within 7 d afterOLT requiring exploratory laparotomy. One patient died after transfor-mation of polycythemia vera to acute myelogenous leukemia at 2.1 yrafter OLT.Conclusion: We observed a high incidence of recurrent BCS and compli-cations related to the underlying hematologic disorder or anticoagulationafter OLT for BCS. The present series also included the first two cases ofrapid recurrence of BCS and graft failure within days after OLT.
Elizabeth Cruza, Nancy L Ascherb,John P Robertsb, Nathan M Bassa
and Francis Y Yaoa,b
a Division of Gastroenterology, Department of
Medicine, and b Division of Transplantation,
Department of Surgery, University of California,
San Francisco, CA, USA
Key words: bleeding complications –
Budd–Chiari syndrome – orthotopic liver
transplantation – recurrence – thrombosis
Corresponding author: Francis Y. Yao, M.D.,
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of
Medicine, University of California, San Francisco,
Box 0538, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room S-357,
San Francisco, CA 94143-0538, USA.
Tel.: +1 415 514 0332; fax: +1 415 476 0659;
e-mail: [email protected]
Accepted for publication 17 March 2005
Clin Transplant 2005: 19: 501–506 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00374.xCopyright ª Blackwell Munksgaard 2005
501
(TIPS) has also been shown to be an effectivealternative therapy among patients with BCSrefractory to medical therapy (10, 11).BCS accounts for about 1% of all indications for
orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in theUnited States (12) and in Europe (13). The usualcriteria for OLT for patients with BCS includefulminant disease presentation, advanced fibrosisor cirrhosis by liver biopsy and deterioration ofliver function despite medical or surgical interven-tions (1–3). While satisfactory patient survivalfollowing OLT for BCS has been reported (13–21), information on the risks for recurrent BCS andother hematologic complications after OLT is stilllimited.In the present study, we reviewed the results of
OLT in 11 consecutive patients with BCS andcompared the outcome with other published data.We focussed on hematologic complications follow-ing OLT, including recurrent BCS, otherthrombotic events, bleeding associated with anti-coagulation and hematologic malignancies.
Patients and methods
Among 1162 adult patients over the age of 18 yrwho underwent OLT at the University of Califor-nia San Francisco between January 1988 andJanuary 2002, 11 patients (1%) had BCS as theprimary indication for OLT. Clinical data of these
patients were collected retrospectively from acomputerized database and by review of theirmedical charts.
The individual baseline clinical characteristicsare presented in Table 1. To summarize, there werenine females and two males with a median age of48 yr (range 27–62 yr). Polycythemia vera (PCV)was the most common underlying hematologicdisorder, found in six patients (55%). One patienthad protein C deficiency. The type of MPD couldnot be specified in two patients. The remaining twopatients had no known underlying hematologicdiagnosis. Three of the patients with PCV also hada history of oral contraceptive use.
The interval from the diagnosis of BCS to theday of OLT ranged from 1 month to 18 yr. Sixpatients were on chronic oral anticoagulation for3–156 months prior to OLT. Anticoagulation wasdiscontinued after 14 yr for patient no. 5 followingan episode of upper gastrointestinal bleeding at1 yr prior to OLT. Four other patients were not onoral anticoagulation prior to OLT because of acutepresentation of BCS within 4 weeks before OLT intwo patients and for unknown reasons in the othertwo patients.
