high energy neutrinos and gamma-ray bursts
DESCRIPTION
High Energy Neutrinos and Gamma-Ray Bursts. Kohta Murase (YITP) S. Nagataki, K. Ioka, T. Nakamura K. Asano, S. Inoue, H. Takami K. Sato, F. Iocco, P.D. Serpico. taken from IceCube homepage. Neutrinos as a Probe of Cosmic-Ray Acceleration. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
High Energy Neutrinos High Energy Neutrinos andand
Gamma-Ray BurstsGamma-Ray BurstsKohta Murase (YITP)Kohta Murase (YITP)
S. Nagataki, K. Ioka, T. NakamuraK. Asano, S. Inoue, H. TakamiK. Sato, F. Iocco, P.D. Serpico
Neutrinos as a Probe of Cosmic-Ray AccelerationNeutrinos as a Probe of Cosmic-Ray Acceleration Astrophysical Accelerators (GRB, AGN, Cluster of Galaxies…) → cosmic-rays accelerated above TeV even up to ZeV
Neutrinos → good evidence of cosmic-ray acceleration
(Especially useful as a probe of ~100 PeV energy cosmic-rays)
pp/ pγ → π , K → ν , γ
pp/pγ reaction
GRB (talk by Prof. Meszaros)
Merits! - time and position coincidence
• Testing the shock model (baryonic or not?)
• Magnetic field/amount of baryons• The origin of observed UHECRs?
taken from IceCube homepage
km3 telescopes (IceCube/KM3Net)Various model predictions have become testable
Cosmic-rays → Deflection by magnetic fields (talk by Dr. Takami)Gamma-rays above TeV → Attenuation by CMB and CIB (talk by Dr. Asano)
Plan of TalkPlan of Talk
Model-Predictions for High-Energy Neutrinos from Astrophysical Sources
1. Neutrino Emission & Gamma-Ray Bursts
a. Pre-Swift Predictions (Prompt Emission)
b. Swift-Era Predictions (Flares and so on)
c. Neutrinos and Progenitors
2. Connection between Astrophysical Neutrino Sources and High-Energy Cosmic-Rays
マスタ サブタイトルの書式設定
4
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Afterglows Ep,max ~ ZeV
EeV ν, GeV-TeV γ
Prompt EmissionEp,max ~ EeV-ZeV
PeV ν, GeV-TeV γ
Below Photosphere
Ep,max ~ PeV-EeV
TeV-PeV ν, invisible γ
Meszaros (2001)
Flares/Early AfterglowsEp,max ~ EeV
PeV-EeV ν, GeV γ
•Treatment of pγreaction: Rectangular approx.→More sophistication• Inclusion of various cooling processes •Treatment of the GRB rate history: GRB rate models→e.g. Guetta et al. (04,07)
OutlineOutlinePrompt (Waxman & Bahcall 97), Afterglow (Waxman &
Bahcall 00/Dermer 02)•Assumption that observed UHECRs come from GRBs (in original works)•Prediction of neutrinos associated with prompt and afterglow emission
KM & Nagataki, PRD, 73, 063002 (2006)
+Motivated by the recent Swift’s discoveries,
we have predicted new possibilities of neutrinos and cosmic rays.KM & Nagataki, PRL, 97, 051101 (2006) KM, Ioka, Nagataki, & Nakamura, ApJL, 651, L5 (2006)
Δ-resonance
KM, PRD, 76, 123001 (2007)
(And many studies, e.g., Halzen & Hooper 99, Guetta et al. 04, Asano 05)
Prompt Emission from Classical (High-Luminosity) GRBs
Internal Shock ModelPeV ν, GeV-TeV γ
(Waxman & Bahcall 97)
Meszaros (2001)
AfterglowsExternal Shock Model
EeV ν, GeV-TeV γ (Waxman & Bahcall 00)
(Dermer 02)
Prompt Neutrino EmissionPrompt Neutrino Emission
r~1013-1015cm
•Inner range (~1013 cm)neutrino efficient, UHECRs impossible•Middle range (~1014 cm)neutrino efficient, UHE proton possible•Outer range (~1015 cm)neutrino inefficient, UHE nuclei survive
large uncertainties...