All 11 patients had ascites requiring diuretictherapy at the time of OLT. Five patients had ahistory of hepatic encephalopathy treated withneomycin or lactulose or both. Pertinent laborat-ory data within 24 h prior to OLT were recorded.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics for the 11 patients in the present cohort who underwent liver transplantation
PatientGender(M/F)
Age(years)
Hematologicdiagnosis
Duration ofBCS diagnosisbefore OLT(months)
Anticoagulationbefore OLT(time before OLT)
Other treatments(time before OLT) HE
Bilirubin(mg/dL) INR
Creatinine(mg/dL)
1 F 27 PCV 24 Warfarin (15 months) SSPCS (26 months),hydroxyurea, phlebotomy
Yes 1.5 1.4 1.4
2 F 54 Protein Cdeficiency
48 Warfarin (39 months) TIPS (11 months) No 2.3 1.3 1.3
3 F 52 PCV 2 Warfarin (2 months) TIPS (9 d) No 15.9 1.9 0.64 F 56 PCV 1 Intraveneous heparin No 8.1 2.6 2.55 F 47 PCV 216 Warfarin for 14 yr
before stopped1 yr before OLT
Phlebotomy (7 yr) No 1.8 1.5 1.1
6 F 58 PCV 18 Warfarin(18 months)
Hydroxyurea (5 yr) No 7.0 3.6 1.5
7 M 29 MPDa 8 TIPS Yes 3.6 1.3 1.98 F 55 MPDa 1 Intraveneous
heparin (1 month)Peritoneovenous shunt Yes 1.7 1.1 3.9
9 M 62 Unknown 6 Failed TIPS attempt No 1.2 1.7 1.710 F 54 PCV 2 TIPS (2 months),
hydroxyurea (9 yr)Yes 4.9 1.5 0.9
11 F 50 Unknown 48 Warfarin (4 yr) Yes 1.2 1.2 0.8
BCS, Budd–Chiari syndrome; OLT, orthotopic liver transplantation; HE, hepatic encephalopathy; INR, international normalized ratio for prothrombin time; PCV, polycyt-hemia vera; SSPCS, side-to-side portal caval shunt; TIPS, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; MPD, myeloproliferative disorder.a The type of myeloproliferative disorder could not be further specified in two patients (patient nos 7 and 8).
Cruz et al.
502
The bilirubin level ranged from 1.5 to 8.1 mg/dLwith a median of 2.3 mg/dL. The serum creatinineranged from 0.9 to 2.5 mg/dL with a median of1.4 mg/dL. The last set of values for the interna-tional normalized ratio for prothrombin time(INR) before OLT was presented in Table 1.
Four patients underwent TIPS between 9 d and11 months prior to OLT. This procedure wascomplicated by severe intra-abdominal bleedingwith rapid deterioration of liver function in patientno. 3, resulting in OLT 9 d after the procedure.Patient no. 9 had attempted TIPS that failed fortechnical reasons. Patient no. 1 had a side-to-sideportocaval shunt performed at 26 months prior toOLT. Patient no. 8 had a peritoneovenous shuntplaced for control of ascites (Table 1).
Results
The outcome of the individual patient is summar-ized in Table 2. All 11 patients were started onintravenous heparin within the first 24 h afterOLT. The single patient with protein C deficiencywas not maintained on long-term anticoagulationas OLT would cure this disorder. The other eightpatients who survived the initial hospitalization forOLT were maintained on chronic warfarin
therapy. Six patients were also placed on hydroxy-urea and aspirin after OLT.
Patient and graft survival
The Kaplan–Meier survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 yrwere 81, 65 and 65%, respectively. The respectivegraft survival rates were identical to patient survi-val. The median follow-up was 4.7 yr amongsurvivors with a range of 0.3–11 yr. Nine of 11patients survived the initial hospitalization forOLT. The two early deaths were both because ofrecurrent BCS. The first patient (patient no. 3,Table 2) was found to have extensive thrombosisinvolving the hepatic veins, portal vein and IVC onDoppler ultrasound examination performed withinthe first 24 h after OLT. She experienced severegraft failure and died 2 d after OLT. Patient no. 4developed early recurrent BCS and underwent liverre-transplantation 4 d after primary OLT. Pathol-ogy of the first liver graft revealed extensive intra-hepatic thrombi consistent with rapid recurrence ofBCS. This patient developed multi-organ failureand died 16 d after the second OLT. At autopsy, alarge organizing thrombus was found in the IVC,associated with extensive central venous necrosis inthe liver. Patient no. 5 died at 27 months after OLT
Table 2. Summary of outcome after liver transplantation for the 11 patients in the present cohort
PatientThrombotic event(time after OLT)
Treatment forthrombotic eventin addition toanticoagulation
Bleeding event(time after OLT)
Treatment forbleeding event(time after OLT) Outcome
1 Splenic vein thrombosiswith gastric varicealbleeding at 7 and 9 d
Splenectomy at 11 d Splenic vein thrombosiswith gastric varicealbleeding at 7 and 9 d
Alive at 23 months
2 Intra-abdominalbleeding on day 3
Exploratorylaparotomy
Alive at 94 months
3 Recurrent BCS(within 1 d)
Died 3 d after OLTfrom graft failure
4 Recurrent BCS(within 2 d)
Re-OLT at 4 d after OLT Died 16 d afterre-OLT from multi-organ failure andrecurrent BCS of thesecond graft
5 Pulmonary embolism(intraoperative)
Intra-abdominal bleedingon day 6 from hepaticartery anastomosis
Exploratorylaparotomy
AML at 24 monthsDied at 27 months
6 Portal vein thrombosis(2 months)
Thrombolytic therapywith urokinase
Intra-abdominalbleeding on day 2
Exploratorylaparotomy
Alive at 3 months
7 Intra-abdominalbleeding on day 3
Exploratorylaparotomy
Alive at 9 months
8 Alive at 132 months9 Alive at 100 months
10 Alive at 100 months11 Recurrent BCS
(26 months)Placement of TIPS Alive at 29 months
OLT, orthotopic liver transplantation; BCS, Budd–Chiari syndrome; re-OLT, liver re-transplantation; TIPS, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.
Liver transplant for Budd–Chiari syndrome
503
following transformation of PCV to acute myelo-genous leukemia at 24 months after OLT.
Thrombotic complications
In addition to the two early deaths because ofrecurrent BCS, four other patients had thromboticevents following OLT (Table 2). Patient no. 1 wasfound to have splenic vein thrombosis presentingwith gastric variceal bleeding at 7 and 9 d respect-ively, after OLT, requiring splenectomy at 11 dafter OLT. Patient no. 5 experienced pulmonaryembolism intra-operatively but recovered withoutsequelae. Patient no. 6 developed portal veinthrombosis two months after OLT despite beingon oral anticoagulation with therapeutic INRlevels. This patient was given thrombolytic therapywith urokinase and was subsequently maintainedon low molecular weight heparin subcutaneously.Patient no. 11 developed recurrent BCS at26 months after OLT associated with sub-thera-peutic INR levels and non-compliance. Thispatient did well after a TIPS procedure.
Bleeding complications associated with anticoagulation
Not including patient no. 1 who had splenic veinthrombosis presenting with gastric variceal bleed-ing, four other patients had major intra-abdominalhemorrhage within the first 7 d after OLT requi-ring exploratory laparotomy for control of bleed-ing (Table 2). All patients had uneventful recoveryfrom these bleeding episodes and were subse-quently maintained on anticoagulation therapy.
Discussion
We presented our single-center experience withOLT for BCS in 11 patients and reviewed the datafrom eight series published since 1990 (14–21),which are summarized in Table 3. The 65%actuarial patient survival rates at 5 and 10 yr afterOLT in the present study were similar to thatreported in most other published series, althoughSrinivasan et. al. (20) reported an exceptional 5 yrsurvival rate of 95% (Table 3). For patients withBCS because of antithrombin III, protein S orprotein C deficiency, OLT also cures the inbornerror of metabolism and eliminates the associatedthrombogenic propensity. Other patients with BCSand MPD such as PCV continue to be at risk forthrombosis after OLT and require long-term anti-coagulation. The incidence of recurrent BCSfollowing OLT ranged from 0% to about 10% inthese studies (14–21). Including information fromisolated case reports (22, 23), recurrence of BCS
was diagnosed between 5 months and 7 yr afterOLT and was most often because of sub-therapeu-tic anticoagulation (14, 18, 21). Jamieson et al. (15)reported a patient who received no anticoagulationafter OLT and developed recurrent BCS at 28 dafter OLT. In addition to recurrent BCS, somepostoperative thrombotic events, including pul-monary embolism, portal vein thrombosis andhepatic artery thrombosis, have culminated indeath or graft loss (14, 15, 18–21) (Table 3). Earlyadministration of anticoagulation therapy toreduce the risk for thrombosis in these patientsneeds to be carefully balanced against bleedingcomplications associated with anticoagulationespecially in the early postoperative period. Melearet al. (21) reported a low incidence of thromboticevents with no major bleeding complications afterOLT for BCS using anti-platelet agents includinghydroxyurea and aspirin without warfarin in themajority of their patients with MPD.