Γ=300, Uγ=UB
EGRB,γ=1053 ergs (A&B)
A: muon events ~ 0.1B: muon events ~ 0.01
C: muon events ~ 1(C is a very extreme
case)
Only nearby/energetic bursts can be promising
(r-determination ← GLAST (e.g., KM & Ioka 08))
A r~1013.5 cm
B r~1014.5 cm
z=1
The Cumulative BackgroundThe Cumulative Background
• ~10 events/yr by IceCube ( fiducial baryon load)• Our models are tested by AMANDA/IceCube group. The optimistic model is being constrained (Achterberg et al. 08)
fiducial baryon loadingEHECR ~ EGRB,γ
higher baryon loadingEHECR ~ 5 EGRB,γ
The key parameter – baryon loading ΕHECR ≡ε2 N(ε)
Set A - r~1013-1014.5cm
Set B - r~1014-1015.5cm
Γ=102.5, Uγ=UB
KM & Nagataki, PRD, 73, 063002 (2006)
Current AMANDA limit
Towards testing the GRB-UHECR hypothesis through νs
Early AfterglowsEeV ν, GeV-TeV γ
(Dermer 07)(KM 07)
Prompt Emissionfrom Low-Luminosity GRBs
PeV ν, GeV-TeV γ(KM et al. 06)
(Gupta & Zhang 06)
Meszaros (2001)
FlaresPeV-EeV ν, GeV γ(KM &Nagataki 06)
Novel Results of Swift (XRF060218)Novel Results of Swift (XRF060218)
1. Low-luminosity (LL) GRBs?• e.g., GRB060218 (XRF060218) ・ The 2nd nearby event (~140Mpc) ・ Associated with a SN Ic ・ Thermal component (shock breakout?) ・ Much dimmer than usual GRBs (ELL,γ ~ 1050 ergs ~ 0.001 EGRB,γ)・ LL GRBs (e.g., XRF060218, GRB980425) → more frequent than HL GRBs (Local Rate ~ 102-3 Gpc-1 yr-3 ) (Soderberg et al. 06, Liang et al. 07
Guetta et al. 07 etc…)
Liang et al. (07)
dark brightR
ate
Luminosity
Neutrinos from LL GRBsNeutrinos from LL GRBsEx.) XRF060218-like burst•Prompt nonthrmal emission Epk ~ 5 keV
↑Internal shock model (e.g., Toma, Ioka, Sakamoto, & Nakamura 07)
•Prolonged thermal emission kT ~ 0.15 keV
KM, Ioka, Nagataki, & Nakamura, ApJL, 651, L5 (2006)
r/Γ2=fixed
D=10Mpc
Muon events ~ 1 event
Muon events ~ 0.1 event
See also Gupta & Zhang 07For early afterglowssee Yu, Dai, & Zheng (08)
Novel Results of Swift (Flares)Novel Results of Swift (Flares)
2. Flares in the early afterglow phase• Energetic (Eflare,γ ~ 0.1 EGRB,γ (Falcone et al. 07)) (Eflare,γ ~ EGRB,γ for some flares such as GRB050502b)•δt >~ 102-3 s, δt/T < 1 → internal dissipation models (e.g. late internal shock model)• Flaring in the (far-UV)/x-ray range (Epeak ~ (0.1-1) keV)• (Maybe) relatively lower Lorentz factors (Γ ~ a few×10)• Flares are common (at least 1/3 ~ 1/2 of LGRBs) (even for SGRBs)
Baryonic (possibly dirty fireball?) vs non-baryonic?↑neutrinos!