Compared to prior studies, there are severalunusual aspects of our findings. First, early recur-rence of BCS within hours to days after OLTleading to rapid graft failure was observed in twopatients and confirmed by histopathology of theliver graft. One of the two patients died withoutre-OLT, whereas the other patient suffered fromrecurrent BCS again in the second liver graft anddied eventually of multi-organ failure. To ourknowledge, these are the first two reported casesthat clearly demonstrated rapid recurrence of BCSwithin days after OLT and led to rapid graft losseven when anticoagulation was initiated within24 h after OLT. Some investigators recommendedanticoagulation to be commenced within 6 h afterOLT (21), despite substantial bleeding risk duringthe early postoperative period. Second, the overallincidence of all types of thrombotic events in ourseries (55%) appears to be significantly higher thanother reports (Table 3), although the small samplesize may be a source of bias. We also observed ahigh incidence of serious postoperative bleedingrequiring surgical intervention. Only three of 11patients in our series were completely free ofhematologic complications after OLT. However,these complications were not the focus of some ofthe published series. Consequently, their trueincidence could have been underestimated in thesestudies.
One patient in our series died after transforma-tion from PCV to acute myelogenous leukemia at2 yr after OLT. This patient was diagnosed withPCV at 7 yr and BCS at 18 yr, prior to OLT.Srinivasan et al. (20) also described a patient withPCV who developed acute leukemia 8 yr afterOLT. It has been suggested that patients with PCV
Cruz et al.
504
Tab
le3.
Sum
mar
yof
clin
ical
dat
afr
omp
ublis
hed
serie
sof
liver
tran
spla
ntat
ion
for
Bud
d–C
hiar
isyn
dro
me
Aut
hor,
Yea
r(R
efer
ence
)N
umb
erof
pat
ient
s
Act
uaria
lpat
ient
surv
ival
(%)
Rec
urre
ntB
CS
,n
(%),
trea
tmen
tan
dou
tcom
eO
ther
thro
mb
otic
even
ts,
n(%
)B
leed
ing
even
ts,
n(%
)O
ther
even
ts1-
yr5-
yr10
-yr
Hal
ffet
al.
(14)
2369
45N
R2
(9)
–D
ied
at15
and
34m
onth
s,re
spec
tivel
y,w
ithou
tre
-OLT
3(1
3)–
PE
(Int
ra-o
per
ativ
ean
dd
ied
),H
AT
(5m
onth
s)an
dH
AT
(re-
OLT
at4
d)
NR
Jam
ieso
net
al.
(15)
2869
50N
R2
(7)
–D
ied
at28
d(r
ecei
ved
noan
ticoa
gul
atio
n)an
d11
yr
5(1
8)–
PV
Tin
four
(tw
od
ied
),H
AT
inon
e(d
ied
)
3(1
1)–
Die
dp
eri-
oper
ativ
ely
unre
late
dto
anti-
coag
ulat
ion
Lym
pho
ma
at5
yrin
one
pat
ient
Sha
ked
etal
.(1
6)14
8676
(3yr
)N
R0
(0)
NR
NR
Kno
opet
al.
(17)
888
NR
NR
1(1
3)–
Re-
OLT
at2
yr1
(13)
–H
AT
with
PV
T(r
e-O
LTat
1yr
)2
(25)
–P
osto
per
ativ
ein
tra-
abd
omin
alb
leed
and
GI
ble
edin
gR
ing
eet
al.
(18)
4369
6969
0(0
)6
(14)
–H
AT
intw
o(r
e-O
LTin
bot
h),
PV
Tin
thre
e(o
ned
ied
at19
d,
two
had
varic
eal
ble
edin
g),
cere
bra
lthr
omb
osis
inon
e(d
ied
at16
d)
Nin
ep
atie
nts
(21)
with
early
pos
top
erat
ive
ble
edin
g(d
etai
lsno
tp
rovi
ded
)
Hem
min
get
al.
(19)
782
67N
R0
(0)
1(1
4)–
HA
Tw
ithP
VT
at2
wee
ks(r
e-O
LT)
NR
Srin
iasa
net
al.
(20)
1995
9578
2(1
1)–
One
had
TIP
San
dsu
rgic
alsh
unt
(5m
onth
s),
one
had
re-O
LTat
7yr
2(1
1)–
HA
Tin
two,
bot
hha
dre
-OLT
7(3
7)–
Pos
top
erat
ive
intr
a-ab
dom
inal
ble
edin
gin
thre
e,G
Ib
leed
ing
inth
ree,
hem
orrh
agic
pan
crea
titis
inon
e
PC
Vto
AM
Lat
8yr
inon
ep
atie
nt
Mel
ear
etal
.(2
1)a
17N
RN
RN
R0
(0)
3(1
8)–
PV
Tin
two
(one
die
dat
124
mon
ths)
,th
rom
bos
isof
bra
chia
lar
tery
inon
ep
atie
nt
Non
e
Pre
sent
serie
s11
8165
653
(27)
–O
ned
ied
at2
d,
one
had
re-O
LTat
4d
and
die
d16
dla
ter,
one
had
TIP
Sat
2yr
3(2
7)–
PV
T(2
mon
ths
trea
ted
with
thro
mb
olys
is),
Sp
leni
cve
inth
rom
bos
is(t
reat
edw
ithsp
lene
ctom
y),
PE
(intr
a-op
erat
ive)
Six
even
tsin
five
pat
ient
s(4
5)–
Pos
top
erat
ive
intr
a-ab
dom
inal
ble
edin
gin
five,
GI
ble
edin
gin
one
(Tab
le2)
PC
Vto
AM
Lat
2yr
inon
ep
atie
nt
NR
,no
tre
por
ted
;re
-OLT
,liv
erre
-tra
nsp
lant
atio
n;P
E,
pul
mon
ary
emb
olis
m;
HA
T,he
pat
icar
tery
thro
mb
osis
;P
VT,
por
tal
vein
thro
mb
osis
;TI
PS
,tr
ansj
ugul
arin
trah
epat
icp
orto
syst
emic
shun
t;P
CV
,p
olyc
ythe
mia
vera
;A
ML,
acut
em
yelo
gen
eous
leuk
emia
;G
I,g
astr
oint
estin
al.
aTh
em
ajor
ityof
pat
ient
sin
this
stud
yre
ceiv
edan
tipla
tele
tag
ents
incl
udin
ghy
dro
xyur
eaan
das
piri
nw
ithou
tw
arfa
rinaf
ter
liver
tran
spla
ntat
ion.
Liver transplant for Budd–Chiari syndrome
505
have a near-normal life expectancy in the first 10 yrsince the initial diagnosis. However, the risk formyelofibrosis and acute leukemia increases there-after, estimated to be 10% at 15 yr and 25% at25 yr (3). Consequently, the duration of PCV maybe an important factor in considering OLT forthese patients (1–3).In conclusion, we observed a high incidence of
disease recurrence as well as other associatedhematologic complications in patients with BCSwho underwent OLT. Our series also included thefirst two cases of rapid recurrence of BCS leadingto graft failure within days after OLT, despiteanticoagulation initiated within 24 h after OLT.Correcting the thrombogenic propensity of theunderlying hematologic disorder remains the keyto the management of these patients, althoughanticoagulation carries a substantial bleeding riskin the early postoperative period.
Acknowledgements
The work was supported in part by a grant from theNational Institute of Health to the University of California,San Francisco Liver Center (P30DK26743).
References
1. Narayanan Menon KV, Shah V, Kamath PS. TheBudd–Chiari syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004: 350: 578.
2. Klein AS, Molmenti EP. Surgical treatment of Budd–Chiari syndrome. Liver Transpl 2003: 9: 891.
3. Ganguli SC, Ramzan NN, McKusick MA, Andrews
JC, Phyliky RL, Kamath PS. Budd–Chiari syndrome inpatients with hematologic disease: a therapeutic challenge.Hepatology 1998: 27: 1157.