Flares
Burrows et al. (07)
EnergeticsEnergetics
Neutrino Energy Flux∝ Photopion (p→π)Production Efficiency
NonthermalBaryon Energy×Rat
e×
HL GRB(Waxman & Bahcall
97)
Flare(Murase & Nagataki
06)
LL GRB(Murase et al. 06)
(Gupta & Zhang 07)
Isotropic energy 1 ~0.01-0.1 0.001
Pion Production
Efficiency
1 10 1
Apparent Rate 1 1 ~100-1000 The contribution to
neutrino background1 ~0.1-1 ~0.1-1
↓Normalizing all the typical values for HL GRBs to 1
Hence, we can expect flares and LL GRBs are important!
Neutrino Predictions in the Swift EraNeutrino Predictions in the Swift Era
Possible dominant contribution in the very high energy region
KM & Nagataki, PRL, 97, 051101 (2006)
KM, Ioka, Nagataki, & Nakamura, ApJL, 651, L5 (2006)
Approaches to GRBs through high-energy neutrinos Flares→information on flare models (baryonic or nonbaryonic etc.)LL GRBs→νs as an indicator of far SNe associated with LL GRBs
ν flashes → Coincidence with flares/early AGs, a few events/yrνs from LL GRBs → little coincidence with bursts, a few events/yr
Flares (Eflare,γ = 0.1 EGRB,γ ) LL GRBs
(ELL,γ ~ 0.001 EGRB,γ )
HL GRBs
See also, Gupta & Zhang 07
Notes on Early Afterglow EmissionNotes on Early Afterglow Emissionshallow decay
・ Forward Shock Model (energy injection etc.)・ Reverse Shock Model (Genet et al. 07, Beloborodov 07)
・ Late Prompt Emission Model (Ghisellini et al. 07)
Typically Eshallow,γ ~ 0.1 EGRB,γ (Liang et al. 07)• RS-FS model: ν-detection by IceCube would be difficult…• Late prompt emission model: ν-detection may be possible.
t
Its origin is still controversial...
Prompt
KM, PRD, 76, 123001 (2007)
high baryon loadingEHECR ~ EGRB,γ
fiducial baryon loadingEHECR ~ Eshallow,γ
~ 0.1 EGRB,γ
steep decay
(For forward shock νs,see Dermer 02, 07)
Below Photosphere
TeV ν
(Meszaros & Waxman 01)
(Schneider et al. 02)
( Razzaque, Meszaros, & Waxman 03)
Meszaros (2001)
Below/Around PhotosphereBelow/Around Photosphere
pp reaction → based onGeant4 & SYBILL codes
Below/around the photosphere (even inside the star)Cosmic-ray acceleration could be still expected
(e.g., Meszaros & Waxman 01, Razzaque et al. 03)
(pp optical depth) ~ np σpp(r/Γ) >~ 0.1 → pp reaction important
r=1012.5 cmΓ=100, UB=0.1Uγ
strong meson/muon cooling ↓
kaon-contribution is important (Ando & Beacom 05) (Asano & Nagataki 06)
Neutrinos and ProgenitorNeutrinos and Progenitor
Fig. from Razzaque, Meszaros, & Waxman
Fabio, KM et al., ApJ (08)
termination shockTermination shock → shock dissipation→ thermalization ~keV→ providing target photons (Meszaros & Waxman 01)
(pp neutrinos are not shown→)
Schneider et al. (POPIII)
Precursor = successful GRBs (GRB rate)
Choked = failed GRBs (SN Ibc rate)
マスタ サブタイトルの書式設定
20
Connection betweenAstrophysical Neutrino
Sources and High-Energy Cosmic-Rays
GRB-UHECR HypothesisGRB-UHECR Hypothesis
3153
UHECRGpcyrergs~ 10E
-- ergs10E53~
Possible but requiring high baryon loading…(Lower local rate leads to higher baryon load…)
The original argument (Waxman 95, Vietri 95)
Gpcyr1 31GRB
--~
← UHECR-normalization (except for Flares)
Comparable
HL Prompt ~ 30 events/yrLL Prompt ~ 10 events/yr AG (ISM) ~ 0.1 events/yr AG (WIND) ~ 1 event/yrFlare ~ 2 events/yr (not UHECR source)