4. DenningerMH, Chait Y, CasadeallN. Cause of portalor hepatic venous thrombosis in adults: the role of multipleconcurrent factors. Hepatology 2000: 31: 587.
5. Zeitoun G, Escolano S, Hadengue A et al. Outcome ofBudd–Chiari syndrome: a multivariate analysis of factorsrelated to survival including surgical portosystemicshunting. Hepatology 1999: 30: 84.
6. Min AD, Atillasoy EO, Schwartz ME, Thiim M,Miller CM, Bodenheimer HC Jr. Reassessing the role ofmedical therapy in the management of hepatic veinthrombosis. Liver Transpl Surg 1997: 3: 423.
7. Frank JW, Kamath PS, Stanson AM. Budd–Chiarisyndrome: early intervention with angioplasty andthrombolytic therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 1994: 69: 877.
8. Bibao JI, Pueyo JC, Longo JM. Interventional thera-peutic techniques in Budd–Chiari syndrome. CardiovascInterv Radiol 1997: 20: 112.
9. Orloff MJ, Daily PO, Orloff SL, Girard B, Orloff
MS. A 27-year experience with surgical treatment ofBudd–Chiari syndrome. Ann Surg 2000: 232: 340.
10. Ganger DR, Klapman JB, McDonald V. Transjugularintrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for Budd–Chiarisyndrome or portal vein thrombosis: review of indicationsand problems. Am J Gastroenterol 1999: 94: 603.
11. Perello A, Garcia-Pagan JC, Gilabert R et al. TIPS isa useful long-term derivative therapy for patients withBudd–Chiari syndrome uncontrolled by medical therapy.Hepatology 2002: 35: 132.
12. Roberts MS, Angus DC, Bryce CL, Valenta Z,Weissfeld L. Survival after liver transplantation in theUnited States: a disease-specific analysis of the UNOSdatabase. Liver Transpl 2004: 10: 886.
13. Adam R, McMaster P, O’Grady J et al. Evolution ofliver transplantation in Europe: report of the EuropeanLiver Transplant Registry. Liver Transpl 2003: 9: 1231.
14. Halff G, Todo S, Tzakis AG, Gordon RD, Starzl TE.Liver transplantation for the Budd–Chiari syndrome. AnnSurg 1990: 211: 43.
15. Jamieson NV, Williams R, Calne RY. Liver transplan-tation for Budd–Chiari syndrome. Ann Chir 1991: 45: 362.
16. Shaked A, Goldstein R, Klintmalm G, Drazan K,Husberg B, Busuttil RW. Portosystemic shunt versusorthotopic liver transplantation for the Budd–Chiarisyndrome. Surg Gynecol Obstetr 1992: 174: 453.
17. Knoop M, Lemmens H-P, Lengrehr J et al. Livertransplantation for Budd–Chiari syndrome. TransplantProc 1994: 26: 3577.
18. Ringe B, Lang H, Oldhafer KJ et al. Which is the bestsurgery for Budd–Chiari syndrome: venous decompressionor liver transplantation? A single-center experience with 50patients. Hepatology 1995: 21: 1337.
19. Hemming AW, Langer B, Greig P, Taylor BR, Adams
R, Heathcoate EJ. Treatment of Budd–Chiari syndromewith portosystemic shunt or liver transplantation. Am JSurg 1996: 171: 176.
20. Srinivasan P, Rela M, Prachalias A et al. Livertransplantation for Budd–Chiari syndrome. Transplanta-tion 2002: 73: 973.
21. Melear JM, Goldstein RM, Levy MF et al. Hemato-logic aspects of liver transplantation for Budd–Chiarisyndrome with special reference to myeloproliferatiedisorders. Transplantation 2002: 74: 1090.
22. Seltman HJ, Dekker A, Van Thiel DH, Boggs DR,Starzl TE. Budd–Chiari syndrome recurring in a trans-planted liver. Gastroenterology 1983: 84: 640.
23. Ruckert JC, Ruckert RI, Rudolf B, Muller JM.Recurrence of the Budd–Chiari syndrome after orthotopicliver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology 1999: 46:867.
Cruz et al.
506