KM, PRD, 76, 123001 (07)
Notes: HL/LL GRBs and UHECRsNotes: HL/LL GRBs and UHECRs
UHECR production is possible in low-luminosity GRBs
KM, Ioka, Nagataki, & Nakamura, submitted (2008)
The source number density ← PAO, TA Burst Models → Sensitive to effective EGMF strength
(structured + intergalactic)Necessity of future observations and theoretical studies
(see talk by Dr. Takami)
Notes: Heavy Nuclei?Notes: Heavy Nuclei?Wang, Razzaque, & Meszaros (2008)
KM, Ioka, Nagataki, & Nakamura, submitted (2008)
Γ=102.5
Γ=1000
Recent PAO results → (tentative) existence of heavier nuclei (Unger et al. 07) UHE nuclei production in GRBs (IS, RS, and FS models) and hypernovae → Possible at enough large radii r
Survival of UHE heavy nuclei→ neutrino “dark” → TeV gamma-ray “bright” <escape of TeV gamma-rays> + secondary delayed emission
(Totani 98, Asano & Inoue 07)
(KM, Asano, & Nagataki, ApJ (07), Takahashi, KM, et al., in prep. (08))
(talk by Dr. Asano)
Neutrinos from AGNNeutrinos from AGNThe most frequently discussed UHECR candidates
(talk by Prof. Blandford, Dr. Inoue)
Many theoretical papers on neutrinos(Szabo & Protheroe, Stecker et al., Rachen & Biermann, Muniz & Meszaros, Mannheim, Atoyan & Dermer…)
Ex.) Giant AGN Flare model (Farrar & Gruzinov 08)
r=1017.5 cmΓ=10
Muon event rate ~(0.1-1) events/yr
Neutrinos from Clusters of GalaxiesNeutrinos from Clusters of Galaxies
146
acsergs~ 10L -3145
HECRGpcyrergs~ 10E
--
1.0~acc
KM, Inoue & Nagataki, to be submitted (08)KM, Inoue, & Nagataki, in prep. (08)
CGs ⇔ The origin of second knee cosmic-rays??CGs ⇔ The origin of second knee cosmic-rays??
Shock radius ~ virial radius→ Muon events ~ a few events/yr
Cluster shocks (e.g., accretion shocks) → Emax ~ Z 1019 eV may be possible
Diffusion from Central AGN Model (Berezinsky et al., Colafrancesco & Blasi)
(See talk by Dr. Inoue)
36
CGMpc~ 10n -
required Broken PL
Broken PL spectrum→ (0.1-1)% of EGRET limit
SN shock+ CG shock
GZK NeutrinosGZK Neutrinos
•Ankle model vs dip model → dip model leads to 10 PeV bump•Strong evolution model → detection in the near future (Yukusel & Kistler 07)
PAO limit
Takami, KM, Nagataki, Sato (08)
Auger 07 limit
Emax=1022eV
CMB+CIB(Best-fit model of Kneiske et al. 04)
High-Energy Neutrinos and GRBs: SummaryHigh-Energy Neutrinos and GRBs: Summary• We have performed more sophisticated calculations on
neutrino spectra under the internal/external model. → Our results have been tested by AMANDA/IceCube.Our results have been tested by AMANDA/IceCube.• We have predicted new possibilities of neutrino emission
from GRBs, motivated by Swift observations. 1. Neutrinos from flares and early afterglowsNeutrinos from flares and early afterglows 2. Neutrino bursts from low luminosity (LL) GRBsNeutrino bursts from low luminosity (LL) GRBs• We can also expect other neutrino signals (CG, AGN etc).We can also expect other neutrino signals (CG, AGN etc).
• Neutrinos (and gamma-rays) are useful as a probe of cosmic-ray acceleration in astrophysical sources.
• If detected, we can obtain the important clues to models of the source and cosmic-ray acceleration.
• The connection between GRBs and UHECRs? • High energy neutrino astronomy will come soon!